1. Home
  2. Bittrex

Bittrex

Crypto Exchange Bittrex Global Announces Plans To Cease Operations and Wind Down Trading

Crypto Exchange Bittrex Global Announces Plans To Cease Operations and Wind Down Trading

Embattled crypto exchange Bittrex Global has decided to wind down operations after its US-based arm filed for bankruptcy amid a slew of regulatory challenges earlier this year. The foreign exchange will disable all trading activity on December 4th. No concrete withdrawal deadline has been established, but Bittrex Global recommends customers pull out their assets as […]

The post Crypto Exchange Bittrex Global Announces Plans To Cease Operations and Wind Down Trading appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Bittrex Global announces all trading will be disabled as it winds down operations

The announcement came roughly nine months after U.S.-based crypto exchange Bittrex said it would shutter operations in response to the country’s regulatory environment.

Liechtenstein-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex Global has announced it plans to wind down operations starting with the suspension of trading activity on Dec. 4.

In a Nov. 20 update published to its website, Bittrex Global said all users with U.S. dollar holdings needed to convert their funds to Euros or cryptocurrency before Dec. 4 or risk being unable to withdraw the assets. On Dec. 4, the platform will suspend trading activities and only allow certain withdrawals.

“This decision was not made lightly, and we understand the inconvenience it may have on our valued customers,” said Bittrex Global.

The platform added:

“Do not make any deposits to our platform. We cannot guarantee that they will be received safely. If you do send a deposit, your funds may be permanently lost as a result of the attempted transfer.”

The announcement came roughly nine months after its U.S.-based arm, Bittrex, said it planned to wind down operations in the country starting on April 30 “due to continued regulatory uncertainty.” In April, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Bittrex for operating as an unregistered exchange, broker and clearing agency.

Related: On the shutdown of Bittrex in the US and SEC actions — Bittrex Global CEO at Consensus 2023

Bittrex filed for Chapter 11 protection in U.S. bankruptcy court in May and settled its case with the SEC for $24 million in penalties and interest in August. The platform reopened withdrawals for users following approval in Delaware bankruptcy court.

The SEC also charged Bittrex Global in April “in connection with its operation of a single shared order book along with Bittrex.” It’s unclear whether the regulator’s actions contributed to the crypto exchange, headquartered in Liechtenstein, announcing the winding down of operations. 

Magazine: US enforcement agencies are turning up the heat on crypto-related crime

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

SEC announces $24M settlement for case against Bittrex and its former CEO

The U.S. regulator filed a complaint in April claiming Bittrex and William Shihara operated an unregistered exchange, also separately charging Bittrex Global.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced an agreement with crypto trading platform Bittrex and co-founder and former CEO William Shihara for operating an unregistered exchange.

In an Aug. 10 notice, the SEC said Bittrex and Bittrex Global agreed to pay $14.4 million in disgorgement, $4 million in prejudgment interest, and $5.6 million in civil penalties to settle the legal dispute with the federal regulator. The agreement is still subject to court approval.

“For years, Bittrex worked with token issuers to 'scrub' their online statements of any indicia that they were investment contracts — all in an effort to evade the federal securities laws,” said SEC enforcement director Gurbir Grewal. “Today’s settlement makes clear that you cannot escape liability by simply changing labels or altering descriptions because what matters is the economic realities of those offerings.”

In a statement provided to Cointelegraph, Shihara called the settlement a “good outcome”, adding the United States needed to “[strike] a balance between fostering innovation, encouraging entrepreneurs and the need to protect consumers”. Shihara was the CEO of Bittrex from its founding in 2014 to his departure in 2019.

The SEC’s complaint filed in April claimed Bittrex and Shihara operated an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency. The financial regulator also filed a separate enforcement action against Bittrex Global for “its operation of a single shared order book along with Bittrex”.

Related: SEC is ‘wrongfully attempting’ to police crypto markets — Paradigm counsel

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network took enforcement actions against Bittrex in October 2022, resulting in the firm agreeing to a $29-million settlement. The exchange announced in March it was planning to shut down operations in the United States in April — claiming the move was due to the country’s regulatory environment — and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May.

