1. Home
  2. Art

Art

Californian lawmaker proposes legislation to protect actors from AI clones

Californian Assembly Member Ash Kalra labeled the bill as a “common sense requirement” to help protect the work of actors, artists and entertainers.

A Californian lawmaker has introduced a bill to protect actors, artists, and entertainers from artificial intelligence, by mandating employment contracts to include informed consent when it comes to digital replicates.

Ash Kalra, an Assembly Member of the State of California — the lawmaker behind the bill — argued that generative AI presents a “real threat” to workers in the entertainment industry and its use should be banned unless a bargaining agreement between the parties is made.

The legislation, Assembly Bill 459, will eventually be assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill proposed by Kalra, which will then be put before the chamber for a vote.

Kalra explained in a Sept. 13 statement that “common sense requirements” like those in bill AB 459 need to be implemented to protect these workers:

“Mandating informed consent and representation will help ensure workers are not unknowingly at risk of losing the right to their digital self, and with it, their careers and livelihoods.”

The bill was also supported by Screen Actors Guild and American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) — a United States-based labor union representing over 100,000 media professionals around the world.

Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, the guild’s national executive director and chief negotiator stressed that protecting an actor’s digital image through consent-based laws is now a necessity.

“We believe that our members must maintain full control over the use of their digital selves through informed consent, and this is key if they are to be able to build and sustain a career,” he explained.

Crabtree-Ireland said AI copycats can lead to “abusive” and “exploitative” practices and that legislation will play a key role in curtailing such conduct:

"We see protection against the unjust transfers of these rights to be an imperative against potential abusive or exploitative practices. We are deeply concerned by the proliferation of AI-created audio and video content without full consent, and this legislation is an important step to ending these dangerous practices.”

Related: AI deepfakes are getting better at spoofing KYC verification — Binance exec

The Screen Actors Guild has been behind a nearly four-month-long ongoing strike action in Hollywood over base compensation, better working conditions and other contentious issues.

One of the issues raised revolves around AI and its use, with the workers demanding stricter protections against artificial intelligence and larger royalties for their work, known in the industry as residuals.

In a recent interview with Variety, U.S. actor Sean Penn took a shot at many studios' desire to utilize actors' likenesses and voices for future AI use.

“So you want my scans and voice data and all that. OK, here’s what I think is fair: I want your daughter’s, because I want to create a virtual replica of her and invite my friends over to do whatever we want in a virtual party right now.

"Would you please look at the camera and tell me you think that’s cool?” he asked. 

Magazine: AI Eye: AI’s trained on AI content go MAD, is Threads a loss leader for AI data?

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Binance scouts art for Pierre Gasly’s F1 helmet at Abu Dhabi GP

Binance announced a helmet design competition to shortlist the winning art, which will be used as the helmet artwork of Gasly, who won the 2020 Italian Grand Prix.

The winner of a new art competition hosted by Binance will see their design featured on the helmet of racing driver Pierre Gasly from the Alpine Formula One team during the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix on Nov. 26, 2023.

Crypto exchange Binance announced a helmet design competition to shortlist the winning art, which will be used as the helmet artwork for Gasly, who won the 2020 Italian Grand Prix.

Gasly described the collaboration with Binance as an opportunity “to engage with both the F1 and crypto communities in a creative and innovative way.” Participants need not be Binance users, opening up the floor to non-crypto F1 fans as well. The last date for submitting helmet designs is Sept. 8, with the winner declared by Sept. 15.

According to the crypto exchange, helmet designs that reflect Binance’s values and innovative ethos while engaging the motorsport community stand the greatest chance of winning the contest. Gasly stated:

“I can’t wait to show off the winning design that will showcase our shared innovative spirit that will accompany me in the race at the prestigious Abu Dhabi Grand Prix.”

The winner will also receive a replica helmet personally signed by Gasly. Binance has also partnered with other influential celebrities, such as soccer legend Cristiano Ronaldo and leading football clubs, to help improve fan engagement.

Related: Binance excludes Banco de Venezuela from P2P payments

Amid massive regulatory hurdles that grip Binance, the crypto exchange continues collaborating with A-list celebrities to maintain relevance among crypto investors.

On Aug. 21, Binance revealed a partnership with legendary singer The Weekend to facilitate a Web3-powered concert tour — After Hours Til Dawn.

Fans in Australia will be offered two nonfungible tokens (NFTs) — Souvenir NFTs and Tour NFTs — that would allow for new avenues of engagement with The Weekend. As part of the deal, Binance committed to donating $2 million to The Weeknd’s XO Humanitarian Fund.

