ARB

The Arbitrum Foundation has made a couple of new governance proposals following the fracas that occurred over its first attempt.

The Arbitrum Foundation has released a raft of new improvement proposals following the fracas that ensued after its first failed attempt at governance.

On April 5, Ethereum layer-2 solutions provider Arbitrum posted new Arbitrum Improvement Proposals (AIPs) for the governance of the network.

The new proposals include AIP-1.1, which covers a smart contract lockup schedule, spending, budget and transparency. The other, AIP-1.2, tackles amendments to current founding documents and lowers the proposal threshold from 5 million Arbitrum (ARB) tokens to 1 million ARB “to make governance more accessible.”

In an April 5 tweet, it confirmed the Arbitrum DAO came to a consensus against its first proposal, AIP-1.

1/10 With the ArbitrumDAO reaching consensus against AIP-1, it's now time to incorporate community feedback, and move forward with new AIPs and documentation that address key areas of concern.

Details below

— Arbitrum (,) (@arbitrum) April 5, 2023

On April 2, the Arbitrum Foundation stated AIP-1 “likely will not pass” due to community backlash. Tokenholders objected to the proposal, arguing that it encompassed too many topics, and decried granting around $1 billion worth of ARB tokens to the foundation.

The foundation then backtracked, stating in an April 5 tweet that it would not take control of the tokens:

“The Foundation will not move any of the remaining 700M tokens in the Administrative Budget Wallet until an acceptable budget and smart contract lockup schedule have been approved by the DAO.”

The foundation also issued a transparency report that “describes actions taken to get the DAO up and running.”

“We have heard the feedback,” it stated, before adding that it has “worked diligently to address it and make sure the Foundation can represent, and serve the DAO’s best interests with their support.”

The two new AIPs were posted on the Arbitrum community forum and will be available for feedback for at least 72 hours before a planned week-long snapshot vote.

Related: Arbitrum to break up governance votes after community backlash

ARB prices have dropped 4% over the past 24 hours, falling to $1.22. The layer-2 token was dumped heavily following its airdrop on March 23 and is down 86% from its peak price of over $8.50 on that day.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

The Arbitrum Foundation has backtracked on a controversial proposal and ratification vote that gave it control of a huge chunk of tokens.

Ethereum layer 2 solutions provider Arbitrum has backtracked on its governance voting system following community backlash from token holders.

On April 2, the Arbitrum Foundation tweeted that its first governance proposal, AIP-1, “likely will not pass” and added its “committed to addressing the feedback received from the community.”

The move will break up the debatable governance package into smaller segments. The team noted:

“AIP-1 is too large and covers too many topics. We will follow the DAO’s advice and split the AIP into parts. This will allow the community to discuss and vote on the different subsections.”

The U-turn follows a weekend of community backlash over the foundation’s “ratification” vote for decisions it had already undertaken. The proposal would have given the foundation, a centralized company, control over 750 million Arbitrum (ARB) tokens worth around $1 billion.

Critics, such as decentralized finance and decentralization advocate Chris Blec, argued the proposal was “decentralization theatre.”

I just want to clarify:

There is NOTHING decentralized about Arbitrum or Optimism.

Just because you can use a network without permission doesn’t mean it’s decentralized.

Both can halt the chain, modify any code, censor any transaction, freeze any wallet, or steal from the DAO.

— Chris Blec (@ChrisBlec) April 2, 2023

The foundation stated that the 750 million tokens received would be voted on in its own AIP. “We’re working on options to add more accountability,” it stated, adding, “for example, a vesting period of 4 years. Furthermore, tokens held by the Foundation cannot be used to vote.”

There will also be a budgeting proposal, in which the foundation will propose transparency reports “to make the community aware of how the funds are spent over time.”

The Special Grants program is vague and lacks DAO involvement, the foundation stated. It will be renamed “Ecosystem Development Fund” with context provided on how the funds will be used to benefit the Arbitrum cosystem.

Related: Arbitrum’s first governance proposal sparks controversy with $1B at stake

The new Arbitrum Improvement Proposals will be issued “early this week,” the foundation concluded.

ARB token prices took a massive hit over the weekend, slumping 18% from an April 1 high of $1.40 to a low of $1.15 in the April 3 morning Asian trading session, according to CoinGecko.

ARB has seen an 86% price decline since its airdrop on March 23.

Hodler’s Digest: FTX EU opens withdrawal, Elon Musk calls for AI halt, and Binance news