1. Home
  2. Bridge

Bridge

Multichain MPC bridge sees $100M+ outflows, sparking fears of exploit

Some Multichain contracts on Ethereum suffered withdrawals of more than half of their deposits, causing on-chain sleuths to fear an exploit is underway.

Abnormally large outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform on July 6 have sparked fears that an exploit could be underway. Over $102 million worth of crypto has been withdrawn from Multichain’s Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side, as well as $666,000 from Dogechain and $5 million from Moonriver.

On July 6, 7,214 Wrapped Ether (WETH) tokens (worth $13.6 million), 1,024 Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) (worth $31 million) and $58 million worth of US Dollar Coin (USDC) were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge’s Ethereum smart contract, with a total of approximately $102 million in cryptocurrency withdrawn.

July 6 withdrawals from the Multichain Fantom Bridge contract on Ethereum. Source: Blockchain data

In addition, the Dogechain bridge’s Ethereum contract saw a withdrawal of $666,000, which represented more than 86% of its total deposits, leaving only around $100,000 worth of assets remaining in the bridge. $5,872,661 worth of USDC and Tether (USDT) were withdrawn from the Multichain Moonriver bridge contracts on Ethereum, leaving only around $700,000 remaining on it.

Several on-chain sleuths took to Twitter to label the event as a possible exploit. Blockchain security firm Peckshield tagged the Multichain team in a post showing the Fantom bridge transactions, saying “You may want to take a look.”

This led one commenter to remark that it looks like “another massive hack.” On-chain investigator Spreek posted the Dogechain transactions with the comment “dogechain multichain drained.”

Cointelegraph could not confirm by the time of publication whether the contracts were “drained” or whether a large amount of funds were simply withdrawn by users. 

Cointelegraph reached out to the Multichain team on their Discord channel, but did not get a response by the time of publication. Multichain's last post on Twitter was June 29.

Related: Poly Network urges users to withdraw after exploit affects 57 crypto assets

Multichain is a multi-party computation (MPC) bridging network. When a user wants to bridge assets from one chain to another, the Multichain network first confirms that the assets have been locked on the first chain and then mints derivative assets on the second chain.

When a withdrawal is made, the network goes through this process in reverse: it first confirms that the derivative coins have been destroyed on the second chain, then releases the assets backing them on the first chain.

The Multichain team claims that the cryptographic keys controlling this process are split into multiple shards and distributed throughout the network. This should theoretically prevent any single person or group from being able to make unauthorized withdrawals.

Multichain has been suffering from unspecified technical problems over the past few weeks. On May 31, the team announced that their CEO had gone missing and they were experiencing “multiple issues due to unforeseeable circumstances,” leading to delayed transactions. On July 5, Binance halted withdrawals of some Multichain derivative tokens due to the network failing to process transactions in a timely manner.

Asia Express: HK crypto ETFs on fire, Binance warns on Maverick FOMO, Poly hack

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

Blockchain developers launch $50M fund to increase Wormhole adoption

Wormhole is a cross-chain messaging protocol often used to transfer assets from one blockchain to another.

A $50 million fund has been launched to help startups that use the Wormhole cross-chain messaging protocol, according to a May 18 announcement. The new fund is being managed by venture capital fund Borderless Capital and is backed by over 20 other blockchain development teams and venture capital firms, including Circle, Polygon Ventures, Solana Foundation, JumpCrypto, and others.

The fund will help startups that are “innovating cutting-edge apps, infrastructure, or tools that span multiple ecosystems,” according to its application page on the Wormhole website, which also describes the fund as “anti-maxi” or promoting the idea that more than one blockchain is needed to solve users’ problems.

David Garcia, CEO & Managing Partner of Borderless Capital, stated that he thought the new fund would help to grow the Web3 economy and allow applications to attract new users:

“Our goal is to empower builders to transcend the limitations of individual ecosystems, paving the way for blockchain applications and protocols to realize their full potential."

Wormhole is a cross-chain messaging protocol. It allows different blockchain networks to communicate with each other and is often used to bridge assets from one network to another. For example, if a user wanted to transfer Ether (ETH) from the Ethereum network to the Solana network, they could do so using Wormhole. It is connected to over 20 different networks, the announcement said.

Other cross-chain messaging protocols include LayerZero, Celer, DeBridge, and many others.

Related: Uniswap debate between bridging protocols lays bare security concerns

Wormhole has expanded its network of partners in the past few months. In January, crypto exchange Uniswap chose it as the official bridging protocol for its cross-chain governance between Ethereum and BNB Network. And on April 26, Wormhole integrated with Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol to allow for simpler transfers of US Dollar Coin from Ethereum to Avalanche.

However, Wormhole has also met with controversy over its security in the past. Its Solana bridge was hacked in February, 2022, leading to $321 million in losses. Developers later patched the faulty code that had led to the exploit and reimbursed all users.