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market: Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Universal Music and Google in talks over deal to combat AI deep fakes: Report

Universal Music and Google are reportedly in negotiations over a tool that would allow for the creation of AI tracks using artists’ likenesses in a legal way.

Universal Music Group — one of the world’s leading music companies — and Google are in negotiations to license melodies and vocal tracks of artists to be used in songs generated by artificial intelligence (AI), according to a report from the Financial Times. 

The talks have been confirmed by what the FT reports are “four people familiar with the matter.” The companies are reportedly aiming to create a partnership between the music industry and Big Tech in order to manage the rampant emergence of AI-generated deep fakes.

Mainstream AI usage has sparked concern among major music industry leaders due to the amount of “deep fakes” using musicians’ likenesses. Clips of AI-generated Drake and Kanye West began to go viral around April. Many have since been taken down.

Reportedly, the discussions between the two industry giants are still in the early stages, with no impending product launch or guidelines. However, the FT sources say the goal is to develop a tool for creating tracks legally with copyrights rightly attributed. 

The sources said that artists would have the right to opt in for their voices and music to be used. Another source claimed that Warner Music Group (WMG) has also been in conversation with Google regarding a similar product.

Cointelegraph reached out to WMG for further information but has not received a response.

Related: Music with AI elements can win a Grammy, Recording Academy CEO says

In April, Universal Music Group asked streaming services like Spotify to remove all AI-generated content due to copyright infringement.

A few weeks later, Spotify said it was ramping up policing of the platform and began actively taking down content in violation.

However, some artists are fully on board with their voices being used in AI-generated music. Grimes said she’s eager to be a “guinea pig” for this type of content and will split royalties 50/50 with the creators. 

She also created Elf Tech, alongside a team of developers, which is her own voice simulation program available for public use.

Google and Meta have recently launched their own tools called Music LM and AudioCraft to create music and audio using generative AI.

Many in creative industries are worried about the implications of AI being used to create artistic and creative products. However, in an interview between Cointelegraph and the CEO of the Recording Academy, he said AI can be used as a “creative amplifier.”

Magazine: BitCulture: Fine art on Solana, AI music, podcast + book reviews

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

The Sandbox and the British Museum bring art and history to the metaverse

The partnership between The Sandbox, the British Museum and laCollection intends to make artifacts in the museum’s collection more accessible.

The Sandbox metaverse development platform announced on July 27 that it would be partnering with the British Museum to bring it into the metaverse. 

The blog revealed that the partnership aims to create new “immersive experiences” for users to discover world history. A range of digital collectibles will be generated that reflect various collections within the museum.

Sebastien Borget, chief operating officer and co-founder of The Sandbox, called it an opportunity to share the museum’s collections with new audiences.

“This is a great opportunity for The Sandbox players, regardless of where they are, to learn about and enjoy the amazing collections of human history, art, and culture in the British Museum.”

The collaboration also includes a Web3 platform called laCollection, the museum’s licensing partner, which has also worked with leading museum institutions around the world to bring art into the digital space. 

While this moment may be the first foray into the Web3 space for the British Museum, it is not the first time a major museum has found its way into the metaverse. 

Related: Will museums of the future just be giant NFT galleries?

This past spring, the Centre Pompidou, one of the top museums in France for modern art and home of the first collection of modern art in Europe, opened a new exhibition in the growing intersection of art and blockchain. 

The museum introduced pieces from some of the world’s most coveted nonfungible token (NFTs) collections, including CryptoPunks and Autoglyphs, as part of a permanent exhibition.

Prior to that, one of Ukraine’s oldest art museums, the Kharkiv Art Museum, launched an NFT collection as a fundraiser to maintain its operation and preserve its cultural heritage.

The Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp in Belgium was Europe’s first museum to tokenize a classic art masterpiece valued at millions of euros.

On the other side of things, last year, the metaverse platform Decentraland held Metaverse Art Week, which included various interactive exhibitions of digital art. This included an immersive experience surrounding the life and works of renowned painter Frida Kahlo with never-before-seen digitalized art.

Magazine: BitCulture: Fine art on Solana, AI music, podcast + book reviews

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Faroe Islands postal service issues NFT-embedded stamps

The postal service of the autonomous territory of the Faroe Islands has become the latest national postal service to issue a collection of NFT collector stamps.

The Faroe Islands have issued a new series of digital “crypto stamps,” with a digital copy stored on the blockchain as a nonfungible token (NFT) while still serving as actual postage. 

On June 23, the Posta Faroe Islands’ official website for issuing postage announced that the autonomous region issued its first collection of crypto stamps called Stamps of Maybe in collaboration with VariusSystems. 

