1. Home
  2. loans

loans

DCG settlement with Genesis still undecided as 30-day mediation period proceeds

The settlement plan proposed in February would give Genesis creditors 80% recovery of funds but many raised demands, leading to the mediation.

Digital Currency Group (DCG), the parent company of crypto firm Genesis Capital, has reported no solution to its “outstanding intercompany obligations” that could help reimburse creditors.

In a May 9 announcement, DCG said it was in the middle of a 30-day mediation period with Genesis in response to creditor demands. The firm proposed a settlement plan in February in which Genesis creditors had been expected to receive 80% recovery of funds after the firm filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 

However, in April Genesis creditors raised their demands, disrupting the bankruptcy proceedings and the “agreement in principle” between the two firms. Genesis reported it had between $1 billion and $10 billion in liabilities when filing for bankruptcy.

“On a parallel path and to provide further financial flexibility, DCG is in discussions with capital providers for growth capital and to refinance its outstanding intercompany obligations with Genesis,” said DCG. “We are committed to reaching a fair outcome for all and look forward to a productive resolution during this mediation period.”

In the wake of Genesis’ bankruptcy, the troubled crypto firm has often been at the center of legal issues between DCG and crypto exchange Gemini. DCG and Genesis reportedly owed roughly $900 million to Gemini’s clients locked out of their Earn funds — Genesis operated the program in partnership with Gemini. In January, Gemini co-founder Cameron Winklevoss threatened to file a lawsuit against DCG and CEO Barry Silbert if they couldn’t offer Gemini creditors “a fair deal."

Related: Gemini ‘supportive’ of Genesis mediation, but frustrated over pacing

U.S. authorities have also taken action amid the businesses’ financial troubles. In January, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Genesis and Gemini with offering unregistered securities, and the New York State Department of Financial Services was also reportedly investigating Gemini over its Earn program.

The 30-day meditation period gives DCG and Genesis until the end of May to come to resolution on the proposed restructuring plan. In its initial Chapter 11 filing, Genesis said it planned to sell its assets at auction and exit bankruptcy on May 19.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Coinbase to cease issuing new Bitcoin-backed loans via Borrow service

The service allows users to borrow up to $1 million with no credit check, provided they post Bitcoin as collateral.

Crypto exchange Coinbase is stopping the issuance of new loans through its Borrow service — a product that allows certain United States customers to post crypto as collateral to receive a cash loan.

In an email sent to Coinbase Borrow customers on May 3 which was shared by recipients on Twitter, the exchange said — without providing a reason — that from May 10 customers won’t be able to take out new loans with Coinbase Borrow.

It added there would be no impact on outstanding loans and customers did not need to take any further action.

A screenshot of the email sent to Coinbase customers advising that new Borrow loans would end on May 10. Source: Twitter

Coinbase has not publicly addressed why it closed Borrow. A Coinbase spokesperson told Cointelegraph:

"We regularly evaluate our products to ensure we’re prioritizing the offerings that our customers care about most.”

The service allows users to borrow from the exchange against up to 40% of their Bitcoin (BTC) holdings, with a $1 million limit. It requires no credit check and users pay a nearly 9% annual percentage rate for the service.

The announcement is in the backdrop of a regulatory scuffle between Coinbase and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which sent the exchange a Wells notice in March, which the exchange said was in relation to “possible violations of securities laws.”

Related: Coinbase officers, board members face suit over alleged insider trading during listing

The email to users also proceed its first quarter results announcement, which is expected on May 4.

Investment analysts from Citi downgraded Coinbase shares from “buy” to “neutral” ahead of the exchanges Q1 earnings. Analyts from Mizuho also reportedly maintained its “underperform” rating on Coinbase saying its “fundamentals remain weak” citing lower average daily trading volumes.

Earlier this week, amid seeming crackdown on crypto firms in the U.S., Coinbase decided to take its exchange global, launching the Coinbase International Exchange (CIE) derivatives trading platform on May 2.

Magazine: Whatever happened to EOS? Community shoots for unlikely comeback

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Winklevoss twins infuse Gemini with $100M personal loan: Report

The cash infusion reportedly followed Gemini attempting to get funding from outside investors without success.

Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, co-founders of the United States-based cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, have reportedly dipped into their own pockets to fund the business amid the crypto market downturn.

According to an April 10 Bloomberg report, the Winklevoss twins made a personal $100-million loan to Gemini following attempts to get funding from outside investors. Cointelegraph reached out to Gemini for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

The reported loan came amid regulators scrutinizing Gemini’s activities. In January, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Gemini — as well as Genesis Global Capital and crypto exchange — with offering unregistered securities through the exchange’s Earn program. New York’s Department of Financial Services also reportedly began investigating the exchange following reports many Gemini users claimed assets in their Earn accounts had been afforded FDIC protection.

