1. Home
  2. Artists

Artists

Arthur Hayes reveals philosophy behind ‘Airheads’ Ordinals collection

Users can choose to complete quest-like directives to receive Airheads or outright purchase the inscribed art through a “Whale Pass.”

Crypto entrepreneur and investor Arthur Hayes recently revealed the details and philosophy behind his new “Airheads” Ordinals, a collection of 10,000 unique cartoonish characters that are balloon-like in appearance and live on the Bitcoin network.

In an article published on his Medium page, Hayes began by explaining that the consumption of art is what gives life its true meaning. He then gave several examples of activities the human race engages in purely for enjoyment and the entertainment of others, such as dance, culinary arts, music and sports:

The entrepreneur then shifted his focus to the core philosophical message behind the Airheads Ordinals collection, explaining that the balloon-like characters represent an indictment against the inflationary policies of the elite class and centralized governments. Each Airhead is “metaphorically filled with the inflation of our day,” said Hayes.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

NFTs and blockchain bridge Ethiopia’s past and present in new art exhibition

“Ethiopia at the Crossroads” is getting a special blockchain boost for its final stint at the Toledo Museum of Art as part of the Ethiopian family art collective’s residency with the museum.

America’s first major institutional exhibition of Ethiopian art throughout the ages will conclude its year-long tour at the Toledo Museum of Art (TMA) with a grand finale featuring non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

In June, TMA announced that the blockchain-based Ethiopian art collective Yatreda will be their second digital artist in residence, following the Nigerian-based non-fungible token (NFT) star Osinachi’s residency in 2023.

This year, Yatreda will stage a special installation within TMA’s iteration of “Ethiopia at the Crossroads,” which TMA co-curated with the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore and the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

Artists aim to thwart AI with data-poisoning software and legal action

With AI-generated content continuing to evolve, the advent of data-poisoning tools capable of shielding an artist’s works from AI could be a game changer.

As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated the creative media space — especially art and design — the definition of intellectual property (IP) seems to be evolving in real time as it becomes increasingly difficult to understand what constitutes plagiarism.

Over the past year, AI-driven art platforms have pushed the limits of IP rights by utilizing extensive data sets for training, often without the explicit permission of the artists who crafted the original works.

For instance, platforms like OpenAI’s DALL-E and Midjourney’s service offer subscription models, indirectly monetizing the copyrighted material that constitutes their training data sets.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

Thrash-metal band Megadeth launches NFT collection and metaverse community

The American thrash-metal band Megadeth released a new NFT collection aiming to connect with its community in both physical and digital reality.

Legendary American thrash metal band Megadeth announced a new nonfungible token (NFT) collection on Dec. 5, allowing fans exclusive access to content and physical experiences. 

The band announced the NFTs on social media through a post on X, formerly Twitter, saying the 5000-piece collection features the band’s digital mascot, ​​Vic Rattlehead.

Related: Grimes’ collaboration with music platform makes 200+ AI songs available for creators

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

Michael Jackson’s first-ever studio demo to be released on blockchain

Over five decades after Michael Jackson recorded a demo version of the song “Big Boy,” it’s set to be released globally on the blockchain as digital vinyl through the blockchain music platform Anotherblock.

In a historic move, the first-ever studio recording of a young Michael Jackson, kept under wraps for over five decades, will be released on Dec.

The track, titled “Big Boy (One-Derful Version),” will be digitally published through the blockchain music platform Anotherblock and accessible through the platform’s player alongside images of the master tape and song stems.

Michael Jackson's “Big Boy (One-Derful Version),” NFT Limited Edition version. Source: Anotherblock

Dating back to July 13, 1967, the recording captures eight-year-old Michael Jackson, along with his brothers, in their inaugural studio session at One-Derful in Chicago.

The release is the result of a collaboration between Recordpool, the owner of the recording, and the Swedish blockchain-based music and royalty marketplace, Anotherblock.

The “digital vinyl” revolution

Anotherblock has already worked with other major artists like Rihanna, The Weeknd and Justin Bieber.

“Doing this drop as a digital vinyl on-chain makes it possible to build stories and community around the song and elevate it beyond being just a commodity.”

“Some songs, and this one in particular, deserve a special home where they won’t disappear in the sea of hundreds of thousands of tracks released every day,” he said.

Related: Champ Medici talks Web3 communities, NFTs, music and gaming

He said he’s excited about the release and sees it as a continuation to “shake things up in the digital ownership scene of the music industry.”

Michael Jackson’s original demo of “Big Boy.” Source: Anotherblock

Katherine Jackson, Michael’s mother, expressed her excitement about the release and is quoted as saying, the “recordings of our musical heritage find a new rhythm for the digital age.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

How generative AI allows one architect to reimagine ancient cities

Cointelegraph spoke with architect and designer Tina Marinaki about her work using generative AI and text-to-image prompts to reimagine the ancient Athenian cityscape.

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has presented modern society with new means for understanding and visualizing the world.

Meta, the parent company of social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, recently introduced new AI video and image-generating tools for creators, while OpenAI updated the premium version of its popular AI model ChatGPT to include powerful text-to-image generating capabilities. 

As the pace of AI development continues to accelerate rapidly, many artists are faced with the challenge of embracing the new tools as a part of their workflow while still managing to keep their unique vision. 

One such artist is the New York-based Greek architect Tina Marinaki, who has incorporated AI tools into her creative work and, in the process, created an online community of nearly 20,000 users on Instagram through “Athens Surreal,” which follows her reimagination of the ancient Athenian cityscape.

Cointelegraph spoke with Marinaki about incorporating AI into her work and how she reenvisions her home city using emerging technology.

She explained that the concept of Athens Surreal stemmed from the desire to understand “the way the different AI tools work” while testing ideas for a “different, sometimes romantic, sometimes utopian, futuristic Athens.”

Technical difficulties 

According to Marinaki, one of the primary difficulties working with text-to-image AI systems is “translating” an image description to communicate a vision with the AI systems.

“Other challenges are found in algorithmic ethnicity, gender or other biases when algorithms are trained using biased data.”

For example, she reported that a greater number of men can appear in AI-generated images even when a user’s parameters have no mention of gender, and in some cases, AI can create “racist or stereotypical images.”

Despite its biases in text-to-image generation, these weaknesses can lead to strengths if trained correctly.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

Evidence mounts as new artists jump on Stability AI, MidJourney copyright lawsuit

The battle continues as artists amend a lawsuit previously struck down by court authorities against major AI companies who have allegedly violated creative copyright laws.

A copyright lawsuit filed against multiple companies developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools has been amended as artists and their legal teams alleged the misuse of their creative works. 

On Nov.

The new artists include H.

According to the amended class action case Stability AI, Midjourney and DeviantArt, along with a new defendant, Runway AI, have produced systems that create art in the style of the artists when the artists' names are used as prompts fed to the AI.

The plaintiffs claim that, as a result, users have generated art that is “indistinguishable” from their own.

"AI image products are primarily valued as copyright-laundering devices, promising customers the benefits of art without the costs of artists."

Related: Artists face a choice with AI: Adapt or become obsolete

In addition, the artists allege that Midjourney - one of the most popular generative AI tools for creating art with roughly 16.4 million users, according to its website - has violated rights that fall under federal trademark laws in the United States.

The claims point to MidJourney's website promoting a list of over 4,700 artists’ names, which includes some of the plaintiffs’, to use as generative prompts.

Read more

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

New York MoMA now has tokenized artworks in its permanent collection

The museum’s acquisition of two NFTs marked its first on-chain and AI holdings.

Generative art is proving Web3’s creative anchor in the traditional art world. Last month, New York’s Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) made headlines by acquiring Refik Anadol’s “Unsupervised — Machine Hallucinations” (2022) alongside an edition from last year’s “3FACE” project by Ian Cheng. These two mark the first-ever artificial intelligence (AI) and nonfungible token (NFT) additions to MoMA’s collection, already home to relics such as Andy Warhol’s soup cans and Vincent Van Gogh’s “Starry Night.”