Stamps of Maybe crypto stamps. Source: Posta Faroe Islands

According to the postal service, each physical stamp has a digital version stored on the blockchain, which allows users to have a say in the creation of the stamp, adding to the rarity. 

Michael Dorner, the CEO of VariusSystems, said after attending a summit with the Universal Postal Union at the United Nations, that he could see countries worldwide are interested in new use cases of emerging technologies.

“We felt an enormous interest not only in the NFT stamps but in blockchain technology […] and how this digital revolution with decentralized blockchains can help their businesses grow and stay ahead of the curve.”

The stamps in the Faroe Islands’ collection are linked to the local Faroese weather station, Veðurstova Føroya, and use real-time weather data at the time of activation to influence how the digital version of the stamps appears. 

Related: German intelligence service launches dog-themed NFTs to fetch cyber talent

This is not the first time blockchain technology has been employed by a postal service to create stamps as NFTs and reinvent the idea of stamp collecting, also known as philately.

The Netherlands’ PostNL and Austria’s PostAG have also issued NFT crypto stamps. PostAG’s first editions launched in 2019 on the Ethereum blockchain, with another iteration in 2021 adding near-field communication chip functionality for additional verification.

At the time, Dorner told Cointelegraph that the combination of NFT technology and the legacy of stamp collection creates a “collector 3.0.”

Magazine: ‘Holy shit, I’ve seen that!’ — Coldie’s Snoop Dogg, Vitalik and McAfee NFTs: NFT Creator

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Slow Food: Kenny Schachter reflects on blockchain art’s past, present and future

NFTs might never boom at quite the same pitch they once did. With his first solo show in 25 years, Kenny Schachter sought to demonstrate how that’s a good thing.

With crypto in a state of turbulent flux, a demographic of nonfungible token (NFT) detractors in the fine art world might feel trigger-happy to, at last, declare the industry down for the count. 

Meanwhile, artist, critic, dealer, educator and outspoken NFT proponent Kenny Schachter is celebrating the conclusion of Slow Food — his first New York City art exhibition in 25 years — at The NFT Gallery on Manhattan’s Lower East Side, fresh off the heels of headlining NFT Art Day ZRH in Zurich, Switzerland, coinciding with the iconic annual Art Basel art fair, less than 50 miles away.

In June 2022, Schachter had just presented the first-ever NFT booth wall at Art Basel with Galerie Nagle Draxler, expanding the acceptance of NFTs just before profile pictures became the face of their demise. Soon after, Schachter was spotted among the art world elite in Hydra, Greece, celebrating zeitgeist sculptor Jeff Koon’s first token drop with Pace Gallery.

Schachter told Cointelegraph that while his commitment to the intersection of blockchain and art hasn’t faltered since then, “it’s hardened.” The contentious art-world rabble rouser hails from a working-class Long Island, New York family. He studied philosophy, then law — worked in fashion and on the stock market floor — all before stepping foot in his first art gallery in his late 20s or making his name as an art market reporter. Schachter became an artist before the millennium turned, exhibiting his first computer animation in 1993 and producing digital prints as the decade ensued.

“As far as I’m concerned, I’m involved in art,” Schachter said. “That’s all I care about, more than pretty much everything, except for perhaps my kids.” Rather than encapsulating Schachter’s full oeuvre, Slow Food, which closed on June 17, focused on the artist’s most recent blockchain forays: a collaborative, evolving rumination titled Open Book, his new blockchain-based game Pop Principle, and a sculpture about the insidious trend of dinosaur bones being sold through art auction houses. An NFT accompanied each artwork — underpinning them all.

Riding out the booms and busts

When Schachter caught wind of NFTs in 2020, he brushed them off as another form of money before recognizing solutions for difficulties dogging his practice — wrapped in a blockchain bow.

Of course, digital art had long languished in the absence of a practical means to sell and trade it. A number of galleries offering digital artworks in their booths at Art Basel as of 2022 still handed the pieces off after purchase as a file on a flash drive, authenticated based on file size.

Even before NFTs, digital art had been pigeonholed in the manner of other mediums, like performance. Although NFTs gained fame only once artists started making big money, Schachter saw a greater chance to expand his audience beyond the narrow-minded art world.

Several standalone artworks complemented Schachter’s larger projects across Slow Food, like “NFT Gimmicks,” a two-part piece including a fine art print that immortalized a snide tweet Schacter made in reply to Dot Pigeon’s April announcement that the artist was quitting NFTs due to rampant speculation — alongside the actual balaclava Schachter is seen wearing in the post.