Related: Gemini and Genesis’ legal troubles stand to shake up industry further

Following the announcement of the charges, Tyler Winklevoss accused the SEC of issuing a “manufactured parking ticket,” claiming Gemini staff had been in talks with the regulator for more than a year prior to its enforcement action. The complaint echoed that of crypto exchange Coinbase, whose chief legal officer said personnel met with SEC representatives “more than 30 times over nine months” but still received a Wells notice.

Magazine: SBF denies stealing FTX assets, SEC charges Gemini and Genesis, and more

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

BlockFi to provide over $100K in refunds to California clients

At least 111 BlockFi borrowers had continued repaying loans between Nov. 11 and Nov. 22, even though they didn't need to, according to court documents.

Bankrupt crypto lender BlockFi has agreed to refund more than $100,000 to California customers that had continued to repay loans even after a trading halt on Nov. 10 last year. 

According to a March 27 statement from California's financial watchdog, the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), its investigation discovered at least 111 borrowers in California paid back roughly $103,471 in loan repayments between Nov. 11 and Nov. 22.

The regulator claimed that BlockFi failed to "provide timely notification to borrowers that they could stop repaying their BlockFi loans."

The DFPI claims that borrowers were not notified until Nov. 22 that they could stop repaying their BlockFi Loans "until further notice."

According to documents, BlockFi requested permission from the bankruptcy court to return these payments to the borrowers in a motion filed with the court on Feb. 24, 2023.

The refunds will be able to go ahead if the motion is approved, with a hearing scheduled for April 19.

Excerpt from the DFPI agreement filed in court. Source: DFPI

Meanwhile, the DFPI said BlockFi has agreed to an "interim suspension" of its California Financing Law (CFL) license while "the bankruptcy and revocation actions are pending."

"If this motion is granted BlockFi agrees to direct the Servicer to timely return borrowers' payments, including interest and late fees and all funds paid following the November 10th platform pause," according to the DFPI documents. 

Unless otherwise ruled by the bankruptcy court, the regulator said BlockFi's agreement to the interim suspension means it will continue to direct its agents to pause the collection of repayments for California customers on loans, interest payments and "not charge, levy, or assess any late fees associated with any payments, including at maturity."

BlockFi has also agreed to continue not reporting to credit agencies that loans from California residents have become delinquent or defaulted on or after Nov. 11, 2022, and will not take “any action that may harm California residents’ credit scores on such loans.”

Related: BlockFi in no immediate danger, despite Silicon Valley Bank exposure: Report

According to the DFPI, Commissioner Clothilde V. Hewlett previously suspended BlockFi's lending license for 30 days beginning on Nov. 11, 2022 and moved to revoke BlockFi's CFL license on Dec. 15, 2022.

BlockFi halted client withdrawals and requested clients not to deposit to BlockFi wallets or Interest Accounts on Nov. 10, citing a lack of clarity around the FTX collapse.

By Nov. 28, BlockFi filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the company and its eight subsidiaries. BlockFi International filed for bankruptcy with the Supreme Court of Bermuda on the same day.

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

First Citizens Bank Acquires Silicon Valley Bank, Costing FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund an Estimated $20B

First Citizens Bank Acquires Silicon Valley Bank, Costing FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund an Estimated BAccording to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the troubled bank Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was acquired by First Citizens Bank & Trust Company, which is based in Raleigh, North Carolina. First Citizens acquired all deposits and loans from SVB, as well as the 17 branches that SVB owned across the United States. Silicon Valley […]

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

NFT investor accidentally burns $135k CryptoPunk trying to borrow money

While going through the unfamiliar process of wrapping NFTs, Riley accidentally sent the asset to a burn address, permanently deleting the NFT from circulation.

A nonfungible token (NFT) from the CryptoPunks collection worth 77 Ether (ETH) was sent to a burn address to be permanently destroyed. However, the collector’s intent was just to borrow some money against it to buy another NFT.

NFT collector Brandon Riley added CryptoPunk #685 to his collection on March 13 by paying 77 ETH, hoping to hold it for the long term.

As a seasoned investor, Riley knew the importance of procuring new NFTs right before crypto markets took off into a new bull market. As a result, he decided to borrow some money against CryptoPunk #685 by using a popular technique known as wrapping.

While going through the unfamiliar process of wrapping NFTs, Riley accidentally sent the asset to a burn address — which permanently deleted the NFT from circulation, as shown below.

Trading history of CryptoPunk $#685. Source: dappradar.com

“I was told to follow the directions exactly, so I did,” explained Riley, but in the process, he ended up losing 77 ETH, which was worth $135,372.16. He explained:

“I was not wrapping this punk to sell it on Blur. It was to be my “forever punk.” The number is exact reverse of my ape. I was only wrapping it because I needed to borrow some liquidity from it.”