Magazine: Should crypto projects ever negotiate with hackers? Probably

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

Avalanche Sees Surge in BTC Bridged to Its Network With Over $44 Million in Bitcoin Ported on Thursday

Avalanche Sees Surge in BTC Bridged to Its Network With Over  Million in Bitcoin Ported on ThursdayAccording to statistics, the number of bitcoin bridged to the Avalanche blockchain saw a significant inflow on March 2, as more than 2,000 bitcoin were bridged on that day. Data further shows that as of Friday, March 3, a total of 8,504 bitcoin worth $190.9 million was bridged over to the Avalanche network. Bitcoin Bridged […]

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

BonqDAO protocol suffers $120M loss after oracle hack

An oracle hack allowed the exploiter to manipulate the price of the AllianceBlock token, leading to an estimated $120 million loss, according to Peckshield.

A small decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) has suffered a rather sizeable smart contract exploit, leading to an estimated $120 million being stolen from its protocol.

BonqDAO told its Twitter followers on Feb. 1 that its Bonq protocol was exposed to an oracle hack that allowed the exploiter to manipulate the price of the AllianceBlock (ALBT) token.

An independent analysis from blockchain security firm PeckShield has estimated the loss from the Bonq hack to be around $120 million, comprising $108 million from 98.65 million BEUR tokens and $11 million from 113.8 million wrapped-ALBT (wALBT) tokens.

While the exploit took effect over several transactions, the largest was $82.19 million at 6:32 pm UTC time on Feb. 1, according to multichain portfolio tracker DeBank.

Most of the high-scale transactions took place on the Polygon network.

How it happened

PeckShield explained that the exploiter was able to change the updatePrice function of the oracle in one of BonqDAO’s smart contracts, which meant that they were able to manipulate the price of the wALBT token.

This triggered the exploitation of the wALBT and BEUR. The hacker then swapped about $500,000 worth of BEUR for USDC on Uniswap before burning all 113.8 million wALBT to unlock ALBT.

On-chain security observer “Spreek” — who was one of the first to spot the exploit — told his 18,800 Twitter followers that the exploiter later dumped more BEUR and ALBT tokens for $500,000 in USDC and 144 ETH ($236,000).

PeckShield and others noted that the price of the BEUR and ALBT tokens went down considerably in a short period of time:

In a follow up tweet, BonqDAO said it has paused the protocol and is working on a recovery solution.

“Other troves remain unaffected. Bonq protocol has been paused. We’re working on a solution that will allow users to withdraw all remaining collateral without repaying BEUR in the troves. It will be released tomorrow morning CET,” it said.

AllianceBlock — the token issuers of ALBT — also shared the news on Feb. 1, explaining to its 51,300 Twitter followers that an exploiter managed to gain access to 113.8 million ALBT tokens.

The team is in the process of removing all liquidity on Bonq and has halted exchange trading, it said, adding that no smart contracts were exploited on AllianceBlock.

The announcement from AllianceBlock also added that they would mint new ALBT tokens to those impacted by the exploit up until the time of the announcement.

Related: Tribe DAO votes in favor of repaying victims of $80M Rari hack

BonqDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization that aims to provide self-sovereign financial services to individuals and businesses interest-free without giving up ownership of their assets.

AllianceBlock is a decentralized infrastructure platform that connects traditional financial institutions to Web3 applications.

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

Ripple and Peersyst Devs Push XRP Toward Ethereum Compatibility With First Phase of an EVM Sidechain

Ripple and Peersyst Devs Push XRP Toward Ethereum Compatibility With First Phase of an EVM SidechainAccording to an announcement from Ripple’s core development team Ripplex, developers have introduced the first step toward Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility with the XRP-based sidechain XRPL. The XRPL is now live on Devnet and developers can “assess available technologies,” alongside deploying “existing Solidity apps on the EVM sidechain.” Ripple Core Developers and Peersyst Reveal […]

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

Cross-Chain Bridge Nomad Loses $190 Million Making It 2022’s Third-Largest Crypto Heist

Cross-Chain Bridge Nomad Loses 0 Million Making It 2022’s Third-Largest Crypto HeistOn Monday, the cross-chain token bridge Nomad was attacked and hackers managed to siphon $190 million from the protocol, draining a great majority of the funds. The Nomad cross-chain bridge attack was the third-biggest crypto heist of 2022, and the ninth largest of all time. Nomad Cross-Chain Bridge Exploited for $190 Million Cross-chain bridges in […]

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

Terra Collapse Continues to Plague Defi — Value Locked in Cross-Chain Bridges Down 20% This Month

Terra Collapse Continues to Plague Defi — Value Locked in Cross-Chain Bridges Down 20% This MonthFollowing the aftermath of the Terra blockchain fiasco, decentralized finance (defi) continues to feel the impact of the project’s fallout. During the last four days the total value locked (TVL) in defi has dropped 2.61% in value, and cross-chain bridges have lost roughly 20.3% during the last 30 days. Value Locked in Cross Chain Bridge […]

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services

How to bridge tokens from other chains to the Polygon Network

To do anything on Polygon, you'll need MATIC, which isn't always easy to come by from other networks' DEXes.

Bridging assets could help solve issues like scalability, speed and high fees. Bridging means users can move their tokens between blockchain networks quickly and cost-effectively.

The Polygon Bridge is used for cross-chain transactions between the Polygon (MATIC) and Ethereum (ETH) blockchains. It allows users to transfer ERC tokens and NFTs to the Polygon sidechain through smart contracts.

