1. Home
  2. Charity

Charity

DOGS token to donate $4.5M of unclaimed airdrops to charities

DOGS has also entered into a partnership with Best Friends Animal Society, a nonprofit dedicated to animal welfare in the US.

DOGS, a memecoin built on The Open Network (TON), plans to donate over 6 billion tokens worth about $4.5 million to nonprofit organizations worldwide following the launch of a charity portal in late November.

The new platform allows registered nonprofit organizations across the globe to apply for funding, “reflecting DOGS’ commitment to redirect a significant portion of unclaimed airdrop tokens toward charitable initiatives,” it told Cointelegraph.

“Over the course of the year, more than 6 billion DOGS tokens, equivalent to $4.5 million at the current rate, will be distributed to selected organizations, following a thorough approval process,” it added.

Read more

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Mercy Corps CIO explains how NGOs can integrate blockchain to amplify their efforts

Rapid and efficient humanitarian aid distribution is enhanced through the use of blockchain technology. Mercy Corps CIO Scott Onder explains how.

Over the past few years, saying “blockchain fixes this” has become a common trope. However, in the case of international aid distribution being enhanced by the integration of blockchain, the phrase has proven to be true. 

When a crisis occurs, reaction time is paramount, and according to Mercy Corps chief investment officer Scott Onder, using data analytics and blockchain to take action before disaster strikes is even more effective from a humanitarian impact and cost perspective.  

On Episode 47 of The Agenda podcast, hosts Ray Salmond and Jonathan DeYoung discuss how Mercy Corps — a global team of humanitarians focused on alleviating suffering, poverty and oppression — has embraced Web3 and blockchain to amplify its charitable efforts and aid distribution. 

Read more

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Vitalik Buterin denies selling Ether for profit

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin addresses allegations of profiting from ETH sales, emphasizing his long-term support for Web3 projects and charities.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin refuted allegations that he sold millions of dollars of Ether (ETH) for personal profit. He claimed to have sold his ETH holdings only to support various crypto projects and philanthropic initiatives.

On Aug. 30, a crypto community member on X accused Buterin of dumping over $2 million worth of Ether (800 ETH) after making a bullish tweet. Onchain analytics firm Lookonchain further suggested that the same wallet address received 3,000 ETH from the entrepreneur on Aug. 9. 

Source: Lookonchain

Read more

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

South Korea stops short of allowing crypto in updated donation laws

Department store gift vouchers, stocks, and loyalty points from tech giants can be donated to charities, but not crypto.

Digital currencies have been excluded from newly amended donation legislation in South Korea which could be a blow to the country's charities and donation drives. 

On May 5, local media outlet Kyunghyang Shinmun reported that the Ministry of Public Administration stated that some amendments to South Korea’s “Donations Act” have been filed but restrict the use of crypto assets for donation.

Starting in July, those wishing to donate to charitable organizations or causes will be able to use various new methods such as department store gift vouchers, stocks, and loyalty points from Korean internet giant Naver, but not crypto assets such as Bitcoin (BTC).

Read more

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Cryptocurrency charities can exploit the ‘gambler’s fallacy’ to reap larger donations — study

According to the researchers, people’s penchant to misinterpret patterns could be a boon for charitable organizations that accept cryptocurrency.

A team of academic researchers from the U.S. recently published a study exploring how the “gambler’s fallacy” affected cryptocurrency donations. Their findings indicate that organizations accepting crypto donations could benefit from timing the market. 

Essentially, the team’s work explores the idea that people generally misinterpret certain pattern signals when it comes to finance. Charities that understand the penchant for crypto holders to hold or move assets based on perceived market conditions may be able to optimize their strategies to reap larger donations.

Per the paper:

“Our findings support actionable recommendations for how charities can design more intentional fundraising campaigns to take advantage of the cost and time efficiencies of cryptocurrencies. By considering recent changes in cryptocurrency prices and highlighting the urgency to donate, charities can design more effective strategies to engage cryptocurrency donors.”

The team tested their premise through an empirical study of cryptocurrency donations to 117 campaigns at an online crowdfunding platform. They also conducted a controlled online experiment studying features of cryptocurrency donation context.

