1. Home
  2. Features

Features

The blockchain projects making renewable energy a reality

Much has been said about Bitcoins carbon emissions. Far less has been said about the potential of blockchain to increase the efficiency of renewables by transparently managing supply and demand. Blockchain doesnt pose a threat to the planet its going to play an essential role in helping to bring about a net-zero carbon emission economy.

It is a few years in the future: You are sitting on your sofa, having a nice coffee after loading the washing machine. Youve switched it on but, of course, the Internet of Things-enabled machine checks prices and will run when it hits a cheap electricity window. The Tesla outside in the drive is fully charged, you dont have any plans to go any further than the supermarket today, so the battery is available to sell its energy back to the grid and deposit tokens in your energy wallet if the electricity grid requires power.

Back to today.

Energy and electricity, in particular, are vital to our society. The grim effects on Texas in the 2021 freeze where more than 4.5 million homes and businesses were left in the icy dark, causing misery and 246 deaths showed us how vulnerable all our systems are to trouble with the electricity supply.

 

 

The blockchain projects making renewable energy a reality
Blockchain is an essential part of turning the power grid green.

 

 

In 1882, the first U.S. electricity plant, the Pearl Street Station, started producing power for around 85 customers lights in Manhattan, using DC current. Westinghouse, a rival to Thomas Edisons company, invented AC power and built a big hydropower plant at Niagara Falls to supply electricity to Buffalo, NY. Other developed countries followed suit. The model was a large centralized power plant that, through a grid, sent high voltage electricity to substations and distributed it to residential and business consumers.

This model worked well for more than a century or so. It does, however, rely on large, expensive and centralized power stations fueled by coal, natural gas, hydro or nuclear. Its a top-down structure.

Well, DER

Now we have a new paradigm: In a transition to a decarbonized future, we have lots of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) to deal with. These could be wind or solar generators, but they could also be battery storage, hydrogen fuel cells, smart appliances or electric vehicles. Utility company Dominion Energy, for example, is investing in a fleet of school buses in Fairfax, Virginia.

The Sun Exchange
A solar panel microgrid on a building in South Africa. Source: The Sun Exchange

Twice a day, they will be picking up and dropping off kids. The rest of the time, they sit in the depot to serve as a giant battery for the local power grid. Instead of a few large power stations, soon, we will have a very complex web of producers and consumers. In the old days, if a national grid needed more power, someone flicked a switch and another power plant came online. Conversely, if there was too much, an engineer somewhere shut one down.

Balancing all the loads from different inputs and outputs is much more difficult in a distributed system and requires a lot of AI, data analytics and some sort of transparent, accessible, trusted and un-manipulable accounting system. You might have come across something of this nature. Spoiler: These are blockchain and tokenomics.

The new energy paradigm is a rough beast, slouching to be born, to misquote Irish poet W.B. Yeats. But, we can look at a few pioneers in the field.

 

 

 

 

Distro Port of Rotterdam

Rotterdam in the Netherlands is the largest port in the world, handling incredible amounts of cargo every day. It uses a lot of electricity. BlockLab.nl teamed up with S&P Global Commodity Insights, a giant in the field of commodity trading and analytics, to create Distro, an AI-based trading platform to buy and sell energy from a solar power microgrid on the roofs of buildings within the port complex.

It uses high-frequency trading and blockchain accounting to drive down user costs by 11%, produce returns up 14% and reduce emissions of CO2, according to an in-house analysis released October 5, 2021. The success of this pilot project has generated tremendous interest in replicating this in other places, according to James Rilett, senior director of Innovation at S&P Global Commodity Insights.

 

 

Rotterdam
The Port of Rotterdam. Supplied.

 

 

BlockLab is a multi-disciplinary innovation laboratory that aims to put blockchain technology into practical use by building applications to enhance the global energy transition and optimize global supply chains. It is backed by the Port of Rotterdam and collaborates with leading universities and technology developers.

Janjoost Jullens, energy lead at the BlockLab, met Rilett at an exhibition and there was an immediate exchange of ideas. James Rilett says,

We were already thinking about AI, blockchain, big data and the energy transition. What we wanted to do is bring the best bits of the proven evolution of energy markets to a new technological paradigm.

The Port of Rotterdam backed the project in 2018 with a small amount of pizza money, with the clear direction that it had to be a practical and realizable project, not some vaporware. Distro is a peer-to-peer energy network of consumers and prosumers. That is, users that both generate power and consume it as well. All the energy trading is automated, so there is minimal administration needed.

Its a very innovative and realistic method, Janjoost says. We blend together blockchain,algorithm trading, data engineering and data science a business solution that copes with decentralization.

Blockchain is the special sauce, as James describes it, that ensures that transactions are fair, transparent and reconciled, which is a big issue in the conventional energy trading world.

The platform has hosted 20 million blockchain-validated, cleared and settled transactions. The blockchain lowers the price at which it is sensible to manage microtransactions because its beautiful technology out of the box that helps those transactions clear in a trustful way. It is unique and new to the power market.

They are working on scaling this technology to larger projects. The first will be implemented in the Port of Rotterdam industrial area, which accounts for 35% of the Netherlands entire carbon emissions, and the second is a microgrid development in California.

Another niche use is Shore Power. Docked ships need variable power, usually using diesel generators, and produce fine dust air pollution. Distro is working on replacing this with clean energy supplied by renewables to overcome this problem.

 

 

 

 

Ledger of Power

Australias Powerledger is pushing forward with decentralized markets so that renewable energy generation, storage and purchasing power are harnessed in an optimal way. It aims to expand the use of renewables by using advanced trading between microgrids to ensure that high penetration levels will not cause grid instability.

Ensuring continuity in transmission and distribution is essential with intermittent renewable energy sources to avoid conventional grid failures, including not only blackouts but brownouts, where the grid falls below its operating parameters and causes problems with equipment.

It has already established almost a dozen projects in Australia and various other countries. Powerledger released the Solana-based tokenPOWR on Coinbase and Binance last year.

Jemma Green, Powerledger executive chairman and co-founder, tells Magazine:

What happens is that energy companies often bundle fossil fuel energy into the mix to make up for holes in the supply of intermittent renewable energy.

She believes that storage, including EV batteries and the use of advanced market software, will bridge that gap as more renewables come into the energy mix.

Powerledgers uGrid software is being used in Thailand in project T77 to trade rooftop solar power between an international school, apartment complex, shopping center and dental hospital in Bangkok. This blockchain-based software is the backbone of the peer-to-peer trading system that enables energy distribution within the community. This is cheaper than the grid and reduces emissions because the generation is local and not from a distant power station. The key technology is a blockchain app that trades energy between participants rapidly to get the best price in a microsecond-by-microsecond fluctuating market of supply and demand.

 

 

 

 

Powerledger is working on 30 projects in 11 countries, so these different energy technologies are being put through their paces to validate their performance. Green says:

People are, understandably, apprehensive about any new technology, but blockchain is the building block for a whole new internet. It’s a whole new era where you can take the suns rays and turn it into a currency.

There is a lot of potential for these projects across the developing world, perhaps in the way that smartphone banking applications leapfrogged the Western concept of high street banks and went straight to mobile users in Africa and Asia.

Justin Sun not involved

Across Asia, numerous other projects harnessing sustainable energy and blockchain are being implemented. Launched in 2015, The Sun Exchanges micro-leasing marketplace in South Africa brings individual and corporate energy investors to off-grid energy development. Tokens are a way to finance a project without going down the route of conventional capital, which not all projects can.

Blockchain can also be valuable for measuring, recording and verifying greenhouse gas emissions. ECO2 Ledger uses blockchain technology to make carbon credit data more reliable and traceable in the voluntary carbon market in China, where individuals can track their carbon emissions on the MyCarbon app and trade with those who need carbon credits. Launched in mid-November 2019, it quickly accumulated over 500,000 users, with its website claiming to have traded 100,000 tons of carbon credit.

MyCarbon
MyCarbon Phone App. Source: ECO2 Ledger

Trading in Renewable Energy Certificates (called by various names in different markets) is important. The production, trade, distribution and consumption of renewable energy can be electronically documented and tracked with this method, creating carbon credits for verifiable carbon generation. In the developed world, this is an established and regulated market. In the developing world, where it is often voluntary, there can be a lot of issues: transparency of tracking, fraud and unacceptable transaction costs.

Swiss-based Energy Web Foundation (EWF) is a nonprofit founded in 2017 that is developing publicly available and decentralized solutions designed specifically for the energy sector. EWFs Energy Web Origin (EW Origin) is a suite of open-source and fully customizable software tools for building blockchain platforms for easy and efficient renewable energy sourcing in line with the existing standards and regulations.

They have projects in Thailand, Turkey and El Salvador. Mercados Elctricos16 (MERELEC), an electricity trading corporation operating across Mexico and Central America, is executing a pilot platform to assess a business case for the technical feasibility of a blockchain-based regional carbon credit trading marketplace. This is a fledgling project, started in 2019, and it has not been without challenges. Data acquisition has been a problem due to the diversity of devices. Lack of understanding of blockchain has been another. As these credits are voluntary, there seems to have been a lack of customers. But, good projects will overcome early difficulties.

 

 

EZ Blockchain
EZ Blockchains mobile bitcoin mining center in operation at a power plant. Source: EZ Blockchain

 

A flare for flares

A lot of natural gas is lost, being flared (burned) instead of being used. It is potentially hazardous and often uneconomic to process and sell. This is very wasteful. EZ Blockchain, founded in the United States in 2017 by Sergii Gerasymovych, uses this waste gas. He explains, We utilize that energy, convert it into electricity and mine Bitcoin. The companys product is a mobile data center that can be put on a gas site and use surplus gas to generate power a neat trick.

There is a lot of energy in the power grid that is wasted. If there is excess power in the grid, we use it to mine Bitcoin. If there is a shortage, then our data center shuts down. Its balancing supply and demand.

The company is running flat out and installing new mining data centers every day. It has over 60 operating in the U.S. and Canada, some directly owned by EZ Blockchain, others by the energy companies themselves. They are building around a dozen more each month and are hooking their data centers up to renewable microgrids.

Our company is focused very much on incentivizing renewable energy, Sergii says.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

What I mean by that is renewable energy such as wind or solar requires a consistent user of power in order to be profitable. So, with the help of batteries, solar panels or wind turbines and cryptocurrency mining as a constant load, we can provide the companies that invested in renewable assets a much quicker return on investment. It can use the excess energy instead of being shut down when the wind blows, but there is not enough demand.

He adds:

The future is bright but there is a lot of work. We are at the stage where we are massively expanding. We literally hired ten people last week. So, the companys growing exponentially.

Putting the pieces together

Decentralized energy systems local and low carbon are the way forward for energy transmission and distribution. Couple that with IoT, AI, machine learning, big data and other technological innovations, as well as much more granular user control, a decentralized financial and accounting system will be required to ensure transparency, security and accountability. Theres really only one technology that fits the bill: blockchain.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

You don’t need to be angry about NFTs

NFTs are blamed for everything from tacky art to economic inequality and environmental destruction. But, the arguments by critics dont add up, writes Something Interestings Knifefight.

For every minute you are angry, you lose sixty seconds of happiness.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Toward the end of January, one of my favorite content producers on the internet Dan Olson (aka Folding Ideas) published a video titled Line Goes Up The Problem with NFTs outlining his complaints about nonfungible tokens, or NFTs. At the time of writing,Line Goes Up has accumulated over six million views almost twice as many views as his next most successful video. Thats an impressive reach for a 2.5 hour documentary with very little marketing behind it.

In the film, Olson lays out the following argument:

  1. Cryptocurrency is useless except to sell to a greater fool.
  2. NFTs, DAOs and play-to-earn games are just ways to find more fools.
  3. The fools who buy in become accomplices in marketing the scam.
  4. NFTs are ugly, centralized, pointless, exploit artists and damage the environment.

To be honest, the movie bums me out. It is not because Olson doesnt like NFTs it is perfectly reasonable not to like NFTs. It bums me out because one of my favorite things about the Folding Ideas canon was how much sympathy he brought to previous subjects. Consider how hard Olson worked to humanize flat earthers or 50 Shades of Gray. In contrast, Olson describes NFTs as incomprehensibly tasteless and cryptocurrency enthusiasts as terrible people with poor judgment and low social literacy. He calls Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin a butthurt warlock. He summarizes the entire space as Amway but with ugly ass ape cartoons.

In short, NFTs make Olson angry. He is not alone.

 

 

 

 

To be clear, I agree with a lot of Olsons criticisms of the space. It attracts gamblers, fraudsters and fools. Motivated reasoning and dishonest marketing are everywhere. I have written extensively about what I think are the fatal flaws of Ethereum,I am very skeptical of DAOs and I dont think the current generation of P2E games is compelling.

Olson describes a lot of examples of shitty behavior and, for the most part, they are accurate descriptions there are certainly plenty of similar examples that he could have used to make the same points. The history of crypto is littered with failed projects and overt scams.

 

 

 

 

The problem is not that Olson is wrong about the examples he identifies, the problem is that he is wrong about the conclusion he draws. Some people misunderstand cryptocurrency, but that doesnt make cryptocurrency useless. Some people make bad art with NFTs, but that doesnt make NFTs bad art. Explaining the value of NFTs by finding the worst possible examples of how they are used is like explaining the value of the internet by making a list of the worst possible websites.

Olson sampled the NFT projects he describes by accepting random spam discord invites roughly like evaluating average website quality by clicking on every spam email link. Its a foolish way to measure average quality and average quality is a foolish thing to measure in the first place. The quality of the average website doesnt really mean anything and doesnt matter anyway what matters is the quality of the websites you choose to interact with. The same is true of NFTs.

 

 

 

There is no such thing as NFT art

A common complaint about NFTs is that they are ugly. In Line Goes Up, Olson describes them as fugly, garish and incredibly cringeworthy. But, to anyone who understands NFTs, it is immediately obvious that the criticism makes no sense. Not just because art is subjective and no one has the authority to dismiss a genre of art as unworthy, but because NFTs are not a genre of art at all. NFTs dont look like anything. They can be associated with literally any visuals or with no visuals at all. NFTs arent a style of art, they are a tool that artists can use.

There are NFTs for portrait photography, generative art, songs, virtual real estate, poems, memes, mood stones, video game items, financial contracts and athletic accomplishments. There is even an NFT that represents a work of 1010×1010 transparent pixels arranged recursively. Anyone who tells you that NFTs are ugly is telling you more about the limits of their imagination than about the limits of NFTs. It is like someone who has only ever watched Marvel films confidently asserting that movies are inherently unrealistic.

 

 

Knifefight
Take a dog to a Knifefight.

