1. Home
  2. v2

v2

Shared Web3 user base could power new social app integrations — Aave CEO

Web3 social layer Lens Protocol aims to power seamless connectivity of applications across blockchain and non-blockchain platforms.

The latest version of Web3 social layer Lens Protocol has been released, introducing improved functionality to support new use cases and shared monetization for its growing Web3 user base.

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) firm Aave Companies announced Lens Protocol v2 on July 17 during EthCC in Paris, with the code powering the protocol reworked to enable improved composability, configurability and functionality.

Aave and Lens Protocol founder Stani Kulechov told Cointelegraph that Lens is a decentralized protocol built on Polygon featuring a technology stack that allows developers to build and deploy Web3 social apps, as well as allowing Web3 social features to be integrated with existing Web2 and mobile experiences:

“Our vision is for Lens Protocol to enable all applications to connect seamlessly across blockchain and non-blockchain applications, and reward both individuals and the collective shared network.”

According to Kulechov, Lens has around 119,000 Web3 users in its beta, with a lengthy waiting list. Applications built on Lens can leverage this same audience, which is a key component of the protocol’s social graph architecture.

The protocol provides an alternative to conventional Web2 networks and their centralized database models, which rule out portability. As Lens’ core documentation details, Web2 platforms fight a zero-sum game for user attention, with one’s gain equaling another’s loss.

Related: Web3 social media protocol launches scaling solution to provide instant posts

Lens Protocol allows users to own and carry personal data across connected or integrated applications. Kulechov added that Lens is designed to enable human engagement across the internet while benefiting contributors and the wider ecosystem:

“We are still in the early days of Web3 social. Lens has been working with builders and content creators to attract them to develop consumer apps and publish content on Lens.”

Kulechov said that it’s traditionally difficult for new social platforms to compete with incumbents for audience and funding. Lens intends to remove some risk associated with the “cold start” problem that developers face, with ecosystem apps sharing the same Web3 audience.

He added that the recently launched Threads is an example of how Instagram leveraged its existing audience to attract them to a new app that competes with Twitter.

“By utilizing their built-in Instagram users, Threads demonstrated the power of shared social networks when launching a new app. Only, in this case, the shared network is closed — allowing only Meta apps to benefit.”

V2 of the protocol is expected to deliver more ways to share value, allowing users to choose specific algorithms and move freely between communities and applications. For Kulechov, the prospect of new social experiences built on Lens remains a main draw card as the protocol’s shared user base allows new apps or integrations to leverage the existing network.

Related: Unstoppable Domains adds .eth domains through Ethereum Name Service

Kulechov also stressed that Lens is not designed to be a “front-end” app but rather a shared network protocol that hands value back to users, creators and developers.

“Lens utilizes blockchain, smart contracts, decentralized storage and NFTs to reimagine social networks that are open and diverse, offering different types of experiences and communities.”

The likes of Unstoppable Domains and the Ethereum Name Service have driven the uptake of Web3 decentralized domain names that act as self-custodial digital identities and human-readable wallets over the past two years.

Collect this article as an NFT to preserve this moment in history and show your support for independent journalism in the crypto space.

Magazine: Tokenizing music royalties as NFTs could help the next Taylor Swift

PayPal withdraws user protection for NFT transactions

NFT Marketplace Looksrare Launches Version 2, Cutting Protocol Fees by 75% and Introducing Bulk Purchases

NFT Marketplace Looksrare Launches Version 2, Cutting Protocol Fees by 75% and Introducing Bulk PurchasesLooksrare, the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, has launched version two, also known as v2, which reduces protocol fees by 75%. According to statistics from Dune Analytics, Looksrare was the tenth-largest NFT marketplace in terms of trader count during the past week. NFT Market Protocol Looksrare Launches v2 NFT marketplace Looksrare announced the launch of version […]

PayPal withdraws user protection for NFT transactions

Axie Infinity Surpasses $4 Billion in All-Time Sales, Team Removes SLP Rewards From Classic Game Mode

Axie Infinity Surpasses  Billion in All-Time Sales, Team Removes SLP Rewards From Classic Game ModeAfter recording more than $4 billion in all-time sales, Axie Infinity announced the game’s classic mode will no longer allow users to obtain smooth love potion (SLP), as SLP rewards have been added to the new Origin ranked gameplay mode. The team also introduced non-fungible token (NFT) runes and charms that can be minted on […]

PayPal withdraws user protection for NFT transactions

CryptoPunks community reacts to the ongoing copyright battle between V1 and V2

Although the collection is no longer deemed authentic by Larva Labs, its creators alleged sold 210 ETH worth of CryptoPunks V1 when the wrapped versions first gained traction.

During its initial release, 10,000 CryptoPunks were sold and made it to the secondary market before users discovered a critical smart contract exploit that made it possible for Punks' buyers to withdraw their Ether (ETH) post-purchase. As a result, creator Larva Labs withdrew recognition of the V1 collection, fixed the exploit, and released the V2 Punks collection we have now. Though, they've also sent mixed messages about the collection by selling off dozens of their own V1 Punks.

The battle over the copyright of the CryptoPunks V1 collection is heating up as the images recently gained in market value, with Larva Labs filing a DMCA take-down notice to OpenSea and members of the V1 community striking back with their own. To complicate the matter, Larva Labs purposefully coded the smart contract to be irrevocable, and one collection (V1) could not have been destroyed without also eliminating the other (V2). The topic remains deeply controversial within both communities.

With the help of CryptoPunks V1's community admin, @irishnftgal, Cointelegraph spoke to Brittany Kaiser, co-founder of Own Your Data. In late Jan 2022, Brittany bought a v1 CryptoPunk on OpenSea, which she believes is a "true piece of NFT history" produced by Larva Labs as one of the first punks avatars:

"I was excited to hear that a group of crypto activists and brilliant developers, some of who call themselves "NFT archaeologists," decided to build an ERC-721 wrapper to make the original V1 CryptoPunks token contract tradable on modern NFT marketplaces."

According to Brittany, she was "shocked and dismayed" to discover that after Larva Labs profited from selling about 40 wrapped CryptoPunks V1 on Opensea for 210 ETH, its creators allegedly turned around. Instead, they took deliberate action to undermine the authenticity and traceability of the very same CryptoPunks V1 collection. "The founders have said publicly for years that these tokens are part of the original," says Brittany.

Brittany thinks the best outcome for Larva Labs would be to "take responsibility and ownership of these blockchain assets" that they put on the market. "Revoking the DCMA would be a good start, and a public apology would be even better," she says.

Efforts from the V1 community to make themselves heard have fallen on deaf ears among many members of the V2 community. In its official Discord, user lookinrare#0911 wrote:

"I mean, we can call them a gamble, but at the end we always knew V1 [punk] were not legit punks; they were simply artifacts that led to the creation of punks. So they have a place in history, but I doubt that place is worth 1k ETH, lol."

Another user, OG!#8654, wrote:

"I think Larva Labs should aggressively attack with litigation. V1s have been suffering ever since. Their floor price is down to 9 ETH, and hardly anyone is talking about them anymore. I do think the misinformation issue has taken another wrong step now. They changed their name to 'CryptoPunks V1' from 'Wrapped V1 CryptoPunks'. This is a blatant attempt to mislead people."

Issues regarding the authenticity of the collection aren't simply about the philosophy of NFTs; they have ample financial consequences. On the one hand, efforts to delegitimize the V1 collection have, in the past, caused their floor prices to fall, leading to devastating losses among V1 owners. But on the other hand, legitimizing the V1 collection would suddenly increase the total supply of CryptoPunks from 10,000 to 20,000. This would decrease their scarcity and potentially cause the price of V2 punks to decline, albeit to the joy of V1 punk owners, who will potentially see the price of their NFTs increase due to newfound recognition.

PayPal withdraws user protection for NFT transactions

Decentralized Exchange Uniswap Reveals Protocol Version 3 With New Automated Elements

Decentralized Exchange Uniswap Reveals Protocol Version 3 With New Automated ElementsRoughly 28 months ago, the decentralized exchange (dex) Uniswap version one (v1) was released and then in May 2020, version two was launched with new features. The dex is by far the largest decentralized trading platform among its competitors, as the exchange swapped $7.1 billion during the last seven days. On March 23, Uniswap launched […]

PayPal withdraws user protection for NFT transactions