After careful analysis, the team determined that market movement was directly correlated to donation "activation" (first time donations) and donation sizes.

According to the paper, the online experiment expanded on the empirical analysis and demonstrated that “donors’ decisions are affected by recent changes in asset price, consistent with the gambler’s fallacy heuristic.”

The gambler’s fallacy, also commonly called the Monte Carlo fallacy, refers to the tendency for people to misinterpret statistically meaningless historical events, such as the flip of a coin, as a predictor for future odds.

As an example of the gambler’s fallacy, if a person flips a coin 10,000 times in a row, and it lands on heads each time, an observer might think that the next coinflip has a higher chance of landing on tails because, as the above video explains, “it’s due.”

In reality, the odds of a coin landing on heads or tails is always exactly one-in-two with no regard for historical outcomes.

During the study, the researchers determined that participants are more likely to be activated to donate after experiencing declines in asset value. This purportedly occurs because donors feel more confident that prices will go up after their donation due to the gambler’s fallacy. “Moreover,” the paper continues, “we observe that participants’ reliance on the gambler’s fallacy is amplified when they face urgent donation appeals.”

Ultimately, the paper concludes that these insights could be used as empirical evidence in the decision-making process for organizations and individuals managing charities that accept cryptocurrency donations.

Related: Blockchain in charity, explained

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Blockchain in charity, explained

Blockchain-based philanthropy involves transparent, efficient and secure transactions, ensuring accountable and impactful giving.

Challenges and considerations while using cryptocurrencies in humanitarian aid

Even if cryptocurrencies have the potential to revolutionize humanitarian aid efforts, it is imperative to address issues concerning volatility, inclusivity, cybersecurity, legal compliance and ethical considerations. 

The application of cryptocurrencies to humanitarian relief offers advantages and disadvantages. The value fluctuation of cryptocurrencies is one major obstacle. The ability of aid organizations to make effective plans and resource allocations might be impacted by price fluctuations. Careful financial techniques, such as instantaneous conversion to local currencies, are required to prevent losses resulting from market swings in order to alleviate this.

The digital divide in areas impacted by humanitarian crises is another issue. There are concerns regarding inclusion because not all beneficiaries may have access to the technology needed to use cryptocurrency. Aid groups need to think about other approaches and make sure that everyone may receive aid, regardless of their technological capacity.

The most important thing to consider while handling crypto transactions is cybersecurity. Cryptocurrencies’ decentralized and pseudonymous structure makes them vulnerable to hacking and scams by unscrupulous people. Strong security measures are essential to preserve money and keep beneficiaries and aid groups safe. Examples of such measures include encrypted wallets and secure transaction protocols.

Global legal systems and regulatory difficulties also vary. While some nations have welcomed cryptocurrencies, others have enacted stringent laws or outright banned them. Careful planning and adherence are necessary while navigating these varied legal environments to prevent legal issues and guarantee the legitimacy of aid activities. 

Although they provide protection and privacy, cryptocurrencies also raise issues related to accountability and transparency. It’s critical to strike a balance between donor privacy and the transparency required for relief agencies and donors to monitor fund utilization. One way to resolve this moral conundrum is to implement transparent blockchain platforms that permit public inspection while safeguarding private data.

Benefits of blockchain for charitable giving

Blockchain for charitable giving revolutionizes the sector by providing unprecedented transparency, efficiency and security. 

Every transaction related to charity is made publicly available and recorded thanks to the decentralized and unchangeable ledger powered by blockchain technology. By ensuring that donations are being used as intended, this transparency fosters trust and boosts confidence in nonprofit organizations.

Moreover, by streamlining the donation process, blockchains lower administrative expenses and guarantee that a larger percentage of donations go straight to the intended recipients. By automating transactions when predetermined criteria are satisfied, smart contracts — self-executing instructions on the blockchain — eliminate intermediaries and speed up the movement of funds. 

Additionally, by enabling quick and affordable international transactions, blockchain permits gifts to be made without borders. The reach of charity endeavors is expanded by this accessibility, which enables organizations to connect with a worldwide pool of prospective donors.

Furthermore, interactive awareness campaigns may utilize a series of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) that could educate people while raising funds by telling a story about the cause. Additionally, organizing challenges or competitions where participants create and submit NFTs relevant to the cause can raise donations through the sale of the winning NFTs.