The landmark acquisitions also supplement MoMA’s longtime legacy of pioneering exhibitions at the intersection of technology and art, from its 1968 show “The Machine as Seen at the End of the Mechanical Age” through this year’s “Signals: How Video Transformed the World.”

MoMA’s announcement arrived in tandem with an outline of the institution’s digital art programming for the fall and winter seasons ahead, including the debut of video artist Leslie Thornton’s latest work, “HANDMADE” (2023), and an online exhibition with Feral File opening early next year. Weeks before, MoMA had announced its on-chain Postcard project, too.

Sample data visualization, Unsupervised — Machine Hallucinations. Source: MoMA

“These new initiatives underscore MoMA’s longstanding commitment to support artists who experiment with emerging technologies to expand their visual vocabularies and creative exploration, increase the impact of their work and help us understand and navigate transformative change in the world,” the Museum’s release around their acquisitions states.

“I’m very proud to be included,” Cheng told Cointelegraph. “MoMA had previously acquired my ‘Emissaries’ trilogy of simulations in 2017. Their openness and enthusiasm for acquiring dynamic digital art is rare for an institution.”

Unsupervised

It’s the screensaver heard around the world. Whether you’re enamored or suspicious of this one-time Google artist-in-residence’s prolific and mesmerizing machine-learning abstractions, the odds are you’ve seen them. Anadol designed this one in particular with help from Nvidia. It feeds 138,151 pieces of visual metadata from MoMA’s collection to an algorithm that produces an AI imagination of art history through Anadol’s signature undulations.

Since its release in November 2022, “Unsupervised” has been reviewed by critics at Vulture, Artforum and more. The time it took to write those reviews says more than anything about the work’s import. Jerry Saltz’s half-baked hot takes don’t detract from the mental energy his writing requires. Haters alone haven’t made Anadol famous — he has scores of devoted fans if not collectors. MoMA opted to extend the work’s 24-foot tall display several times. It just came down on Oct. 29, but visitors who minted their proof-of-attendance protocol, or POAP, from the posted QR code still have a piece of the spectacle.

Sample data visualization, Unsupervised — Machine Hallucinations. Source: MoMA

Noted NFT collector and founder of the club 1 OF 1 Ryan Zurrer made the work’s acquisition possible, along with the “RFC Collection,” led by Pablo Rodriguez-Fraile and Desiree Casoni.

“I tip my hat to the folks at MoMA for understanding the cultural zeitgeist of the moment,” Zurrer told ARTnews. “Unsupervised went up two weeks before ChatGPT went public. AI is the defining topic of the moment, and MoMA captured that. I’m excited to donate this work to MoMA. But I need to acknowledge that this isn’t just a donation from me and [collector] Pablo Rodriguez-Fraile, but from Refik. He is bringing the servers and screens and the other components. The NFT is one part of this conceptual artwork that belongs to MoMA now.”

Magazine: I spent a week working in VR. It was mostly terrible, however…

While the Museum couldn’t clarify whether Anadol outright donated the hardware that enabled “Unsupervised” to go on view, we can assume that’s the case. Their release said Thornton’s “HANDMADE” will go on view in the same Gund Lobby where they displayed “Unsupervised” on a screen the very same size, “designed by and realized with thanks to Refik Anadol Studio.”

3FACE

Meanwhile, Cheng evades branding. A lifelong exploration of psychology through cutting-edge technologies defines his practice more than any single aesthetic. In fact, there are 4,096 unique editions of “3FACE” in existence, and not one of them was designed explicitly by Cheng’s hand. Works in the generative project depict adaptive, ongoing visual portraits of their owners, crafted using data gleaned from their wallets at any given moment. MoMA calls it his “most ambitious experimental artwork to date to explore blockchain technologies and the decentralization of data,” which expands upon “the artist’s interest in the capacity of humans to relate to change.”

In his efforts to represent and shape the ephemeral mind, Cheng told Right Click Save last year he believes “art can play a role in upgrading the unconscious response we have to complexity.” “3FACE” honors the depths of every person — and, because it’s dynamic, their ability to change.

Image from 3FACE. Source: MoMA

The NFT platform Outland Art donated its “3FACE” to MoMA’s collection. “Jason Li and Chris Lew advised a lot and helped flesh out the team to turn the idea into a reality,” Cheng told Cointelegraph. “I would not have made ‘3FACE’ without Outland.”

