1. Home
  2. Identity

Identity

Identity and the Metaverse: Decentralized control

What will our identity look like in the Metaverse? A decentralized Web3 suggests it’ll be completely in our control, but growing amounts of information stored online suggest otherwise.

“The Metaverse” and “Web3” are the buzzwords of the moment, with their concepts permeating across the worlds of fintech, blockchain, and now even mainstream media. With decentralization thought to be at the core of the Web3 Metaverse, the promise of a better user experience, security and control for consumers is what’s driving its growth. But with users’ identities at the heart of the Metaverse, coupled with unprecedented amounts of data online, there are concerns over data security, privacy and interoperability. This has the potential to hinder the development of the Metaverse, but both regulated and self-sovereign identities could play an important role in ensuring that we truly own our identity and data within this new space.

Related: Digital sovereignty: Reclaiming your private data in Web3

What is the Metaverse?

Although the concept of the Metaverse has been around for a while, it was recently brought into the spotlight when Mark Zuckerberg chose to rename his company “Meta” (to the annoyance of many in the blockchain community!). With the digitalization of many aspects of our lives already underway, many argue that the Metaverse will touch everyone’s future, and it’s set to significantly change the way we interact with technology.

It’s widely contested as to what the Metaverse will look like and consist of, but it’s thought to be a catch-all for many interpretations in which the Metaverse will replicate the physical world in a digital context and enable similar interactions to what we experience in our day-to-day lives. In theory, it will encompass augmented reality, the digital economy and Web3.

Related: How NFTs, DeFi and Web 3.0 are intertwined

Inclusion and identity

The Metaverse presents an infinite number of opportunities for people and businesses from various sectors and differing needs. It was recently stated that one of the biggest changes within the Metaverse would be inclusion, meaning anyone with access to the internet will be able to utilize its benefits. This includes the 1 billion people worldwide who are currently unbanked finally being able to access the global economy via the Metaverse.

Notably, digital identities will lie at the core of the Metaverse, ranging from a digital avatar to customize using augmented reality to the ability to automatically book a restaurant online. It will give people of all genders, ages and backgrounds the chance to express themselves in new ways and will allow for new types of interactions and communities to form online. In this regard, some argue that it’s thought to be a safer space for any person to thrive in compared to the real world. However, with more data than ever being stored online comes concerns over trust and its privacy.

Related: The creator economy will explode in the Metaverse, but not under Big Tech’s regime

The decentralization of power and control

Blockchain technology using a decentralized model will underpin Web3 and the Metaverse, which is predicted to offer new levels of openness. Web2 tends to be thought of as a few centralized tech companies that harvest users’ data, and this practice has received criticism due to surveillance and exploitative advertising. In contrast, Web3 will be the opposite, which will empower all those involved, with users owning their digital assets, personal data and identity.

However, with such a huge number of players involved in creating and maintaining the Metaverse, ranging from those building the underpinning technologies to NFT creators and virtual reality and augmented reality producers, as well as the vast amount of sensitive information online, there are concerns as to whether users will actually have full control over their credentials. We’ve already seen the potential for damage through Facebook’s data breach a few years ago, and Cointelegraph recently highlighted a Facebook whistle-blower who has already raised concerns about the privacy of users’ information shared with Meta in the Metaverse.

The importance of self-sovereign identities

Forward-thinking tech companies are a step ahead of the game, though. A few of them have recognized the potential issue over control and privacy and have begun to develop game-changing solutions to ensure the decentralized control and protection of users’ information. They believe that the Metaverse needs to be designed on open standards, with self-sovereign identities (SSI) being the silver bullet in addressing trust within the Metaverse.