Blockchain technology also improves data integrity and security. Blockchain’s cryptographic structure guarantees that once information is recorded, it cannot be changed without the consent of network members. The integrity of the entire nonprofit ecosystem is ensured by this immutability, which protects gift records and deters fraud. Because blockchain offers more transparency and lowers the risk of fraud, it not only draws in more contributions but also promotes consistent and long-term involvement with philanthropic projects.

Understanding blockchain-based philanthropy

By utilizing blockchain technology, blockchain-based philanthropy, commonly referred to as crypto philanthropy, transforms charitable giving. 

Blockchain-powered charity basically entails leveraging cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms to carry out charity activities and make donations. Blockchain-based philanthropy, in contrast to conventional methods, ensures unrivaled transparency and security. Every donation and its distribution are made public via the decentralized ledger of blockchain technology, offering transparent and unchangeable records.

Donors are able to track their contributions, which promotes trust and accountability. Donation processes can be automated with smart contracts and self-executing blockchain scripts that guarantee donations reach their intended recipients and cut down on administrative expenses. 

The borderless transfers made possible by cryptocurrencies allow for quick and inexpensive international donations. Crypto fundraising for charities is a paradigm shift that is promoting a new era of accessibility, efficiency and transparency.

Cryptocurrency-based charity platforms include Binance Charity and The Giving Block, amongst others. Binance Charity is the charitable division of the cryptocurrency exchange Binance, which has been actively involved in a number of charitable endeavors. It concentrates on leveraging blockchain technology to provide accountable, effective and transparent philanthropy.

The Giving Block facilitates the acceptance of cryptocurrency payments by charity organizations. Even though it may not be a platform for charitable giving itself, it helps many nonprofits receive cryptocurrency donations, making cryptocurrencies more widely available for philanthropic giving.

Challenges in traditional charity systems and the need for blockchain-based fundraising

The drawbacks of conventional charity systems, including limited visibility, high transaction fees and slow transaction processing, can be addressed by technologies like blockchain, which offer transparency, lower transaction costs and quick fund transfers.

There are various challenges that traditional charity systems must overcome to function effectively. The lack of transparency in the distribution and use of funds is one of the main problems. There is often limited visibility for donors regarding the use of their contributions, raising questions about possible mismanagement or inefficiencies. This could discourage prospective contributors from making a contribution, which would reduce the total amount of money available for charity endeavors.

Also, donations have less impact when financial intermediaries charge high transaction fees. These fees, which are typical of old systems, reduce the total amount that is available for charitable initiatives, thereby reducing their efficacy.

Moreover, delivery of vital help is delayed by slow transaction times, particularly with foreign donations. These delays can hinder emergency response operations and negatively impact the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations.

In response to these challenges, innovative solutions like blockchain-based fundraising platforms have emerged. By using a decentralized ledger to maintain transparency, they enable contributors to monitor their contributions in real time. Furthermore, blockchain transactions are cheaper and faster, making it possible for charitable organizations to move money quickly and affordably, enabling them to deploy funds effectively and on time.

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Blockchain improves charity transparency — But is it right for everyone?

Can blockchain technology actually help to improve transparency within charities?

In 2021, the Australian branch of the Red Cross received $90 million to aid the victims of the bushfires that plagued various regions of New South Wales and Victoria. 

However, the organization soon came under fire for its lack of transparency when it revealed that it would only distribute around one-third of the intended funds on immediate assistance and that it could take up to three years to distribute the total amount.

One resident who lost his home to the fires told local media, “They made a lot of promises that they’re going to this, that and other, (but) I’ve received nothing, I have no idea where the money is going.”

This one example highlights a common problem among charities: The processes for distributing charitable giving are often obscured by bureaucracy and prone to mismanagement. Without robust accountability mechanisms, charities risk mismanaging or misusing funds and, at worst, committing outright fraud.

Jack Vinijtrongjit, CEO of AAG — a venture capital firm that heads the AAG Charity DAO — told Cointelegraph, “Statistically, a lot of money goes to waste when it comes to charity. For example, in some cases, only fifty cents out of a dollar ends up at the destination. Very few can achieve efficiency in the 83% range, like Oxfam.”

Blockchain technology can provide tangible benefits for both donors and charities. It offers greater accountability and transparency for contributors, enabling them to follow their donations and see the results of their generosity.

How blockchain can provide transparency

Blockchain technology provides real-time tracking of donations and transactions. This level of transparency helps to build trust and confidence among donors, as they can verify that their funds are being used for the intended purpose.

In addition, it allows charities to provide donors with a detailed breakdown of their contributions, showing how each dollar is allocated to various projects or initiatives. Vinijtrongjit said, “With blockchain, the fund flow can be seen easily, and if the organization expects people to keep donating, they need to make sure as many funds as possible are delivered as intended.”

How blockchain can help provide more transparency. Source: OpenLedger

He said this transparency can reduce fraud and misuse of funds, as “there can be cases where corrupt local officials would take the funds and misuse them.”

Blockchain technology also has the important property of being immutable. A blockchain record or transaction cannot be changed or removed without the agreement of all nodes in the network. Because of its immutability, the charity’s financial records, donation histories and other data are safe from alteration.

Recent: Central banks want to look under crypto’s hood — Is this a positive sign?

This function is especially important for nonprofit organizations since it guarantees that any donations made to their cause will be permanently documented and easily audited by third parties.

Smart contracts, self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code, are another valuable aspect of blockchain technology for charities. These contracts can be used to automate processes such as distributing funds or verifying the completion of specific tasks.

Smart contracts help ensure that funds are used for their designated purposes, as they only release funds when predefined conditions are met. This enhances transparency by eliminating the need for intermediaries and reducing the risk of misusing funds.

Charities using blockchain technology

One notable example of a charity using blockchain technology is the United Nations World Food Programme’s (WFP) Building Blocks project. WFP deployed blockchain when providing food assistance to Syrian refugees in Jordan.

Each transaction, from food purchases to distribution, was recorded on a blockchain, allowing refugees to access their entitlements via a biometrically verified account.

The World Food Programme also extended its use of blockchain to Yemen, where it employed the technology to provide food assistance to vulnerable populations amid the ongoing Yemeni civil war. By providing digital vouchers through blockchain, the WFP could ensure that aid reached those in need while minimizing the risk of diversion or fraud.

In 2022, Binance launched the Ukraine Emergency Relief Fund, a cryptocurrency-focused crowdfunding platform that allowed people to make contributions to emergency relief efforts aimed at assisting refugees and children in need. This initiative also aims to provide crucial logistical support — including food, fuel and essential supplies — for refugees on the ground. Additionally, Binance donated 16,042 BNB (BNB), equal to $6 million at the time, to the fund.

Donations can be tracked via the official fundraising page, which shows a list of donors, the amount donated by each donor, the total amount raised, and allocations. For example, 2.5 million Binance USD (BUSD) (worth $2.5 million) was allocated to UNICEF and Mercy Corps each, out of the $11.3 million raised so far.

Allocation records of dispersed funds. Source: Binance Charity

Smaller charities such as GiveDirectly have also adopted blockchain technology. GiveDirectly, which recently provided direct cash transfers to survivors of the earthquake in Morocco and children living in poverty in Flint, Michigan, uses blockchain to record and verify every transaction.

Key considerations for charities

For charities looking to incorporate blockchain technology, there are several best practices to follow. First, it is imperative to establish clear objectives when integrating blockchain into charitable operations.

These objectives should be well-defined, including enhancing transparency, streamlining administrative processes or optimizing aid distribution.

Selecting the most suitable blockchain platform is of paramount importance. Choices like Ethereum or Hyperledger should be made judiciously, considering factors such as scalability, security and the unique requirements of the charitable organization.

Marina Zibareva, a spokesperson for Binance Charity — a nonprofit organization that uses blockchain technology for crypto donations — told Cointelegraph, “Charities need to adhere to some critical best practices when adopting blockchain technology to improve transparency in charitable operations. Among these is gaining a comprehensive understanding of how blockchain and cryptocurrency function. Acquiring this foundational knowledge is a pivotal first step in the integration process.”

Understanding how blockchain technology works is important for charities since blockchain technology isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. There are different implementations and platforms, each with unique features. For instance, layer-2 networks like Polygon have faster speeds and lower transaction costs. To select the most suitable solution, charities must understand these differences and how they align with their specific goals and donor preferences.

Jerry Lopez, founder and CEO of Philcoin — a blockchain-based philanthropy platform — told Cointelegraph:

“It is important for the organization to conduct an internal analysis to assess capabilities and resources. Is the organization ready for innovation and/or adaptation? Are the main stakeholders ready for the shift?”

“This sounds like an obvious point, but it’s essential. Charitable organizations can be slower to accept change. Understanding what’s necessary to make the leap to blockchain solutions will require additional resources and investments to ensure credible, trusted and functioning solutions are implemented,” he said.

Lopez also stressed the importance of the organization knowing if it’s “fully committed to seeing through the transition,” which can take time, research, understanding and a dedicated team to help manage and oversee the development. “Very often, organizations will learn through trial and error,” Lopez said.

Good security practices and maintaining data accuracy are fundamental principles to building and maintaining trust with both donors and beneficiaries. This involves the continuous upkeep of precise, up-to-date records on the blockchain. Regular audits and verification of transactions are essential measures to prevent errors or fraudulent activities.

Zibareva said, “Charities must prioritize security as they venture into the blockchain realm. Adopting cutting-edge security measures and technologies is vital to safeguard the system’s integrity. Putting safety at the forefront ensures the protection of the organization and its donors from potential fraud and bolsters the overall trust in the transparency mechanisms in place.”

Adhering to data protection regulations and preserving the privacy of sensitive beneficiary information are nonnegotiable elements. These data security considerations should be balanced with the necessity of allowing accessibility for verification purposes.

Planning for scalability is another critical aspect, particularly when anticipating a growing volume of transactions and beneficiaries over time. The long-term sustainability of the blockchain infrastructure should be a central concern, ensuring that it can adapt to the evolving needs of the charitable organization.

Zibareva added that charities “should evaluate their technical readiness, considering their capacity to manage cryptocurrency wallets and other blockchain-related infrastructures.”

“By comparing their operational needs with blockchain’s capabilities and leveraging expert insights, charitable organizations can decide whether blockchain integration aligns with their transparency goals.”

It’s also necessary for charities to assess whether their community (donors, partners, etc.) are ready to accept using blockchain platforms for charitable purposes. 

Lopez said, “Is the community ready to accept blockchain? How will blockchain solutions impact the supplier chain, for example? Is the community able to accept, receive or interact with the new solutions, or will this require additional infrastructure, education, training and development to ensure the full charitable cycle is onboarded?”

The adoption of blockchain technology in the charitable sector is a complex process that goes beyond just the technology itself. It involves organizational preparedness, supplier relationships and the broader community’s ability to adapt. Transparency in charities is a noble goal, but it requires a comprehensive and well-planned approach to ensure that the full potential of blockchain is realized without leaving any stakeholders behind.

What else can charities do to increase transparency?

While blockchain technology can indeed help track the flow of funds, it can be combined with additional organizational processes to ensure that charitable donations are used effectively. 

Vinijtrongjit said, “I don’t believe blockchain alone can help fix these issues since tracking the use of funds is much more complex. For example, local charities at the destination may be forced to use a vendor overcharging them as part of the corruption scheme. An independent audit must still be carried out, but at least blockchain can be used to ensure the fund gets to the destination.”

Magazine: Ethereum restaking: Blockchain innovation or dangerous house of cards?

Independent audits are another important aspect of ensuring transparency, as they can thoroughly examine a charity’s financial records, operations and compliance with regulations. They provide an objective evaluation of the organization’s financial health and adherence to best practices.

Vinijtrongjit also believes that organizations must fully adopt blockchain in every part of their operations, as charities providing comprehensive, accessible and regular reports that detail their activities and financial information can be beneficial.

This includes information such as the allocation of funds and the amount of money raised, which can be gathered from the blockchain and added to these reports. Vinijtrongjit said:

“This will be like providing insights to the potential donors so they can decide not just what cause to contribute to but also based on how well the organization can carry out the mission.” 

