data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa626/fa6264491fac05d5bfd382913f3b29f17d981101" alt="Report: Paraguayan Bitcoin Mining Industry Provides Fewer Than 400 Jobs Report: Paraguayan Bitcoin Mining Industry Provides Fewer Than 400 Jobs"
SpiritSwap previously had its entire treasury drained due to the ongoing Multichain exploit.
SpiritSwap, a decentralized exchange (DEX) on Fantom, will no longer shut its doors in September after having treasury funds stuck on troubled cross-chain protocol Multichain.
In an Aug. 16 community vote, SpiritSwap users passed a resolution to transfer the project to Power, a fellow nonfungible token platform and DEX that is also based on Fantom. In consideration, Power will deploy 200,000 USD Coin (USDC) into the SpiritSwap treasury.
“Initially, I had requested a deposit of 20-30K to the treasury to cover the essential costs of SpiritSwap. However, the Power team is willing to go above and beyond by depositing 200,000 USDC," wrote Nzaru, head manager at SpiritSwap, who announced that he would depart the DEX after receiving a new job offer. “On the 30th, I will finalize the new team and conduct orientation sessions to prepare for the upcoming month,” he said.
Prior to the acquisition, Power developers stated: “We have the means and the desire to inherent SpiritSwap. This would be a direct benefit to the PNFT holders, the POWER community, and the SpiritSwap community.”
On Aug. 9, SpiritSwap said it would wind down operations by Sept. 1 if it could not find a team to take over after the Multichain exploit drained its entire treasury. Interestingly, Power was also exposed to the Multichain fiasco but only suffered “small” losses, as its treasury assets were not bridged to Multichain.
After months of speculation, Multichain’s developers disclosed in July that co-founder and CEO Zhanojung He was arrested by Chinese police back in May on undisclosed charges. He allegedly held all access to Multichain private keys and servers for the $1.5 billion protocol when he was detained. Despite a lack of information on his detention, funds belonging to Multichain and its users have been swapped for stablecoins as well as private coins and transferred out of the protocol. Some victims have since alleged that the Chinese police are involved in an elaborate embezzlement scheme involving users’ funds.
Magazine: China’s risky Bitcoin court decision, is Huobi in trouble or not?
The Bitcoin network has a 31:1 positive to negative ratio according to climate tech VC Daniel Batten.
A climate tech investor has painted a bright view of the Bitcoin (BTC) network, suggesting BTC’s environmental positives outweigh its negatives by a whopping 31:1 ratio.
On Jan. 12, self-proclaimed philanthropist and environmentalist Daniel Batten claimed in a Twitter thread that “Bitcoin is probably the most important ESG technology of our time.”
According to Batten, the 31:1 positive impact ratio was calculated by researching and interviewing grid engineers, climate scientists, BTC mining engineers, methane abatement experts, and solar and wind installers.
The findings discovered 21 ways Bitcoin could be an environmental positive and just five ways it could be an environmental negative.
1/7
— Daniel Batten (@DSBatten) January 12, 2023
Environmentally, Bitcoin has a positive:negative ratio of 31:1
This mean Bitcoin is probably the most important ESG technology of our time
As a fund manager I'd opine its gross negligence for an ESG investor not to consider it in their mix
Here's a data summary
pic.twitter.com/Lbk0lWAA79
Batten said that the findings were “uncannily similar” to those for the solar industry.
Many of the positives involved renewable energy grids and benefits from mining such as being the leading technology for responding to grid power demand from over and undersupply. Bitcoin mining farms can be switched on or off depending on power demand constraints.
Additionally, BTC mining can be a solution for geographic curtailment. Power curtailment is a deliberate reduction in the output below what could be produced to balance energy supply and demand, or due to transmission constraints.
There are also benefits in innovation and methane reduction, according to Batten’s findings.
BTC mining can be used to reduce vented landfill gas and flare gas emissions by using this otherwise wasted energy to power rigs.
The handful of negatives included network emission levels, e-waste production, and the opening up of previous fossil fuel sites. However, the environmental positives far outweighed these negatives, according to Batten who opined:
“Bitcoin mining’s rapid renewable adoption can inspire other industry sectors to follow.”
“We see Bitcoin mining can play a real part in global methane mitigation,” he concluded.
Related: Bitcoin could become a zero-emission network: Report
On Jan. 13, the SCMP opposed the notion that Bitcoin was good for the environment by reporting that BTC accounted for 86.3 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2022.
However, it did acknowledge that Ethereum saw its CO2 emissions drop from 21.95 million tons in 2021 to 8,824 tons last year, according to the data from Forex Suggest. The Ethereum Merge and switch to proof-of-stake last year reduced network power consumption by 99.98%.