“NFT Gimmicks” artwork on view in Slow Food. Source: Vittoria Benzine

“First of all, he’s made millions, probably, off his NFTs,” Schachter told Cointelegraph of Pigeon’s headline-making move. “If I sell an NFT, whether it was $5 or $25,000, that’s a social contract between me and the collector. I have an obligation to support what I’ve done.” He noted that Crypto Mutts, a profile picture collection Schachter founded to mock Bored Ape Yacht Club, will likely end up in his will, to ensure the project survives after he’s not around to maintain it.

Money is nice, but Schachter swears up and down it’s not driving him — he recently opted to forego royalties from resales. Instead, the artist emphasized that his faith relies on the community that NFTs build around his practice and the connections the space lends itself to.

Recent: The Hinman docs: Implications for XRP, SEC credibility and more

The artist had to learn fast about blockchain in his efforts to get involved. He initiated a virtual mentorship with an avid NFT collector and Google executive based in Singapore. “Every two or three weeks, I would sit there like a child with a pen and a paper,” Schacter recalled of their sessions. “I ended up making an artist out of him, putting him in an NFT show I curated at Nagle Draxler in Cologne in 2021.”

Similarly, Schachter’s more far-reaching projects across “Slow Food” require people to make them function. Open Book began last summer while he was co-authoring The NFT Book. Inspired by the social media responses he got for input while helping pen the book, Schachter curated 20 disparate artists to contribute stances on NFTs — some positive, some critical — for Open Book. Those quotes oscillated on screens across Slow Food, with some from Schachter himself. The show allocated a room where guests could contribute before it goes live on NFT market Async Market this month.

Schachter calls the project “a book that doesn’t have an ending, nor a middle for that matter. But there’s a beginning. It tells a story of a field radically transforming in real time.”

Playing further

His blockchain game, Pop Principle, runs on the high-end digital art streaming service and collecting source Daata. It took shape in early 2022. Originally titled Digital Duel: Crypto vs Canvas, the game’s new iteration pits teams of vocal NFT supporters and detractors from the fine art world — artists, writers, curators, dealers and influencers — all against each other.

Each round of Pop Principle will introduce new teams with new characters on either side, all available to mint in open editions. Collectors mint as many of their favorite characters as they can afford to in order to support that figure and their team. Whichever team gets the most mints wins, but the real crown goes toward whichever collector holds the most copies of the winning character — that collector gets a unique Schachter sculpture in real life. To celebrate Pop Principle’s inaugural round, which closed June 17, the top 50 holders all received an airdropped NFT.

“The concept changed from a battle to a reflection of the fact that life — in art and beyond — has been reduced to a popularity contest,” Schachter said, “measured by likes, followers and money.” While there’s no role-playing or hand-to-hand combat, it was fun to watch art dealer Larry Gagosian, whose gallery some regard as the art world’s evil empire, lob stacks of bills at opponents like famed artists Refik Anandol and Beeple, in a montage on view at Slow Food.Sculptures of this round’s protagonists punctuated the show — Beeple greeted visitors, while teammates Anandol and Nigerian artist Osinachi conversed with the round’s sole neutral party, curator Hans Ulrich Obrist, near the show’s rear.

Osinachi, Obrist and Anandol sculptures at the back of Slow Food. Source: Vittoria Benzine

The figures all had big eyes, attention to detail and a real sense of life. They felt like Schachter’s distinct take on the infamous artist KAWS’s signature style, although artists are notoriously crabby about being compared with each other. Schachter’s go-to fabricator in China brought his digital designs to freestanding, 3D existence.

Perhaps surprisingly, David Hockney hasn’t yet factored into Pop Principle. In 2021, Hockney, the highest-valued painter alive, called NFTs “silly little things” for “crooks and swindlers.”

However, Hockney’s recent series of iPad drawings — the subject of a hyped Pace Gallery exhibition in Chelsea, Manhattan, in winter 2022 — would likely benefit from blockchain elements.

“Would you rather own a $100,000 outputted photograph,” Schachter asked, “or would you rather own the high res file from which he made it, in which case you could make a tapestry, you could make a painting in China for $100, you can make a photograph or a lightbox or projection or keep it on your phone, do whatever you want?”

That’s precisely how “Missionary Position,” a tapestry featured in Slow Food depicting Mother Theresa in a robe adorned with Ethereum insignias, came to be. Schachter got in touch with an Albanian artisan through his network, who wove his digital design into an art object.

“Missionary Position: ETH (tapestry version)” from Slow Food. Source: Kenny Schachter

Fine art recoils — even from practical applications

NFT art might never boom at quite the same pitch it once did. Schachter says that’s a good thing. It could benefit the space by taking the focus off the very behaviors from the traditional art and finance spheres that NFT proponents claim they’re trying to buck — placing the focus back on the possibilities. Blockchain offers many practical applications relevant to fine art beyond just hype, revenue, new audiences and new understandings of art as an idea rather than an object. 

For example, it can create an irrevocable record of provenance, which could foster a little more transparency about how many — and maybe whose — hands an artwork has passed through.

Why, then, are some art industry figureheads raring to dance on the blockchain’s grave?

“The art world is like a smelly dog pissing on a tree,” Schachter said. “When they see another dog coming by, the first thing they want to do is piss on the piss that the other dog just did. When the art world sees a new means, a new technology, they see platforms that fully function without their input, they get very defensive and very territorial.”

“Art is a zero-sum game, generally speaking, where one person or entity succeeds at the expense of another.” 

More money for Nifty Gateway means less money for galleries — unless they’re creating new audiences. But art is ephemeral, relational. Prices are based on previous prices, and acclaim comes from proximity to superstars. There’s a lot at stake in the ruse that these emperors are clothed.

“When I found out about the art world, the first impression I had was people swinging from the chandelier, drinking absinthe and going to orgies,” he said. “Boy, was I in for a slap in the face.”

Magazine: Opinion: GOP crypto maxis almost as bad as Dems’ ‘anti-crypto army’

No matter, though. Schachter’s pressing forward. “Slow Food,” he said, was a dry run for his debut solo museum exhibition at the Francisco Carolinum in Linz, Austria, opening in September.

“Nobody offered me a fucking show when I was in the art world for 30 years,” Schachter balked. “I got offered a show and had success in the NFT space. In the art world, success affirms success. By any means necessary, will I pursue my interest and my goals.”

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Sotheby’s auctions off Dmitri Cherniak’s ‘The Goose’ NFT from 3AC collection for $6.2M

Su Zhu and Kyle Davies originally purchased ‘The Goose’ digital artwork in August 2021 for roughly $5.8 million in Ether.

Sotheby’s auction house has sold a piece of digital artwork from the collection of collapsed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) for more than $6 million.

According to auction records updated June 15, Dmitri Cherniak’s artwork ‘The Goose’ sold for roughly $5.4 million in addition to Sotheby’s premium fees, totaling just over $6.2 million. The nonfungible token (NFT) artwork was part of 3AC’s digital portfolio assembled in 2021. Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, 3AC's co-founders,  purchased ‘The Goose’ in August 2021 for 1,800 Ether (ETH), roughly $5.8 million at the time.

Other pieces in the collection auctioned by Sotheby’s included CryptoPunks #291, #6574 and #8950, as well as Autoglyph #218 from Larva Labs. Reports on social media suggested the Punks sold for between $75,000 and $90,000 each.

As one of the first major auction houses to launch a dedicated marketplace for digital artwork and NFTs in 2021, Sotheby’s has sold many pieces relevant to crypto users for upward of millions of dollars. An NFT of the first tweet from former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has passed through the auction house, as well as the original manuscript of the book that coined the term 'metaverse.’

Related: Sotheby’s relaunch Glitch digital art sale, newbie gamer uncovers $49K NFT and more

Once a leader in the crypto space, 3AC went bust amid the 2022 market crash, and Zhu’s and Davies' whereabouts have since been largely unknown. In April, the duo backed the launch of a new exchange — OPNX — which claimed to be aimed at “help[ing] the industry” amid the collapse of platforms including FTX and Celsius. However, disgruntled 3AC investors have continued to target the pair through various court procedures in the United States and abroad.

Magazine: NFT art pioneer wants to upload her brain so she can live forever: Josie Bellini, NFT Creator

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Web3 community-building meets music technology at Wavelengths Summit 2023

Crypto natives and newbies alike came together to build community and share alpha on the latest in music technology and decentralization.

Web3 has become one of the hottest buzzwords in the music industry, with everyone from independent musicians to major label artists dropping nonfungible token (NFT) collections and throwing concerts in the metaverse. But for many, the actual use cases and potential of these technologies remain shrouded in mystery and confusion.

On May 6, Water & Music held its inaugural Wavelengths Summit, a one-day event bringing together musicians, industry executives, artist managers, researchers and technologists to explore the bleeding edge of music technology and democratize access to information. On the agenda were talks about blockchain-based communities, the growing influence of artificial intelligence on the music industry and the future of artist revenue streams.

Water & Music is a collaborative music technology research network founded in 2016 by writer Cherie Hu as a free newsletter. It has since evolved to encompass a paid membership structure, an extensive online collaboration network and in-person events. Its research often touches upon Web3 and how blockchain impacts the music industry.

