1. Home
  2. insurance

insurance

Homeowner lawsuit over $170K crypto theft rejected on appeal  

A United States appeals court said a district court was right to toss Ali Sedaghatpour’s lawsuit claiming that his insurer, Lemonade Insurance, should cover him for a crypto scam loss.

A homeowner’s attempt to sue his insurer for failing to cover his $170,000 loss to a crypto scam was rejected by a United States appeals court, with a three-judge panel ruling there had been no error in dismissing his case. 

The Fourth Circuit Appeals Court ruled on Oct. 24 that a Virginia District Court judge was correct in ruling that Ali Sedaghatpour had no breach of contract claim against Lemonade Insurance because his homeowner’s policy only covered “direct physical loss” of property.

Sedaghatpour sued Lemonade Insurance in 2022, claiming the insurer should have covered him under the policy for $170,000 in crypto stolen from him in a scam.

Read more

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Boerse Stuttgart Unveils Insured Ethereum Staking on Bison Platform

Boerse Stuttgart Unveils Insured Ethereum Staking on Bison PlatformEuropean exchange group Boerse Stuttgart has announced a major step into Ethereum staking, offering users a secure, insured way to earn passive income through its Bison trading platform. By partnering with top German firms, Bison enables staking for as little as 0.005 ETH with weekly rewards. The service, currently only in Germany, promises annual returns […]

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

What is cryptocurrency insurance, and how does it work?

Learn how cryptocurrency insurance protects your digital assets from theft, hacks and other risks. Understand the coverage options and how this specialized insurance works.

Cryptocurrency insurance acts as a safety net for various stakeholders in the digital asset market, including individuals, companies and institutional investors.

The purpose of cryptocurrency insurance, also known as digital asset insurance or crypto coverage, is to reduce the risks involved in trading, storing or possessing cryptocurrencies and other digital assets. 

Read more

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Sam Altman-linked Meanwhile Advisors creates BTC private credit fund

The closed fund will offer investors a 5% yield in Bitcoin and lend funds in BTC to institutions.

Bitcoin life insurance innovator Meanwhile Group has come out with a private credit fund denominated in Bitcoin (BTC). The closed fund will offer investors a “conservative” yield in Bitcoin and lend funds in BTC to institutional counterparties at the managers' discretion. 

Meanwhile Advisors are targeting a 5% yield on the Meanwhile BTC Private Credit Fund term. By vetting loan recipients, the fund “effectively mitigates” the risk associated with retail platforms that provide loans predominantly to individuals, the company said in a statement.

Related: Coinbase launches crypto lending platform for US institutions

Read more

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Why the service industry needs blockchain, explained

The service industry needs blockchain for enhanced security, transparency and efficiency in managing transactions, contracts and customer data.

The need for blockchain technology in the service industry

Blockchain technology has the potential to completely transform the services sector by improving efficiency, security and transparency. 

Blockchain technology reduces the risk of fraud and errors in industries, including supply chain management, healthcare, and media and entertainment, by ensuring tamper-proof record-keeping through decentralized ledgers. 

Blockchain-based smart contracts, or self-executing contracts, automate work and lessen the need for intermediaries to manage legal and real estate services operations. Additionally, blockchain enables safe and quick transactions in the hospitality industry, facilitating easy international payments and loyalty program administration.

Moreover, blockchain improves data security in customer care, protecting the privacy and confidence of customers. Additionally, it helps with supply chain traceability, which is essential for confirming the legitimacy of goods in sectors like food and medicine. Blockchain lowers costs by doing away with the need for intermediaries, giving customers access to more economical services.

How can blockchain revolutionize retail transactions?

Blockchain technology improves trust, lowers expenses, and opens up new and creative alternatives for both customers and retailers.

One way it achieves this is by enabling secure and decentralized payment systems. For example, peer-to-peer transactions are made possible by cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), which use blockchain technology to eliminate the need for intermediaries like banks. This improves the consumer experience by lowering transaction fees and expediting the payment process.

Additionally, blockchain enhances retail supply chain management. Retailers can track a product’s route from manufacturer to customer with clear, tamper-proof ledgers. By guaranteeing product authenticity, this transparency lowers the possibility of fake items entering the market. For instance, IBM’s Food Trust Network uses blockchain technology to track the provenance of food products, giving consumers and retailers confidence in the legitimacy and caliber of goods shown on store shelves.

Retailers can also utilize nonfungible tokens (NFTs) that represent unique retail items, like limited edition products or digital assets, ensuring authenticity and provenance. This uniqueness appeals to collectors and enthusiasts, creating new revenue streams for retailers.

