Hester Peirce

‘No Rhyme or Reason’ – SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce Blasts Her Own Agency’s Handling of US Crypto Industry

December 1, 2023 The Daily Hodl

Ripple General Counsel Calls LBRY Lawsuit an Injustice, Urges SEC Commissioner To Speak Out Louder and Sooner

October 31, 2023 The Daily Hodl

SEC Commissioner Releases Statement of Dissent Regarding Regulator’s Case Against LBRY

October 30, 2023 The Daily Hodl

Not Regulators’ Job to Tell Americans What They Can and Can’t Speculate On: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce

October 23, 2023 The Daily Hodl

SEC’s Hester Peirce Blasts Agency’s First NFT Lawsuit, Says Enforcement Action Raises Many Difficult Questions

August 30, 2023 The Daily Hodl

Hester Peirce: US crypto laws can’t assume ‘everything is a financial asset’

June 29, 2023 Coin Telegraph

blockchain laws

SEC commissioner Hester Peirce discussed a possible U.S. crypto legal framework, giving a reminder that not all uses are financial.

Cryptocurrency laws in the United States should be “reserved” and not regulate the technology as though every use is financial, argues a commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

On June 29, Commissioner Hester Peirce — dubbed “Crypto Mom” — appeared remotely at Australian Blockchain Week and was asked how she would regulate crypto, answering:

“I think we have to make sure that whatever regulatory framework you have doesn't just assume that everything is a financial asset.”

Peirce explained while crypto is thought of in “very financial terms” other uses exist such as enabling people to interact without requiring a centralized entity.

“That's useful in the financial context, but it's also useful in building a social media platform or whatever else,” she said.

Protecting investors is important, but the government needs to have a good reason to prevent people from investing their own money as they choose: https://t.co/QgPm38iSrp
— Hester Peirce (@HesterPeirce) June 27, 2023

Peirce believes any legal framework should take “a reserved approach” but include “enough clarity that people feel that they can try things.”

“There is something to be said for not putting a framework in place that is so inflexible that it doesn't accommodate the new uses of crypto and blockchain.”

In a seeming swipe at the SEC’s current approach — which many have criticized including Peirce — the commissioner said the laws “can't be reserved then, all of a sudden, [regulators] come in five years later with a bunch of enforcement actions.”

Asked about her crypto advocacy, Peirce said she thinks the SEC “can do better” and believes if she can't speak freely, “then I don't know why I'm in that position.”

“Crypto presents [the SEC] an opportunity to rethink how we approach innovation [...] I really think we've been taking an approach that is not appropriate,” she said.

Alluding to the collapse of FTX and the allegations of misconduct that followed, Peirce advised the crypto industry to undertake self-regulation and pay attention to counterparty risks, conflicts of interest and leverage.

“Those are things you don't need a government regulator to tell you to do, but I think government regulators can play a role in that.”

Magazine: Bitcoin 2023 in Miami comes to grips with ‘shitcoins on Bitcoin’

SEC Commissioner Issues Warning, Says US About To Fall Behind Europe and UK in Crypto Industry: Report

May 15, 2023 The Daily Hodl

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce States Proposed Amendments to Definition of ‘Exchange’ Render Innovation ‘Kaput’

April 17, 2023 Bitcoin.com

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce Details Dissent Against Gary Gensler’s Anti-Crypto Agenda

April 16, 2023 The Daily Hodl

SEC proposes tougher rules as part of its crypto custody crackdown

February 16, 2023 Coin Telegraph

Advisers

The new proposals set forth by the Gensler-led SEC seek to “expand the scope” of rules set out by the 2009 Custody Rules.

A five-member panel of the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has voted 4-1 in favor of a proposal that may make it more difficult for cryptocurrency firms to serve as digital asset custodians in the future.

The proposal, which is yet to be officially approved by the SEC, recommends amendments to the “2009 Custody Rule” will apply to custodians of “all assets” including cryptocurrencies, according to a Feb. 15 statement from SEC Chairman Gary Gensler.

Gensler stated that currently, some crypto trading platforms that are offering custody services are not actual “qualified custodians.”

According to the SEC, a qualified custodian is generally a federal or state-chartered bank or savings association, trust company, a registered broker-dealer, a registered futures commission merchant, or a foreign financial institution.

In order to become a “qualified custodian” under the newly proposed rules, U.S. and offshore firms would additionally need to ensure that all custodied assets — including cryptocurrencies — are properly segregated, while these custodians will be required to jump through additional hoops such as annual audits from public accountants, among other transparency measures.

We @SECGov just proposed to expand & enhance the role of qualified custodians when registered investment advisers custody assets on behalf of investors.

Thru our rule, investors would get the time-tested protections—and qualified custodians—they deserve.

What does this mean? ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/RerUGnpArI
— Gary Gensler (@GaryGensler) February 15, 2023

While Gensler said these amendments would “expand the scope” to all asset classes, he specifically took a shot at the crypto industry:

“Make no mistake: Today’s rule, the 2009 rule, covers a significant amount of crypto assets. [...] Further, though some crypto trading and lending platforms may claim to custody investors’ crypto, that does not mean they are qualified custodians. Rather than properly segregating investors’ crypto, these platforms have commingled those assets with their own crypto or other investors’ crypto.”

“When these platforms go bankrupt—something we’ve seen time and again recently—investors’ assets often have become property of the failed company, leaving investors in line at the bankruptcy court,” the SEC Chairman added.

Gensler also pointed to the industry's track record to suggest that few crypto firms would be reliable enough to serve as qualified custodians:

“Make no mistake: Based upon how crypto platforms generally operate, investment advisers cannot rely on them as qualified custodians.”

However, not every SEC member is on board with Gensler’s plans.

Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement in response to the proposed rule changes on investment adviser custody set out by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler. Source: SEC.

While the proposal isn’t “regulation by enforcement” per se, Commissioner Hester Peirce said “the latest SEC statement seems designed for immediate effect” to take down the crypto industry:

“Such sweeping statements in a rule proposal seem designed for immediate effect, a function proposing releases should not play. These statements encourage investment advisers to back away immediately from advising their clients with respect to crypto.”

As for the proposal itself, Peirce believes it would do more harm than good.

She explained that such stringent measures will force investors to remove their assets from entities that have developed sufficient safeguarding procedures to mitigate and prevent fraud and theft:

“The proposal would expand the reach of the custody requirements to crypto assets while likely shrinking the ranks of qualified crypto custodians. By insisting on an asset neutral approach to custody we could leave investors in crypto assets more vulnerable to theft or fraud, not less.”

As for the next steps, Peirce noted the agency will soon schedule in a 60-day comment period once the proposal has been published in the Federal Register.

However, the commissioner is concerned that this timeframe isn’t sufficient to allow the public to analyze all aspects of the proposal.

Those who voted in favor of the proposal are hoping to implement the new rules within 12-18 months, according to Peirce, adding that it was an "aggressive timeline" given the changes being proposed

Share this video