Mt Gox Funds Arrive at Kraken: Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash Distributions Expected Soon

July 16, 2024 Bitcoin.com

Mt. Gox Trustee Says Some Creditors Have Received Compensation in Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, Urges Others To Wait

July 5, 2024 The Daily Hodl

Mt Gox Trustee Transfers $2.7B in Bitcoin, Creating 19th Largest BTC Wallet

July 5, 2024 Bitcoin.com

Bitcoin derivatives turn bearish as traders anticipate sub $60K BTC price

June 24, 2024 Coin Telegraph

Bitcoin derivatives turn bearish as traders anticipate sub K BTC price

AMD

Bitcoin derivatives data suggests that macroeconomic and crypto-specific factors are behind BTC’s recent drop below $60,000.

Bitcoin (BTC) price dropped 5.8% between June 23 and June 24, reaching its lowest level in seven weeks at $59,700. Despite a modest recovery to $60,400, a total of $153 million in leveraged long BTC futures was forcefully liquidated due to insufficient margin. This movement caused derivatives metrics to shift to a neutral sentiment, ending a bullish trend that had lasted five weeks.

Traders are now questioning whether the worsening crypto market conditions indicate a longer bear market or a momentary panic due to miners being forced to cover expenses amid lower profitability and the potential sale of large stashes by known entities. Should traders wait for a dip to $57,500 or increase their positions during this period of fear, uncertainty, and doubt?

Some analysts raised concerns after the failed exchange Mt. Gox bankruptcy estate announced the imminent repayment in Bitcoin. Anonymous influencer fejau stressed that the disbursement announcement could have been anticipated by insiders, which explains the recent price weakness. However, fejau is puzzled by Bitcoin’s performance given the constructive macroeconomic scenario.

Deadline Approaching: Mt Gox Trustee Sets Final Cut-off Date for Creditors to Claim Over $3 Billion in Recovered Bitcoin

March 9, 2023 Bitcoin.com

Voyager victim calls for trustee to seize control of the estate

February 2, 2023 Coin Telegraph

3AC

The 120-page motion came from a creditor who asked for the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee citing alleged fraud and incompetence at Voyager.

A Voyager creditor and finance lawyer wants to see a chapter 11 trustee appointed in crypto brokerage Voyager Digital’s bankruptcy trial, which would see Voyager lose control of its estate.

In a Feb. 1 motion, Voyager creditor Michelle DiVita accused Voyager of having a “history of financial statement inaccuracies and public misrepresentations that were known, or reasonably discoverable, at the beginning of the bankruptcy proceeding."

Due to this pre-bankruptcy conduct, DiVita believes that an examiner or trustee should have been requested, and is now doing so herself.

The filing alleges that Voyager “concealed the true nature of its lending activities by publishing financial reports that materially understated its loan positions by more than $1 billion USD.”

@investvoyager loans disclosed on March 31 financial report: $2.2B.

Actual loans on April 3: $3.1B

$1.1B concealed in one business day.

Releases are unconscionable @VoyagerUCC @DOJCrimDiv #VGX pic.twitter.com/dP8g9yvY48
— Michelle DiVita (@ChelleDiVita) January 13, 2023

A former director and CIO for Voyager, Shigo Lavine, highlighted some of the key accusations made in the filing in a lengthy Feb. 1 twitter thread.

For example, Voyager allegedly underreported a loan to crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital by $609 million and also undervalued Bitcoin (BTC) in its financial reports by 546% to downplay the size of its loans.

The Debtor provided assurances in regards to its ability to raise capital and meet liquidity requirements.

This led many (including myself) to incorrectly conclude that Voyager would be able to survive this despite 3AC going under pic.twitter.com/jjnloWDG7A
— Shingo Lavine (@shingolavine) February 1, 2023

According to the filing, crypto exchange Coinbase also caught wind of Voyager’s “financial reporting inconsistencies,” and had reportedly backed out of a potential deal to acquire the assets of Voyager after finding “the financials don’t add up.”

The bankruptcy proceedings already involve a United States Trustee, who is required to bring a motion to appoint a chapter 11 trustee when there are “reasonable grounds to suspect” that the debtor “participated in actual fraud, dishonesty or criminal conduct.”

While the U.S. Trustee appoints a creditors committee and reviews applications for the recompensation of professionals amongst other duties, they may also hire a bankruptcy trustee to manage the debtor’s affairs if the debtors are not allowed to do so themselves.

Cointelegraph has contacted Voyager for a response to the allegations and the motion but did not receive an immediate response.

In other news, both Voyager and its creditors have pushed back at an attempt by bankrupt trading firm Alameda Research to claw back $446 million in loan repayments.

After commencing chapter 11 proceedings on Jul. 5, Voyager had demanded the repayment of all its outstanding loans to Alameda, and was repaid in full.

However, Alameda sought to recover the funds in a Jan. 30 court filing, arguing that because they repaid the loans within 90 days of filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy themselves, they could “claw back” these funds for the benefit of Alameda creditors.

Voyager says that its creditors have suffered “substantial harm” due to Alameda making a bid for Voyager’s assets that it could not honor, costing them in excess of $100 million. Voyager argues that this makes Alameda’s claim subordinate to those of its other creditors.

FTX lawyers: Examiner could cost $100M and ‘provide no benefit’

January 26, 2023 Coin Telegraph

FTX lawyers: Examiner could cost 0M and ‘provide no benefit’

bahamas

FTX lawyers, joint provisional liquidators of FTX.US and the Bahamas and a committee of creditors have all opposed the appointment of an independent examiner.

An investigation into FTX’s collapse by an examiner could cost the firm upwards of $100 million without providing any benefit to creditors or equity holders, argues lawyers representing the bankrupt crypto exchange.

The arguments were part of a Jan. 25 objection to a motion from the United States Trustee in December, which called for the judge to appoint an independent examiner to ensure any investigations are transparent and their findings made public.

This will be fascinating.

4 Senators submitted a letter asking for an Independent Examiner. Will they do more?

Several States have entered the FTX case. Will they lend support for an Examiner?

The SEC asked for the Independent Examiner in Enron. Will they say anything here? https://t.co/KiSZKYonCD
— MetaLawMan (@MetaLawMan) January 26, 2023

FTX lawyers argued that creditors would not benefit from an examiner investigation which duplicates investigations led by FTX’s CEO John J. Ray III, a committee of creditors, law enforcement agencies, and congress, adding:

“The appointment of an examiner, with a mandate to be determined, can be expected to cost these estates in the tens of millions of dollars. Indeed, if history is a guide, the cost could near or exceed $100 million.”

The creditors committee, also known as The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, submitted their own objection to the appointment of an independent examiner on Jan. 25, also citing the prohibitive costs involved and the investigations of various parties which are already underway.

In the original motion, the U.S. Trustee had noted if the court was concerned about the duplication of work, it could allow the examiner to access existing work, adding:

“An examiner may also allow for a faster and more cost-effective resolution of these cases by allowing Mr. Ray to focus on his primary duty of stabilizing the Debtors’ businesses while allowing the examiner to conduct the investigation.”

Joint provisional liquidators in the Bahamas and FTX.US also opposed the appointment on Jan. 25, pointing to a section of the bankruptcy code which allows the judge to appoint an examiner “as is appropriate,” and arguing that the unnecessary costs and delays which would accompany the appointment of an examiner renders it “inappropriate.”

The appointment of an independent examiner has been a key topic throughout FTXs bankruptcy trial.

On Dec. 9 a group of four U.S. senators which included Elizabeth Warren wrote an open letter to Judge John Dorsey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, claiming that FTX’s counsel Sullivan & Cromwell had a conflict of interest in the case and cast doubt over their ability to provide findings which inspire confidence.

However, the judge ruled on Jan. 20 that there were no potential conflicts of interest sufficient to stop the law firm from continuing to act as FTX’s counsel.

The judge will decide whether to accept the appointment of an independent examiner in a court hearing on Feb. 6.

Independent examiners are often appointed by bankruptcy courts to investigate details of complex cases brought before them, and have been appointed in other high-profile bankruptcy cases such as Lehman Brothers during the subprime mortgage crisis and the crypto exchange Celsius.

Celsius Floats Possibility of Debt Token to Repay Creditors; Secures Court Approval to Process Customer Withdrawals

January 25, 2023 Bitcoin.com

FTX’s $5.5 Billion in Alleged ‘Liquid Assets’ Includes Locked SOL Cache and Illiquid FTT Holdings

January 19, 2023 Bitcoin.com

FTX CEO fights to keep lawyers as calls for removal intensify

January 19, 2023 Coin Telegraph

Apollo

Numerous parties have objected to the retention of Sullivan & Cromwell as lead counsel to FTX, citing conflicts of interest and insufficient disclosures.

The CEO of crypto exchange FTX has rejected calls for its law firm Sullivan & Cromwell to be replaced as lead counsel in its bankruptcy case.

John J. Ray III, who was appointed as the new FTX CEO on Nov. 11, filed a court motion on Jan. 17, arguing that Sullivan & Cromwell has been integral in taking control over the “dumpster fire” that was handed to him.

Ray suggested that retaining their services is in the best interest of FTX creditors, arguing:

“The advisors are not the villains in these cases. The villains are being pursued by the appropriate criminal authorities largely as a result of the information and support they are receiving at my direction from the Debtors’ advisors.”

The U.S. Trustee, Andrew R. Vara, had filed an objection to the retention of the law firm on Jan. 14, citing two separate issues.

He claimed that Sullivan & Cromwell had failed to sufficiently disclose its connections and prior work for FTX. He also pointed out that based on publicly-available knowledge, a former partner of the law firm became a counsel to FTX 14 months prior to the bankruptcy filing.

Meanwhile, lawyer James A. Murphy, who goes by the Twitter handle MetaLawMan, suggested on Jan. 14 that the prior work it had done for FTX was not the law firm's only conflict of interest in the case.

At the same time that Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers have had unrestricted access to all internal data about the value of FTX's assets and liabilities...

Apollo Global has (reportedly) been quietly offering to buy up creditor claims from FTX customers for pennies on the dollar.
— MetaLawMan (@MetaLawMan) January 13, 2023

He claimed that private equity firm Apollo Global has been buying up creditor claims from FTX customers for a fraction of their worth. Murphy notes that Apollo’s Chairman of the Board, Jay Clayton, is also employed by Sullivan & Cromwell, which has access to sensitive financial information.

The U.S. Trustee also believed that the current application to retain Sullivan & Cromwell was flawed, as they would “usurp” an independent examiner’s work and the parties would be duplicating their services at the expense of the FTX estate.

The Trustee had first called for the appointment of an independent examiner on Dec. 1, pointing to a part of the bankruptcy code which mandates the appointment of an examiner when certain debts exceed $5 million.

On Jan. 10, a bipartisan group of four U.S. representatives sent a letter to Delaware bankruptcy judge John Dorsey, requesting he approves the motion to hire an independent examiner and expressed their disbelief that the law firm could be labeled as a “disinterested” party.

Dorsey however labeled the letter as “inappropriate ex parte communication,” and said he would not take it into account when he decides whether to appoint an independent examiner or approve the retention of Sullivan & Cromwell.

Dorsey however is set to consider the objection of an FTX creditor filed on Jan. 10 when deciding whether Sullivan & Cromwell should be retained, with the creditor also suggesting that the law firm's previous work for FTX constitutes a conflict of interest.

trustee

Share this video