1. Home
  2. Gary Wang

Gary Wang

FTX used Python code to fake its insurance fund figure: Gary Wang

FTX’s so-called “Backstop Fund” figure was a big lie, according to the former chief technology officer of the crypto exchange

Crypto exchange FTX used hidden Python code to misrepresent the value of its insurance fund — a pool of funds meant to prevent user losses during huge liquidation events — according to testimony from FTX co-founder Gary Wang. 

In a damning new testimony on Oct. 6, FTX's former chief technology officer, Gary Wang, said that FTX’s so-called $100 million insurance fund in 2021 was actually fabricated, and also never actually contained any of the exchanges’ FTX tokens (FTT) as claimed.

Instead, the figure shown to the public was calculated by multiplying the daily trading volume of the FTX Token by a random number close to 7,500.

When the prosecution surfaced the above tweet — among other public statements of its value — and asked Wang whether this amount was accurate he replied with a single word: “No.”

“For one, there is no FTT in the insurance fund. It's just the USD number. And, two, the number listed here does not match what was in the database.”

An exhibit in the Oct. 6 trial shows the alleged code used to generate the size of the so-called "Backstop Fund” or public insurance fund. 

FTX's insurance fund was designed to protect user losses in case of huge, sudden market movements and its value was often touted on its website and social media.

According to Wang’s testimony, however, the amount contained within the fund was often insufficient to cover these losses.

For example, in 2021, a trader was able to exploit a bug in FTX's margin system to take an outsized position in MobileCoin, which resulted in a loss to the tune of hundreds of millions dollars for FTX, according to Wang.

When Bankman-Fried realized that the insurance fund had all but been exhausted, Wang said he was told to make Alameda “take on” the loss. This was supposedly in an attempt to hide the loss, as Alameda’s balance sheets were more private than those of FTX.

Related: Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton slams Sam Bankman-Fried sympathizers

In addition to revealing the allegedly fraudulent nature of FTX’s insurance fund, Wang claimed that he and Nishad Singh were prompted by Bankman-Fried to implement an “allow_negative” balance feature in the code at FTX, which allowed Alameda Research to trade with near-unlimited liquidity on the crypto exchange.

On Oct. 5 Wang — who has already pleaded guilty to all charges pressed against him — admitted to committing wire fraud, commodities fraud and securities fraud with Bankman-Fried, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison and former-FTX director of engineering Nishad Singh.

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market — Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

Alameda Tapped Billions of Dollars in FTX User Funds As Early as 2019, Says Co-Founder Gary Wang: Report

Alameda Tapped Billions of Dollars in FTX User Funds As Early as 2019, Says Co-Founder Gary Wang: Report

The co-founder of bankrupt digital asset exchange FTX says that its sister firm Alameda had been using billions of dollars worth of FTX customer assets for trading purposes as early as 2019. According to lengthy court transcripts released by Inner City Press on the social media platform X, FTX co-founder Gary Wang was recently questioned […]

The post Alameda Tapped Billions of Dollars in FTX User Funds As Early as 2019, Says Co-Founder Gary Wang: Report appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

FTX court filing reveals former Alameda CEO’s $2.5M yacht purchase

The payment to the American Yacht Group was disclosed under the category of payments benefiting any insider within one year prior to the crypto exchange collapse.

FTX Debtors have disclosed a series of financial statements revealing any transactions that benefited company executives shortly before the major cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse in November 2022.

In a recent court filing with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, several payments that directly benefited senior company executives at FTX and Alameda Research were disclosed. Specifically payments or property transfers executed within one year preceding the collapse of FTX.

Court Filing in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Source: Kroll

In March 2022, a transaction of $2.51 million was directed from the company to the American Yacht Group, benefiting former Alameda Research co-CEO Sam Trabucco.

Just a few months after this transaction, Trabucco confirmed ownership of a boat while informing his followers about his resignation in an August 2022 tweet.

Related: FTX founder’s expert witnesses could cost up to $1.2K an hour

The filing also revealed that Bankman-Fried and FTX co-founder Gary Wang purchased Robinhood shares in April 2022, totalling $35,185,242. They continued their acquisitions of Robinhood in May 2022, spending an additional $19.45 million. It discloses that Bankman-Fired held a 90% share ownership, with Wang owning the remaining 10%.

Recently, Robinhood declared that it has bought back all shares previously held by FTX and Alameda Research.

On Aug. 31, Robinhood completed the purchase of 55,273,469 shares for roughly $606 million. Following the purchase announcement, Robinhood’s chief financial officer Jason Warnick emphasized that the company is happy with the result:

“We are happy to have completed the purchase of these shares and look forward to executing on our growth plans on behalf of our customers and shareholders.” 

Several cash payments were disclosed to executives including Bankman-Fried and Wang, as well as FTX director of engineering Nishad Singh, former FTX chief marketing officer Darren Wong, and former FTX chief operating officer Constance Wang, all within the twelve months prior to the collapse.

However, it notes that the disclosures are limited to fiat currency. “Responses to this question do not currently include all transfers of cryptocurrency, other digital assets or other assets,” it stated.

Magazine: Tiffany Fong flames Celsius, FTX and NY Post: Hall of Flame

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

FTX’s former law firm hit with lawsuit alleging it set up shadowy entities

The suit claims “shadowy entities” set up by Fenwick & West were allegedly used by FTX and former top executives to misappropriate customer funds.

FTX’s former primary counsel Fenwick & West LLP has been hit with a class-action suit claiming it aided the crypto exchange’s alleged multi-billion dollar fraud.

An Aug. 7 filing by a group of FTX customers in a California District Court alleged the law firm set up several “shadowy entities” allowing FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried and other executives to adopt “creative but illegal strategies” to perpetuate fraud.

The suit claims Fenwick & West provided services to FTX that “went well beyond those a law firm should and usually does provide,” such as structuring acquisitions by FTX US in ways that circumvented regulatory scrutiny and supplying staff to execute strategies the law firm proposed.

The “shadowy entities” were named as North Dimension and North Wireless Dimension, which the suit alleged siphoned misappropriated FTX customer funds.

Highlighted excerpt from the class complaint against Fenwick & West. Source: CourtListener

The plaintiffs said Fenwick & West aided and abetted FTX’s alleged fraud by choosing not to intervene in a series of misrepresentations supposedly made by FTX to its customers.

There was an implied agreement between FTX US, other FTX affiliates and Fenwick & West to deceive customers, the class suit said — something that appealed to the law firm because it “stood to gain financially” from FTX’s alleged misconduct, it added.

Bankman-Fried, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, former FTX co-founder Gary Wang and former FTX engineering lead Nishad Singh were the four so-called FTX insiders listed by the plaintiffs.

Fenwick & West was named in a similar class-action lawsuit in February that also alleged it assisted Bankman-Fried and FTX in setting up its business.

The February lawsuit — which also targeted FTX investor and venture capital firm Sequoia Capital — claimed the services provided by Fenwick & West were central to Bankman-Fried’s fraud.

The law firm recently hired peer firm Gibson Dunn to assist with legal matters related to its alleged role at FTX, according to a June 21 Reuters report.

Related: Prosecutors will still consider Sam Bankman-Fried’s alleged campaign finance scheme at trial

FTX collapsed and filed for bankruptcy in November 2022 when it was unable to process a large volume of customerwithdrawals.

Bankman Fried remains under house arrest and faces 12 charges including wire fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. He is set to have two criminal trials in October and March.

Prosecutors said on Aug. 8 that they plan to re-add a charge relating to illegal campaign finance, which was previously dropped due to it potentially violating a treaty obligation with the Bahamas.

Cointelegraph contacted Fenwick & West for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Magazine: Deposit risk: What do crypto exchanges really do with your money?

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

FTX financial controls were a ‘hodgepodge’ of apps, says court filings

A court filing alleged apps such as Excel spreadsheets and Slack messages were used to manage the assets and liabilities of FTX and its entities.

FTX was run by three inexperienced people “not long out of college,” who relied on “a hodgepodge” of online shared documents and communications across a series of different apps to manage the multi-billion dollar empire according to FTX CEO John Ray III.

In an April 9 court filing in a Delaware Bankruptcy Court, John J Ray III gave his first detailed account of the control failures at FTX.

Ray stated that his restructuring team had “identified extensive deficiencies in the FTX Group’s controls” from a lack of appropriate financial and accounting controls to an inadequate group management structure and record-keeping process.

FTX apparently “relied on a hodgepodge of Google documents, Slack communications, shared drives and excel spreadsheets” to manage its assets and liabilities.

FTX used the accounting software QuickBooks, which Ray said was designed for “small and mid-sized businesses” and not for a firm that operates across “multiple continents and platforms” such as FTX.

Related: Names of non-US FTX users demanded by mainstream media outlets

FTX’s bookkeeping was reported to have been neglected as around 80,000 transactions were left as unprocessed accounting entries in “catch-all QuickBooks accounts titled ‘Ask My Accountant.’”

Ray emphasized that co-founders Sam Bankman-Fried and Gary Wang, along with former engineering director Nishad Singh had the “final voice in all significant decisions,” despite very limited experience.

“These three individuals, not long out of college and with no experience in risk management or running a business, controlled nearly every significant aspect of the FTX Group.”

Wang and Singh’s significant control over FTX was noted by an unnamed FTX executive who stated that “if Nishad [Singh] got hit by a bus, the whole company would be done. Same issue with Gary [Wang].”

It was noted that the company couldn’t provide a complete list of its employees at the time of bankruptcy filing in Nov. 2022.

FTX failed to file its financials on time at the end of financial reporting periods and did not carry out back-end checks to identify and correct material errors.

Brett Harrison, the president of FTX.US, raised concerns with Bankman-Fried and Singh regarding “the lack of appropriate delegation of authority, formal management structure, and key hires at FTX.US.”

In response, Harrison’s bonus was significantly reduced and he was instructed to apologize to Bankman-Fried by the firm's internal counsel, which he refused to do. It was reported that Harrison resigned following the disagreement.

Ray stated in a Feb. 6 court filing that when he took control of FTX in Nov. 2022 there was “not a single list of anything” related to bank accounts, income, insurance or personnel, causing a “massive scramble for information.”

He pushed back against the motion to assign an independent examiner to the bankruptcy case out of fears that “inadvertent errors” could result in “hundreds of millions of dollars of value being destroyed.”

Magazine: US and China try to crush Binance, SBF’s $40M bribe claim: Asia Express

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

SBF’s lawyers signal need to push back October criminal trial

Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyers said they’re still waiting on evidence from federal prosecutors and may need more time to prepare a defense.

Lawyers representing FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried have flagged that it may be necessary to delay the criminal trial for the former crypto exchange executive to give him more time to prepare his defense.

In a March 8 letter to United States District Judge Lewis Kaplan, Bankman-Fried’s lawyers said they weren’t formally requesting a date change just yet, but it may be needed, as they’re still awaiting a “substantial portion” of evidence to be turned over to them and more charges had been laid against the FTX founder in late February.

The criminal trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 2 and will focus on the fraud charges brought by the Department of Justice.

According to the letter, DOJ prosecutors are holding evidence from devices belonging to Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of FTX’s sister trading firm Alameda Research, and Zixiao “Gary” Wang, an FTX co-founder.

Both Ellison and Wang have pleaded guilty to fraud charges and are cooperating with the DOJ.

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers said they are also waiting for contents from “computers belonging to two other former FTX/Alameda employees.” They anticipate the production of the evidence from the devices “will be voluminous and critically important to the defense.”

Excerpt from the letter to Judge Kaplan requesting an amended trial schedule. Source: CourtListener

The letter also noted the superseded indictment against Bankman-Fried unsealed on Feb. 22 that bumped the number of charges from eight to 12, with new charges relating to conspiracy and fraud.

Bankman-Fried pleaded not guilty to the original eight charges brought against him in December.

One of Bankman-Fried's lawyers, Christian Everdell, wrote in the letter:

“Depending on the volume of the additional discovery and the timing of the productions, it may be necessary to request an adjournment of the trial, currently scheduled to begin on October 2, 2023.”

“While we are not making such an application at this time, we wanted to note this issue for the Court now,” Everdell added.

Related: Lawyers’ picnic: FTX counsel and advisers rake in $34M in January

Bankman-Fried is currently released on a $250 million bond. He has been under house arrest in Palo Alto, California at his parent's house and his online activities are restricted.

The schedule for the trial and bail conditions will be discussed at a hearing on Friday, March 10.

The FTX founder also faces separate fraud-related civil lawsuits from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the Securities Exchange Commission. Both have been delayed until after Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial.

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

Report: Former FTX Director of Engineering Nishad Singh Negotiating Plea Deal with Prosecutors 

Report: Former FTX Director of Engineering Nishad Singh Negotiating Plea Deal with Prosecutors Another member of Sam Bankman-Fried’s inner circle allegedly plans to plead guilty to criminal charges for his role in the alleged fraud that occurred at the cryptocurrency exchange FTX. According to unnamed sources familiar with the matter, Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, is attempting to negotiate a deal with New York prosecutors. Sources […]

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

Sequoia Capital, Paradigm among VCs facing “tricky” FTX investor lawsuit

It’s a “tricky case,” as it is unknown what obligation these firms actually had to “completely separate investors,” suggests a crypto lawyer.

Users of bankrupt crypto exchange FTX have reportedly taken aim at financiers who promoted the platform suggesting their efforts added an “air of legitimacy” to the now-defunct exchange, a case labeled as "tricky" by a crypto lawyer.

A Feb. 15 Bloomberg report revealed a class-action suit filed Feb. 14 by FTX investors against venture capital firm Sequoia Capital and private equity firms Thoma Bravo and Paradigm.

The firms were accused by the investors of touting “their own investments” of hundreds of millions of dollars in FTX.

It was alleged the firms were involved in a promotional marketing campaign in 2021 which the investors alleged added an “air of legitimacy” to the disgraced crypto exchange.

The three firms were all investors in FTX’s $900 million Series B round in July 2021, the largest raise in crypto history, in which various partners of the firms spoke highly of former FTX CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried.

In a statement following the funding announcement in July 2021, Paradigm’s co-founder Matt Huang called Bankman-Fried a “special” founder who is “stunningly ambitious.”

Speaking to Cointelegraph, crypto lawyer Liam Hennessy, partner at Australian law firm Gadens, stated that it is a “tricky case,” and he questions “what obligation Sequoia and others” have to “completely separate investors.”

He added that despite the fact Sequoia’s due diligence wasn’t great, it doesn’t make it “liable to others.”

Hennessy believed it could be a case of “buyer beware” – as there is no suggestion that Sequoia wasn’t “playing within the regulatory rules.”

Cointelegraph contacted Sequoia Capital, Thoma Bravo and Paradigm for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Related: Charity tied to former FTX exec made $150M from insider deal on FTT tokens: Report

A separate Feb. 15 Bloomberg report revealed that in the same court filing Sam Bankman-Fried and his father, along with former FTX and Alameda Research executives Caroline Ellison, Nishad Singh and Gary Wang were all issued with a subpoena, an order for a person to attend court, to provide further evidence.

It was stated that Joseph Bankman, Ellison, Wang, and Singh are due to attend court on Feb. 16 while Sam Bankman-Fried is expected to attend on Feb. 17.

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

Robinhood board gives nod to buy Sam Bankman-Fried’s $578M stake

The shares were bought by FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and co-founder Gary Wang last year and have been tussled over since the collapse of FTX.

Robinhood’s board of directors has approved a plan to buy back the $578 million stake in their company that was bought by former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX co-founder Gary Wang last year.

Robinhood confirmed in its fourth-quarter report, published Feb. 8, that it had received board approval to buy back the stake.

“Our Board authorized us to pursue purchasing most or all of our shares that Emergent Fidelity Technologies bought in May 2022," said Robinhood’s chief financial officer Jason Warnick, adding:

“The proposed share purchase underscores the confidence the Board of Directors and management team have in our business.”

The FTX co-founders bought 55 million shares of Robinhood stock — worth $578 million at current prices — in May through Emergent Fidelity Technologies by taking out loans directly from FTX’s sister firm, Alameda Research.

On Jan. 9, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) seized the 55 million shares — equating to around 7% of the company.

The assets were seized following a court filing from cryptocurrency lending platform BlockFi to reclaim the shares, as Bankman-Fried and Wang used the shares as collateral to take out a loan from BlockFi.

Warnick told CNBC on Feb. 8 that Robinhood has been working with the DOJ on a plan to facilitate the buyback but nothing has been finalized yet.

The shares in question have been the subject of more than one dispute.

On Dec. 23, FTX asked the court to stop BlockFi from claiming the Robinhood shares, following the exchange’s collapse in November. 

Meanwhile, although Emergent Fidelity didn’t file for bankruptcy in November like FTX and other FTX-affiliated entities, the firm did file for bankruptcy protection on Feb. 3.

Q4 crypto revenue falls

The United States-based trading platform saw cryptocurrency-based transaction revenues from its “Robinhood Web3 Wallet” fall 24% to $39 million in the fourth quarter, compared to the third quarter. Revenue in the third quarter fell 12%, compared to the second quarter.

Overall net revenues increased by 5% to $380 million in Q4 2022. However, the firm reported an overall net loss of over $1 billion in 2022.

Related: Robinhood Web3 wallet enters beta, taps Polygon as first blockchain

The fall in crypto-related revenue comes despite the firm managing to roll out the Robinhood Web3 Wallet to more than 1 million waitlisted users over the quarter.

In just a few hours since the earnings report was released, Robinhood’s stock, tickered HOOD, is up 4.78%, according to Google Finance.

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses

Voyager subpoenas FTX and Alameda execs as judge orders fee examiner

On behalf of Voyager, law firm Kirkland & Ellis subpoenaed four executives from FTX and Alameda requesting an enormous array of documents.

Lawyers representing bankrupt crypto broker Voyager Digital have served former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and other FTX and Alameda Research executives with subpoenas requesting information.

The subpoenas have a very wide scope, with Voyager’s lawyers seeking copies of any documents and communication between FTX entities and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ) according to the Feb. 6 filing.

Amongst a plethora of other requested documents, the lawyers also want to see information relating to the loan portfolio between Alameda and Voyager as well as FTX’s financial condition before and after it filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11, 2022.

The other executives who were served subpoenas include former Alameda CEO, Caroline Ellison, FTX co-founder, Gary Wang and FTX’s head of product, Ramnik Arora — each was asked to provide the requested information by Feb. 17.

Little is known about Wang (left) who co-founded FTX with Bankman-Fried, Ellison (right) has cooperated with authorities since the exchange's bankruptcy.

The financial ties between Voyager and Alameda are deep, with Alameda seeking to recover $446 million it repaid Voyager. In a Jan. 30 filing, it argued because it had paid Voyager back within 90 days of filing for its own bankruptcy it can “claw back” the funds for the benefit of its creditors.

In response, Voyager claimed its creditors had suffered “substantial harm” after Alameda made a bid for Voyager’s assets that it was unable to honor, which cost Voyager $100 million and rendered Alameda’s claim subordinate to those of its other creditors.

Related: SBF’s lawyers move to block release of bail guarantors’ identities

Meanwhile, United States bankruptcy judge Michael Wiles said he would be appointing a fee examiner to look at professional fees in Voyager’s Chapter 11 case, according to a Feb. 7 Law360 report.

Wiles reportedly suggested the professional fees incurred within the bankruptcy case were higher than he expected, and the argument provided by the U.S. Trustee had convinced him that a fee examiner would be beneficial.

Wiles did note that an examiner could end up costing the estate more than it would be able to save in other professional fees, however, and recommended a cap was put on the examiners own fees.

FDIC Warns 68 US Banks in Danger of Insolvency As Lenders Face $364,000,000,000 in Unrealized Losses