1. Home
  2. Equity

Equity

Is MicroStrategy a bubble? What is the risk for Bitcoin’s price?

MicroStrategy offers leveraged Bitcoin exposure, amplifying risk but potentially offering higher returns with repurchasing options.

MicroStrategy’s aggressive Bitcoin (BTC) acquisition strategy has captivated investors, but is it sustainable? With plans to raise $42 billion in three years, the company is taking bold steps to finance its Bitcoin buying spree.

For retail investors, the question isn’t just whether MicroStrategy’s moves are driving Bitcoin above $100,000—it’s whether this approach is stable or setting the stage for a bubble.

MicroStrategy’s “21/21 Plan” outlines a massive capital raise, split evenly between equity sales and fixed-income securities. Recently, it raised $4.6 billion by selling 13.6 million shares, alongside a $2.6 billion convertible bond issuance. Together, these raised enough to buy 78,890 Bitcoin ($6.62 billion), underscoring the company’s commitment to its strategy.

Read more

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

MicroStrategy buys $4.6B of Bitcoin as price hits new highs

MicroStrategy acquired an additional 51,780 BTC worth $4.6 billion, boosting its total holdings to 331,200 Bitcoin as BTC prices hit record highs above $92,400.

MicroStrategy, one of the world’s largest public holders of Bitcoin, continued stacking BTC even as the cryptocurrency broke new highs.

On Nov. 18, MicroStrategy announced it purchased 51,780 Bitcoin (BTC) for about $4.6 billion at an average price of $88,627 per BTC.

With the latest acquisition, MicroStrategy’s total Bitcoin holdings have grown to 331,200 BTC, purchased at an aggregate cost of $16.5 billion. The average price per Bitcoin across all purchases is $49,874.

Read more

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

Analysts Link Bitcoin Rally to Trump’s Election Odds – Microstrategy Gains Set Stage for a Breakout

Analysts Link Bitcoin Rally to Trump’s Election Odds – Microstrategy Gains Set Stage for a BreakoutAnalysts at global research and brokerage firm Bernstein say bitcoin’s surge is fueled by Donald Trump’s rising chances in the 2024 election. They point to Microstrategy’s stock, soaring 191% this year, as a key signal of a looming market breakout. With Trump leading in key swing states, his election odds are igniting a stronger crypto […]

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

Analyst Heralds Multi-Year Bull Market For Gold: $8,000 per Ounce at Play

Analyst Heralds Multi-Year Bull Market For Gold: ,000 per Ounce at PlayJan Nieuwenhuijs, a gold market analyst, has predicted a new multi-year bull market for gold. According to different factors, including the low percentage of gold as part of the global international reserves, and the size of the equity market, gold prices might be preparing to rise, putting prices of $8,000 per ounce in the realm […]

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

‘He broke his word’ — Ex-ConsenSys staff sue founder over employee equity deal

ConsenSys founder Joseph Lubin has been named in a new lawsuit filed in New York by over two dozen former ConsenSys employees.

Over two dozen former employees of Ethereum infrastructure firm ConsenSys have filed a fresh lawsuit against the firm’s founder and CEO, Joseph Lubin, over claims he diluted employee equity shares against earlier promises.

The former staff allege that Lubin — who is also a co-founder of Ethereum — breached this “no-dilution promise” made in 2015, according to the plaintiff’s Oct. 19 filing in a New York Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs allege Lubin lured in “smart and motivated” colleagues to work for ConsenSys in late 2014, claiming the firm would become the “future of cryptocurrency” and the “crypto Google.”

Around that time, Lubins allegedly stated in a document that he wouldn’t dilute employee equity shares; the plaintiffs allege he later broke that promise.

“It is my intention that the percentage ConsenSys members receive will not be diluted by additional issuance,” the document reportedly wrote.

The plaintiffs argued Lubin didn’t just break the promise but also “got rich” off it while they “got nothing.”

“He broke his word [and] he violated his legal commitments and duties. While Lubin got rich, Plaintiffs got nothing.”

The plaintiffs, who held shares in Swiss-based holding company ConsenSys AG — formerly ConsenSys Mesh — claim the shares were rendered “worthless” when Lubin transferred cryptocurrency wallet MetaMask and other assets to its new United States-based entity in 2020.

Excerpt from the lawsuit brought by former ConsenSys employees. Source: New York Supreme Court

The plaintiffs also named investment bank JPMorgan — as one of the seven defendants — alleging it ”played a pivotal role” in negotiating the asset transfer and became a new equity holder in the new U.S. entity:

“Lubin, his inner circle, and JPMorgan kept the details of the negotiations secret—Plaintiffs were left in the dark.

