1. Home
  2. hearing

hearing

House Republicans urge SEC to rescind ‘disastrous’ SAB 121

The House and Senate Republicans claimed the SEC evaded the notice and comment rulemaking process required by the Administrative Procedure Act by issuing SAB 121.

More than 40 United States Republicans have called on the US securities regulator to rescind its “disastrous” Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 rule after a repeal bill received bipartisan support before being vetoed.

SAB 121 upends custody rules for cryptocurrencies, weakens consumer protections, and stifles financial innovation, House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry, Senator Cynthia Lummis and 40 other politicians claimed in a Sept. 23 letter to the Gary Gensler-led Securities and Exchange Commission.

The 42 politicians further claimed that SAB 121 — a proposed rule mandating that SEC-reporting entities custodying cryptocurrencies must record those holdings as liabilities on their balance sheets — was issued without consulting any “prudent regulators” and that the accounting approach “deviates from established accounting standards.”

Read more

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

5 lowlights of Gary Gensler’s evasive testimony before Congress

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission chief was asked whether the purchase of Pokemon trading cards is a security transaction and whether Bitcoin is a commodity.

Blamed for “kneecapping” the U.S. capital markets and slammed for dodging questions around Bitcoin and Pokemon cards, Gary Gensler appears to have had one hell of a grilling from Congress this week.

On Sept. 27, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission chief again found himself in front of lawmakers in a scheduled hearing to discuss his agency’s oversight of the markets.

Here are some of the highlights and lowlights of the hearing.

“You are the Tonya Harding of securities regulations.”

One of the more colorful analogies came from United States Representative Andy Barr, who accused Gensler of “kneecapping” the U.S. capital markets with regulatory red tape.

Barr referred to an old testimony from Gensler, where Gensler argued that the U.S. is the largest, most sophisticated and innovative capital market in the world and that it shouldn’t be taken for granted as “even gold medalists must keep training.”

“With all due respect Mr. Chairman, if the U.S. capital markets are a gold medalist, you are the Tonya Harding of securities regulations,” said Barr.

“You are kneecapping the U.S. capital markets with the avalanche of red tape coming out of your Commission.”

Barr is presumably referring to a scandal where U.S. ice skater Tonya Harding hired an assailant to attack her rival, Nancy Kerrigan, in the lead-up to the 1994 United States Figure Skating Championships and the Winter Olympics. Kerrigan ended up not competing in the U.S. championships.

“I wish the Biden administration would say you're fired.”

Meanwhile, U.S. Representative Warren Davidson also ripped into Gensler, saying he hoped that the Biden administration would fire him.

“I wish the Biden administration would say you're fired,” said Davidson.

Davidson accused Gensler of pushing a “woke” political and social agenda and abusing his role as the SEC’s Chair.

The U.S. representative added that he hopes the SEC Stabilization Act he introduced with U.S. Representative Tom Emmer could make that happen.

“You’re making the case for this bill [SEC Stabilization Act] every day you’re acting as the Chairman,” he concluded.

Gensler wasn’t given the chance to respond.

Gensler reiterates Bitcoin isn’t a security

Asked by U.S. House Committee on Financial Services chair Patrick McHenry whether Bitcoin is a security, Gensler eventually relented, stating that Bitcoin didn’t meet the Howey Test.

“It does not meet the Howey test which is the law of the land,” Gensler said, implying that Bitcoin isn't a security.

McHenry then suggested Bitcoin must be a commodity, which Gensler avoided answering, saying the test for that is outside the scope of U.S. securities laws.

Henry also suggested Gensler tried to “choke off the digital asset ecosystem” and refused to be transparent with Congress about the SEC’s connections with FTX and its former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried.

Gensler also wasn’t given the chance to respond to the claims made by McHenry.

Are Pokemon trading cards securities? It depends.

U.S. Representative Ritchie Torres used his time to quiz Gensler about his interpretation of what constitutes an investment contract.

Torres put Gensler to the test by asking whether purchasing a physical Pokemon trading card constitutes a securities transaction.

“Suppose I was to purchase a Pokemon card. Would doing so constitute a security transaction?”

Gensler responded — “I don’t know what the context is” — before eventually concluding it isn’t a security if it is purchased in a store. Torres then asked:

“If I were to purchase a tokenized Pokemon card on a digital exchange via a blockchain, is that a security transaction?”

“I’d have to know more,” replied Gensler.

Related: Coinbase crypto lobbying campaign to focus on 4 swing states

Gensler then explained that it’s when the investing public can anticipate profits based upon the efforts of others — that’s the core of the Howey Test. Representative Torres called Gensler's "evasions" as "deafening and damning."

A sign of defiance

Meanwhile, among the back-and-forth cross-examinations between Gensler and U.S. Representatives, eagle-eyed observers noticed a Coinbase “Stand With Crypto” logo behind the SEC Chair.

The Coinbase-led initiative is a 14-month-long campaign that launched in August. It aims to push for cryptocurrency legislation in the U.S.

Coinbase also ran a “Stand with Crypto Day,” which took place in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 27 to advocate for better cryptocurrency innovation and policy.

Magazine: Binance, Coinbase head to court, and the SEC labels 67 crypto-securities: Hodler’s Digest, June 4-10

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

Ronaldinho denies part in alleged $61M crypto scam at congressional hearing

The former pro soccer player said in a congressional hearing that his likeness was improperly used to market an allegedly fraudulent crypto scheme.

Retired pro soccer star Ronaldinho Gaúcho has testified at a congressional hearing in Brazil, denying his involvement in an alleged $61 million crypto pyramid scheme that bore his name.

On Aug. 31 Ronaldinho appeared before a parliamentary committee inquiry where he refuted any role in the scheme called "18kRonaldinho" that promised 2% daily returns on crypto. A lawsuit was filed against the firm seeking $61 million in damages.

Ronaldinho claimed he was never partnered with th company and it used his name and image without his authorization, arguing he was also a victim of the purported scheme.

During the hearing, images were shown of 18kRonaldinho’s marketing that depicted Ronaldinho.

The inquiry showed an image of Ronaldinho with the text “Your money yielding up to 2% a day” (translated). Source: YouTube

He said the pictures were taken as part of a contract he signed in July 2019 with a subsidiary of the company that sells watches but that contract was terminated later that year in October and was never executed.

The inquiry’s president Aureo Ribeiro asked Ronaldinho if he intended to reimburse those who invested in the company to which Ronaldinho said he would remain silent.

He also did not answer when asked about the $61 million lawsuit.

Related: Breaking victim ‘trust’ in scammer is key to beat crypto scams, exchanges say

Ronaldinho had failed to appear before two previous hearings related to the inquiry, most recently on Aug. 24 in which he blamed weather conditions for not being able to attend.

The latest Aug. 31 hearing was his last chance to appear before Congress — if he didn’t he faced possible fines or arrest in which authorities would’ve forcibly taken him to appear at the hearing.

The inquiry was launched in June to investigate purported crypto pyramid schemes and is being carried out by Brazil’s lower house, the Chamber of Deputies.

It’s investigating a total of 11 companies alleged by the country’s Securities and Exchange Commission to have falsely promised high returns using crypto.

Magazine: Tornado Cash 2.0 — The race to build safe and legal coin mixers

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

‘Who the hell’ is Prometheum and what did it say to Congress about SEC compliance?

A testimony given at a United States House of Representatives hearing by the blockchain firm’s co-founder, Aaron Kaplan, has drawn the attention of those in the crypto space.

The relatively under-the-radar crypto company Prometheum has been thrust into the spotlight after a recent testimony from its co-founder before a United States House Committee, discussing crypto regulatory clarity.

On June 13, Prometheum co-founder and co-CEO Aaron Kaplan appeared before the U.S. House at a hearing to discuss providing regulatory clarity to the crypto industry.

Contrary to recent commentary from crypto industry players such as Coinbase, Kaplan’s testimony appears to be supportive of regulating crypto under current securities laws — a view also shared by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Attention was also brought to Kaplan’s testimony on social media, including a widely shared June 14 Twitter thread from Castle Island Ventures partner Matt Walsh, who shared what he claims are “bizarre” facts about the company and its co-founder.

The thread has also prompted many — including Cardano and Ethereum co-founder Charles Hoskinson — to ask just who Kaplan and Prometheum are, and why they appear to be unheard of before.

The Wall Street-based Prometheum was founded in 2017 by Aaron and Benjamin Kaplan, co-CEOs of the firm. The pair are also listed as attorneys at the financial services-focused law firm Gusrae Kaplan.

Subsidiaries of the company are notable for their registrations with the SEC and approvals from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

In May, subsidiary Prometheum Ember Capital was the first firm to offer custody of digital assets as a qualified custodian after receiving FINRA approval to operate as a special purpose broker-dealer for digital assets.

In October 2022, its subsidiary Prometheum Ember ATS launched its SEC-registered alternative trading system offering digital asset trading, clearing, settlement, and custody.

What did Kaplan say?

In his prepared testimony, Kaplan argued that multiple frameworks provided by the SEC have “clearly laid out” a “compliant path forward for crypto in the United States.”

He even provided a glowing review of the regulator, calling it “the most capable financial markets regulatory agency in the world.”

Kaplan claimed crypto exchanges and custodians “are required to be regulated by the SEC” and slammed those not currently regulated as being “reckless, unlawful platforms.”

He went on to say existing securities laws and regulations apply to cryptocurrencies and those who argue for new crypto-specific laws are “simply not willing to comply.” He added new laws are “not in the best interest of the investing public or the blockchain industry.”

Related: Crypto industry ‘destined’ to be BTC-focused due to regulators: Michael Saylor

However, some have criticized the crypto firm, saying Prometheum doesn’t have much to show product-wise despite its years in business and regulator approvals.

During the hearing, Kaplan was asked by Representative Mike Flood if Prometheum offered trading for Bitcoin (BTC) or Ether (ETH), which together make up nearly 65% of the $1 trillion crypto market cap, according to CoinGecko.

Kaplan responded to both questions by saying it did not.

'Bizzare' claims

Meanwhile, theories about the company are are swirling on social media, with some alleging the firm's links to the Chinese Communist Party, pointing to 2019 SEC filings from Prometheum stating HashKey and Shanghai Wanxiang Blockchain are “strategic partners and joint venturers.”

Others have pointed to Prometheum’s team that includes former SEC and FINRA staffers. 

Cointelegraph contacted Prometheum to ask for a comment surrounding some of these claims.

DeFi Dad, Hall of Flame: Ethereum is ‘woefully undervalued’ but growing more powerful

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

Bitcoin rebound falters amid SEC crackdown on exchanges, raising chance of a BTC price capitulation

Regulatory concerns continue to impact the entire crypto market and this week’s BTC options expiry could play a decisive role in pushing Bitcoin price under $26,000.

Bitcoin (BTC) price lost steam after a failed retest of the $27,400 resistance on June 6, signaling that investors became less confident after the recent regulatory actions by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission against Binance and Coinbase. Both exchanges are being sued on multiple counts, including failure to register as licensed brokers and offering unregistered securities. 

The SEC might have a difficult case ahead

According to Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith, the SEC is trying to circumvent formal rulemaking processes and deny public engagement. Meanwhile, Insider Intelligence crypto analyst Will Paige said the SEC’s intent is to police the space through enforcement in the absence of a regulatory framework.

Those criticisms explain why investors may be clinging to their hopes in the U.S. Financial Services Committee hearing, scheduled for June 13.

The potential overreach of the SEC has caused ripples multiple times,including the U.S. legislative. Senator Bill Hagerty, for instance, stated that the regulating agency is "weaponizing their role", and publicly called out the SEC chairman Gary Gensler.

Further supporting the thesis that the cryptocurrency space can function without crypto-banks, as the centralized exchanges are commonly known, is the sudden increase in decentralized finance (DeFi) volumes.

The median trading volume across the top three decentralized exchanges jumped 444% between June 5 and June 7. As DEX volumes surged, net outflows on Binance reached $778 million, the difference between the value of assets entering and exiting the exchange.

Bitcoin has been trying to claim back the $27,000 support, but that might be harder than expected given the upcoming $670 million weekly option expiry on June 9.

Bulls have been caught by surprise with the negative newsflow

It is worth noting that the actual open interest for the June 9 expiry will be lower since bulls concentrated their wagers above $27,000. These traders got excessively optimistic after Bitcoin’s price gained 9% between May 25 and May 29, testing the $28,000 resistance.

Bitcoin options aggregate open interest for June 9. Source: CoinGlass

The 0.63 put-to-call ratio reflects the imbalance between the $410 million in call (buy) open interest and the $260 million in put (sell) options. However, if Bitcoin’s price remains near $26,500 at 8:00 am UTC on June 9, only $38 million worth of these call (buy) options will be available. This difference happens because the right to buy Bitcoin at $27,000 or $28,000 is useless if BTC trades below that level on expiry.

Related: US District Court issues summons for Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao over SEC action

Bitcoin bears aim for sub-$26,000 to increase their payout

Below are the four most likely scenarios based on the current price action. The number of options contracts available on June 9 for call (bull) and put (bear) instruments varies depending on the expiry price.

The imbalance favoring each side constitutes the theoretical profit:

  • Between $25,000 and $26,000: 100 calls vs. 5,100 puts. Bears in total control, profiting $125 million.
  • Between $26,000 and $27,000: 1,500 calls vs. 3,900 puts. The net result favors the put (sell) instruments by $65 million.
  • Between $27,000 and $28,000: 4,200 calls vs. 1,300 puts. The net result favors the call (bull) instruments by $80 million.
  • Between $28,000 and $29,000: 8,700 calls vs. 700 puts. The net result favors call (bull) instruments by $225 million.

This crude estimate considers the put options used in bearish bets and the call options exclusively in neutral-to-bullish trades. This oversimplification disregards more complex investment strategies.

Given that Bitcoin longs using futures contracts were liquidated to the tune of $100 million on June 5, bulls might have less margin required to try pumping the BTC price above the $27,000 mark. Consequently, bears seem closer to scoring a decent profit on Friday's options expiry.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

Senators slam bank execs for blaming collapses on crypto, pocketing millions

Senator Lummis noted that Signature Bank’s Scott Shay mentioned digital assets 10 times in his testimony about the bank’s collapse.

A former Signature Bank executive has been slammed for seemingly trying to place the blame for his bank’s collapse on crypto while purportedly being able to pocket millions in bonuses and stock options. 

During a Senate Banking Committee hearing on May 16, United States Senator Cynthia Lummis lashed out at Scott Shay, the former chairman of the now-defunct bank, in relation to his prepared statement on what led to his bank's collapse.

In his testimony, Shay noted the bank began accepting deposits from businesses in the digital asset sector in 2018 and then “significantly” reduced its digital asset deposits in 2022 as the industry experienced volatility.

He said his bank was seized by regulators after “a bank with strong ties to the digital asset sector” fell, which then led to $16 billion being withdrawn from Signature.

“It looks like there has been a lot of deflection of blame onto those particular depositors that deal in digital assets and onto regulators, but you haven’t accepted any blame yourself,” Lummis said.

Shay, however, denied pointing the finger at digital assets during the Senate hearing.

“You use the term 10 times during your testimony,” responded Lummis.

'Keeping millions'

During another part of the hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren blasted Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) CEO Gregory Pecker and Signature Bank’s Shay for allegedly “keeping millions after recklessly crashing banks.”

“Right now, the law says that people like Mr. Becker and Mr. Shay [...] can pay themselves tens of millions of dollars in bonuses and stock options, and when the banks blow up, Mr. Becker and Mr. Shay get to keep all the money. And that is just plain wrong.”

“If we don't fix it, every CEO for these multibillion-dollar banks will keep right on loading up on risks and blowing up banks, and everybody else is going to have to pay for it.”

Warren noted that she is working within a bipartisan group in the Banking Committee to introduce a bill that can claw back “these crazy paychecks.”

Cointelegraph contacted Shay and Becker for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Related: Signature Bank failed to understand risks associated with crypto: FDIC chair

In April, Adrienne Harris, superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) reportedly said it was “ludicrous” that one could blame crypto for Signature Banks collapse.

During a Chainalysis Links conference in New York City, she said the events leading up to the failure of Signature were instead a “new-fashioned bank run.”

The NYDFS took control of Signature Bank on March 12, claiming it was protecting the U.S. economy from “system risk.” The bank was the latest failure following the collapse of the crypto-friendly Silvergate Bank and SVB.

Hall of Flame: William Clemente III tips Bitcoin will hit six figures toward end of 2024

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

FTX’s Bankman-Fried Is Allegedly Using Alameda Funds to Pay for Legal Defense

FTX’s Bankman-Fried Is Allegedly Using Alameda Funds to Pay for Legal DefenseAccording to two sources close to FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced co-founder, gave his father, Stanford Law professor Joseph Bankman, millions of dollars. The funds are reportedly being used to pay for legal costs. The sources said that Bankman-Fried allegedly gave “at least $10 million” from the now-defunct quantitative trading firm Alameda Research to his […]

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

FTX seeks to claw back $460M from Bankman-Fried-backed VC firm

While the funds represent a small portion of FTX’s overall asset shortfall, the settlement means the firms can avoid a costly legal battle.

Bankrupt crypto exchange FTX is seeking to recover $460 million of allegedly misappropriated customer funds from venture capital (VC) firm Modulo Capital, which received a sizeable investment from Alameda Research last year.

As previously reported, FTX’s sister trading firm, Alameda Research was understood to have invested around $400 million in Modulo in 2022 — one of the biggest investments undertaken by FTX under Bankman-Fried’s leadership.

In a March 22 filing, FTX claim the investment from Alameda Research was under the direction of Sam Bankman-Fried, with Alameda investing $475 million in Modulo in a series of transfers beginning in May 2022.

On June 16, Alameda entered into a limited partnership agreement with Modulo,  according to the filing, which resulted in Alameda transferring the aforementioned funds to Modulo in exchange for ownership of 20% of Modulo’s Class A shares.

In bankruptcy proceedings, payments made to entities prior to the bankruptcy filing may be eligible to be clawed back and redistributed to creditors. While the claw-back period is 90 days for most unsecured creditors, it is one year for “insiders,” a term that includes general partners.

As per the settlement agreement, Modulo has agreed to repay $404 million in cash and will give up its claim to $56 million worth of assets held on FTX’s crypto exchange, representing nearly 97% of FTX’s initial investment.

The settlement would also result in Alameda losing any claim to its Modulo shares.

Modulo Capital was founded in March 2022 by three former executives at Jane Street, a New York-based firm that once employed Bankman-Fried and Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison.

Bankman-Fried is also rumored to have been in a romantic relationship with one of its founders, Xiaoyun “Lily” Zhang, which some have theorized was the motivation behind his push to invest in the obscure VC firm. This rumor has not been verified. 

The deal will still need to be confirmed by United States Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey, with a motion hearing set for April 12.

Related: FTX debtors file lawsuit against exchange’s Bahamian arm on ownership of property

In its latest presentation to creditors on March 17, FTX noted claims against it surpassed $11 billion, compared to just $4.7 billion in assets for a total shortfall of nearly $7 billion, so while the $460 million settlement would be a huge win for creditors it still only represents less than 7% of the current shortfall.

FTX’s summary of claims vs assets in a presentation to creditors. Source: Kroll

Magazine: Best and worst countries for crypto taxes — plus crypto tax tips

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

FTX’s Bankman-Fried could ‘conceivably’ get bail revoked, says judge

A federal judge said there was "probable cause" to believe that SBF engaged in activities that could land him in jail.

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried could “conceivably” have his bail revoked after a federal judge said there was “probable cause” to believe he may have engaged in attempted witness tampering. 

In the Feb. 16 hearing on Bankman-Fried’s bail conditions, Judge Lewis Kaplan said there was “probable cause to believe that he [Bankman-Fried] has committed or attempted to commit a federal felony while on release, namely witness tampering” according to multiple reports.

Kaplan suggested that this could “conceivably” see the FTX founder sent back to jail until his trial date in October.

Kaplan noted however that the Feb. 16 hearing was not a bail revocation hearing, but added that it “could get there, conceivably.”

"Why am I being asked to turn him loose in this garden of electronic devices?” Kaplan reportedly said.

Law Professor Richard Painter echoed the sentiment in a Feb. 17 tweet, suggesting that witness tampering might not be a good idea given his current circumstances:

“Hey Crypto Bro: Witness tampering while out on bail is a great way to go right back to jail.”

On Feb. 15, prosecutors asked Judge Kaplan to further restrict Bankman-Fried’s device usage to a single monitored computer and cellphone in a letter.

Prosecutors had pointed to Bankman-Fried’s recent device usage as cause for concern, seeking to further restrict and monitor his usage “with limited exceptions.”

During the hearing, Judge Kaplan suggested that it was naive to believe that these restrictions would stop him from using the internet, given that Bankman-Fried is living with his two parents, who both have laptops and cellphones.

Prosecutor Nicholas Roos seemingly agreed, suggesting there may not be a “great solution,” which prompted Kaplan to imply that revoking Bankman-Fried’s bail could eliminate these risks, noting:

“There is a solution, but it’s not one anybody has proposed yet.”

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers however argued that they need him to be able to work on his defense, claiming: “We cannot go through these extensive financial records without him.”

Related: Judge allows release of identities of guarantors behind Sam Bankman-Fried’s bail

The former FTX CEO has been prohibited from using certain messaging apps as of Feb. 9 after he was found to have contacted potential witnesses. He was also temporarily banned from using a VPN after prosecutors accused him of using it on two occasions on Jan. 29 and Feb. 12.

The VPN ban was not extended in the Feb. 16 hearing.

Many from the crypto community have expressed disbelief that Bankman-Fried is yet to have his bail revoked under the circumstances.

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000

FTX Bankruptcy: Judge Delays Decision on Appointing Independent Examiner Amid Cost Concerns

FTX Bankruptcy: Judge Delays Decision on Appointing Independent Examiner Amid Cost ConcernsJudge John Dorsey has delayed his decision on whether to appoint an independent examiner in the FTX case. At the latest hearing, Dorsey acknowledged that the cost to debtors could reach tens of millions of dollars. Currently, the bankruptcy judge is hopeful that the issue will be resolved through a mutually agreed upon solution between […]

US Bitcoin ETFs net $365 million in a single day as Bitcoin rallies above $65,000