1. Home
  2. Features

Features

Blockchain games take on the mainstream: Here’s how they can win

Gaming is now one of the most profitable sectors of the entertainment industry, with consumer spending in the United States growing 8% in 2021 to top $60.4 billion in revenue. Worldwide, the games market generated an estimated $180.3 billion in 2021, up 1.4%.

Within that segment are the hugely popular play-to-earn blockchain-based games, which are growing at an even faster pace given their virtual standstill some two years ago. But are blockchain games good enough to compete with more mainstream titles?

In its 2021 annual report, The Blockchain Game Alliance says that NFT games generated $2.32 billion in revenue in the third quarter of 2021, or 22% of all NFT trading volume. Making the most waves was Axie Infinity with its much-publicized popularity in the Philippines during COVID-19 lockdowns which became the first blockchain game to top $1 billion in NFT sales.

The report reveals that 68% of BGA members felt the growth was attributable to the P2E sector, and 85% said true ownership of digital goods in games is the secret sauce behind blockchain game successes.

 

Blockchain gaming
Can blockchain games compete on gameplay and appeal with mainstream titles?

 

Jack Boreham, editor-in-chief of Metaverse Insider, has been following the trends over the past two years and believes blockchain gaming or NFT games, as he likes to call them will be adopted by mainstream publishers.

The beauty of NFT games is that they invert the institutional hierarchy of video gaming so that the power comes from the base of decentralized gamers and not the executives, says Boreham. And yes, big names will come in, but not for a couple of years, and the first ones are likely to be characterized as the more off-centre brands such as Nintendo.

So, is it just a matter of P2E goading traditional video gaming, or will the two parallel streams meet, merge or consume one another? The bigger names such as Ubisoft, Square Enix and Sega have already dipped their toes in the water by introducing NFTs, but they have witnessed backlash from traditional gamers. This article talks to those gamers who have already gone down the rabbit hole of P2E to see what the future of gaming might look like and discover if blockchain can compete for the hearts and minds of gamers everywhere.

 

 

Gachapon is one of Lepricons first games, in which the gachapon machine gifts players mystery NFTs.

 

 

Traditional gamers meet the future

Phil Ingram, a long-time gamer and CEO of blockchain-based gaming platform Lepricon, is bullish on P2E gaming if the games get better.

If gaming is going to be the first killer [app] to on-ramp people for mass adoption, then we have to make blockchain gaming more like video gaming, he says.

P2E is a bit like grinding in video gaming the place where you need to kill multiple monsters or repeat actions to move up to the next level. Its very different, and no one plays video games to grind.

The fact that rewards or assets earned or won in the game actually belong to the player is helping P2E get away with some fairly unappealing gameplay at present. Blockchain is all about owning assets and that they cant be taken away from you unless you leave your private keys at a bus stop. This is the point that enables a subtle shift from publisher-first economies to player-first, he says.

The problem is that blockchain is dictating the gaming and not the other way around. Indeed, most blockchain games are glorified ways to sell NFTs.

 

 

Lepricons Street Food Pinball. A free-to-play, earn-by-playing, hypercasual platform with games like pinball is in development.

 

 

On gaming

Funnily enough, grinding is something that On Yavin doesnt mind. In fact, he calls it his personal method of practicing mindfulness. Yavin is the founder and managing partner of Cointelligence Fund, which actively invests in the Metaverse more specifically, blockchain games.

A long-time gamer himself rumor has it he was born with a keyboard in his hand with a particular fondness for World of Warcraft, Yavin still plays between 30 and 90 minutes every day.

Part of my role is to undertake due diligence on new games, to see if we will invest in them or not. My hobby has become my job.

For Yavin, there are three critical elements essential for any successful game. The first is the story, and the second is the games mechanics how it is built and how the gameplay works out.

Then the quality of the graphics and visuals is a huge determination in how successful the game will be.

 

 

Decimated, a survival role-playing game, is one of Cointelligence Funds investments.

 

 

The MMO, or massively multiplayer online gaming, is also of great importance.

When I first began gaming, it was against the machine, which could make it very sterile, says Yavin. Now, with MMO, the gameplay is very different and much more exciting, as I am playing against or with other humans. That and the social part. Gamers come together in guilds to handle joint operations. If you screw up, you can kill all the others on the team. Trust me, you dont want to do that. But when it goes well, then you can find yourself talking about that particular operation for weeks.

As part of his work, Yavin played Axie Infinity, which he found relaxing (see the note on grinding above). While money does not form part of his motivation, he feels the unfairness of spending thousands of hours on a traditional game where the game owners still own the assets.

According to Yavin, most P2E games are not fun. Actually, most are shit, he says, apologizing for the profanity.

Cointelligence Fund also invested in Moonray, an action-RPG blockchain game.

James Stell, head of investing at Blockpioneers a venture capital firm investing in games and gambling in esports also comes from the gaming world. Like Yavin, he really enjoys the social side of gaming. Stell plays between two and three hours a day after work and compares it to watching television.

Stells poison of choice is Call of Duty, which he plays with a group of real-life friends. He also has a whole other business, running a pub near London Bridge. As the convivial barman, he hears a lot of news about P2E, as his crypto friends hang out in his bar and he also hosts events related to crypto interests.

Mind you, the last time we tried to host an event for Axie Infinity, the invite list got too big and they had to move to a larger venue.

Stell doesnt see current incarnations of P2E becoming massively popular in the United Kingdom and other Western countries, given that there are easier ways to earn more money. However, he does see the nascent P2E gaming space as very innovative.

The large traditional gaming studios, which have deep war chests, are definitely eyeing the marketplace. Theyve shown a lot of interest in NFTs, but they are not going to shoot the golden goose by giving away profits before they have to. But they will come in, sooner rather than later.

 

 

 

In principle, theyre good

Unlike Stell, who sees the automatic entrance of traditional gaming companies, Yavin is betting on blockchain companies learning to think like gamers.

Yavin says P2E games arent there yet but have two important aspects that will ensure the sectors success.

The first is the social aspect, epitomized by guilds and DAOs springing up alongside the more popular games. The second is the money generated through true ownership of in-game digital assets.

Peoples lives have been changed already in places like the Philippines. I am so excited that people can leave potentially dangerous, manually difficult jobs and instead play games to support their family. As a gamer, this makes me very excited.

Axie Infinity not only led the space in replacing incomes lost during COVID-19 lockdowns but was also the focus for the formation of player guilds, providing next-level access and support. The most prominent of these is Yield Guild Games, a DAO.

The concept behind YGG is that it holds valuable NFT assets from games and then lends them to the player community so they can play the games and earn cryptocurrencies. Axie Infinity was the first P2E game that caught its attention, but it now partners with more than 40 P2E games, including big names like The Sandbox, League of Kingdoms and Splinterlands.

 

 

Axie Infinities esports tournament hosted by YGG Managers Cup
The YGG Managers Cup, an Axie Infinity esports tournament.

 

 

Gabby Dizon, co-founder of YGG, explains that the guild is growing its community worldwide, setting up sub-DAOs across Southeast Asia, India and Latin America. Already, there are more than 100,000 members on Discord and 26,000 scholars gamers who rent NFTs in exchange for returning 20% of profits to the community manager who recruited them and 10% to YGG.

“Our community takes home 70% of the earnings. We built this to support the community, and it will always be like this.

The guild has its own treasury of assets and has borrowed money from venture capital firms $4.6 million in August 2021 to purchase NFTs. Enabling resource-poor scholars to start earning is a big incentive for P2E to compete with traditional gaming.

 

 

A YGG League of Kingdoms stream.

 

 

As for the fun side of things, Dizon was playing Axie Infinity for four hours a day before helping found YGG in 2020.

And it wasnt so I could earn extra money but for the social side of things. Its like setting up a business with friends you win together, interact together and, yes, make money together. Its the community layer that makes it fresh and makes our guild relevant.

Dizon believes that all games based on economies will use blockchain in the next five to 10 years.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

London-based OG John Gower of Blockchase and AngelDAO invests in events and games and has also played Axie Infinity for the fun of it. Like Yavin, he loves the true ownership of in-game digital assets, which he sees as the secret sauce for P2E games.

I also run a number of scholarships in Axie Infinity. That way, I can give back to the community and continue to make an income on my NFTs. Its a win-win for both.

Traditional and blockchain gaming worlds collide

The WAX blockchain, a sister chain to EOS, set out to become the self-proclaimed King of NFTs, and it certainly can rival other blockchains for the sheer volume of NFTs being minted and high-profile collections dropping, including from Star Treks William Shatner, Nature Boy Ric Flair, The Princess Bride and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

However, its the WAX-based games that are now building capabilities and drawing attention from a number of users.

More evidence that the traditional gaming world is being sucked into blockchain games can be seen in the fact that Alien Worlds, the second-largest blockchain game by monthly active users, recently announced a bridge to Minecraft wherein its 170 million players can now sign up to mine and earn Trilium, the native currency of Alien Worlds.

A Female Nordic from Alien Worlds.

With six competing planets, its gameplay function is focused on hypersocial interaction via setting up Planet DAOs where players are able to vote on work proposals or invest in off-chain activities such as providing funds to charities or disaster-affected areas. Alien Worlds co-founder Saro McKenna says:

This bridge is significant in that we are linking one of the worlds most popular decentralized games to the blockchain and opening up a world of new possibilities for Minecraft players through our social metaverse. We think our combination of economics, team strategy and earning will convert Minecraft players of all ages into Web3 players.

Blockchain Brawlers, developed by WAX Studios, was launched in 2021. In the game, players can buy wrestlers (brawlers) of various rarity levels via auction. Prices for the quirky characters were initially in the hundreds of dollars but soon escalated to many thousands. Currently, the cost to buy an entry-level, common-rarity brawler and necessary equipment is around a hefty $1,000. When gameplay went live at the end of March 2022, a massive $430 million in volume was traded in the first two weeks.

 

 

Blockchain Brawlers, the first P2E game developed by WAX Studios.

 

 

To put it in context, the average player is earning 2,000 BRWL tokens and 4 Gold per day, worth around $480 at the time of writing. While lacking some of the intensity of traditional video games, Blockchain Brawlers cannot be criticized for lacking the levels of income seen in the West.

Many startups are now seriously addressing the sector, combining fun gameplay with real earnings.

Utopian Game Labs, headed by Anthony Charlton, has a strong management team with decades of gaming experience. His teams approach to creating what he claims is the best NFT treasure hunt of all time is to create a game in which digital assets are operated like they are in traditional video games.

 

 

Time Raiders from Utopian Games.

 

 

While a small indie player, we reckon our game, Time Raiders, will look and feel like a AAA game, says Charlton.

The companys approach is only to use blockchain to mint assets off-chain. The gamer plays and then decides to cash out the assets by minting them into a MetaMask wallet where they can then be traded on a secondary sales platform.

We keep the game and earn separate. In fact, we call it play-and-earn, says Charlton.

Adam Bouktila, founder of Metaxy, uses the same term play-and-earn only his company is basing its P2E game on an existing video game. The team has incorporated some interesting aspects into the earning portion, with gamers not only able to win a native token but also Bitcoin and Ether.

 

 

The new Metaxy game will allow players to earn Bitcoin in addition to native tokens.

 

 

We believe the combination of a real video game combined with an ability to earn recognized cryptocurrency will be a major game changer, says Bouktila.

And since we are based in Ireland, we are going to take advantage of all the Web2 and Web3 professionals here. Itll be guaranteed Irish.

Metaxy is building on several other elements, such as quests where rival teams can fight and loot BTC, and Bouktila says there is a mobile version in the roadmap too.

Mobile gaming, as witnessed by the popularity of Axie Infinity, is a powerful tool in the toolbox for P2E developers. Enter mobile gaming professional Hugo Furneaux, CEO of PlayEmber, who describes his business model as producing hypercasual mobile games. The numbers are impressive, with PlayEmber games racking up 100 million downloads with an average of 6 million monthly active users.

BunkerBudz, a P2E game developed by PayEmber
Bunker Budz, a P2E game developed by PlayEmber.

Most titles, like Hyper Cards and Slingshot Crash, are generally played in short bursts for example, while commuting on a train and are played primarily by women. The company is launching Bunker Budz, its first P2E title, with Bunker Galz coming soon.

Our emphasis is low CPI, low cost, but very scalable. We call our games snackable, says Furneaux. We currently create for non-gamers and think adding the attraction of P2E is going to reach a whole new audience who want to snack and earn on the way to work.

At the end of the day, P2E is more complicated than simply being the next iteration of video gaming. It combines social interaction, philanthropy, income-generation, mindfulness, and increasingly, mobile apps meaning it more and more matters less that people have to grind, or that they need to have better graphics, or even that they can earn income.

So, will big AAA names enter the P2E and NFT gaming space, or will the two tracks carry on in parallel paths? At the moment, both sides are jockeying for space, with P2E learning some tricks from traditional gaming, notably to increase the fun quotient.

But traditional gaming is currently missing a core component of community engagement: incentivizing the community with earnings. Once the P2E sector figures out how to ramp up the fun element, the race will truly be on. In the future, traditional gaming companies will likely be forced to relinquish some of their profits and control back to the gamers, whether they want to or not.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Helping Ukraine without donating: Laura’s DeFi staking plan

Laura K. Inamedinova is a marketing agency CEO from Lithuania who started early with ICOs, a journey that has led her to launch UkrainianPool, an initial staking pool offering raising money for the Ukrainian government.

Inamedinova got into ICOs right out of university in 2016 and is shy to mention the name of the first crypto fundraising project she worked for. There were definitely not only bad projects, but you didnt know at that time, she explains, referring to the early days of the industry. You didnt know that anything was off at the time, she says with a chuckle.

Inamedinovas early plunge into the industry may not have met with success, but after a number of more successful projects such as Waves and CoinGate, her experience has led to a most interesting development: a humanitarian fundraiser in collaboration with the Ukrainian government.

 

 

Laura Inamedinova
Laura Inamedinova created Ukrainian Pool.

 

 

UkrainianPool is a Cardano staking pool that works by allowing anyone to deposit Cardano into the pool, which grows at 5% per year, according to Cardanos staking rewards schedule. Inamedinova explains that this form of charitable support is effectively risk-free because staked tokens can be un-staked at any time and never leave the owners wallet. Inamedinova explains:

Every five days, accumulated rewards get passed on to the Ukrainian governments wallet.

The project became possible after Inamedinova, who was close to a DeFi project that incorporated the ISPO strategy, came to the realization that the staking pools could be used for charity. She shared the idea with Nadiia Dvoinos, a serial entrepreneur who used to run Quadrate 28 an in-house marketing firm for startups. Inamedinova met her on her first visit to Dubai and describes Dvoinos as a mentor.

 

 

 

 

Dvoinos got in touch with her former business partner Valeriya Ionan, who now serves as Ukraines deputy minister for eurointegration at the Ministry of Digital Transformation. A zoom call was arranged with various government figures on March 8, and UkrainianPool went live soon after.