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Crypto donations fund fire relief efforts on Maui

The Giving Block matched more than $68,000 in crypto and fiat donations to raise more than $136,000 for a project aimed at assisting efforts following the fires in Maui.

Relief efforts are still underway on the Hawaiian island of Maui following a series of wildfires severely damaging major areas including Lahaina.

All Hands and Hearts, a disaster relief organization, has been collecting cryptocurrency and fiat donations to assist local Maui residents in the wake of the fires which took the lives of more than 100 people and destroyed homes and businesses. Government officials have reported the cost to rebuild may be more than $5.5 billion.

“Cryptocurrency donations as any other type of donations are helping to provide essential support after the devastating wildfires,” said Olga Ruggiero, the chief of organizational integration and events at All Hands and Hearts. “The crypto industry continues to band together with communities around the world in need.”

Ruggiero reported that the organization had received more than $125 million in crypto through The Giving Block, a charity platform which facilitates digital asset donations in Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and other tokens. At the time of publication, the Giving Block had matched more than $68,000 in crypto and fiat donations to raise more than $136,000 for the Maui project.

“All Hands and Hearts and other disaster relief organizations have evolved their donation strategies over the years by embracing technology and utilizing different types of digital platforms,” said Ruggiero. “These changes have improved fundraising efficiency and effectiveness, enabling organizations to provide crucial aid during disasters.”

Related: Ukrainian Children of Heroes need your help: Donate with crypto

The fires, which reports suggest may have been caused by downed power lines on Aug. 8, have devastated the island of more than 160,000 residents. In addition to donations through All Hands and Hearts, the governments of Japan and South Korea each pledged $2 million in aid to support relief efforts.

Many organizations have turned to cryptocurrency as a solution to get funds into areas affected by natural and man-made disasters. In Ukraine, where residents have faced Russian military attacks since 2022, the government received more than $70 million in crypto for military equipment and humanitarian assistance as of February.

Magazine: 6 Questions for Alex Wilson of The Giving Block

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Tragedy or rug pull? Inside the collapse of a ‘charitable’ NFT project

Orica NFT’s charity efforts have succeeded, but its tokenholders have not, and up until now, its co-founder was nowhere to be found.

Launched in November 2021, nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace Orica held itself up as an “ethical platform” benefitting artists, collectors and charities alike. At the time, the organization was involved in prominent projects — from building a school in Uganda to aiding victims of human trafficking to helping Ukraine

But less than two years later, the project’s founders have disappeared, and the marketplace’s user interface has gone offline. All that remains are the project’s charity efforts, which proved to be genuine, in tandem with allegations from disgruntled users that the developers orchestrated a rug pull. In a new revelation, co-founder Danial Zey breaks his yearlong silence, not only denying all allegations and insisting the project was “hacked” but also claiming that the project is still ongoing. Cointelegraph investigates. 

An ICO amid the bear market

According to initial coin offering (ICO) information site CryptoTotem, Orica ran a fundraiser from Aug. 14 to Sept. 14, 2021. It aimed to raise $3.1 million from the sale of its Orica (ORI) token. In its ICO, Orica promised to earmark 50% of the total supply of ORI for “NFT marketplace rewards.” Another 10% was supposed to be supplied to “advisors and partners,” 15% given to the team and 25% sold to investors. At launch, Aug. 21, 2021, the price of ORI rose to a peak of $3.638 per coin, then fell to $0.036 by Oct. 1, 2022, based on data from Live Coin Watch. 

The token no longer has tangible value at the time of publication, and its communication channels appear to have gone cold. A former user, who wished to remain anonymous, told Cointelegraph that the “[NFT] marketplace kind of dried out with not enough people using it and then very quickly everything went kind of offline including their website."

ORI price chart. Source: Live Coin Watch

The philanthropy that survived 

In late 2021, the firm partnered with Austrian charity project Bbanga to help build a school for children in the Ssese Islands in Uganda. Bbanga commissioned German digital artist Mellowmann to release Uganda-inspired digital art pieces as NFTs, which were then to be sold via Orica’s marketplace. The sale surpassed the $6,500 goal needed to construct the school.