“I think the music industry, in particular, has suffered from information silos,” Hu told Cointelegraph. “If you’re trying to figure out how fans interact with your music in a holistic way, it’s actually a huge challenge.” Enter Water & Music, which seeks to empower its community with the knowledge needed to thrive in the digital era.

Community

A central focus of both Water & Music as an organization and its Wavelengths Summit was building a sense of community. The event’s emphasis on the importance of community-building in music and Web3 was ever-present, from the topics chosen for discussion — including sessions titled “Music Community Building and Decentralization: Lessons from History” and “URL to IRL: Uniting Music Communities Online and Offline” — to the way the event itself was hosted and organized.

For instance, Hu opened the summit by laying out four ground rules for positive community-building: “Be kind and respectful,” “Stay critical, “No shilling,” and “Have fun!” She also announced that there would be no panels; instead, experts would facilitate conversations, with audience members encouraged to jump in at any point. Talks on the main stage were accompanied by a large screen displaying live comments and questions from audience members via an app called Slido.

“I think what we were really aiming for is recreating the magic of our Water & Music Discord,” Diana Gremore, Water & Music’s events director, told Cointelegraph. “We have such a thoughtful, articulate, critical, passionate, curious community, so we wanted to do our best to facilitate how that URL community translates into an IRL experience.”

Web3 community building for musicians

Throughout the day, many of the conversations touched on how Web3 and blockchain technologies are being explored in the world of music. During the “Music Community Building and Decentralization” session, participants discussed how online communities such as decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are the next step in a long history of decentralization.

As pointed out by Austin Robey, co-founder of Metalabel — which is building a blockchain-based platform for collaborative artist releases — on-chain voting and governance are digital versions of what real-world communities have always done. Social spaces are always governed, and communities are always decision-making. And while DAOs may be subject to “code,” real-world communities have always been subject to social “codes.”

The discussion was moderated by Kaitlyn Davies, membership lead at Friends With Benefits — a social DAO for creatives — and head of curatorial partnerships at Refraction — a DAO for artists and creators with a particular focus on live music events. Davies told Cointelegraph that the preexisting decentralization in music communities helps explain why so many in the music world gravitate toward Web3.

“You see a lot of people who have always been interested in decentralized ways of organizing or sort of left-of-center means of organizing look to this technology to keep doing their work — not even to get bigger or to cast a further net but just to enable what they were already doing,” she said, adding:

“Cultivating a scene or a community, that’s really important, and that’s what drives culture. [...] My hope still is that decentralized tech helps us do that better and helps us do that in more equitable ways.”

During the “Web3: Balancing Niche and Mainstream on the Road to Adoption” session, participants discussed the importance of first understanding one’s community before launching crypto music projects. Melanie McClain, a Web3 consultant and founder of Blurred Lines — a community of Web3 tastemakers supporting left-of-center Black music — said that if fans want free shows, artists can experiment with NFTs that give collectors free access to concerts. And if the artist blows up, that free-performance NFT will suddenly become much more valuable.

Related: Music NFTs are helping independent creators monetize and build a fanbase

Speaking to Cointelegraph, McClain said that crypto-native and crypto-newbie artists alike could use blockchain tech to build stronger communities, but each approach must be tailored. “They have to be self-aware,” she said. If a musician’s community is not native to Web3, “they might not say words like NFTs or social tokens. They can lead the conversation in other ways while still using the tools in the back end.”

Many facilitators and other attendees expressed that Web3 solutions offer particularly unique advantages for musicians, with Gremore telling Cointelegraph that “one of the biggest strengths of [Web3] is the ability to build community and sustain community.”

Perhaps part of the reason for this is that blockchains are generally designed for efficiency. According to Hu, this allows artists and their teams to better utilize “smart money” — when a musician doesn’t have much money to spend and therefore must use their funds as efficiently as possible.

“In music and Web3, I’m noticing instead of just random artists dropping NFT projects that happen to gain a lot of money, there’s more focus on ‘what’s the actual use case?’” Hu told Cointelegraph. “What is blockchain actually adding to music in a way that makes things easier and not harder from a technical standpoint?”

URL meets IRL

One thing that stood out at the Wavelengths Summit was how many online friends were meeting IRL — in real life — for the first time. Having many internet friends is not unique to crypto, but it is particularly pronounced in the space, given its inherently decentralized nature. For most people, meeting an online friend in person is special, and the summit was designed to facilitate those connections.

The internet allows for a level of community building previously impossible, especially between musicians and their fans. But as Gremore told Cointelegraph, “There’s a magic in IRL that just can’t be replaced.” She added, “URL is where so many of the conversations start happening, and then IRL — it’s a chance to deepen those bonds.”