The work’s public entry on MoMA’s website doesn’t list what number out of the whole series it is or what wallet it belongs to. MoMA didn’t respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment, but based on the way “3FACE” works and the fact that MoMA just started collecting on-chain artworks, this might be the “3FACE” interpretation of a wide open wallet populated only by Anadol’s “Unsupervised.”

Another chapter in art history

Carrying the torch from former contentious and pioneering art forms like photography, generative art has forced this generation of artists to reassess what exactly makes art valuable.

“The endgame of generative AI tooling is a new immediacy between thought and visual articulation,” Cheng mused about what’s next for AI art. “We’re used to the immediacy between thought and written or verbal expression. A writer, with no intermediary help, can construct a novel. Imagine if you, with no intermediary help, could construct a movie. As with writing fiction, the filmmaker is capped only by their own imagination, their taste, the quality of their questions, their courage to pursue gray truths, and their understanding of human behavior.”

Technology will continually evolve, but it’s the evolution of artists’ abilities in using it that divides what’s merely eye-catching from what’s impactful. Not that those two are mutually exclusive — even though MoMA’s Anadol acquisition is akin to the institution buying itself a Louis Vuitton bag, what society calls luxury is history on its own.

Recent: No CZ, no problem: Binance Blockchain Week showcases Turkish crypto industry

Anadol and Cheng both work predominantly with data while making AI art. The emergent properties of their processes have implications. “Unsupervised” begs the question: What is art history? — a fraught topic traditional art historians argue over without even breaching painting alone. By virtue of its premise, “3FACE” asks those who engage with it how they’d quantify a gnarled human psyche. It’s one of the few projects that uses the ledger as anything more than a manner of transacting.

Museums such as the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Centre Pompidou started collecting NFTs back in the boom days. MoMA’s decision to lend credence to such works now marks a new watershed moment.

“We pinch our nose at ‘AI art’ right now because the first experiments look like experiments, but zoom out 10 years from now,” Cheng said. “The ease of producing visually refined expression will unlock a lot of artistic agency from a greater plurality of people, and this is a good thing.”

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

YouTube says creators must disclose gen AI use or face suspension

YouTube’s updated community guidelines include new disclosure requirements for AI-generated content, its new standards for “sensitive topics,” and the removal of deep fakes.

YouTube, the video streaming social platform, released new community guidelines relating to the disclosure of artificial intelligence (AI) used in content. 

The platform published a blog on Nov. 14 saying that the updates will have creators on its platform inform their viewers if the content that is being shown is “synthetic.”

“We’ll require creators to disclose when they've created altered or synthetic content that is realistic, including using AI tools.”

An example given in the update was an ai-generated video that “realistically depicts” something that never happened or content of a person saying or doing something that they did not.

This information will be displayed for viewers in two ways, according to YouTube, with the first being a new label added to the description panel and if the content is about “sensitive topics” a more prominent label to the video player.

Sensitive topics according to YouTube include political elections, “ongoing conflicts,” public health crisis and public officials. 

YouTube says it will work with creators to help its community better understand the new guidelines, however it said for anyone who does not abide by the rules their content is subject to removal, “suspension from the YouTube Partner Program, or other penalties.”

Related: Google sues scammers over creation of fake Bard AI chatbot

The platform also touched on the topic of AI-generated deep fakes, which have become both increasingly common and realistic. It said they’re integrating a new feature that will allow users to request the removal of a synthetic video that “simulates an identifiable individual, including their face or voice, using our privacy request process.”

Recently, multiple celebrities and public figures such as Tom Hanks, Mr. Beast, Gayle King, Jennifer Aniston and more have battled with deep fake videos of themselves endorsing products.

AI-generated content has also been a thorn in the side of the music industry over the last year, as many deep fakes of artists using illegal vocal or track samples have also plagued the internet.

In its updated community guidelines YouTube says it will also remove AI-generated music or content that mimics an artist’s unique singing or rapping voice as requested by its “music partners.”