 

 

Cryptocurrency is useful thats why people use it

Olson opens Line Goes Up with a description of the 2008 mortgage crisis and how Bitcoin emerged from it. His criticisms of Bitcoin are weak but are mostly not relevant to the argument he is making about NFTs if you are curious to explore the case for Bitcoin in greater detail, I recommend Letter to a Bitcoin Skeptic. It is interesting, though, to examine the broad strokes of the argument he makes because it is symbolic of how he misunderstands NFTs. According to Olson, Bitcoin does not solve anything. As he puts it:

Crypto does nothing to address 99% of the problems with the banking industry, because those are problems of human behavior. They are incentives, they are social structures, they are modalities. The problem is what people are doing to others not that the building they are doing it in has the word bank on the outside.

It is true that Bitcoin does not eliminate banks or the excesses of capitalism but, in fairness, I am not aware of any technology that does that. The idea that Bitcoin was meant to eliminate banks is a weirdly ahistorical strawman argument. Satoshi himself talked about how banks would use Bitcoin. The purpose of Bitcoin was never to fix every problem in the economy it was to make it impossible to debase wealth or censor transactions. Reasonable people can disagree about whether those problems are worth solving, but Bitcoin does solve them.

Bitcoin may seem useless to Olson, but it is useful to Alexei Navalny and the political opposition to Putin. It is useful to citizens of countries with struggling local currencies like Nigeria, Venezuela and Turkey and to ordinary people trying to flee Ukraine and Russia. It is useful to feminist protestors in Africa who were debanked by their governments and to women in Afghanistan who are not allowed bank accounts at all. Olson calls Bitcoin the hobbyhorse of a few hundred thousand gambling addicts, perhaps because he does not know that Coinbase alone has millions of active users worldwide.

 

 

Bored Apes
NFTs are not bad art. In fact, theyre not art at all.

 

 

You dont have to believe that Bitcoin is good to believe some people find it useful. But, anyone claiming that Bitcoin is useless is ignoring the many ways it is already being used. Line Goes Up keeps returning to variations on this flawed approach: Olson lays out a problem he says NFTs were meant to solve, shows how that problem isnt solved and then concludes that NFTs are therefore useless without examining why people are actually using them.

NFTs are not pointless, they are pointers

Olson argues that NFTs are pointless because they do not work as advertised. The images they reference can be lost or replaced. The same image can be minted into more than one token or into tokens on more than one chain. NFTs dont prove that the token creator was the artist and they dont stop anyone else from having access to the image even without the token. Olson (correctly) points out that NFTs are not useful for proving authenticity and then (incorrectly) concludes that they arent useful at all.

NFTs cannot prove the authenticity of art because authenticity is a subjective assessment by the audience, not a quality of the art itself. Different people can disagree about which version of a work of art is the most authentic or how much authenticity should matter. There is no technology that can prove authenticity because authenticity is not a technical property. That was never the point of NFTs.

 

 

 

 

What NFTs can prove is who made the token, who has held it and who owns it now. Olson explains that isnt the same as authenticity but that doesnt make it worthless. Documenting provenance for fine art is an expensive and valuable service despite its limitations.NFTs can provide the same service with much stronger guarantees.

When viewed through that lens, it becomes clear as to why the critiques above are not interesting. Some NFTs have malleable images, some have permanent images and some have no images at all. Whether there are images and whether they can change is not a property of NFTs is the result of choices made by the artists. Concluding that NFTs are useless because the artist might surprise you with their choices is like concluding that paintings are useless because Banksy shredded one at an auction once.

There is nothing evil about Etsy

Of course, the argument that NFTs are pointless and bad art would be incomplete by itself because there is lots of pointless and bad art in the world there is nothing wrong with that. Two-thirds of Etsy would qualify as pointless and bad but no one would make (or watch) a two-hour-long documentary about it. Arguing that NFTs are not good is not enough. Olsons real argument is that NFTs are bad. He argues that NFTs are bad for three reasons:

  1. NFTs are harmful to the environment
  2. NFTs are dangerous to users
  3. NFTs exploit artists

Lets consider them one at a time.

The environmental impact of JPEGs

The environmental impact of cryptocurrencies, in general, is a large and complicated topic that we dont have space to do justice to here. If you are interested, Ive written in greater detail about the energy impact of Bitcoin mining and why we dont need to be alarmed by it. But, for the sake of argument, lets suppose that proof-of-work mining was bad for the environment. What would that mean for NFTs?

How much energy miners spend to validate the network is a function of how much money they make mining the better miners are paid, the more willing they are to mine. Anything that increases miner revenue will increase the network’s energy footprint, and anything that decreases miner revenue will reduce that energy footprint. To reduce the environmental footprint of proof-of-work mining, make mining less profitable.

When users trade NFTs back and forth they pay transaction fees to miners, which somewhat increases the revenue for mining. But, those fees are in proportion to how often/urgently NFTs move, not to how valuable they are. For example, the most expensive NFT collection at the moment, Bored Ape Yacht Club, has generated around200 transactions a day since its launch. For context, Ethereum processes around 1.2 million transactions per day.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

On the other hand, NFTs are priced in ETH so anyone buying an NFT is selling ETH. When a lot of NFTs go up in price that means a lot of people are selling ETH, and a lot of people selling ETH pushes the pricedown. Miners are paid in ETH, so anything that puts pressure on the price of ETH is putting pressure on their revenue. In other words, every time an NFT project goes up in price it is actually bad news for Ethereum miners. Want to discourage people from mining Ethereum? Buy some monkey JPEGs.

Of course, the real story is more complex. NFTs get a lot of mainstream attention, which attracts more users to Ethereum. Different NFT projects will have different prices and create different transaction volumes. Even the same project may look different over time as it evolves. Anyone who tells you a simple story about an economic system is oversimplifying. But, NFTs are only one part of a large and complicated ecosystem, and it is far from clear whether they make mining more profitable or less overall.

 

 

Pixelmon
Pixelmon raised $70 million and this is the best one.

 

Dont confuse tools with the hands that wield them

Over the course of Line Goes Up, Olson swings back and forth between contempt for the people who own NFTs and a paternalistic fear of being taken advantage of by scams and fraud. He cant seem to decide whether hed rather blame the technology or the user base. Personally, I think we should blame the scammers. Frauds and scams predate NFTs and would be here in a world where NFTs never existed.

Overpromising naive investors and pocketing their money is nothing new and didnt particularly transform when scammers started adopting NFTs. Fyre Festival didnt need NFTs and neither did WeWork. The (still) unlaunched MMORPG Star Citizen raised more than $400 million since its initial Kickstarter in 2012 before NFTs even existed. There are definitely scammers using NFTs to execute old playbooks in a new market, but NFTs arent really enabling anything new or different about the scams. NFTs are just a trend scammers are attaching themselves to.

Part of the fear here seems to stem from a technical misunderstanding where Olson claims that NFTs can contain hostile code that will live in your wallet forever like a landmine that is fundamentally not the case at all. NFTs dont contain code and they dont exist anywhere. When someone sends you an NFT, what actually happens is that a record is sent to the blockchain that causes the smart contract for that NFT to give your address new permissions.

Nothing is put anywhere and the NFT itself is just a record written into the blockchain, not a payload of potentially dangerous code. The goal of scammers who send unsolicited NFTs is not to inject code, it is to convince victims to go to an attackers website and sign a malicious transaction. An NFT like this is like a spam email that lures victims to a phishing site its not the attack itself. Its just the bait.

Olson (correctly) observes that bad people are using NFTs and then presents that as evidence that NFTs must be bad but, that is the wrong conclusion. Bad people use lots of tools that good people use, too. Drug dealers use dollars, terrorists have cell phones and Hitler wore pants. When bad people use a technology, all that tells you is that the technology must be useful.

 

 

Beeple
Sure, Beeples Everydays may not actually be worth $69 million, but what is?

 

Lots of artists have made money with NFTs

The last major argument that Olson makes against NFTs in Line Goes Up is the idea that NFTs are actually bad for artists. Thats a commonly held belief, but it is also an extraordinary one given that the third-highest paid living artist of all time (Beeple with $69 million) made his money almost exclusively from selling NFTs.

Olsons argument is that the Beeple sale shouldnt count because a buyer of Beeple,MetaKovan,is also the creator of a fractionalized Beeple token called B20. Thats a funny argument for a couple of reasons. First, regardless of how sincere you think the valuation was, Beeple received $69 million of actual money. This sale was undeniably good for the artist.

Second, if you look at the relative valuation of B20 and Beeples $69 million-worth Everdays NFT, there is absolutely no way that MetaKovan turned a profit by flipping B20 tokens. There was just never enough volume to make that profitable. So, it is reasonable to think MetaKovan might have been biased, but it was ultimately MetaKovan who paid for the bid.

Finally, another bidder was ready to pay that price:Justin Sun of the Tron network posted a video of him trying to outbid the winner but hitting a website error. So, even if you ignore MetaKovan entirely, there was still a buyer ready to pay $69 million to Beeple for the Everydays NFT. $69 million may be a surprising price, but it was real.

Olson uses the example of the Beeple/MetaKovan sale to build toward a broader claim that most sales in the NFT space are wash trades, where the seller buys from themselves to fake interest or price in their art. To someone unfamiliar with NFT markets, that might seem like a legitimate concern, but it is pretty naive to anyone who knows the space. A little more investigation into the mechanics of the proposed trades would have made that obvious.

 

 

 

 

OpenSea charges a 2.5% fee per transaction plus miner fees, so wash trading is quite expensive. NFTs are also subject to capital gains taxes, so anyone creating fake profit for themselves is also creating very real tax obligations. Its also largely pointless it is much easier and cheaper to fake Discord and Twitter activity for a new project that hasnt launched yet than market volume for a project that has. There is a lot of shadiness in NFT markets, but there isnt that much wash trading.

That means most of that money is really going to the project creators, which is why so many artists like Beeple have found NFTs to be a lucrative new opportunity. Olson asserts without evidence that most artists have lost money in NFTs, but it is hard to see how. Minting NFTs has always been cheap to do and, more recently, has become possible to do for free. Not everyone finds the NFT market is lucrative for them, but making NFTs that never end up selling is not expensive. If an artist is losing money in NFTs, its as a buyer not as a seller.

Stolen NFTs dont make sense

So, artists who sell their own work are benefiting from NFTs but what about the artists who havent or dont want to create NFTs? Art theft has been so rampant in NFT markets that DeviantArt had to launch a dedicated tool for detecting stolen art and issuing takedown notices. Doesnt that mean that NFTs are being used to exploit artists?

Art theft is reprehensible but blaming NFTs for stolen art is like blaming RedBubble piracy on the existence of t-shirts. The problem is the theft of art, not the medium stolen art is sold on. NFTs dont make art any easier to steal and they dont make stolen art more valuable. In fact, NFTs are actually less useful to thieves: It is impossible to distinguish between a print sold by the artist and one sold by a pirate, but it is possible to know conclusively who created which NFT. Anyone who cares about whether they are buying the authentic version will buy the original and anyone who doesnt can mint their own version for free. The art thief doesnt have anything useful to sell.

Stolen NFTs make very little sense. They are like buying a certificate of authenticity from someone who has no authority to issue them, like John Cleeses NFT of the Brooklyn Bridge except less funny:

 

 

 

 

More sophisticated scammers dont focus on selling stolen art so much as using stolen art to sell a broader scam, like pretending it is concept art from an upcoming video game. But, just like more primitive RedBubble pirates, the problem is the art theft and fraud not the specific thing fraudsters trick their marks into overvaluing. NFTs arent critical to the scam at all, they are just a way of getting the attention of a group of wealthy potential targets.

No one needs to be angry about NFTs

To be clear, I am not arguing that everyone should understand or value nonfungible tokens. It is entirely reasonable to not care about them and not understand why other people do either. But, I dont think anyone should be upset about NFTs and I think Line Goes Up is a particularly good example of how that misunderstanding happens.

Throughout the movie, Olson blames NFTs for everything from tacky art to economic inequality. The result isnt a coherent argument against NFTs so much as a long list of things Olson dislikes about the world and personally associates with NFTs. Guilt by association has led him to the wrong conclusions. NFTs dont cause scams, theft or ecological disaster. They are good for artists and often genuinely loved by collectors. Theyre not bad art because they are not a type of art at all. They are a tool artists can use.

NFTs are not the final boss of late-stage capitalism. Theyre just a file type. If youve never been angry about JPEGs, then you dont need to be angry about JPEGs people can own.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

How do you DAO? Can DAOs scale and other burning questions

DAO: Decentralized. Autonomous. Organization.

The whole phrase is a misnomer. Theyre not decentralized, not autonomous and they are not organizations, Monsterplay blockchain consultancy founder David Freuden tells Magazine.

Freuden co-authored a 51-page report on DAOs in May 2020 in an attempt to help realize their potential.We need DAOs, he explains. The idea of shareholder first is only a 1980s/1990s concept. Companies became about profits, not products.

He foresaw big things for DAOs and much has changed nearly two years later. By the end of 2021, DAOs had more than 1.6 million participants, up from just 13,000 at the start of the previous year. In 2021, the US state of Wyoming legislated for legal recognition of DAOs and theMarshall Islands.In 2022, Australia isconsidering doing the same.

Yeah, but what is a DAO?

In short, a DAO is a governance model popularized in the decentralized finance sector where members buy (or are rewarded with) governance tokens to vote on how the DAO operates and spends its money. DAOs were born from DeFi as an investment vehicle. So, you cant separate a DAO from tokenomics, says Freuden.

DAOs are usually built around a mission which can be a promise or a social cause but usually still involves a desire for profits. If you cant answer the why the DAO wont be sustainable, he says. And, if you dont have tokenomics, its a co-op, not a DAO.

DAOs come in a range of types that now include operating system DAOs, protocol DAOs, investment DAOs, grant DAOs, service DAOs, social DAOs, collector DAOs and media DAOs.

The idea that people could be galvanized around a good cause was very attractive to Freuden. The crypto world comprises speculators or builders, so crypto needs a DAO for the builders.

But, one problem is that mismatched expectations among speculators and builders or both cause endless but, sometimes creative, friction.

 

 

How do you DAO? Can DAOs scale and other burning questions
How do you DAO?

 

Productivity coordination organisms

For DAOs, the idea is usually to launch the DAO with an original product, such as a cryptocurrency, an IT protocol or a VC-like investment fund like FlamingoDAO. DAOs allow for tokenized and incentivized distributed open-source contributions without borders. Product or mission is key. Sometimes, this happens in reverse and DAOs emerge once a product is launched, leaving the company to eventually transition to a DAO, like Uniswap eventually did.

A well-coordinated DAO can get things done. So, its a vehicle for a distributed incentivized workforce. Essentially, DAOs are something like productivity coordination organisms.

DAOs incentivize merit-based contributions. Those who work for the DAO make permissionless contributions and enjoy fragmented employment benefiting from task descriptions, not job descriptions, argues Freuden. So, DAOs are, above all else, a new way of organizing cooperation.

DAO? Distributed not decentralized

In decentralized autonomous organizations, each word can be interpreted differently. DAOs can emphasize one aspect or at the expense of another. Decentralization is a trade-off for autonomy and vice-versa.

Matan Field, CEO at DAOstack, has long argued that a DAO is a distributed governance system. Power is distributed collectively. Yet, the decentralized aspects of a DAO can be understood by two different factors. This sheds light on the conflicting definitions of a DAO.

 

A DAO can be decentralized because it runs on a decentralized infrastructure. For example, it could be created on a public permissionless blockchain so that another party cannot take over.

 

A DAO is distributed because its not organized hierarchically around executives or shareholders. There is no concentration of power around its leadership.

 

Option two is clearly distributed rather than decentralized.

Yet, not all of these endeavors are automated.

Autonomous: Think quorum, not robot

Think of a quorum rather than a robot. DAOs can be autonomous in the sense that the most profound characteristics of a smart contract are self-enforcing and self-executory capabilities. Thus, every transaction on a blockchain is technically a simplified version of a smart contract.

Dao landscape
The DAO landscape is growing more complicated.

For example, keep in mind how smart contracts work on the Ethereum network. They are less like legal contracts and more like lines of self-executing computer code described as persistent scripts by Vitalik Buterin.

A DAO, however, is autonomous in the sense that its rules are self-enforcedonce agreed upon by its members. So, a DAO is not fully automated but automated upon approval by the governance committee.This can differentiate them from traditional organizations whose rules form guidelines that someone must interpret and apply.

Why a DAO? They move fast

A DAO can adapt quickly to local conditions as a quick way to spin up a governance mechanism. Its a knowledge coordination tool to make decisions collectively and fast.

Like UkraineDAO, spun up rapidly by Ukrainian expat Alona Shevchenko, Nadya Tolokonnikova, founder of Russian feminist punk band Pussy Riot, artist Trippy Labs and digital artist collective PleasrDAO, in response to Putins invasion of Ukraine. The DAO quickly sought to support Ukrainian charities by selling NFTs of the Ukrainian flag. This is the perfect use case for a DAO: a single mission, moving fast and raising funds for a country accepting crypto where trust in banks is low.

This could be a watershed moment for DAOs.

 

 

 

 

For Freuden, like many, ConstitutionDAO was another clever use case for DAOs. ConstitutionDAOwas an ultimately unsuccessful but beautiful experiment in a single-purpose DAO to buy a copy of the U.S. Constitution for public viewing from a Sothebys auction. ConstitutionDAO raised $47 million dollars from 19,000 people in just one week in November 2021, but was outbid by a hedge fund manager.

Contributions were returned or lost if transactional gas fees were too high. Yet, as a beautiful experiment, a Special Vehicle DAO like the ConstitutionDAO proved exceptionally fast at organizing and crowdsourcing funds for a specific purpose.

Soon, we may all be lauding the success of UkraineDAOs geopolitical ambitions in support of the DAO concept.

For Adam Miller, founder of DAOplatform.io and MIDAO Directory Services, some of the best use cases for DAOs today are where a DAO structure is part of the raison d’tre.

That is, a flat community is key to the venture. A good example is crowdsourced product development. Miller tells Magazine that DAOs are most likely to succeed when members are excited about a DAO as an alternative to starting a company. He agrees that distributed is better for the acronym because DAOs still need some kind of hierarchy.

For Miller, DAOs are also a new way of organizing people and, importantly, resources. He started DAOplatform.io, a DAO tooling advisery that is currently transitioning to a DAO due to the woeful tech options for running a DAO, which he says mainly comprises of just multisig admin keys and a voting system. So, today, he is trying to advise on the best tech stacks for DAOs.

There are three key elements, according to Miller.

Firstly, tokenization for which there are many methods and tools. Secondly, governance mechanisms, on chain or off chain, and connected to the DAOs treasury. And, finally, community.

How a typical DAO works

DAOs can become more than just a glorified Discord group but only if theres a clear mission. That mission is inevitably part financial speculation part utopian dream. The spectrum can vary greatly.

The Dash DAO was created because the founder left the cryptocurrency project in 2017. Its the story of a prophet who never anointed a successor. So, building a tokenized evangelical missionary community that was distributed around the world through a DAO made sense.

Dashs founder Evan Duffield was a libertarian/anarchist visionary who forked Bitcoin in January 2014 to make it instant and essentially free, or with negligible gas fees. He disappeared for a while, and so DASH organically transitioned to a DAO.

Today, 200,000 U.S. retail locations including Walmart and Barnes and Noble accept Dash so that purchasers can use crypto in retail settings. This payment system operates on gift card rails like any other gifted voucher.

DAO tools
There are increasing numbers of DAO tools available. (Source: Coinyuppie)

Dash is the first successful DAO, according to DASH Corp Co (the legal entity for the DAO) Dash head of crypto, DAO and blockchain marketing, Arden Goldstein. By contrast,The DAO, the first actual DAO, was founded in 2016 and disbanded after a hack, an Ethereum hard fork and many controversies. But, what are the metrics for success?

In crypto, the measures for success are different, says Goldstein. But, a healthy DAO is where people participate or are incentivized to work toward common goals. A successful DAO is when people are incentivized to complete a task. And, crucially, when tasks get completed.

Voting, yes or no, 1 or 0, is not the newest concept. The challenge is getting people to continue to participate and keep building a community. A DAO incentivizes volunteers: Nothing is holding people there to build. The DAO philosophy isnt anything new. You need to have skin in the game to participate.

DAO members must stake 1000 Dash to become a MasterNode. Those members are incentivized to do marketing (and other tasks) for DASH rewards. Its basically an outsourced team for its onboarding of new users around the world.

Part of the fun of joining a DAO is encountering the countless crazy or very active people on Discord. No one gets fired (usually). But, in-line with open-source coding communities, you can be offered a full-time job if your work is noticed.

DAO community members all over the world are incentivized to build the brand. And, Dash is a very useful product for developing countries, where inflation is high and governments are undemocratic. According to wallet downloads, the highest concentrations of Dash DAO members are Russia, Brazil, Venezuela, India, China, France, Italy and the Philippines.

Grassroots activism means thatthis DAO makes sense. A DAO relies on local knowledge. For example, Dash.org is blocked in Venezuela, so DAO members help people use a VPN. DAO members are investors, energized evangelicals and also local expert product distributors.

There is a Dash platform for submitting proposals and grant applications which are voted on every month. But, the DAO can decide at any time not to fund you. For example, it once employed a PR firm and the community said not enough press was getting published, so the DAO pulled the funding. This raises a great question: How are real-world contractual obligations met by a DAO?

 

 

 

 

Does the DASH DAO work?

Sometimes, I see the DAO de-fund projects I saw a lot of value in, Goldstein explains. As a full-time employee, I still have to put in a funding proposal. But, with monthly votes, it is still much faster than other companies Ive worked on.

The Dash DAO community sees itself as a headless beast. There is a CEO of the corporate entity overseeing the project DASH Core Group, Ryan Taylor. But, he himself is subject to the decisions of the DAO. He oversees the tech development, investment arm and incubator. Yet, the DAO community will lose it if any press ever says Dash CEO Ryan Taylor.

The problem is that we dont know who holds the most tokens [] because you dont know who your customers are or who your investors are. However, the loudest voices usually dont have the most MasterNodes and are not the most invested, so they yell and scream the loudest to offset that power imbalance.

On the other hand, Goldstein says she worked hard as the only female in the DAO. I was proud of the DAO when I turned the logo pink for a day and received a great outpouring of support from the men in the DAO. This has yet to entice a major influx of female DAO members.

Like the Kibbutz, communism or even the space race, utopian dreams face a great many hurdles.

Governance problems remain

How can DAOs deal with bad behavior by major token holders?

In early February, a heated debate in crypto Twitter touched on inclusion, diversity and cancel culture over a number of incidents related to decentralized projects. Again, this spotlight on founding teams raised the question of how a DAO addresses any alleged inappropriate behavior.

In a corporation, misconduct can result in termination. In a DAO, founders usually hold a large number of tokens and the keys to the blockchain (multisignature) or otherwise.

The conversation was sparked by derogatory comments made by Brantly Millegan, the director of operations of Ethereum Name Service (ENS), about the LGBTQ community and other controversial topics. The screenshotted comments were made in 2016 and were brought to the attention of the board of the not-for-profit behind ENS in early 2022.

His contract was terminated with the legal entity linked to ENS. But, what about his large holding of DAOs governance tokens?

 

 

Build your own DAO
DAOs have enormous potential but plenty of limitations too.

 

 

Members of the DAO put forward a motion to its members, or those that hold tokens to vote on key decisions, to remove Millegan. Yet, he is a delegate that holds 370,000 votes that were delegated to him. He is the largest delegate in the DAO itself and remains so today.

So, what would have happened if he refused to accept the DAOs decision?

The answer is not that simple, according to Freuden.

Do the members of a DAO have a right to throw someone out that built the project?

Yet, if the original mission is no longer viable, they should be dissolved. When a DAO fails, do they give the money back and dissolve themselves? They should. Give back the money with interest like a prenuptial for a marriage that fails.

One relevant analogy is that VCs might seek to remove a problematic CEO before an IPO.

While treasury is one governance mechanism deployed by DAOs, they are usually (at least for an initial period) controlled by the people that built the original project. Or, in the case of Uniswap, venture capital firm a16z controls so much of the voting power thatit delegated various parcels to student-run blockchain organizations in order to gain a semblance of distribution.

This leads to the question of whether DAOs can truly work at scale. And, how to evolve these voting paradigms beyond token holdings?

There are some solutions for the whale token holder problem. Multiple tokens, for example, a utility token on top of a governance token and quadratic votingfor whales have become one such mechanism. There are also other protections such as multisignatures keys to a blockchain and time locks on decisions that leave time for any automated decision to eventuate. Each DAO will need to get the structure right depending on the assets at stake.

In truth, voter participation is often itself a bigger issue.

Can DAO governance work at scale?

Participation is also very low in many DAOs. This is likely due to not understanding the tech, apathy or members busy lives. The bigger the DAO, the smaller the number of voters that vote, thats apathy but also culture, says Freuden.

Freudens report cites Dunbars Law, a British anthropologist, who argued that people can only maintain a total of about 150 relationships, noting that:

The larger the DAO gets, the less influence the individual exercises, as their perception of their voting power becomes diminished or inconsequential once the individual becomes a smaller part of a large group. This can be seen via Dunbars Rule and the Ringelmann Effect, which states that members of a group become lazier, disenfranchised and more detached as the size of their group increases.

Freuden says that we need to understand how humans relate to operate a DAO. For this reason, he believes DAOs may work best as an investment fund vehicle, rooted in Cryptoland and function better if small in scale. SyndicateDAO, for example, enabled the creationof 450 new investment group DAOs in just three weeks.

For example, FlamingoDAO, a celebrated NFT curation investment DAO, had a maximum of 100 investors due to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions regulations. The so-called LAO is a member-directed venture capital fund and a registered LLC in the United States. They have limited membership to only 100 members in compliance with U.S. Securities law with a 120ETH minimum staking contribution.

Still, how were investment decisions made by FlamingoDAO? Did all 70-odd members have a say regularly? Art and NFTs are highly speculative.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Thus, there is a belief that investment DAOs work well in the small petri-dish environment. This is due to pooled capital (a max of 7% contributions per member) and crowd-sourced knowledge in a crypto-native club.

While scalability may be an issue, every DAO will operate differently depending on the aim, the stage of tech development and the personalities within. Tech people are accustomed to meet ups and hackathons for collaborating around a cause or exploratory idea. But, someone or something still organizes the hack.

Mass voting via holographic consensus

However, there are lots of clever people working on creative solutions to every problem.

DAOplatform.ios Miller cites DXdao, as an example of a successful DAO. DXdao is a collective that builds and governs decentralized products and services and runs the DAO completely on-chain. You earn governance rights by contributing to the community and must keep contributing to keep voting.

DXdao, a fork of DAOstack, also deploys a system of economic curation of proposals known asholographic consensus, a voting algorithm invented by DAOstack founder Matan Field. The system allows a random or semi-random subset to make decisions for the group as a whole.

DXdaos Luke Keenan explains to Magazine that a small predictions market economy emerges around the likely outcome of a proposal as tokens are staked on it, which increases the potential influence of the issue by acting as a gatekeeper for voters. Additionally, proposals that have been given a financial incentive (boosted) have fewer prerequisites to be considered successful, resulting in increased system efficiency. DXdao makes decisions by removing voting power as an economic incentive.

Field, noting that scalable DAOs are indeed my focus, explains that the main point is that holographic consensus does not require a quorum to render a vote valid.

Rather, it provides a different parallel process to do so. This other parallel process is a prediction game played (for profit) by the predictors who can be anyone and not particularly voters they can even be A.I. bots who make predictions about whether a certain vote will be eventually approved or not by the voters. If, for a long enough period of time, enough stake is being placed over the prediction that the vote will be approved, then the voting process is considered valid, even when the voting quorum is low.

In other words, a quorum is not a resilient strategy for DAO governance at scale, says Field.

So, you dont need large votes on every issue. If only 5% votes, thats fine. But, if the proposal moves a significant amount of value or makes a significant change, you require a longer, say a 30 day, voting period and a higher quorum,says Miller.

Clearly, the DAO space is maturing. Theres less of a focus on voter turnout and more of a focus on tools like Orca and processes that mean power is delegated to smaller sub-DAOs, committees and working groups.

Miller also argues that studies in psychology show that if you reward people too much for participating in a volunteer activity, then you disincentivize them. So, depending on what your DAO does and what type of contributions you are looking for, you may want to offer symbolic rewards such as POAPs or contributor levels, rather than focusing on giving out tokens for every activity.

Free lunches offer less intrinsic rewards. Random rewards can provide more incentive.

Link between culture and incentivization

One thing that DAOs can do (and Web3 generally), is to reward early-stage users a product with effective ownership. They encourage early participation and bootstrapping before there are network effects, at least in theory.

For Goldstein, DAOs are a double-edged sword. They ferment evangelical communities in the developing world and may not be fully-scalable, period.

There always has to be a leader somehow, she says. If people dont want to volunteer for any given task, they wont.

Sometimes, DAO members have a feeling of ownership or entitlement. They are not the boss, but they feel that they should be able to see my calendar or that I should provide a daily report on my workday, complains Goldstein. I own three MasterNodes and I demand to know X, Y and Z, they may say.

As with most decentralized projects, having strong community leaders to influence the culture is paramount.

Freuden notes that the the DAOs community builder is the influencer of cryptoland. They disseminate the DAOs culture, the cause and rally the troops and also need to speak in English, not tech.

They need to keep member spirits high.

So, the community builders role is crucial. Building a community around a coin that promises riches might be easy, but keeping the DAO members motivated as tech development stalls is essential.

This is a human task. But, there is a lot of focus on tools that measure contributions and then allocate tokens such as SourceCred or coordinate. Many DAOs also have large growth funds/community funds/grant programs that seek to incentivize development and get things done.

 

 

 

 

The Future?

Maybe all DAOs need is a critical mass of onboarding, committed volunteers to emerge and a legendary community builder to herd the flock.

DAOs are unique for their ability to bring together a passionate (sometimes obsessive community) in a day. But, for organizations built around a shared goal, managing expectations for all stakeholders is key.

The key element of a DAO is community and cause, not scalable governance mechanisms. Gaming communities work at scale, thats how DAOs will work, but we will have sub-DAOs everywhere like sub-committees, opines Freuden.

And, as Field notes, new crypto-native voting mechanisms such as holographic consensuses can handle, in principle, a higher and higher rate of proposals by turning this tension between scale and resiliency into an economical cost. Scalability is possible but not ensured.

The fragmented workplace also remains the key innovation of the DAO. So, for Freuden, voting is a subset of engagement. The purpose of DAO should allow permissionless engagement and permissionless contributions. DAOs mean people can work remotely.

In 20 years, DAOs may be the AI-powered self-organizing concept that has long been imagined. For now, that seems a long way off. But, we are witnessing the maturing of a new breed of productivity coordination organisms.

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Year 1602 revisited: Are DAOs the new corporate paradigm?

In 1602, the Dutch East India Company was formed in what many consider the worlds first initial public offering allowing perfect strangers to share in stock ownership. Four centuries later, the joint-stock model especially its incarnation as the modern business corporation sets the pace for much of the economic world.

But, decentralized autonomous organizations, or DAOs, could soon disrupt the joint-stock capitalized business model, much as the Dutch East India supplanted the limited partnerships of its day or so some may say.

DAOs are the new limited liability companies (LLCs), says DAO investor Cooper Turley of these leaderless internet-native entities where key decisions are typically made by consensus. In five years, companies wont have equity anymore. Theyll have tokens and theyll be represented as DAOs, while high-profile investor Mark Cuban adds, The future of corporations could be very different as DAOs take on legacy businesses. Others see DAOs challenging venture capital firms in the race to fund Web3 projects.

I think DAOs are already replacing traditional corporations, Sam Miorelli, an attorney who has been active in a number of DAOs including Curve Finance, tells Magazine. The promise of DAOs is the chance to return closer to the historical norm of project-first where smart people with good ideas can get funding and build a community around a project without first finding a legal budget. These decentralized autonomous organizations have some unique characteristics. According to law professor Aaron Wright:

DAOs are not run by boards or managers, but rather aim to be governed by democratic or highly participatory processes or algorithms.

Indeed, they have been described as operations that resemble an online chat room with a bank account, given that virtually anyone from anywhere with Internet access can join a DAO, participate in its governance and share its profits, Florence Guillaume, a professor at the University of Neuchatels Faculty of Law, tells Magazine.

The DAO of 2016

Things didnt look so promising back in 2016 when one of the first decentralized autonomous organizations unhelpfully named The DAO was formed on the Ethereum blockchain network. Several months after its formation, The DAO was hacked to the tune of $60 million which led to a bitter split in the still-nascent Ethereum community, culminating in a hard fork to restore the stolen funds. The DAO cast a pall over decentralized autonomous organizations for some time.

Today, these transparent communitarian organizations still face critical regulatory and legal challenges. Will they need to pay taxes? Can they open bank accounts or sign legal agreements? Can they bring lawsuits against other DAOs?

 

 

 

 

There is no Model DAO Act the way there is a Model Business Corporation Act, wrote attorneys Louis Lehot and Patrick D. Daugherty. They are fundamentally unprecedented in law. Key decisions, like deciding how funds will be spent, are often decided by a vote of members/owners who can number in the thousands. Needless to say, decision-making can be cumbersome.

A few things about DAOs: They are typically cooperatives hosted on blockchains like Ethereum (but not Bitcoin) that can handle chunks of software code called smart contracts that automatically execute when certain conditions are met. For example, if an airline flight is delayed by four hours (i.e., the condition), then a payment could be triggered via smart-contract code to the cell phones of passengers who had purchased flight insurance policies.

Most DAOs raise funds from the sale of tokens, which give investors/owners voting rights. Token owners make money if the DAO votes to pay dividends or through token price appreciation, similar to how investors earn profits in publicly listed joint-stock companies like Coca-Cola.

 

 

 

 

A better business model?

There is a future for DAOs, Erik Vermeulen, professor of business and financial law at Tilburg University, tells Magazine, given their transparency, security and open source governance protocols which mean that weaknesses are constantly probed and tested. Moreover, they discourage rent-seeking, i.e., manipulating public policy or the economy to increase profits. This is similar to when a company lobbies the government for subsidies. They aim to discourage natural and political monopolies because of their distributed nature, adds Vermeulen.

But, are they really superior to traditional organizational business models? Not all agree. The current token system does not necessarily prevent monopolies because there are individuals that may own a large amount of the DAO tokens and thus may control voting results, Sarah Hammer, managing director of The Wharton Schools Stevens Center for Innovation in Finance, tells Magazine, adding:

All DAOs are different. Some DAOs are structured to facilitate inclusion and others limit their membership vis-a-vis something called token gating. Token gating requires the DAO member to authenticate that they hold the DAOs NFT token in a crypto wallet before they enter the DAOs Discord server or website.

The defining attribute that makes DAOs different from past organizations is the use of the blockchain as the root of trust, Eric Lim, senior lecturer at the University of New South Wales, tells Magazine, such that the inputs and outputs from decisions that matter are immutable and auditable. This represents an advance over traditional centralized organizations, which Lim has called a zero-sum game.

DAOs have been attracting more attention in the mainstream press in the past year which has shed light on both their strengths and weaknesses. The ConstitutionDAO, for instance, formed on short notice in November, raised $47 million in a matter of days to bid on a rare first printing copy of the U.S. Constitution offered up for auction by Sothebys.

The DAO, described as a financial flash mob, gathered more than 17,000 donors a signal achievement, in the view of many, and one, if it had succeeded, that would have put the historic document in the hands of many (e.g., in a museum), as opposed to a single individual who might never display it again.

Once the bidding began, however, it became apparent that the DAOs transparent decentralized structure could be exploited. Everyone knew how much money had been raised by ConstitutionDAO and the amount that could/would be bid. The problem with the ConstitutionDAO is that the maximum possible bid is completely transparent, explained David Friedberg. The seller will just bid against the DAO to get their max bid. Ken Griffin, CEO of Citadel, walked home with the rare document.

 

 

 

 

The unwinding didnt go smoothly, either, as DAOs can be quickly formed for special events and disbanded afterward. ConstitutionDAOs core team struggled to come up with a plan to return investments as contributors bickered in online group chats, the New York Times reported. The average investment was about $200, but now the investors may have to pay that much in fees to get their crypto back.

Growing pains

That experience hasnt discouraged DAO proponents, however, who assert that, as with any innovation, growth challenges are to be expected. These entities are designed to flourish in the Web3 era. Moreover, DAOs decision-making processes can be streamlined by implementing digital-age variations like delegated voting, whereby owners (i.e., token holders) who are too busy to study the details or fine print of a proposal can assign their vote to a trusted third party.

As EY Global Blockchain Leader Paul Brody explains, shareholders in large corporations today can vote out management if it doesnt perform effectively. In practice, this rarely happens but delegated voting changes everything. Delegated voting rights are going to be a revolution and not just for DAOs, Brody tells Magazine, adding:

As people invest widely in both blockchain and traditional stock markets, it becomes impossible to keep track of all the key issues from executive pay to the carbon footprint. The ability to delegate your votes to industry or topic experts will allow owners to exercise a much stronger and clearer voice in the management of these companies.

Smart contract-based voting schemes make it possible to involve a larger number of individuals in decision-making, at least as compared to more cumbersome and expensive systems for collecting and verifying votes, according to Wright. The availability of smart contract voting protocols may make it possible for some enterprises to adopt their own individually tailored allocation of decision-making power between stakeholders.

DAOs can also change who is hired for a project and how they are paid. There is no question that DAOs are the future of work, Anne Connelly, Faculty with the Questrom School of Business at Boston University, tells Magazine. In an ever globalized society, the benefits of being able to hire internationally and pay across borders in crypto will provide an unprecedented competitive advantage. These autonomous organizations provide participants with more power than they could possibly wield in traditional corporations, Connelly says. Workers have more ownership in the outcome of the work, and those in developing countries will be less likely to fall prey to geographic class divides.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Others are more measured, however. We arent quite there yet, says Vermeulen, adding that DAOs still have technical and operational shortcomings and may be prone to Sybil attacks and 51% attacks, while Guillaume adds that DAOs will probably not replace traditional corporations but offer new alternatives to existing corporate and social organizations. They will be the organization of choice for specific cases, but this will be greatly influenced by legislation and how DAOs will be treated legally, further explaining:

Entrepreneurs and other people looking for a legal structure to undertake a new venture might be more inclined to choose to create a DAO if this type of organization has legal personality and offers limited liability to its members.

According to Miorelli, open-source legal work and open-source decentralized building blocks are two ways that DAO can bring on a lower-transaction-cost future for all. This also goes for funding ongoing projects. The core innovation of DeFi projects many of which are governed by DAOs is that the returns available when transaction costs decline to near-zero and when immutable contracts make enforcement of antiquated and classist rules like accredited investor regulations impossible.

Governance challenges remain

DAOs will need to overcome some key obstacles like sometimes diffuse governance structure that doesnt handle conflict or competition well. Coordinating and organizing activities in a decentralized community is definitely difficult, complex and unwieldy, says Lim. Meanwhile, Guillaume adds that DAO governance structures need to reach a point where it is easier and more adapted to manage resources using smart contracts than using traditional organizational structures.

However, DAOs cannot entirely eliminate the human factor and all the limitations implied therein. DAOs dont solve human organization issues but neither do corporations. No legal or organizational structure eliminates interpersonal conflicts, says Miorelli, adding that any well-organized endeavor can try to manage those conflicts.

 

 

 

 

There are other reasons to hesitate before pronouncing DAOs as the future of organizational business models. There is a danger of convergence, for instance, DAOs evolving to resemble something like traditional top-down managed corporations. That is a question in Brodys mind: When does a DAO cease to be a truly participatory ecosystem and start to look like just another flavor of shareholder- now stakeholder- owned company, complete with full-time management team and a very corporation-like hierarchy?

Will a DAO just be a corporation with tokens instead of shares? Or, will it come to mean something more that implies a very high level of user and owner overlap, engagement and participation? asks Brody. I see DAOs as one of several business structures that people would consider alongside partnerships, sole proprietorships and corporations, he continues, although he anticipates that most blockchain businesses will be managed by DAOs and many protocol-driven technology businesses as well.

More regulation coming?

Then, too, some DAOs seem almost too good to be true like OlympusDAO which was, at one point, paying 2,681.5% APY for those willing to stake its OHM coin. Some dismissed the DAO as little more than a Ponzi scheme and some believe that it can be the future of DeFi. But, the brouhaha around it suggests that more regulation may be coming for these internet-native entities. Would that ensure DAOs future?

The answer isnt clear. While some U.S. states such as Wyoming have handed down legislation around DAOs, Hammer notes, many others have not done so. In addition, some DAOs may implicate federal regulations and securities laws in particular.

 

 

 

 

I do not think DAOs will replace the traditional corporate form any time soon, Hammer tells Magazine. Traditional corporations like those formed under Delaware Corporate Law, for example, contain structures that while imperfect such as proxy voting have stood the test of time.

Moreover, supplanting traditional corporations as the dominant business organizational model would require a radical transformation of the federal financial regulatory framework, which is unlikely to happen in the near future, Hammer adds.

Collaborating across borders

Overall, there is much to get excited about regarding decentralized autonomous organizations. DAOs are the first structure that enables large group coordination digitally with full trust and transparency, Connelly tells Magazine. Using blockchains, large groups of geographically dispersed people many of whom can maintain anonymity can now collaborate while having trust that any decisions made are the true will of the community.

Its also about a dispassionate blockchain technology that treats everyone within the community equally and allows for an incentive structure that differs from that we are used to. It is about inclusive ownership and about doing what is right for the community, adds Lim. Still, DAOs arent likely to fully sidestep the governance quandaries that challenge traditional business organizations, Miorelli warns:

There are entire university departments devoted to optimizing organizations and I dont think that discipline will be any less in-demand from DAOs than they are from traditional corporations. Regardless of the legal structure or name, its always the people that matter.

DAOs also require a consensus mentality which may necessitate some getting used to. Lim has experimented with several DAOs, and he says it was a stark contrast to the way a university operates. In a DAO, I have to convince almost anyone to get a project funded, he says. And, people are incentivized to talk to me. There is a single understanding that if the projects that provide value to the community get funded, the community will grow.

So, do DAOs really represent an improvement over what exists already, then? I am an optimist and I believe in the inherent value proposition of a DAO, says Lim. The criticism that people throw at DAOs that they are unwieldy, messy and ungovernable is the same critique that people have thrown at the philosophy of democracy. Both are, in my opinion, perpetual works in progress.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Airdrops: Building communities or building problems?

Recent research shows that decentralized exchanges that distribute tokens via airdrops see a big boost in user numbers and transactions. But, is building communities this way just cryptos version of printing money?

Airdrops the disbursal of free tokens to early users as a way of rewarding and building momentum have been around for years but came to prominence thanks to Uniswaps retroactive largesse in 2020. Nearly anyone whod used the exchange before a certain date was gifted 400 UNI tokens and those who held their tokens saw a substantial increase.

But, as the market became more mature and more people entered the space, the use cases for airdrops have become more complex. For example, LooksRare more recently sought to siphon off some of OpenSeas user base by airdropping tokens to new users but with two key rules: They had to have bought or sold a minimum of 3 ETH of NFTs on OpenSea and would need to contribute a new NFT to the LooksRare marketplace.

There have also been notable bad airdrop examples, ranging from a lack of liquidity for Fees.wtf to phishing expeditions whereby recipients of the airdrop are baited into connecting their wallets to a malicious site.

The question for builders is: Are airdrops effective tools for galvanizing new users and building communities?

Building a community

Unless youre an already established exchange or NFT project, attracting new users is very difficult and handing out free tokens is one way to do it. In the DeFi and DAO space, tokens often come with governance rights that confer the authority to vote on the protocols development so airdrops can create both value and skin in the game.

But, how do you avoid devaluing the token and attracting a large group of freeloaders with no interest in contributing apart from receiving the airdrop?

Gary Vaynerchuk
Airdrops can be a very successful marketing strategy.

If you do it right, instead of just attracting attention, airdrops can be an effective vehicle for building community. They can reward loyal users and generate buzz and momentum in the market. Many exchanges are simply looking for relevance and traction in decentralized communities. Having something to talk about is a way to stay relevant and build value for the audience.

Thats what Gary Vaynerchuk, chair of VaynerX and creator of VeeFriends, did in 2021 when he announced that every customer who bought 12 print copies of his new leadership book about twelve essential emotional skills that are integral to his life would also receive one mystery NFT through an airdrop to their digital wallets. While the book was interesting on its own, the novelty of a mystery NFT coupled with the success and appreciation of his even earlier VeeFriends NFTscreated a significant splash and demand.