Mellowmann and Bbanga NFT sold at the Orica auction. Source: Orica

A former Orica staff member, who wished to remain anonymous, told Cointelegraph that “the Uganda school received full payment as this was overseen by Sani, Founder of the Bbanga Project, who was working with Orica at the time." The project released a video this June showcasing that some of the school's buildings had already been built, including a main hall and library.

The Orica and Bbanga school in Uganda. Source: Bbanga

On Dec. 21, 2021, charity group Hope for the Future also announced that it would be selling NFTs on Orica to fund its efforts. Hope for the Future is another Austrian-based nonprofit that helps victims of human trafficking reintegrate into society after they are rescued from captivity. The charity continues to operate today. Its efforts to help Ukrainian artists also materialized in the REFUGE campaign that ran in March 2022. 

An embroidery NFT "Obra" previously held for sale on Orica. Source: Aline Brant

When prompted on the matter, the former Orica staff member said, “All artists were paid in full." An amount close to $30,000 was raised in conjunction with Orica’s efforts to help Ukraine and was processed by crypto donations processor The Giving Block. In one of the last statements before going cold, Zey wrote: “We donated 10% of the amount we ever made. Our main product is tech that is built to give to people."

And the project that didn't ...

Despite official claims as to why the project went down, blockchain data and user complaints suggest irregularities. 

On May 11, 2022, the Polygon version of Orica was deployed as part of its migration from BNB Smart Chain. This version had a total supply of just 84 million tokens, 16 million less than the original Orica token on BNB Chain. The Polygon version of ORI was a “liquidity generator” token with built-in liquidity provider and swap functions. It had the ability to call contracts on the decentralized exchange QuickSwap, which is a fork of Uniswap v2 on Polygon. 

On June 4, 2022, an Orica Discord server admin who goes by the name “Plem” told users the migration was complete. According to Plem, users had received tokens on the new chain equal to the ones they held on the previous chain.

Orica announcing the Polygon migration. Source: Discord

Some users complained that they had not received their tokens. In response, the admin told them to add the new token contract in MetaMask. If they did this and still did not see their tokens, they were asked to submit a support ticket. 

But the deployer on Polygon did not directly send tokens to users who held ORI on BNB. Instead, it transferred ownership to a separate account, which proceeded to sell nearly the entire supply of the coin through market-making operations. Zey stated that this second account was not operated by him. Instead, he claimed that a “hacker” stole his deployer key and transferred it. The new owner proceeded to call various liquidity provider and swap functions over the next two months on QuickSwap.

Zey did not report this attack until Aug. 11, 2022, exactly one month after it had occurred. A member of the team had reported 24 days after the “attack” that the migration had been completed. The same day, the new owner transferred an unusually large amount of tokens — 23,187,983 — to address 0x14dd44e1d3f9a173998c53d75622127ce921ccee. After this transaction, the new owner continued to post liquidity provider transactions for ORI tokens until the new owner stopped on Sept. 11, 2022. In a similar Aug. 11, 2022 Telegram message, Zey claimed that his laptop had been hacked and that tokens had been “moved out directly from the deployer.”

On Aug. 12, 2022, Plem announced that the project would be “closing communications” due to a “hard situation that involves massive uncontrollable tokens deployment and selling process.”

Orica staff stating that they would cease communications. Source: Discord

In the final message, users were told to send direct messages to Zey if they had questions, referring to the team’s blockchain operations lead. Subsequent messages to the group indicate that Zey has blocked all messages.

Orica's last message before going dark on Discord. Source: Discord
Co-founder Danial Zey’s response to a user inquiry before new messages in the channel were archived. Source: Telegram

Related: Newly discovered Bitcoin wallet loophole let hackers steal $900K — SlowMist

On Sept. 11, 2022, the new owner made a final transfer of approximately 150 Polygon (MATIC), worth $133.10 at the time, to address 0xfE3fB1d3C9FBF50b6af3A60b5D070dF68D87b99e. This account had previously received 3,463 MATIC ($3,082 at the time) from the new owner. At the time of publication, 9.9 million ORI ($4,341 at today’s price) remains in the account that was transferred ownership after deployment. 

Co-founder’s new revelations

Speaking to Cointelegraph on Aug. 17, 2023, Zey denied the rug pull allegations, stating: 

“I think the situation is complex and it is not wise to give out info that we might need to win some of the funds back. About the part with rug pull. We had a team of more than 15 people and we paid them until the end salaries plus we paid for the liquidity , Certik audit and some parts of the development."

“Our tokens were locked," said Zey. “On the blockchain it is also provable that we had several severe attacks on us. We are a charity project but still got hacked," he stated while alleging that hacked funds were laundered through cryptocurrency mixer Tornado Cash, making it impossible to trace. “The few remaining people that worked without any salary like myself are still in this project working patiently behind the scenes but the comeback has to be strong so we can make up for the situation," Zey claims. 

Zey did not respond to a request for the hash ID of transactions linked to the alleged Orica hack. 

Out of 12 team members listed in the project’s ICO, five have deleted their LinkedIn profiles — Zey, legal counsel Ivan, process manager Karim, IT project manager Pouriya and business development manager Rilwan. The others, save for Zey, were either unreachable or had left Orica by the time of its breakdown. 

The Orica founding team became unreachable after last year. Source: CryptoTotem

A mixed legacy 

As of today, most of what remains of Orica is in the brick and stone of a school in Uganda and the artists it has helped.

But also remaining are the tokenholders who never received a proper explanation as to why the project has ceased to exist. Despite breaking his silence, Zey never addressed the reasons for the hiatus, and many questions remain unanswered. 

It’s not uncommon to see that investors and co-founders alike build rapport around a project as friends and exit as enemies during its collapse. But for Orica, there was at least a brief moment in which everything seemed to have worked well.

Cointelegraph editor Zhiyuan Sun contributed to this story. 

Related: Crypto developer commits $2M rug pull fraud to fuel gambling addiction

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon

Vitalik Buterin and Polygon co-founder to help send $100M toward COVID-19 research

Research into “Long COVID” and furthering medical infrastructure development will be the two main focus areas for Buterin.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is working with India-based crypto fund Crypto Relief and Polygon co founder Sandeep Nailwal to send $100 million towards COVID-19 research and medical infrastructure development in India.

Buterin and Nailwal will receive $90 million in USD Coin (USDC) from Crypto Relief, while Buterin will provide $10 million out of his own pocket to further the cause. The two will then help distribute the funds. 

According to a January 2022 Twitter post from Nailwal, Crypto Relief will transfer the funds to Buterin in order for the India-based crypto fund to remain in full compliance with their local laws.

The first installment went towards tackling the COVID-19 pandemic in India through “emergency humanitarian relief.”

Crypto Relief describes itself as a community-run fund which has delivered financial relief to India during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Buterin explained in a June 8 Twitter post that COVID-19 and “future pandemics” will continue to be a “large risk in the 21st century.” According to Buterin, we need a “global solution” that combines “frontier scientific innovation” and “on-the-ground implementation.”

Buterin said much of the COVID-19 research will focus on COVID-19 airborne transmission by building better medical equipment.

“This includes improving ventilation, HEPA filtering, and experimental tech like UVC irradiation,” he said.

The other main research area will focus on “Long COVID,” Buterin added.

“The most salient risks from Covid today are the very high number of people experiencing very-long-term symptoms (aka #LongCovid), and so Long Covid research continues to be a primary focus.”

Additionally, Buterin explained that the $100 million will be disbursed to a Gnosis Safe wallet using the following contract address.

Related: The virus killer: How blockchain contributes to the fight against COVID-19

The first $100 million donation was deployed by Buterin in late January 2022 or soon after, which initially came in the form of Shiba Inu (SHIB).

It isn’t the first philanthropic effort of Buterin’s either.

In April 2022, Buterin sent $5 million worth of Ether (ETH) donations to “Aid for Ukraine” to assist its defence against Russia’s invasion in February 2022.

As of November 26, Crypto Relief has managed to raise $473 million in funds, according to the firm’s website.

Cointelegraph reached out to Crypto Relief to get a more up-to-date figure but did not receive an immediate response.

Magazine: Joe Lubin — The truth about ETH founders split and ‘Crypto Google’

BRICS Set to Welcome 9 Nations as Partners—Russia Hints 4 More to Join Soon