1. Home
  2. Media

Media

Despite endless media appearances, SBF unlikely to testify on 13th

One observer suggested Bankman-Fried may be reluctant to discuss FTX due to the legal implication of lying under oath to the U.S. Congress.

Former CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, has signaled he's unwilling to testify before the United States Congress until he’s “finished learning and reviewing what happened.”

Bankman-Fried was responding to a Dec. 2 tweet from U.S. Representative Maxine Waters inviting him to testify in a scheduled U.S. House Committee on Financial Services hearing on Dec. 13 to discuss "what happened" at FTX.

In a Dec. 4 response on Twitter, the former FTX CEO said he feels it is his “duty to appear before the committee and explain,” but only once he's “finished learning and reviewing what happened," adding he wasn't “sure” whether it would happen by the 13th. 

Some in the community pointed out the response appears out of line with his recent actions, including taking part in several media interviews and posting endless tweets about what led to the fall of FTX in November.

Blockchain Association Head of Policy and U.S. Attorney Jake Chervinsky suggested to his 120,500 Twitter followers that Bankman-Fried was reluctant to take part in the Dec. 13 hearing because '"lying to Congress under oath is less appealing."

On Nov. 30, Bankman-Fried made his first live public appearance since the collapse of FTX during the New York Times' DealBook Summit where he was questioned over the circumstances behind the crypto exchange's demise. A day later, he appeared in a Good Morning America interview, and also in a Twitter space hosted by IBC Group founder and CEO Mario Nawfal.

Most recently, Bankman-Fried was questioned by Coffeezilla in a Twitter Spaces interview on Dec. 3, which saw him leaving the interview around 20 minutes in. 

Related: Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried denies ‘improper use’ of customer funds

Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has called out Bankman-Fried's purported narrative in recent days, stating on Dec. 3 that “even the most gullible person” should not believe Bankman-Fried's claim that FTX's transfer of billions of dollars of customer funds to its trading firm Alameda Research came from the result of an unintentional “accounting error.”

As for SBF’s recent media antics, Tesla and Twitter CEO Elon Musk “agreed” with a member of the crypto community SBF doesn’t deserve any more media attention until his court date, with Musk adding he needs an “adult timeout.”

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Elon Musk alleges SBF donated over $1B to Democrats: “Where did it go?”

SBF made the “highest ROI trade of all time” by donating $40 million to the right people for getting away with stealing over $10 billion, said Will Manidis, the CEO of ScienceIO.

The attempts of mainstream media to water down the frauds committed by FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) did not fare well in convincing the crypto community and entrepreneurs. Instead, the misinformation campaign collided with Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s drive to position Twitter as "the most accurate source of information."

The world is yet to overcome the shock after witnessing the legal leniency awarded to SBF for misappropriating users’ funds and shady investment practices via trading firms Alameda Research and FTX. Will Manidis, the CEO of ScienceIO, a healthcare data platform, pointed out that SBF made the “highest ROI trade of all time” by donating $40 million to the right people for getting away with stealing over $10 billion.

On the other hand, Musk alleged that SBF donated over $1 billion to Democratic candidates, which is way more than the publicly disclosed amount of $40 million. SBF previously admitted to making backdoor donations to the Democratic Party. Musk asked:

“His actual support of Dem elections is probably over $1B. The money went somewhere, so where did it go?”

The United States House Financial Services Committee chair Maxine Waters, a Democrat, and ranking member Patrick McHenry, a Republican, have requested SBF to appear in an investigative hearing scheduled for Dec. 13.

To this request, prominent entrepreneurs, including Polygon CEO Ryan Wyatt, informed Waters that “he’s (SBF) a criminal” after being shocked at the leniency shown by the people in power to the fugitive.

Related: FTX collapse drives curiosity around Sam Bankman-Fried, Google data shows

The crypto community openly criticizes paid narratives that try to show SBF in good light. The latest backlash is related to SBF’s interviews in New York Times DealBook Summit and Good Morning America interviews.