“Lubin did not bring over many of his early employees—the Plaintiffs here—as equity holders in the new company. Instead, they continued to hold shares in the far less valuable entity that had been stripped of its assets,” the plaintiffs added.

ConsenSys says plaintiffs claims are ‘meritless’

Speaking to Cointelegraph, a ConsenSys spokesperson called the claims "frivolous," saying the plaintiffs are now trying their luck in the U.S. legal arena after “two years of getting nowhere with their frivolous claims” in a Swiss court.

Related: ConsenSys founder ‘bullish’ on Ethereum following crypto winter performance

“[The] plaintiffs now believe their meritless claims stand a better chance of yielding a pay day if they game U.S. courts and entangle ConsenSys Software and other unrelated parties in litigation.” The ConsenSys representative added:

“We fully expect that the plaintiffs, who were never employees of Consensys Software, will soon find this gambit is another fruitless attempt to enrich themselves from the success of others.”

Despite claims that the plaintiff’s legal challenge went “nowhere” in Switzerland, the country’s High Court of Zug issued a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs say the ruling supports their position that Lubin breached his duties.

ConsenSys was founded in October 2014, about nine months before the Ethereum blockchain launched in mid-2015.

The firm develops and hosts infrastructure projects that underpins much of the Ethereum network.

The plaintiffs are seeking damages across six separate causes of action, in an amount to be determined at trial.

Magazine: Joe Lubin: The truth about ETH founders split and ‘Crypto Google’

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

Iman Europe and The Agenda chat mental health, music, Web3 and The Homies DAO

Musician and The Homies DAO founder Iman Europe sat down with The Agenda podcast to discuss how her Web3-based project promotes wellness among music workers.

Talk to any musician who has “made it,” and they’ll say that achieving fame is both a gift and a curse. While success in entertainment can obviously bring many positives, it also carries the pressure to stay relevant, the worry of constantly needing to stay connected to fans, and the loss of freedom and privacy that comes with being a regular Joe — all of which can be utterly exhausting. Add a jam-packed events schedule that robs artists of the time to detox and socialize, and fame begins to look like just as much a burden as it may be a blessing.

On the flip side, those aspiring to break through and finally go mainstream deal with the pressure of an uphill climb and the potential outcome that after all the struggle, there might not be a light at the end of the tunnel.

For this reason, mental health, wellness and feeling like one is plugged into a community are things all creators need to allocate time to, and The Homies DAO is focused on just that.

On Episode 17 of The Agenda podcast, hosts Ray Salmond and Jonathan DeYoung speak with singer and The Homies DAO founder Iman Europe about how the collective is using Web3 to bring artists together to focus on wellbeing.

A safe space for artists to breathe, relax and socialize

During the conversation, Europe detailed how lonely being a musician can feel and how difficult it can be to maintain social connections, given that sometimes it seems like family members are constantly hitting you up for money and perks, and strangers you connect with might have the ulterior motive of getting special benefits thanks to their new-found friend’s fame.

“I know a lot of artists felt very burnt out last year and felt like they couldn’t find their footing oftentimes because everything was moving so fast in Web3,” she said. “And so I saw the need for wellness in the space, and I also was needing it. I was juggling being an artist and the head of artist relations of Sound.xyz, and it was a lot. They were two full-time jobs, and I wasn’t making enough time for myself and my wellness, and I saw the effects of that.”

This inspired Europe to found The Homies DAO. “When I got to the end of the year, I knew I wanted to focus this year on wellness more and on being able to give that back to myself and also creating space for artists to do the same.”

When asked about the type of wellness and community activities Homies DAO members could participate in, Europe mentioned that the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) provides a safe space and community where creators participating in the music industry can socialize, unwind, meditate, work out and engage in activity that offers a sense of community.

“We’re hosting our first event at the end of this month, the Homies Hangout, where we’ll have different forms of wellness. So it’ll be physical wellness — we’ll start with exercise, riding the bikes and spinning. This will be hosted at Burn Cycling. So we’ll start off with that, and then we’ll take a break and then come back for a sound bath, which is spiritual wellness. And then we’ll do some affirmations, and we’ll have someone come in and lead a group therapy session where we can all kind of talk together and talk about mental wellness and different resources to bettering that.”

As for the DAO’s future plans, “We plan to do a few things like monthly meetups like that, but also monthly meetups online where we’re able to just check in with each other and just have a space for that,” said Europe, adding:

“We later plan to do like educational content and just creating different content to bring more people on-chain. We want to create and mint projects through our DAO with the artists, maybe based around wellness. And our hopes are later to expand to offline retreats for artists, artist residencies.”