Only 10 days after the call, Ukrainian Deputy Minister of Digital Transformation Alex Bornyakov explained the project to The New York Times:

Participants do not need to directly donate assets to raise money. Instead, they stake their funds temporarily, which generates high-interest yields that are transferred to a wallet owned by our ministry.

He added that the pools goal is to raise $10 million for humanitarian efforts things such as food, medicine and protective equipment, including helmets and ballistic vests, according to other publications by the ministry.

As far as I know, this is the first charitable project using the ISPO model, Inamedinova notes, referring to an initial staking pool offering.

 

 

A publication posted on Twitter shows donations made by the ministry. Source: Ukrainian Ministry of Digital Transformation

 

 

LKI Consulting

Inamedinova runs LKI Consulting, which has a team of 10 staff members distributed across Europe. We have two Ukrainians; we just hired a refugee, she notes.

The company represents Inamedinovas return to the blockchain marketing niche. As we meet in Dubais Marina Mall in an office overlooking a yacht club, she recounts a meeting she just left. I had to sit through the whole hour to be polite, though I knew within five minutes that it wasnt going to work these guys dont even know what they are building, she laments regarding her prospective clients.

The industry sucked me in without me even planning that, Inamedinova recounts regarding her return to the blockchain industry in 2020 after having previously left behind the glamorous life of an initial coin offering consultant in the 20162017 bull market.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

This time, the cryptocurrency market was different, as the ICO funding mechanism had gone out of style in part owing to the fact that the majority of ICO investors had lost money during the 2017 cryptocurrency bubble, during which anonymous teams were raising tens of millions of dollars with just a white paper or vague slideshow.

 

 

The famous meme detailing exactly how many ICOs played out.

 

 

The initial stake pool offering was thought up as an alternative by DeFi project Meld, which conducted one to successfully raise millions in October 2021 after 40,000 users staked over $1 billion of Cardanos ADA. While discussing Melds success with a close friend in the early days of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they came to a realization that ISPO and Ukraine these two words just made sense, Inamedinova recounts. In addition to Inamedinova, the initiative includes Paulius Vaitkeviius, Ugnius ekas and Karolis Gogaitis, all of whom are from Lithuania.

ICO promoter

Though Inamedinova was born in Lithuanias capital, Vilnius, she spent much of her childhood abroad, first in Vietnam and later in Thailand, where her father worked in the real estate industry. The family moved back to Lithuania as Inamedinova reached her teens, and at 14, she was excited to get a job with a home appliance business owned by a family friend.

My first job wasnt glamorous. It was literally cleaning used washing machines and refrigerators, she recalls, adding that the 15 Litas she made per machine was a significant amount for someone her age in pre-euro Lithuania.

Upon graduating high school, she began a Bachelor of Physics on a full scholarship at Vilnius University in 2012. Despite her love of science, Inamedinova soon decided, Im not going to be a scientist; I dont want to be in the lab for extended periods of time, as Im more of a people person. As she excelled in giving group presentations, Inamedinova felt that my role could be to communicate difficult concepts in a way that is easy to understand and began pursuing internships outside the lab.

 

 

 

 

Her first internship was in cybersecurity with Barclays bank. The experience broadened her horizons, fuelling a deeper interest in economics and finance. Describing herself as always having held a libertarian outlook, Inamedinova joined a free-market think tank, which she saw as a way to break into the field of economics. After some time in what she describes as a male-dominated industry, Inamedinova says that it was quite clearly communicated between the lines that Im never going to be taken seriously in that sector due to my gender, so she changed course toward the technology industry.

She began helping a friend with a startup that resembled a Kickstarter for startups, where the best ideas get funded, but the project failed to take off.

She also interned at Vinted, a company selling used clothing that went on to become the first unicorn tech company in Lithuania. They were still a small company at the time; I was doing customer support, she recalls.

 

 

Inamedinova tells her story from a conference room overlooking the Dubai Marina. Photo by Elias Ahonen

 

 

Though she had no real experience in public relations, she was hired as a communications for Plag, a social media app, whose hiring manager told her, You talk a lot, so I think youll be good with journalists. While taking care of marketing for her employer, Inamedinova came to realize that she also wanted to build a personal brand as an expert in the business and technology sector.

While attending Web Summit in Ireland, Inamedinova met Forbes managing editor Bruce Upbin, who mentioned that the magazine was looking for someone to cover technology in the Baltics, which is where Lithuania is located. I think he liked that I was hustling and building something, and he offered her the opportunity. Beginning in April 2016, she wrote pieces such as 20 Growth-Hacking Strategists You Should Follow In 2016 and, in July, began contributing what she calls thought leader articles to Huffington Post as well.

Her career as a reporter came to an end, however, when a new managing editor took issue with Inamedinovas work in marketing and told her that she should choose to be either a journalist or a public relations person. I was, like, Sorry, Im going to be a PR person, she recalls telling her manager.

It was around this time that crypto came knocking at my door in 2016 when, due to her experience in public relations, a friend of a friend asked for assistance in launching an initial coin offering, or ICO. Though Inamedinova knew little about the blockchain industry, she felt she had nothing to lose.

Laura, why dont you help us fundraise money for our project? Were only gonna have three Ws: Website, White paper, and a Wallet. Were going to be rich. That was his pitch.

The team managed to raise a few million dollars, and Inamedinova realized that she had a unique opportunity at hand. When you do one ICO and talk about it, others start approaching you. This was a huge opportunity for me, as I was only 21 at the time, she recounts. With a year in the industry, she knew she could build a personal brand. I can actually make a difference here. I can be listened to and build something, she reasons, with the existing technology marketing world being far more competitive for a newcomer.

The ICO consulting industry gave Inamedinova the opportunity to travel the world, attending conferences and often giving speeches. Companies she worked with in this time included CoinGate and Waves, both of which were proper and are still operational, she notes.

I was speaking about crypto everywhere in London, Belgrade and a workshop in New York. So, basically, after a year and a half doing crypto, I was the OG, honestly, she says with a laugh.

The clients I worked with in 20162017 raised more than $200 million via crypto funding methods ICOs, STOs, everything like that.

Despite loving the spotlight, Inamedinova took a break for a year as the ICO market dried up. After some reflection, she decided that my career, my business is the most important thing for me and, in 2019, returned to PR work her bread and butter taking the lead of communications at both Cybernews, a technology media outlet, and Aurora Cannabis hemp division. I was always doing at least two things at a time, she explains, adding that she ultimately developed a dislike for the cannabis industry and its promotion of recreational use.

As signs of optimism returned to the crypto market around 2020, so did the need for crypto PR.

I started to get a lot of inquiries from my old acquaintances they needed everything related to crypto marketing.

The future of ISPOs

Considering Cardanos 5% annualized payout, the $10-million goal would require $200 million of ADA to be staked for one year a little less than 1% of the $23.4 billion of ADA, which is currently staked. So far, however, only about $200,000 is staked in the pool, meaning that the biweekly payout to the ministry would amount to a measly $400 funding is 0.1% complete, in other words.

 

 

 

 

This lack of engagement is somewhat surprising, considering that the vast majority of Cardano staking pools operate in countries considered supportive of Ukraines cause, which would suggest that the Cardano community might also be generally supportive. That said, the drawback of ISPO strategies as they exist so far is that they are limited to single cryptocurrencies, meaning that promotion must target a highly specific community as opposed to cryptocurrency holders in general.

 

 

Adatainment.com collects information on the locations of Cardano staking pool operators.

 

 

ISPOs can be conducted using any token that offers API for staking, possibly including Ethereum later on.

Inamedinova believes that the ISPO model has a bright future both in charity donations and startup funding because the psychology of contributing money from staking is different from that of more traditional philanthropy or investing, which typically involves budgeting and allocating money away from other competing purposes. Since the whole idea of the staking pool offering is that you dont actually have to give away money, participating in an ISPO does not feel like money is actually being spent.

When people invest, they think there needs to be a certain percentage likelihood of it actually working I could see ISPOs becoming a fun way of funding moonshots.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Basic and weird: What the Metaverse is like right now

Everyone knows the Metaverse is coming, but no one knows what it will be like.

At present, people say its clunky and difficult to use and are waiting for further development. Are brands just jumping on a PR bandwagon in hyperspeed? Is this the future? Is it a place or a time that is coming? And how soon?

So, I packed my virtual bags and took a trip to find out.

Most of you have probably entered or seen images of the Metaverse, maybe somewhere like The Sandbox or Decentraland. But unless youre a gamer or a devotee, visiting it may still be a little underwhelming, at least for now and especially for gamers.

If youve seen Second Life (circa 2006) or even Golden Eye 007 from the late 1990s, itll be familiar, as the Metaverses graphics havent advanced that far forward from those pixelated images.

Of course, now we have virtual reality headsets to put you right in among those pixelated images.

Shared virtual worlds created in part by users already exist elsewhere. Roblox has 43 million daily active users and 202 million monthly active users, half of whom are under 12. You make friends online these days if youre 12. So, the investment thesis is clear: These kids will not feel so strange in the Metaverse.

And adults still feel the need to escape to different realities. Escapism is ageless. Pokemon Go was a global phenomenon accelerated by a nostalgia that made sense to everyone.

Here are two things I learned from my trips to the Metaverse over the past few weeks:

First, the Metaverse works well for virtual events.

Second, the Metaverse only works well for virtual events.

 

 

Metaverse guide
To be honest, visiting the Metaverse is kind of basic right now.

 

Ready Player One

Im not a gamer. I like ocean sports and the outdoors. Im a believer in decentralized tech and all that it may or may not offer, but Im not sure the current version of the Metaverse is the place Id like to hang.

My avatar
My eventual avatar.

I enter Decentraland, and I soon face choices: Should I select a cartoonish or realistic avatar?

This first part makes sense. Who should I be in Decentraland? Peoples images of themselves never correlate with other peoples images of them.

I decide to choose a woman. I feel obliged to choose the Sailor Moon Japanese schoolgirl outfit, as thats the image of Comic-Con seared into my brain.

The avatar helps you choose by grunting at the outfit selections, more approvingly for some choices. You can select a bald woman or buy banana skins in the gift shop. In the end, my desire to do something different is undercut by impatience, so I click randomize to keep the story moving and get a man dressed in something I might actually wear.

 

 

Lucky, I didnt choose a Sailor Moon outfit for the party. Awkward.

 

 

Loading… Then I jump off a diving board into a wormhole, which I initially thought was a stripper pole.

I spawn in Genesis Plaza, a bar in a shopping mall plaza for avatars a bar without alcohol.

 

 

Jumping
Me jumping at the same time as another person. Our pixels got stuck and froze, and I had to reload.

 

 

There are numerous avatars everywhere. Most people look remarkably human, aside from a dogeman (Shiba Inu, not Chewbacca) and a purple octopus woman. We can speak in real time, so I try to strike up a few conversations. Yo, I offer, which is met with Hi. Good chat. (I thought Do you come here often? might come off wrong.)

 

 

Do you come here often?

 

 

Im struck by the thought that, maybe, most people do select lifelike avatars? Except for dogeman.

Things do get a little interesting. There is one chat discussing crypto market prices and altcoins, and I see the Shiba Inu dogeman avatar strutting around like he owns the place. Is this an omen? Or a paid ad?

 

 

Shibu Inu dogeman goes walkies.

 

 

More crypto market conversations happen. Then a cigarette or marijuana sale URL Visit [insert name].com pops up in the chat. Clever guerilla marketing, I think, though perhaps not at scale, considering there are only three people in the room.

New avatars spawn next to me. A young white man morphs graphically into a white-haired black man, and then they split left and right. Weird.

 

 

Two avatars spawn, blend and split momentarily.

 

I click escape to leave the page, and suddenly, Im in a disorienting fantasy land. I teleport from place to place. I instantly recognize the Twitter and Discord logos on street signs, jolting me from the noise. Brand recognition in the Metaverse distorts my escapism, thanks to every brand trying to be there. Virtual Times Square is coming soon, I think.

Press M and you teleport to another room. Its all a bit confusing and disorienting.

So, I wander around aimlessly. There are only a few other people around, and I feel like a lost tourist without a Lonely Planet or Google Maps who cannot speak the local language. And theres no street food online. I give up and decide to hire a tour guide.

Trip 2: Reentry with a tour guide

The next time, I get a tour from Adam De Cata, head of partnerships at Decentraland.

We enter Vice Media Groups building, which is not as edgy as I expected for Vice. It has a strange post-modern architecture. I wouldve thought warehouse industrial for that once-grungy mag, perhaps.

De Cata explains the ethos of Decentraland as we wander around. The DAO was set up in 2019, and it has sold 90,000 parcels of land, which are community-owned and managed. The experiences are mostly gated, so you need a particular NFT to enter a particular building. So, its just like being on a Hollywood bus tour and not being able to see inside the celebrity-owned houses.

The tech has its challenges, but the fundamentals are truly intriguing, says De Cata. Its still in an entrepreneurial testing stage and financially driven by the degens driving it.

He says that Building in real time is the true challenge, but companies are willing to build experimental case studies.

He invites me back in a few days for Metaverse Fashion Week.

You need to see an event, he proclaims.

 

 

 

 

Metaverse Fashion Week and other adventures

I return to meet De Cata for Decentralands Metaverse Fashion Week, but he ghosts me. To be fair to him, it was not a calendar invite but a tentative virtual meet-up.

Im in. The elevator music suddenly starts randomly as I move around. The music changes from dead silence to up-tempo to heavy guitars as I battle with the keyboard, as to be expected.

I try to click on a blackjack competition but end up teleporting outside The Aquarium.

Ukraine Art Museum
Ukraine Art Museum.

I then find an empty building telling me that NFTWeek has been held. I think. So, I press escape and keep looking for Metaverse Fashion Week.

I battle with the keys to move around and wonder if Im uncoordinated cos I aint no gamer. I feel a little dizzy.

I get lost and find myself running aimlessly, but its freeing, like when you go for a jog in a new city as soon as you land and end up finding some cool local fare. You see the architecture differently than if you were riding a bus or taking an Uber.

I feel like a Smurf running from Gargamel and his cat.

The landscapes change quickly, making me feel like Im a pioneer before the hotel developers build skyscraper accommodations. I find some ancient ruins broken Greek columns in a garden somewhere.

I look at the map and jump to the Muslim Quarter, thinking its like a Metaverse version of the Old City of Jerusalem. After teleporting there, I realize nothing has been built yet, but the call to prayer rings out as I raise my volume. It truly makes me feel like a tourist somewhere exotic but familiar. However, there is no hummus.

 

 

 

Imagine if all the 90,000 plots of land get filled. How will we navigate the sites?

I spy JamminLand and think Im heading to Jamaica. The place is deserted, with a frozen bartender image behind the bar. There is no Bob Marley avatar asking me if I like jammin too. With outdoor markets, out the windows, I still get a sense of how music events in this place could pop.