Speaking to the news outlets during the ‘apology tour,’ SBF portrayed himself as a victim and got applauded at the end. “Watching SBF’s interview is kind of like watching Casey Anthony’s documentary. They’re so mechanical, they’re so inauthentic in their delivery. If you feel any emotion, at all, it slows people down. The way it is expressed is a separate subjective matter,” said Twitter user and developer Naom.

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Crypto Influencer Bitboy Flies to the Bahamas to Question Former FTX Exec Sam Bankman-Fried

Crypto Influencer Bitboy Flies to the Bahamas to Question Former FTX Exec Sam Bankman-FriedIt’s been 16 days since FTX filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. and the former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is allegedly still hunkering down at his seaside resort in the Bahamas. This weekend, the Youtuber known as Bitboy decided to fly down to Nassau in order to question SBF about the […]

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Crypto Twitter unhappy with SBF ‘puff piece’ pushed by mainstream media

While SBF refuses to interact with Crypto Twitter, the same community he once called home, he was featured in New York Times trying to explain the sequence of events that led to the fall of FTX.

When the world realized the fraud Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) committed to building his FTX empire, fellow entrepreneurs, investors and long-time believers unanimously acknowledged the damage caused to the credibility of the crypto ecosystem. On the other hand, mainstream media — that predominantly attacked crypto via negative speculations — has seemingly taken sides with SBF while paying no heed to the losses exceeding billions of dollars incurred by the general public.

While SBF refuses to interact with Crypto Twitter, the same community he once called home, he featured in a New York Times (NYT) article on Nov. 14, trying to explain the sequence of events that led to the fall of the crypto exchange FTX. Surprisingly, the article’s tone did not resonate with the community, as many suspected a bias given SBF’s strong ties with United States politics.

As rightfully pointed out by Bloomberg journalist Trung Phan, the “puff piece on SBF” fails to mention the various frauds and crimes committed by the entrepreneur. Instead, the NYT chose to report an angle no one expected.

Crypto entrepreneurs, including Polygon Studios CEO Ryan Wyatt, angel investor Balaji Srinivasan and billionaire Elon Musk, openly criticized NYT for trying to change the narrative. Pointing out the obvious, Wyatt explained to the NYT author how SBF committed significant financial crimes, adding:

“It’s just a disservice to all of those impacted, and it’s disheartening to see all of this just skimmed over like he made a simple mistake.”

Srinivasan accused the New York Times of covering up the crimes committed by Sam Bankman-Fried. “Nothing SBF says can be trusted. Nothing NYT says can be trusted either,” said Srinivasan while asking Crypto Twitter to mass block the media outlet for spreading disinformation.

The talk of the town, Elon Musk, cemented the above accusations by asking a simple question on his recently-purchased social media platform:

“Why the puff piece @nytimes?”

At a time when entrepreneurs are trying to remediate the destruction caused to the crypto ecosystem, the community keeps a close on mainstream media’s attempt to change the narrative. It is important to note that other mainstream media outlets, such as CNBC, The Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal, have accurately reported on the wrongdoings of SBF.

Related: FTX collapse could see crypto sector layoffs accelerate

In a recent Ask Me Anything (AMA) session conducted on Nov. 14, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao asked investors to take responsibility for their investment decisions instead of purely blaming bad actors like FTX.

“As a user, you also have responsibility — you can’t just blame all of the responsibility to other people. When bad things happen, if you blame all of the responsibility, if it’s always to other people, you will never be successful,” CZ explained.

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Crypto Exchange Okx Blocked by Russia’s Telecom Watchdog

Crypto Exchange Okx Blocked by Russia’s Telecom WatchdogRussian media and communications regulator, Roskomnadzor, has restricted access to the website of a major cryptocurrency exchange, Okx. The trading platform was one of those that did not restrict access for Russians amid sanctions that affected the industry’s business in Russia. Okx Blacklisted on Request From Russian Prosecutor’s Office for Disseminating Banned Information Russia’s Federal […]

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

CZ hits back at claims Binance is a Chinese company

The Binance founder has also detailed some personal and business-related challenges he had to overcome from the Chinese government, even before the launch of Binance in 2017.

Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has hit back at critics and conspiracy theorists who claim Binance to be a Chinese-based “criminal entity” that “secretly [belongs] in the pocket of the Chinese government.”

CZ’s response to critics came from a Thursday blog post via Binance, and stems from a Twitter spat with a former Washington Post journalist who asked him, “While I have you here, who’s Guangying Chen?”

He explained that the question is in reference to a conspiracy theory alleging that his personal friend and Chinese national Guangying Chen is the secret owner of Bijie Tech (a company he founded in 2015) and possibly also Binance.

However, CZ explains that Chen is a colleague of his that he met through a friend, which he hired to “manage the back office” at Bijie Tech before re-hiring her again at Binance, adding that conspiracy theorists then linked her as a secret owner of the firms given that she was one of the few to have initially remained in China.

Websites such as Scam Binance allege that Chen at one stage owned 93% of the shares in both Bijie Tech and Binance, among other things. CZ stated that such rumors originated from an “old campaign that a competitor launched via an anonymous microsite.”

“As a result, both she and her family have been targeted and harassed by the media and online trolls. Had I known how much of a negative impact this would have on her life, I never would have asked her to do what seemed like such an innocuous step at the time,” he said.

Links to China

CZ also strongly denied the claims that his company has close links to China and its government, and even went as far as discussing some of his troubling personal and business-related experiences with Chinese authorities:

“The greatest challenge that Binance faces today is that we (and every other offshore exchange) have been designated a criminal entity in China. At the same time, our opposition in the west bends over backward to paint us as a ‘Chinese company.’”

CZ is of the view that the ill-intended inferences come from the fact that he, along with a few other Binance employees are of Chinese ethnicity, making Binance “an easy target for special interests, media, and even policymakers that hate our industry.”

“The inference is that because we have ethnically Chinese employees, and perhaps because I am ethnically Chinese, we are secretly in the pocket of the Chinese government,” he said.

Views to that effect have been expressed by the media as recently as of Tuesday, with a Fortune India article describing Binance as a “Chinese-origin[ed] crypto exchange,” which claimed Binance and other Chinese-linked centralized crypto exchanges were “invading” India by freely operating their services within India through illegal means.

Chinese-infiltrated narratives continue to spread despite Binance never being legally incorporated in China and never operating like a Chinese company culturally, said CZ.

CZ added that Binance has subsidiaries in a number of countries, such as France, Spain, Italy, UAE and Bahrain, and has grown a team around the globe, adding that “we are active in pursuing top talent, no matter where they hail from:”

“Over the past two years, as we expanded into Europe and the Middle East and recruited a more senior leadership team, Binance’s executive team is now more heavily dominated by Europeans and Americans.”

“Our broader employee base is even more globally distributed. Despite these facts, some people insist on calling us a ‘Chinese company,’” he added.

Having fled from China to Canada at 12, CZ later returned to start a company in 2015, but was later shut down by the Chinese government:

“Two years before Binance, I started a company called Bijie Tech, providing exchange-as-a-service platforms to other exchanges. We got 30 clients on board, and business was good [...] Unfortunately, in March 2017, the Chinese government shut down all such exchanges. All of our clients went out of business.”

CZ said that he brought a few past Bijie Tech employees in to launch Binance in July 2017. However, the Chinese government again effectively shut it down six weeks later by issuing a memorandum stating that crypto exchanges were not allowed to operate in China, adding:

“They then blocked our platform behind the Great Firewall. At this point, most of our employees left China. Only a small number of customer service agents remained by late 2018.”

Related: Binance CEO sues Bloomberg subsidiary alleging defamation

Binance was legally incorporated in Cayman Islands in 2017, but currently has no formalized headquarters.

