1. Home
  2. futures

futures

Ethereum on-chain data hints at further downside for ETH price

An assortment of on-chain and derivatives data signal that ETH price is unlikely to rally above $3,500 any time soon.

Analyzing Ether's (ETH) current price chart paints a bearish picture which is largely justified by the 11% drop over the past month, but other traditional finance assets faced more extreme price corrections in the same period. The Invesco China Technology ETF ($CQQ) is down 31% and the Russell 2000 declined by 8%.

Ether price at FTX, in USD. Source: TradingView

Currently, traders fear that losing the descending channel support at $2,850 could lead to a stronger price downturn, but this largely depends on how derivatives traders are positioned along with the Ethereum network's on-chain metrics.

According to Defi Llama, the Ethereum network's total value locked (TVL) flattened in the last 30 days at 27 million Ether. TVL measures the number of coins deposited on smart contracts, including decentralized finance (DeFi), NFT marketplaces, gaming and high-risk applications.

The Ethereum network's average transaction fee increased to $13 after bottoming at $11.50 on April 20 but one should analyze whether this reflects decreased use of decentralized applications (DApps) or merely if it is users benefiting from layer-2 scaling solutions.

Ether's futures premium tilts toward bears

Traders use Ether futures market data to understand how professional traders are positioned, but unlike the standard perpetual futures, the quarterly contracts are whales and market makers' preferred instruments because they can avoid the fluctuating funding rate.

The basis indicator measures the difference between longer-term futures contracts and the current spot market levels. In neutral markets, the Ether futures annualized premium should run between 5% to 12% to compensate traders for "locking in" the money until the contract expiry.

Ether 3-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The current 2% Ether futures basis clearly shows the lack of demand for leverage buyers. Although not precisely a backwardation (negative premium), an annualized futures premium below 5% is usually deemed bearish.

This data tells us that pro traders have been neutral-to-bearish in the past couple months, but to exclude externalities that might have influenced derivatives data, one should analyze the Ethereum network on-chain data. For example, monitoring the network use tells us whether actual use cases support the demand for Ether.

On-chain metrics are sluggish

Measuring the number of active addresses on the network provides a quick and reliable indicator of effective use. Of course, this metric could be misguided by the increasing adoption of layer-2 solutions, but it works as a starting point.

7-day average of active addresses on Ethereum. Source: CoinMetrics

The current 584,477 daily active addresses average is a 4% decrease from 30 days ago and nowhere near the 675,117 seen in November 2021. Thus, data shows that Ether token transactions are not showing signs of growth, at least on the primary layer.

Traders should rely on DApp usage indicators, but avoid exclusive focus on the TVL because that metric is heavily concentrated on DeFi applications. Gauging the number of active addresses provides a broader view.

Ethereum network 30-day DApps activity. Source: DappRadar

Ethereum DApps active addresses have flatlined over the past 30 days. Overall, the data is slightly disappointing, considering competing chains such as Solana saw a 34% active addresses increase.

Unless there’s decent growth in Ether transactions and DApp usage, the $2,850 descending support channel resistance might not hold, triggering a deeper short-term price correction.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Bitcoin bears tighten their grip on BTC now that $40K is the new resistance level

Mounting concerns about the state of the global economy and traders' risk-off sentiment continue to weigh on Bitcoin price.

Bitcoin (BTC) remains below $40,000 for the third consecutive day and the most likely source of the volatility is the worsening condition of traditional markets. For instance, the S&P 500 is down 5% since April 20 WTI crude price dropped 9.5% in seven days, erasing all of the gains accrued since March 1.

Meanwhile, China has been struggling to contain its worst outbreak of Covid-19 despite strict lockdowns in Shanghai and according to Timothy Moe, chief Asia-Pacific equity strategist at Goldman Sachs, "it's no surprise, and it makes all sorts of logical sense that the market should be concerned about the Covid situation because that clearly is impacting economic activity."

Investors were driven away from risky assets

As the global macroeconomic scenario deteriorated, investors took profits on riskier assets, causing the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) to reach its highest level in 25 months at 101.8.

