1. Home
  2. ICO

ICO

The next ICO boom is coming — and it will be better than 2018

Thanks to the ICO busts of 2018 and the SEC's newfound attention for a raft of altcoins, scrutiny of new projects has become much higher than in the past.

The ICO boom of 2018 was an absolute disaster. It was a Wild West that saw venture capital (VC) funds throwing money at the wall to see what stuck with little regard for due diligence. More than $7 billion was funneled into ICOs in 2018, often based on little more than a drunken conversation at a cryptocurrency party. But the stories that stick are the monumental disasters that have made ICOs synonymous with fraud.

Perhaps the most prominent of these was the Bitconnect Ponzi scheme. After promising sky-high returns and seeing the value of its token (BCC) rocket to $400, it soon left investors nursing losses of some $2.4 billion. So it's understandable that as a new bull market gathers pace there is still a degree of caution around ICOs.

Despite increased caution, though, there is no question that a fresh ICO boom is just around the corner. Already, we are seeing tentative signs of this. The monthly number of token sales has reached a two-year high, according to CryptoRank, while RootData reports that VCs allocated 52% more to crypto projects in March than in February.

Read more

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Aleksandr Li: Understanding Pik-Swap and the Hybrid Decentralized Wager Platform

Aleksandr Li: Understanding Pik-Swap and the Hybrid Decentralized Wager PlatformN-PIK is an online gambling platform that utilizes its own PIK token, PLYP token to enable players to join raffles, as well as a comprehensive token-based economy to allow players to bet, wager, and win in the best games of skill and chance. The ecosystem’s platforms are already licensed in Uganda and Kenya. Li Aleksandr […]

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Hong Kong Securities Association suggests ICO to boost island’s economy

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Association also suggested that Hong Kong’s authorities could implement Islamic Banking.

The suggestion that Hong Kong could make an “Initial Coin Offering” (ICO) appeared in a list of propositions formulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Association to revitalize Hong Kong's economy.

The document, signed by association president Chen Zhihua, was published on Nov. 29 and included various measures, ranging from routine to bold.

The suggestions include the legal recognition of Islamic finance, and inviting stakeholders from the Islamic world to set up a committee to formulate “Islamic finance guidelines with Hong Kong characteristics.” The tenth point of the list contains only the following line without any details:

“Consider launching an initial coin offering (ICO) mechanism.”

As there is no further explanation, it is unclear whether the association is suggesting the crafting of a comprehensive framework for ICOs or creating an authorized platform. 

The era of ICOs is widely seen as having ended in 2020 due to regulatory pressure and the entrance of institutional investors into the crypto market. The capitalization of ICOs plummeted 95% from its boom year in 2018 to 2019.

Related: The Death of the ICO. Has the US SEC Closed the Global Window on New Tokens?

Cointelegraph sent a press request to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Association for details on the initiative.

Meanwhile, the Hong Kong administration is busy setting in place crypto regulation. In November, it laid down the business requirements for offering tokenized securities and other investment products. Providers are expected to take full responsibility for their tokenized products, ensure effective record-keeping, and demonstrate operational soundness, among other factors.

Magazine: Outrage that ChatGPT won’t say slurs, Q* ‘breaks encryption’, 99% fake web: AI Eye

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Court rules in favor of HelbizCoin investors, class lawsuit to go ahead

A U.S. District Court has upheld claims by HBZ investors that the company acted fraudulently and also asserted that its token violated securities laws.

A United States District Court has allowed a nearly three-year-long class action lawsuit against the creators of HelbizCoin to go ahead, as per a court ruling filed on Sept. 1.

The class action suit was first brought against Helbiz, its CEO Salvatore Palella, and its partners in 2020, with an amended complaint filed in March 2022.

The case involves an Italian electric scooter-sharing company HelBiz that raised $38.6 million in an ICO and issued an ERC-20 token with one of the founders of Ethereum, Anthony Di Iorio, in 2018, according to the complaint.

A group of investors, numbering as many as 20,000, alleged that HelbizCoin was a rug pull and fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme with the firm making false statements and promises to induce people to purchase the coins. They claimed that Helbiz kept most of the money from the ICO for itself.

On Sept. 1, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York partially ruled in favor of investors who filed the class action suit, with the court granting the motions to dismiss in part and denied them in part.

Screenshot from court ruling shared with Cointelegraph

The court however dismissed all claims against certain defendants entirely, including Paysafe, Skrill, Decentral, and Alphabit, finding a lack of personal jurisdiction over Paysafe and Alphabit. The court also dismissed some claims against the remaining defendants for failure to state a claim, including breach of contract, tortious interference, and certain securities claims.