Summit attendees connect and network during the “Web3 Happy Hour.” Source: Jonathan DeYoung

For Hu, building in-person relationships is critical for the long-term success of Web3 communities. “IRL events make or break trust in a community,” she said. When internet-based communities meet in person, that community’s carefully curated online image disappears, and people see it for what it really is — whether good or bad.

“Events are so important for online communities because if the name of the game is long-term sustainability, that will make or break trust. If it succeeds, it could be a huge kickstarter to a whole new stage or a whole new level for the community or for the brand. But I’ve definitely seen it go the other way around also.”

For those unable to participate in IRL experiences, online ones still offer opportunities, such as allowing fans to connect virtually with their favorite music artists. “I think using virtual things, not necessarily the metaverse but using live-streaming platforms, things like that — I think you can simulate the same thing,” McClain said. “Everybody can participate no matter where they are.”

“I think online spaces are safe havens for a lot of people, and I think that that should never be discounted,” believes Davies. “But I think the power of meeting somebody in person and being like, oh, you’re like a real human being, and we have similar thoughts about this, and maybe a block on a chain helped us find each other — but really what it’s about is us hanging out in person.”

Magazine: AI Eye: ‘Biggest ever’ leap in AI, cool new tools, AIs are the real DAOs

Ultimately, the main takeaway of the Wavelengths Summit was that community-building is a critical component for success in both music and Web3, and Water & Music intentionally designed its inaugural summit to set an example of how it believes community-building should look.

To close out the day, Gremore shared with the audience that Water & Music wanted attendees to leave empowered — that even though it may seem like the music industry is broken, there is still light at the end of the tunnel. And as the summit revealed, some of that hope may come in the form of DAOs, NFTs or other blockchain-based tools that help artists build community directly with their fans. Or, as Gremore told the audience:

“We’re fucked — but maybe we can do something about it.”

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Artists face a choice with AI: Adapt or become obsolete

Art generated by artificial intelligence is making waves because of its ramifications — for originality, authorship, and authenticity.

The artificial intelligence art gold rush began around 2018 when Christie’s auctioned “Portrait of Edmond Belamy” for an astounding $432,500. Since then, it has been an up-only journey for AI-generated images.

“Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” Jason Allen’s AI artwork, even won a prize at the Colorado State Fair art competition. This shows how AI-generated images have not only become more popular but also very sophisticated recently. But not everyone is happy about this development, and their concerns are valid.

The evolution of AI art has sparked feisty debates around originality, authorship and authenticity — themes fundamental to artistic expression. Generative AI, like any other technology, is intent-neutral. Whether the outcome is good or bad depends on how we use it.

So, it’s crucial to understand how and to what extent AI influences artistic communities and their creations.

The fears: Replacement, mimicry and homogenization

Some people fear that artificial intelligence will make artists obsolete — just like digital printing technology replaced analog typesetters, block makers, etc. This view, however, represents a limited, narrow perspective. Only the hopelessly conservative critic can peddle such short-sighted notions.

That’s not to say every traditional process involved in artistic creation will remain intact post-AI. Some of the menial and repetitive tasks will fade away. Yet, there’s little or no threat to creativity and ideation, the core humane aspects of art.

Related: Elizabeth Warren is pushing the Senate to ban your crypto wallet

Nevertheless, AI-generated images do present some ethical problems, such as copyright violations. They stem from the methods companies use to train text-to-art models and general adversarial networks. Consequently, some artists recently sued Midjourney, Stability AI and DeviantArt for using their artworks in AI training without permission or compensation.

Abandoning such practices is necessary to ensure the long-term adoption of and trust in AI art. They raise concerns about mimicry and homogenization, especially as text-to-image tools become more popular and accessible. And ultimately, this defeats the purpose of enhancing artistic creativity using AI.

Regardless of how artists and creators feel about AI-generated art, generative art tools have cemented their spot in the art ecosystem. Artist communities can now either adapt or complain. Many artists have smartly resorted to the former. 

AI-generated artwork. Source: BlueWillow

Recognize AI art as a distinct form

Boris Eldagsen, a German artist and photographer, refused to accept the prize he won at the 2023 Sony World Photography Awards. He “applied as a cheeky monkey” and submitted an AI-generated image for the creative open category.

Eldagsen wanted to make a point about whether we should consider AI-based imagery photography. He thinks AI-generated images and photographs are different entities, and can’t compete in the same category. The same argument can apply to AI art in general.

Like painting, sculpting, sketching, etc., AI art is a category in itself. We must approach it that way. It’s not a question of regulating how artists use AI or if they can participate in competitions, nor is it about purely philosophical considerations seeking the essence of art. Instead, it’s necessary to recognize AI art as a distinct form, setting the parameters for judgment accordingly.