Furthermore, loyalty programs built on blockchain technology might encourage client involvement. To promote customer loyalty and maintain the security and integrity of reward programs, retailers can issue tokens on a blockchain that consumers can accumulate and redeem at different stores. 

The role of blockchain in health records management

Blockchain technology plays a pivotal role in health records management by ensuring secure, interoperable and tamper-proof storage of sensitive patient information.

Patient records in the healthcare industry are frequently dispersed among several systems and providers, which compromises data integrity and causes inefficiencies. By implementing a decentralized, unchangeable ledger where patient records are safely kept and unifiedly accessible, blockchain solves these issues.

For instance, people can be in charge of their medical records via MedRec, a blockchain-based platform that gives healthcare providers access to them when needed. Additionally, Estonia’s e-Health Authority implemented blockchain technology to safeguard medical records, guaranteeing that patient information is shielded from alteration and illegal access. This facilitates the exchange of medical information among experts, improving patient care and diagnosis accuracy while also enhancing data security and privacy.

Furthermore, patient records can be uniquely tokenized using NFTs, improving their integrity and thwarting tampering. Guaranteeing the confidentiality and legitimacy of medical data helps build confidence between patients and healthcare professionals.

How does blockchain enhance efficiency and reduce costs in the hospitality industry?

Blockchain technology enhances efficiency and reduces costs in the hospitality industry through various applications that streamline operations and improve customer experiences. 

Cryptocurrencies built on blockchain technology allow for quick and safe cross-border transactions; they eliminate the need for currency conversions and the transaction costs connected with using traditional banking systems. This simplified payment process lowers expenses for both customers and businesses while accelerating transaction speeds.

Blockchain also improves hotel reservations by doing away with intermediaries. By using blockchain-based platforms like LockTrip, hotels are able to list their rooms directly to consumers, negating the need for intermediary booking websites. Hotels can maximize earnings while providing clients with lower pricing by eliminating intermediaries. In addition to lowering commission expenses, this direct communication between hotels and visitors also promotes a more open and competitive pricing environment.

Furthermore, blockchain technology can be advantageous to hotel loyalty programs. Through blockchain technology, hotels may create digital tokens that can be tracked and securely establish reward programs. The simplicity of managing these tokens lowers the administrative burden and guarantees the integrity of loyalty programs.

Blockchain applications in legal and real estate transactions

By providing a secure and transparent framework, blockchain technology streamlines legal and real estate transactions, instilling trust among parties involved and paving the way for a more efficient and reliable future in these sectors.

Blockchain prevents fraud and tampering in the legal realm by using cryptographic hashes to guarantee the integrity of contracts and legal documents. Encoded in the blockchain, smart contracts are self-executing agreements that automate the performance of contractual obligations, eliminating the need for intermediaries and minimizing disputes.

Blockchain makes real estate transactions more transparent by keeping track of ownership information, past transactions and legal papers in a decentralized ledger. This unchangeable record guarantees the validity of property titles, lowering the possibility of real estate fraud. Furthermore, blockchain-enabled platforms streamline the process of buying real estate by reducing paperwork and administrative expenses and enabling speedier and securer transactions.

Through a process known as tokenization, real estate assets can be tokenized to allow for the division of properties into smaller, exchangeable parts. This allows tokens to be bought, sold and traded on blockchain-based platforms by investors.

This approach provides liquidity to traditionally illiquid assets, allowing for more efficient and diverse investment opportunities in the real estate market. Additionally, by enabling developers to sell tokens that reflect future revenue or ownership holdings in the project, it streamlines the fundraising process for real estate development projects.

How does blockchain technology impact and improve the media and entertainment industry?

By guaranteeing transparency, equitable pay and content security, blockchain technology transforms the media and entertainment industries.

Direct transactions between customers and artists are made possible by smart contracts, which remove the need for intermediaries and guarantee that artists are paid fairly and promptly.

Furthermore, by giving content creators the opportunity to directly monetize their work, decentralized platforms promote a more just economy. The immutability offered by blockchain technology improves copyright protection by discouraging piracy and guaranteeing that creators maintain ownership of their creations.

Additionally, it makes royalty distribution public, removing disparities and guaranteeing just compensation for all parties involved. Tokenization democratizes investment opportunities by enabling partial ownership of media assets. 

Digital rights management based on blockchain also guarantees safe and traceable content distribution. This technology empowers the industry to create a more effective, equitable and safe environment by empowering artists, creators and customers equally.

Blockchain implementation challenges in the service industry

Integrating blockchain into existing service industry infrastructure poses challenges due to diverse platforms, data privacy concerns and interoperability issues.

The difficulty of integrating blockchain with existing infrastructure and processes is a significant obstacle. Because service providers frequently use a variety of platforms and technologies, achieving seamless integration can be difficult. It might be difficult to protect data security and privacy while still adhering to regulations.

Blockchain’s transparency conflicts with the requirement to protect sensitive customer information, necessitating careful design and implementation of privacy measures. Another major challenge is establishing communication and data exchange across various blockchain networks and traditional systems. To facilitate seamless interoperability, service providers need to spend time developing standardized protocols, which can be expensive and time-consuming.

Moreover, there are scalability concerns. Blockchain networks, especially public ones, may face limitations in handling a high volume of transactions efficiently. Delays and higher expenses may result from this, especially in service industries where several quick transactions are necessary.

Finally, it’s critical to inform staff members and stakeholders about blockchain technology and its possible uses. Careful planning, teamwork and continual adaptability to the fast-changing blockchain landscape are required to overcome these obstacles.

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Sam Bankman-Fried sues insurance company for defense costs as trial opens

SBF has directors and officers coverage through FTX Trading parent Paper Bird, but now that two companies have paid out $10 million, the third in line is balking, the suit claims.

As the final preparations for the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried were underway in Manhattan, attorneys for the embattled former FTX CEO were filing a suit against the Continental Casualty insurance company in the District Court of Northern California. That company has allegedly provided Paper Bird and its subsidiary FTX Trading directors and officers (D&O) insurance. The suit was filed by Bankman-Fried as an individual.

The suit claimed that Continental Casualty is the provider of Paper Bird’s “second-layer excess policy in the D&O insurance tower.” D&O insurance protects the directors and officers of a company from personal losses in the event of a suit against them. Such coverage can be organized into a metaphorical tower of policies, where a policy on a given layer comes into force when the policy below it reaches its limit.

According to the suit, the primary layer of D&O coverage provided $10 million for Bankman-Fried's defense from two insurers, and Continental Casualty’s policy was intended to provide $5 million. The policy mandated that payments be made on a current basis. It covered the cost of defense against criminal charges, even though there was an exclusion for “fraudulent, criminal, and similar acts.” There was no clawback provision in the policy.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried is paying for legal defense using previously gifted funds from Alameda: Report

The suit noted that Paper Bird’s two primary D&O policy providers, Beazley and QBE, paid his defense costs according to the terms of the policy. Bankman-Fried is demanding that Continental Casualty pay his defense costs according to its contractual obligation, along with damages, including court costs.

Sam Bankman-Fried's complaint against Continental Casualty. Source: CourtListener

The third layer of Paper Bird’s D&O tower, provided by Hiscox Syndicates, is the subject of court action as well. Hiscox has filed a Complaint for Interpleader against Paper Bird and a long list of insured persons, including Bankman-Fried. An interpleader action compels the parties in a legal procedure to litigate their claims among themselves.

According to that complaint, filed on Aug. 9 in the District Court of Northern California, the Hiscox policy comes into force after the $15 million in underlying coverage. The complaint stated that Hiscox expected claims to be made under its policy for $5 million in coverage, and the interpleading was necessary to ensure fair disbursement of policy funds.

Twenty individuals were named in the Hiscox complaint. They were all described as having connections to FTX, sometimes by title (head of a department).

According to The Financial Times, Paper Bird was the full owner of FTX Ventures and owned 89% of FTX Trading. The newspaper described FTX Trading as “the foundation company identified in FTX’s legal disclaimers.” Paper Bird was wholly owned by Bankman-Fried.

Bankman-Fried sought to collect D&O insurance payments under a policy issued to West Realm Shires, which is more commonly referred to as FTX US. That effort was opposed by FTX lawyers and the creditors’ committee and blocked by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

Magazine: US and China try to crush Binance, SBF’s $40M bribe claim: Asia Express

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Evertas expands crypto insurance offerings to include mining and raises limits

Crypto insurance underwriter Evertas will increase coverage limits to $420 million per policy while adding additional mining coverage.

Evertas, an insurance company focused on digital assets, recently announced an increase in coverage limits and the addition of mining operations to its coverage portfolio.

The insurer’s per-policy coverage limits on custodial crypto assets will increase to $420 million, “nearly tripling the amount of risk transfer previously available to blockchain focused projects," according to an announcement.

It’s also adding coverage for mining operations in the amount of up to $200 million per policy. According to Evertas, these are the highest coverage limits available.

Related: Turns out, it’s pretty difficult to insure crypto users and platforms

The policy expansions come just six months after the company raised $14 million in a Series A funding round led by Polychain Capital. Reportedly, this brings the firm’s total outside funding to $19.8 million when accounting for its initial seed funding of $5.8 million.

Evertas, a Chicago-based company, is one of only a handful of insurers focused on cryptocurrency and digital assets and, reportedly, the only given official cover holder status by Lloyd’s of London.

While most cryptocurrency exchanges cover losses to some degree, there are numerous situations where account holders could lose access to their assets that can’t be tracked through account or on-chain activity.

Per an article on Investopedia:

“Exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase claim to insure the digital funds of investors who are victims of theft. But that won’t help you if you’re forced to give up your passwords and credentials in an extortion scheme.”

The same article mentions that many insurers don’t provide comprehensive coverage, thus forcing customers to mix and match policies. 

According to Evertas, its new policy limits are meant to ease this consumer pain point. The firm’s announcement says its policies now provide greater scalability and speed, making it “now possible to get a full, high-limit underwriting from a single source.”

The cryptocurrency insurance space is relatively new when compared to more traditional sectors such as home and life insurance. According to experts, less than 1% of all cryptocurrency assets are insured through traditionally underwritten policies. This represents a significant amount of exposure, especially when considering the global cryptocurrency market is expected to grow significantly by 2030

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Chinese State-Owned Company Launches 2 Crypto Funds in Hong Kong

Chinese State-Owned Company Launches 2 Crypto Funds in Hong KongOne of China’s leading insurers has backed the establishment of two crypto investment funds in Hong Kong. The business move comes against the backdrop of the region’s ambitions to become a hub for digital assets, and despite the negative regulatory attitude towards the market in the mainland. Chinese Insurance Giant Enters Crypto Space Through Hong […]

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

Former FTX CEO Seeks $10M Insurance Fund for Legal Defense, Request Opposed by FTX Debtors and Unsecured Creditors

Former FTX CEO Seeks M Insurance Fund for Legal Defense, Request Opposed by FTX Debtors and Unsecured CreditorsCourt filings reveal that the FTX co-founder is seeking access to a $10 million insurance plan to cover his attorney fees. FTX debtors and unsecured creditors have opposed Sam Bankman-Fried’s request, arguing that every dollar spent on his defense is “one less dollar” available to cover the losses of the debtors. FTX Debtors and Unsecured […]

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report

FDIC plans to return $4B in Signature crypto deposits ‘by early next week’ — Martin Gruenberg

The Treasury Department's Under Secretary for Domestic Finance Nellie Liang said at the same hearing she didn’t believe crypto “played a direct role” in the failure of the banks.

Martin Gruenberg, chair of the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, has said the FDIC plans to return roughly $4 billion in deposits connected to Signature Bank’s digital asset banking business by early April.

In a March 29 hearing of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee exploring federal regulators' responses to recent bank failures, Gruenberg said the deposits that were not included in the bid from a New York Community Bancorp subsidiary for Signature would be returned “by early next week” — roughly $4 billion tied to digital assets. Reports had suggested that the FDIC would close all crypto-related accounts not part of the NYCB deal by April 5 if depositors didn’t move their funds.

FDIC chair Martin Gruenberg speaking at a March 29 hearing of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee

According to Gruenberg, Signature’s payments platform Signet — which, along with the digital asset deposits, was not included in the NYCB bid — was “in the process now of being marketed” to potential buyers. The FDIC, along with New York financial regulators, closed the crypto-friendly bank on March 12, citing risks to the U.S. economy after Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate Bank had failed.

Nellie Liang, Under Secretary for Domestic Finance at the U.S. Treasury Department, said she didn’t believe crypto “played a direct role” in the failure of either Signature or Silicon Valley Bank:

“I know that Signature had activities involved in digital assets, but I don’t believe that is the main [cause].”

The March 29 hearing marked the second time Liang, Gruenberg, and Fed vice chairman for supervision Michael Barr addressed lawmakers following the collapse of three major banks in the United States. The Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on March 28, in which Gruenberg said Silvergate Bank had not adequately managed risks that led to its failure.

Related: US exploring ways to guarantee the country’s 18T of bank deposits: Report

Though some lawmakers and regulators have seemingly pointed to the banks’ ties to digital asset companies, many have criticized the association as being without merit. Former House of Representatives member and Signature board member Barney Frank reportedly said officials wanted to send a “very strong anti-crypto message,” claiming that the bank had no issues with solvency at the time of its closure.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Web3 Cyber Threats Surge in 2024: Cyvers Report