This guide will show you how to bridge Polygon with other blockchains. However, given that Ethereum is the platform most often used for decentralized finance (DeFi), nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and the metaverse, we’ll be looking at how to bridge tokens from the Ethereum network to Polygon, an increasingly popular platform due to its efficient interoperability.

How to use the Polygon bridge?

The Polygon bridge is designed to connect different blockchains with fast and cheap transactions so that users can easily transfer tokens back and forth. It also enhances the Ethereum ecosystem through efficient tools that help build scalable decentralized applications (DApps).

The Polygon Bridge allows users to move tokens from Ethereum ERC20 to Polygon Matic, Polygon’s native token, which is the cheapest way to bridge ETH to Polygon.

Related: Polygon blockchain explained: A beginner's guide to MATIC

Here’s how to bridge assets to Polygon

There are two Polygon bridges: the proof-of-stake (PoS) Bridge, which is the official Matic Bridge, and the Plasma Bridge.

Both bridges can be used to transfer tokens from Ethereum to Polygon and vice versa, but they are different in their approach to security methods.

The PoS Bridge is the most popular and straightforward for transferring ETH and most ERC tokens. It uses the PoS consensus algorithm to secure its network.

Deposits on the PoS Bridge are instantly secured, but withdrawals may take a while to confirm. A PoS Bridge withdrawal usually takes between 45 minutes and 3 hours, while the Plasma Bridge can take as long as seven days.

The Plasma Bridge is more suitable for developers that require higher security. It uses the Ethereum Plasma scaling solution and supports the transfer of MATIC, ETH, ERC-20 and ERC-721 tokens.

Related: Proof-of-stake vs. proof-of-work: Differences explained

How to use the Matic Bridge to bridge tokens

To bridge tokens from Ethereum to Polygon, the first requirement is access to a compatible cryptocurrency wallet, such as MetaMask, but other options can also be used, as shown below.

1. Log in to the Polygon Web Wallet by clicking on the Polygon Bridge.

2. Next, you need to connect your Ethereum wallet. In this example, Metamask is used, but other options, as mentioned in the image below, can also be employed.

3. A digital signature is required to connect your MetaMask wallet to your Polygon wallet. Ensure the URL is correct before clicking on sign in to proceed to avoid any scamming attempt.

4. To send your tokens from Ethereum to Polygon, go to the deposit tab and click on the required token you want to bridge. Enter the amount and click transfer. Read the notes on the following page and click continue. You will then be directed to agree to the estimated gas fees and click continue.

5. You can review your transaction details, such as the token amount and the estimated transaction fee, on the following page before completing the operation. Then click continue to sign and approve the transfer.

6. Once confirmed, you can check the transaction status on Etherscan.

You can also use Polygon Bridge Matic to run the inverse transaction to transfer MATIC to Ethereum. Similarly, you'll need a compatible crypto wallet such as MetaMask.

To transfer tokens from Polygon to Ethereum blockchain via the PoS Bridge, follow the following steps:

You can view the status of the transaction on Etherscan. It might take up to three hours for the transaction to be verified by PoS validators and completed. Once validated, you will need to claim the tokens to the MetaMask wallet. Click continue to allow the withdrawal to complete.

How to use the Plasma bridge on Polygon

The Plasma Bridge can help you transfer MATIC or other Polygon tokens to Ethereum. However, it only supports the transfer of ERC-20 and ERC-721 tokens, including ETH and MATIC. It uses the Ethereum Plasma scaling solution for higher security, which is why it’s the preferred tool by developers.

To transfer Matic, for instance, from Polygon to Ethereum, any Ethereum wallet such as Metamask can be used. You need to add the Polygon network to your wallet before you can view your MATIC and start the process. It’s easy to add the Polygon network, just follow the instructions.

For example, on Metamask, make sure that you're connected to your MetaMask wallet. Then click the Switch to Polygon button on the top.

A pop-up from your MetaMask extension with the Polygon network details will appear, then click approve.

To see Matic on your Metamask wallet, you need to switch your MetaMask from the Ethereum Mainnet to the Polygon network. Just click on the switch network.

To bridge MATIC to Ethereum using MetaMask, you can follow the following steps:

Please note that the process involved in Step 5 is more burdensome than the PoS Bridge as you need to confirm three transactions manually for a Plasma Bridge transfer. The first will initiate your withdrawal from the Polygon wallet, which could take up to three hours.

Ethereum gas fees have been a significant issue in the last couple of years since NFTs and DeFi have become popular due to network congestion. Layer-2 systems (L2s) are a secondary layer or protocol built on top of an existing blockchain system. Their main goal is to solve the transaction speed and scaling difficulties faced by the major cryptocurrency networks.

Polygon to Ethereum bridge fees can be reduced by using tools like QuickSwap.

QuickSwap is Polygon’s primary decentralized exchange (DEX) and functions as the core of the network.

Any ERC-20 token with liquidity can be traded on QuickSwap, and fees are naturally paid in MATIC, offering considerable savings.

Bybit Expands in CIS Region With Kazakhstan License for Crypto Services