As of October 2021, Binance had accumulated an estimated 28.6 million crypto users, making it the world’s largest centralized crypto exchange. In November 2021, a former Binance executive said the company is worth over $300 million.

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Tether responds to Wall Street Journal ‘disinformation’

To attack Tether’s reserves [...] further highlights an agenda by the publication to single out Tether and hurt its reputation,” the USDT issuer said.

Tether Holdings Limited has clapped back at The Wall Street Journal over an article it claims spread “false information” about the stablecoin issuer’s profitability, solvency and accounting standards. 

In a Monday article, the Journal claimed that Tether could be deemed “technically insolvent” if its assets fell just 0.3%. That conclusion was drawn from Tether’s reported assets and liabilities as of Thursday. One week prior, Tether published its latest attestation showing $67.7 billion of reported assets against $67.5 billion of liabilities.

The August attestation was conducted by BDO Italia, the Italian arm of international accounting firm BDO Global. As Cointelegraph reported, Tether hired BDO Italia to increase the legitimacy and transparency of its attestations. In the process, the stablecoin issuer upped the frequency of its reporting from quarterly to monthly.

“The article seeks to discredit the work that Tether has put into transparent and honest communication to the public,” Tether said in a Tuesday blog post. “BDO, a very reputable and independent Top 5 audit firm, is not a “Tether accounting firm,” as erroneously written by the WSJ.”

In the blog post, Tether refuted the Journal’s claims that its exposure to short-term U.S. Treasury bills is an unsafe strategy. Tether also clapped back at assumptions that its business is unprofitable:

“According to our Consolidated Reserves Report, Tether has never disclosed any equity despite being profitable for several years. This same report has been deemed appropriate by important stakeholders and it has been accepted by the NYAG. Perhaps the WSJ has confused Tether with some of its competitors.”

Related: Tether fortifies its reserves: Will it silence critics, mollify investors?

As the crypto market’s oldest and largest stablecoin issuer, Tether is no stranger to criticism. Detractors hav long claimed that Tether’s USDT stablecoin is not adequately backed by reserves. Others have criticized the company’s use of commercial paper as backing. On June 27, The Wall Street Journal reported that short sellers have been “ramping up their bets against Tether” after the collapse of the Terra (Luna) — now renamed Terra Classic (LUNC) — ecosystem.

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Roskomnadzor Media Watchdog Unblocks Leading Russian Crypto News Outlet

Roskomnadzor Media Watchdog Unblocks Leading Russian Crypto News OutletRussia’s mass media regulator, Roskomnadzor, has restored access to a major Russian crypto news portal. Bits.media was recently blocked as a result of proceedings in a regional court that its representatives were not even summoned to attend. Crypto News Site Bits.media Again Available to Russian Readers as Roskomnadzor Delists It Bits.media, the source for crypto-related […]

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Russian Media Censor Roskomnadzor Blocks Major Crypto News Website

Russian Media Censor Roskomnadzor Blocks Major Crypto News WebsiteBits.media, a leading news outlet in Russia’s crypto space, has been blocked by Russia’s telecom and mass media watchdog, Roskomnadzor. The site is now inaccessible through most Russian internet providers, the online edition announced, stating it intends to contest the measure. Roskomnadzor Denies Russians Access to Bits.media Crypto news website Bits.media became unavailable to most […]

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation

Independent Russian News Site Meduza Raises Over $200,000 in Crypto

Independent Russian News Site Meduza Raises Over 0,000 in CryptoPressure from the Kremlin and sanctions from the West have forced Russian news outlet Meduza to increasingly rely on cryptocurrency donations to fund its independent journalism. As the restrictions imposed over Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine have prevented its Russian readers from contributing in fiat currency, the Riga-based website now accepts several digital coins. Meduza Pulls […]

Does Money Transmitting Require Control? DOJ Says No in Tornado Cash Litigation