While members of Crypto Twitter believed that the NFT collector must have had “deep pockets,” Riley contradicted the rumors by revealing that he had purchased CryptoPunk #685 through borrowed money.

“I just shouldn’t have attempted this on my own I guess,” was Riley’s takeaway from the conundrum. On the other hand, Crypto Twitter also blamed confusing user interfaces and complex instructions for the investor’s loss. As a result, the community unanimously agreed on the need to revamp the front-end processes for crypto ecosystems.

Related: Improving Bitcoin NFT marketplace infrastructure sets the stage for ecosystem growth

NFT wash trading increased by 126% in February, confirmed a CoinGecko report. The top six NFT marketplaces — Magic Eden, OpenSea, Blur, X2Y2, CryptoPunks and LooksRare. X2Y2, Blur and LooksRare — saw a rise in wash trading for the fourth straight month, with a total volume of $580 million.

NFT wash trading volume, January 2022–February 2023. Source: CoinGecko, Footprint Analytics

As Cointelegraph previously reported, the issue of wash trading stems from a lack of clear regulations.

Magazine: 4 out of 10 NFT sales are fake: Learn to spot the signs of wash trading

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Australian Banking Association’s cost of living inquiry reveals bank pressure

An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds.

The trade association for the Australian banking industry — Australian Banking Association (ABA) — launched a cost of living inquiry to closely study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, global supply chain constraints and geopolitical tensions, among others, on Australians.

An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of three major traditional banks — Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — recently proved that more than 186 banks in the US are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds. ABA’s inquiry aims to identify ways to ease the cost of living in Australia and the Government’s fiscal policy response.

Consumer price index, percentage change from corresponding quarter in previous year, December 2012 – December 2022. Source: ausbanking.org.au

ABA acknowledged that many Australians would struggle to adjust to a higher cost of living, while it may be easier for some, adding that:

“The ABA notes most customers will manage the higher cost of living and their mortgage commitments by changing their spending patterns, applying their accumulated savings to their higher repayments in anticipation of higher borrowing rates, or refinancing their mortgage.”

One of the biggest pressures for banks was when citizens rolled over from a fixed-rate mortgage to a variable rate. However, ABA urged customers to be proactive and ensure they are getting the best deal for their banking services.

Household savings ratio, December 2014 – December 2022. Source: ausbanking.org.au

Property rent across Australia has also witnessed a steady increase as markets normalized following the end of COVID-19 restrictions. Citizens experiencing financial difficulty can contact their banks and get help, including fees and charges waivers, emergency credit limit increases and deferral of scheduled loan repayments, to name a few.

Related: National Australia Bank makes first-ever cross-border stablecoin transaction

Alongside this attempt to cushion Australians against rising fiat inflation, the Reserve Bank of Australia and Treasury have been holding private meetings with executives from Coinbase, with discussions revolving around the future of crypto regulation in Australia.

Cointelegraph confirmed from an RBA spokesperson that Coinbase met with the RBA’s Payments Policy and Financial Stability departments in mid-March “as part of the Bank’s ongoing liaison with industry.”

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Yield platform Stablegains sued for promoting UST: Finance Redefined

DeFi market saw another exploit this past week on the Platypus protocol, resulting in a loss of over $8 million.

Welcome to Finance Redefined, your weekly dose of essential decentralized finance (DeFi) insights — a newsletter crafted to bring you significant developments over the last week.

The backlash from the Terra implosion still haunts the crypto world, with the now-shuttered stablecoin yield platform Stablegains being sued for customer losses. The plaintiffs allege that the platform funnelled customer funds into Anchor Protocol without users’ knowledge or consent.

Platypus, the DeFi protocol that was exploited for over $8 million, is working on a compensation plan to recover some of the funds.

Florida’s Cogent Bank is proposing a $100 million participation in loans to MakerDAO’s RWA Master Participation Trust.

Bridge protocols were the primary target of exploits last year, amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars worth of stolen funds. Trustless bridges can mitigate the issue, enabling cross-chain transfers without needing a centralized custodian, potentially making it a safer option for interoperability.

After nearly four weeks of a bullish run, the DeFi market is fighting a brave battle against the bears. There were minor price drops, and the market’s overall slightly declined as bears had the upper hand toward the end of the week.

Yield platform Stablegains sued for promoting UST as a ‘safe’ investment

DeFi yield platform Stablegains is being sued in a Californian court for allegedly misleading investors and failing to comply with securities laws.

On Feb. 18, the plaintiffs, Alec and Artin Ohanian, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the shuttered DeFi platform diverted all its customer funds to the Anchor Protocol without their knowledge or consent. Anchor Protocol offered up to 20% yields on Terraform Labs’ algorithmic stablecoin, Terra USD (UST).

Continue reading

Platypus to work on compensation plan after $8.5M attack

The $8.5 million Platypus flash loan attack was made possible because of code that was in the wrong order, according to a post-mortem report from Platypus auditor Omniscia. The DeFi firm is working on a compensation plan for users’ losses after a flash loan attack drained nearly $8.5 million from the protocol, affecting its stablecoin dollar peg.

In a tweet on Feb. 18, Platypus said it was working on a plan to compensate for the damages and asked users not to realize their losses in the protocol, saying this would make it harder for the company to manage the issue. Asset liquidations are also paused, the protocol said.

Continue reading

MakerDAO voting on $100M loan participation with Florida commercial bank

Crypto lending platform MakerDAO is voting on a new proposal to bring another commercial bank into its ecosystem, strengthening the connection between DeFi and traditional finance.

As per MakerDAO’s governance forum, Cogent Bank — a Florida-based commercial bank — proposes to participate with $100 million in loans to MakerDAO’s RWA Master Participation Trust.

Continue reading

DeFi security: How trustless bridges can help protect users

Blockchain bridges allow DeFi users to use the same tokens across multiple blockchains. For example, a trader can use USD Coin (USDC) on the Ethereum or Solana blockchains to interact with those networks’ decentralized applications.

While these protocols may be convenient for DeFi users, they are at risk of exploitation by malicious actors. For example, in the past year, the Wormhole bridge — a popular cross-chain crypto bridge between Solana, Ethereum, Avalanche and others — was hacked, with attackers stealing over $321 million worth of wrapped Ethereum (wETH), the largest hack in DeFi history at the time.

Continue reading

DeFi market overview

Analytical data reveals that DeFi’s total market value dipped below $50 billion this past week. Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that DeFi’s top 100 tokens by market capitalization had a mixed week, with most of the tokens trading in green while a few others bled in red.

Thanks for reading our summary of this week’s most impactful DeFi developments. Join us next Friday for more stories, insights and education in this dynamically advancing space.

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Platypus attack exploited incorrect ordering of code, auditor claims

The misordered lines caused a solvency check to be performed before the user’s amount, factor, and rewardDebt had been set to zero

The $8m Platypus flash loan attack was made possible because of code that was in the wrong order, according to a post mortem report from Platypus auditor Omniscia. The auditing company claims the problematic code didn’t exist in the version they saw.

According to the report, the Platypus MasterPlatypusV4 contract “contained a fatal misconception in its emergencyWithdraw mechanism” which made it perform “its solvency check before updating the LP tokens associated with the stake position.”

The report emphasized that the code for the emergencyWithdraw function had all of the necessary elements to prevent an attack, but these elements were simply written in the wrong order, as Omniscia explained:

“The issue could have been prevented by re-ordering the MasterPlatypusV4::emergencyWithdraw statements and performing the solvency check after the user’s amount entry has been set to 0 which would have prohibited the attack from taking place.”

Omnisia admitted that they audited a version of the MasterPlatypusV4 contract from Nov. 21 to Dec. 5, 2021. However, this version “contained no integration points with an external platypusTreasure system” and therefore did not contain the misordered lines of code. From Omniscia’s point of view, this implies that the developers must have deployed a new version of the contract at some point after the audit was made.

Related: Raydium announces details of hack, proposes compensation for victims

The auditor claims that the contract implementation at Avalanche (AVAX) C-Chain address 0xc007f27b757a782c833c568f5851ae1dfe0e6ec7 is the one that was exploited. Lines 582-584 of this contract appear to call a function called “isSolvent” on the PlatypusTreasure contract, and lines 599-601 appear to set the user’s amount, factor, and rewardDebt to zero. However, these amounts are set to zero after the “isSolvent” function has already been called.

The Platypus team confirmed on Feb. 16 that the attacker exploited a “flaw in [the] USP solvency check mechanism,” but the team did not initially provide further detail. This new report from the auditor sheds further light on how the attacker may have been able to accomplish the exploit.

The Platypus team announced on Feb. 16 that the attack had occurred. It has attempted to contact the hacker and get the funds returned in exchange for a bug bounty. The attacker used flashed loans to perform the exploit, which is similar to the strategy used in the Defrost Finance exploit of Dec. 25.

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Analyst Warns of Banks’ Authority to Confiscate Funds, Decline of US Dollar Purchasing Power

Analyst Warns of Banks’ Authority to Confiscate Funds, Decline of US Dollar Purchasing PowerAccording to Lynette Zang, chief market analyst at ITM Trading, U.S. banks have the legal authority to confiscate people’s funds due to legislation passed by Congress. In a recent interview, Zang discussed how the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar has dwindled to “roughly three cents,” her belief that central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will […]

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report