As of Aug. 10, the SEC has legal cases pending against crypto firms including Binance, Coinbase, Ripple Labs and Terraform Labs. Many U.S. lawmakers and industry leaders have criticized the agency for taking a “regulation by enforcement” approach to crypto.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Will CBDCs Replace Crypto? Bittrex CEO Says Government Agenda a Solution in Search of a Problem

Will CBDCs Replace Crypto? Bittrex CEO Says Government Agenda a Solution in Search of a Problem

Bittrex Global CEO Oliver Finch has some doubts regarding the legitimacy of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Finch says in a new Kitco News interview that CBDCs are a “solution in search of a problem.” According to the Bittrex Global CEO, the centralized nature of CBDCs makes them inherently different from Bitcoin (BTC) and other […]

The post Will CBDCs Replace Crypto? Bittrex CEO Says Government Agenda a Solution in Search of a Problem appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

SEC is ‘wrongfully attempting’ to police crypto markets: Paradigm counsel

Rodrigo Seira has blasted the SEC for overstepping its jurisdiction in its case against crypto exchange Bittrex.

Crypto investment firm Paradigm’s Special Counsel Rodrigo Seira has become the latest to slam the United States securities regulator, this time for “wrongfully” pursuing crypto exchange Bittrex in an attempt to police secondary crypto markets.

In a July 11 Twitter thread, Seira added his thoughts after an amicus brief filing from Paradigm, arguing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's case against U.S.-based crypto exchange Bittrex should be “dismissed” as it relies upon an unreasonable use of the Howey test to make its claims.

On July 7, Paradigm filed an amicus brief, which claimed the financial regulator overstepped its jurisdiction.

In his thread, Seira also pointed out that SEC chair Gary Gensler had previously admitted that crypto exchanges did not have an adequate regulatory framework, making it clear in his view that the regulator lacks sufficient authority to regulate these secondary markets.

Seira made similar arguments in a July 7 blog post, noting the SEC lacks authority because crypto-assets do not involve “investment contracts.” As a result, crypto-assets do not fall under the agency’s remit.

“Until the SEC engages in the rulemaking Coinbase has requested, the digital-assets industry is stuck in limbo, simultaneously told to ‘come in and register’ yet having no effective means of doing so.”

Related: Bittrex challenges SEC’s authority in crypto lawsuit, seeks dismissal

The SEC first filed a complaint against Bittrex on April 17. Nearly two weeks later on April 30, the exchange surrendered its Florida money transmitter license before eventually filing for bankruptcy on May 8.

This also marks the second time that Paradigm has offered its support to a crypto organization facing legal action from the SEC.

On May 11, Paradigm petitioned to file an amicus brief in support of Coinbase which claimed that the SEC had failed to provide clear rules or guidance for digital asset firms in the U.S.

Opinion: GOP crypto maxis almost as bad as Dems’ ‘anti-crypto army’

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Bittrex may still face enforcement action in Florida amid bankruptcy

A filing in bankruptcy court from Florida's Office of Financial Regulation suggested the regulator still had the “administrative discretion” to charge Bittrex.

The Florida Office of Financial Regulation is considering action against United States-based cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May.

In a July 5 filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) assistant general counsel Brandon Greenberg said the state regulator had been given information on Bittrex’s alleged failure to comply with Florida law. According to Greenberg, the OFR still had the “administrative discretion” to charge or not charge Bittrex.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Bittrex on April 17, the exchange surrendered its Florida money transmitter license on April 30, and Bittrex filed for bankruptcy on May 8. At the time, the OFR said Bittrex surrendering its license “would not affect our prosecution of the Complaint”, which included allegations that the firm had failed to segregate customer assets with its operating capital, failed to maintain a surety bond, and another complaint which was redacted from the court filing.

Related: Bittrex challenges SEC’s authority in crypto lawsuit, seeks dismissal

The SEC enforcement action, bankruptcy case, and potential lawsuit in Florida came following Bittrex announcing it would wind down operations in the U.S. by April, citing "continued regulatory uncertainty" in the country. The exchange announced on June 15 that certain users could access their accounts and withdraw funds until Aug. 31.

Though the SEC filed separate charges against Bittrex Global in April, the global exchange has largely been unaffected by the regulatory and financial troubles the U.S. exchange faces. The global firm is regulated in Liechtenstein and Bermuda.