The Homies aims to put the focus on people instead of the pursuit of profit

Like a handful of the other crypto and Web3-focused DAOs in the space, The Homies DAO also has a nonfungible token (NFT) collection, with holders entitled to DAO membership and various other perks. Generally, projects with tokens or NFTs also have to contend with price speculators and NFT investors who don’t contribute anything to the project.

On the matter, Europe said, “I didn’t want to make this speculative. I wanted to make this more so of a community. They are limited. I think we’ll only have 500 members total right now.”

Related: YouTube releases ‘principles’ for working with music industry on AI tech

When asked why she’s not currently concerned with floor prices, increasing the collective’s size, or even partnering with blue-chip projects, Europe replied:

“We’ll only have 500 because we really want to know each other, and we’re really trying to build a community, not just like a project. I think that’s the difference between a DAO and a project, is you want as many people to be on it as possible. But I think when we think of wellness, it is an intimate thing. And sometimes when you make it more about like clout and, I don’t know, speculation, it loses its truth, and it loses its power to really do what we want to do in this wellness.”

To hear more from Iman Europe’s conversation with The Agenda — including details on some major future plans for The Homies DAO — listen to the full episode on Cointelegraph’s Podcasts page, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows!

Magazine: Tokenizing music royalties as NFTs could help the next Taylor Swift

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

First Citizens Bank Acquires Silicon Valley Bank, Costing FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund an Estimated $20B

First Citizens Bank Acquires Silicon Valley Bank, Costing FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund an Estimated BAccording to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the troubled bank Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was acquired by First Citizens Bank & Trust Company, which is based in Raleigh, North Carolina. First Citizens acquired all deposits and loans from SVB, as well as the 17 branches that SVB owned across the United States. Silicon Valley […]

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

US Treasury and White House to Hold Regular Meetings on CBDCs and Payment Innovations

US Treasury and White House to Hold Regular Meetings on CBDCs and Payment InnovationsOn March 1, 2023, Nellie Liang, undersecretary for domestic finance at the U.S. Treasury, delivered a speech to the Atlantic Council in Washington concerning the subject of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Liang detailed during her speech that a CBDC is one of several options for “upgrading the legacy capabilities of central bank money,” and […]

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

Angel investors vs. venture capitalists

Angel investors are seed-stage financiers who offer mentorship to nascent businesses for equity, while venture capitalists inject substantial capital into later-stage firms.

Angel investors and venture capitalists are two types of private investors who provide funding for early-stage and growth-stage companies. However, there are some key differences between them that we will cover in this article.

Who are angel investors?

High-net-worth individuals who invest in companies at an early stage in exchange for equity in the business are known as angel investors. They frequently invest their own funds and take a more active approach to investment, offering advice and mentoring to the businesses they support. The well-known angel investors in the crypto world include:

  • Roger Ver — He is known as “Bitcoin Jesus” and is an early investor in Bitcoin (BTC) startups, such as Blockchain.info, BitPay and Kraken.
  • Barry Silbert — He is the founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group, which invests in and acquires cryptocurrency-related companies.
  • Naval Ravikant — He is the co-founder of AngelList and has invested in projects such as MetaStable, Algorand and others.
  • Charlie Lee — He is the creator of Litecoin and has invested in a number of other cryptocurrency-related startups.

Who are venture capitalists?

Investors who fund startups and early-stage businesses with significant room for growth are known as venture capitalists (VCs). They frequently belong to a professional investment firm or fund and typically make larger investments than angel investors.

Related: Venture capital financing: A beginner’s guide to VC funding in the crypto space

They obtain equity in the business in return for their investment, and they frequently have a say in how the business is operated. When the firm eventually goes public or is acquired, VCs hope to profit by selling their equity. Some well-known VC firms include:

  • Andreessen Horowitz
  • Blockchain Capital
  • Coinbase Ventures
  • Digital Currency Group
  • Polychain Capital
  • Pantera Capital.

Differences between angel investors and venture capitalists

Stage of investment

Angel investors frequently contribute seed money to startups by making investments in early-stage businesses. On the other hand, venture capitalists frequently make investments in later-stage businesses that have already demonstrated strong growth potential.

Size of investment

Compared to venture capitalists, angel investors often invest less money. Unlike venture capitalists, who might invest millions of dollars in a firm, angel investors often make investments between $10,000 and $100,000.

Involvement in the company

Angel investors frequently adopt a hands-off strategy and do not actively participate in the company’s operations. On the contrary, venture capitalists frequently support the management of the businesses they invest in, both strategically and operationally.

Exit strategy

Angel investors often have a longer investment horizon and can withdraw their money through an initial public offering (IPO), merger or acquisition. Conversely, venture investors often want to sell their investments within a period of five to seven years through an IPO or acquisition.

Source of funds

High-net-worth individuals who invest their own money are angel investors. On the other side, venture capitalists oversee money for high-net-worth individuals or institutional investors and use that money to make investments.

Risk tolerance

Angel investors are generally more willing to take on higher levels of risk than venture capitalists, who are more focused on minimizing risk.

Investment criteria

Angel investors may be more flexible in their investment criteria, while venture capitalists have more stringent criteria and require companies to meet specific milestones and targets.

Portfolio diversification

Angel investors tend to have a more diverse portfolio, while venture capitalists may have a more concentrated portfolio with a focus on a specific industry or sector.

Weaknesses of angel investment vs. venture capital

The above differences highlight the approaches and priorities of angel investors and venture capitalists in the cryptocurrency industry. Both have their own weaknesses, and startups may choose to work with both depending on their specific needs and goals.

The weaknesses of angel investments include:

  • Limited funds: Angel investors frequently invest less money than venture capitalists, which may restrict the size of firms they may support.
  • Lack of due diligence: When making investment decisions, angel investors may rely too heavily on instinct and personal relationships, which might raise the chance of failure.
  • Long-term commitment: Angel investments are typically made for the long term and may not offer an exit option for either the investor or the startup.

The weaknesses of venture capital include:

  • High expectations: Venture investors frequently have high standards for companies and may ask them to achieve particular benchmarks and goals.
  • Short-term focus: Venture capitalists are frequently driven to realize their investments within a specific time frame and often have a stated exit strategy.
  • Control: Venture capitalists may have little power to influence important decisions in the firms they fund.

Regardless of the above shortcomings, the process of securing funding from investors can help validate a startup’s business model and increase its visibility in the market.

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge

Layer1 CEO alleges co-founder is using majority power to ‘ransack’ company

The plaintiffs claim the Dolic and Ebel began to conduct unauthorized business activities when the corporate governance of its parent company, Enigma, collapsed.

The CEO of crypto miner Layer1 Technologies has filed a lawsuit against the firm’s two other board members — including co-founder Jakov Dolic — for allegedly commandeering Layer1's operations for their own gain. 

Chief executive John Harney and DGF Investments Inc — a British Virgin Islands-based investment firm — filed the lawsuit against Dolic and fellow board member Tobias Ebel in Delaware’s Chancery Court on Feb. 2.

The lawsuit alleges that both Dolic and Ebel used a power vacuum at Layer1’s equity parent Enigma to seize control of the Bitcoin mining company and operate it as their "own personal fiefdom.”

Harney and DGF Investments Inc — which owns a majority stake in Enigma — claim the defendants have "usurped the authority" of Layer1's CEO and prevented Harney from "responsibly operating Layer1."

One of the accusations made against Dolic and Ebel alleges they executed “large unauthorized transactions” that were not recorded in Layer1’s financial reporting and that they use Layer1’s operations to mine Bitcoin (BTC) and keep the revenue for themselves:

“Dolic and his loyalists” have “wielded their majority board control to ransack Layer1, operating it for their own benefit and engaging in self-dealing transactions with impunity.”

The plaintiffs also claimed that Dolic continues to press the false narrative that he owns 77% of Layer1’s equity. In the filing, the plaintiffs argued that Dolic sold all of his Layer1 stock to Enigma for $16 million on Jan. 24, 2022.

Harney and DGF Investments’ court filing in the Delaware court. Source. Bloomberg Law.

Harney and DGF have stressed that without imminent judicial intervention to confirm that Enigma has 100% ownership of Layer1, there is nothing that can stop Dolic and Ebel from "operating" the company "for their own benefit."

Related: Argo Blockchain accused of misleading investors in class-action lawsuit

The latest lawsuit filed against Dolic and Ebel alleges a breach of fiduciary duty, pursuant to section 226 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

The Plaintiffs are hoping to seek relief from the court via an injunction, have their fees paid for by the defendants and order an appointed custodian to run the company.

Layer1 Technologies was the first United States-based Bitcoin mining company to have fully integrated renewable energy into its operations, according to a 2020 report.

Cointelegraph reached out to Dolic for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Bitcoin’s Astronomical Returns: 14,211 New Millionaires and 4 New Billionaires Emerge