1. Home
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals

U.S. Court of Appeals

DC Circuit Court Rules Kalshi’s US Election Bets Legal

DC Circuit Court Rules Kalshi’s US Election Bets LegalThis week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled in favor of the predictions market Kalshi, allowing the commodities exchange to offer event contracts based on the outcome of U.S. congressional elections. Circuit Judge Millett’s opinion supports the legality of the contracts, dismissing claims of gaming or election gambling. […]

Bitcoin Supply Shock: Cryptoquant Report Highlights Shrinking Sell-Side Liquidity

Bitcoin ETFs have 75% chance of approval this year: Bloomberg analysts

Bloomberg ETF analysts raised their odds for a spot Bitcoin ETF approval after the recent Grayscale victory against the SEC.

Bloomberg analysts have raised the probability for an approved spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) by the end of 2023, following a recent Grayscale victory against the federal securities regulator.

In a Aug. 30 post on X (Twitter), Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said they have raised the chances to 75% from an earlier 65% — due to the unanimity and decisiveness at which the United States Court of Appeals Circuit reached its decision in the recent case.

“The judges unanimously repudiated the SEC’s arguments, and the agency will struggle to justify further denials as it faces deadlines,” Bloomberg analysts James Seyffart and Elliot Stein added in a separate Aug. 30 note.

In his own post on X, Seyffart added that spot Bitcoin ETF approvals will likely be a “done deal” by Q4 2024, estimating the approval odds to have now skyrocketed to 95% by then.

Balchunas added that given the recent legal and public relations loss, a denial by the SEC will be “politically untennable.”

Related: Grayscale wins the court battle, but what does this mean for a spot Bitcoin ETF?

Over the next five days, seven Bitcoin spot ETF applications are due for a “first deadline” decision by the SEC, including Bitwise, BlackRock, VanEck, Fidelity, Invesco, Wisdomtree and Valkyrie.

Balchunas said he “wouldn’t be surprised” if the SEC delays these upcoming Bitcoin spot ETF applications.

But the most likely outcome will be that we unexpectedly wake up to the SEC giving in and approving the Bitcoin spot ETFs in one hit, he said.

Magazine: Hall of Flame: Wolf Of All Streets worries about a world where Bitcoin hits $1M

Bitcoin Supply Shock: Cryptoquant Report Highlights Shrinking Sell-Side Liquidity

Grayscale fires first salvo in case against SEC over Bitcoin ETF refusal

The SEC must submit its brief by Nov. 9. After that, Grayscale will then submit a reply brief on Nov. 30 before both parties submit a final brief on Dec. 21.

Digital asset manager Grayscale has filed its opening brief against the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) to challenge its decision denying Grayscale’s application to convert the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) to a spot Bitcoin ETF.

The world’s largest digital asset management firm filed its opening legal brief on Oct. 11 in the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia Circuit, in which it claimed the SEC’s knockback to be “arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory.”

Grayscale argued that the SEC treats spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) with “special harshness” and is doing so “in excess of its statutory authority.”

Attorneys for Grayscale argued that several Bitcoin Futures ETFs that have been previously approved by the SEC generate their prices based on the same indices as the spot Bitcoin ETF.

They stated that the SEC could not rationally conclude that Bitcoin Futures ETFs do not take on “the very same risks in the very same market” as the spot Bitcoin ETF, adding:

“Although Bitcoin may be a relatively new asset, the legal issue here is straightforward. The Commission has violated the APA’s most basic requirements by failing to justify its vastly different treatment of Bitcoin Futures ETPs and spot Bitcoin ETPs.”

Grayscale also argued that the SEC’s “significant-market test” — one which assesses whether an exchange’s proposal to list an ETP is “designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices” – is “flawed” and that the SEC “set the bar so high” that it couldn’t possibly be satisfied.

Attorneys for Grayscale also noted that this significant-market test only applies to Bitcoin-related ETPs — which led them to believe that they have been discriminated against.

Grayscale also argued the SEC’s decision “harms the 850,000 investors who own shares in the Trust”:

“Given that the Commission did not approve the Trust to trade as an ETP on the Exchange, the value of its shares cannot closely track the value of the Trust’s underlying Bitcoin assets— depriving Trust shareholders of billions of dollars in value.“

“There is simply no justification for continuing to inflict such serious investor harm,” the brief stated.

Related: Grayscale legal officer says Bitcoin ETF litigation could take two years

The filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals comes after the SEC officially denied Grayscale’s application to convert GBTC to a spot Bitcoin ETF on Jun. 29.

On the same day, Grayscale initiated litigation by filing a “Petition For Review.”

According to Grayscale, the SEC must submit its brief by Nov. 9. Grayscale will then submit a reply brief on Nov. 30 before both parties submit a final brief on Dec. 21.

Grayscale had $26.4 billion in assets under management (AUM) in Mar. 2022.

Bitcoin Supply Shock: Cryptoquant Report Highlights Shrinking Sell-Side Liquidity