SSIs are digital identities focused on verified and authentic credentials linked to real-world verification data, such as biometrics, that are managed in a decentralized way. By utilizing blockchain technology and zero-knowledge proofs, users can self-manage their digital identities without depending on third parties to centrally store and manage their data. Most importantly, this information is stored permanently within a non-custodial wallet that is controlled by the user and accessed temporarily within the Metaverse when the owner decides. This verified data will give them access to and ownership over their assets by simply being themselves, and it is thought that this will fundamentally change the way data is owned and controlled by that user.

Related: Self-custody, control and identity: How regulators got it wrong

What role will regulation play in this?

Nevertheless, many argue that regulation also needs to play an important role within the Metaverse in order to give both consumers and businesses the confidence to operate in it and ensure that their data and identity is protected.

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey recently tweeted how he believes that Web3 won’t necessarily increase users' power in the way that many predict, since it will simply take that power away from the government and put it in the hands of venture capitalists investing in blockchain, or big tech companies like Meta. And, for this reason, we need regulatory oversight.

Many believe that countries will need to embrace the digital economy and Metaverse in order to compete in the global digital and economic spheres, but many of the existing regulations in place will need significant expansion to cover the Metaverse. We’ve already seen growing governmental regulation of the crypto space in the last few years, ranging from outright bans of crypto transactions in China to El Salvador adopting Bitcoin as legal tender, but in terms of identity and control of data in the Metaverse, there’s a long way to go. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the U.K.’s Data Protection Act could certainly play a part, but improvements are needed if we are to effectively protect consumers and the data they provide.

Related: The new path to privacy after EU data regulation fail

It’s clear that the Metaverse will lead to seismic change, with this new system architecture likely disrupting people, places and economies. With the hope of a new and better experience for users that addresses the issues of today, there are also huge levels of uncertainty surrounding the use of individual data. With new technologies emerging, there’s a considerable amount of preparation and consideration needed to ensure the Metaverse develops in a way that benefits everyone involved, and with identities at its heart, these factors are more important than ever.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Lottie Wells is the senior PR and communications manager at Wirex. With over six years of experience in the fintech industry ranging from digital payments to global remittances, she has contributed to campaigns empowering access to the financial system and the mass adoption of cryptocurrency. She is a strong believer in the benefits of the digital economy, and is an advocate for both the sector and women’s involvement within it, having spoken at the EMEA Women in Payments Symposium and having contributed to publications such as The Asia Times.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

4-digit ENS domains spike in demand this week and continue soaring

Ethereum users rushing to purchase scarce three- and four-digit names have been driving NFT market sales activity.

Since Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, released 10,000 four-digit .eth domains ranging from 0000 to 9999, the nonfungible token collection has caused a stir among NFT investors, speculators and enthusiasts alike. After all 10,000 ENS names sold out in one day, the number of people registering for ENS names and purchasing these digit number names on secondary markets has significantly affected the market's trading volume.

According to a Dune Analytics dashboard for ENS, the spike in sales began on April 21, and the number of eth. name registrations has since jumped from 2,721 to 21,188 by April 28. Over the last seven-day period, ENS domains' trading volume on OpenSea climbed by 3,333% to 2,613 ETH, or $7.3 million, at the time of writing. The last 48 hours have seen the most ENS NFT trading in the secondary market with the most expensive domain so far, "008.eth," selling for 20 ETH, or $56,125, on April 29.

Each ENS web name is an NFT that is minted and sold like any other nonfungible token. These decentralized domains that end in .eth can act like Ethereum wallet addresses, cryptographic hashes and website URLs. As decentralized applications, wallets, exchanges and marketplaces increasingly support NFT usernames, whether from ENS or from competitors like Unstoppable Domains, Web3 users are embracing the value that can be tied to a digital identity.

Holders who have scooped up ENS names from 0-9999 have formed an exclusive Discord channel called the 10kClub. At the time of writing, nearly 4,000 ENS holders had joined this social club. Members even created a refrain that was continuously posted throughout the Discord chat stating, "I AM MY NUMBERS AND MY NUMBERS ARE ME." According to the 10kClub Twitter page, there is no roadmap. 

Consequentially, the app.ens.domains website has been crashing this past week and leading users to a 404 error page because the website couldn't be found on the server. On April 29, the ENS team tweeted multiple times that they are working to resolve the issue.

Related: The concept and future of decentralized Web3 domain names

Not just individuals but also major brands and corporations have recently registered their names with Ethereum Name Service, such as Puma and Budweiser. 

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

Buenos Aires to accept crypto for tax payments, launch DLT-backed citizen profiles

Blockchain and virtual currencies are set to become vital part of the Argentine capital’s 12-step digital transformation effort.

The capital of Argentina and an agglomeration with more than 12 million citizens, Buenos Aires will make blockchain a vital part of its digitalization drive. Specifically, the city will accept public financial transactions in crypto. 

As city Mayor Horacio Rodríguez Larreta revealed in his Steve Jobs-styled presentation on April 25, the 12-step development plan titled “Buenos Aires +” envisions a significant increase in crypto and blockchain adoption.

The city authorities intend to launch a platform for citizens’ digital IDs that will hold all the necessary information, such as birth dates and vaccine certificates, medical records, education documents. To make sure that such sensitive data is well-protected, the platform will run on distributed ledger technology (DLT). As Larreta emphasized in his speech:

“All that information stream, which will widen in a geometrical progression, will be protected by blockchain technology [...] We are going to become the pioneers of that technology adoption so the users could control their data on their own.”

The move would mark the second step out of 12 towards the digitalized Buenos Aires. What’s even more intriguing is that the ninth step entails the option for citizens to pay their taxes in cryptocurrencies. While the city, itself, won’t hold crypto on its public accounts, it will convert the citizens’ cryptocurrency transactions into Argentinian pesos.

As Buenos Aires’ Secretary of Innovation and Digital Transformation Diego Fernández specified in a separate statement, the city is going to partner with local crypto exchanges, such as SatoshiTango, Buenbit, Ripio and Belo, to facilitate such payments.

In December 2021, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin visited Buenos Aires during Web3 protocol The Graph’s launch anniversary. On that sojourn, he had a meeting with the former president of Argentina, Mauricio Macri, who also happens to be the ex-mayor of Buenos Aires and Larreta’s fellow member at the “Republican Proposal” party.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

Today’s biggest crypto gainers: Why REQ, MFT and KEY rallied over 20%

REQ, MFT and KEY overcome the noise to post double-digit gains as decentralized payments and identity management trend higher amid ongoing global developments.

Cryptocurrency bulls continued to face stiff headwinds headed into the week of March 14 that began with a vote in Europe about whether to outlaw proof-of-work cryptocurrencies, which was ultimately rejected

Despite these pressures, however, several cryptocurrency projects have managed to post gains in excess of 20% on March 14, thanks to new partnerships and protocol updates.

Top 7 coins with the highest 24-hour price change. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro

Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that the biggest gainers over the past 24-hours were Request Network (REQ), Hifi Finance (MFT) and Selfkey (KEY).

Metaverse payments with Request Network

Request Network (REQ) is an Ethereum-based decentralized payment system that allows users to create, share or fulfill a request for payment through secure channels without the need for an intermediary.

VORTECS™ data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro began to detect a bullish outlook for REQ on March 13, prior to the recent price rise.

The VORTECS™ Score, exclusive to Cointelegraph, is an algorithmic comparison of historical and current market conditions derived from a combination of data points including market sentiment, trading volume, recent price movements and Twitter activity.

VORTECS™ Score (green) vs. REQ price. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro

As seen in the chart above, the VORTECS™ Score for REQ began to pick up on March 13, around eight hours before the price increased 45% over the next day.

The increase in momentum for REQ comes following the addition of support for the Jarvis Network’s Euro stablecoin (jEUR) to go along with the project’s ongoing push to become the go-to payment provider for activities in the evolving Metaverse.

Hifi Finance adds community governance

Hifi Finance is a decentralized lending protocol that allows crypto holders to borrow against the value in their assets using bond-like instruments that represent an on-chain obligation that settles on a specified date in the future.

Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that since hitting a low of $0.006 on March 6, the price of MFT climbed 5% to hit a daily high at $0.009 on March 14 as its 24-hour trading volume spiked 1,131% to $235 million.

MFT/USDT 4-hour chart. Source: TradingView

The sudden spike in price and trading volume for MFT follows an announcement that Hifi Finance will soon be integrating governance capabilities for MFT holders who will be able to create and vote on proposals regarding the future development of the protocol.

Related: Bitcoin could crush Russian ruble by rising another 140%, classic technical setup suggests

Decentralized identity management

Selfkey (KEY) is a blockchain-based identity platform that is looking to advance the Know Your Customer (KYC) process and support the ethos of Self-Sovereign Identity through its KYC-Chain.

VORTECS™ data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro began to detect a bullish outlook for REQ on March 7, prior to the recent price rise.

VORTECS™ Score (green) vs. KEY price. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro

As seen in the chart above, the VORTECS™ Score for KEY elevated into the green on March 7 and hit a high of 85 around 72 hours before the price began to increase 35.6% over the next four days.

The turnaround in the price of KEY comes as the project works to integrate SelfKey and its KYC-Chain decentralized identity management system across the cryptocurrency ecosystem as a way to satisfy global KYC/Anti-Money Laundering regulations.

The overall cryptocurrency market cap now stands at $1.732 trillion and Bitcoin’s dominance rate is 42.7%.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

FTX joins other crypto goliaths to promote autonomy over sensitive information

FTX and Alkemi add to the list of 14 crypto companies partnered with Verite, including Coinbase, Circle, Hedera Hashgraph, Ledger, Solana Foundation and more.

Centre, an open-source technology project developed by Coinbase and Circle, has onboarded crypto exchange FTX and Alkemi Network as its latest partners to collaborate on Verite. Verite is a set of shared decentralized identity protocols — developed by Centre — to empower crypto-centric individuals and businesses by granting total control of personal information. 

Supporting Verite’s commitment to collaborate on shared decentralized identity standards, FTX and Alkemi have added to the list of 14 crypto companies, which include Coinbase, Circle, Hedera Hashgraph, Ledger, the Solana Foundation and more.

Verite protocols are designed to help people and businesses keep track of their personal information and provide total control over how businesses use this information in the crypto economy. According to the company:

“Verite is returning autonomy over sensitive information to the individual while continuing to enable businesses to interact with identity-verified participants.”

Verite makes this possible by allowing users to cryptographically prove claims about their identities and carry those claims in the same crypto wallets where they store their digital assets. Centre CEO David Puth stated:

“We are pleased that our partners share our conviction that Verite’s identity standards will create a new level of clarity, privacy, and convenience to everyone transacting in the crypto economy.”

According to the announcement, Verite’s protocol integration into smart contracts, applications and websites does not introduce single-vendor or anti-competitive dependencies:

“Individuals will be able to use their credentials across the crypto ecosystem, making digital assets far more accessible to both crypto natives and novices.”

Related: FTX expands to Europe with CySEC approval

On Tuesday, FTX also expanded its crypto services into Europe soon after receiving regulatory approval from the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission.

As Cointelegraph reported, Switzerland-based FTX Europe will serve European crypto clients through a licensed investment firm across the European Economic Area.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

Opera browser to enable emoji-based web addresses

Opera users can now register and access emoji URLs and personal domains via emoji-centric integration with Yat.

Opera announced a partnership with Yat, a platform that allows the creation of emoji-based web addresses (URL), for integrating the emoji system in Opera’s browsers across all operating systems. Celebrating the announcement, the duo launched an event to distribute seven nonfungible tokens (NFTs) from legendary NFT artist Fvckrender valued at a floor price of 2.89 Ether (ETH).

Tech startup Yat's NFT project allows internet users to own personalized strings of emojis and use them as universal digital identifiers and wallet addresses. Recently, Opera released the beta version of its new Crypto Browser Project

The integration allows Opera users to surf the web by entering a string of emojis into the URL bar instead of letters and words. The "emojification" of Opera, as the company calls it, is a "new, easier and more fun" way to find and be directed to Yat pages, according to Jorgen Arnesen, executive vice president of mobile at Opera.

"The partnership marks a major paradigm shift in the way the internet works. Through the integration with Yat, Opera users are able to ditch .com or even words in their links and use emojis to be directed to websites."

Emojis embedded on web pages will link to the corresponding "y.at/" page automatically. Famous artists and celebrities were among the first to invest in and use their Yat emoji web addresses, simply called Yats. For example, rapper Lil Wayne's (y.at/alien-musical note) Yat page directs users to his record label's site and DJ Steve Aoki's (y.at/birthday cake-musical note) page takes users to his website.  

To mark the integration's launch, Yat and Opera are hosting a scavenger hunt for participants to compete for seven commissioned Fvck Crystals NFTs from NFT artist Fvckrender.

Related: Opera to integrate with Polygon, opening DApp ecosystem to 80M users

At the time of publication, Yat had a trading volume of 411 ETH ($1,263,422) on OpenSea.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop.

Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community. 

Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers.

Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. AlphaWallet also supports ENS avatars.

Zhang, also known as @Victor928, is among the top 30 delegates with the most voting power. When asked about how he plans to keep contributing to the DAO, Zhang said:

My biggest concern currently is voting power. The second largest voting power is Coinbase, a big corporation. We need to make sure the ENS is always a public group, always a neutral service, not influenced or controlled by any single party for its own interest.”

Related: ENS’ director of operations says that DAO-based governance ‘has always been the plan’

During the ENS token airdrop, 100 million total ENS tokens were distributed. While 25% went to users with .eth domans, another 25% of the tokens were allocated to those who “contributed in significant ways to ENS over the last four years.” The other 50% remains in the DAO community treasury.

As an external contributor, Zhang received 46,296.3 tokens. At the time of publication, this number of tokens amounted to $3,320,311.15. Zhang is among 27 contributors to receive this exact amount.

Zhang confirmed that he is, “holding it all. I’m not cashing any tokens out. As long as ENS continues to grow in the right direction, I don't see any competitors. So that means the value is much bigger than the current market cap, if we’re looking at it as an investment.”

The day of the airdrop, Brantly Millegan, AKA “Brantly.eth,” ENS’ director of operations, tweeted about the “responsibility” bestowed upon users and added how it’s up to the ENS community to use decentralized identity “wisely.”

Gregory Rocco from Spruce discussed this concept of decentralized identity with Cointelegraph. He developed Spruce, a secure sign-in with Ethereum, or SIWE software, precisely to help users own and control their digital identities, rather than give up that data to large corporations.

He is referring to large centralized corporations such as Google, Twitter or Facebook that offer web2 users the option to login to third-party apps and services using their respective Gmail or Facebook details instead of having to create and remember individual usernames and passwords for each new account.

According to Rocco, these traditional logins have the “ultimate control” over user identifiers because “if Google pulled the rug on you, you wouldn't just lose access to Google services, you'd also lose access to every service that you signed into using Gmail.”

The Ethereum Foundation and ENS recognized this issue and announced a Request for Proposal for the creation of a Sign-In with Ethereum package using Oauth. Spruce was selected to offer a decentralized identity alternative in September.

The goal of SIWE is to enable users to control their public identifier by owning their private keys or as Rocco put it: “‘your keys, your crypto’ but also ‘your keys, your identifier.’” Not only does Spruce’s toolkit establish a blockchain-based identity, but it also enables verifiable proof of identity, ownership of assets and DAO membership. This is important for a user to prove his or her value to the ENS ecosystem and earn rights to upcoming airdrops.

When asked how it feels to be a delegate, Rocco said:

“I feel this motivation to stay on top of everything for ENS and be on board and establish that social contract. I believe in the future of ENS and support participation in user-controlled systems. That paradigm is the first step towards enabling users to have more control over their identity and data.”

Decentralizing identity ultimately empowers the ENS DAO and builds up its credibility as a truly decentralized organization. Both Zhang and Rocco are champions of collective ownership and hope to further promote the usage of ENS in the Web 3.0 ecosystem.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

ENS’ director of operations says that DAO-based governance ‘has always been the plan’

Brantly Millegan, AKA “Brantly.eth,” discussed the rise of DAO governance, ENS’ new constitution and community voting rights following the protocol’s major ENS token airdrop.

On Monday, distributed domain protocol Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, launched its own governance token in an effort to distribute voting rights for its new decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, to active users of the ecosystem.

Cointelegraph spoke with Brantly Millegan, ENS’ director of operations, to learn more about the nonprofit’s decision to shift to a DAO model and his thoughts on the power of the ENS community:

“ENS is an open public protocol. The core components of ENS are decentralized and self-running (e.g., no one can take away another person’s .ETH name), but there are a few things that require some human discretion.”

He noted that previously, ENS was controlled by a four-of-seven multisignature scheme, with members of related projects acting as keyholders. They facilitated upgrades, managed the .eth pricing registration mechanism for domain names and handled the ENS treasury’s funds.

Replacing this multisig and passing ENS governance over to the community via a DAO “has always been the plan,” however, according to Millegan:

“Weu20re doing it now because we think both ENS and the DAO space have matured enough.”

When users claim ENS tokens allocated in the protocol’s recent airdrop, the service requires participants to immediately vote to ratify the proposed ENS Constitution and to authorize the DAO to take over the functions of the multisig.

Community members are also required to delegate their future DAO voting power before claiming their tokens. The delegate process allows a fewer number of active users to make decisions for the ENS community, rather than necessitating constant interactions from every tokenholder in the space each time a fresh vote is required. Though a large number of ENS contributors volunteered to act as potential delegates, users do not have to choose only from the platform’s suggested list. Rather, they may delegate their votes to any address they’d like, including their own.

Related: Mark Cuban issues burn notice on offensive ENS domain

Concerning ENS token distribution and the operation of a fair governance model, Brantly told Cointelegraph:

“The ENS DAO will [be] one-token-one-vote, but we’ve chosen distribution rules that favor egalitarianism and users over speculators.”

He explained that the nonprofit allocated tokens based on how many days an individual has held even a single ENS name, rather than by the number of domains an individual has registered.

Users who paid renewal fees up to eight years into the future are scheduled to receive an additional cache of tokens in the airdrop, and for folks who have their primary ENS name set, the number of tokens they are otherwise entitled to is multiplied by two. Participants on the protocol’s Discord and Twitter are eligible for additional claims as well.

The DAO will ultimately be in charge of spending any revenue received by the protocol’s nonprofit organization. According to ENS Constitution Article 3, funds are to be allocated to ENS development, the broader ecosystem and public goods within Web 3.0. Millegan noted that “there is no profit sharing motive” and that the token-based DAO system “allows for a large amount of flexibility.”

Within 24 hours of its launch, the new ENS governance token had already reached a fully diluted valuation of $3.16 billion. One day later, at the time of publication, this number has topped $8 billion and continues to rise.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

Adobe offers users the ability to verify NFT marketplace creations through metadata

The software company's Content Credentials can add an NFT creator’s wallet address and social media information to the metadata of tokens listed on the marketplace.

Many nonfungible token marketplaces are allowing digital collectors to identify artwork based on the wallet address of the creator through a partnership with software giant Adobe.

In an Oct. 26 announcement, Adobe said it would be partnering with major nonfungible token, or NFT, marketplaces including OpenSea, KnownOrigin, and SuperRare to allow users to verify the authenticity of the digital content. Adobe’s Content Credentials can add an NFT creator’s wallet address and social media information to the metadata of tokens listed on the marketplace.

"This partnership furthers our commitment to empowering users with more tools as we collectively rethink how we transfer digital goods on the internet,” said an OpenSea spokesperson. “Working in tandem with market leaders like Adobe and the growing NFT community, we will keep providing features to increase trust and transparency across the metaverse."

The feature will still seemingly have the option for NFT creators to remain pseudonymous, with them choosing to display crypto addresses linked to their online identity or full real social media profiles. Rarible, another marketplace offering Adobe’s digital verification system, said the feature would help “fight misinformation with attribution and verifiable truth of content.”

Related: Bragging rights: Twitter previews verification badge for NFT profile pics

According to data from DappRadar, OpenSea is the largest NFT marketplace by daily trading volume, reported as more than $50 million at the time of publication. SuperRare, Rarible, and KnownOrigin rank far below with roughly $1 million, $328,000, and $42,000 daily trading volume, respectively.

The platform recently faced criticism from many in the crypto space after OpenSea head of product Nate Chastain was accused of pumping up the prices of certain NFTs he was able to feature on the homepage and then sell. OpenSea said its employees are barred from buying and selling collections that are being featured on the platform.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?

Regulators are coming for crypto: Is digital identity the answer?

It’s time to give control over personal data in megadatabases managed by a handful of corporations and governments back to the people.

The regulators are closing in. It’s one thing to unbundle market functions to their parts ― custody, aggregators and Prime Brokerage ― to satisfy institutional compliance departments. It’s another to keep regulators happy.

From the Financial Action Task Force pushing forward with its guidance for Travel Rule compliance to the still-evolving European Markets in Crypto-Assets regulatory framework, and the somewhat clumsily-handed U.S. infrastructure bill, the regulators are slowly tightening their noose, and I fear this may be the start of a multi-year staring match ― with the decentralized finance (DeFi) market now firmly in their sights, too.

Related: DeFi: Who, what and how to regulate in a borderless, code-governed world?

Could digital identity help?

Whenever I’ve been asked what Bitcoin’s (BTC) killer app would be over the past 10 years, my response has always been “digital identity.”

Today, the world stands at a crossroads. One turn leads to ever-increasing and privacy-invading oversight now that money finally follows information onto the rails of the internet. Down the other is a road that sees personal data returned into the hands of individuals and out of mega AI-crunching databases controlled by a handful of corporations and governments.

It might have been anathema to early Bitcoin purists but reality bites and, throwing the growing debate regarding COVID-19 digital passports into the mix, we’re seeing the clouds of a perfect storm on the horizon that is likely to become the key narrative for the years ahead.

As central banks everywhere dismiss crypto assets as nothing more than chips on the roulette table in favor of their own thoroughly “groundbreaking” CBDCs, the excitement at their realization that they can now do both monetary policy and oversight is palpable.

The crypto markets have, unfortunately, already become a victim of their success, getting regulators all in a tizz to boot. The higher those “market cap” numbers have gotten (reaching $2 trillion earlier this year), the more itchy regulators have become. The Chinese have simply taken the sledgehammer approach and banned everything (apart from their recently launched CBDC, of course) while, in the West, regulators are (at best) taking a nuanced approach or else fighting with each other over whose purview it should come under.

Related: Authorities are looking to close the gap on unhosted wallets

With the majority of crypto economic activity still flowing through the major crypto exchanges and OTC desks, FATF forcing Travel Rule compliance on Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) may well keep the genie in its bottle for now while these on/off ramps remain easily identifiable. But what happens if, or when, a self-sustaining crypto economy emerges where the majority move beyond speculation and, instead, get “in” and stay “in”?

Or if DeFi grows beyond its sizeable, yet niche, playpen?

Fungibility, transparency and ‘tainted’ currency

Having spent the last decade or more forcing anonymous “physical cash” out of the system, requiring the reporting of transactions over a measly few hundred bucks, can you imagine the brouhaha should Satoshi’s original vision of an “anonymous cash system” actually proliferate?

If you want to know the answer to that, just look at what happened when Mark Zuckerberg had the temerity to suggest such a notion through his Diem (formerly Libra) stablecoin project that might have ended up in the hands of three billion users overnight ― and Diem has (what should be a regulator’s dream) a digital identity hard-baked into the protocol by design from the very beginning!

Related: Stablecoins present new dilemmas for regulators as mass adoption looms

Sometimes these guys really can’t see the wood for the trees.

There has already been an endless debate over the recent years regarding Bitcoin’s (or other crypto’s) fungibility given how they may become “tainted” if or when traced to nefarious use. Transparency of blockchains has proven to be a useful tool not otherwise at their disposal to law enforcement agencies, whilst hackers have mostly found it far from easy to convert their swag back into “useful” fiat as exchanges blacklist their visible wallet address trails.

But surely “money” itself can’t be “clean” or “dirty”, “good” or “bad”? Surely it’s just a dumb object (or database, or “block” entry)? Surely it’s only the identity of a transacting party that can be deemed (albeit subjectively) good or bad? Not that this is remotely a novel debate. You can go back to an 18th Century British legal case to find it’s all been argued over (and rectified) a long, long time ago.

Leaving aside Zuck’s true intentions for Diem, thankfully I’ve not been alone in my long-held opinion on the role that decentralized identity (DID) might play in both our crypto and non-crypto futures.

Related: Decentralized identity is the way to fighting data and privacy theft

Self Sovereign Identity and the tech giants

For all the excitement on crypto Twitter from even a whisper of interest in Bitcoin from any well-known tech brand, the fact that boring old Microsoft started exploring digital identity as its chosen use-case for “blockchain” as far back as 2017 has garnered relatively little attention.

Not that others within the crypto industry weren’t equally cognizant that this would become a critical piece of infrastructure. Projects such as Civic (2017) and GlobalID (2016) are already a good few years in development and the topic of Self Sovereign Identity, whereby the individual — not a gargantuan central database — maintains private control of their identity and decides for themselves who to share them with rather than a tech conglomerate, is back high on the agenda.

With data protection becoming such an issue for regulators and a challenge for the majority of firms with an online user base, you’d have thought that these ideas would be embraced by regulators and companies alike.

And maybe, just maybe, regulators will join our side if the crypto industry proves that it can build safer and more robust systems. Those systems need to satisfy regulatory requirements for identifying transacting parties in a peer-to-peer payment — and by doing so, enable more institutional participants to safely enter the crypto markets with their compliance officers able to sleep at night.

It is, after all, the Googles and Facebooks that have most to lose should decentralized digital identity prevail. Without our data to pimp, they’re royally screwed.

Related: The data economy is a dystopian nightmare

Murmurings of dissent are already being heard relating to the responses to the current World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Call for Review regarding Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0.

Will the turkeys willfully vote for Christmas or will they ultimately have to find a way to live with the inevitable in the same way that the major telcos had to in the 90s when they were up in arms at the idea that VOIP-utilising upstarts such as Skype might get away with enabling free telephony for everyone?

My hunch is that the masses, once armed with the right tools, will eventually win out but one thing is for sure: The battle lines have been drawn. So grab the popcorn and sit back. This fight is just beginning and has a good few years to run but, when it’s over, crypto nerds everywhere might finally see the global adoption they dream of.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Paul Gordon is the founder of Coinscrum, one of the world’s first Bitcoin Meetup groups in 2012, with over 250 events organized and over 6,500 members. Paul has been a derivatives trader/broker for over 20 years.

Could solo mining beat corporate Bitcoin miners?