
Despite having no trading experience a Tennessee couple convinced 100 people to hand over their money for a uniquely named crypto investment pool.
A Tennessee husband and wife are facing charges over “Blessings of God Thru Crypto” — an allegedly fraudulent investment scheme that swindled at least $6 million from over 100 victims in just six months.
A July 24 complaint from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said Michael and Amanda Griffis used the connections they made in their real estate business to convince people to fork their savings over to a multi-million dollar investment pool between July 2022 and January 2023.
These included mortgage brokers and former customers of their real estate business, it said.
The CFTC charged husband and wife realtors of Tennessee for operating a $6M digital assets commodity pool scheme. Learn more: https://t.co/pPq9hV8qeU
— CFTC (@CFTC) July 25, 2023
“Despite having no trading or other relevant experience, the defendants successfully convinced over 100 people to send them over $6 million to participate in a commodity pool called ‘Blessings of God Thru Crypto,’” the CFTC said.
As part of the scheme pool participants were told their funds would be used to trade crypto futures contracts, however, not a single trade was ever conducted, said the CFTC.
“The defendants falsely represented that pool funds would be safe and under their control, that pool participants could expect high gains, and that the defendants would use pool funds to trade ‘crypto futures.’”
Instead, around $4 million of the pooled funds were transferred to digital wallets outside of the Griffis’ control and more than $1 million were misappropriated to pay off personal debt and expensive items over a number of months, the CFTC alleged.
This included $10,000 in college tuition for family members, $20,000 for an all-terrain vehicle and $335,000 to pay off credit card debt.
Related: CFTC issues $54M default judgment against trader in crypto fraud scheme
The couple has been charged with defrauding over 100 victims and failing to register with the CFTC.
In its complaint, it requested a permanent injunction against the Griifis and any potential collaborators, preventing them from participating in any future transactions involving commodity interests, along with full restitution to anyone that sustained losses from the scheme, and requested the court impose civil penalties against the Griffis.
The CFTC warned full restitution will likely be difficult given that the alleged wrongdoers will likely have insufficient funds or assets.
According to their respective LinkedIn profiles, Michael and Amanda Griffis are affiliated with Exit Realty Screamin’ Eagle, based in Clarksville, Tennessee. Amanda is listed as a “Broker/Co-Owner,” while Michael is listed as a “Realtor.”
Cointelegraph contacted the Griffis for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
Magazine: How smart people invest in dumb memecoins — 3-point plan for success
Binance, Changpeng Zhao and former compliance chief Samuel Lim intend to file two motions to dismiss a March lawsuit from the CFTC.
Crypto exchange Binance and its CEO Changpeng "CZ" Zhao are planning to file a motion to dismiss a March-filed lawsuit from the United States commodities regulator.
In a July 24 filing to an Illinois District Court, multiple Binance entities, Zhao and former chief compliance officer Samuel Lim said they plan to file two separate motions to dismiss the complaint before July 27.
"The Foreign Binance Entities and Zhao intend to file a joint Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. Lim intends to file a separate Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, and join parts of the motion filed by the Foreign Binance Entities and Zhao," the filing read.
Binance is also seeking permission to exceed a 15-page limit on the brief which would be used to support its motion and requested for it to go up to 50 pages citing the complexity of the lawsuit brought against it.
"Given the complexity of the CFTC’s Complaint and the number of arguments Defendants anticipate making in support of their Motions to Dismiss, Defendants anticipate that their Memoranda of Law in support of the two motions will exceed the fifteen-page limits."
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sued Binance and Zhao in March alleging the crypto exchange did not properly register with the regulator.
The CFTC claimed despite Binance blocking U.S. residents from transacting on its platform, since at least 2019 it knowingly conducted transactions in multiple cryptocurrencies for people based in the U.S. and intentionally violated U.S. laws.
The regulator also called Binance's compliance process a "sham" and alleged it willingly conducted its activities outside of the U.S. and obscured the location of its headquarters with the aim of evading U.S. regulations.
Related: What criminal charges for Celsius ex-CEO mean for crypto industry
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also sued Binance and Zhao on June 5 alleging it sold unregistered securities, allowed U.S. customers to use its global platform and claimed Zhao misused customer funds.
The SEC's complaint claimed Binance's compliance chief in 2018 — believed to be Lim — said in a message to another compliance officer that “we are operating as a fking unlicensed securities exchange in the USA bro”
Binance is also reportedly under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for allowing Russians to use its platform in violation of U.S. sanctions.
Magazine: $3.4B of Bitcoin in a popcorn tin — The Silk Road hacker’s story
The firms were cited anonymously in the CFTC’s complaint describing Binance’s alleged facilitation of U.S. clients.
Trading firms Jane Street Group, Tower Research Capital and Radix Trading have been reportedly identified as Binance’s three “VIP” clients that were anonymously cited in the recent lawsuit filed against Binance by the United States commodities regulator.