However, Judge Louis Stanton also ruled that plaintiffs adequately stated claims for fraud, price manipulation, violations of securities laws, commodities laws, the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act, and unjust enrichment against some defendants.

“Among other matters, the case found that the ERC-20 token is a security under federal law,” the investor’s lawyer Michael Kanovitz told Cointelegraph.

The investors' lawsuit was initially dismissed by a lower court judge in January 2021, citing a 2010 Supreme Court precedent that limited the extraterritorial reach of federal securities laws, according to a report from Reuters. 

However, the case was revived in October 2021 when a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found the lower court judge erred in its decision, and an amended complaint was filed in March 2022.

Related: SEC vs. Coinbase: New lawyer Patrick Kennedy joins fight

In emailed comments to Cointelegraph, Kanovitz also pointed out that the complaint included a number of charts that use the Ethereum ledger to “prove spoof trading in the ICO.” It also included evidence of multiple "genesis wallets" that were provided to the initial investors in Ethereum, such as Mr. Di Iorio, he said before adding:

“It is a compelling story that shows how blockchain transparency can be used to flush out criminals.”

The complaint alleged that Di Iorio, an advisor to Helbiz, published false and misleading statements about the HelbizCoin ICO in Bitcoin Magazine but did not provide evidence that he made the statements.

“This is a speculative conclusion at best and thus fails to adequately allege that Di Iorio made false or misleading statements,” the ruling read.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

EOS Foundation urges creditors to reject $22M Block.one settlement

The EOS Network Foundation has called on plaintiffs to drop the $22-million settlement with Block.one weeks after initiating a new class action.

Amid the approaching deadline for opting out of the current $22-million settlement with Block.one (B1), the EOS Network Foundation (ENF) has called on plaintiffs to drop the lawsuit.

The ENF took to X (formerly Twitter) on Aug. 8 to encourage plaintiffs to reject the $22-million settlement from Block.one, the firm that was the original seller of EOS (EOS) in a $4-billion initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018.

The ENF argued that the existing settlement “does not adequately compensate” community members for losses caused by Block.one’s “misrepresentations and bad acts.” The ENF emphasized that the settlement amount is a tiny fraction of the amount raised by Block.one as well as $1 billion that it falsely promised to invest in the EOS network and community.

“$22 million is too small a price for Block.one to pay to avoid having to be held to account for their bad acts in the future,” the announcement reads.

Additionally, the settlement bars class action participants’ rights to file new complaints against Block.one and its founders in the future, the ENF stressed, adding:

“The ENF urges community members to opt out of the settlement which will send a strong message to Block.one and to the court that the settlement is entirely inadequate and does not adequately compensate community members.”

According to the foundation, the deadline to opt out of the class action is Aug. 29. “If you fail to opt out by this date you may automatically be included in the class and your future rights to bring a claim against Block.one will be impaired,” the ENF noted.

Related: ‘The SEC has violated due process’ — Coinbase CLO on motion to dismiss lawsuit

The latest statements by the ENF came soon after it officially announced that it was preparing to start legal action against B1 in late July.

ENF founder and CEO Yves La Rose told Cointelegraph that the new action by the ENF could potentially help plaintiffs get higher compensation. “There are no guarantees, which is why this is a personal choice they need to make,” La Rose stated, reiterating that the ENF recommends any person consult their own legal counsel to determine which decision would be best for them.

Magazine: Should you ‘orange pill’ children? The case for Bitcoin kids books

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Block.one ICO damages ‘far beyond’ $22M, ENF founder says

Block.one owes much more to EOS investors than just $22 million after the $4-billion ICO, EOS Network Foundation CEO Yves La Rose believes.

The latest legal action against Block.one (B1), the creator and original seller of EOS (EOS), could potentially help plaintiffs get higher compensation, according to EOS Network Foundation (ENF) founder and CEO Yves La Rose.

On July 25, La Rose officially announced that ENF is preparing a lawsuit against Block.one for its failure to follow through on its $1-billion following its $4.1-billion raise in 2018.

The CEO argued that Block.one’s broken promises to invest $1 billion caused major issues for the EOS community and promised to hold the firm accountable.

As many investors have already been part of another class action against Block.one, a number of those might need to opt out of their current lawsuits, La Rose said.

“They would do that if they aren’t satisfied with the current settlement offer and believe their interests are better suited by opting out, which is a common practice,” the ENF founder told Cointelegraph.

La Rose added that opting out of an old class lawsuit could result in “obtaining a higher payout,” but it could also result in receiving nothing.

“There are no guarantees, which is why this is a personal choice they need to make,” the ENF founder noted, reiterating that the firm recommends any person consult their own legal counsel to determine which path is best for them.

La Rose also emphasized that the amount of settlement in the current class action might not be enough for those who were affected. He stated:

“Not everyone is covered in the current class, and so this new contemplated action also widens the pool of potential participants. Also, the measly $22 million that Block.one offered is pathetic. The damages caused on a $4-billion raise are far beyond what is being offered in reparations.”

Block.one’s EOS initial coin offering (ICO) became one of the largest crowdfunding raises in history, raising as much as $4.1 billion by June 2018 and outstripping Telegram’s $1.7 billion ICO.

By the end of its year-long crowdsale, EOS was trading at around $12, or around 44% down from its peak price recorded in April 2018. The cryptocurrency then experienced a couple of ups and downs, eventually plummeting all the way down below $1. At the time of writing, EOS is trading at $0.74, down roughly 30% over the past year.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried to have campaign donation charge dropped: Prosecutors

Despite a massive decline, EOS is still one of the biggest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, which amounts to $827 million at the time of writing. That makes the EOS cryptocurrency the 54th largest coin by market value, according to CoinGecko.

EOS all-time price chart. Source: CoinGecko

In 2019, Block.one agreed to pay a $24-million civil fine to settle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission over charges that it held an unregistered ICO. A few months later, disgruntled investors started a class-action lawsuit against Block.one, arguing that the firm deceived tokenholders about its financial history, operations and budget, as well as executive compensation, material trends, risk factors and others.

Collect this article as an NFT to preserve this moment in history and show your support for independent journalism in the crypto space.

Magazine: Magazine: Tokenizing music royalties as NFTs could help the next Taylor Swift

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Venture capital’s ICO gambits left Bitcoin ecosystem underfunded – Adam Back

Venture capitalists have favoured ICOs in recent years, but Bitcoin-related startups are seeing renewed interest from investors.

Initial coin offerings (ICOs) may have hampered the development of the Bitcoin ecosystem, with market research reflecting a massive slant towards non-Bitcoin investments by venture capitalists over the past five years.

Blockstream CEO Adam Back highlighted the juxtaposition between the lack of venture investment in Bitcoin in comparison to its dominance of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization in conversation with Cointelegraph’s Joseph Hall at the Lugano Plan B Summer School in Lugano, Switzerland.

Adam Back alongside Cointelegraph's Joseph Hall in Switzerland.

Back, the inventor of Hashcash upon which Bitcoin’s proof-of-work algorithm was derived, pointed to market research published by Trammell Venture Partners which detailed venture capital flows into the ICO craze in the years following the launch of Ethereum and smart contract functionality.

Back said that venture capital spending on ICOs has wound down in recent years after an initial surge in attraction to ‘early liquidity:

“You know, buying discounted tokens, waiting for the company they invested in to do some marketing and then selling the discounted tokens on to retail investors before there's even a product.”

Back added that ICOs had made investors a lot of money, but the phenomenon did not necessarily result in products that people can use and value getting to market because ‘incentives are misaligned’.

Related: What is Bitcoin, and how does it work?

Trammell Ventures’ report surveyed market data which reflects that 97% of venture capital investments over the past few years flowed into ‘crypto’ and not Bitcoin. Back highlighted ICOs, altcoins, discounted tokens and other projects all attracting investors:

“That's kind of shocking if you think about it, because the actual kind of real world uses stickiness, exchange volume is the other way around, it's 90% Bitcoin or more.

Back said that while the Bitcoin space is being underfunded by this category of investors, builders within the ecosystem "produce more innovation and more product value" when compared to ‘crypto’ ICOs that have attracted the lions’ share of VC spending.

The failure of FTX and implosion of decentralized finance projects like Terra/LUNA may have played a role in a shift in VC funding behaviour as well. Back said that non-Bitcoin crypto products had not seen an increase in investments while Bitcoin startups were seeing renewed interest:

“Bitcoin related startup investment, I think particularly at an early stage, had doubled in the last year. So that's a positive.”

Meanwhile Twitter’s co-founder and Bitcoin proponent Jack Dorsey donated $5 million to Bitcoin developer support nonprofit Brink.

Back’s Blockstream and Lightning Labs are attributed as significant resource contributors to the ongoing development of the Bitcoin protocol, both employing eight developers each dedicated to the preeminent cryptocurrency’s maintenance.

The interview is part of an upcoming Cointelegraph documentary about what it’s like to attend a Bitcoin School. Subscribe here (https://www.youtube.com/@cointelegraph) to watch.

Magazine: Bitcoin 2023 in Miami comes to grips with ‘shitcoins on Bitcoin’

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Video of SEC chair praising Algorand resurfaces after recently deeming it a security

Members of the crypto community have called out the SEC Chairman for “shilling” Algorand.

A four-year-old video of United States Securities an Exchange Commission (SEC) chair Gary Genser giving praise to smart contract platform Algorand (ALGO) is circulating on Twitter following the SEC declaring ALGO is an unregistered security.

In the video, Gensler referred to Algorand as a “great technology” while he was contemplating whether a “high performance” smart contract network would be capable of integrating an Uber or Lyft-like application on its platform.

ALGO is one of six tokens that Gensler claimed was an unregistered security in the SEC’s lawsuit against crypto trading platform Bittrex on April 17 that took issue with the Algorand Foundation's initial coin offering (ICO) of ALGO in June 2019.

Cryptocurrency researcher Mason Versluis was one of the first to highlight the video in an April 17 tweet criticizing Gensler for “shilling” ALGO, with others calling out the SEC chair for his apparent hypocrisy.

Gensler’s praise of Algorand was heard by an audience at a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) “Fintech Beyond Crisis” conference held on April 25, 2019.

Gensler worked as a Professor of Global Economics and Management at MIT prior to becoming the SEC’s chair, he acknowledged former MIT colleague and Algorand founder Silvio Micali in the speech — who appeared to be in the crowd.

The video sparked Cinneamhain Ventures partner Adam Cochran to question the long-standing advice from Gensler for crypto firms to register with the regulator.

"Surely if there is a path to register, a world renown MIT professor who personally knows the Chairman of the SEC can figure it out," Cochran tweeted on April 17.

Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett expects Gensler to be questioned over his Algorand comments in his upcoming testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services on April 18.

Other critics choose to mock the situation at hand, highlighting the price decline of ALGO which has seen a 93.8% decline since its launch according to CoinGecko data.

It should be noted that ALGO didn't hit the market until late June 2019, two months after Gensler's speech.

Related: Coinbase and Algorand give divergent reasons for staking reward suspension

Gensler stated in an April 17 tweet that it has been an “honor” to work at the SEC over the last two years and chose to highlight the 1,500 enforcement actions the regulator has undertaken since he's been at the helm.

Gensler was sworn into office as SEC chair on April 17, 2021, after U.S. President Joe Biden’s nomination of Gensler was confirmed by the Senate on April 14, 2021.

Magazine:Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

Thai SEC wants to lift restrictions on initial coin offerings

The latest proposal by the SEC of Thailand follows a series of regulatory changes targeting the digital asset market in the country.

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to soften retail investment restrictions related to initial coin offerings (ICO) to boost digital investments.

The Thai securities regulator is willing to lift the limit of 300,000 baht ($8,800) for asset-backed ICOs per person, planning to allow bigger investments in real estate and infrastructure-backed ICOs, the SEC officially announced on March 30.

The new measures aim to help Thailand boost local technological development due to growth in the capital market and the digital economy, the SEC said, adding:

"The revision of the regulation is aimed at enhancing effective monitoring of digital asset operations and reducing risks that might affect investors, digital asset operators and the market.”

The SEC opened a public hearing for the plan to remove the investment limit, noting that the new measures would increase investors’ risk exposure. The public consultation is scheduled to run until April 27.

Related: SEC’s Gensler seeks $2.4B in funding to chase down crypto ‘misconduct’

The regulator plans to require digital asset operators to apply for permission from the SEC to expand to other businesses. Digital asset operators may also incur additional costs for compliance with new ICO regulations, the SEC noted.

The latest proposal by the SEC of Thailand follows a number of other regulatory amendments targeting the digital asset market in the country.

In early March, the SEC launched another public consultation regarding its draft regulation that would ban crypto firms from offering staking and lending transactions. Previously, the regulator also introduced new crypto custody services, potentially requiring virtual asset service providers to establish a digital wallet management system to guarantee safety of funds.

Magazine: Best and worst countries for crypto taxes — Plus crypto tax tips

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC

New York Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Kucoin and Declares Ethereum a Security

New York Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Kucoin and Declares Ethereum a SecurityOn March 9, 2023, New York attorney general Letitia James announced that her office had once again cracked down on crypto platforms by filing a lawsuit against the Seychelles-based crypto exchange Kucoin. Members of the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) were able to purchase crypto assets, despite the exchange not being registered in the […]

Bitcoin ‘no longer cheap’ — Fidelity revises medium-term outlook for BTC