1. Home
  2. redacted

redacted

Names of non-US FTX users demanded by mainstream media outlets

A number of mainstream media outlets are pushing to publicize the personal details of FTX’s non-U.S. customers, similar to what happened with Celsius.

Some mainstream media outlets have objected to attempts to withhold the identities of non-United States customers of cryptocurrency exchange FTX during its bankruptcy proceedings.

In an April 4 filing to a Delaware Bankruptcy Court, media outlets Bloomberg, The Financial Times, The New York Times, and its parent firm the Dow Jones & Company jointly objected to the names of the customers being redacted, arguing the press and public have "a presumptive right of access to bankruptcy filings.”

While FTX’s debtors are able to argue for the names of creditors to be redacted in bankruptcy filings — and have done so — the media outlets believe FTX and its customers have failed to “justify such secrecy.”

The Ad Hoc Committee of Non-US Customers of FTX.com claimed in a Dec. 28 filing that publicly revealing the names and private information of non-U.S. customers leaves them vulnerable to identity theft, targeted attacks, and “other injury.”

In the recent filing, the media outlets argued that if the “permanent sealing” of the users were permissible on the grounds claimed by FTX and the Committee “then sealing customers’ names would be routine in virtually every bankruptcy proceeding.”

Related: FTX EU launches withdrawal website to pay back European users

They added that “public access is of the utmost importance here,” as the magnitude of the FTX collapse has “ignited intense public interest in the U.S. legal system’s approach to the burgeoning and largely unregulated cryptocurrency market,” and added:

“The sealing of the names of FTX’s creditors to date has significantly impeded reporting on, and analysis of, these proceedings, leaving the public—and creditors— largely in the dark as to the United States’ enforcement of its bankruptcy laws in the crypto context”

In response to the Committee’s Dec. 28 filing, Judge John Dorsey allowed the names and addresses of the customers to be redacted for a further three months on Jan. 11, noting that he “remained reluctant at this point” to disclose the confidential information which may put creditors “at risk.”

Crypto lending platform Celsius had similarly tried to ensure that its customers' names remained redacted during its bankruptcy proceedings but failed to convince the judge, resulting in the personal details of thousands of customers being disclosed on Oct. 5, 2022.

A hearing on the matter is set to occur on April 12 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time.

NFT Creator, Sarah Zucker: The Sarah Show’s analog past meets dizzying digital future

Analyst Unveils Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Targets, Says Incoming Altcoin Opportunities Will Be ‘Insane’

Stanford Alumni Revealed as Co-Signers of FTX Co-Founder’s $250M Bond

Stanford Alumni Revealed as Co-Signers of FTX Co-Founder’s 0M BondAccording to the latest court documents in the fraud case involving former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried in Manhattan, the New York judge presiding over the case unsealed the co-signers of Bankman-Fried’s bond on Wednesday. The names of the two bail bond co-signers that were previously redacted from court documents are Stanford University alumni Larry Kramer […]

Analyst Unveils Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Targets, Says Incoming Altcoin Opportunities Will Be ‘Insane’

FTX customers want more info on FTX’s plans to sell subsidiaries

While the group of 18 customers does not want to prevent the sales from occurring, it argued it needs to be involved to ensure that customers’ interests are represented.

A group of FTX customers has filed a limited objection to FTX’s plan to sell four independently operated subsidiaries, arguing that they should be privy to the sales process to ensure thcustomer interests are represented. 

The group has also shared concerns that “misappropriated customer funds” may have been used to acquire or keep these firms running.

The limited objection was filed on Dec. 4 by an ad hoc committee of non-U.S. customers, which comprises 18 members who collectively have claims against FTX in excess of $1.9 billion.

In its filing, the committee argued that previous public statements by FTX, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission make clear that the customer assets on the platform belong to customers and not FTX.

It said there were “significant concerns over the lack of information regarding sale of the businesses,” and also questioned whether the businesses may be “necessary to a potential restart” of FTX.

A limited objection is similar to an objection except it only applies to a specific part of the proceedings. In this instance, the limited objection is due to the exclusion of the ad hoc committee from the sale process.

The committee has asked the judge to allow them to serve as “consulting professionals” so that they can ensure customers’ interests are represented throughout the bidding process, adding:

“The Ad Hoc Committee does not seek to stand in the way of value-maximizing transactions that the Debtors may pursue, so long as the interests of FTX.com customers are protected.”

Under the proposed bid procedures, only consulting professionals will be able to attend the auction and consult with FTX on matters relating to the sale process, and the committee notes that the consultation parties have no control of the process outside of being able to provide counsel.

Related: US authorities are seizing $460M in Robinhood shares tied to FTX: Report

On Dec. 15, FTX had asked the bankruptcy court to allow them to sell off its European and Japanese branches, in addition to derivatives exchange LedgerX and stock-clearing platform Embed.

LedgerX in particular has been hailed as a success story during the bankruptcy proceedings, with Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Rostin Behnam noting that the firm had essentially been “walled off” from other companies within FTX Group, and “held more cash than all the other FTX debtor entities combined.”

Last week, the same committee asked for customers' names and private information to be redacted from court documents, suggesting that customers could be exposed to identify theft, targeted attack and “other injury.”

Analyst Unveils Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Targets, Says Incoming Altcoin Opportunities Will Be ‘Insane’

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Pleads Not Guilty to Criminal Charges, Bond Signees’ Names Remain Sealed 

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Pleads Not Guilty to Criminal Charges, Bond Signees’ Names Remain Sealed On Jan. 3, 2023, the former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) pleaded not guilty to eight criminal charges that involve two counts of wire fraud and six counts of conspiracy. In addition to the not guilty plea, SBF’s judge Lewis Kaplan granted the defendant’s request to keep the names of his $250 million bond signees […]

Analyst Unveils Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Targets, Says Incoming Altcoin Opportunities Will Be ‘Insane’