1. Home
  2. digital asset laws

digital asset laws

Coinbase signals EU, Canada, Brazil, Singapore and Australia as priorities

The crypto exchange’s focus on non-U.S. markets is part of a next phase in its expansion plans, said the firm.

Coinbase has flagged several countries outside the United States where it intends to focus its operations in the near term, citing their comparatively clearer crypto laws.

In a Sep. 6 blog post, Coinbase’s international business VP, Nana Murugesan and international policy VP, Tom Duff Gordon, marked the European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Brazil, Singapore and Australia as “near-term priority markets.”

The pair said the countries are “enacting clear rules” and Coinbase would focus on “acquiring licenses, registering, and establishing and strengthening operations” in them.

“Every part of the world is seeing progress on crypto-forward regulation — except for the U.S., which is opting for a ‘strategy’ of enforcement of existing rules and new regulations through the courts,” the pair wrote.

They added the country is “sidelining itself” on crypto regulations which puts at risk its influence over the space.

“We’re committed to helping to update the global financial system and providing more economic freedom and opportunity, and won’t stand idle just because the U.S. is,” they wrote.

The crypto exchange faces regulatory action in its native U.S. — with a lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission accusing it of selling unregistered securities and operating illegally.

‘Go Broad, Go Deep’ goes phase 2

Coinbase’s new priority markets are part of the second phase of its expansion plans — which it dubbed “Go Broad, Go Deep.”

It outlined its plans to establish partnerships with global and local banks and payment providers to expand its fiat ramps along with assuring its governance systems are compliant.

Related: Aave, Circle, Base become founding members of Tokenized Asset Coalition

Its lobbying and visibility efforts will also intensify ahead of the EU elections next June.

It flagged plans to engage with the G20 aiming to create global crypto standards and will keep a “scorecard” on each country's crypto regulatory progress.

Coinbase is seemingly focusing its G20 lobbying efforts on Brazil — set to take the G20 chair in 2024.

In March, Coinbase expanded its offering in Brazil and according to the blog post co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong will visit the country later this year “to engage with key decision-makers and stakeholders.”

Magazine: Asia Express: Thailand’s national airdrop, Delio users screwed, Vietnam top crypto country

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

UK Law Commission expects ‘substantial impact’ from digital asset law review

Legal jurisdictional issues relating to cryptocurrencies and digital assets have necessitated a law reform project sponsored by the Ministry of Justice.

The Law Commission of England and Wales hopes to establish the United Kingdom as a leading jurisdiction for grappling with legal disputes involving emerging technologies like cryptocurrencies, digital assets and electronic documentation.

The project, dubbed "Digital Assets: Which Law, Which Court?" was announced on Oct. 18 with the aim of reviewing international legal challenges involving cryptocurrencies and providing recommendations for legal reform in the United Kingdom.

Cointelegraph reached out to Professor Sarah Green, Law Commissioner for Commercial and Common Law, to unpack the driving force behind the authority's latest law reform project. The U.K.’s legal review body has previously conducted projects aimed at smart contracts, digital assets and decentralized autonomous organizations.

According to Green, the previous law reform projects identified several issues in determining which laws apply to international tech-related disputes and which courts should reside over them.

Related: UK gov't introduces bill aimed at empowering authorities' to 'seize, freeze and recover' crypto

As Green explained, existing rules of private international laws applicable to property disputes are based on the property in question having clear, definitive locations. This gives a clear connection to a particular legal jurisdiction.

Given that digital assets and emerging technologies do not typically fit this ‘traditional mold,’ existing  laws for disputes involving digital assets and the courts that should hear them are not necessarily fit for purpose:

“This has resulted in an element of uncertainty regarding how a court may apply the existing rules. Indeed, English courts have already had to grapple with the difficult question of where certain digital assets are located for the purposes of establishing jurisdiction in relation to international defendants.”

Green then gave a couple of examples of legal disputes in 2020 and 2021. These cases were hamstrung by the difficulty of determining the jurisdiction of the digital assets involved. The process is crucial in deciding if a claimant can serve proceedings in a given court or country. As Green highlighted, the cases in question provided real-world instances that call for legal clarity:

“The issues are not abstract or hypothetical, but real and tangible." 

The Law Commission will aim to produce a report setting out recommendations for reform in the context of private international law and digital assets. This will then be put out for public consultation with draft recommendations for law reforms in the second half of 2023.

Green highlighted her belief that the project would have a substantial impact on the status of English law as a preferred choice of law and jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes:

“It is all very well proposing reforms to English domestic law, but to extract the full benefit of those reforms, they should ideally be accompanied by reforms to the rules that determine whether English law applies and whether English courts can hear the dispute in the first place.”

The U.K. Law Commission proposed a number of law reforms aimed at providing wider recognition and legal protections for cryptocurrency and digital asset users in July 2022. The move was driven by rapid growth in ownership and trading of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and cryptocurrencies in the country.

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Anchorage co-founder to US regulators: ‘What we want is clarity’

There’s “15 different regulators” and “basically no clarity” when it comes to cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, according to Diogo Mónica.

Anchorage Digital co-founder and president Diogo Mónica has called for regulatory clarity in the United States, which he said remains muddy due to the politicization of Web3 technology and a lack of coordinated effort from the industry.

Speaking to Cointelegraph ahead of the company’s push into the Asian market, Mónica said there was a night-and-day difference between the regulatory experience in Singapore compared to the U.S.

“Singapore, it really is a breath of fresh air […] It's very different to have one regulator,” Mónica said, adding regardless of the asset type it’s the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, “that you interact with for everything.”

While in the U.S., he believes there’s “basically no clarity” with little information on where assets legally fit, adding even if a company understands the rules governing an asset “you barely know which regulator you actually have to engage with.”

“We have 15 different regulators, and all of them are fighting in the public eye for dominance of the industry and making contradicting statements. What we want is clarity. We want some kind of regulation.”

Mónica said the U.S. made Web3 a partisan issue, politicizing the technology and labelling it as left or right wing, which afterwards became “political jockeying sticks versus actually being [about the] technology.”

“I have no idea how we did this, but it's supposed to be bipartisan, it’s not ‘blue’ or ‘red’ it's supposed to be, in the case of Bitcoin, ‘gold’, right? It's ‘digital gold’, so that's the color it should be.”

He believes the industry’s lack of a “concentrated and coordinated approach” in communicating certain aspects, such as its environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) message, has played a part in this, though high-profile mistakes have also contributed to the issue.

“Of course, there's been tons of unforced errors,” Mónica added, making particular reference to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) crackdown on celebrities who promoted cryptocurrencies.

Related: Crypto and decentralization could influence voters in 2022 US midterm elections: Report

He also mentioned the collapse of the Terra ecosystem and how the industry “should have self regulated” beforehand by being more explicit about what an algorithmic stablecoin is.

“Lots of people knew this, the code was open source, we all knew what was happening and still we allowed it to get to $40 billion without a lot of without a lot of naysayers.”

Mónica thinks people were “lulled” into a thought pattern of “things only go up and things only go right” adding that now, "we're paying for it." 

Anchorage provides infrastructure for institutions to enable digital asset custody, exchange, staking and other Web3-related services, it was the first crypto firm in the U.S. to receive a national crypto bank charter in January 2021.

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets