1. Home
  2. manipulation

manipulation

Here’s why bears hope to pin Bitcoin under $60K ahead of Friday’s $1.1B options expiry

Last week, bulls had a $715 million advantage when Bitcoin price was above $68,000, but the current downturn gives bears a chance to turn the tables.

Bitcoin (BTC) bulls were euphoric when the price soared to $69,000 on Nov. 10 because the 14.5% gain accumulated over five days meant they were in for a $715 million profit on Nov. 12's options expiry.

However, the 9% negative price move on Nov. 16 caught bulls by surprise, especially since most of the call (buy) options for Nov. 19 have been placed at $66,000 or higher. Curiously, that price level has been the exception rather than the norm.

Bitcoin/USD price on FTX. Source: TradingView

Bears might have been lucky because the two negative events happened in the past few days. On Nov. 12, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission denied VanEck’s spot Bitcoin ETF request. But more important than the rejection, itself, which was largely expected, was the rationale behind the decision.

The SEC explicitly mentioned their uncertainties about Tether’s (USDT) stablecoin and the lack of ability to deter fraud and market manipulation in Bitcoin trading. Bloomberg senior ETF analyst and cryptocurrency expert Eric Balchunas had already given a 1% chance for approval so the denial wasn’t really a surprise.

Moreover, on Nov. 15, U.S. President Joe Biden sanctioned the infrastructure bill, which mandates that starting in 2024, digital asset transactions worth more than $10,000 be reported to the Internal Revenue Service.

Considering the above scenario, bulls are likely to regret their lack of more conservative bets on Nov. 19’s $1.1-billion weekly options expiry.

Bitcoin options aggregate open interest for Nov. 19. Source: Bybt

At first sight, the $630 million call (buy) options dominate the weekly expiry by 35% compared to the $470 million put (sell) instruments. Still, the 1.35 call-to-put ratio is deceptive because the recent price crash will probably wipe out most bullish bets.

For example, if Bitcoin’s price remains below $62,000 at 8:00 am UTC on Nov. 19, only $68 million worth of those call (buy) options will be available at the expiry. For example, there is no value in the right to buy Bitcoin at $64,000 if it’s trading below that price.

Bears have their eyes set on prices below $60,000

Listed below are the four most likely scenarios for the $1.1-billion Nov. 19 expiry. The imbalance favoring each side represents the theoretical profit. In other words, depending on the expiry price, the quantity of call (buy) and put (sell) contracts becoming active varies:

  • Between $58,000 and $60,000: 10 calls vs. 3,840 puts. The net result is $220 million favoring the put (bear) options.
  • Between $60,000 and $62,000: 910 calls vs. 1,950 puts. The net result is $60 million favoring the put (bear) instruments.
  • Between $62,000 and $64,000: 2,030 calls vs. 940 puts. The net result is $70 million favoring the call (bull) options.
  • Above $64,000: 2,920 calls vs. 240 puts. The net result is $175 million favoring the call (bull) instruments.

This crude estimate considers call options being used in bullish bets and put options exclusively in neutral-to-bearish trades. However, this oversimplification disregards more complex investment strategies.

For instance, a trader could have sold a put option, effectively gaining a positive exposure to Bitcoin (BTC) above a specific price. But, unfortunately, there’s no easy way to estimate this effect.

Bulls need a 6% price hike to turn the tables

The only way for bulls to profit a significant amount on Nov. 19’s expiry is by pushing Bitcoin’s price above $64,000, which is 6% away from the current $60,400. If the current short-term negative sentiment prevails, bears could exert some pressure and try to score up to $220 million in profit if Bitcoin price stays closer to $58,000.

Currently, options markets data slightly favor the put (sell) options, slightly reducing the odds of a rally ahead of Nov. 19.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Natural News Founder Mike Adams Pushes Trump to Pardon Roger Ver on The Alex Jones Show

The Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Case: Long-Awaited Kleiman v. Wright Trial Begins Next Week in Miami

The Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Case: Long-Awaited Kleiman v. Wright Trial Begins Next Week in MiamiOn Monday, November 1, the long-awaited Kleiman v. Wright trial will begin as a federal jury plans to determine the relationship between Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright. The Kleiman estate is asking for $11.4 billion, alongside the return of intellectual property (IP) or its fair market value. While Bitcoinsv proponents and Wright’s fans believe the […]

