1. Home
  2. gray gensler

gray gensler

SEC steps back from defining digital assets in new hedge fund rules

The SEC and its staff are “continuing to consider” the term “digital assets” despite proposing a definition of the term around nine months ago.

The United States securities regulator is holding off from ratifying the definition of the term “digital assets” in rules that govern reporting disclosures for hedge and private equity funds, despite proposing to do so some nine months ago.

On May 3 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published amendments to Form PF — a form that SEC-registered funds complete to disclose basic information about their fund so the regulator can assess potential “systemic risks.”

The SEC originally included a digital assets definition in an August 2022 proposal for the changes. If it went into effect, it would have been the first time the SEC defined “digital assets.”

Fast forward to today and the regulator says it's not going ahead with adding the definition, at least for now.

“We proposed adding ‘digital assets’ as a new term to the Form PF Glossary of Terms. The Commission and staff are continuing to consider this term and are not adopting ‘digital assets’ as part of this rule at this time.”

The definition the SEC put forward for digital assets was an asset “that is issued and/or transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology” and included other commonly used terms such as “virtual currencies,” “coins” and “tokens.”

The SEC said in its August proposal that currently, information regarding a fund's digital assets are reported in an “other” category and results in “less robust Form PF data for analysis.”

It proposed the definition in order to obtain separate, and by extension, more accurate reporting on such assets.

“We believe it is important to collect information on funds’ exposures to digital assets in order to understand better their overall market exposures.”

However, the latest updates to the SEC’s Form PF rules now require — among other new requirements — that SEC-registered funds report the occurrence of key events that could indicate systemic risk or harm to investors in a likely response to the U.S. banking crisis.

Related: SEC’s war on crypto: How far will it go?

Firms must also disclose details of their fees and expenses as the SEC tries to cast a light on the multi-trillion dollar sector.

The SEC hasn’t always shied away from crypto-related definitions, announcing in mid-April that it would revisit its definition of an “exchange” to possibly include decentralized finance (DeFi).

SEC chair Gary Gensler has also long been vocal on his claim that cryptocurrencies are securities under his Commissions remit and the U.S. crypto sector is acting afoul of securities laws.

Hall of Flame: Crypto Wendy on trashing the SEC, sexism, and how underdogs can win

Dogecoin to $5? It’s possible according to a ‘Gaussian channel’ model 

​​Stablecoins and Ether are ‘going to be commodities,’ reaffirms CFTC chair

In the tug-of-war between the US regulators over control of crypto assets, the CFTC chair has triple-downed his stance — that Ether and stablecoins are commodities.

Stablecoins and Ether (ETH) are commodities and should come under the purview of the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), its chairman has again asserted at a recent Senate hearing.

At the Mar. 8 Senate Agricultural hearing, CFTC chair, Rostin Behnam, was asked by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand about the differing views held by the regulator and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) following the CFTC’s 2021 settlement with stablecoin issuer Tether, Behnam said:

“Notwithstanding a regulatory framework around stablecoins, they’re going to be commodities in my view.”

“It was clear to our enforcement team and the commission that Tether, a stablecoin, was a commodity,” he added.

In the past, the CFTC has asserted that certain digital assets such as Ether, Bitcoin (BTC) and Tether (USDT) were commodities — such as in its lawsuit against FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried in mid-December.

Asked what evidence the CFTC would put forward to win regulatory influence over Ether during the Senate hearing, Behnam said it “would not have allowed” Ether futures products to be listed on CFTC exchanges if it “did not feel strongly that it was a commodity asset,” and added:

“We have litigation risk, we have agency credibility risk if we do something like that without serious legal defenses to support our argument that [the] asset is a commodity.”

The comment has seemingly cemented Behnam's sometimes wavering opinion on the classification of Ether. During an invite-only event at Princeton University in November last year he said Bitcoin was the only cryptocurrency that could be viewed as a commodity, leaving out Ether. Only a month before that, he suggested Ether could be viewed as a commodity too.

Related: CFTC continues to explore digital asset policy considerations in MRAC meeting

Behnam’s most recent comments oppose a view held by SEC chair, Gary Gensler, who claimed in a Feb. 23 New York Magazine interview that “everything other than Bitcoin” is a security, a claim that was rebuffed by multiple crypto lawyers.

The differing viewpoints of the market regulators could set the stage for a conflict as each vies for regulatory control of the crypto industry.

In mid-Febuary, the SEC flexed its authority against stablecoin issuer Paxos saying it may sue the firm for violating investor protection laws alleging its Binance USD (BUSD) stablecoin is an unregistered security.

Around the same time, the regulator similarly targeted Terraform Labs and called its algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD Classic (USTC) a security, a move Delphi Labs general counsel, Gabriel Shapiro, said could be a “roadmap” for how the SEC could structure future suits against other stablecoin issuers.

The SEC’s crypto clampdowns have seen pushback front he industry, Circle founder and CEO, Jeremy Allaire said he doesn’t believe “the SEC is the regulator for stablecoins” saying they should be overseen by a banking regulator.

Dogecoin to $5? It’s possible according to a ‘Gaussian channel’ model 

Ripple’s allies expand: Coinbase files amicus brief in fight against SEC

Crypto exchange Coinbase has filed documentation asking permission to help Ripple Labs in its ongoing legal battle with the SEC.

United States-based crypto exchange Coinbase has become the latest organization to stand behind Ripple Labs in its legal battle against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which could wrap up as soon as the first half of 2023.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer in a series of tweets on Oct. 31 said the exchange had asked the presiding judge for permission to file an amicus brief, saying the case was a “textbook” definition of “just how critical fair notice is.”

An amicus brief, known as a “friend of the court,” is a legal document containing advice or information relating to a court case from an organization or individual that is not directly involved in the case.

Grewal added that a fundamental protection under the U.S. Constitution is that authorities can’t “condemn conduct as a violation of law without providing fair notice that the conduct is illegal.”

“By suing sellers of XRP tokens after making public statements signaling that those transactions were lawful, the SEC has lost sight of this bedrock principle,” he added.

If approved, Coinbase will join the ranks of the non-profit organization Investor Choice Advocates Network and crypto mobile app SpendTheBits which were granted permission to file amicus briefs in October.

Related: ‘Well worth the fight’ — Ripple counsel confirms Hinman docs are in their hands

The filing also comes on the same day cryptocurrency lawyer John Deaton filed a motion seeking permission to submit an amicus brief on behalf of the XRP “decentralized community.”

It also follows days after crypto advocacy group the Blockchain Association also announced its support for Ripple on Oct. 28 by announcing it had filed its ow amicus brief, noting that SEC chairman Gary Gensler’s views on securities laws could have “devastating effects” on the space.

Ripple Labs has been caught up in a nearly two-year-long legal saga with the SEC that regards the sale of its Ripple (XRP) tokens as unregistered securities sales.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse on an Oct. 11 panel at DC Fintech Week said he thinks the case could be wrapped up by the half of 2023 but admitted it would be hard to predict an exact end date.

Dogecoin to $5? It’s possible according to a ‘Gaussian channel’ model