1. Home
  2. congress

congress

‘Who the hell’ is Prometheum and what did it say to Congress about SEC compliance?

A testimony given at a United States House of Representatives hearing by the blockchain firm’s co-founder, Aaron Kaplan, has drawn the attention of those in the crypto space.

The relatively under-the-radar crypto company Prometheum has been thrust into the spotlight after a recent testimony from its co-founder before a United States House Committee, discussing crypto regulatory clarity.

On June 13, Prometheum co-founder and co-CEO Aaron Kaplan appeared before the U.S. House at a hearing to discuss providing regulatory clarity to the crypto industry.

Contrary to recent commentary from crypto industry players such as Coinbase, Kaplan’s testimony appears to be supportive of regulating crypto under current securities laws — a view also shared by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Attention was also brought to Kaplan’s testimony on social media, including a widely shared June 14 Twitter thread from Castle Island Ventures partner Matt Walsh, who shared what he claims are “bizarre” facts about the company and its co-founder.

The thread has also prompted many — including Cardano and Ethereum co-founder Charles Hoskinson — to ask just who Kaplan and Prometheum are, and why they appear to be unheard of before.

The Wall Street-based Prometheum was founded in 2017 by Aaron and Benjamin Kaplan, co-CEOs of the firm. The pair are also listed as attorneys at the financial services-focused law firm Gusrae Kaplan.

Subsidiaries of the company are notable for their registrations with the SEC and approvals from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

In May, subsidiary Prometheum Ember Capital was the first firm to offer custody of digital assets as a qualified custodian after receiving FINRA approval to operate as a special purpose broker-dealer for digital assets.

In October 2022, its subsidiary Prometheum Ember ATS launched its SEC-registered alternative trading system offering digital asset trading, clearing, settlement, and custody.

What did Kaplan say?

In his prepared testimony, Kaplan argued that multiple frameworks provided by the SEC have “clearly laid out” a “compliant path forward for crypto in the United States.”

He even provided a glowing review of the regulator, calling it “the most capable financial markets regulatory agency in the world.”

Kaplan claimed crypto exchanges and custodians “are required to be regulated by the SEC” and slammed those not currently regulated as being “reckless, unlawful platforms.”

He went on to say existing securities laws and regulations apply to cryptocurrencies and those who argue for new crypto-specific laws are “simply not willing to comply.” He added new laws are “not in the best interest of the investing public or the blockchain industry.”

Related: Crypto industry ‘destined’ to be BTC-focused due to regulators: Michael Saylor

However, some have criticized the crypto firm, saying Prometheum doesn’t have much to show product-wise despite its years in business and regulator approvals.

During the hearing, Kaplan was asked by Representative Mike Flood if Prometheum offered trading for Bitcoin (BTC) or Ether (ETH), which together make up nearly 65% of the $1 trillion crypto market cap, according to CoinGecko.

Kaplan responded to both questions by saying it did not.

'Bizzare' claims

Meanwhile, theories about the company are are swirling on social media, with some alleging the firm's links to the Chinese Communist Party, pointing to 2019 SEC filings from Prometheum stating HashKey and Shanghai Wanxiang Blockchain are “strategic partners and joint venturers.”

Others have pointed to Prometheum’s team that includes former SEC and FINRA staffers. 

Cointelegraph contacted Prometheum to ask for a comment surrounding some of these claims.

DeFi Dad, Hall of Flame: Ethereum is ‘woefully undervalued’ but growing more powerful

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

US lawmaker invokes SEC lawsuits in considering crypto regulatory framework

According to Rep. Maxine Waters, granting crypto firms provisional registration under a proposed framework "could reward bad actors with a ‘get out of jail free’ card".

Members of the United States House Financial Services Committees met to discuss clarity for the digital asset ecosystem, with some invoking recent legal action from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against crypto firms.

In a June 13 hearing of the committee, ranking member Maxine Waters said Democrats were taking a “serious and thoughtful look” at a proposed framework introduced by Republicans on the regulation of digital assets. Committee chair Patrick McHenry said he expected bipartisan input on a draft bill, with markups following a congressional recess in July.

Waters suggested that without extensive analyses and collaboration between the two political parties, the digital asset legislation could leave the door open for potential fraud and misuse of customer funds. The California Representative cited the collapse of FTX, former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal charges, and the SEC’s recent actions against Binance and Coinbase.

“I’m particularly worried that the Republican bill would allow crypto firms that are currently being sued for violating our securities laws to continue doing business through provisional registration,” said Waters. “The bill appears to halt any enforcement actions by the SEC against crypto firms even when they have committed fraud. This provisional registration could reward bad actors with a ‘get out of jail free’ card and allow them to continue harming consumers and investors.”

The draft bill introduced on June 2 would prohibit the SEC from denying digital asset trading platforms from registering as a regulated alternative trading system and allow such firms to offer “digital commodities and payment stablecoins.” It would also restructure the roles the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) playe in regulating digital assets in the United States.

“The American public was the one left holding the bag when it came to FTX and when it came to the violations, or the alleged violations when it comes to Binance and Coinbase,” said Prometheum founder and co-CEO Aaron Kaplan at the hearing. “The best way forward is pretty clear and logical, is the application of federal securities laws [through the SEC].”

Related: US senator revamps efforts for crypto regulations amid SEC lawsuits

Other lawmakers have responded differently to the seeming regulation-by-enforcement approach by the SEC. On June 12, Ohio Rep. Warren Davidson — a Republican also on the House Financial Services Committee — proposed firing SEC chair Gary Gensler through legislation that would also restructure power at the commission. The legality of this move is unclear.

Amid the SEC lawsuits, Binance.US has pushed back against the commission’s efforts to freeze its funds. At the time of publication, a District of Columbia federal judge was considering competing motions from the SEC, Binance, and Binance.US on how to handle the assets, and other pending legal actions.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

US senators propose AI bills for transparency and innovation

The bipartisan bills target government transparency when using AI and the formation of a new Office of Global Competition Analysis to stay on top of innovation.

Lawmakers in the United States have proposed two new bipartisan bills targeting issues of transparency and innovation in artificial intelligence (AI). 

On June 8, Democratic Senator Gary Peters, and Republican Senators Mike Braun and James Lankford, introduced the first bill, which would require the government to be transparent with its AI usage.

Under such a measure, U.S. government agencies would need to inform the public when it uses AI to interact with them, along with a system for citizens to appeal any decisions made by AI.

Braun stated:

“The federal government needs to be proactive and transparent with AI utilization and ensure that decisions aren’t being made without humans in the driver’s seat.”

The second bill was brought to the table by Democratic Senators Michael Bennet and Mark Warner, along with Republican Senator Todd Young, to establish an official Office of Global Competition Analysis.

This new division is aimed at helping the U.S. stay on top of AI development. Bennet commented that:

“We cannot afford to lose our competitive edge in strategic technologies like semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence to competitors like China.“

The introduction of the bills follows an announcement from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, which called for three upcoming AI briefings to educate lawmakers on the technology.

Related: Pro-Bitcoin DeSantis tagged over AI-faked photos in Trump smear campaign

Regulations targeting AI are beginning to pop up in discussions among lawmakers across the globe. 

Earlier this week, officials in the United Kingdom stressed that AI models need regulation similar to those in the medicine and nuclear power industries. The same day, another U.K. official warned that if these models are not under control ​​within the next two years, they could threaten humanity.

Meanwhile, in Europe, lawmakers are finalizing the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which is a comprehensive set of regulations for the development and deployment of generative AI.

European regulators have taken a similarly urgent approach to AI regulation, most recently saying they are considering requiring all AI-generated content to be labeled as such.

Magazine: BitCulture: Fine art on Solana, AI music, podcast + book reviews

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Two Senators Allege Binance Crypto Exchange Lied to US Congress, Ask Justice Department To Investigate: Report

Two Senators Allege Binance Crypto Exchange Lied to US Congress, Ask Justice Department To Investigate: Report

Two US Senators are reportedly asking the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate crypto exchange Binance for allegedly lying to Congress. According to a new report by Reuters, Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland recently penned a letter to the DOJ claiming that Binance, the largest crypto exchange platform […]

The post Two Senators Allege Binance Crypto Exchange Lied to US Congress, Ask Justice Department To Investigate: Report appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Senator Haggerty Tells Gary Gensler To Expect To Hear From Congress as US Officials Respond to SEC Lawsuits

Senator Haggerty Tells Gary Gensler To Expect To Hear From Congress as US Officials Respond to SEC Lawsuits

US lawmakers are issuing a warning to the Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), saying that he could soon hear from Congress. In a recent announcement, Republican Senator Bill Haggerty of Tennessee says that the SEC Is weaponizing itself to destroy an entire industry and tells Chair Gary Gensler to anticipate having […]

The post Senator Haggerty Tells Gary Gensler To Expect To Hear From Congress as US Officials Respond to SEC Lawsuits appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Congressmen From California and Massachusetts Ask IRS To Get Control of Crypto Tax Evaders

Congressmen From California and Massachusetts Ask IRS To Get Control of Crypto Tax Evaders

Two US congressmen are calling on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to speed up efforts to ensure cryptocurrency users are complying with tax rules. In a new letter, Rep. Brad Sherman of California and Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts blame the crypto industry for a major source of tax evasion. The letter, sent to Treasury […]