Magazine: US enforcement agencies are turning up the heat on crypto-related crime

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Mark Cuban, John Reed Stark clash over the cause of FTX’s collapse

Mark Cuban thinks the SEC could have saved U.S. customers from FTX had it adopted Japan’s approach to crypto regulation, but John Reed Stark disagrees.

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban has again locked horns with former securities chief John Reed Stark, this time over who was ultimately to blame for FTX’s collapse and the impact on creditors.

During a heated back-and-forth exchange, Cuban argued had the United States Securities and Exchange Commission set “clear regulations,” no one would have lost money from its collapse.

Stark earlier suggested cryptocurrency and stablecoins — including central bank digital currencies — solve no problems and that the crypto industry operates without regulatory oversight, consumer protections and audits, among other things.

Cuban argued that Japanese regulators — an increasingly Web3 friendly jurisdiction — are an example of a regulator that has done it right.

“When FTX crashed, NO ONE IN FTX JAPAN LOST MONEY,” he said.

Stark — a cryptocurrency skeptic — shot back, saying it “seems a bit of a stretch”  to blame the SEC for the collapses of FTX, BlockFi, Celsius, Terra and Voyager, or what he called “dumpster fires.”

While Stark conceded that the SEC isn’t always right, he claimed the regulator saved investors “millions, perhaps even billions” in crypto losses.

The ex-SEC official claimed while the cryptocurrency industry seeks regulatory clarity, whenever rules are promulgated or proposed, “the crypto industry cries foul” and often responds by filing a “flashy legal challenge to its enactment.”

Cuban hit back, explaining the “best way” to prevent cryptocurrency fraud is to implement “brightline investor protection regulations.” He added:

“Anyone who doesn't register is de-facto in violation, can't operate and will be shut down. That's how you protect crypto investors.”

Stark, however, claims that the SEC only charged the likes of Binance, Coinbase, Beaxy and Bittrex months after the regulator made it clear that those firms were not in compliance.

Related: Lawmakers are wrong to target Gary Gensler

“[These firms] opted to ignore the SEC — and reap profits for as long as possible without registering,” Stark added.

It is the second time in three weeks that the pair have clashed over how cryptocurrency should be regulated.

On June 11, Cuban called out the SEC for purportedly failing to provide cryptocurrency firms with a clear registration process.

He claimed it’s “near impossible to know” what constitutes security because the SEC’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” document fails to explain how cryptocurrency firms can come into compliance.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Bittrex challenges SEC’s authority in crypto lawsuit, seeks dismissal

Bittrex has adopted a similar approach to Coinbase, aligning its arguments closely with those made by the larger cryptocurrency exchange.

Bittrex, a cryptocurrency exchange, has made a notable move in its legal dispute with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by submitting a motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed against it.

In its recent court filing, Bittrex argues that the SEC does not possess the necessary authority to regulate cryptocurrencies as securities unless explicitly granted by Congress. This assertion challenges the SEC's interpretation of existing securities regulations and seeks to establish a more defined regulatory framework that accommodates the distinct characteristics of digital assets.

In its motion to dismiss, Bittrex has adopted a similar approach to Coinbase, aligning its arguments closely with those made by the larger cryptocurrency exchange. This alignment indicates a strategic move by Bittrex to capitalize on the robust legal framework established by Coinbase and construct a unified defense against the SEC's lawsuit.

Screenshot image of Bittrex motion to dismiss. Source: Court Listener

Like Coinbase, Bittrex's legal team identifies what they perceive as shortcomings in the SEC's allegations regarding the trading of investment contracts. While both defendants acknowledge that the initial sale of certain crypto assets could be classified as securities contracts, they contend that the same classification does not extend to assets traded on secondary markets.

As a result, they argue that once an asset is launched and actively traded on secondary markets, it should no longer be considered a security, but rather categorized as a commodity or another class of digital asset.

Moreover, Bittrex contends that the SEC did not adequately communicate that its actions were prohibited, emphasizing a defense strategy commonly employed by crypto defendants who challenge the SEC's allegations.

