1. Home
  2. IDO

IDO

Why crypto industry needs venture capital: Q&A with veteran investor

With so many crypto projects being launched, founders are now looking beyond “traditional” crypto fundraising options.

Traditional funding in the crypto space was once considered useless. After all, the industry itself offers different, controversial, but nonetheless, ways to fund a project – initial coin offering (ICO), initial exchange offering (IEO) and the current darlings of offerings – launchpads and initial decentralized exchange (DEX) offerings. 

But with the industry maturing and more startups wanting not only the capital but mentorship to build a working and valuable product, venture capital has emerged as one of the most attractive options. Cointelegraph talked to Li Rongbin, founding partner of SevenX, about why venture capital funding is the next big thing for crypto startups and entrepreneurs.

Tell us about your fund.

Our company, SevenX Ventures, was launched at the beginning of 2020, so we are a relatively young brand. But all of our three founding partners have around six years of experience in crypto VC. We are one of the earliest VCs to invest in DeFi and NFTs in China. We’ve backed such DeFi projects like Dodo, Zerion, Debank, Furucombo, Daomaker, Vega, etc., and NFT-related projects, including YGG, Alchemy NFT, Rangers, and Whale, etc. 

Before SevenX, we’ve separately had our own crypto venture funds, based in Beijing and  Shanghai, which were early investors of some great projects, including Huobi, Tron, NEO and others. We decided to merge into one because we want to really gather our experience and knowledge to better deliver value to our portfolios.

Why do you think the crypto industry needs corporate investment, given that there are many options to fund a project like ICO and IDO, for instance?

We believe in decentralization and really think that a decentralized way of fundraising is cool and helpful. Such kind of fundraising will bring users, publicity and community. But VCs are experienced and have great connections and resources in the industry, which are good for bootstrapping,  

There is a debate around whether to take VCs’ funds as an entrepreneur. Sometimes these firms do little help, and they are also the fastest to dump the project in the bear market. But I think the problem really is in how you deal with the communication and utilization of what VCs have to offer in the most efficient way. 

What kind of companies do you invest in? How do you do your research and due diligence?

We love innovations. We are looking for anything that is innovative enough to change the current paradigm of crypto, and we are not afraid of taking risks.

More specifically, we are investing in projects with logical reasoning ability and founders who clearly know where it is going. We like imagination, but those bold imaginations should be based on logical reasoning and analysis. We think right now the whole industry is in the very early stage, just like the Age of Exploration.

We want to be the backers of those ambitious “captains,” we want to give them support on “the sailing” with “gears like compass, toolbox and knowledge” because we have seen a lot of captains before and used to be captains ourselves (we still are, from an investment perspective).

We will provide the capital needed for the voyage, the safety and even sometimes as a crew member. But we need to back the entrepreneurs who know what they’re doing. And we only invest in captains who really want to find the new continent, not the ones who just want to discover another island and ship some goods back.

For research, we always map a specific market to form an architect structure, for example, what is the foundation of the whole DeFi direction, or how many pillars should it really have? We then analyze the driving forces or impact factors behind it. We have a so-called “get-BTC” model to analyze a product from six different aspects, including governance, economy, team, business model, technology and community.

What matters most when investing in a crypto company – the product or the team?

I would say that at an early stage, the team matters most as products could evolve as time passes by. But people are hard to change. We’re also interested in investing in teams that have seen failures before.

But at a later stage, it is the product that matters most as a lot of things might influence the outcome and lead to failure in this ever-changing market.

What's the most difficult thing about investing in crypto companies and products? What kind of risks are involved?

The most difficult thing is that there is too much happening every day in the space. I often sleep for only six hours a day, trying to catch up with the innovations happening all over the world. Sometimes we need to slow down a little bit and think rather than act fast.

The risk is that we have to realize we are participating in a great experiment in the whole new world. And it’s definitely not risk-resilient. But how do you change the world without experimenting?

What is the most promising direction in the industry right now? Why?

But we are looking at potentially interesting directions like the arweave ecosystem. We think it is the backbone of Web 3.0, NFT infrastructure and the new paradigm of NFT utility. Other potentially interesting developments include DID, credit lending, community decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and any type of technology that could bring crypto to mass adoption.

What kind of assistance do you provide to the companies you invest in? 

A compass, toolkit, a supply station. We provide assistance throughout the entire process of product development – from building tokennomics, designing marketing strategy, setting up business development, to recruiting and providing emotional support.

Did you ever have an unfortunate experience with projects?

For the past two years, so far, so good.

What does the future of investment in crypto look like? Do you think it’ll see an inflow of more institutional investment firms?

More competition from traditional Web 2.0 giant investors and more small two- or three-men teams that root deep in the ecosystem will take place at the same time.  

Learn more about SevenX Ventures

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you with all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor can this article be considered as investment advice.

Square merchants can now convert up to 10% of sales to Bitcoin via CashApp

Animoca Brands raises $5M for NFT marketplace, Quidd

The big funding came via private sale, pre-sale, and the token’s IDO, which sold out in under an hour.

Quidd, a marketplace for digital collectibles and a subsidiary of Animoca Brands, has raised a total of $5 million in private pre-sales and an initial DEX offering (IDO).

The token sale took place on Polkadot project incubator Polkastarter on Nov. 18. The allotment of 2 million QUIDD tokens at a price of US$0.25 per token sold out in under an hour, raising $500,000.

Earlier this month, the private sale of the Ethereum-based QUIDD tokens raised US$4 million from investors including Binance Smart Chain Growth Fund, Genesis Block Ventures, Kingsway, Mind Fund Group Ltd, Sanctor Capital, OneFootball, and other angel investors.

During the Nov. 3 pre-sale on the Animoca Brands’ Launchpad, 1,001 vouchers sold out in 22 minutes. Each voucher cost around $500, bringing the total value of the pre-sale to $500,000. The vouchers can be used to redeem 2,500 QUIDD tokens after May 3, 2022.

Following its successful IDO, the token was made available for trading on the Binance Smart Chain decentralized exchange platform, PancakeSwap. The tokens can currently be traded for Wrapped BNB (WBNB), and a number of Animoca-owned tokens including Tower (TOWER), REVV (REVV), Lympo Market Token (LMT), Prosper (PROS), and Bondly (BONDLY).

The current price of the token is $3.28, representing a 1,212% increase from the IDO price of $0.25. It’s down 31.9% from the all-time high of $4.73 on Nov. 20, and there is a total supply of one billion tokens.

Animoca Brands is a Hong Kong-based game software company and venture capital company specializing in blockchain gaming.

Yat Siu, executive chairman and co-founder of the firm, said that the QUIDD token represents the “evolution of collectibles into digital formats.”

Michael Bramlage, CEO and co-founder of Quidd, added that the token marks Quidd’s movement towards the world of web 3.0.

“Older collectibles markets talk about acquiring users to buy and sell. The QUIDD token helps us build a community of the future.”

Related: Animoca and Harmony Acquire Quidd to Expand Sale of Crypto Collectibles

The Quidd marketplace has 7 million users and over 2.1 billion pieces of nonfungible artworks for sale.

In an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, Quidd described its marketplace as “chain-agnostic,” noting that the token “will give buyers and collectors the choice to mint their collectibles on their preferred networks, such as Ethereum, WAX, and Flow.”

The QUIDD tokens also entitle holders to voting rights on the use of Quidd’s content and licensing budgets.

On Oct. 21, Animoca raised $65 million with more than 43.8 million of newly issued shares at $1.51 per share.

Square merchants can now convert up to 10% of sales to Bitcoin via CashApp

Solana attributes major outage to denial-of-service attack targeting DEX offering

The Solana Foundation says bots spammed the Grape Protocol IDO on Raydium with 400,000 transactions per second, bringing the network to its knees.

Solana has attributed the 17-hour outage it suffered last week to a denial-of-service attack aimed at Grape Protocol’s Sept. 14 initial DEX offering (IDO).

In a Sept. 21 blog post, the Solana Foundation stated that bots spammed the network as Grape launched its IDO on the Solana-based decentralized exchange (DEX) Raydium at 12:00 UTC last Tuesday.

The botting activity overwhelmed the network with a transaction load of 400,000 per second, with Solana noting that “unbounded growth of the forwarder queues and resource-heavy blocks” resulted in a number of forks being automatically proposed to the network.

The attack caused Solana’s network’s validators to crash after running out of memory. As a result the network went offline for roughly 17 hours during Sept. 14 and Sept. 15.

The recovery was led in collaboration between Solana engineers and more than 1,000 validators, with a hard fork being passed after receiving support from 80% of the network’s active stakers.

“This was a coordinated effort by the community, not only in creating a patch, but in getting 80% of the network to come to consensus.”

The foundation estimates that the network was patched, upgraded, and restored to full functionality within 18 hours of Solana going offline.

The post added that the community is still working on providing a detailed “technical post-mortem and root cause analysis report” that will be released in the coming weeks

Related: Smashing crypto adoption barrier? Solana aims to do its own ‘thing’

The price of Solana (SOL) has performed bearishly since posting an all-time high of $213 on Sept. 9. Since then, SOL has pulled back by 39% to change hands for $129 at the time of writing.

The retracement followed a meteoric couple of months for SOL, with the token surging 565% since trading for $32 on July 31.

Square merchants can now convert up to 10% of sales to Bitcoin via CashApp

Kraken rethinks direct listing plan following Coinbase’s lackluster performance

Kraken CEO Jesse Powell is having second thoughts about a direct listing in light of Coinbase going public, and is potentially leaning towards an IPO instead.

Jesse Powell is rethinking Kraken’s plan to go public which is set for late 2022, following the uninspiring performance of Coinbase stock (COIN) since its launch on April 14.

Speaking with Fortune on June 11, Powell stated that in light of the performance on Coinbase’s direct public offering, the firm is now considering an initial public offering (IPO) more “seriously now,” as the firm is looking to avoid potential issues a direct listing presents:

“Not having lock-ups, having billions of dollars of insiders be able to dump their shares, you know, on day one [...] I think it has a dampening effect on the market.”

“And, you know, the IPO is just a very different process,” he added. Kraken began discussing the idea of public listing in March, following Coinbase's plans to pursue a direct listing on the Nasdaq.

Powell then followed that up in April with a timeline suggesting the firm was potentially looking to go public sometime in 2020, and told Cointelegraph that its public listing would be “too big” to go via the route of a special purpose acquisitions company (SPAC).

Related content: To IPO or Not to IPO? SPAC is the question

The roadmap is still not entirely clear, with Powell stating in the interview with Fortune that “we'll see how the market looks in the second half of next year,” before deciding on which method to take for a public listing.

“That's sort of where we're targeting. You know, hopefully by then we have more analyst coverage out and there's just more of a track record of growth for the industry,” he said.

Coinbase’s stock COIN launched with a price of around $327 on April 14, and despite the enthusiasm leading up to the firm going public, its performance has been underwhelming — decreasing around 32.4% since to $221 as of today, according to data from TradingView.

During the Interview, Powell noted that the lackluster performance of COIN may be partly due to the anti-crypto sentiment held in traditional finance and Wall Street. The Kraken CEO thinks that there a lot of players that “actually have a lot to lose” from the success of crypto, and predicted that a lot of players will resist it for “as long as possible,” noting that:

“I think you might be seeing people just facing this cognitive dissonance of becoming increasingly aware of the impending doom that's coming to the legacy financial system.”

 Patrick O’Shaughnessy, an analyst for Raymond James, an independent investment bank with a net of worth $17.76 billion, said in a note to clients regarding COIN on June 10 that:

“We don’t see a structural barrier to entry here and therefore expect significant pricing degradation over time, with growth in non-transaction revenues hard-pressed to offset this.”

From O’Shaughnessy’s perspective, Coinbase is too reliant on transaction fees to generate revenue, and expects the market to provide cheaper alternatives in the near future.

“We view it unlikely that over the long-term retail customers will continue to happily pay a 1%+ transaction fee, particularly if/when trusted financial institutions begin to offer trading and custody,” the analyst noted.

Raymond James has rated COIN as “underperform”, which is the label the firm gives to assets which it expects to underperform the S&P 500, or its sector, within the next six to 12 months and should be sold.

Powell was also quizzed on whether going public through a special purpose acquisitions company (SPAC) would be an option for the crypto exchange, and he reaffirmed the views he'd earlier expressed to Cointelegraph:

“It might have been possible a few years ago, but today I think we're too big to really consider doing a SPAC. So we're still on track for a public listing.”

Square merchants can now convert up to 10% of sales to Bitcoin via CashApp

To ICO or to IDO? That is the question

Initial DEX offerings have a fair bit in common with initial coin offerings but come out on top in cost, effort, and fairness.

Initial DEX offerings are the new initial coin offerings. So, what’s the difference between an IDO and an ICO, other than that one letter? 

A lot actually. 

In some ways, ICOs and IDOs have more in common with each other than they do with initial exchange offerings, which have more than a few features of the traditional initial public offering of stock markets.

While IDOs and IEOs are both listed directly on exchanges — decentralized exchanges, or DEXs, in the case of the former and centralized exchanges for the latter — IDOs are very much a do-it-yourself process like ICOs. 

One big difference between IDOs and ICOs is the amount of money raised. No one sees a 10-figure IDO matching Block.one’s $4 billion ICO or Telegram’s $1.7 billion raise anytime soon. 

Those ICOs also showed the power of the SEC, which generally went easy on companies willing to pay fines and issue mea culpas. Block.one‚ which raised $4 billion, paid a comparatively paltry $24 million fine. Telegram, which fought the SEC, ended up returning $1.2 billion of the $1.7 billion raised and shutting down its TON blockchain.

IEOs, on the other hand, are controlled by exchanges, which act in many ways like the underwriters — middlemen — which lead companies going public on the NYSE or Nasdaq through the process. In IEOs, centralized exchanges like Binance Launchpad and Huobi Prime vet the issuers, provide regulatory and know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) services, and market the sales — for which they charge an arm and a leg. Unlike underwriters, crypto exchanges do not buy out and resell the tokens — in fact, more than a few IEO sales fail, despite the cost.

IDO versus ICO

In both the IDO and the ICO, the token-issuer pays no direct fees to middlemen, which is much more in line with the peer-to-peer ethos of Bitcoin and its successors. That said, IDO launchpads like Polkastarter and Binance Launchpad are changing that as they become more common, but don’t have nearly the cost and control of centralized IEOs

However, every IDO and ICO issuer is responsible for its own marketing, and each must create the smart contract used to sell tokens — including arranging any audits — and carry out its own legal vetting. This likely includes outsourcing AML and KYC compliance, as well as general securities offering registration requirements. 

Then there’s the matter of the tokens. ICO tokens are often minted after the sale, which takes place on the company’s website. That comes with a big cost, as the issuer needs an exchange listing, preferably a top centralized exchange. That can reportedly cost anywhere from $100,000 to several million dollars — which removes a significant downside to IEOs, in which the listing cost is built into the fees.

A benefit of IDOs is that, by their nature, the token is immediately listed on the decentralized exchange on which the offering occurred. That said, despite the decentralized finance (DeFi) boom, even top DEXs like Uniswap or PancakeSwap have far less liquidity than the top centralized exchanges, and tend to be more difficult to use, which can keep some potential buyers away.

One thing that IDOs and ICOs do share is that they rely on knowledgeable community activists to vet the offerings, which either builds community and provides true decentralization, or is a serious Achilles’ heel that leaves prospective buyers short on information, depending on your perspective.

The ICO/IDO debate also has a fairness issue. IDOs shares are immediately tradable — there’s actually no way to impose the lock-up periods frequently used by ICOs. ICOs often offer insiders and early investors favorable terms that aren’t available to regular buyers. That’s not doable in the confines of a smart contract controlled IDO. 

Which isn’t to say IDOs haven’t had their glitches — DeFi lending platform bZx’s mid-2020 Uniswap IDO was dominated by bots that beat every other would-be buyer and jacked prices up before dumping. The DeFi launchpads handle that by limiting buyers to a pre-approved whitelist with a strict per-buyer maximum. But to get whitelisted, buyers must own and hold the launchpad’s native token. 

The benefits of DeFi-ance

That doesn’t change the reality that hot IDOs tend to sell out in seconds. In April, OccamRazer, an IDO launchpad for the decentralized Cardano protocol showed off its chops by holding a hugely successful IDO of its own, selling 200,000 OCC tokens in just 20 seconds. Like many popular IDOs, it was massively oversubscribed, leaving the vast majority of the 150,000 would-be buyers out of luck. 

While IDOs are largely being used by DeFi projects, nothing is stopping centralized crypto companies from taking advantage of their advantages in cost and time — the process is a lot less intensive, making IDOs perfect for small companies.

One non-DeFi company that’s going the IDO route is Estonia-based CoinsPaid, a business-to-business crypto payments solutions company that offers a number of products. Most notable is Cryptoprocessing by CoinsPaid, a white label-ready cryptocurrency payments gateway that accepts more than 30 coins and 20 fiat currencies, promising the best exchange rates. Its ecosystem also includes an institution-focused exchange and OTC desk, cryptoprocessing, and B-to-B and B-to-C hot wallets audited by Kaspersky Lab and 10Guards, and a cryptocurrency explorer. 

Saying that security is a key in all of its offerings, Kaspersky-certified CoinsPaid noted that its business quintupled in 2020, giving it a 5% share of all global on-chain Bitcoin transactions. 

A top global cryptoprocessing company, CoinsPaid was crowned Payment Provider of the Year at the AIBC Dubai show last month. Having secured its position in the payments niche, the fintech is in the process of expanding its services to include decentralized finance (DeFi). 

Launched on June 1, CoinsPaid’s IDO launched CPD, a DeFi cryptocurrency that will serve as a utility token, offering 20% discounts to B-to-B and B-to-C customers who pay in CPD. B-to-B customers get an additional 5%-20% discount when staking CPD, while B-to-C customers get 5%-30%. There is also a 10% B-to-B customer promotion. Using CPD tokens in payment gets a 50% discount on all transactions, and unspecified discounts on all future products. 

On the actual DeFi side of things, CoinsPaid offers a 20% staking APY, a 10%-50% CPD bonus on yield when investing through the CoinsPaid dashboard, and a monthly token burn. The company is selling 16 million of its 800 million CPD. Token swaps are available for ether (ETH), tron (TRX), Binance smart chain tokens (BSC), solana (SOL), and polkadot (DOT). 

Offering coming later this year include a CPD loyalty system and a media site in Q3, with a DeFi dashboard scheduled for Q1 2022.

Learn more about CoinsPaid

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor this article can be considered as an investment advice.

Square merchants can now convert up to 10% of sales to Bitcoin via CashApp