In fact, Vaynerchuk received over a million pre-orders of the book within a 24-hour period.

Airdrops and scams

Are there scams with airdrops? Scams are inevitable, especially with new technologies and markets where it is harder for new users to cut through the noise.

That means that the more important question is not whether all airdrops are scams, but rather how to work out which airdrops come from meaningful and high-impact projects. Especially for public-facing personalities, like Vaynerchuk, who make their business around legacy and reputation, even a whiff of a scam or simply failing to deliver value has costs.

 

 

 

 

When a startup fails in Web3, the audience loses money. I dont know how to run around the earth when the audience has lost money and think that I can do business again, Vaynerchuk tells Magazine. In other words, if customers who ordered 12 print copies never ended up receiving an NFT or were underwhelmed by the experience, then there would be consequences on Vaynerchuks reputation in the marketplace. Indeed, most, if not all, of the customers who bought 12 print copies were doing so to get the NFT, not for the 12 copies.

Reputational effects are sometimes easy to forget in new projects. Its so easy to get caught up in being busy and dealing with problems that certain commitments can slip by.

However, small projects can attract serious attention if they excite people about their growth, build a community along with a set of common principles and then execute on what theyve said.

Value accrues to the community as more people become interested, Justin 3LAU Blau tells Magazine. He is, of course, the famed American DJ and co-founder and CEO of the Royal platform with the tagline: Own music and earn royalties alongside artists. Since airdrops are one way to accelerate community development, particularly early on, they can be incredibly strategic when done right.

 

 

3lau
3lau is music royalty. See what we did there?

 

Dropping new music

3LAU has been especially effective in leveraging airdrops with music NFTs.

Shortly after co-founding Royal, which has flipped the business model in the music sector by allowing fans to journey with artists by having rights to future royalties, he announced a surprise airdrop of his latest track Worst Case to the 333 users who provided the most referrals. That, in turn, incentivized greater engagement and created value for the holders. The floor price of these NFTs stands at 2 ETH, coming to over $6,200 at current prices.

Although Royal is still in its infancy, there are many opportunities for artists to surprise their fans, inculcate enthusiasm and encourage participation through airdrops. 3LAU says:

Simply rewarding a community for engaging with your product in a retroactive way is not scammy. It is up to that community to decide what to do.

That ownership over the music creates a new level of connectivity between fans and the artist. Royals business model also provides a way for artists to acquire the capital they need to launch a career without selling themselves out to record labels and other intermediaries who end up making a killing and leaving the artist with very little.

Do these anecdotal experiences line up with the data? In short, yes.

 

 

 

 

We have the data

In my work as a computational social scientist and economist at Stanford University and Columbia Business School, one of my recent research papers quantitatively investigated the rise of decentralized finance by collecting data on the major crypto exchanges between 2014 and 2021. We documented a much more rapid growth among DEXs and found that decentralized exchanges that did an airdrop exhibit gained an additional 16.1% in their growth rate of market capitalization and 7.3% in their growth rate of transactions, relative to their centralized exchange peers.

Moreover, airdrops had a positive effect on market capitalization and volume growth even after controlling for other factors like when the exchange launched. While time will tell whether these patterns continue, the data supports the strategic use of airdrops.

Further, these results likely underestimate the value of airdrops given that they create more value than just the price associated with the corresponding digital asset. In fact, there could be broader social value if they also serve an educational and community-building purpose.

Airdropping tokens to new people in the space feels amazing, education through doing helps a lot, helping people get a first NFT and giving exposure to the project is just a nice feeling, said Vaynerchuk on Twitter. Assuming that the Web3 revolution is inevitable, then airdropping tokens provides an easy way for new users to test the waters.

 

 

Airdrops: Building communities or building problems?
Airdrops can be a great way to build communities.

 

 

Money printer goes brrr

And, yet, airdrops dont come for free even in the cryptocurrency market, says Vaynerchuk.

Supply and demand is supply and demand. You are still going to have to create more than short term financial gifts by printing more money.

Airdrops still have value if they are used sparingly, but the well can be tapped only so many times before they lose their surprise and appeal among prospective or existing users.

In that sense, airdrops might have a big impact once or twice at the launch of a project, but they can exhibit some diminishing marginal returns if artists are not thoughtful.

Airdrops in and of themselves are fine, but the mechanics of them might not be, 3LAU says. If a project is going to lead with another identical airdrop, it may be a dud. Rather, pointing toward something new and exciting may continue to drive engagement.

 

 

 

 

Know your product

Web3, especially DeFi, remains a wild west and the rules of the game have not fully formed. However, the United States Department of Treasurys Office of Foreign Asset Controls applies regulations on all U.S. companies. That means projects need to conduct Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering checks on individuals receiving airdrops, Ivan Ravlich, co-founder and CEO of Hypernet Labs, tells Magazine.

Verifying identities is not easy, but Hypernet Labs has created hypernet.id, a digitally-native and privacy-preserving nonfungible token that is minted to the end users crypto wallet. In this sense, users can now transact compliantly with blockchain-based decentralization projects, which was impossible in the past, says Ravlich.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

That service whether by Hypernet Labs or someone else is what the Web3 community desperately needs. For example, consider the recent confusion between CryptoPunks v1 and v2. Because of a glitch in the first version of CryptoPunks minted in 2017, Larva Labs issued a second version. However, some community members nonetheless created variants of the initial mint with different background colors, selling these NFTs as historical relics which led to a backlash by Larva Labs threatening to pursue legal action. In the presence of privacy-preserving validation mechanisms, these incidents could be entirely avoided.

 

 

CryptoPunks v1
CryptoPunks V1 were delisted from OpenSea.

 

 

While technology is never a panacea, it can be an important tool and airdrops are one such mechanism for creating momentum and cultivating community. However, caution is required: Even when a project owner does not have bad intent, airdrops can be executed poorly and not achieve the desired results.

Ultimately, potential token and NFT holders need to evaluate a project on its merits and believe it actually holds value. Simply accepting tokens from a project without a plan and clear value proposition is, at best, a short-term play and not a long-term wealth creation strategy.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Crypto innovators of color restricted by the rules aimed to protect them

Historically, Black and Brown communities have had restricted access to opportunities for generational-wealth building. Crypto offers a chance to redress that balance… but an opaque mess of laws and regulations around crypto services and a prohibition on certain wealth-generation opportunities are standing in the way of that happening.

Controversial language in the United States recently enacted infrastructure bill may have unintentionally contributed to that cycle. The document contains broad tax-reporting language directed at brokers. The ambiguity of the term means it could apply to those who have nothing to do with brokerage, like miners and developers, and could also have an inequitable effect on blockchain innovators of color.

According to Cleve Mesidor, founder of The National Policy Network of Women of Color in Blockchain, The assumption was that these miners were privileged white kids in their mansions. No, were mining and staking. Were developing wallets, hardware and software. This burden will not hurt Binance or Kraken. The only people you hurt are the little people. Karen Hsu, a cybersecurity expert and crypto entrepreneur, further believes that the language in the legislation could unintentionally block innovators of color out of the market.

Mesidor, also an author and former Barack Obama appointee, hopes to dispel the notion that blockchain innovators are predominately white men with limitless access to capital and power. She leads an annual congressional delegation to Washington of over 60 blockchain entrepreneurs and primarily meets with the Tri-Caucus (the Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic Caucus and Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus). Mesidor initiated the effort because she wanted these legislators to see people who looked like them.

 

 

 

 

Its not just founders of color who are potentially blocked out of the market. Federal regulations, or a lack thereof, restrict access to a litany of innovative retail investment products. With very few exceptions, leveraged tokens, crypto lending tools and all Bitcoin spot market ETFs are not permitted in the United States.

Proficient retail investors from all communities could benefit from these products, and they could be wealth-generating game changers for families and communities who have been locked out of the traditional system. Cryptocurrency legal and regulatory adviser Christine Trent Parker is uncertain what the right regulatory structure for those products would look like, but she believes that underserved communities deserve access to them and that those products should be offered in a regulated manner.

Why would you not let people [have access] who dont have access to investment products, who dont have a portfolio of securities that they can borrow against? Its a great product.

Manasi Vora, vice president of Skynet Labs and founder of Women in Blockchain and Komorebi DAO, believes that underrepresented retail investors are usually left out of amazing opportunities due to arcane laws, like the accredited investor law.

The Securities and Exchange Commission defines a retail investor as accredited if the individual has a gross income exceeding $200,000 or has joint income with a spouse or partner exceeding $300,000 during the past two years. Although the law was amended by Congress in 2020 to include investors with certain professional credentials, it may still be too restrictive when applied to the crypto space.

 

 

 

 

Komorebi DAO invests in crypto founders from underrepresented communities. Prospective members of the collective who dont meet accredited investor requirements cant participate. Vora says: With Komorebi DAO, if the law restricts us from having accredited investors as members, then that leaves them out from all the potential value of investing in crypto companies.

Back to businesses

When Hsu first entered the space in 2016, she felt that there was a lot of idealism about how cryptocurrency and blockchain could be used to serve the unbanked. She and other members of Blockchain by Women, an organization she founded, were optimistic. Many came into the space with grand visions. They hoped to build profitable companies, and Hsu wanted to help protect crypto entrepreneurs. She started the firm BlockchainIntel to provide affordable cybersecurity services to innovators in the space, including those creating products and services for underserved communities.

According to Hsu, large institutional investment firms like JPMorgan Chase entered the ecosystem a few years ago and began gobbling up the lions share of the wealth. Smaller firms like Hsus struggled to compete. She couldnt charge sustainable rates that were comparable to those paid by the big companies. Even more challenging, her customers struggled to effectively navigate complex regulatory systems concocted by state regimes and uncertain federal regulatory agencies.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Hsu soon determined that many of the guidelines currently on the books had been built around the needs of the larger, well-established cryptocurrency exchanges and deep-pocketed investment firms flooding the space. With some exceptions, these rules are exactly the same or similar to those antiquated statutes that have kept the underbanked and unbanked locked out of the system and discouraged financial innovation in communities of color. Some critics of the infrastructure bill argue that the current rules help sustain a non-level playing field where entrenched wealth and power is recirculated among those who already have it.

According to Parker, every state in the U.S. has a different set of rules for businesses identified as money transmitters, a subcategory of money service businesses that cryptocurrency exchanges are categorized as. Parker says, When youre dealing with spot market transactions, its a state-by-state analysis of money transmitter licenses. [..] Its not even one regime. Its 50 different interpretations of what it means to be a money generator. For example, Parker believes that setting up an appropriate LLC isnt that hard. An innovative entrepreneur can do that. Evaluating 50 money transmitter licenses… thats really hard.

Mesidor believes that these multistate regulatory requirements and roadblocks at the federal level are burdens that Black and Latinx innovators cannot comply with that will force them out of the space. Mesidor, also an adviser to the Blockchain Association, has actively been lobbying members of Congress to embrace common-sense regulatory legislation for cryptocurrency. She believes that federal regulatory clarity will help level the playing field for entrepreneurs from underserved communities and those providing crypto services to members of those communities.

 

 

 

Whats not being done?

If the nebulous federal regulatory effort is the primary obstacle to full inclusion, why arent the politicians who represent underserved communities doing anything about it? Why arent those legislators drafting bills, introducing legislation and lobbying for change?

 

 

 

 

Although Mesidor believes that her delegatory efforts on The Hill have made an impact, she still feels that some caucus members dont quite get it. Most are more focused on consumer protection than inclusion and education. An advocate for financial literacy, Mesidor believes that it would be more effective for legislators to find ways to teach their communities about the opportunities that digital assets offer:

If they were more focused on financial literacy and skills training and workforce training, that would be acceptable, but they are mostly focused on consumer protectionism.

During a hearing in December 2021 with cryptocurrency CEOs, several Democratic members of the House Financial Services Committee hammered the panel with questions about risks to retail cryptocurrency investors. Mesidor compares this hyperfocus on consumer protection to patriarchy and says: Some members of Congress are so hellbent on protecting us that they simply make sure we have no options.

And the solution is

Mesidor believes that voting is the ultimate solution to the problem. Shes working to recruit crypto-friendly candidates who also support unrelated political priorities in their communities. There is a new generation of political leaders who prioritize crypto, as well as equity and justice. My interest is in fielding new candidates of color whose agendas align with those issues. Mesidor adds further: Data shows that Black and Latinx communities are leading mainstream adoption, so crypto is already a growing priority issue for our communities.”

 

 

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez questions cryptocurrency CEOs at a hearing. Source: C-SPAN

 

 

Hsu believes that its just a matter of time a process of political and technical evolution. She doesnt think that unbanked and underserved communities are the primary focus of the crypto marketplace in the United States. The United States is a wealthy country, and most cryptocurrency stakeholders are focused on acquisition, the accumulation of wealth by those with access. Hsu believes that the process has to run its course and that, over time, the market will shift priorities.

Its just probably going to be after what we see now, which is focusing on the acquisition use case. Its an evolution here in the U.S. moreso technologies are adopted by the wealthier people first […] and then onto others.

In other parts of the world, cryptos use cases are less about acquisition and more about payments buying everyday goods and services. Once the U.S. market shifts to the needs of its average citizens, Hsu expects comparable laws and regulations to follow.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Building blocks: Gen Y can use tokens to get on the property ladder

The explosive combination of blockchain and physical assets is making a real difference in how young people can access traditionally illiquid, expensive and slow-moving physical assets such as property. Formerly a once or twice in a lifetime purchase for most people, this lucrative investment opportunity is now being democratized so everyone can share in the wealth.

This is important because many Millennials and members of Gen Z are effectively locked out of the property marketplace. According to The Intelligence Labs October 2021 report, global house prices are rising at the fastest rate since the first quarter of 2005. The pandemic fiscal stimulus-induced housing boom continues with prices rising by 9.2% on average across 55 countries and territories in 2020 to 2021 fiscal year.

Harry Horsfall, almost young enough to be a member of Gen Z and founder of Zebu Digital, is no stranger to crypto. In 2103, he bought his first Bitcoin and has not looked back since. His team has grown to 70 young crypto fans globally and he runs digital marketing programs for Web3 projects. However, he says that its only via crypto that he has any shot of ever buying an apartment.

With current UK prices comparative to salary and mortgage multipliers there is no way I could afford a down payment on an apartment and save for a deposit while living in London, let alone get a big enough mortgage for my own place, says Horsfal.

However, with an ability to use staking and yield farming through crypto, I am hopeful I can look at purchasing something modest hopefully in Lisbon.

But, banking on getting rich enough via crypto to buy a place is not going to be achievable for an entire generation. However, blockchain is also providing innovative new solutions for the majority by disrupting the property market through tokenization. Instead of saving up an enormous deposit to get a crippling mortgage, you can now buy a fraction of a property at a time via tokens and build up your stake slowly while benefiting from rising house prices.

 

 

Building blocks: Gen Y can use tokens to get on the property ladder
Can tokens help you get on the property ladder?

 

 

Building wealth, brick by brick

Cointelegraph caught up with Kevin Murcko, CEO of CoinMetro, who has been working in the space for a number of years. He launched tokenized property investments pre-COVID and has seen an initially incredulous community begin to gain both an understanding and appetite for digital assets.

Tokenization is just what Gen Z was waiting for even if they didnt know it. Currently, access to traditional property investment requires a high wealth threshold, much higher than for previous generations, he says.

With tokenization,people can now buy a fraction of a penthouse in Manhattan valued at say $30 million and still earn the same percentage return on their much smaller investment. And, when I say smaller it is technically and financially feasible to offer entry level units around the $500 mark.

He adds: Crypto is about access.

While its possible to offer such services without blockchain Australias BrickX is a good example tokens can make the process easier, more manageable and transparent.

Holding the token without using the property, as you might with a traditional timeshare option, means there are no tax implications until the time of the sale.

But, taking the leap into new and relatively untested property tokenization is a big call, and even crypto fans are wary.

Ashton Barger, Gen Z and head organizer of the U.K. conference DeFi Live, has been into crypto since 2017. Hes not sure he even wants to buy a house just yet due to the expense and while hes interested in the concept of tokenization, he thinks its a bit early.

Regarding the concept of tokenization, I havent invested in any of it, he says. Its just not a space Im as comfortable with investing in yet and Im just not sure where to start. I will likely find a way to get involved once I have the resources and means to do so.

 

 

Gen Y house
This is the sort of house the vast majority of Gen Y investors can’t afford.

 

 

Developing market

On the other side of the equation, tokenization offers developers a path to raising funds, especially for sub-$50 million developments.

Those developments are not attractive to traditional finance brokers, they dont make enough money in commissions and its ironically harder to raise money for more modest projects. So, not only investors like this approach but so do developers, especially new entrants to the market without a proven track record, Murcko explains.

You no longer need to find one investor that passionately believes in a project and is willing to hand over $50 million, you can find thousands of investors willing to pledge lesser amounts.

Distribution costs are normally very high in TradFi, but if the funds are raised on specialized platforms then the costs are considerably lowered, the processes are streamlined and much of the cumbersome paperwork is ditched.

As an added benefit, Murcko reckons that the rise of tokenization will also force TradFi to become more agile.

A step toward an entire property

Murcko also reckons that the mortgage marketplace will also evolve in this direction, providing access to loans for those currently denied them by big banks.

Can crypto get you closer to your property dreams?

So, soon, you have a crowdfunded mortgage platform directly competing with the monopoly banks. A candidate might not reach the bar set under traditional finance criteria, but retail funders have different criteria and can be swayed by emotion and other factors. And, that is not a bad thing helping a single mom raise a mortgage to buy a house otherwise outside her scope will probably result in the most conscientious of re-payers.

Its the same with entrepreneurs looking to raise capital. TradFi might reject them out of hand without a proven track record, but a crowd might look at the passion and vision of the entrepreneur and decide to invest, he says.

 

One such entrepreneur to combine his knowledge of property and blockchain is U.K. Bricktrade founder and CEO Gus Kang. Kang has more than 20 years of experience in high-end property in both London and Hong Kong. He established a company called Waterfronts, based in the Docklands in London to manage property from there all the way down to Chelsea, which also has an office in Hong Kong.

He was struck by the possibility of using blockchain to streamline property purchasing bottlenecks.

Even buying a single property is a laborious process and can take up to six months. These delays seemed so last century and reinventing property investment became my passion.

Kang is in the process of launching what he calls the U.K.s first construction financial platform accepting both fiat and crypto where the minimum investment is only $500 and the actual transaction can be done in a minute. It basically uses blockchain coordination as a way of crowdfunding a development, then a one-stop shop to sell the apartments in the development and rent them out.

We have put a lot of security into all levels of this process to assure investors that the risks are minimized at all times. We are a very experienced team and have been working on this since 2018. 80% of the platform is now built and we are just waiting to complete the remaining 20% under the advice and guidance of the FCA and U.K. regulations, says Kang.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Token of tokens

Learning from other blockchain platforms, BrickTrade will have its own token which will allow token holders to get early access to offers.

This will be important, as from our research, we see these deals get funded up to a tune of a million pounds in minutes. There is an appetite in the marketplace for secure asset-backed investments.

Kang intends to involve the community in all aspects of the deal. In addition to accessing all the formational data, there are plans to have live camera feeds on each building site with regular webinars and updates from the developers.

The token holders can ask questions directly from the developer team.

Once the project is funded, they switch from fundraising to sales again in fractional amounts and also giving the BrickTrade community first dibs.

So, the developer comes to us to get funding in phase one but in phase two were now helping him sell the units while reducing costs of funds and cost of sales on both sides. The fractional owners can then decide if they want to sell the units once complete or if they wish to rent them.

This is phase three which amalgamates all of Kangs property this time in property management.

 

 

Buying property
Buying a property is a big life decision, but there are now some innovative alternatives.

 

 

We can find the tenant, get all the certificates required and make sure the legal paperwork is in place along with insurance. We do this anyway for our other properties, he says.

In fact, the beauty of this system is that a property could live in the ecosystem forever a property that we helped build and maintain. It is, by now, a known quantity.

Using blockchain, smart contracts and tokens have been the key to the streamlining of the process. In addition, having a fully closed proven development system from funding to selling will enable BrickTrade to get bigger discounts from developers.

If we had tried this ten or even five years it would not have been possible. But, now the timing is perfect with the demand in the market for asset backed investments.

Other markets up and running

The proptech market is finally here can be witnessed by other projects around the globe. One such project, launched and live, is AqarChain based in the UAE. Created in 2018 to develop real-world use cases in emerging tech, AgarChain digitizes real estate on its own platform and claims to be the worlds first decentralized real estate market.

On its hybrid tokenization platform, real estate assets are first turned into an NFT holding the title deed in the metadata and then the NFT is fractionalized. Property ownership is authenticated through the NFT.

Agarchain CEO Waqas Nakhwa says the beta platform launched in January and the NFT Assets marketplace is due to come this month followed by the Metaverse land.

Aqarchain in Q1 will also be exploring listing properties on its tokenization platform outside of UAE. A full-scale Aqarchain platform is expected to be available in Q3 of 2022. The full-scale platform will have the Metaverse and P2E land exploration game as its extended features, he says.

Ownership of the NFT tokens will also confer governance voting rights, prorated returns on the property and any capital appreciation or depreciation of the value of each property. In addition, the owners of the project predict an active secondary market.

In addition, Propy, an NFT focused real-estate company, is applying innovative blockchain technology to real-world assets. By working with new protocols for real estate transactions they are providing an extra layer of trust and removing stress for home buyers. As part of their expansion, they have announced the first U.S. real estate NFT with an auction of a Florida-based home later this week. After a successful sale, the property becomes a DeFi asset that can be borrowed against.

 

 

 

 

DIY property tokenization

At the other end of the scale from the grand plans hatched in the skyscrapers of Dubai, there are more DIY efforts using tokens to represent property.

Aaron Cohen, 23 has been involved in the crypto market since 2016 and is a founder of @PhysicallyBacked. He had previously purchased a land plot about an hour out of New York and he decided to fractionalize the entire plot into multiple one-square-foot assets.

I am not hiding anything this is utterly transparent but I really wanted to add real value to NFTs, he says.

At the time of the interview in late January, Cohen had just listed four NFTs, each representing a one square foot plot for $200 and within an hour and two of them had sold. In fact, the bright purchaser of one of them had it directly relisted on OpenSea at a new price of 1 ETH.

 

 

OpenSea
Physically backed tokens for sale.

 

 

Good luck to them, says Cohen. Ownership of each NFT allows the holder ownership in the land now and also rights in the future in case of development. But, today, its sentimental NFT ownership. After all, who wouldnt want to own a plot of land just outside New York?

Current plans for how to develop the concept in the future include planting trees and creating a carbon sinkhole. Cohen points to the scarcity of his NFTs as they are directly linked to actual land and not a digital space.

Still, its a nice thought that you can get on the property ladder in New York for just $200 even if its only big enough for a bug hotel.

 

Disclaimer: Cointelegraph Magazine does not endorse property tokenization services or recommend investing in property via new platforms. Its super interesting of course, but new and fast-evolving investment tech is high risk.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Here’s how to keep your crypto safe

When the mafia kidnapped me, I had the choice to pay the ransom in either fiat money or Bitcoin. I did not hesitate before choosing the latter. Had I picked the first option, the criminals would have held me in a dark, damp cell for days in the Pacific Islands until the funds went through KYC, identity check, or, God forbid, the bank placed a hold on the funds. But after I paid, I was let go instantly. Who knew the network’s 10-minute transaction time and cross-border anonymity could be such a lifesaver?

Dr. Anon

According to a recent report compiled by Chainalysis, the intersection between cryptocurrency and crime has grown to become a $14 billion industry in 2021. Regrettably, societies worldwide are far from perfect, and the rapid rise in the market capitalization of digital currencies has led to an explosion of crime targeting blockchain enthusiasts. The good news is that the money lost in criminal activities as a percentage of crypto’s overall market cap is actually going down.

 

 

 

 

While there is a wide range of variance in tactics, the common theme is the exploitation of individuals’ naivety and blind trust in the legitimacy of the crypto services they sign up for. The first step toward compounding gains with crypto investments is to be super diligent and to avoid losing your vigilance.

We’ve spoken to three experts to get their advice on protecting one’s hard-earned capital. First up is Dr. Anon, a Cointelegraph staff member, who, long before joining the firm, was targeted by the mafia out in the Pacific Islands for his expertise in crypto (as you may have gathered, his first security tip is to remain anonymous online to avoid letting bad guys know you even have crypto). Dr Anon is frequently abroad for work and had to think quickly to get out of quite a few dangerous situations. He explains why it’s essential to keep a low profile.

 

 

Dr Anon
Dr. Anon goes by many names.

 

Dont post online about your success in crypto

Dr. Anon: In many parts of the world, people remain underexposed to crypto. Their only insight comes from sensational media stories of individuals getting rich off an early investment in Bitcoin or a lucky bet on Shiba Inu. When you travel to certain countries and mention that you work/invest in crypto, the locals’ first impression about you immediately switches to that of millionaire or billionaire. It will make you far more susceptible to crimes such as robberies or kidnappings. Unless it’s someone you trust, make up a cover story about what you are doing.

In addition, some investors are very emotional about the state of affairs of their favorite coins, or are downright zealous. Be careful about posting criticism, strong negative opinions, or factual information about certain coins on social media if you have a public profile. Some blockchain fanatics could retaliate by doxxing you posting your phone number, addresses, spouses name, etc., for a broad (possibly crazed) audience. If you have to say something deeply controversial on the internet, keep yourself anonymous.

 

 

 

 

How to protect yourself from a $5 wrench attack

Dr. Anon: Long story short, a $5 wrench attack is when someone finds out you have a lot of crypto and physically attacks or threatens you and coerces you into giving up your private keys. Very few of these attacks happen

$5 wrench
Cyber security is no match for a $5 wrench and someone determined to make you give up your passcode.

impromptu; that is, they are highly sophisticated, carried out by professional, organized criminals. It’s a your money, or your life situation.

Suppose you became a target of kidnapping for crypto ransom. In that case, chances are the perpetrators have already scanned your LinkedIn profile, Twitter accounts, Crunchbase, public addresses listed on voter records, etc., and planned days, if not weeks, in advance to account for all the variables during the act, such as escape. The only way to access one’s private wallet is through the keys, so expect some pretty rough action if one refuses to hand them over.

That said, one can significantly limit their losses by having a decoy crypto wallet. In other words, don’t put all eggs in one basket. One strategy is to put, say, a small percentage of one’s crypto net worth into a separate hard wallet. Then, if a robbery, kidnapping, etc., were to occur, simply hand it over and call the police afterward. It’s a smaller loss than otherwise, and no amount of money is worth the risk of getting tortured or killed for refusing to pay.

 

 

Security
Be on the lookout for signs of a rug pull.

 

 

Pulling the rug from under you

Personal security aside, the risks facing crypto investors regarding DeFi rug pulls, hacks, phishing scams, etc., are significant. In fact, Chainalysis estimates $2.8 billion worth of DeFi rug pulls took place in 2021. Cointelegraph reached out to Hank Schless, senior manager of security solutions at Lookout, for his insight on crypto cybersecurity.

How to spot a potential DeFi rug pull

Hank Schless: Rug pulls, which occur when a crypto developer [or outright scammer] abandons the project and runs away with any investor funds, are unfortunately fairly common. Often, you can spot a potential rug pull by looking at how that particular crypto is traded. For example, if a smaller number of wallets hold a massive percentage of the currency, or if its liquidity is abnormally low, odds are it could be a rug pull scheme.

 

 

 

 

Also, if the developer chooses to remain anonymous or the project seemingly appeared out of nowhere, this could be because the developer is malicious and trying to execute a rug pull as a quick money-grab scheme.

Common traits of exchange hacks and protocol security breaches

Hank Schless: Cryptocurrency platforms make for appetizing targets for a handful of reasons many of which align with other financial cyber crimes, such as targeting banks and their customers.

Crypto platforms themselves have a mountain of highly sensitive, personally identifiable information.

Hank Schless
Hank Schless.

To register for most crypto platforms, individuals need to give their legal name, home address, date of birth (and the last four digits of their Social Security number in the United States). In addition, they need to link their account to a bank account and a debit card to make cash purchases of new crypto.

Cyber criminals can target employees of the crypto platforms with phishing attacks that intend to steal their corporate login credentials. With these credentials, the attacker can log into that employee’s account and move laterally around the infrastructure until they find valuable data to exfiltrate, encrypt for a ransomware attack, or funnel customer funds out to their crypto wallet.

The No. 1 thing to keep your crypto safe

Hank Schless: The number one thing, which is not a novel tactic, is never sharing your login information with anyone. As a personal investor, you rely on trading platforms to keep your data safe, but to keep attackers from gaining access to your personal funds, you should never interact with a link or email that asks for your login. If you receive a text message or email that claims to be from the platform you use, contact the platform directly and validate the communication.

Keep your funds in cold storage but even that is not completely secure

Hank Schless: No piece of hardware or software is entirely invulnerable. There are inevitable flaws in code and manufacturing, which could lead to critical vulnerabilities, but with enough time and resources, anything can be hacked. In the case of cold wallets, the most significant risk occurs when a malicious actor gets physical access to a wallet and can take the time to try to guess its PIN. That being said, it’s still far more secure to store crypto on a cold wallet than anywhere else.

Social engineering and time pressures are ways to exploit the desire to get rich

Hank Schless: When targeting consumers, attackers know that crypto is relatively new and uncharted territory for most people. This may cause consumers to exercise less caution or have difficulty spotting red flags that indicate mal-intent. However, the recent boom has driven high interest in crypto and engagement with these platforms as people hope to make money from this alternative form of investing.

There’s also a particular type of individual who chooses to invest in cryptocurrencies, especially less established ones, to take on higher risk for potentially higher reward. This opens the door for aggressive social engineering and [the creation of] fake apps that either look real or promise higher returns and more real-time data.

Attackers will always try to create high-pressure situations that cause you to not think about what’s happening. It’s essential to take a step back, evaluate the situation, and find different ways to validate what’s happening.

If you’re ever contacted in this way, and the individual asks you to download an app or click a link, simply don’t. If this does happen, it’s important to ensure you’re protected by having a mobile security app on your device that will block connections to phishing sites and alert you if you download a malicious app.

 

 

Tax time
Nobody likes tax time.

 

A word on tax

And lastly, while pretty much no one in the crypto world is fond of taxes, almost all types of crypto acquisitions/dispositions are taxable events.

Despite the “Wild West” regulatory environment, crypto investors can face severe penalties should they be found to be non-compliant with their tax obligations so, keeping your tax affairs in order is essential to protect your hard earned funds.

In an interview with Cointelegraph, Andrew Henderson, an international tax attorney and founder of the Nomad Capitalist tax consulting firm, discussed the nature of crypto tax transactions and the consequences for not abiding by the law.

Is there any way to legally avoid the tax bill?

Andrew Henderson: You’re paying on pretty much everything acquisition/disposition related; it’s like

Andrew Henderson
Andrew Henderson

with fiat money if you live in the U.S. and get paid in euros, or even crypto, it doesn’t mean it’s not taxable. Other examples, such as staking or getting rewards from a DeFi pool that’s income and taxable as well.

If you’re a U.S. person, or a green card holder or a citizen, anywhere in the world, you have to report your crypto income to the IRS [Internal Revenue Service] each year.

Suppose you live in a residential tax country, like Germany, Canada, Australia, or pretty much every Western country other than the U.S. In that case, that is where they tax you based on your residence, and they tax you based on your worldwide income.

So, if you live in the country and stash all your crypto in an account in Belize, that doesn’t solve the problem; you will be taxed locally. The goal of having no legal tax obligations depends on whether you are a U.S. person and giving up citizenship, or whether you’re simply moving out of your country and following the criteria to no longer be a taxpayer there, for citizens of countries with residential taxation, such as Canada, EU members, Australia, Japan, South Korea, etc.

Affluent investors can move to low-tax countries. Is there a trade-off?

Andrew Henderson: I’m a person who believes in the culture of a country, and obviously, El Salvador is trying to move in the right direction, at least on that crypto front. But that said, I’ve been to El Salvador; I found it to be a highly unworkable country. San Salvador was one of the few places in the world where I felt very unsafe. So, I do think there’s a danger.

In a country like Estonia, when they announced their digital nomad visa, everyone thought that meant they would get citizenship, and everyone could get a bank account, and there was zero tax. No, no, they have tax; you pay it later. So, [Estonia’s residency visa] was not nearly as great as what it was touted for.

The Cayman Islands, the UAE [there are] plenty of territorial taxation only countries. Tax-free, tax-exempt now you can move to Portugal, you can move to Italy, you can move to Greece, you can move to Malta, you can move to Ireland. These countries all have tax exemptions for some time, at least. A lot of people have moved to Puerto Rico to reduce the taxes. But Puerto Rico responded [by] raising the tax rate from 0% to 12.5%. So, anyway, you don’t need to go to places if you are not comfortable there; alternatives exist.

 

 

 

The consequences of evading crypto taxes

Andrew Henderson: Some people who got stuck before they came to me flew too close to the sun. But, as a case study, there’s one thing they’re efficient at over in Spain they’re efficient at finding you, and will get your money. I mean, look at people like Wesley Snipes.

You’re filing a tax return under oath, so if you omit or misrepresent, you could go to jail. You could have your passport taken away citizenship or passport. Good luck getting a residence permit anywhere in the world if that happens. Maybe El Salvador would take you; some countries don’t require clean criminal records.

 

 

(function() {window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || {listeners: [],forms: {on: function(evt, cb) {window.mc4wp.listeners.push({event : evt,callback: cb});}}}})();

The best of blockchain, every Tuesday

Subscribe for thoughtful explorations and leisurely reads from Magazine.


By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 

 

Even if you don’t pay and you haven’t been caught, it could come and bite you down the line. For example, if you want to move to Saint Lucia [island nation in the Caribbean], one of the questions is: Are you in compliance with all your tax obligations? If you say yes, and later it turns out you’re not, they have every right to denaturalize you; you could become stateless. Or, at the very least, you paid $100,000, and you got nothing because you broke the contract. The consequences are far-reaching.

To sum up: Small tricks can have a big payoff

We all love to express our successes in the crypto space, but remember that too much attention could potentially expose oneself to the risk of a $5 wrench attack or doxxing. Therefore, if you have a crypto fortune, keep as much of your public information hidden as possible, have a decoy wallet in case one becomes a target of crime, and have a cover identity when in not-so-affluent countries.

Never share your login information with anyone, and keep your funds stored in a cold wallet. Specifically, be wary of clicking on links in apps like Discord that lead to login pages, as such programs have repeatedly become the target of phishing in the past. Always remember the official site link and cross-check that with the link you are clicking, even if the link is posted by an admin, as the latter’s account is still vulnerable to being compromised.

Remember to keep accurate records of your taxable transactions it makes life a lot easier when it comes to filing returns. Citizens of residential taxation countries have legal means of avoiding capital gains or income taxes on crypto acquisition/dispositions, such as moving abroad. It’s much better to pursue such methods and have one’s mind at ease rather than evade taxes and risk jail time.

Stay safe out there, frens.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

Boston nurse fired for nudes on OnlyFans launches crypto porn app

Former Boston ICU nurse Allie Rae made international news in August last year after she was fired for running an extremely naughty Only Fans account on the side. The story appeared everywhere from the NY Post, to CNN, The Daily Beast and she even made an appearance on Dr Phil.

The resulting publicity saw fans subscribing in droves and the 37-year old mother of three now makes more than $200,000 a month.

But the same sort of moralizing and censorship that ended her nursing career also threatens her newfound wealth from Only Fans. Just six days after her story was made public, Only Fans announced it would ban sexually explicit content, under pressure from its banking partners.

“When the news broke about the payment processing and OnlyFans I began looking at other platforms to switch to, and quickly realized they too could fall into the same trap down the road,” Rae says on the line from her new home in crypto friendly Florida.

“It was at that time that I figured out crypto was the answer.

Shes assembled a team of 20 developers and is putting the finishing touches on a new Only Fans meets Instagram style crypto-powered social platform called WetSpace. Its due to launch in beta in February, accepting payments in a range of stablecoins across different chains to mitigate issues with gas fees. NFT support will come in the projects second stage mid-year.

 

 

 

 

Porn has long been seen as one of the best chances crypto has for adoption: Users can remain anonymous and performers dont have to deal with payment processors charging them high fees or unilaterally cutting off services under opaque morality clauses.

Despite this, as Magazine discovered in the past, crypto payments have failed to take off. Pornhub tried and failed with Verge, then moved to using Pumapays service, which was crippled by high gas fees on Ethereum and is in the process of relaunching on Binance Smart Chain. Spankchain attempted a more modest platform targeting crypto users but has had limited success so far, though its still in the game and is developing SpankPay V2 based on user feedback. Cumrocket is developing an NFT marketplace but reports limited availability of its CUMMIES tokens on exchanges.

Rae believes a major problem is trying to launch projects with related adult tokens. “I had been watching the fall of other adult shit coins and how their model was destined to fail serving two masters creators and holders. That is when WetSpace came about.”

Rae points out that adult coins add an extra step to the process and most are very volatile which isn’t attractive to users or models.

So I thought, Well we don’t need a coin, like, why go through all the drama of this coin? Of course, you’d get a lot of money up front, and it would definitely help fund your project. But luckily, I didn’t need to be concerned about the financial side of it, because I had the money to put into it.”

How she got here

The mother of three teenage sons, Rae is an unlikely porn star turned crypto entrepreneur. She joined the Navy at 17 and married husband Steven the following year (he sometimes stars in her videos). She then worked for five years in marketing, management and real estate, before getting her dream job in nursing. “I was obsessed, she says. “I was a straight A nursing student, it was truly my passion and still is, it really is.”

Rae received a Masters in Nursing Education and specialized in Neonatal Intensive Care, nursing sick babies back to health. “Even though it was such a tragic time for so many families there were also so many great moments, she says. I was a wonderful NICU nurse very, very good at my job.”

But bored at home during the pandemic, she started up an Instagram account posting about hockey and craft beer. This attracted a devoted male following, some of whom suggested she start an Only Fans. When she read news reports that the actress Bella Thorne had made $1M on the platform in a single day, she decided to take their advice.

“I posted a few pictures and I really actually had kind of fun with it. It was quite liberating, you know, at my age and before you knew it, I had so many subscribers and we were actually making good money on there.”

By the end of her first month shed made $6,900 more than the $6,500 she was paid as a nurse.

Unfortunately for Rae not everyone is a fan of Only Fans and a group of six of what she calls her mean girl colleagues, led by a Pastors wife, stumbled across her Instagram and then screenshotted her Only Fans content for management.

News spread like wildfire through the hospital and that was ultimately what I think drove management to have to act.

Their overall consensus was that it was now such a distraction on the unit, with everybody knowing, that if I was going to continue to do that, I couldn’t work there,” she adds.

“I wasn’t mentally ready to leave, I’ll tell you it was very difficult. There’s a lot of tears shed in that. But I think given how toxic the environment and how judged I felt there, I wasn’t looked at the same, it was probably the right thing to do.”

Tailor made for the media

Firing an ICU nurse in the middle of a pandemic due to her porny Only Fans account is an editors wet dream (not Magazine of course, we’re strictly interested in the future of finance) and the story went viral. She went from making $35K a month from her side hustle to $200K a month thanks to the publicity. Steven gave up his airline job to help full time with the business.

“Our success was just unbelievable and so it became hard to not make it a priority, she says.

Its crazy to go from being a suburban hockey mom slash nurse to now I’m like this advocate for the sex industry. I mean, it’s very, very different.”

Porn payments

Part of that advocacy is trying to figure out a way for creators and operators to escape the stranglehold that traditional payment processors have on it. In recent years the war on adult sites by payment processors has ramped up, supported by the emotive campaigns of anti-porn crusaders.

A case in point in the famed New York Times piece in December 2020 called The Children of Pornhub. Columnist Nicholas Kristof sensationally claimed the site is infested with rape videos. It monetizes child rapes, revenge pornography, spy cam videos of women showering, racist and misogynist content, and footage of women being asphyxiated in plastic bags. He argued the site facilitated sex trafficking and cited a petition with 2.1 million signatures calling for it to be closed.

Often mistakenly referred to as an investigation, the NYT billed the piece as opinion meaning its usual standards of fact checking dont apply. Mashable summed up the piece as being based on the dubious and distorted findings and arguments of one anti-sex work conservative group. It caused a massive backlash and MasterCard and Visa quickly announced they would no longer provide services to Pornhub, threatening the viability of the tie.

The deplatforming of sex sites by payment companies has ramped up considerably in recent years, following the passing of the controversial FOSTA-SESTA (Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act and the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act) in 2018.

Raes first encounter with the issue, came when Only Fans caused outrage in August last year by announcing it would ban ‘sexually explicit’ content, threatening the livelihoods of 2 million creators making $2.3 billion a year. Founder and CEO of OnlyFans Tim Stokely blamed BNY Mellon, Metro Bank, and JPMorgan Chase for refusing to process payments, though the ban was quickly reversed after banking partners assurances that OnlyFans can support all genres of creators.

“A lot of people at that time were reaching out to me, what do you think about this? Oh, my gosh, where are you going? You’re making so much money. Now where are you going to put your content?” she recalls.

Rae explains that shed considered other platforms but realized competitors are at the mercy of the banks as well.

“That’s when my brain really got to turn on to: what is the solution to this?, she says.“At that time, I didn’t fully understand the nature of what was going on. But I did a lot of research and I started to really dive into the dark, you know, part of what’s going on in terms of the big financial institutions.”

“Porn is always looked at as taboo. There’s a stigma out there. But the amount of control that these banking industries have, over every platform that runs primarily on fiat, is scary.”

Counterpoint

She argues that Only Fans gives creators a safer way to work in the sex industry than in a strip club or on the streets. And while she believes in taking firm action against sex trafficking and child pornography, she says those aims are only selectively pursued by payment processors.

A 2020 survey from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children revealed Facebook had 20.3 million reported incidents of child sexual abuse materials, Google had 546,704 incidents, Twitter had 65,062, Snapchat 144,095, and TikTok 22,692.

Way down the bottom of the list was Pornhubs parent company MindGeek with 13,000.

“Facebook literally is the leader in child sex trafficking, and they’re definitely not shutting them down, she says. How much of it is in regards to them just truly wanting to get rid of the people in this industry (porn) and ban this type of content is it really about child trafficking?”

The banks are the issue across the board. And the only natural solution to that is well, how do we get rid of the banks? Well, luckily, there’s decentralization, and there’s crypto.”

Crypto and the porn industry

Rae had dabbled in crypto previously, making a bundle off of Dogecoin when Elon Musk’s tweets drove it to the moon, and playing around with creating her own NFTs when Cumrocket launched its NSFW NFT marketplace in mid-2021.

She says the anonymity of crypto is perfect for users who want to sign up but cant afford to have an Only Fans entry on their bank statements.

“I get DMs all the time saying God, I wish I could join Only Fans. But you know, I just can’t have my accountant seeing all the charges.'” There’s a huge market that a lot of creators aren’t able to tap into.

The WetSpace interface will look a lot like Instagram with a feed, a discovery feature for creators and later on, a marketplace enabling models to sell NFTs with added bonuses like free subscriptions, premium snaps or video chats. WetSpace will charge creators 15% (Only Fans charges 20%) and they can select which cryptocurrencies to accept. They receive the money instantly and don’t have to worry about chargebacks.

Rae says its about 90% complete right now, with new features being added all the time.

We have a Discord (forum) that’s really poppin, lots of creators saying, Hey, are we gonna have this? Can we do this? And I’m like, Yes, were gonna have so many great things. I think it’s going to be a fun place to be for the user and the creator. And I’m excited and I hope it revolutionizes this entire industry.”

Yeah, but

While theres no doubting her ambitions, so far though crypto payments in porn haven’t really worked out. In early 2020, Spankchain performer and ambassador Allie Eve Knox explained to Magazine why:

These are old dudes that are just trying to get off and then now they have to go through this whole thing of creating a wallet, saving a seed phrase, getting crypto, moving it into a wallet. [] Its not just Im gonna go buy porn in 15 minutes and relieve myself process.

Rae however believes times have changed and that the tech is more widespread and user friendly than ever before. She concedes the biggest hurdle will be helping noobs get started, but there will be step by step explainers and guides on how to buy crypto through a connected Coinbase, Metamask or Trust wallet.

“I want very, very clear clicks: like sign up for your wallet here step-by-step because I do understand it is a learning curve. We are putting a lot of time and money into the educational side of this. Because it truly is really easy once you get going.”

Crypto is in your face everywhere now. A couple of years ago, people would laugh at you if you talked about Bitcoin, people were like, Oh, God, one of those Bitcoin people! And look at it now. It’s an actual currency. I think a lot of people who didn’t believe in it before are definitely starting to be like, Okay, what is this all about? And they’re wanting to know more.

There’s no doubt in my mind, it will be a very, very big part of pornography, or any type of subscription base for adult content, she says. I dont think its going away.

 

 

 

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month

A new intro to Bitcoin: The 9-minute read that could change your life

By now, youve probably heard of Bitcoin. You may have heard that it has made some people rich. You may also have heard that its a new form of digital money and that its the future of commerce, or that its a criminal enterprise and that its bad for the planet.

The messaging is confused and confusing, which is partly because no one person controls it just like Bitcoin, which belongs to… well, all of us.

In this short essay, I want to help the Bitcoin-curious understand a few facts about the worlds top cryptocurrency. Its not technical, and its not hard to follow. Its not comprehensive, either, which is why this article is peppered with links so that you can find out more.

Im not advocating for Bitcoin as an investment, although I do think its worth owning a little. Im just trying to set the record straight on a few misconceptions and help newcomers to the Bitcoin community get up to speed quickly with a few key concepts. Hopefully, if youre reading this with an open mind, youll realize quickly that theres much more to Bitcoin than its price.

There are babies in the bathwater

Lets start by getting a few things out of the way: Cryptocurrency is a dangerous, often ugly place. There are countless scams, hacks and exploits. It appeals to degenerate gamblers, criminals and fools. Motivated reasoning and sunk-cost fallacy prop up bad ideas long after they should have collapsed. Con artists thrive in the open, and ordinary people often lose their money. The crypto space is 95% bullshit by volume, so its understandable that some people conclude it must be entirely bullshit.

But mostly bullshit is not the same thing as entirely bullshit. Dismissing crypto because it is full of scams is like dismissing Twitter because the average tweet is terrible. The problem is not that Twitter (or crypto) has nothing to offer; the problem is that it takes time and energy to learn how to dig through the bullshit and find the genuinely interesting ideas.

Rejecting cryptocurrency entirely is much easier and seems to offer a lot of moral clarity but it leaves behind a nagging question: If cryptocurrency is so obviously awful, why doesnt it just die?

 

Bitcoin vs Dot Com assets and other bubbles
Bitcoin vs. the dot-com and other asset bubbles. Source: James Todaro

 

Bitcoin is not going away

An interesting thing about Bitcoin is that almost no one believes in it right away. Bitcoins design is so ugly and counterintuitive that almost everyone rejects it as impossible at first. There were around three years between when I first heard about Bitcoin and when I finally started to seriously investigate it. I studied game theory and mechanism design in grad school, so I knew exactly why Bitcoin couldnt work. I just couldnt figure out why it was still around.

In theory, I was confident that Bitcoin could not exist… but in practice, it did. And when theory conflicts with observed reality, it is theory that must change. I became skeptical of my skepticism. I read the white paper. I changed my mind.

More than anything I can write or say, the most compelling evidence that Bitcoin works as advertised is the history of its operation so far. The longer Bitcoin continues to exist, the more seriously you should take it.

The academic term for this is the Lindy effect the idea that the longer something has survived, the longer you should expect it to continue. We could all collectively decide tomorrow that gold is no longer valuable, and we could decide to keep listening to todays hit singles forever. But we probably wont.

Gold has been valuable for a long time, so it will probably still be valuable a long time from now. Todays top songs are mostly new, which suggests that tomorrows top songs will probably mostly be new as well. The continued existence of something is evidence it will continue existing. Thats the Lindy effect.

Thats why governments around the world have stopped ignoring Bitcoin and started to develop formal policies to outlaw, regulate or adopt it. A policy of ignoring Bitcoin and assuming it will go away on its own is no longer realistic. If Bitcoin was going to go away on its own, it already would have.

 

Ponzi will not reveal secret

Bitcoin has value because it is useful

A common objection to Bitcoin is that since it isnt backed by anything, it must not be worth anything. Since it doesnt have any intrinsic utility, it must be a greater fools game, where the only goal is to sell your worthless bags at a higher price to an even greater fool than you. It is true that the only use for Bitcoin is to transfer your Bitcoin to someone else but that doesnt mean Bitcoin is useless. Transferring value is a valuable service. Thats why banking is so lucrative.

As a thought experiment, imagine there was a base metal as scarce as gold but with the following properties: – boring grey in colour – not a good conductor of electricity – not particularly strong, but not ductile or easily malleable either – not useful for any practical or ornamental purpose and one special, magical property: – can be transported over a communications channel. If it somehow acquired any value at all for whatever reason, then anyone wanting to transfer wealth over a long distance could buy some, transmit it, and have the recipient sell it. Satoshi Nakamoto

Money is a technology for transporting value through space and time. Bitcoin is a vehicle for value that eliminates physical distance and cannot be diluted, seized or censored. It is the value of that service that backs the value of Bitcoin.

 

Bitcoin will not be stopped

Bitcoin does not have a central point of control, so the only way to stop Bitcoin is to stop every person on the Bitcoin network individually. Even shutting down the entire internet wouldnt work because you can connect with the Bitcoin network over radio or by satellite. By any realistic measure, the network itself cannot be stopped.

Governments can, of course, outlaw cryptocurrency (several have), but making Bitcoin transactions illegal is like making drug use illegal it doesnt eliminate it so much as drive it underground. China is a powerful authoritarian state that has repeatedly banned Bitcoin, but you cant actually ban Bitcoin from China because Bitcoin has no concept of China. China can only choose to isolate itself from the network.

But what if governments go further and actually attack the network? They could secretly acquire or seize mining rigs and set them to mining empty blocks, slowing down the network and reducing revenue for honest miners. They could market-sell the rewards they earn mining and open short positions to drive down the price of Bitcoin, further damaging miner revenue and market confidence. As miners quit defending the network, attackers would control more of it, causing a feedback loop and death spiral.

Attacks like this are easiest to picture with an abstract, monolithic world government. It is less clear how they would work in the context of actual world governments today. The two most obvious governments in practice that might launch such an attack are the United States and China. China has been systematically working to expel all the mining rigs from its borders, so it isnt exactly gearing up to launch a mining-based attack on the network.

 

 

America also seems like an unlikely candidate to launch an attack on the network. Seizing private property like mining rigs outside the context of a conventional war would be an unusual, politically explosive precedent. More pragmatically, cryptocurrency has matured into an effective lobbying group. Sitting congressional representatives in both parties own Bitcoin and have made support for cryptocurrency part of their platform. Some have even made it their signature issue.

 

 

A sufficiently powerful, ideologically motivated attack could suppress the Bitcoin network, but it would be expensive to maintain and wouldnt prevent the network from resuming normal operation after the attack stopped. The game theory of what happens when motivated attackers and defenders clash over a blockchain is complicated, and reasonable people can disagree about what it might mean. But the two most powerful governments in the world today are either embracing Bitcoin or systematically disarming themselves.

 

 

Bitcoin will not be replaced

Bitcoin is (by design) a very limited system. You can pretty much only use it to send and receive Bitcoin. It is very difficult to change (also by design), so it adopts new technology very slowly, if at all. That can seem primitive and sluggish to outsiders, but being resistant to change is the central value proposition of Bitcoin. You cant make a better Bitcoin by making a Bitcoin that is easier to change.

Bitcoin is better understood as a social revolution than a technological one. No new cryptocurrency can achieve the same results as Bitcoin because the social context in which it was created is gone now. For the first year and a half of its existence, Bitcoin was essentially free there was a website called Bitcoin Faucet that gave users 5 BTC just for solving a CAPTCHA. Satoshi disappeared before the project hit major prominence and never collected any kind of special founders rewards for their efforts. Even if a new project could somehow recreate these conditions, it still couldnt recreate the history of proven operation since.

Other cryptocurrency projects may still prove useful and valuable but not by outcompeting Bitcoin to be the best money. If they are successful, it will be because they are optimized to serve a different use case.

They wont replace Bitcoin, they will exist alongside it.

In short, Bitcoin works as advertised.

Bitcoin has operated continuously outside of anyones control for more than 12 years now that fact alone should merit serious attention even from skeptics. It has not been hacked, censored, halted or controlled. It has survived bubbles and crashes and attempts to commandeer it, outlaw it or make it obsolete. That history of operation is a growing body of circumstantial evidence that Bitcoin really is what it claims to be: a perfectly scarce, sovereign asset.

The growing body of evidence that Bitcoin is real means that responsible people need to start planning for that possibility. What does the existence of a universally available, perfectly scarce asset mean for the world?

 

 

Countries with double digit inflation
Source: Blockdata

Bitcoin is good for people

Bitcoin is often accused of being principally useful for criminals, but that isnt really true. Criminal activity on the Bitcoin network peaked at around 2% in 2019 and fell to 0.34% in 2020. Bitcoin transactions create permanent public records. Most criminals would rather do business in U.S. dollars. Bitcoin is actually mostly used for saving.

Bitcoin is good for the poor because inflation weighs most heavily on the poor. If your net worth is mostly cash and future cash-denominated wages, inflation is a drain on your wealth. If your net worth is mostly investments and property, inflation just changes the numbers next to your accounts it doesnt cost you anything. In countries with runaway inflation, Bitcoin is a safe haven for the poor.

Bitcoin is also valuable for activists such as feminist protestors in Nigeria, dissident politicians like Alexei Navalny in Russia or disenfranchised groups like unbanked women in Afghanistan. Alex Gladstein of the Human Rights Foundation has called it an essential tool for preserving freedom.

 

 

Bitcoin is good for the planet

In spite of the reputation it sometimes has in mainstream media, Bitcoin is actually good for the environment. Bitcoin uses a lot of energy, but it is a scavenger that feeds on low-cost waste energy. Energy is much, much easier to produce than it is to store or transport, which means a lot of energy is wasted.

For example, oil mining often produces natural gas as a side effect. When it is convenient, oil companies will sell that natural gas; but often, oil is mined in remote locations, so it is not easy or cheap to bring that gas to market. Instead, in practice, oil companies simply vent that gas into the air and light it on fire, a practice called flaring. According to the estimates of the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, enough gas is flared globally to power the Bitcoin network nearly six times over. Here is how large flaring is relative to other sources of carbon dioxide emissions:

 

Flaring emissions - Bitcoin energy usage is good for the planet
Image: Global Carbon Project

 

Several companies are building portable Bitcoin mining rigs that can go to the vents and use that natural gas on-site to mine Bitcoin. That causes Bitcoins energy use to go up, but it actually has a positive impact on the environment because using natural gas is much better than flaring it. Both flaring and using natural gas produce carbon dioxide, but flaring which is often inefficient and incomplete can also release methane and NOx into the atmosphere as well. Methane damages the ozone layer, and NOx contributes to acid rain. Using the graph of Bitcoins energy use as a proxy for its environmental impact is misleading.

Bitcoin mining is also really useful for renewable energy because lots of renewable energy is produced at off-peak hours when it is less valuable. The Bitcoin network acts as a buyer of last resort for energy producers, which makes renewable power more economically viable. Bitcoin effectively subsidizes the creation of more renewable energy by creating a market for its excess power. Thats why renewable energy companies are starting to add Bitcoin mining to their operations.

A lot of anti-Bitcoin critics cite environmentalism as a concern, but not as many environmentalists cite Bitcoin as a concern because if you sincerely care about the environment, it is fairly obvious that Bitcoin is a footnote.

 

Bitcoin energy usage vs other countries
Source: CBECI

 

Energy use can be surprising. Bitcoin uses more energy than Argentina but less energy than American Christmas lights. Neither comparison is especially useful. A better comparison would be to the energy use of the entire legacy financial system or the environmental cost of the petrodollar. In proper context, Bitcoins energy use isnt so much large as it is easy to measure.

 

 

Bitcoin is an alternative to war

The history of warfare is a history of the defense and acquisition of wealth. If that wealth has a physical location, it will require defending physical territory, which implicitly means violence. As wealth migrates to non-physical systems like Bitcoin, it can be defended by non-violent means i.e., Bitcoin mining. The more wealth leaves physical goods, the less wealth requires physical defense.

 

 

Bitcoin also makes it harder for governments to prolong a losing war by spending their citizens wealth by hyperinflating the currency. It is much easier to fund a war with the creation of new money than through direct taxation because people understand the impact of direct taxation more clearly. Thats why most of the countries involved in World War I had to abandon the gold standard. If the people understood how much money war cost them, they would put a stop to it sooner.

None of which is meant to imply that Bitcoin is the end of war power plants and population centers will always need to be defended.

Governments will always find reasons to quarrel with their neighbors. But to the extent that Bitcoin gains traction, it does meaningfully reduce the means and incentives for violent conflict.

Bitcoin vs Cash

You should own some Bitcoin either way

It is entirely possible that even having considered all the arguments above, you remain unconvinced about the value of Bitcoin but you should probably still own a little Bitcoin either way. Thats because if Bitcoin succeeds in becoming the best possible way to store value, it will capture most of the value currently stored in other ways. Its not just that the price of Bitcoin will go up its also that the value of everything else will go down.

Thats why whether you like Bitcoin or not, everyone needs to think about how they will protect themselves from the possibility that Bitcoin is real. Owning a small amount of Bitcoin is one way to safeguard against that risk and you probably need less than you think. If everyone in the world wants Bitcoin, there wont be very much to go around owning 0.074 BTC (around $3,400 at the time of writing) will likely be enough to put someone in the top 1% of Bitcoin wealth.

 

You should probably own some Bitcoin

 

This estimate is based on current global wealth inequality. I also made a spreadsheet where you can examine and tweak assumptions for yourself.

Given that it takes such a small amount of Bitcoin to hedge against a Bitcoin future, owning no Bitcoin at all is actually an extremely confident stance. Being doubtful about Bitcoins chance of success is very reasonable, but being 100% certain that it will fail is overconfident. Intelligent skeptics are skeptical of their skepticism.

Keep your mind open

Regardless of how you feel about Bitcoin, I encourage you to stay curious. Ive been immersed in the space since 2014, and I am still learning new things and changing my mind every day.

If you want to read more, Ive curated a reading list of pivotal essays that I think are worth your time. A version of this story first appeared in the Something Interesting newsletter I write two to three times per week about cryptocurrency news and topics, and I try to answer all reader questions.

 

Analytics Firm Issues Cardano Warning, Sees ADA Flashing Bearish Signals After 200% Rise This Month