The post Congressmen From California and Massachusetts Ask IRS To Get Control of Crypto Tax Evaders appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

US Congressman Moves To Stop CBDC ‘Dead in Its Tracks’, Introduces Bill To Block Federal Reserve

US Congressman Moves To Stop CBDC ‘Dead in Its Tracks’, Introduces Bill To Block Federal Reserve

A Congressman in West Virginia’s second district is introducing a new bill that would keep the Federal Reserve from carrying out experiments related to the use of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In a new press release, Congressman Alex X. Mooney introduces the “Digital Dollar Pilot Prevention Act,” which aims to close a loophole that […]

The post US Congressman Moves To Stop CBDC ‘Dead in Its Tracks’, Introduces Bill To Block Federal Reserve appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Stablecoin issuers have spent over $1.3M lobbying Congress since 2022

Tether and Circle have been leading lobbying efforts among stablecoin issuers as they push for legislation and regulations for stablecoins.

Stablecoin issuers including Tether, Circle, and others have spent well over a million dollars lobbying lawmakers on Capitol Hill since the start of 2022, according to recent data.

Stablecoins have become the center of attention in Washington recently as pressure mounts to roll out a regulatory framework for dollar-pegged digital assets.

Tether uses the law offices of Michael Jason Lee for its lobbying efforts, which are carried out through FTI Government Affairs, a consulting firm with bipartisan connections.

According to public interest outlet ProPublica, Tether has spent around $600,000 since the beginning of 2022, with a quarterly spend of $120,000 for lobbying the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. 

Annual lobbying amounts for Tether. Source: Open Secrets

The lobbying efforts have been to support legislation related to stablecoins. Tether issues the world’s dominant stablecoin, USDT (USDT), which has a market share of 63% and a circulation of $83 billion.

Government transparency group Open Secrets added that Tether spent another $270,000 on lobbying in the first quarter of 2023.

Meanwhile, rival stablecoin issuer Circle has also been spending big on lobbying efforts. The firm began lobbying with strategic consulting firm Invariant in late 2021 and has spent at least $560,000 since then, according to ProPublica.

Circle’s lobbying efforts have revolved around educating policymakers on its business model, educating members of Congress on stablecoin and cryptocurrency issues, and monitoring cryptocurrency proposals.

The company has lobbied the Senate, House of Representatives, Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Circle’s quarterly lobbying budget is currently $100,000. The firm issues USDC (USDC), the world’s second-largest stablecoin, with a market share of 22.6% and circulation of $29.5 billion. On May, 18, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire reiterated the need for stablecoin legislation and safe access to digital dollars. 

Paxos, the former issuer of the Binance stablecoin BUSD, has spent around $300,000 on lobbying since early 2022. Paxos uses bipartisan public policy firm Mindset for its lobbying efforts focused on issues related to drafting stablecoin legislation.

Related: 100 crypto lobbyists prepare for the fight of their lives as Congress resumes

Crypto industry lobbying expenses surged 120% in the United States in 2022, as reported by Cointelegraph earlier this year.

The amount pledged by stablecoin issuers is, however, dwarfed by that spent by other major crypto companies. Coinbase has spent around $5.5 million since it began lobbying in 2015, and Binance.US spent almost $1 million in 2022.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Bitcoin, gold and the debt ceiling — Does something have to give?

Traders are still tiptoeing around markets, as multiple risk events remain at the forefront, but BTC margin and futures markets are starting to favor a bullish breakout.

Bitcoin has been trying to break above the $27,500 resistance for the past week but to no avail. One of the reasons limiting Bitcoin’s (BTC) upside is the risk of an eventual United States default as the government struggles to get the debt limit increase approved in Congress. 

Still, some analysts and investors argue that the U.S. debt ceiling standoff is merely a “show” because, ultimately, additional money will hit the markets.

Notice how MacroJack correlates Bitcoin’s digital scarcity to the next logical step: additional inflationary pressure. The stimulus measures, meaning increasing the government debt limit, might initially sound positive because they avoid default and favor more economic activity. However, the unintended consequences are future budget constraints as the debt interest payment increases.

Bitcoin price increases while gold breaks a 45-day low

Bitcoin’s gains above $27,000 happened while gold traded down 2.5% from May 15 to May 18, reaching its lowest level in 45 days at $1,970. Meanwhile, the U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the currency against a basket of foreign exchanges, reached its highest level in two months on May 18, meaning the U.S. currency gained strength relative to its global peers.

This data should not be interpreted as a vote of confidence in the government’s ability to avoid a shutdown, as the global economy would be negatively impacted in the event of a U.S. debt default. For instance, eurozone members hold $1.54 trillion in U.S. Treasurys, followed by Japan’s $1.1 trillion, China’s $860 billion and the United Kingdom’s $668 billion.