Related: Bittrex withdrawals set to resume after bankruptcy court gives green light

The SEC filed allegations against Bittrex and its co-founder, William Shihara, in April, for running an unregistered national securities exchange. As per the complaint, Bittrex enabled the trading of digital assets that met the securities criteria outlined in U.S. federal securities laws, without obtaining SEC registration as an exchange.

Additionally, Bittrex Global GmbH, the foreign affiliate of Bittrex, faced charges from the SEC for not registering as a national securities exchange. 

Magazine: SEC hates Metaverse,

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

Bittrex withdrawals set to resume after bankruptcy court gives green light

The court left the issue of the subordinacy of government claims open; Bittrex received multimillion-dollar credits from FinCEN and OFAC.

Cryptocurrency trading platform Bittrex is expected to resume customer withdrawals on June 15 following an order from a judge in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The decision does not settle the question of the subordination of U.S. government claims, which had led to objections against its plan.

“Objections (if any) to the Motion having been withdrawn, resolved or overruled on the merits,” Judge Brendan Shannon’s June 13 order read. It went on to stipulate that nothing in the motion or the order constituted a finding on whether crypto assets or transactions with them are securities.

The order also specified that it does not determine the priority of creditors or prohibit the United States from clawing back assets from customers if it is not paid in full. Bittrex’s largest creditor is the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), to which it owes $24 million.

Bittrex general counsel David Maria told Cointelegraph:

“We are happy that the court will allow us to let customers access their accounts and withdraw any remaining assets, and we hope that our customers will take advantage of this opportunity. Our goal has always been to make all of our customers whole during this process.”

Maria said the platform is expected to be fully operational for withdrawals by 3:00 pm ET (7:00 UTC) on June 15.

Related: On the shutdown of Bittrex in the US and SEC actions — Bittrex Global CEO at Consensus 2023

Seattle-based Bittrex declared its intention to wind down U.S. operations by the end of April. It declared bankruptcy in May after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the exchange for unregistered securities transactions.

All of that came after OFAC and the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) assessed penalties of $24 million and $29 million, respectively, for violating sanctions imposed on Crimea, Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria. The exchange received credit worth $5 million from FinCEN and $24 million from OFAC at that time.

The U.S. Justice Department had opposed a Bittrex plan to reimburse customers, subordinating government claims.

Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours

US DOJ opposes bankrupt Bittrex’s plan to repay customers ahead of credited fines

Bittrex owes $29 million on penalties for sanctions violations and may still face penalties in a case brought by the SEC.

The United States Justice Department (DOJ) has filed an objection to a motion by bankrupt cryptocurrency trading platform Bittrex to allow customers to withdraw their crypto and fiat. The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) is Bittrex’s biggest creditor, but its claim would be subordinated under the Bittrex proposal.

Bittrex was charged in October by both OFAC and the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) with sanctions violations for allowing individuals based in Crimea, Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria to carry put transactions from 2014 to 2017. The agencies assessed penalties of $24 million and $29 million, respectively.

A Bittrex spokesperson told Cointelegraph at the time that the exchange was “pleased” to resolve the charges. It agreed to pay the $24 million of its penalty to FinCEN, receiving $5 million credit from FinCEN, while OFAC credited Bittrex $24 million, which remains Bittrex’s largest debt.

Related: On the shutdown of Bittrex in the US and SEC actions — Bittrex Global CEO at Consensus 2023

The crypto platform’s problems did not stop there. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Bittrex for unregistered securities operations in April, and that action could also result in monetary penalties. In May, Bittrex declared bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Within days of its bankruptcy filing, Bittrex proposed a plan to make customers whole.

The DOJ argued in its June 7 filing that the Bittrex proposal improperly applies the standard that would allow it to pay some creditors ahead of others. The filing stated:

“Fairness and equity demand that if the OFAC and FinCEN Debts cannot be paid in full by confirmation, the United States should have a chance to prove that the cryptocurrency assets belong to the Debtors and can be clawed back from the customers.”

The DOJ also objected that the Bittrex motion is premature, as the Bittrex bankruptcy has yet to be confirmed by the court. The bankruptcy hearing will be held on June 14.

Magazine: Rogue states dodge economic sanctions, but is crypto in the wrong?

Meme coin pre-sale raises over $40 million on Solana in less than 24 hours