Natural News Founder Mike Adams Pushes Trump to Pardon Roger Ver on The Alex Jones Show

Opensea NFT Marketplace Claims Employee Profited From Insider Information

Opensea NFT Marketplace Claims Employee Profited From Insider InformationOn September 15, the top non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, Opensea, revealed that an Opensea executive profited from insider trading. “Yesterday we learned that one of our employees purchased items that they knew were set to display on our front page before they appeared there publicly,” Opensea informed the public on Wednesday. Opensea did not name […]

Natural News Founder Mike Adams Pushes Trump to Pardon Roger Ver on The Alex Jones Show

New research claims 21 accounts pumped the $4.4B EOS ICO with wash trades

New research asserts that EOS and ETH were wash-traded on exchanges to manipulate prices during EOS’s multi-billion dollar ICO.

New research has shed more light on the crypto industry’s largest-ever token sale, alleging that foul play may have been afoot during EOS’s initial coin offering (ICO) four years ago.

Researchers from the University of Texas have raised fresh concerns regarding Block.one’s record $4.362 billion ICO for the EOS blockchain in 2017 and 2018. The highly-anticipated project was backed by industry heavyweights including PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel alongside billionaire hedge fund managers Alan Howard and Louis Bacon. The research does not accuse Block.one itself of any wrongdoing and the company has cited a report stating there was no evidence it was involved.

On Aug. 31, Professor John Griffin of the Austin McCombs School of Business and financial analysis firm Integra FEC published their findings in a paper titled “Were ETH and EOS Repeatedly Recycled during the EOS Initial Coin Offering?” — alleging that wash-trading played a key role in EOS’s price discovery. Bloomerbe

According to the paper and outlined in an investigation by Bloomberg, EOS was allegedly wash-traded on the Binance and Bitfinex cryptocurrency exchanges in an effort to artificially inflate the prices. Wash-trading describes the process where an entity simultaneously acts as the buyer and seller at the same asset to artificially bolster volume or manipulate prices.

Griffin wrote that artificial demand from suspect accounts created the illusion of demand for the token and pushed prices up:

“First, it directly manipulated EOS’s offering price upward through the extra buying and inflated the market value of the token. Second, it created the false impression of value of the token which enticed others to want to purchase the ICO token.”

The research allegedly identified 21 accounts that recycled EOS tokens during the ICO. Funds identified as suspect amounted to 1.2 million ETH worth around $815 million at the time. Ether was the sole cryptocurrency used to buy EOS during the year-long ICO.

The analysis claims that Ethereum accounts were created in order to repeatedly purchase EOS over time. It claims that a "significant portion" of the Ether raised during the token sale appears to have been "recycled by transferring the ICO contributions through a series of obfuscating intermediary accounts and finally arriving at Bitfinex."

“2.895 million Ether ($1.721 billion USD), or 39% of the Ether raised in the crowdsale, are also traced from the ICO crowdsale wallet back to Bitfinex.”

Griffin did not identify the owners of the accounts or point the finger toward Block.one regarding the alleged wash-trading, but noted: “These suspicious accounts accounted for almost a quarter of EOS purchases by the end of the crowdsale.”

Professor of law at Cornell Law School, Robert C. Hockett, said that he worked for more than one month on the story alongside media outlet Bloomberg — which published its findings on Sept. 2.

According to Bloomberg, Block.one responded to the paper by referencing a July document authored by law firm Clifford Chance LLP that asserted there was “no evidence that Block.one purchased tokens on the primary market.”

Related: Startup Darling EOS Cashes In Millions Of ETH As ICO Scorn Continues

The same John Griffin published a paper in October 2019 titled “Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered?” that claimed the leading stablecoin Tether (USDT) was wash traded to influence Bitcoin prices during the 2017 bull market. Speaking to Cointelegraph in Feb. 2020, the firm behind Tether, iFinex, labeled the claims “reckless and false.”

Manipulation or otherwise, EOS has largely fallen out of favor with crypto traders and investors. Since ranking among the top five crypto assets by market cap in mid-2018, EOS has since tumbled to rank 35th by capitalization.

The token currently trades for $5, down 77% from its April 2018 all-time high of $22.70.

Natural News Founder Mike Adams Pushes Trump to Pardon Roger Ver on The Alex Jones Show