I then teleport to the Ukraine War Protest Gallery. It looks like an art gallery. All the buildings seem to have that smooth virtual concrete aesthetic. The Metaverse doesnt do rustic well. It also reminds me again that this is not Disneyland. Anyone can build anything quickly this is decentralized land.

 

 

 

 

I spend two hours wandering around before I decide to actually head to Fashion Week. Somehow, I click on an event taking place live in my time zone. Time is actually a massive problem. Even in the Metaverse, we still live in different time zones. Being based in Australia, I already hate scheduling international meetings for work.

Its colorful and vibrant, and avatars abound. The proof-of-attendance tokens are all gone from the vending machine by the time I get there. I realize that this is avatar fashion week. Its a little bit like the bar scene in Mos Eisley in Star Wars.

Avatars are able to strut remarkably well. They also tend to jump a lot as they enter the runway. The poses are less Blue Steel and more Sonic the Hedgehog.

Two things: One, I made it to Fashion Week, finally. Maybe WAGMI is a prophecy? And second, only pictures can do it justice.

 

 

Metaverse Fashion Week is unusual, but thats fashion for you.

 

 

I begin to understand that Metaverse events tourism has already become a thing if you like events like avatar fashion shows and prerecorded computerized concerts, that is. Milli Vanilli, unfortunately, missed their chance for a comeback show. May Rob Pilatus rest in peace. Sorry, degens, if youre too young for the reference.

Otherwise, the Metaverse is a bit like Adelaide in South Australia. Its a lovely place without much to do.

 

 

Fashion week: Hipsters chill with the goths. Just like high school?

 

 

Next stop: The Museum of Crypto Art

Lets just say it: For art NFTs, a Metaverse museum makes a lot of sense. Its just the vibe.

The Museum of Crypto Art is not subject to the laws of gravity, physics or modern engineering. Staircases can be majestic, even if not mathematically load-bearing.

 

MoCA: Staircase has an Escher approach to engineering.

 

 

Theres a lot of art on each wall.

The museum uses a token to give its community members a say in the projects direction as part-owners and co-curators. It declares on its website that its earliest acquisitions will represent the earliest etchings on the blockchain, and will come to be regarded as the digital cave paintings of our transhumanist narrative.

As an art fan, its hard to find a context for art NFTs. Theres no time period or a genre to use as a reference point. Luckily, Im given a guided tour by its co-founder Colborn Bell. He explains each piece and why he is documenting NFT history.

Bell first sought to build a collection in 2017 and is now the largest collector on the NFT sales platform SuperRare. He was an investor in Decentralands 2017 ICO, but his gallery was built on Somnium Space, which has nice light and shadows and is not as cartoony as its competitors Cryptovoxels and Decentraland. Bell can configure an exhibition in a couple of hours, for free.

Lots of art on a wall
Theres lots of art on the walls.

Having a tour guide in the NFT space right now helps. Bell is a patron documenting crypto history. Without his curation, I would be lost as to why one piece is valued over another.

Cryptoland loves a meme, and some works relate to the earliest history in the space, like the Bitcoin volatility clock piece. There are 350 pieces in total, going for an average price of $300, but only 50 pieces are on display.

Seeing NFTs on a virtual wall is still strange to me, as art is usually fixed in size and hung on a real wall based on that size. Small paintings are cute in a nook, for example. But as I noted when I tried to value NFT clones, the art is in the code and the curation of the collection.

So, I ask my tour guide, What is art?

His take is honest and crypto-native.

Out the gate, a lot of NFTs arent art. They are really not. I look to the fringe for art, as in the existing art movement and art market already gate-kept. I want that piece by a queer artist in Kenya depicting two women kissing in a field of flowers.

Hes referring to an actual piece in his collection. I dont have an investment thesis, he adds. I like validating artists.

He says that art NFTs are familiar but also have elements of the surreal. Famed project CryptoPunks gave Bell a terrible first impression, he says. Pranksy built the market, and he was a notorious scammer. (Lawyers, note: Magazine is not suggesting Pranksy really is a scammer, notorious or otherwise.) Bell bought his first Punk relatively late, after Christies auctioned Alien Punks in mid-2021. Bell also notes that Pak, another famed NFT artist, is good at social manipulation, not art.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

So, the Museum of Crypto Art is not about the art? Apparently, its more about patronage.

If it all [the value of the collection] went to zero tomorrow, I wouldnt care. Ive built friends all over the world. What was important to me was the growth of cryptocurrencies and bringing in creatives to the space. We already had devs and programmers.

For me, the gallery is a great tourist destination because it houses NFT artworks. It has digital works exhibited appropriately. I accept the glitches, like the time it takes to load pages, and the distracting ID numbers across my avatar detracting from the art.

Events and attractions work well in the Metaverse

There will be a Lonely Planet for the Metaverse. Do not let its current pixelated state fool you.

Events and attractions work well in the Metaverse. But for now, its like throwing goo against a wall. Some things will stick.

Every tennis ball avatar still walking around in Decentraland is a reminder of the success of the 2022 Australian Opens Metaverse activations. Fans could actually watch real live tennis from the Metaverse.

 

 

Australian Open 2022 in the Metaverse: Tennis ball image.

 

 

Im still hungry, and virtual coffee has no caffeine. Real beers have alcohol. So, I depart for the real world with a final thought:

Perhaps the Metaverse is like crypto in 2011: You just have to believe and hodl.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

DeSci: Can crypto improve scientific research?

An insider account of the DeSci origins story a new movement of citizen scientists, open-access scientific research and crowd-sourced peer-review funded by crypto thats gathering pace in 2022.

#

At ETHDenver in February, decentralized science became a thing.

It was like the good old days of crypto: Like-minded spirits met and then crashed at each others rented places. Ideologies and open research were respectfully debated. DeSci panels were well attended with renewed energy for figuring out hard problems. Heated discussions were had. Many committed themselves to decentralized science, whatever that would mean. DeSci is, of course, very new and untested.

This could well be the first insider account of the DeSci origin story. Think Peter Parker citizen scientists funded by crypto.

Decentralized science?

Research is hard and problematically peer-reviewed. Commercializing science and tech is complex and often not profitable. Intellectual property protection is time-consuming. So, scientific research isnt rife with speculators, rent-seekers and low-hanging fruit like other parts of Cryptoland.

The newly coined DeSci is about championing true decentralization, rejecting institutional influence (read big pharma, and the peer review system) and encouraging citizen science in pursuit of truth.

COVID-19 has spurred its development. The speed at which multiple COVID-19 vaccines and endless studies were delivered was a pivotal moment. If COVID-19 research could be produced that quickly, why couldnt decentralized movements do it too?

Could crypto, tokenomics and decentralized autonomous organizations play a role in new models of research and commercialization?

This is a story of a band of committed activists who want to make that happen, one of whom is Erik Van Winkle who grew up wanting to be a scientist, had a core role at ConstitutionDAO, and has now found his sweet spot as a community organizer for DeSci Labs a project working on new technologies to improve the accessibility, reliability, transparency, and value sharing of scientific publications, as well as the DeSci Foundation.

He says the mission is broadly Can we make science more efficient? and while it wont happen overnight, it will happen:

DeSci is possible it just has a long road ahead of it. Blockchain took time; DeFi took time. DeSci will get there.

He adds its already attracting some of the best minds.

People are excited to be there; they are excited by the mission. Attracting developers is very hard. This is an area that has a good story behind it.

Building upon existing science

According to a recent article by Sarah Hamburg, co-founder of Web3 advisory Phas3 and blockchain-based biometric data company Lynx, DeSci lies at the intersection of two broader trends.

1) Efforts within the scientific community to change how research is funded and knowledge is shared, and 2) efforts within the crypto-focused movement to shift ownership and value away from industry intermediaries.

DeSci communities are expected to be largely made up of those already involved in both crypto and science. How they interact with the wider scientific community is key.

Most DeSci advocates are keen to respect existing research communities while harmoniously building new ones. This reflects an important slogan for the DeSci movement, best summed up by Hamburg in a letter to Nature encouraging scientists across all disciplines to join DeSci.

Dont work against us join us.

 

 

DeSci Foundation
The DeSci Foundation is one of the leading organizations in this new sector. Source: DeSci Foundation

 

 

Hippocratic Oath for DeSci?

Josh Bate has become a high-profile figure in the burgeoning DeSci space. A community organizer with high visibility, he agrees ETHDenver was a catalyst for DeSci.

Bate, a DeFi guy who was once the head of community for the Free Julian Assange campaign and began in crypto by using Bitcoin just for buying things on the dark web. Hes pretty forthright when he talks. How did he earn his position of visibility in the community? Just put myself about, he says.

Bate founded and funds DeSci World, a peer-to-peer research platform, and a DeSci aggregator of info. It aims to create a dashboard akin to DeFi Pulse for DeSci.

He also believes DeFi practices are crucial to DeSci business models, but DeSci needs more than Web3 tooling to improve on the current state of affairs.

He tells Magazine that he fears a dark DeSci and a regular DeSci, so hes been campaigning for a Hippocratic Oath for DeSci. He made the case at a talk at ETHDenver:

Its so early, but we can choose a Hippocratic Oath for DeSci now no institutional finance, just pure science. He asked the crowd for a show of hands on whether DeSci should have an explicitly stated ideology and estimates that maybe 5% voted no, 20% yes, and the rest were too confused by the many variables and held out to see the outcome.

How to peer review as a decentralized public good

Lets jump back a step to consider the complex problems with existing research models.

Theres a need to improve:

  1. Research funding
  2. Open access to research
  3. Overhaul the academic peer-review process.

Of course, theres no proof that grafting crypto onto this process is the best way to improve it. Is creating a coin around a research project a good way to fund it? What do holders of that token get out of it? Is it more out of altruism than a financial return?

LabDAO is an open community of wet and dry labs for citizen science. Founder Niklas Rindtorff tells Magazine that tokenomics cant directly change research.

But tokenomics can generate new mechanism design and incentives. In a time where most academic research is following the same set of incentives, I am hopeful new funding agencies and tokenomics models can help diversify the ways research is being done.

 

 

DeSci
Artists impression of the DeSci Future.

 

1. Crowdsourcing research funding

Funding is the bane of scientists existence, and the process does not always reward merit. Scientists waste a lot of time writing grants applications. Hamburg wrote:

Funding is an especially acute pain point for scientists, who spend up to half their time writing grant proposals. Success in getting funding is heavily tied to metrics such as the h-index, which quantifies the impact of a scientists published work. The resulting pressure to publish or perish incentivizes the pursuit of novel research over work thats critical but less likely to grab headlines. Ultimately, inadequate and unreliable funding not only reduces the amount of science being done, but also biases which projects scientists choose, contributing to issues such as the replication crisis.

The replication crisis means that the results of perhaps more than 50% of published studies cannot be replicated by other scientists carrying out the same experiments or research.

Passion projects
DeSci can help mobilize those most affected and motivated to contribute to research to help improve their lives.

DeSci proponents argue that funding gatekeepers hinder scientific progress. Hamburg, a neuroscientist who has researched innovative ways of treating Alzheimers by using light known as entrainment, explains to Magazine that funding bodies are too slow for innovative therapeutics. She was building a phone app for entrainment treatments but ran out of funding. She still believes the trial would have proved fruitful for treating Alzheimers.

In addition, traditional funding mechanisms arent great for new and different research approaches.

For example, DeSci will unleash the growth of digital therapeutics [wearable biometric devices], which will enable large numbers of people across many different locations to participate in digital-based studies and pool their data, she argues. DeSci trials could be done with fewer biases and better-pooled data on a blockchain.

Like the open-source nature of AI research, Hamburg suggests that medicine of the future will be algorithms in one way or another. Pooled data will be very important for generating new insights.

Thats the vision. The question is whether the decentralized science movement has the capabilities to better decide what should or shouldnt be funded.

How do you conduct peer-reviewed research and collaborate with the harmoniously scientific community? Will DeSci crowdsource both the funding and the peer review, or does it just fund the research and get out of the way? For now, experimentation may be the only option.

SCINET.io co-founder Kaitlin Cauchon believes DeScis success is inevitable because the current academic funding model is broken.

How to get scientists on board the DeSci train? Democratize funding. Funding is the biggest centralization of science.

SCINET is an early-stage project that is currently focused on building a decentralized crowdfunding platform for life sciences research. Once done, they will turn their attention to an electronic lab notebook built on on-chain, according to Cauchon. Open access and replicability are the problems they seek to solve

 

 

DeScie events
DeSci events are now highly visible in 2022, and female representation is unusually strong for Cryptoland.

 

 

2. Open access for citizen science

Information access is another big problem for science today, Hamburg noted in her article.

Despite the fact that science is the epitome of a global public good, a lot of scientific knowledge is trapped behind journal paywalls and inside private databases. Making all types of data more accessible is the main objective of the Open Science movement, which emerged over a decade ago.

Peer review is slow and anonymous, and this can lead to turf wars as journals are gatekeepers of knowledge. (FYI, see this 2018 review of the peer review system.) Two major players are Clarivate and Elsevier, who are the Web2 equivalents of academic research. Scientific journals are an oligopoly of for-profit companies. Articles are protected by copyright.

The two leading business models of journal publication companies are pay-for-access and pay-for-publication. Even for independent observers, this does seem like a perversion of incentives.

In recent years, preprint platforms Arxiv, bioRxiv, medRxivand SSRN have allowed academics to post early versions of their manuscripts online and have emerged and found favor. However, this is prior to the peer review process, and academics may not divulge key findings at this stage

The problem is clear: paywalled science. And the benefits of fixing the problem are even starker.

Citizen science

Hamburg, who has had a chronic pain condition called fibromyalgia since she was 19 and long COVID over the past two years, believes that by making research more available, DeSci can crowdsource ordinary people working together to help solve problems, especially those affected by an illness who are the most motivated.

With many chronic conditions, theres a strong biohacker mentality that emerges, as people are left to track flare-ups and the impact of interventions themselves, with inadequate know-how and tools to do so. There is very little crossover (if any) between these citizen science experiments and traditional science and medicine, so insights are missed, and many illnesses remain under-researched despite the millions they impact worldwide.

 

 

DeSci research
DeSci Labs plans to store research on ledgers and to chip away at the reproducibility crisis.

 



DeSci Labs is working to create a ledger of scientific records that stores and validates manuscripts, data and code in a transparent way that is accessible to everyone.

Making science truly open involves transforming science from solitary PDFs into dynamic research objects. We plan to showcase our first product, DeSci Nodes, at the DeSci Day on April 20 in Amsterdam to demonstrate how a pre-print can be turned into a reproducible research object stored on IPFS containing data, code and video to evidence work and chip away at the reproducibility crisis, Van Winkle tells Magazine.

One innovative approach that might improve open access is being taken by the Smart Contract Research Forum. Its a community for industry and researchers to share research and peer reviews that is decoupling review from publication.