According to an April 5 Bloomberg report citing “people familiar with the matter,” Radix Trading is “Trading Firm A” as described in the Commodities Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) suit, while Jane Street was “Trading Firm B” and Tower Research was “Trading Firm C.”
The firms on the CFTC’s list were examples of U.S. clients allegedly able to access Binance.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) first reported on March 28 that Radix Trading was “Trading Firm A.”
Radix co-founder Benjamin Blander told the WSJ in a March 30 report that he believed the firm acted legally even when trading with Binance’s offshore entity.
The claimed “VIP” treatment from Binance included lower transaction fees and faster trading services, the CFTC said in the filing. The firms provided Binance with liquidity on the exchange, and Binance gained the corresponding trading fee revenues.
Today the CFTC charged Binance and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, with willful evasion of federal law and operating an illegal digital asset derivatives exchange. Learn more: https://t.co/DdczFgvW6A
— CFTC (@CFTC) March 27, 2023
It was part of a strategy that “actively facilitated violations of U.S. law” by helping U.S. trading firms evade Know Your Customer compliance standards, among other things, the CFTC alleged.
Binance allegedly enabled Radix to sidestep compliance controls by providing them information on accessing Binance.com through a virtual private network to obscure its IP address.
Related: Dubai regulator demands Binance provide info on ownership, governance: Report
The CFTC claimed the trading violations to have come about as Binance prioritized “commercial success over compliance with U.S. law.”
However, Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao vehemently denied the claims of compliance and market manipulation violations in a follow-up post on March 28.
CZ’s Response to the CFTC Complainthttps://t.co/iIoDR70IT9
— Binance (@binance) March 27, 2023
Magazine: US enforcement agencies are turning up the heat on crypto-related crime
The proposed lawsuit names Alex Mashinsky and a number of former executives and co-founders for alleged “recklessness, gross mismanagement, and self-interested conduct.”
The official committee of Celsius creditors is proposing to sue Celsius co-founder Alex Mashinsky and other executives for "fraud, recklessness, gross mismanagement and self-interested conduct" that eventually led to the collapse of the crypto lender.
In a proposed complaint filed in a New York Bankruptcy Court on Feb. 14, attorneys representing the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors said the move follows six months of investigations into Celsius’ current and former directors, officers and employees.
The committee is made up of seven Celsius account holders and was appointed by the U.S. Trustee in July 2022. The committee represents the interest of Celsius' account holders along with unsecured creditors.
1-In connection with its investigation, the UCC has identified significant claims and causes of action that Celsius has against Alex Mashinsky and other insiders for breaching their fiduciary obligations, fraudulent transfers, and other causes of action.
— Celsius Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (@CelsiusUcc) February 14, 2023
“The Committee’s investigation has uncovered significant claims and causes of action based on fraud, recklessness, gross mismanagement, and self-interested conduct by the Debtors’ former directors and officers,” wrote lawyers from White & Case LLC.
The proposed lawsuit — which seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial — aims to bring claims and causes of action against the following Celsius executives, persons and their associated entities:
“Mr. Mashinsky, Mr. Leon, Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Beaudry, Ms. Urata-Thompson, and Mr. Treutler breached their fiduciary obligations to Celsius,” the lawyers wrote, adding:
“Those parties were aware Celsius was promising its customer's interest payments that it could not afford and did nothing to fix the problem.”
The lawyers have also alleged the executives made “negligent, reckless (and sometimes self-interested) investments” causing Celsius to lose $1 billion in a single year, while mismanagement led to another quarter-of-a-billion dollar loss “because they could not adequately account for the company’s assets and liabilities.”
“After that loss, they did not invest in or develop the company’s systems to adequately fix the issue, resulting in further losses,” they alleged.
The motion also alleges the executives directed Celsius to spend “hundreds of millions of dollars” on public markets to inflate the price of CEL tokens, while they “secretly sold tens of millions of CEL tokens (or were aware of such sales)” for their own benefit.
“They sat idly by as Mr. Mashinsky recklessly bet hundreds of millions of dollars on the movement of the cryptocurrency market. They covered up Mr. Mashinsky’s repeated lies about Celsius’ investments and financial condition.”
Related: Judge denies motions from Celsius users seeking to reclaim assets
“Finally, when it became apparent that Celsius would be required to file for bankruptcy, the Prospective Defendants withdrew assets from the sinking ship [...] while actively encouraging customers to keep their assets on the Celsius platform," the lawyers added.
The Celsius creditors committee said the proposed complaint was just the “first of many steps” in its investigation into potential former Celsius executive wrongdoings and the return of assets to victims.
5-The UCC’s goal, as always, is to maximize recoveries for the benefit of Celsius’ customers and unsecured creditors who were victims of the negligent, reckless, and fraudulent conduct of Mr. Mashinsky and others.
— Celsius Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (@CelsiusUcc) February 14, 2023
A hearing with respect to the proposed complaint will be held on March 8, 2023.
Cointelegraph contacted Celsius for comment but did not receive an immediate response.