The cryptocurrency mining business also faced regulatory uncertainties after the United States House of Representatives member Jared Huffman and 22 other lawmakers requested the Environmental Protection Agency to assess whether crypto mining firms were potentially violating environmental statutes on April 21.

Despite Bitcoin's 4-day price 10% correction to $38,200 on April 25, most holders choose to stay hands-off, as confirmed by on-chain data from Glassnode. The proportion of the supply dormant for at least 12-months is now at all-time highs at 64%. Thus, it is worth exploring whether the recent price rejection impacted the mood of derivatives traders.

Derivatives markets show bearish Bitcoin traders

To understand whether the market has flipped bearish, traders must look at the Bitcoin futures' premium (basis). Unlike a perpetual contract, these fixed-calendar futures do not have a funding rate, so their price will differ vastly from regular spot exchanges.

A trader can gauge the market’s bullishness level by measuring the expense gap between futures and the regular spot market.

Bitcoin 3-month futures basis rate. Source: Laevitas.ch

Futures should trade at a 5% to 12% annualized premium in healthy markets. Yet, as displayed above, Bitcoin's basis moved below such a threshold on April 6 and is currently at 2%. This means futures markets have been pricing in bearish momentum for the past couple of weeks.

To exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument, traders should also analyze the options markets. For example, the 25% delta skew compares similar call (buy) and put (sell) options.

This metric will turn positive when fear prevails because the protective put options premium is higher than similar risk call options. Meanwhile, the opposite holds when greed emerges, causing the 25% delta skew indicator to shift to the negative area.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew. Source: Laevitas.ch

If option investors feared a price crash, the skew indicator would move above 8%. On the other hand, generalized excitement reflects a negative 8% skew. The metric shifted bearish on April 7 and has since kept above the threshold level.

Related: Bitcoin sets up lowest weekly close since early March as 4th red candle looms

Traders will resist eventual price pumps

According to derivatives indicators, it is safe to say that Bitcoin pro traders became more uncomfortable as Bitcoin tested the $39,000 support.

Of course, none of the data can predict whether Bitcoin will continue to downtrend, but considering the current data, traders are overcharging for downside protection. Consequently, any surprise price recovery will be questioned.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Crypto Giant Grayscale Submits Letter to SEC in Bid for Approval of First Spot Bitcoin ETF: Report

Crypto Giant Grayscale Submits Letter to SEC in Bid for Approval of First Spot Bitcoin ETF: Report

Crypto asset manager Grayscale has reportedly submitted a letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in an attempt to get the nod for the first spot-based Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF). According to a new report by the Financial Times (FT), Grayscale recently sent a letter to the regulatory agency asking if they […]

The post Crypto Giant Grayscale Submits Letter to SEC in Bid for Approval of First Spot Bitcoin ETF: Report appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Bitcoin spot vs. futures ETFs: Key differences explained

Crypto enthusiasts and the government have long contended over the Bitcoin ETF. Let’s examine Bitcoin spot vs futures ETFs.

How many Bitcoin ETFs are there?

There are various companies offering Bitcoin ETFs, and each is available on their own respective exchanges.

While the only Bitcoin ETFs in existence are Bitcoin futures ETFs, there are quite a few out there in which one can choose to invest. This article previously mentioned the ProShares BITO Bitcoin futures ETF, which currently holds around $1 billion in investments. BITO is listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). 

Another Bitcoin ETF is the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF. Also offering Bitcoin futures ETFs, Valkyrie is listed on Nasdaq with the BTF ticker. Then, we have the VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF. Providing users with exposure to Bitcoin futures ETFs, the VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF is listed on the CBOE exchange with the XBTF ticker.

There are various other Bitcoin futures ETFs on the market, but those mentioned previously are some of the most popular. Which ETF is best is up to the user, of course, as they’re available on different exchanges, which can vary in rates.

Are spot Bitcoin ETFs better than futures?

Bitcoin spot ETFs and Bitcoin futures ETFs both have their pros and cons.

While spot Bitcoin ETFs are certainly more “legitimate” than Bitcoin futures ETFs as they involve actually buying Bitcoin, it’s hard to say which is better.

After all, a Bitcoin futures ETF might not involve buying in at Bitcoin’s spot price, but it streamlines the buying process and allows investors to bet on the market whether they choose to short it or otherwise. In that same vein, some Bitcoin futures ETFs struggle to accurately track Bitcoin’s price and many charge annual fees for holding contracts with the company.

Conversely, a Bitcoin spot ETF, according to many Bitcoin enthusiasts, will bring “legitimacy” to the asset as it’s allowing users to invest in Bitcoin without actually holding it — and doing so at Bitcoin’s actual price point.

The fight for a Bitcoin spot ETF

The Bitcoin spot ETF does not yet exist, with crypto companies proposing various concepts to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the years. However, a few companies have legitimized the Bitcoin futures ETF. 

Crypto companies have fought to legitimize a Bitcoin spot ETF in the United States for years, but the SEC has yet to give in despite its recent two allegedly “crypto-positive” chairmen. 

For instance, Jay Clayton, who was head of the SEC from May 4, 2017, to December 23, 2020, is a fan of Bitcoin as a store of value. However, no proposal convinced Clayton that a Bitcoin ETF of any kind was ready. Clayton’s successor, Gary Gensler, approved ProShares’ BITO.

Other ETF proposals, including those from Valkyrie and Van Eck, have also seen approval. That said, one company, Grayscale, might be the first to implement a Bitcoin spot ETF.

Grayscale, which holds the world’s only SEC-approved, publicly-traded Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), proposed its Bitcoin spot ETF to the SEC in 2016. The group shortly withdrew its application in 2017 due to a stalemate in the conversation.

As of March 2022, Grayscale remains committed to converting GBTC to the world’s first Bitcoin spot ETF, even threatening to sue the SEC if its latest attempts don’t go through. In opposition, the SEC claims that market manipulation is its largest holdup to a Bitcoin spot ETF approval.

How does a Bitcoin ETF work?

A spot Bitcoin ETF provides the same streamlined investment capabilities as a Bitcoin futures ETF, but it only allows users to invest at Bitcoin’s spot price rather than a future value.

A spot Bitcoin ETF brings all the benefits of a futures ETF, such as investing in Bitcoin without using an exchange, paying less in fees than on a crypto exchange, and streamlining the process overall. But a spot ETF invests in Bitcoin on the spot.

That’s right, a spot ETF invests in Bitcoin at its spot price, meaning buyers will be holding Bitcoin within their contracts. Enthusiasts view a spot ETF as a more legitimate method of investment because a spot ETF involves holding Bitcoin. 

However, as of now, there’s no such thing as an actual Bitcoin spot ETF due to the industry’s nascent nature. Crypto industry pundits often fight for a firm to establish a Bitcoin spot ETF as they believe that markets will take Bitcoin seriously after a spot ETF has been established.

What is a Bitcoin futures ETF?

A Bitcoin futures ETF provides users the ability to bet on Bitcoin’s price, having them agree to buy or sell Bitcoin at a specific price on a set date. 

A Bitcoin futures ETF is an agreement in which one will buy or sell Bitcoin at a specified price on a pre-determined date. For example, when buying via the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF, an investor could create a contract with ProShares to buy $10,000 in Bitcoin on June 15, regardless of Bitcoin’s actual value on that date.

Why would one choose to buy Bitcoin on a future date despite the asset’s volatility? It’s because they have reason to believe that Bitcoin’s price will be lower by then, and the entire process is carried out by the platform rather than the user. Plus, traders can also short the asset and create a sell contract.

Sure, one could simply just buy any amount of Bitcoin at any time without ProShares but a futures ETF ensures that users can invest in digital assets without inconveniencing themselves via exchanges. This method also costs less in fees when compared to most crypto exchanges. However, a futures ETF doesn’t involve investing in Bitcoin at its spot price, which is why some enthusiasts might not consider the offering a “real” crypto adoption.

Also, companies that offer a Bitcoin futures ETF may charge annual fees to keep contracts and accounts open. That, and these ETFs can occasionally fail to track Bitcoin’s price accurately. These issues leave many wanting an alternative ETF option in which to invest.

What is a Bitcoin ETF?

A Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) allows buyers to invest in Bitcoin without buying the actual asset. This investment method streamlines the buying process, enabling users to circumvent signing up for an exchange or dealing with crypto wallets. 

In traditional investing, an ETF is a form of investment that tracks the price of either an asset or a group of assets. ETFs represent an easy way to invest in multiple assets concurrently without actually holding said assets. 

In Bitcoin’s case, a Bitcoin ETF is an asset that simply tracks the price of Bitcoin. By investing in a Bitcoin ETF, users can still profit from Bitcoin’s gains without going through the process of acquiring Bitcoin, such as signing up for an exchange and going through various verification methods.

That said, the Bitcoin ETF, in and of itself, is quite limited. The first so-called Bitcoin ETF, the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO), launched in October 2021. However, this ETF doesn’t invest directly in the asset, but in Bitcoin futures exchange-traded funds as an alternative, making ProShares’ offering more of a “false” ETF.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Bitcoin price drops to $39K, but data shows leverage traders dreaming of $50K

Multiple factors are pushing BTC price below $40,000, but derivatives data shows pro traders are neutral, and holding out hope for a quick trend reversal.

On Monday, Bitcoin (BTC) dropped to $40,500, reaching a crucial level that erased the gains from the previous three weeks when the price peaked at $48,200 on March 28.

According to analysts, the United States Federal Reserve balance sheet reductions are adding pressure to stocks and risk assets, with Bitcoin standing to lose appeal.

Decentrader co-founder filbfilb agreed with these powerful headwinds by arguing that the Fed's action could influence the BTC price trend "for months to come."

Bitcoin reacted unfavorably to a resurgent dollar, with the U.S. dollar currency index (DXY) returning above 100 for the first time since May 2020. While some consider the DXY event a temporary show of strength, its impact on crypto markets was clear.

Data shows margin traders are bullish

Margin trading allows investors to borrow cryptocurrency to leverage their trading position with the hope of increasing returns. Traders can borrow Tether (USDT) to open a leveraged long position, whereas Bitcoin borrowers can only short the cryptocurrency because they are betting on its price declining. Unlike futures contracts, the balance between margin longs and shorts isn't always matched.

OKEx USDT/BTC margin lending ratio. Source: OKEx

The above chart shows that traders have been borrowing more USDT recently, a fact shown by the ratio increasing from 9.6 on April 8 to the current 15.9, which is the highest level in two months.

Even though the margin lending reached 5 on March 28, the indicator favored stablecoin borrowing.

Crypto traders are usually bullish, so a margin lending ratio below 3 is deemed unfavorable. Thus, the current level remains positive, just less confident than the previous week.

Related: Bitcoin keeps falling as former BitMEX CEO gives $30K BTC price target for June

The long-to-short ratio is slightly bearish

The top traders' long-to-short net ratio excludes externalities that might have impacted the longer-term futures instruments. By analyzing these positions on the spot, perpetual and futures contracts, one can better understand whether professional traders are leaning bullish or bearish.

There are occasional methodological discrepancies between different exchanges, so viewers should monitor changes instead of absolute figures.

Exchanges' top traders Bitcoin long-to-short ratio. Source: Coinglass

Excluding a brief spike in OKX's Bitcoin long-to-short ratio on April 6, professional traders have slightly reduced their long (bull) positions since March 31. This movement is directly opposite to the previously presented margin trading markets which showed a significant sentiment improvement in the first week of April.

So what could be the cause of the distortion? The most likely factor is the fact that Bitcoin's price has been down 32% in 12 months. Even as BTC flirted with $48,000 on March 29, futures traders were not yet ready to build bullish positions using leverage.

It’s possible to have a "glass half full" reading from the same data because Bitcoin price dropped 15% since March 29, and yet, there is no sign of bearishness from the margin and BTC futures trading. From the perspective of derivatives, traders are playing it safe, but are also still hopeful that $50,000 and higher is possible in the near term.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Law Decoded: Crypto risks, imaginary and real, and creative ways of addressing them, April 4–11

The Treasury admits there’s not much crypto-aided sanctions evasion going on, stablecoins attract regulatory attention, and a fourth futures-based BTC ETF secures approval.

Last week, there was a lot of regulatory talk about crypto-related risks. While this is very common in itself, some angles and proposed solutions to such risks came across as novel. In the United States, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued a letter to commercial and savings banks under its purview, or all federally chartered banks, asking financial institutions to notify the FDIC about all ongoing and planned crypto-related activities. Apparently, standardized guidance for all banks would not fit the bill since the risks seem to be unique in each case.

In Singapore, the local monetary authority became concerned about the “reputational risks” that virtual asset service providers that have originated in the city-state but operate overseas can pose. The proposed solution is bringing such firms under the Singaporean licensing regime that, until now, applied only to firms with domestic operations.

Finally, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler — one of the most vigilant guardians of the nation’s investor folk – spoke about how retail crypto investors must be protected. Embedded within the usual talking points that were previously unheard of calls for the SEC staff to explore ways of regulating platforms that facilitate the trading of both securities and non-securities, including closer coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). At the same time, other crypto-related fears have begun to dissipate, best exemplified by the “Russia sanctions evasion” narrative taking a major hit.

Crypto for real people

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen testified before the House Financial Services Committee last week and fielded numerous questions about the relationship between digital assets and national security, including several on the potential threats that crypto could pose to the robustness of the international financial sanctions regime. Yellen reassured representatives that using blockchains to circumvent sanctions is difficult and that her agency hasn’t seen any significant crypto-aided sanctions evasion in practice. It is fair to say that regular Russians, rather than the wealthy corrupt elites, rely on digital assets as they flee the country or get stranded abroad, as evidenced by their firsthand accounts. According to the government’s latest estimate, Russian citizens could be holding as much as $130 billion in cryptocurrency.

Stablecoins in crosshairs

Emerging regulatory frameworks around stablecoins continue to be one of the hottest areas of crypto policy. Speaking at another event last week, Secretary Yellen said that the Treasury was hard at work helping Congress draft legislation that would ensure the stablecoin sector’s risk resilience. Another related piece of legislation dropped on April 7, introduced by Senator Pat Toomey called the Stablecoin Transparency of Reserves and Uniform Safe Transactions (TRUST) Act. To Toomey, the main risk associated with stablecoins is that such assets could be categorized as securities. Thus, the bill proposes that convertible “payment stablecoins” should be exempt from securities regulations. Stablecoin offerings used as a means of payment are also the major focus of the United Kingdom regulators, where Her Majesty’s Treasury announced plans to amend the legislation around payments accordingly. This is just one of the assortment of measures that the U.K.’s financial authorities announced against a background of crypto-bullish rhetoric from Economic Secretary of the Treasury John Glen and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak.

More futures before spot

Days after rejecting yet another application of a Bitcoin (BTC) spot exchange-traded fund (ETF), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission greenlighted the fourth futures-based BTC ETF. Teucrium Bitcoin Futures Fund has joined the ranks of similar offerings by ProShares, Valkyrie and VanEck. Inevitably, the development has triggered a new round of the conversation on whether a spot-based Bitcoin product is on the way. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas opined that the approval is a “good sign” for a prospective spot BTC offering. Meanwhile, Grayscale CEO Michael Sonnenshein, whose company is working on converting its GBTC fund into a BTC spot ETF, has found language in the text of the SEC’s Teucrium approval that strengthens the case for a spot approval. Meanwhile, ProShares, the firm behind the first regulated Bitcoin futures ETF, filed a registration statement for an exchange-traded product that will allow investors to short Bitcoin futures contracts.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Pro traders turn into bears after Ethereum price dropped to $3,200

Regulatory uncertainty, potential competition from tech giants and a market nearing exhaustion are all factors impacting ETH price.

After a 42% rally over a three-week period, Ether (ETH) peaked at $3,580 on April 3 and since then, a 12% correction to $3,140 has taken place.

Tech giants launching their own smart contract platforms and regulatory uncertainty might have impacted investors’ sentiment and derivatives metrics also show worsening conditions that confirm professional traders' shift toward a bearish sentiment.

Ether/USD price at FTX. Source: TradingView

On April 6, the Financial Times reported that Meta is reportedly planning to introduce virtual currency and lending services. This move is aimed at exploring alternative sources of revenue for Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger.

United States Senator Pat Toomey, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, also drafted a bill proposing a regulatory framework for stablecoins. The legislation requires issuers to back up their stablecoin reserves with assets "that are cash and cash equivalents or level 1 high-quality liquid assets denominated in U.S. dollars."

Despite Ether’s price correction to $3,200, the network’s value locked in smart contracts increased 13% in 30 days to $85.6 billion. Thus, it is worth exploring whether the mood of derivatives traders was impacted by the recent price rejection.

Derivatives show Ether traders flipping bearish

To understand whether the market has flipped bearish, traders must look at the Ether futures contracts' premium, also known as the "basis." Unlike a perpetual contract, these fixed-calendar futures do not have a funding rate, so their price will differ vastly from regular spot exchanges.

A trader can gauge the market bullishness level by measuring the expense gap between futures and the regular spot market.

Ether perpetual futures 8-hour funding rate. Source: Coinglass.com

Futures should trade at a 5% to 12% annualized premium in healthy markets. Yet, as displayed above, Ether's annualized premium has decreased from 6% on April 5 to the current 4.5%.

Related: The FDIC wants US banks to report on current and intended crypto-related activities

Options markets flirt with pessimism

To exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument, traders should also analyze the options markets. The 25% delta skew compares similar call (buy) and put (sell) options. The metric will turn positive when fear is prevalent because the protective put options premium is higher than similar risk call options.

The opposite holds when greed is prevalent, causing the 25% delta skew indicator to shift to the negative area.

Ether 30-day options 25% delta skew. Source: Laevitas.ch

The 25% skew indicator has been ranging between 4% and 8% since March 22, indicating balanced pricing for bullish and bearish options. However, the correction to $3,140 on April 7 caused the metric to momentarily test 9.5%, the threshold for a neutral-to-bearish sentiment.

While the current 7% reading is still neutral, it is safe to say that Ether pro traders became more uncomfortable as Ether traded down 12% in four days. Presently, there is a mild sense of bearishness in the market.

Of course, none of that can predict when Ether will continue to downtrend but considering the current derivatives data, there's less demand for leverage longs.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Bitcoin price drops to $43.5K, but data and BTC’s market structure project strength

BTC price took a sharp tumble below a key support level, but data shows April 6’s dip could be another buying opportunity for bulls.

Bitcoin (BTC) has been struggling to break the $47,000 resistance and even with April 6’s drop below $44,000, there is still mounting evidence that the market structure is healthy. 

On Dec. 3, 2021, Bitcoin initiated a 25.6% correction that lasted 18 hours and culminated with a $42,360 low. Four months later, the price remained 18% below the $56,650, closing on Dec. 2, 2021.

Much has changed over that period, and hard evidence comes from other sections of the sector. Between February 15 and April 2, 2022, enterprise software development firm MicroStrategy announced the acquisition of 4,197 Bitcoin.

Inflows to Canadian Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) also hit an all-time high, according to data from Glassnode. These investment vehicles in Canada have increased their holdings by 6,594 BTC since January to a historical high of 69,052 BTC under management. The Purpose Bitcoin ETF, a spot instrument, currently has $1.68 billion worth of assets.

Among the wave of recent buyers is Terra’s Luna Foundation Guard (LFG), which is on a mission to acquire $3 billion worth of BTC as a reserve for TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin.

CoinMetrics data shows that the active on-year Bitcoin supply reached 36.8% on April 5, its lowest level since September 2010.

Bitcoin trailing 1-year active supply. Source: CoinMetrics

The chart shows how “diamond hand” holders have not moved their coins over the past 12 months.

Futures markets show traders are uncomfortable near $47,000

To understand how professional traders are positioned, including whales and market makers, let's look at Bitcoin's futures and options market data. The basis indicator measures the difference between longer-term futures contracts and the current spot market levels.

The Bitcoin futures annualized premium should run between 5% to 12% to compensate traders for "locking in" the money for two to three months until the contract expiry. Levels below 5% are extremely bearish, while the numbers above 12% indicate bullishness.

Bitcoin 3-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The above chart shows that this metric dipped below 5% on Feb. 11, reflecting traders’ lack of demand for leverage long (bull) positions. The sentiment changed on March 26 after the basis rate regained the “neutral” 5% threshold. Even though this occurred, there are no signs of confidence from pro traders, according to the futures premium.

Options traders worry about downside risk

Currently, Bitcoin seems to lack the strength needed to break the $47,000 resistance, but traders should use derivatives to gauge professional investor sentiment. The 25% delta skew is a telling sign whenever arbitrage desks and market makers overcharge for upside or downside protection.

If those traders fear a Bitcoin price crash, the skew indicator will move above 10%. On the other hand, generalized excitement reflects a negative 10% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew: Source: Laevitas.ch

Data shows that the skew indicator has been ranging between 0% and 8% since March 9. Albeit not signaling fear, these options traders are overcharging for downside protection. From the BTC options markets perspective, there's a slightly higher risk for unexpected downward price swings.

The neutral-to-bearish Bitcoin derivatives data offers an interesting opportunity for bulls. If somehow the $47,000 resistance is broken, this will be a surprise for most investors. Two positive effects will arise from that event: a short squeeze from derivatives markets and room for buyers to use futures for leverage.

If Bitcoin’s futures premium had been running above 10%, traders would face a much higher cost to add long (bull) positions. Bulls seem better prepared to deal with the $47,000 price resistance considering the sound market structure that is marked by the absence of exaggerated buyers’ leverage and this provides better odds of success.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Traders predict $3,800 Ethereum, but multiple data points suggest otherwise

Is it time for a correction after ETH rallied 34% in two weeks? On-chain metrics and derivatives data say yes.

Investors tend to not complain about a price rally, except when the chart presents steep downside risks. For example, analyzing Ether's (ETH) current price chart could lead one to conclude that the ascending channel since March 15 is too aggressive.

Ether price at FTX, in USD. Source: TradingView

Thus, it is only natural for traders to fear that losing the $3,340 support could lead to a retest of the $3,100 level or a 12% correction down to $3,000. Of course this largely depends on how traders are positioned, along with the Ethereum network's on-chain metrics.

For starters, the Ethereum network’s total value locked (TVL) peaked at ETH 32.8 million on Jan. 23, and has since gone down by 20%. TVL measures the number of coins deposited on smart contracts, including decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, NFT marketplaces, social networks, collectibles and high risk.

Moreover, the Ethereum network’s average transaction fee bottomed at $8 on March 16, but has recently increased to $15. Thus, one must evaluate if that reflects lesser use of decentralized applications (DApps) or users benefiting from layer-2 scaling solutions.

Ether's futures premium shows little excitement

Traders should analyze Ether futures market data to understand how professional traders are positioned. The quarterly contracts are whales and market makers' preferred instruments because they avoid the fluctuating funding rate from the perpetual futures.

The basis indicator measures the difference between longer-term futures contracts and the current spot market levels. The Ether futures annualized premium should run between 5% to 12% to compensate traders for "locking in" the money for two to three months until the contract expiry.

Ether 3-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The current 6% Ether futures basis sits slightly above the minimum threshold for a neutral market. An annualized futures premium below 5% is deemed bearish, while numbers above 12% indicate bullishness.

This data tells us that pro traders are far from excited but in the past couple of months there was a 4% or lower basis rate, which reflected bearish sentiment. Thus, there has been an improvement, but not enough to cause excessive demand from buyers.

To exclude externalities that might have influenced derivatives data, one should analyze the Ethereum network's on-chain data. For example, monitoring the network use tells us whether actual use cases support the demand for Ether.

On-chain metrics raise concerns

Measuring the number of active addresses on the network provides a quick and reliable indicator of effective use. Of course, this metric could be misguided by the increasing adoption of layer-2 solutions, but it works as a starting point.

7-day average of active addresses on Ethereum. Source: CoinMetrics

The current 593,260 daily active addresses average is a 2% increase from 30 days ago, but it's nowhere near the 857,520 seen in May 2021. Data shows that Ether token transactions are not showing signs of growth, at least on the primary layer.

Traders should proceed to DApp usage metrics but avoid exclusive focus on the TVL because that metric is heavily concentrated on lending platforms and decentralized exchanges (DEX), so gauging the number of active addresses provides a broader view.

Ethereum network 30-day DApps activity. Source: DappRadar

Ethereum DApps saw an average monthly 11% decrease in active addresses. Overall, the data is disappointing because the smart contract network was specifically designed to host decentralized applications.

As a comparison, the DApps on the Polygon network gained 12% while Solana (SOL) saw a 6% user increase. Unless there is decent growth in Ether transactions and DApp usage, the $3,340 daily close support will probably unwind.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies

Pro traders curb their enthusiasm until Ethereum confirms $3,400 as support

ETH price has shown a strong recovery since bottoming at $2,500, but derivatives data suggests pro traders are moving with caution.

Ether (ETH) price jumped 11% between March 26 and March 29 to reach $3,480, which is the highest level in 82 days. Currently, the price is down 9% year-to-date but does data support the belief that the altcoin has resumed its uptrend toward a new all-time high? 

Institutional investors seem excited that the CoinShares Digital Asset Fund Flows Weekly Report revealed on Tuesday that the exchange-listed crypto products inflows reached the highest level in three months. Data showed that investment products for digital assets saw net deposits of $193 million last week.

At the same time, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, an executive office of the President of the United States, launched a study to offset energy use related to digital assets. Furthermore, on March 9, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an executive order directing various federal agencies to examine the implications of digital assets.

The Ethereum network's planned move to Proof-of-Stake consensus can also explain some of its outperformance versus Bitcoin. The transition has been postponed multiple times, although Q1, 2022 was mentioned on the official roadmap. By eliminating the burden of digital mining, Ethereum plans to become more efficient and allow cheaper and faster transactions.

Even with the anticipation of the PoS upgrade, the rally of the past 3 days is not enough to cause Ether pro traders to flip bullish according to derivatives metrics.

The Ether futures premium is neutral

To understand how larger-sized traders are positioned, one should look at Ether's futures and options market data. For instance, the basis indicator measures the difference between longer-term futures contracts and the current spot market levels.

The annualized premium of Ether futures should run between 5% and 10% to compensate traders for "locking in" the money for two to three months until the contract expires. Levels below 5% are bearish, while numbers above 10% indicate excessive demand from longs (buyers).

Ether 3-month futures’ annualized premium. Source: Laevitas

The above chart shows that Ether's basis indicator recovered from 2% on March 13 to the current 6%. This level exceeds the 5% bear sentiment threshold but at the same time signals a weak demand for opening ETH futures longs.

Even though the metric points to a neutral-to-bearish sentiment, one must remember that Ether remains down 9% year-to-date and 28% below its $4,800 all-time high.

Options traders fear ETH could drop lower

The 25% options delta skew is extremely useful as it shows whether arbitrage desks and market makers are overcharging for upside or downside protection.

If option investors fear an Ether price crash, the skew indicator will move above 10%. On the other hand, generalized excitement reflects a negative 10% skew.

Related: Waiting on the executive order: how users and financial professionals may benefit from it

Ether 30-day options 25% delta skew: Source: Laevitas

The skew indicator dropped below 10% on March 18, exiting the "fear" level as these options traders are no longer overcharging for downside protection. The current 7% level remains close to a bearish threshold.

Although there was a modest improvement in Ether's futures premium, the indicator remains neutral. Basically, ETH options markets are pricing a slightly higher risk for downside, so professional traders are not confident that the current $3,400 support will hold.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

$113B Asset Manager Files to Launch XRP ETF in US Amid Shifting Crypto Policies