Operations leader Eugene Leventhal tells Magazine, Today, peer review is only available for those vying for those coveted journals and conferences. The majority of the Web3 space, with the exception of the underlying cryptographic primitives, has mostly been built outside of academia, and most researchers publish more on their blogs and Twitter than in traditional venues.

Thats why we think its important to start a series of open peer review experiments supporting independent researchers in the space, and were starting to coordinate with meta-science researchers to ensure that were not re-inventing the wheel with our experimentation.

They will announce their plans for 2022 at ETHAmsterdam on April 20.

So, more open and pooled data is one key to more research from concerned citizens. But should tokenomics mean that reproduction of data sets along with all research data is incentivized?

 

 

 

3. Overhaul the academic peer review process

Patrick Joyce worked at a tumor biology lab at the famed Johns Hopkins University. He also dropped out of med school and a Ph.D. program working on molecular biology.

Hes far from the only person who tells me that good science isnt always super citable. This creates weird perverse incentives driven by money flowing from citations.

He adds, Higher prestige journals lead to better citations. But paywalls mean the world cant benefit in real-time.

In 2016, before Joyce discovered crypto, he decided to build a Reddit-like platform for science called Knowledgr. Coinbase founder Brian Armstrong invested in his company, but the project soon sputtered out. Joyce then joined Armstrongs ResearchHub a sort-of GitHub for science, with utility behind the paper in 2020 as chief science officer.

ResearchHub is a good example of where DeSci may be heading. ResearchHub has hired 60 editors, he says, people who are qualified to review scientific papers.” Its really an economies-of-scale issue, enough editors and support, and the reviews will be almost universally respected. Its currently on the hunt for preprints or draft research manuscripts to receive peer reviews.

ResearchHub isnt trying to conduct research, but to create a platform for independent science. The editors are paid in ResearchCoin, which essentially equates to governance rights on the platform.

Like open source, we hope to tear down the Ivory tower so a barefoot biochemist in Yugoslavia can unlock clever science.

They recently added digital object identifier (DOI) citations to papers to help integrate ResearchHub with existing research models. DOIs aid researchers to find original references.

Joyce says the project started as a pure DAO, but that didnt work out. It is still kind of a DAO but more CEO-run. Its hard to organize people. We had to carefully delineate what the DAOs should decide. For example, should we ban a eugenics hub? that question goes to the DAO.

But he adds in DeSci, Now theres an expectation that youre a DAO.

 

 

 

 

DAOs are crucial to DeScis moment

In the wake of ETHDenver, new DeSci DAOs have been emerging almost weekly.

The fledgling stdDAOs mission is to fund sexually transmitted disease research in the hopes of finding cures. The founders are crypto people remaining anonymous, as everyone in the DAO has personally contracted an STD all of them know someone who has a more serious STD.

Founder CarmenCrypto says they seek to get access to the industry outside of big pharma. They are looking for cures, and not just another side effect treatment, which are what is only available on the market today. They plan to first focus on STDs, such as herpes simplex types 1 (cold sores) and 2 (genital) and to further gene editing and stem cell research.

We run the business, the DAO; outside specialists will help us with the research. The DAO can be cross-border, can move funds, can cut across projects.

They have in-kind goodwill from lawyers, finance pros and charities all willing to help (and everyone has crypto skills).

Being an anonymous DAO is well suited to the cause of No one is shamed by saying they have cancer, but, unfortunately, they still are when it comes to STDs.

Side-stepping United States clinical trial regulations, they want to fund research wherever scientists and researchers may be.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

They are also looking to capitalize on existing open research. CarmenCrypto says the DAO is looking for highly knowledgeable professionals, such as doctors, scientists, researchers, philanthropists and entrepreneurs, to help provide insight to our community on innovative medical techniques with a high potential to cure STDs that stdDAO should fund.

Its very new, and very experimental. Are decentralized clinical trials even possible, or ethical? Its so early that tokenomics design is still a vague high-level discussion.

 

 

 

 

Tokenized science is still evolving

Despite the enthusiasm, the path to tokenizing science may be slow, says DeSci Labs co-founder Professor Philipp Koellinger, adding:

Its too early for a tokenomics model of science. Most scientists are risk-averse and not familiar with Web3 yet. Tokenomic models for DeSci must be very well thought through and, ideally, developed together with and tested by the scientific community to gain widespread adoption and acceptance. It is glaringly obvious to most scientists that the current incentive system is misaligned with the purpose of science. The possibility for incentive design is one of the most powerful features of Web3 technologies. If done well, it could solve a lot of problems in science. Give it some time.

DeSci Labs believes that a decentralized peer review system can be achieved by autonomous research communities of the best researchers in every field, who are incentivized and rewarded for providing open, timely, and high-quality peer review and who select the most important contributions to be highlighted in a transparent way.

This would be a dramatic improvement on the current practice of closed-door peer reviews of journals that rely on unpaid time of scientists, which is haunted by collusion, gate-keeping and bias.

DeScis breakout moment in Amsterdam?

Renee Davis is another who was inspired by ETHDenver. She asked Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin at the event what the top five research problems were facing DeSci.

Of the five Buterin stated, four of them are already being worked on by the community, she says, listing onboarding, governance protocols, token distribution and decentralized identity systems.

Im so glad I went to ETHDenver, she says, adding, My ROI was massive from bonding with the DeSci community.

She quit Deloitte consulting to join BanklessDAO and then founded the Journal of Decentralized Work, an open-source journal for the study of DAOs and delegated tokenomic research and TalentDAO.

TalentDAO is trying to create a new science of DAOs, helping to make sure DAOs dont fail. It has partnered with Arweave and Ocean Protocol.

At ETHAmsterdam, part of Devconnect Amsterdam, DeSci Day will take place on April 20. Itll give the community a chance to see how far DeSci has progressed since ETHDenver in February. Davis, for one, thinks its progressing in leaps and bounds, and the sky is the limit.

Crypto disrupted finance; NFTs disrupted culture; and DeSCi will disrupt knowledge in the next 1224 months.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Satoshi may have needed an alias, but can we say the same?

To doxx (oneself) or not to doxx? That is a question faced by many operating in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, including developers, influencers, and investors. Does one use ones own name when venturing into the often chaotic and largely unregulated crypto world or don an alias?

Consider Embrik Brresen, developer of RobinHood Inu a reflection token that was launched in February. Like many crypto and blockchain founders, he considered using a nom de guerre when starting out. But Brresen, 22, raised in a small town, had also served in the Norwegian military where he says he learned some lessons about the value of trust.

So, when it came time to launch his new coin project, he opted to use his real name. For me, it is the moral thing to present yourself as who you are, he tells Magazine. Many of his peers disagree, however. Pseudo-anonymity has been a fixture of the internet since it began, and I believe it will remain this way, Ghostbro, a Generation Z developer for the DogeBonk project, tells Magazine. For Ghostbro (a pseudonym), revealing their true identity or doxxing themselves makes little sense.

It would essentially put a target on my back to people who might have lost money trading DogeBonk, or wish to steal from me either online or by actually coming to my house and threatening me or my loved ones.

They have already received threatening messages, they tell Magazine, and have been subject to some extremely obsessive behavior from people who genuinely hate our cryptocurrency. Theyre in no rush to make themselves a flesh and blood figurehead these people can mess with.

It is a debate that has been going on in at least some form since cryptos beginning: To what extent does one really need to reveal ones personal identity in a decentralized world? After all, ones transactions are already on display in the form of a public key for any and all to see. Does one really need to put a bullseye on ones chest, too? Moreover, arent assumed names a part of the crypto ethos going back to Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto who assumed an alias that has never been penetrated?

Has it gone too far?

It may seem that pseudonymity just comes with the turf in the cryptoverse. How many influencers on Crypto Twitter use assumed names e.g., PlanB, Cobie, The Crypto Dog, Rekt Capital? Twitter personality Cobie is actually on their second handle until 2021, they went as Crypto Cobain.

But pseudonymity arguably has some social and economic costs. It can provide cover to rug pullers, fraudsters, money launderers and other less-than-trustworthy types. This was nakedly displayed in the recent Wonderland saga where it was revealed that one of the founders of that DeFi protocol, going by the alias Sifu, was actually Michael Patryn, a convicted felon and co-founder of QuadrigaCX, the Canadian crypto exchange, whose collapse under murky circumstances led to a loss of $169 million in user funds.

While the crypto space today has become safer and more user-friendly as it approaches mainstream acceptance, many still believe that anonymous scammers run rampant.

 

 

 

 

This pseudonymous stuff is so dangerous, Brian Nguyen, a crypto entrepreneur who lost $470,000 in what might have been a crypto rug pull, told CNBC.com. They could be a good actor today, but they could turn bad in two or three years.

It makes one wonder what theyre hiding from.

Maybe its time then to rethink this pseudo-anonymity thing? If we want crypto to be taken seriously as a community, then we must start unveiling identities, Hadar Jabotinsky, a research fellow at the Hadar Jabotinsky Center for Interdisciplinary Research of Financial Markets, Crises and Technology, tells Magazine. It is important because this remains a new, unregulated market, Jabotinsky continues. Its based on trust, but it is subject to rumors so, its beneficial to use real names.

 

 

 

 

Failure to supply ones true name is traditionally a cause for suspicion, and it remains so still in many quarters. If people must be anonymous, it makes one wonder what theyre hiding from, University of Texas finance professor John Griffin tells Magazine. Meanwhile, Brresen adds, If someone asks about a person, and they are unable or unwilling to answer, a lot of the time, that indicates some murkiness in what is being presented, even if it is not an outright scam.

Yes, some project founders choose anonymity to further their fraudulent activities, acknowledges Amy Wu, a well-known venture capitalist who was recently named to head FTX Ventures a $2-billion VC fund to invest in Web3 projects tells Magazine, but this is a tiny percentage of crypto founders. Still, when they succeed i.e., execute a scam or rug pull it tends to anger many inside as well as outside the community, she says.

 

 

 

 

And then what is one to make of the Wonderland fiasco? A serial scammer who had served 18 months in a federal prison for credit card fraud, Patryn (Sifu) was serving as Wonderlands treasurer. The lesson is you have to assume the worst, Aaron Lammer, DeFi specialist at Radkl, tells Magazine.

Even if most people are well-intentioned in their anonymity, you may be masking a very bad actor.

Part of the ethos

Asked why many crypto influencers, traders and developers post anonymously on Twitter and other social media, Lammer answers that each has their distinct rationale. For developers and project founders, anonymity can be a shield against regulatory uncertainty. For traders and influencers, there may be security risks. Anonymity is part of the ethos of crypto culture, and I dont necessarily think that people need to justify it.

Still, as more institutional investors enter the crypto space and the deals get bigger, anonymity if not pseudonymity may lose some of its attractiveness. If one seeks to raise financing from a venture capital firm, it probably wouldnt help if you go by the handle Loves2party420, Justin Hartzman, CEO and co-founder of Toronto-based cryptocurrency exchange CoinSmart, tells Magazine, adding:

If you are running a multi-million-dollar protocol, its not wise to remain anonymous. You need to be visible to ensure that you wont suddenly rug-pull and get away with it.

A lot of VC firms wont invest in a project if the founder remains anonymous, adds Wu, but there are situations where the founder chooses to be publicly anonymous maybe to keep with the Web3s spirit of egalitarianism but the founder is still known by name by those within the more narrow investing community, including the enabling VC firm.

Losing credibility?

Is it even right to assume that one loses credibility when adopting an alias? Cant one build a trustworthy brand around a nom de plume? Did it do lasting harm to Eric Blair (George Orwell), Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain), Mary Anne Evans (George Eliot), or Theodore Geisel (Dr. Seuss), to name a few? When peoples line of work becomes wrapped up in a pseudonym, then maintaining credibility there becomes just as important as maintaining credibility with their real name, says Ghostbro.

Moreover, in the internet age, peoples behavior isnt always exemplary, particularly online. The majority of my adult [survey] participants use pseudonyms on social media to avoid scorn from those who might deem their behavior unacceptable, both within and outside of fan communities, notes social media researcher Ysabel Gerrard.

And if pseudonyms help to promote a more democratic spirit, is that necessarily a bad thing? Decentralized project founders often want to downplay their roles, Wu tells Magazine, They dont want to let their personality get in the way of the community. They often prefer to be seen as just another member in a dynamic, new community, and to this end, a pseudonym can help.

You can still build up a reputation without revealing your identity, Samson Mow, CEO of Pixelmatic and formerly chief strategy officer of Blockstream, tells Magazine, continuing, and you can also accomplish and have a great impact on the world, as Satoshi Nakamoto demonstrated. Ideas and code are more important than a name and face.

Allowed to repeat the same fraud?

On the other hand, its difficult to deny that some scam artists are able to hide behind anonymity in order to repeat the same or different scams repeatedly, Griffin adds. A ton of this goes on in crypto.

Meanwhile, Jabotinsky, who has studied financial failures in traditional markets, adds that anonymity can lead to all manner of market failures, given the asymmetricity of information in the crypto world. It facilitates pump-and-dump schemes, for instance, and other sorts of manipulation.

Then, too, scale matters when playing around with avatars and the like. When you are at a certain level with a corporate treasury holding $1 billion, say it is important for you to be visible for people to know exactly who they are dealing with, says Hartzman.

 

 

 

 

Still, viewed objectively, the amount of fraud in the crypto world is really quite small, Wu notes, and the number of really big projects unicorns that have reached $1 billion in market value while growing fast, are still relatively rare. These circumstances dont really describe the everyday reality of most projects where pseudonymity might bring useful benefits for the everyday developer or founder, as well as influencers and investors.

Dealing with complaints is tiresome, after all, and investors have been known to lash out when startups falter or fail. If you are a protocol creator working 20 hours a day, do you really want to waste time and energy dealing with these complaints and, possibly worse, death threats? asks Hartzman.

Depending on ones line of work, anonymity could be a wise choice, Hartzman adds. Case in point is Zachxbt, the alias of the investigator who exposed the SifuWonderland deception. A figure like that probably gets [serious] death threats, said Hartzman. Being anon can be a matter of life and death for someone holding that kind of information.

 

 

 

 

Protection from regulators

Some founders, too, worry that regulators in their country of origin might come after them at some point another reason to mask their identity. Canadas recent executive order with regard to the Ottawa truckers got some people thinking.

With governments, you really never can tell whats going to happen, Mow tells Magazine. Maintaining an alias and a low profile can certainly help lower the chances of seizure of assets you never know when therell be another Executive Order 6102. If Canada can freeze the accounts of peaceful protesters, then asset seizures in any advanced Western nation is possible.

Even Brresen, a believer in radical transparency, is sympathetic toward his many peers who have elected to mask their identities. I mainly think they are afraid of being targeted personally, either to protect themselves and their family from being targeted online or in real life. He can even foresee doxxing himself one day. For instance:

If RobinHood Inu really takes off, and, say, 10,000 people were aware of me as an individual, this would naturally alter how I interact online. If I was to invest in another project and attaching my name to it would affect it, then I would likely do so anonymously.

Then, too, the blockchain world really might be a special case given the public nature of its transactions. In traditional finance, people are open about their identities, but the route that money takes is often murky, notes Brresen. Whereas, In crypto, there is a lot of anonymity of individuals, but every transaction is traceable.

Ghostbro believes that many people in the sector will continue to maintain a Chinese wall between their online persona and their IRL (in real life) persona, while Lammer goes even further: Pseudonymity isnt just situational it is the wave of the future. Crypto is probably ahead of the curve, and more of the world will operate anonymously in the future.

Hartzman differs. Its more likely that a convergence is taking place. Times have changed, he tells Magazine. As things stand, crypto businesses need to work hand-in-hand with regulators to ensure consistent and sustainable, widespread adoption.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Visibility is the cornerstone of accountability, Hartzman concludes, while Brresen, for his part, adds that as decentralized finance becomes more readily available, widespread and accepted, the perceived need for anonymity will likely lessen.

Then again, some things dont really change. Identities and reputation have mattered throughout human history, and as Griffin notes, People typically want to know who theyre dealing with. They value relationships, too, and its hard to have a deep relationship when people are anonymous.

Meanwhile, the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry is maturing, becoming more regulated, and attracting more users from outside the tech community who may not understand some of its more colorful traditions. Also, as more large corporations and institutional investors enter the space, some with fiduciary responsibilities, it might be only inevitable that the sectors love affair with avatars and assumed names wanes.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

The FBI’s takedown of Virgil Griffith for breaking sanctions, firsthand

Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith took a plea deal after breaking sanctions against North Korea and was formally sentenced earlier today the final chapter in a two-year journey as bizarre as it is shocking.

Journalist Ethan Lou, author of Once a Bitcoin Miner, attended the infamous event in North Korea at which Griffith spoke. He was asked to submit a statement for Griffiths sentencing, although that statement was ultimately not filed with the court. Here he tells the inside story of what happened.

 

Pyongyang, April 18, 2019

Virgil Griffith had been on North Korean soil for only a few hours when he casually told fellow travelers and their local guides that his trip was unsanctioned. Unique in the world, the United States bans its citizens from going to North Korea without explicit permission.

Griffith, an American in Singapore working for the Ethereum Foundation, had sought such permission unsuccessfully, he recounted at the round dinner table at Pyongyangs riverside Pothonggang Hotel. Griffith had made his case the best he could on why he should go to that Pyongyang cryptocurrency conference in 2019 but was denied. And so, he decided to go anyway, he told people at the table.

 

 

Virgil in North Korea
An image submitted by prosecutors in a New York court shows Virgil Griffith explaining cryptocurrency in North Korea in April 2019. The words No Sanctions! are highlighted in a detail box. Source: U.S. Department of Justice

 

Up and at them

Four days later, in a building shaped like an atom, Griffith told a crowd of North Koreans how they could harness blockchain in negotiations with the United States. At the time, bilateral talks had been bogged down by the question of which measure should be unwound first: the United States economic sanctions or North Koreas nuclear program.

Griffith said both could happen simultaneously through a smart contract tied to a North Korean missile.

If all the news reports say that sanctions on North Korea have been lifted, the missile will deactivate.

Then, when explaining how smart contracts work, Griffith used the idea to shave my cat as an example. His presentations were mostly speculative, farfetched and based on publicly available information. Its unclear how serious he was he certainly had not taken the U.S. governments opposition to his trip seriously.

 

 

 

 

Unsanctioned

Griffith believed in being forthright, even if it was uncomfortable. Almost immediately after returning to Singapore, Griffith went to the local U.S. embassy to talk about the trip with a special agent. Perhaps, in some way, he thought he was doing his government a favor by telling them all about the cloistered kingdom. Griffith did not expect that meeting to ripple throughout the U.S. government, but Special Agent Brandon Cavanaugh of the Federal Bureau of Investigations counterintelligence unit in New York was soon brought into the fold, and then the circle grew to three lawyers from the Justice Department plus Treasury Department attorneys. On Thanksgiving of 2019, Griffith was arrested in Los Angeles.

Accused of helping North Korea bypass sanctions by teaching it about blockchain, Griffith ultimately accepted a plea deal for 63 months in prison and was sentenced in April 2022.

It was the final chapter in a two-year journey as confusing as it was shocking the story of how an adventuresome utopian and his North Korean trip had come to disturb the merciless forces of geopolitics and national security.

Griffith, through his lawyers, did not respond to an interview request, but documents filed with the court paint a vivid picture of the days following the trip and the decisions and moves made then a crucial, illuminating period during which FBI agents as much went after Griffith as he fell into their lap.

 

 

Virgil in NK
Day 6. At the conference. From inside the building looking out. This monument here is of a pen and then theres an atom on top, symbolizing science and writing and stuff. Source: Ethan Lou on Twitter

 

Internet Man of Mystery

Griffith was born in Birmingham, Alabama in 1983. He has unruly hair that would later make the North Korean restaurant servers describe his head as big. In 2008, a little before Bitcoin first came into the world, Griffith, a hacker, was profiled by The New York Times Magazine and dubbed the Internet Man of Mystery.

He once suspended his doctorate studies to participate in the reality show King of the Nerds. He was also taken to court after planning to publicly unveil security flaws in campus identity cards, a matter later privately settled. In Griffiths words, he is someone who likes to poke the proverbial bear. He once told his parents, I regularly roll grenades into the room, and someone needs to really jump on it. A friend described him as viewing life as a video game.

In May 2019, about a month after Griffith met the State Department agent in Singapore, the FBI reached out. Griffith was visiting friends in Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory that had become a bit of a crypto hub, where he had rented a small apartment. The FBI told Griffith it wanted a meeting.

Griffith agreed immediately. He had little sense of any danger to himself. He did not hire a lawyer and traveled to New York at his own expense. Among the FBI employees he would meet was Special Agent Cavanaugh.

 

 

Day 4. We went up some really high tower. Virgil called North Korea a Wes Anderson movie. I thought that was very clever. Source: Ethan Lou on Twitter

 

 

Plead the Fifth

Griffith showed the agents photographs of himself in North Korea and provided to the FBI propaganda he had taken home as souvenirs, including newspapers and other literature. Visually, Pyongyang had been eye-opening for Griffith, with the pastel colors of its apartment buildings evoking, in his view, a Wes Anderson movie.

North Koreas insular culture fascinated Griffith so much that he got a tailored Mao-style suit. Much of the countrys literature was also unintentionally funny. One newspaper headline Griffith saw in North Korea read, unironically, Institute for women set up under the care of great men. A coffee-table book he brought back used the Comic Sans font. Griffith treasured his North Korean souvenirs to such an extent that he sent them to the nonprofit Internet Archive to be digitized.

However, what the government saw in the material Griffith brought from North Korea was starkly different. Michael Krouse, a Justice Department lawyer and former U.S. Marine, would later take note of Griffiths Mao suit and, together with his colleagues, observe that Griffith dressed in a North Korean military-style uniform.

For Special Agent Cavanaugh, the gist of his takeaway from that May meeting was that Griffith knew that going to North Korea to teach blockchain was illegal but did so anyway, intended to do so again, and wanted to make a symbolic cryptocurrency transfer between North and South Korea. Cavanaugh was not going to let that go.

 

 

Virgil in NK
The North Korean suit was not a good look, either in a fashion sense or in court. Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Better get a lawyer, son

On Nov. 12, Griffith was on a business trip in Northern California. The FBI reached out again, and Griffith and Cavanaugh once more found themselves in the same room, this time at the FBIs San Francisco field office. Griffith had gotten a little spooked from his last meeting, but he again did not hire a lawyer. And this time, Griffith also gave the FBI permission to search his phone.

Griffiths decisions may seem baffling. Before one of those FBI meetings, he talked about it with his friend Eric Corley, an editor for a hacker magazine, for whom he once wrote. In his recollections, Corley said he tried to dissuade Griffith from going: I kept warning him it was a trap.

But Griffith insisted on going to the FBI and telling the truth without a lawyer, Corley said. The presentation Griffith had given in North Korea amounted to no more than publicly available information, he thought. He did not believe he had done anything wrong. Shortly after that meeting, Griffith was convinced they totally got where he was coming from, Corley said. He called Griffiths sentiment ironic.

 

 

 

 

North Korea, accused of rampant human rights violations and pursuing nuclear weapons against the international order, has long been under a blanket of economic sanctions, often led by the United States. Those sanctions punish North Korea economically by barring it from international trade, which the U.S. is able to do because it effectively controls the global financial infrastructure. Cryptocurrency is theoretically a way for North Korea to get around that. After all, the country has already been accused of hacking and stealing hundreds of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency. Griffiths visit had set off all manner of red flags within the U.S. government.

After Griffiths San Francisco meeting with the FBI, Justice Department officials in New York worked hard to build a case against him. It was not without its challenges, and the matter came to a head a little after midday on Nov. 18. Another Justice Department lawyer, Kyle Wirshba a Harvard Law School graduate with a gentle voice learned that the Department of the Treasury had issues with the case. The departments Office of Foreign Assets Control said it was a gray area because it might not be illegal if Griffiths presentation in North Korea was general information and not tailored for the audience.

Did the Justice Department know the specific nature of Griffiths presentation? That information became urgent and vital. If the matter went to trial, a Treasury Department expert would need to testify to support the charges. That afternoon, Wirshba posed that question to the FBIs Special Agent Cavanaugh. He also wrote to his fellow lawyer Krouse, telling him about another government official: So, of course, the deputy chief has problems.

 

 

 

 

Around this time, the Justice Department faced another issue: The gravity of the matter had finally dawned on Griffith. He knew that he had told the FBI that North Korean attendees left the conference with a better understanding of cryptocurrency than when they arrived, that he had acknowledged that his talk amounted to a non-zero tech transfer, and that Cavanaugh, perhaps, did not really believe him when he said he only talked about publicly available information. Around this time, Griffith hired a lawyer.

So, if Griffith were no longer going to cooperate with the authorities, perhaps he would run? The FBI deemed Griffith a flight risk and needed to arrest him quickly. The bureau told Griffith not to leave the country, but Griffith was under no obligation to comply. And without the Treasury Departments support, there was no justification to detain him. The case no longer appeared so easy.

On Nov. 18, the same day that Wirshba learned of the Treasury Departments concerns, a busy afternoon unfolded at the Justice Department. By 8:00 pm, it had bugged a lawyer from the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control too many times. In an email to his colleagues that night, Cavanaugh said: DOJ asked us to hang on reaching out to the OFAC. Apparently, one or more people have already reached out [] and hes becoming frustrated. Just wanted you to be aware of the sensitivity.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Dont skip town

Depending on your perspective, the Justice Department either thought too little or too much of Griffith. As he was based in Singapore, he had not made arrangements to be in the United States beyond that business trip to Northern California. He also knew unequivocally by then that the law was after him. But Griffith complied with the FBIs request that he not leave the country.

He stayed with friends in Los Angeles and also decided to spend Thanksgiving with his parents and sisters family in Baltimore. He told the authorities of those travel plans and sent his itinerary through his lawyer to ensure they knew where he was and that he was not trying to run away.

Griffith still believed in doing the right thing and that it was important to have demonstrated that he tried to follow the rules. He believed in the integrity of the justice system, that everyone gets what they deserve and that the innocent have nothing to fear. A question would arise in the coming days: Was Griffith some sort of scheming mastermind? A traitor bent on undermining his own country? The days following North Korea show that the answer is complicated.

 

Virgil Griffith
Virgil Griffith is paying heavily for his mistakes.

 

Despite all the damning accusations against him, Griffith had a certain honesty a naivety perhaps reinforced by his involvement in the cryptocurrency space, where the law was lax and the only moral compass people had to guide them was their own. Deep in that world, Griffith had simply been too far removed from the wider world with its own values and rules, agendas, intricacies and rigidity.

Two days after that frantic day on Nov. 18, following another flurry of emails and a conference call, the Justice Department prevailed. The prosecutor, Wirshba, had gone to bat with the Office of Foreign Assets Control during the call, and in the view of his colleague Krouse, that conversation went well thanks to Kyles advocacy. The OFACsaid that, if requested at trial, it would provide a witness to testify that Griffith had broken the law.

 

 

 

 

Arrested

About a week later, on Thanksgiving morning, Griffith was arrested while boarding a flight from Los Angeles to Baltimore, based on a formal complaint from Special Agent Cavanaugh in New York sworn just one day after Wirshba resolved the Treasury Departments concerns. The complaint was eight pages and more than 2,000 words, but where it discussed the facts of what happened in North Korea, it contained not even a single piece of information from sources other than Griffith. It was just the mans own words over the past seven months that had been weaponized against him.

From there, a new chapter in Griffiths life began. Even when he was later released on bail for a period, he had to abide by strict conditions. Griffith was eventually held in New Yorks infamous Metropolitan Detention Center, an unpleasant preview of the future that loomed for him. At that moment at the airport on Thanksgiving of 2019, when the law took him away under the dull and steely sky, Griffith had just experienced his last day of freedom, though he did not yet know it.

Lou writes about the North Korea affair in-depth in his new book,Once a Bitcoin Miner: Scandal and Turmoil in the Cryptocurrency Wild West. Check out Magazines Journeys in Blockchain profile of him below.

 

 

Acid, Bitcoin mining and a bad trip to North Korea

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Decentralized social media: The next big thing in crypto?

NFTs and the Metaverse are the hottest topics in the cryptocurrency ecosystem right now, but the next big thing might just be decentralized social media. Like decentralized finance, decentralized social media platforms dont have a centralized governing body and may, someday, provide viable alternatives to established platforms like Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok. The technology is currently evolving just beyond the embryonic stage of development.

Yung Beef, or YB who serves as content lead and community manager at Subsocial says that centralized social media platforms are unfair to community members and content creators. It seems pretty obvious that centralized social networks are susceptible to lots of shady stuff, with the mystery algorithms controlling what people see, people getting shadowbanned or banned outright for whatever reason, etc. And it just gets worse when you factor in that a lot of people earn their livelihood on these platforms and their food bill is totally at the whim of the central authority.

According to Subsocial, the centralized social media industry is plagued by global censorship, a lack of customization, unfair monetization, algorithm dictatorship and a monopoly on network effects.

Stani Kulechov, the CEO of Aave and a decentralized social media developer, believes that content creators should have a permissionless, censorship-resistant distribution channel with their audience. He tells Magazine that At least the people that are posting the content, creating the content, consuming it, sharing it they would definitely benefit from decentralized social media.

Kulechov made headlines in and outside of the cryptocurrency community last summer when he hinted that crypto giant Aave was considering building Twitter on Ethereum.

 

 

 

 

Michael Marra, founder and CEO of Entre a social media application that runs on the DeSo blockchain believes that decentralized social media is really about giving the power back to the people. According to him, one of the problems with centralized platforms is censorship, while another is monetization, but more on both of those later.

 

 

How does it all work?

Centralized and decentralized social media platforms both utilize some type of social graph a model of a social network that maps everyone on a platform and how theyre related and allow users to communicate with each other on a front-end platform. Traditional social media platforms are totally self-contained, and the host company controls the data servers. Twitter owns and controls all its content all your content. The same is true with Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, etc. Decentralized social media platforms live on public blockchains, and for the most part, anyone, anywhere, can operate a node, access the back end, create an app and curate a feed.

According to its website, DeSo is a new layer-1 blockchain built from the ground up to scale decentralized social applications to one billion users. The blockchain is open-source, with the code and all the data stored directly on-chain. There are over 200 apps deployed on Deso, and users who create a profile in any app can easily take that profile and their community of followers along with them to any app on the blockchain.

 

 

 

 

Entre, short for entrepreneur, is a social Web3 application that runs on DeSo. On Entre, the self-employed, the traditionally employed and any other professional can post Twitter-like content and carry out business transactions. They can conduct meetings, host virtual events and hire staff members, with the app functioning like a decentralized, digitally monetizable alternative to LinkedIn, Zoom and Google Calendar all jammed together into a single product.

 

 

 

 

While Entre runs on a social blockchain, the Aave-backed Lens Protocol is deployed on Polygon. Kulechov says that Lens is actually a decentralized social graph.

According to Kulechov, when a user of an app on the protocol creates a profile, that profile is tokenized as an NFT. Whenever someone follows a profile, they create a relationship on-chain that cant be arbitrarily broken by the platform or by anyone else, as those relationships are also tokenized as NFTs that can be viewed in a digital wallet like MetaMask or on the web on OpenSea.

 

 

 

 

Subsocial doesnt consider itself a decentralized social network, rather a platform for building social networks. It allows users to create profiles and customize personal Spaces and claims to have serverless public timelines, roles and permissions, user governance, moderation, Spaces for DAOs, and a treasury. The platform runs on the Polkadot and Kusama blockchains, and it recently built its first app, a decentralized RedditMedium hybrid.

According to YB, Subsocial plans to remove the profiles in the future. To save space, all content uploaded onto Subsocial (pics, videos and text) is hosted on the InterPlanetary File System, with an IPFS content identifier uploaded to the blockchain. Each IPFS node is hosted by one or more people, and those node operators are in control of what they host on their servers.

 

 

 

 

While developers at Lens Protocol, Entre and Subsocial build out the next generation of decentralized, Web3 social platforms and apps, other platforms such as Theta and Audius are integrating social media tools into decentralized video and audio streaming services. Theta is a peer-to-peer network operating on its own blockchain, with users sharing bandwidth to relay video to one another. On its website, YouTube co-founder Steve Chen is quoted as saying the project can bring improved video delivery at lower costs. Like on YouTube, brands and creators can stream content as followers comment in real time.

Audius, meanwhile, is a decentralized audio streaming platform that runs on Solana and hopes to afford everyone the freedom to distribute, monetize and stream any audio content. Artists can easily upload musical clips to the platform, while fans can listen to original compositions and mixes, curate libraries, and repost, follow, like and share content. It offers the same amount of fun but without middlemen throwing trivial ads your way and then taking a hefty cut from content creators.

What about the bad guys?

If creators are expected to monitor their own content on a completely decentralized platform like Subsocial, how can the distribution of illegal content and disinformation be controlled? Social media moderation has been a controversial topic for years, and platforms like Facebook and Twitter havent always done a good job both filtering out dangerous content and maintaining a commitment to open dialogue.

YB explains to Magazine that Subsocial is censorship-resistant, while Kulechov says that Lens Protocol is built completely to be agnostic in the sense that its a technical solution, basically to build social media applications. Entres Marra says:

If it is open, that means anything kind of goes. You can control it to some degree.

Marra believes that blockchains can be built to facilitate the communitys ability to report things. Community members, especially those with higher authority like those with lots of followers or a good reputation can signal that a bad actor is posting dubious content. The offenders content should then go way down in the feed. Marra argues that blockchain verification will also prevent a lot of this stuff, saying You will instantly know that this person is not legit.

 

 

 

 

According to Kulechov, moderation is all about creating choices for everyone. Lens Protocol has a common social graph where all user information is actively linked, and unlike traditional social media, that social graph is decentralized. Kulechov believes that decentralizing the social graph so that everyone has access to it provides more opportunities to moderate more humanely.

This accessible interconnectivity affords developers opportunities to create algorithms focused on content moderation. It essentially puts the front ends of the protocol, the applications, into a position where they compete to offer accessibility to accurate, appropriate information. Kulechov says:

Maybe the right type of content moderation might be community-led, where the communitys site people announce themselves and moderate or select the algorithms.

Subsocial has three levels of moderation. To start, every post is made in a Space. Think of Spaces like a subreddit, a Facebook group, a Twitter profile or a blog, YB says. Each Space has at least one owner who can moderate its content. Also, each IPFS node is hosted by at least one community member. Those operators can control what they host on their servers. Lastly, anyone can build a front-end social application on the platform. A front end connected to one of the Subsocial blockchains can read all the content on the chain. The operator can control what is distributed on the front end.

 

 

 

 

Still, if a front-end operator and a group of bad actors were determined to disseminate misinformation or illegal content, YB says it could be shut down with an on-chain vote. [That] would be a big deal and likely a big hassle, but it also would be pointless, as those people could just make another Space right away and continue on. YB argues that people use the internet to coordinate violence and share illegal content all the time it’s just hidden, which it still would be, as large social networks built on Subsocial wouldnt show that stuff.

One thing to note, however, is that centralized social media platforms with the power to shut down a creator or community with the click of a button have struggled for years to contain the distribution of illegal content and misinformation.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

As such, even though relying on the community to moderate itself is egalitarian and sounds good in theory, it may not prove effective in practice. Self-moderation on censorship-resistant platforms would likely require fully engaged community members. That may not always be the case in the Web3 environment, as active members of communities need to be present in significant enough numbers to monitor bad actors on any given decentralized network. For example, a recent analysis ranking community engagement in DAOs showed mixed results.

How might a censorship-resistant platform respond when an extraordinarily large community goes off the rails? Considering the massive amount of disinformation that could be generated by an organized, well-funded army of bots, could a universally adopted, decentralized network moderate a community of thousands of such propagandists?

Show me the money all the money

Equitable monetization for community members and content creators is one of the key features of the decentralized social media ecosystem. Juxtaposed against unbalanced monetization schemes in traditional social media, decentralized social earning could be a game changer for content creators and magnetize universal adoption efforts.

YB tells Magazine, Personally, I think the monetization stuff will be much more attractive to content creators than any censorship resistance. YouTube, for example, takes 45% of ad revenue, which is pretty insane. He adds further, Im really interested to see what happens with the tips. I hope we see the emergence of a micro-tipping economy, since it will be so easy. Scrolling through the timeline and see a joke that brightens your morning? Why not tip them $0.50 in a second or two?

 

 

 

 

Lens Protocol is taking a hands-off approach to monetization. We wanted to touch monetization as little as possible and give a lot of space for our developers to come and solve that, Kulechov says. Lens is currently building a very basic monetization function around content collection and amplification. Whenever creators post music, text, audio or video, followers can then collect that content as NFTs. There are different collection modules, and followers can mint the NFTs themselves. If those followers then amplify that content, the creator collects mirror fees, which is like monetizing a retweet on Twitter.

On the DeSo blockchain, the DESO token can be used to purchase creator coins. BitClout, Diamond and CloutFeed are Twitter-like applications that allow followers who support a particular creator to invest in their coin, exponentially increasing its value. Although not recommended, the coins can be converted back to DESO and actively traded or cashed out for fiat. Entre, according to Marra, isnt into creator coins and is more focused on allowing creators to earn DESO through tipping when they livestream.

 

 

 

 

Entre users can also sell tickets to in-person or virtual events and charge for private one-on-one services like consulting and coaching. The app offers a Slack- and Discord-like community feature where membership fees can be charged and users can offer services like graphic design. Currently, DESO is the only cryptocurrency accepted on the app, but Marra intends to offer multiple tokens in the future.

Theta has been in the monetization game for some time and offers crypto rewards for creators, fans and hosts. The platform has two tokens: THETA and TFUEL. Owners of THETA, its native token, can participate in governance and earn more THETA by staking or running a node. TFUEL is essentially a utility token for the platform and can be earned by community members for watching streams on Theta.tv or hosting Guardian and Edge Nodes. They can spend TFUEL on real-world merchandise in the TFUEL Shop or use it to buy subscriptions to paid content.

 

 

 

 

Audius, meanwhile, uses its AUDIO token to help artists monetize their work and fans support them. Community members can earn AUDIO for uploads, invites, going mobile, linking social media accounts and sustaining listening streaks. Fans can send AUDIO directly to artists.

Decentralized social media certainly has the potential to tip the equity and privacy scales in favor of users and content creators. It could reshape the social media industry and redefine an era of digital free speech in the Web3 era. But in order to achieve that, it may still need to find an elusive solution to content moderation, and it will need to achieve universal adoption. Thought leaders in the space have their eyes toward the future, with Kulechov saying:

 

Adoption is gonna be a long game, for sure. It might take years to adopt. It’s basically one application at a time.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Are CBDCs kryptonite for crypto?

Central bank digital currencies digital currencies backed by a central bank have received renewed interest with the United States President Joe Bidens Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets. Proponents of CBDCs argue that widespread adoption will promote financial inclusion, expand public access to safe money, improve the efficiency of payments and more.

But their rationale remains tenuous. Many analysts and practitioners increasingly view CBDCs as fundamentally at odds with the purpose of cryptocurrency, which is to provide a secure, decentralized peer-to-peer mechanism for transferring funds. And the hypothetical benefits of CBDCs remain hypothetical no evidence exists yet that suggests any advantages over other examples of distributed ledger technologies in financial services, especially given the new risks they pose.

The status of CBDCs worldwide

Nine countries have already developed their own CBDCs, and the U.S. has joined a list of over 100 countries exploring issuing one. Most CBDCs take a hybrid approach whereby The central bank issues the CBDC to banks and other and other payment service providers, which in turn distribute the CBDC to users throughout the economy and provide them with account-related services, according to a recent report by the Hoover Institution.

There are other types, according to leading experts at the Bank for International Settlements which consists of stakeholders from major central banks. These include a synthetic CBDC, where the consumer has a claim on an intermediary, with the central bank only keeping track of wholesale accounts; and a direct CBDC, where the consumer has a claim on the central bank, with it handling all the retail.

Anti CBDC
Bitcoiners have launched a campaign against CBDCs, warning that they allow the government to control what you spend money on.

Some scholars have underscored that DLT has a role to play in helping central banks become more efficient and secure, but such technology should be introduced with a minimally invasive CBDC design one that upgrades money to current needs without disrupting the proven two-tier architecture of the monetary system, according to Raphael Auer, head of the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Centre, and Rainer Bhme, a professor at the University of Innsbruck.

The fact that central banks are interested in digital currencies is not surprising. As countries look to rebound from nearly two years of lockdowns and other restrictions on mobility, coupled with rising inflation, central banks have been feeling the pressure to promote employment and manage price levels u20 their dual mandate. Across the world, central banks have bought a significant amount of bonds, thereby expanding the money supply and arguably further contributing to inflation. For example, the Federal Reserve has expanded the U.S. money supply from roughly $4 trillion to over $20 trillion over the past two years, but we are only now seeing the resulting inflationary effects.

Evaluating the potential benefits

In a 2020 report, the BISoutlined a handful of potential benefits brought up by proponents of CBDCs: financial inclusion, cross-border payments, financial resilience and stability, increased efficiency of fiscal transfers, and privacy. But cryptocurrency fulfills all of these aims better than government-backed currencies.

Lets take a look at these potential benefits one by one.

Financial inclusion: The expansion of decentralized finance and emergence of nonfungible tokens are already changing the economic landscape. Thousands of content creators have sold NFTs and joined the DeFi community, removing intermediaries and allowing revenues to go directly to the creators.

Were entering a Web2.5 era where content creators have benefited from the rise of social media, but what they create is owned by centralized groups, Avery Akkineni, president of VaynerNFT, tells Magazine. Now they are starting to own the end-to-end process, and weve seen some of these creators become wildly successful. […] That is inspiring a new generation of creators.

Furthermore, existing financial institutions have already expanded access to credit by lowering the barriers to adoption. My research from 2021 found that the expansion of mobile banking in the U.S. since 2014 has been concentrated among those who are younger, single or a part of minority groups.

Even if these patterns were not true, its unclear how CBDCs expand financial inclusion.

 

 

CBDC proponents cite numerous advantages, but anything a digital dollar can do, crypto can do better.

 

 

Cross-border payments and efficiency of fiscal transfers: While financial transactions across borders are already possible, they are time-intensive and costly. However, several Web3 companies enabling cross-border transactions have emerged, including Ripple.

Financial resilience and stability: Resilience is integral to cushion against unanticipated shocks to the system. The 20072008 financial crisis in the U.S. and many developed countries was arguably driven by a concentration of risky, securitized assets. In the run-up to the crisis, the number of mortgages increased rapidly, but many new homeowners were not financially prepared to pay their mortgages a pattern that was, at least partially, influenced by the Federal Reserve through its impact on interest rates and failure to attend to the warning signs.

 

 

 

 

The financial crisis could have been avoided if these warning signs had been taken more seriously. The United States 2011 Financial Crisis Inquiry Report reads: The prime example is the Federal Reserves pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages, which it could have done by setting prudent mortgage-lending standards. The Federal Reserve was the one entity empowered to do so and it did not.

Central banks are making analogous claims to those made in the run-up to the financial crisis when they play down the risks of CBDCs, especially the possible monopolization of the financial system by the central bank, and talk only about their benefits. A core instrument by which central banks carry out their public policy objectives is providing the safest form of money to banks, businesses and the public central bank money, according to the BIS.

 

 

CBDCs
CBDCs are designed to attack crypto and shore up the power of central banks, according to critics.

 

Charles Calomiris, Henry Kaufman professor of financial institutions at Columbia Business School, tells Magazine that CBDCs seem more like a power grab than useful financial technology.

CBDC is the latest attempt to expand their power at our expense by self-interested central bankers, which have done more in developed countries to expand their power at the expense of democracy over the past two decades than any other instrument of government.

The architectural design of CBDCs matters. If they are designed so that they, even if not explicitly stated, can replace private commercial and retail banking, as the Peoples Bank of China has suggested, then central banks will have yet another mechanism for creating money that has no collateral or underlying asset value. Such an approach would have grave inflationary implications.

Last year, several economists published research on CBDCs and bank runs, finding that large-scale intermediation by central banks could lead to them becoming monopolies. Since central banks contracts with investment banks tend to be rigid, they have the potential to deter bank runs. Consumers internalize this feature ex-ante, and the central bank arises as a deposit monopolist, attracting all deposits away from the commercial banking sector, according to the researchs authors.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

A nail in the coffin for privacy

Even though public documents from central bankers talk about privacy as a feature of CBDCs, no explanation exists for how this will work. In contrast, the BIS reported that Full anonymity is not plausible. […] For a CBDC and its system, payments data will exist, and a key national policy question will be deciding who can access which parts of it and under what circumstances.

Such a rollout could mean that every central bank would be able to identify each user. Today, a bank cannot tell who is using a euro versus a dollar bill, but The key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control [over] the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also, we will have the technology to enforce that, said Agustin Carstens, general manager of the BIS, during a 2020 panel discussion.

 

 

US CBDC
The U.S. is looking into a digital dollar, but will it be in keeping with the principles that make America what it is? Source: Pexels

 

 

There is little doubt that illicit transactions occur with cryptocurrency, but illicit transactions have always taken place, whether a thousand years ago with gold or today with cash. The question is how to create a framework that preserves privacy and counters illicit activity.

If central banks can track every transaction, what is to stop them from shutting down peoples access to finance, travel and their livelihoods? Furthermore, what would stop central banks from coordinating, as outlined in the BIS 2020 report?

CBDCs dont just threaten but fully infringe upon our financial autonomy, stripping away our most basic rights and freedoms as enumerated by our forefathers, Eric Waisanen, co-founder of Hydro.Finance and host of the Secret Code Podcast, tells Magazine. In contrast, DeFi provides freedom from the alleged protection that strips us of our ability to participate, Waisanen continues.

 

 

 

 

The future of money and DeFi

The future of finance lies in decentralization. While we have traditionally known and interacted with large, centralized institutions, we have seen a widespread preference for and adoption of decentralized technologies arise from technological advances coupled with a recognition of the ills of centralization.

But DLT,and blockchain more generally, is only a tool. It still needs good governance and proper stewarding. The emergence of CBDCs is likely to centralize the creation and flow of finance even further by granting central banks even more authority to issue tokens rather than buy and sell bonds on a somewhat open market.

A CBDC is an authoritarian governments dream and represents a giant step backward for consumer privacy, says Paul Watkins, managing director at Patomak Global Partners.

Many architectures for CBDCs have been proposed. There is widespread enthusiasm for the use of DLT in central banking, but not for retail CBDCs that simultaneously can create money without collateral and require individuals to share personally identifiable information. It is important to seriously consider the architecture of a CBDC when thinking about design; otherwise, CBDCs will be launched in competition with the growing move and appetite for decentralization.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

How to make a Metaverse: Secrets of the founders

Cointelegraph Magazine talks to some of the leading Metaverse founders to discover their secret sauce for Web3.

Featuring co-founder of The Sandbox Sebastien Borget, co-founder of Upland Idan Zuckerman, head of metaverse growth of Unique Network Irina Karagyuar, chief marketing officer of Univers Peter Nguyen, co-founder of Alien Worlds Sarojini McKenna, co-founder of Immersys Daniel Knott, head of metaverse and NFT of Zilliqa Sandra H and co-founder and chief marketing officer of Bloktopia Paddy Carroll.

Sand dues

The Sandbox has established itself as a major player in the Metaverse and appears to some to have catapulted onto the main stage overnight. But, co-founder Sebastien Borget points out that The Sandbox began life as a mobile gaming studio, pursuing that for eight years before spending four more in blockchain.

So, its not an overnight success, just in the right place at the right time or, perhaps, it helped create the right place and time.

 

 

 

 

Weve been unlucky at times and also lucky. I wouldnt pretend we invented anything. The ingredients were all there and we were able to piece them together with meaning, value and utility. Now, we are focused on how we develop this form of entertainment, he says.

We started with gaming but we are open to any kind of entertainment and want to bring in more culture, more lifestyle, more immersion and more socialization in ways not seen before.

There are many metaverses in Web3 and Magazine caught up with some of the more prominent founders to get unique insights into how these new digital lands emerged. After all, its not every day that someone gets to create a new land or more importantly people are enthused enough to come join them.

Progressive decentralization

Like many of the Web3 projects being built, the Sandbox is currently being run as a centralized entity, but its economy is being decentralized through NFTs. Borget calls it progressive decentralization.

It is big business, as Sandbox has demonstrated through the sale of its virtual real estate and the attraction of some of the biggest brands including Paris Hilton, Snoop Dog and Nike.

The current value of the land base of Sandbox based on the secondary market price is close to $1.5 billion, while the SAND tokens market cap is $3.3 billion and ranked #37 overall by total market cap, per CoinMarketCap.

Last month, JP Morgan issued a report on metaverses which concluded by saying that the Metaverse will most likely infiltrate every sector in some way in the coming years, with the market opportunity estimated at $1 trillion in yearly revenues. Its a bit loose on specifics and the report leaned much more heavily into the hype than reality, but suggests that the only way is up. Since publishing that report, JPMorgan has opened a branch in Decentraland and only this week, HSBC followed suit.

The timing is right, says Borget.

 

 

How to make a Metaverse: Secrets of the founders
An artists impression of the Metaverse. Everyone will be good looking in the virtual world.

 

 

The only way is Upland

Upland is an NFT metaverse that is mapped to the real world where users can buy, sell and trade virtual properties akin to real-life counterparts.

Upland is all about the blurring between the real and digital worlds. While there is huge room for fantasy worlds in the Metaverse, Upland is focused on an experience that is mapped to the real world and real-world location delivered through a mobile-first mindset, says Idan Zuckerman, co-founder of Upland.

 

 

 


With its direct mapping, Upland mirrors much of reality, but when asked which part of IRL would he leave behind, Zuckerman says instantly:

Wars.

He had a very clear image of what he wanted to achieve from the beginning and says its important to understand the future ramifications of newly developed technology. He points out the domain extension for Upland is dot.me with the me standing for metaverse.

Our inspiration came from the earliest concept of NFTs. Back in 2018, we studied the ERC-721 contract, or the NFT standard on Ethereum, and early products that were built to utilize it for early iterations of blockchain games, says Zuckerman.

We realized what this could mean for the future of digital economies and digital ownership. Web3, even before the term was coined as the future, has been the DNA since the beginning of the Upland operation.

Web3?

Irina Karagyuar, head of metaverse at Unique Network, the leading Polkadot NFT platform, explains that Web3 is a decentralized, consensual and token economy based model compared with the existing Web2 centralized platform-oriented model of Facebook, Spotify, YouTube, Google, etc.

If we remain with the same Web2 model, any new development, including the Metaverse, will exacerbate the problems were facing already related to data privacy, human rights, the uneven spread of wealth for creators and other problems.

Karagyuar adds that Web3 is adding real value to the Metaverse because it will allow sustainable business models and bring trust back again. All we need for this to become true is to educate the people so we get things right.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Zuckerman is looking forward to build out the usefulness of Upland to more than just land. He wants to make Upland into the most sustainable digital economy the world has ever seen and is keen on brands and entrepreneurs entering this space.

Upland has Metaventures which are player-run shops that present micro-entrepreneurs and enterprises with the ability to create new revenue streams.

Zuckerman believes that community is the single most important aspect of any digital economy.

Peter Nguyen, chief marketing officer of Univers, a metaverse network that seeks to connect the metaverses, agrees.

Community is extremely important to Univers because we are a project built for the people, by the people. We want our ecosystem to benefit every type of user. Therefore, nurturing a passionate community interested in the evolution of Univers is crucial. We want community feedback. We want users to explore their own creativity and add to the project. We want to connect all of these amazing virtual experiences and give people a place to dream while they build meaningful relationships.

Without a community, then there is no Metaverse.

Communities and competition

Its all about the DAO, says Sarojini McKenna, referring to decentralized autonomous organizations. Hes the co-founder of Alien Worlds, a metaverse with seven planets built on the WAX blockchain.

Alien Worlds is converting people to mass adoption through strategy and governance. Its like sneaking extra shredded vegetables into childrens dinners they dont even know they are eating them. Likewise, the gamers are often unaware that they are building something much bigger than mining Trilium on a planet in a galaxy far, far away.

Launched two years ago, its the biggest game on WAX and flips in and out of first and second place of all decentralized applications globally with PancakeSwap and Splinterlands, according to DappRadar (https://dappradar.com/rankings.)

Alien worlds
Female Cyborg from Alien Worlds

Alien Worlds allows people to earn Trilium through mining on the six planets in the game using different implements and rewards. Trilium can also be cashed out, and there are many videos on YouTube showing you how to do this, but McKenna is less interested in that aspect.

The goal is not just to mine Trilium, its to mine it and stake it to a particular planet. The six planets are competing for the scarce resource. The bigger the planet with more users and the more Trilium staked, the more Trilium it attracts in daily inflation.

From there, the planets can get a bigger treasury and more control over their planet. In time, adherents of each planet will be able to amend the codebase and change the rules of the game. Initially, a starter template is passed down, much in the same way as the ten commandments, with certain permission thresholds. But, over time, they are going to be able to scratch away at the rules and instate their own.

We are always encouraging players to team up, make friends and then go and dominate a planet. This is all in preparation for the arrival of governance to the six planets and whether or not they own land, and we want players to run events with people with common goals. In turn, this may lead to the actual management of a planet, says McKenna.

The bridge is all mine

In a new development, Alien Worlds also announced that it built a bridge to Minecraft, the popular gaming platform with more than 100 million players. It will offer a fast onboarding of non-blockchain gamers onto the WAX platform and allow traditional gamers the opportunity of earning cryptocurrency, in this case, Trilium, for completing quests.

This was a daring idea, as the worlds of gamers and blockchain play-to-earn are not as neatly connected as one might imagine when looking in from the outside. For one, P2E games are focused on earning largely through repetitive tasks or card-based challenges. Gamers like to play games, often employing complex storylines although there are also many shoot em up popular models.

 

 

 

 

Another P2E game on the WAX blockchain is Immersys. Founded by Daniel Knott, he originally started called Immersys a Multiverse.

After looking into the term metaverse and its meaning, we decided we were in fact not just a metaverse, but a metaverse ecosystem. The Metaverse is made up of many different levels. Each level is represented by some sort of future tech, decentralization and nonfungible tokens are just a small portion of the Metaverse. We call ourselves an ecosystem because Immersys is focused on developing technology that spans multiple layers of the Metaverse like augmented reality and virtual reality.

 

 

Immersys.
Immersys is a P2E game on the WAX blockchain.

 

 

He sees land sales as being important, but the community is even more important. Land, just like in the real world, is all about location and until all metaverses are connected, youll want to make sure youre building in a world that has a strong community. A place where you can be confident that youre not just the product, but a producer.

Knott is also well embedded in the Metaverse, with most of his assets in crypto. He wants to leave fiat behind. And, when asked if he will move to the Metaverse, he says: I already have.

Metaverservice

Sandra H is head of metaverse at Zilliqa and calls Metapolis the first-ever metaverse as a service, or MaaS, platform that is powered by a layer-1 blockchain. Launched in January, it is a highly immersive and gamified XR metaverse platform. Her focus is on continuous tech growth and building out cities for brands, partners and individuals to belong to.

The project wants to integrate the real with the Metaverse.

The Metaverse in itself calls for a mixture of real-world elements and an eclectic mix of ideas and concepts. That is why our vision with Metapolis is to infuse the two not only when it comes to designing how your city or dome would look like in the Metaverse, but also how you can integrate these elements together to create an immersive experience all around. For example, if you have an NFT on display in your physical house, you can scan a QR code and end up in your Metapolis dome where you can continue looking through your gallery of NFTs, she says.

 

 

Metapolis
Everyone can own a yacht in the Metaverse until the price of the NFT shoots through the roof and noobs get stuck with a dinghy.

 

 

Metapolis is looking at having all the earns such as play-to-earn and learn-to-earn, including move-to-earn another way of integrating the real world with the virtual.

We are deep diving to move-to-earn when it comes to wearables and how they can be attached to our physical world, leveling up our avatars, gain rewards and unlocking features.

When asked if she will move into the Metaverse, H replies: I am already operating on MST, or Metapolis Standard Time.

 

 

 

 

Bloktopia

A more recent metaverse is Bloktopia, which arrived in the past year, and is headquartered in the United Kingdom. Bloktopia is a metaverse platform designed as a skyscraper with 21 levels where users can purchase designated spaces from the floorplan with the platforms cryptocurrency token BLOK.

Paddy Carroll, co-founder, says: For me, a Metaverse is a virtual world and the next logical iteration of the internet. Anything that can be done in the real world should be able to be achieved. It should be focused on social connection but without the boundaries of geographical location. If something which claims to be a Metaverse isnt doing that, then I dont think it is one.

 

 

 

 

Brands are critical to the Blocktopia skyscraper metaverse. Brands provide identity. They maintain relevance and interest for visitors and they allow for commercialization keeping the Metaverse afloat.

The mission for our metaverse is to contain everything that anyone will ever need to know about Cryptocurrency and NFTs. We need brands in there, right from exchanges, blockchains, NFT projects and even other metaverses. We have attracted major brands in the crypto space like Binance, Solana and Animoca Brands, along with global influencers like Jake Paul who have opened retail spaces, shops or offices in our digital skyscraper.

Univers founder Nguyen also agrees on the importance of brands to the space.

Integrating these brands into the Metaverse is brilliant because brands can create entirely new and limitless experiences while their consumers benefit from the freedom blockchain presents, continuing to indulge in their favorite brands. Weve already begun to see fashion bands creating NFTs for some of their most sought-after apparel. Not only do consumers get the chance to actually purchase the apparel, but using AR, they can see what it looks like on their body before purchasing.

 

 

 

 

Nguyen explains that once the apparel is accompanied by NFTs, consumers can prove authenticity and enjoy many other benefits attached to owning the NFT such as private showings, talks or exclusive previews. Brands in the Metaverse can enhance consumer experience while accessing new audiences and adding to the prestige and growth of the Metaverse as a whole.

Its a symbiotic relationship where brands benefit from the technology, freedom and ever-growing audience of the Metaverse while gaining real-world utility, untapped audiences and bright new minds to continue developing it, he says.

Connecting the worlds

Univers aims to address how to connect the metaverses like international travel but without the carbon footprint. Its not a Metaverse but a Metaverse network.

Nguyen says: This is because the Metaverse is singular, or, more accurately, a space within which all virtual experiences coexist and are pieces of the greater whole. Our objective is to change the dialogue around the Metaverse so that more people understand that we are all important pieces of the Metaverse and are more powerful when connected.

Univers is the Metaverse network. We are the thread that weaves all of these incredible projects together and allows for increased interoperability, utility and, ultimately, connectivity.

Like Upworld, Univers looks to include real-world elements in a way that is considered to be not only important but also essential and natural.

We regard the Metaverse as an extension of our reality. The infinite possibilities of the Metaverse inspire user creativity, while the real world elements are what make the Metaverse truly innovative. By including real world elements, we learn more about our real world and how to actively improve it. The more we embrace the Metaverse as an extension of our reality, the more we can use it to develop real world solutions and expand upon its utility in our everyday lives.

The common view of most founders is that they are already down the rabbit hole and living in their corner of the Metaverse. As Carroll from Bloktopia says come join me.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

Crypto critics: Why do they bother? Can FUD be useful?

Anyone who says that David Gerard personally stopped their crypto getting into Wikipedia is a fuckwit, says editor, Wikimedia spokesman and professional crypto hater David Gerard in his typically no-nonsense fashion.

There are a lot of fuckwits.

When Gerard is not passionately arguing against cryptocurrencies in Wikipedia editor discussions, the author of the 2017 self-published hit Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain can be found prosecuting the case against Bitcoin, blockchain and crypto on the BBC or in the Financial Times.

Even among the most notable crypto critics, Gerard stands out. Hes hated Bitcoin and blockchain for more than a decade since BTC was first discussed as an alternative funding source for Wikileaks after mainstream payment processors cut it off.

David Gerard
Crypto critic David Gerard.

For Gerard, like a number of other critics, the problem with Bitcoin isnt just that its a hyped-up Ponzi scheme or a glorified database with no genuine use case he sees it as philosophically and politically wrong.

I saw that Bitcoin was created by internet libertarians and figured that would predict everything about it, he tells Magazine. I was correct. People who think they dont need to know what theyre talking about and can reinvent it all from first principles are certain to fuck up in predictable ways, and they have.

For Gerard who leans left and describes himself as liberal Bitcoin appears to be a right-wing Libertarian project and thats reason enough to oppose it.

Libertarianism as a political ideology is fundamentally childish and dumb as hell. Growing up in Australia, I didnt even believe this shit was real I thought Libertarianism was some sort of savage Swiftian satire, not a thing people would actually believe. Then I got on the internet, and oh well.

Crypto dystopians

Gerard isnt the only professional Bitcoin hater out there, with the sector attracting more well-known skeptics and vehement opponents than most. That may be partly because the crypto community seems to hang on their every salvo and negative tweet in a sort of sadomasochistic relationship.

The crypto haters are loud and proud, from gold bug Peter Schiff tweeting in delight at every price drop in his attempts to flog gold to economist Nouriel Roubini shouting bad-tempered invective about criminal Ponzi-like bubbles. Theyre not all a bunch of Luddites either: Some have impressive credentials like Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman or Nassim Taleb who wrote the celebrated book The Black Swan but went on to interject the word Bitdiot into every other tweet.

 

 

Crypto critics
Crypto critics: Saving you from becoming wealthy since 2011.

 

 

And, there are plenty of grassroots opponents, too, like the zeitgeist style criticisms from NFT haters in the art community who see it as environment-destroying cancer or those in the gaming community who picture it as a shameless cash grab from game developers trying to squeeze another dollar out of users.

The question is: Why do crypto critics bother? What is it about the sector that both fascinates and repels them? Why dont they just say, meh, its not for me, and get on with their lives?

 

 

 

 

Endless cavalcade of conmen

I ask Gerard, who spends much of his waking hours scanning the internet for negative crypto news stories to feed into his blog. Gerard sold 14,000 copies of Attack an almost unheard-of number for a self-published book in the United Kingdom so a certain degree of professional success is undoubtedly part of the appeal. Hes transformed the book into a blog that averages 1000-3000 hits a day, while particularly strong stories like his reports on El Salvadors Bitcoin Law can get 10,000 hits.

He says that he just cant look away. Theres always stuff to cover, but it is fascinating its such an endless cavalcade of grifters, suckers and suckers who think theyre the grifter, he says.

The moral core of Attack is that scams and scammers are bad and reprehensible. But, the hilarious stupidity is inexhaustible. Theres always another story to tell about dumb crooks.

If crypto people would like me to stop, probably the first thing they need to do is stop feeding me material.

A long time ago, in a former brothel

By curious coincidence around about the same time that the Cypherpunks were dreaming up e-cash outside the control of governments in the mid-1990s, Gerard and I were uni student housemates in a shabby former brothel in Brunswick, Australia. I hadnt seen him since until he popped up in an interview for the film Cryptopia.

Back then, he was a greasy-haired music nerd and student newspaper editor who got into a massive fight with local Scientologists after running an expose on the cult-like aspects of the church and revealing its secrets about the alien Xenu who well, you can look it up. The Scientologists were incensed and stole all the print copies. Gerard then started up the Australian Critics of Scientology webpage to get the material out.

 

 

Scientology
In the mid-1990s, web pages looked like this.

 

 

Given the almost certain legal action from the church, hosting such a site was a risky endeavor. Gerard enlisted the help of a young hacker and Cypherpunk named Julian Assange, who was the system administrator of a free speech devoted ISP called Suburbia.net.

He recounted the experience in a recent podcast, noting that Assange had titanium balls. Depleted uranium nutsack, it was incredible.

For about four years there he was getting legal threats, investigators coming around […] I will say that he stood by me absolutely reliably at that time, in what most people would call quite trying circumstances. I think thats because we both have the sort of inclination, the sort of person whose response to any slight whatsoever is bring it on. Neither of us knew how to back down.

Assange later said the experience with the Scientology site helped him realize how a certain platform called Wikileaks could work.

Gerard was as passionate then about fighting the cult of Scientology as he is today about fighting crypto, and its hard not to conclude that he sees himself as the lone voice of reason fighting against indoctrination and insanity in both cases. In a similar fashion, both Schiff and Roubini famously predicted the global financial crisis and now take pride in their ability to see through what they believe is the hype of blockchain and expose its hollow core.

 

 

Cobie
Crypto influencer Cobie took aim at crypto critic Amy Castor this week. She responded: I must have touched a nerve. Poor little babies.

 

 

Unlike many critics, Gerard actually does his research and is quite well informed about issues in the space, so if you can handle his relentlessly negative approach and frequently 100% wrong conclusions about how irredeemably terrible everything in crypto is, youll probably find at least some crypto news on his blog you wont have seen elsewhere. In fact, anyone enthusiastic about crypto should probably follow at least a couple of skeptics to ensure theyre getting the other side of the story.

Filmmaker Torsten Hoffman tells Magazine he featured Gerard in his award-winning 2020 Cryptopia documentary because some of his points are well informed.

In the film, his take on corporate blockchain projects was spot on. They are often just disguised centralized database projects that the chief technology officer re-branded into blockchain in order to get the budget approved and a NYT headline.

But, Gerard and one or two others are the exceptions that prove the rule. By and large, crypto critics appear to have no idea what theyre talking about. Taleb wrote an academic paper suggesting that the main Bitcoin blockchain will die because all the Bitcoin will move to the Lightning Network. Krugman has been recycling the same views he had more than a decade ago that Bitcoins a bubble based on nothing that sets the monetary system back 300 years and is comparable to Bernie Maddoffs Ponzi scheme.

 

 

 

 

Nothing like good criticism

Economics Professor Jason Potts, the co-director of the Blockchain Innovation Hub at RMIT in Melbourne, believes theres nothing like good criticism to sharpen your ideas and thinking. The trouble is, most of the current crop of crypto critics offer arguments that are nothing like good criticism.

I think criticism has an incredibly important role in any intellectual endeavor. Youre developing ideas and you need critics of ideas to help shape their development, he says. My perspective is that in the blockchain space, kind of since the beginning, the self-identified critics have been pretty underwhelming.

 

 

Jason Potts
If you havent read our interview with Jason Potts about the future of blockchain, youre missing out.

 

 

Potts believes that the rapid evolution of the technology and the concepts involved means anyone not immersed in the topic risks being left behind.

This is such a fast moving experimental space where just the knowledge gap between the frontiers and what we knew before is so vast, that unless youre actually involved in the space and building, its really easy just to fundamentally misunderstand what’s going on.

Loving the haters

So, why is it that the crypto community actively seems to enjoy the haters? Roubini has appeared at crypto conferences around the world, where hes dragged out like an ill-tempered performing monkey to rehash the same arguments for money in debates against crypto proponents from BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes to Bitcoin Cashs Roger Ver.

And, Schiffs following seems to be overwhelmingly Bitcoiners. When his son Spencer decided to go all-in on Bitcoin rather than gold, the elder Schiff put up a Twitter poll asking: Whose advice do you want to follow? A 57-year-old experienced investor/business owner whos been an investment professional for over 30 years or an 18-year-old college freshman whos never even had a job.

 

 

 

 

The fact that 81% of 83,000 respondents picked the kid suggests a large part of his 650,000 Twitter followers are actually just Bitcoiners that love to hate-read his posts.

Its possible that the fascination comes from a perverse sense of pride and enjoyment in listening to the haters, given Bitcoin has been declared dead by the media 446 times. Yet, the price keeps going up year after year as more and more institutions come on board. Vindication is a great feeling.

Hoffman, whos currently working on re-releasing his 2015 documentary Bitcoin: The End Of Money As We Know It, points out that Schiff exploits this dynamic for his own ends.

Lets give the man some credit. Hes a master troll. His crusade against Bitcoin and Bitcoiners crusade against Schiff just helps with getting more retweets, podcast downloads and page views. See, were talking about him right here

Rumor has it that Roubini could almost retire off a few more crypto conference appearances.

Torsten
Cryptopia filmmaker Torsten Hoffman.

Roubini has allegedly made a nice side career with six-digit speaking fees ranting about crypto, says Hoffman. That doesnt make everything he says wrong, but maybe we should look at people 40 years younger when it comes to understanding the crypto economy.

BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes said something similar after the famed Tangle in Tapei debate with Roubini in 2019.

It was quite clear that Roubini is a one-trick pony, he added. He increases his publicity by being hyper-critical of Bitcoin regardless of the actual facts. And that is why the media trots him out whenever they need someone to bash Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency industry.

Hayes, of course, later pleaded guilty on charges related to Anti-Money Laundering provisions and agreed to pay a $10 million fine, which lends some credence to Roubinis criticism that BitMEX is just an example of everything that is sick and wrong in the industry.

 

 

 

 

The old guard

Everything new has its critics, of course. When mobile phones came out, anyone seen carrying one was reviled. When MP3 players arrived, no one thought carrying around a flash drive with three albums of low-quality music files was going to take off.

But, as Potts points out, disruptive tech also has to fight against those who benefit from the existing system.

 

 

 

 

A lot of what is coming as criticism of the Bitcoin blockchain, crypto space is really just straight-up standard defensive maneuvers from existing power structures, and that doesnt strike me as an effective critique, that strikes me as just defensive of the status quo, says Potts.

Potts says Berkshire Hathaways Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger are a case in point. Buffett thinks Bitcoin is rat poison squared and Munger compared it to venereal disease:

Theyre invested in a previous set of institutional technologies and business models that are heavily reliant on the ways in which money and payments and registries and incentive structures organizations work. This is highly disruptive [] Therefore, just for purely shareholder self interest reasons, they dont like it.

Krugman has been quite explicit about the need to defend the existing financial order against Bitcoin since he first criticized it in the New York Times in September 2011.

Krugman
Paul Krugman has been wrong about Bitcoin since long before you heard about it.

He argued that if Bitcoin became a reserve currency, its fixed supply would mean central bankers couldnt inflate the money supply to stimulate the economy. In 2013, he approvingly quotes Charlie Stross in a blog post titled Bitcoin is evil.

BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mindto damage states ability to collect tax and monitor their citizens financial transactions.

Bitcoiners like to respond to his criticisms by pointing to his 1998 prediction that “By 2005, it will become clear that the internets impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machines.

Hes far smarter than I ever will be, says Potts But, hes been very brave and making a lot of claims out loud that, in retrospect, theyve just been laughably wrong.

There are other economists, people like Larry Whiteand others, macro monetary specialists and theorists who provide far more nuanced and sharper critique and are advancing an interesting critique of the space.

 

 

 

 

Scams and fraud

The lack of regulation and a plethora of get-rich-quick investors who dont understand the tech make crypto easy pickings for scammers. This is a driving motivation for critics like the Twitter influencer Mr Whale whose bearish and contrarian takes have seen him amass over 430,000 followers and independent nocoiner journalist Amy Castor. (Both declined to be interviewed for this piece.)

They believe the entire industry is wracked with financial fraud, from the QuadrigaX scandal (involving lost wallet keys, sudden death and an insolvent exchange) to the truth about the stablecoin issuer behind Tether.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

While many journalists in crypto have reservations about Tether, some critics believe that it is an unquestionable fact Tether is unbacked and essentially printed $83 billion in USDT out of thin air.

This appears to be the logic behind Castors most famous and often referenced tweet, which makes no sense from a Bitcoin proponents perspective, but makes total sense if you believe that everything about crypto is manipulated:

When you see the price of Bitcoin hitting new highs like this, it means large holders are cashing outahead of the crash, which they all know is coming.

 

 

Amy Castor
Amy Castors famed tweet that turned into a meme.

 

 

Tether has survived a New York Attorney Generals investigation and court case about its reserves, so if it is a perpetual money printing machine, theyve done very well to keep it going. Of course, given some of the stuff that really does go on in crypto, thats not a non-zero possibility.

Political enemies

As Gerards hatred of Libertarians suggests, a reaction to the perceived politics of Bitcoin is a strong motivation for many. While technology is arguably politically neutral, thats not how crypto critics see it.

David Golumbia wrote The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism, which argues that Bitcoin was borne out of the right-wing conspiratorial Libertarian culture of the Cypherpunks and that the technology itself is inherently right wing.

Ive interviewed Golumbia at length on the subject and found him to be a fascinating and insightful person with deep background knowledge, but even leaving aside the highly contested idea the Cypherpunks were right wing, the contention seems a little bit similar to arguing that because the Volkswagen Beetle was the brainchild of Adolf Hitler (and Ferdinand Porsche) then everyone who drives one must be a Nazi.

Gerard, however, believes the basic thesis is correct and says it informed a chapter of his book. Curiously, he also doesnt think Ethereum fans are any less right wing than Bitcoiners.

ETH is left wing is nonsense. Buterin espouses basic Silicon Valley techno-libertarianism with subtle anarcho-capitalism underneath that pretends to hide its power level. His parents are ardent ancaps and brought him up with this stuff. His main sponsor is Peter Theil. He might be left of the most rabid Bitcoin ancaps, but not of any sort of political spectrum outside the weird world of crypto.

As you might expect, Potts reacts strongly against the characterization of crypto as inherently right wing and says both left and right are involved in crypto as a way to overcome the centralization of power, whether political or monopolistic corporations.

Its both a left-wing and a right-wing story about trying to remove concentrations of power, whether its political power or market power from systems, he says.

The fundamental story of a lot of different people involved in the space and a lot of different political or motivational backgrounds that generally share the same overarching narrative is that we dont like centralization of power. And, we dont like arbitrary control of systems.

The critics are the ones that are defending the status quo. And, I just find it sort of ironic thats the real battle here. I dont see it as a left versus right story, I see it as a protection of the status quo, political hierarchies, versus an attempt to innovate with new institutions. And, I would love the critics to represent that idea.

 

 

 

 

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets