1. Home
  2. Interlocutory Appeal

Interlocutory Appeal

Coinbase, SEC spar over investment definition in appeal attempt

The SEC is evading the real issue, and the court was wrong to take its side, Coinbase claims in a defense of its interlocutory appeal.

Coinbase has leaned heavily into case law in its latest volley against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has come to a rare conclusion: "the SEC seeks to side-step the [Howey] test.” 

Coinbase filed a memorandum in support of its interlocutory appeal—an appeal against a single ruling in an ongoing case—on May 24. The document is a response to the SEC’s opposition to its original request for such an appeal. Coinbase filed its interlocutory appeal on April 12 disputing a March 27 ruling that the SEC had shown sufficient grounds to claim the cryptocurrency exchange’s staking program was an unregistered securities offering.

Related: Coinbase Wallet triumph over SEC allegations is a ‘giant win’ for DeFi

Read more

North Korea’s Lazarus Group Exploited Defi Protocol Alex Lab for $4.3 Million, Probe Reveals

Coinbase Seeking To File Interlocutory Appeal in SEC Lawsuit on ‘Investment Contract’ Definition

Coinbase Seeking To File Interlocutory Appeal in SEC Lawsuit on ‘Investment Contract’ Definition

Top US crypto exchange Coinbase is looking to file an interlocutory appeal in its lawsuit with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the definition of an “investment contract.” In a new thread, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal says that the crypto exchange is filing an interlocutory appeal because they and the SEC […]

The post Coinbase Seeking To File Interlocutory Appeal in SEC Lawsuit on ‘Investment Contract’ Definition appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

North Korea’s Lazarus Group Exploited Defi Protocol Alex Lab for $4.3 Million, Probe Reveals

Ripple Labs bites back against SEC’s request to file appeal

Ripple’s chief legal officer said no “extraordinary circumstance” in the case exists which warrants the Court to accept the SEC’s request for leave.

Ripple Labs has voiced its opposition towards the United States securities regulator’s move towards filing an interlocutory appeal relating to the summary judgment laid down by U.S. District Court Analisa Torres on Jul. 13.

In an Aug. 16 letter to Torres of the Southern District of New York, Ripple’s lawyers explained that because the Securities and Exchange Commission failed to satisfy elements of the Howey test relating to Ripple’s distribution of XRP — a “legal question” — the Court should reject the SEC’s motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal.

An interlocutory appeal occurs when a ruling by a trial court is appealed while other aspects of the case are still proceeding and are only allowed under specific circumstances.

Ripple’s lawyers believe it is more appropriate for the SEC to appeal the Court’s ruling after a final judgement with a full record.

Ripple Labs officially opposes the SEC’s move to file an appeal in a letter to U.S. Judge Analisa Torres. Source: Court Listener

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s chief legal officer, explained that no “extraordinary circumstance” exists in the matter that warrants the Court to depart from normal legal procedure:

“There is no extraordinary circumstance here that would justify departing from the rule requiring all issues as to all parties to be resolved before an appeal.”

Related: SEC v. Ripple: Judge greenlights investment banker declarant’s entry

On Jul. 13, Ripple scored a partial victory over the securities regulator regarding the securities status of XRP.

Torres ruled that the XRP token was not in itself a security. She said, however, that sales of XRP tokens can be securities in certain circumstances, such as when sold to institutional investors but not when sold on exchanges to retail traders.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

North Korea’s Lazarus Group Exploited Defi Protocol Alex Lab for $4.3 Million, Probe Reveals