Having said that, adding identifying marks to distinguish AI-generated images from photography or other kinds of digital imagery may prove helpful — particularly in the early days, to curb misunderstandings and the potential spread of misinformation.

The segregation works both ways, though, and can stop people from confusing digital illustrations as AI-generated artwork. This helps avoid situations where creators get banned from channels with “no AI art” policies, like how digitalAI artist Ben Moran was banned from Reddit’s r/Art subreddit.

AI-generated artwork. Source: BlueWillow

Toward human-machine collaboration in art

The World Photography Organization said they awarded Eldagsen at the 2023 Sony World Photography Awards because the AI-generated work relied heavily upon the artist’s “wealth of photographic knowledge.” Moreover, the competition’s creative open category “welcomes various experimental approaches to image making from cyanotypes and rayographs to cutting-edge digital practices.

This points to the fact that AI can enhance, not necessarily hamper, artistic creation. So, here’s the most critical aspect of AI’s influence on art and artistic communities: It widens their horizon significantly, unlocking new possibilities and ways to express ideas.

Related: The world could be facing a dark future thanks to CBDCs

Accessible generative AI tools — such as Midjourney, Dall-E and my own BlueWillow — also foster artistic inclusion. They allow anyone with a creative mind to make high-quality digital artwork. Imagine a physically challenged person or someone unable to afford art supplies exploring their artistic capabilities with these tools. This wouldn’t perhaps be possible earlier, at least not easily.

AI-generated images also help professional artists work faster and more efficiently. The impact is similar to using assistive tools like Photoshop or Illustrator, but much greater. While working on a commissioned project, for example, they can easily create multiple mockups using text-to-image tools. This saves loads of time and effort, letting creatives focus on creativity and innovation.

AI-generated artwork. Source: BlueWillow

Leverage technology — don’t fight it

Technological progress is inevitable. It’s also desirable if done right, while misplaced opposition is both naive and destructive. We are currently at this juncture when it comes to AI art.

Portrait artists decried the rise of photography. They were afraid. But today, we can only be thankful for the wonders that innovations in photography — both technology and content — have helped us achieve. Something similar will happen as we leverage AI for art.

AI’s disruptive influence is already visible to progressive artistic communities worldwide. Coupled with other emerging technologies like nonfungible tokens (NFTs), it’s enabling them to produce work with previously unimaginable variations, scale and speed. And we are thus witnessing the unfolding of our artistic future — one that’s diverse, community-oriented and technologically supreme.

Hector Ferran is the vice president of marketing at BlueWillow AI, an image-generating AI company.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin

Sotheby’s auction house launches on-chain secondary NFT marketplace

The luxury auction house has developed a fully on-chain sales system where users can purchase curated NFTs on the Ethereum and Polygon networks.

Luxury auction house Sotheby’s has announced the addition of a new on-chain marketplace that allows digital art collectors to purchase secondary NFTs.

While many pre-existing NFT marketplaces already host peer-to-peer sales of digital artworks — the auction house is attempting to separate itself by offering a “rotating, curated selection of leading artists hand-picked by Sotheby’s specialists.”

All NFT sales on the Sotheby's Metaverse platform occur by way of smart contracts that allow digital art collectors to pay for their art and collectibles in a choice of Ether (ETH) or Polygon (MATIC).

Sotheby’s also noted it will honor artist royalties through smart contracts on the secondary sales platform and will automatically pay artists according to the royalty rate they choose to select.

According to a Sotheby’s May 1 announcement on Twitter, the platform will launch featuring works from 13 prominent digital artists, including the pseudonymous artist XCOPY, Claire Silver, Tyler Hobbs and Hackatao.

"Casco Viejo" generative artwork by IX Shells. Source: Sotheby's.

The 279-year-old British-American clearing house made its first appearance on the NFT scene in April 2021, when it auctioned off the work of a pseudonymous digital artist known as Pak. Since then the art house has conducted a number of record-breaking digital art sales.

Related: Snow Crash manuscript that coined the term ‘metaverse’ to be auctioned by Sotheby’s

On June 11, 2021, Sotheby’s sold a rare CryptoPunk known as “Covid Alien” for a staggering $11.8 million.

Just three months later on Sept. 10, Sotheby’s facilitated an action of 101 Bored Ape NFTs that cleared a total of $24 million.

In November 2021 Sotheby’s conducted the largest NFT charity auction in history, auctioning off 140 rare NFTs to raise funds for the nonprofit healthcare organization Sostento.

Magazine: 4 out of 10 NFT sales are fake: Learn to spot the signs of wash trading

MicroStrategy completes $3 billion convertible notes offering to buy more Bitcoin