Over the summer YouTube began working on its principles for working with the music industry on AI technology. Alongside the community guidelines, YouTube recently released new experimental AI chatbots that chat with viewers while watching a video.

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension

SAG-AFTRA strike ends as AI deal reached, Hollywood still torn

The 118-day Hollywood actors’ union strike came to an end with an agreement on AI usage, though not everyone in the industry sees it as the right move.

The Hollywood actors’ union SAG-AFTRA concluded its strike on Nov. 9 after 118 days of picketing with new deals on various proposed stipulations including artificial intelligence (AI) usage. 

Since then, the union has released a summary of its final deal with studios, which included nearly 4.5 pages of AI guidelines and a digital pamphlet spelling out the agreed-upon AI regulations for the industry.

SAG-AFTRA AI guideline digital pamphlet. Source: SAG-AFTRA

The AI agreement is expected to come into effect 90 days after the ratification of the agreement. Its terms include defining AI in industry terms, the digital replication of performers and background actors, digital alterations and the establishment of semi-annual meetings between the union and producers over generative AI use.

According to a report from Rolling Stone, the contract was approved by 86% of the board of Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists and is going to union voters on Nov. 12 with a 21-day voting period.

A new type of digital asset

The deal defines and establishes coverage for the creation, use and alteration of “digital replicas” of performers. These digital replicas are copies of the voice or likeness of a performer for “portraying the performer in photography or soundtrack in which the performer did not actually perform.” 

These “digital replicas” are categorized by those made in employment with studios and those made independently. Compensation for the latter will be bargained by the actors themselves, however for those employed directly from studios, compensation will be for the creation and use of their AI replicas and its use in any additional projects or other mediums - plus normal residuals.

It also laid out a definition for a new type of actor called a “synthetic performer.” Under the terms of the agreement, this is a “digitally-created asset” that “is intended to create, and does create, the clear impression that the asset is a natural performer who is not recognizable as any identifiable natural performer.”

When it comes to the replication of background actors, the agreement seems to shield them from potential replacement saying that:

“Replicas must not be used to meet the background counts for the day. Replicas will not be used to avoid the engagement of background actors.”

The agreement stresses that explicit and “conspicuous” consent from the actor, either principal or background, is needed during the replication process, both for its use in the production for which it is made and for any future use.

Related: Hollywood studios offer new proposal for AI and data transparency to curb strike

This also includes consent for digital alterations to the performer’s performance in “previously recorded material unless it remains substantially as scripted, performed and/or recorded” and producers must provide a “reasonably specific description” of the alterations they would like to make. 

For background actors, the agreement said if “lip or facial movements are altered to make it look like a background actor is speaking, and dialogue is added, they will be upgraded to a day performer.”

Mixed reactions from Hollywood

Reactions from industry insiders to the agreement have been mixed, and alternate between praise for the deal and excitement to move forward, and believing more could have been done and fearing for performers. 

Director and producer Justine Bateman expressed her disagreement with the decision on social media. She called the AI permissions “violating” and said she was disappointed in the SAG-AFTRA leadership.

On the other hand, actor Jason Winston George, a negotiating committee member on the deal, took to X (formerly Twitter) to defend the agreement.

“Not only is it unrealistic and impossible to try and hold back the tide when it comes to technology, these new SAG-AFTRA protections actually allow you to surf the wave of AI technology when it comes to the use of your face and likeness.”

He said if a company wants to pay him by a rate he negotiated to use his AI double while he “stays at home—or better yet to work another job,” he’s on board.

However, he also said there may still be “a fight someday against Synthetic Fakes, completely AI-generated characters that don’t look like any individual performer.”

On the side of Bateman, actor Rainn Wilson, famous for his role in the sitcom The Office, mocked the deal, asking what would happen if actors disagree with the deal. Will they be replaced by AI actors?

The end of the SAG-AFTRA strike comes about a month and half after the Writer’s Guild of America (WGA) strike ended on Sept. 24. The WGA strike was also negotiating industry practices, among which AI usage in writer’s rooms was a critical negotiation. 

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Crypto AI Agent Raises $7.5M in Less Than a Day Before Sudden X Suspension