Strong macroeconomic data explains the resilience of equities markets

While the global economy may deteriorate in the coming months, recent macroeconomic data has been mostly positive, causing the S&P 500 index to hold modest gains in May, standing merely 13% below its all-time high.

For instance, China’s retail sales grew 18.4% year-over-year in April, while the eurozone’s first-quarter gross domestic product increased by 1.3% versus the previous year. In the U.S., retail sales rose 0.5% year-over-year in April, slightly lower than expected but far from being a recession indicator.

Let’s look at Bitcoin derivatives metrics to better understand how professional traders are positioned in the current market environment.

Bitcoin margin and futures favor bullish momentum

Margin markets provide insight into how professional traders are positioned because they allow investors to borrow cryptocurrency to leverage their positions.

OKX, for instance, provides a margin-lending indicator based on the stablecoin/BTC ratio. Traders can increase their exposure by borrowing stablecoins to buy Bitcoin. On the other hand, Bitcoin borrowers can only bet on the decline of a cryptocurrency’s price.

OKX stablecoin/BTC margin-lending ratio. Source: OKX

The above chart shows that OKX traders’ margin-lending ratio increased between May 12 and May 17. Such data coincides with Bitcoin’s price recovery in the period, although it is not troublesome, as the current 31 margin-lending ratio nears its 30-day average.

Investors should also analyze the BTC futures long-to-short metric, as it excludes externalities that might have solely impacted the margin markets. There are occasional methodological discrepancies between exchanges, so readers should monitor changes instead of absolute figures.

Exchanges’ top traders Bitcoin long-to-short ratio. Source: CoinGlass

Despite Bitcoin trading down 8% since May 5, pro traders have recently increased their bullish positions to their highest level in two weeks, according to the long-to-short indicator.

For instance, the ratio for OKX increased from 1.08 on May 12 to 1.25 on May 18. Meanwhile, at crypto exchange Binance, the long-to-short ratio increased from 1.14 on May 12 to the current 1.25.

Related: Bitcoin price capitulation below $26K possible as Friday’s BTC options expiry looms

Bitcoin bulls are in a better position, as there has been weak demand from short-sellers and no sign of excessive leverage from buyers. In other words, Bitcoin’s market structure is bullish, so odds favor a rally toward $28,000 if the U.S. debt ceiling stand-off continues.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

US House stablecoin hearing focuses on competing bills for regulation

The answer to the question of what level stablecoin issuers are regulated on “need not be binary,” one witness said.

State versus federal regulation was a key issue in the hearing on stablecoins in the United States House of Representatives on May 18. The House Committee on Financial Services’ new Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion heard testimony from five experts as it considered two proposed bills to regulate stablecoins.

There were two draft bills under consideration by the subcommittee. The Republican bill was published in April ahead of a hearing on stablecoin in the Financial Services Committee. Ranking member Maxine Waters later introduced a competing draft based on a bill that was introduced but not passed in the last session of Congress.

The “race to the bottom” was the biggest point of disagreement on state-level stablecoin regulation. The Republican bill would allow stablecoin operators to choose the state they register in, without going through the Federal Reserve Board.

Supporters of the bill argue the floor would prevent the race to the bottom and mirror the U.S. two-tiered federal/state banking regulatory system. Democrats were unconvinced. The Democratic bill preserves access to regulation in federal hands, with the appropriate regulator. David Portilla, partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, favored a middle road. He said:

“Federal regulation of stablecoin issuers would offer more uniform, consistent rules, whereas state regulation could promote more diversity and innovation in regulation and supervision. The answer to this question need not be binary.”

In any case, current regulations were not suited for stablecoins, he said. Besides a “floor” mechanism for federal involvement in stablecoin regulation for setting minimum standards, there could be a “toggle” based on the size of the issue, he said. The Republican bill would regulate all issuers identically, regardless of size.

Related: Congressional crypto hearing illustrates political stalemate on digital assets

National interest came up repeatedly, with Rep. Brad Sherman, an ardent opponent of cryptocurrency, claiming that a dollar-backed stablecoin would compete with the fiat dollar and undermine it, thus reducing the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions. 

Another stakeholder, Matt Homer of venture capital firm XYZ, said: “stablecoins will happen regardless of whether we want them to happen or not," adding: "offshore issuers are as free to create dollar-backed stablecoins as U.S. issuers. We should have it done in the U.S. so we can regulate it on our own terms.” Pro-crypto Warren Davidson echoed Homer, saying:

“Often they [stablecoin developers] are fleeing our shores to find certainty. So it would be great if we’d provide some.”

USDF Foundation CEO Robert Morgan spoke in favor of the current regulatory structure and about the advantages of tokenization for traditional banks. He described tokenization as a “third way.”

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta