1. Home
  2. Mobile Payments

Mobile Payments

Tether, TON team up with mobile app for USDT-to-fiat transactions

The Open Network users will be able to use Oobit’s Tap & Pay technology to pay merchants in fiat while spending USDT.

Transactions with Tether’s USDT and XAUt on The Open Network (TON) will be streamlined thanks to the incorporation of the Oobit mobile payment app, giving merchants a more convenient user experience.

Tether (USDT) and Tether Gold (XAUt) launched on TON in April. XAUt is pegged to the price of one fine troy ounce of gold. More than $200 million in USDT has been issued on TON, and users can send USDT in Telegram messages. Telegram has over 900 million users worldwide. TON also issues its own native Toncoin (TON) on the TON network.

In addition to TON, USDT is issued on 14 other blockchains, including Tron and Ethereum. It also joined the Celo network in March.

Read more

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

X payments details released: App to become your bank account

X users should eventually be able to use the app’s anticipated payment features to send money to other users, buy things in stores, and even earn interest on their account holdings.

X users will one day be able to use the platform to send money to other users, purchase goods from stores, and even earn interest on the money in their accounts as one would do with a bank account, said the head of payments at X. 

In an April 22 post, X payments chief information security officer Christopher Stanley said the payment capabilities of X would go beyond “just tipping” and expand to include an in-app wallet capable of storing and sending money to any other X users.

“Think Venmo at first. Then, as things evolve, you can gain interest, buy products, eventually use it to buy things in stores (think Apple Pay),” said Stanley.

Read more

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

ApplePay is the benchmark as crypto mobile payments push for adoption

Cryptocurrency-based mobile payments must be as functional as Apple Pay and Google Pay to challenge conventional payment services. according to Helio CEO Stijn Paumen.

Cryptocurrency payment platforms are slowly being onboarded to major e-commerce platforms and retail stores, but their user experience and performance don’t quite match that of Apple Pay. 

Stijn Paumen, CEO of growing crypto payments platform Helio, paints a picture of a sector still in its infancy during a one-on-one interview with Cointelegraph. 

The CEO and founder said that while Bitcoin and Ethereum are pioneering decentralized blockchain protocols, the base layer of both chains cannot compete with the performance and functionality of traditional financial infrastructure.

Read more

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

Crypto payments: PayPal’s stablecoin ripple effect on markets

Earlier this year, PayPal released its own stablecoin. What effect has it had on crypto adoption?

PayPal’s introduction of its native stablecoin, PayPal USD (PYUSD), has sparked heated debates within the crypto industry regarding its possible sway on payments and wider crypto adoption.

While this step seems to be a big jump toward accepting cryptocurrencies in regular finance, some industry observers advise caution.

What is PYUSD?

This initiative aims to bridge the fiat and digital currency realms for consumers, merchants and developers. PayPal CEO Dan Schulman highlighted the need for a stable digital-fiat conduit.

“The shift toward digital currencies requires a stable instrument that is both digitally native and easily connected to fiat currency like the U.S. Our commitment to responsible innovation and compliance, and our track record delivering new experiences to our customers, provides the foundation necessary to contribute to the growth of digital payments through PayPal USD.” 

Read more

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

Pay and dump? How businesses accepting crypto payments influence adoption

Crypto payments are often seen as a way to boost adoption, but is adoption growing if the business sells crypto right back? The answer is complex.

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts often argue that businesses need to start accepting crypto as payments for adoption to grow — boosting usability and potentially creating strong demand for these currencies.

Some crypto communities often focus heavily on growing business adoption, with maps now compiling businesses worldwide that accept different cryptocurrencies as a payment method.

But if a business accepts cryptocurrency payments only to dump them on the market, it may undermine the entire effort, as the assets are just being sold back on the market right after payment.

Moreover, a business accepting cryptocurrency payments through a third-party processor isn’t adhering to the cryptocurrency ethos of managing their own private keys, meaning controlling their wallet fully.

On the flip side, proponents argue that the mere act of enabling cryptocurrency payments opens up new avenues for consumers to transact in crypto, bringing in a new, long-awaited use case.

Do businesses accepting crypto boost adoption?

On its surface, a business accepting cryptocurrency payments would boost adoption. Still, if the digital currency received is immediately sold back on the market, it’s generating as much demand as it is supply. This simultaneous buy-sell cycle may not significantly contribute to cryptocurrency adoption.

Additionally, it isn’t clear how relevant a business accepting cryptocurrency payments can be for actual adoption, as users are unlikely to go through the process of buying cryptocurrencies if they can just pay in their local fiat currency.

The essence of adoption doesn’t merely reside in the act of acceptance by businesses; it fundamentally lies in the ease of access and willingness of consumers to transition to cryptocurrencies for their transactional needs.

A study by leading research and advisory firm Forrester Consulting revealed that merchants accepting Bitcoin (BTC) attracted new customers and sales.

The study found that cryptocurrency payments bring in up to 40% of new customers for merchants, with crypto customers spending twice as much as those using credit cards.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, BitPay chief marketing officer William Zielke referenced the Forrester Consulting study and said cryptocurrency payment processors give cryptocurrency spenders a fast, easy way to pay for large ticket items and everyday purchases.

Zielke said that during the first half of this year, BitPay saw a 10% uptick in new customer sign-ups compared to the previous year despite the volatile cryptocurrency market. He added that while some brands may already have a technically savvy user base when they start accepting crypto, other merchants may end up introducing new users to crypto:

“Alternatively, merchants like AMC Theatres connect with a broad base of customers who may need to be better-versed in the crypto world. Partnering with big brands like AMC Theatres is an excellent way to boost consumer adoption since it introduces crypto payments for everyday purchases.”

Sankar Krishnan, head of digital assets and fintech at consulting firm Capgemini, told Cointelegraph that money serves “both transactional and savings purposes” and that he would argue that “cryptocurrency captures greater interest from consumers today as they anticipate its value will rise in the future.”

Nevertheless, Krishnan said it’s crucial to acknowledge the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including their extreme volatility, which means that the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies for everyday transactions is “still a work in progress.”

Per Krishnan, when cryptocurrencies “become a more viable option for day-to-day purchases, we can expect more payment providers to embrace and facilitate cryptocurrency transactions.” He added, however, that whether a business keeps the cryptocurrencies it accepts for goods and services or sells them right away “is linked to the company’s treasury strategy.”

According to the Capgemini executive, the price volatility of cryptocurrencies heavily influences this choice, as the market can move in either direction between the firm accepting payment and selling the digital assets, which would only be beneficial if it were actively engaging in crypto trading.

A business accepting cryptocurrency payments and selling the crypto right away, Krishnan said, also “sends a clear message to the market that they do not anticipate the cryptocurrency’s value to appreciate in the future.” Per his words, it’s a “de-risking move” the business makes.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Justas Paulius, CEO of cryptocurrency payments processor CoinGate, took a balanced approach and said that it can’t be proven whether this buy-sell cycle has “a small, large or no impact at all as there are many factors that need to be considered first, for example, which cryptocurrency is being used, how and where it is being sold, and how much.”

Paulius added that consumers “tend to re-purchase cryptocurrency they’ve spent soon after,” suggesting that when businesses accept cryptocurrency, there’s indeed higher demand. He said, however, that the advantage may be in the generated liquidity:

“Whether the currency is being bought or sold, these actions from both sides create better liquidity in the market and, in a way, balances each other out, also helps determine the true price of a currency at any given moment.”

Businesses accepting cryptocurrency payments may nevertheless boost adoption in other ways, including by simply spreading awareness of their support for cryptocurrencies or specific payment processors that may offer other services.

Crypto payment processors as on-ramps

Cryptocurrency payment processors may allow businesses that do not accept cryptocurrency payments directly to allow consumers to pay with them. Major automobile manufacturer Honda, for example, does not accept crypto payments, but through FCF Pay, people can use Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to buy a Honda car.

Paulius noted that awareness spreads as “people see these payment options being introduced by small and large businesses every day,” which signals a growing demand for digital assets. These signals, he said, could see businesses’ competitors become “intrigued and curious.”

He added there’s “little-to-no downside to enabling a crypto payment method,” but instead “brings several tangible benefits” to businesses that do. According to the Forrester Consulting study, accepting crypto does seem to bring in more customers who spend more.

Third-party payment processors, BitPay said, help businesses stay compliant with all local regulations to facilitate accepting cryptocurrency payments while promoting new businesses to the cryptocurrency community as they start accepting crypto payments:

“Leveraging third-party payment processors allows businesses to accept crypto payments without the need to touch or hold crypto, removing the volatility risks. The quick integration times and easy setup make it a simple, fast alternative to using your own wallet. Companies utilizing a processor also escape having to track their costs based on different coins for tax purposes.”

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Gracy Chen, managing director at cryptocurrency exchange Bitget, said that the “e adoption of new things requires extensive user education to establish awareness and trust,” and businesses using third-party payment processors “can play a pivotal role in popularizing cryptocurrencies.”

While third-party payment processors can seemingly be on-ramps for the cryptocurrency space, it’s worth noting that their use dilutes the foundational ethos of cryptocurrencies centered on decentralization and self-sovereignty. Using them also means businesses rely on an external platform to receive crypto payments, which could be hard to change in the future if necessary.

Paulius said that, in some cases, it may be more beneficial for businesses to manage their wallets. These firms, he said, could just use open-source solutions and run their own processors.

The move, however, would come with added risks “such as AML [Anti-Money Laundering] screening or KYC [Know Your Customer] management as you still need to follow the law and adhere to rules. He added:

“Businesses tend to want to accept many cryptocurrencies at once, but only get periodic payouts in a single currency like U.S. dollars or euros to a bank account, which would be challenging to set up by yourself.”

Paulius noted that businesses also want easy integrations, transaction notifications, and the ability to refund customers and accept payments on various networks, all of which are facilitated by payment processors.

While there are costs associated with integrating cryptocurrency payments with third-party payment processors, Paulius concluded, they are “still less expensive than processing card payments.”

While accepting cryptocurrency payments may be challenging for most businesses, what to do with the received amounts may prove just as difficult. Most companies accepting crypto payments convert the funds immediately, but what if they didn’t?

Why pay with crypto?

Even if businesses accept cryptocurrency payments — via their own solutions or third-party payment processors — one question remains: why would consumers choose to pay with cryptocurrencies over their local fiat currency, especially if they don’t previously own crypto?

Paulius said that in some cases, banking is not an option, and cryptocurrencies could be a much-needed solution. Refugees or people stuck in dire situations in countries foreign to them or where the financial system isn’t functioning could rely on a decentralized network for their payments.

While Paulius conceded that “it is not common for consumers to buy cryptocurrencies just to use them for retail payments,” it noted it’s “likely in several cases,” as some people value their privacy greatly.

“Many of those people use cryptocurrencies for buying VPNs, hosting solutions, proxies and similar services just because they can remain pseudonymous and disclose less or none of their personal information to fewer third parties.” 

Cryptocurrencies, Paulius concluded, can also be a faster way to make transactions. Speaking to Cointelegraph, Ilya Volkov, CEO and co-founder of YouHodler, said that in the city of Lugano, Switzerland, BTC and Tether (USDT) can easily be used in various shops and restaurants via the same point-of-sale terminals used for traditional card payments.

Per Volkov, some startups are working on ways to use these terminals to let users pay directly from their MetaMask wallets.

Companies can provide a way for consumers to use cryptocurrencies, making these digital assets more familiar and useful. Additionally, third-party processors make it easier and less intimidating for businesses to start accepting cryptocurrencies, which might encourage other companies to do the same, seeing the growing interest.

The path to mainstream adoption is more complex, however, as what is done with the cryptocurrency and whether consumers even choose to pay in crypto play a pivotal role.

While more sophisticated and tech-savvy consumers will likely use cryptocurrency payments to protect their privacy, cryptocurrencies could also provide a lifeline in more extreme scenarios. Whether they’ll be accepted as a payment method when showtime comes remains to be seen.

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

Crypto remittances offer cheaper alternative, but still face challenges to adoption

Crypto remittances are a lifeline for many people who need to send money to their loved ones, as they provide faster, cheaper and more transparent transactions than traditional methods.

As the cryptocurrency market moves sideways and amid a deepening stablecoin exodus, the sector remains a vital lifeline for many sending money to loved ones while dodging extremely high fees that can be life-changing over time.

Cryptocurrency remittances have been seeing their adoption grow, and the low volatility seen in the space over the last few months might just be the silver lining that encourages more people to transition from mere spectators to active users, harnessing the true potential of this financial avenue.

Compared to traditional methods, crypto remittances sport numerous advantages, which include faster processing time, lower transaction costs and more transparency. Speaking to Cointelegraph, Brendan Berry, Ripple’s head of payments products, noted that for both fiat and crypto, the basic tenets of payment success are “speed, low-cost settlement, security and reliability.”

Berry noted that from a macro perspective, existing domestic payment rails work “relatively well” but face difficulties when cross-border payments are made. Berry added:

“There is no third party or global central bank, so the world has created this complex system of correspondent banking that is costly, error-prone, slow and leaves trillions of dollars in locked-up capital.”

He said that remittances have become a lifeline for millions worldwide and can be greatly improved through new technologies like crypto and blockchain. According to World Bank data, remittances grew 5% in 2022 to reach $682 billion.

Berry added that the high cost of remittances — ranging from 5% to 7% worldwide — and their slow speeds burden millions of families. He stated that the global economy “may seem like an always-online global marketplace, but traditional finance still operates on a 9 to 5, Monday to Friday, schedule.”

Cutting through high costs

The World Bank estimates the global average cost of sending $200 is 6.5% — a massive amount of money for families living on $200 or less a month.

Money from family members plays a critical role in developing countries. Source: Global Findex Database 2021

Speaking to Cointelegraph, a Coinbase spokesperson said that whether consumers use banks, money transfer operators or post offices, the impact of fees on their remittance payments is enormous, ranging from 10.8% with banks to 5.5% with post offices.

The spokesperson added that the U.S. average fee rate is 6.18%, which means that every year, Americans, on average, spend “close to $12 billion on remittance fees.” They added:

“Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ether can greatly cut the cost of sending money internationally by about 96.7% vs. the current system. Sending Bitcoin to another wallet costs an average of $1.50 per transaction, and Ether costs an average of $0.75 per transaction.”

It’s worth pointing out, however, that security concerns associated with custodying cryptocurrencies remain a deterrent for many to enter the space, as managing the private keys to a cryptocurrency wallet can be a challenge, especially to those less tech-savvy. On top of that, the consumer protections offered by the traditional financial system may leave some at ease despite the high fees.

Coinbase added that the time cost is also significant, with the average remittance taking between one and 10 days to settle, while cryptocurrency transactions take on average just 10 minutes.

Adding to this, a spokesperson for Circle — the firm behind the USD Coin (USDC) stablecoin — told Cointelegraph that a key feature of blockchain-powered remittances is “accessibility and inclusivity, requiring only a phone and internet connection to transfer funds across borders and at low-cost.”

Moreover, Lesley Chavkin, head of policy at the Stellar Development Foundation, a nonprofit organization supporting the Stellar network, told Cointelegraph that for remittances sent on a blockchain, preliminary data from “a small, limited-scope pilot focused on the United States to Colombia payment corridor” showed fees were half of those paid for traditional remittances.

Recent: From payments to DeFi: A closer look at the evolving stablecoin ecosystem

As transactions on the network scale up, Chavkin said, remittance fees could drop even more, furthering their advantages. Pavel Matveev, the co-founder and CEO of Wirex, told Cointelegraph that these don’t have to navigate through numerous intermediaries.

Despite their advantages, cryptocurrency remittances aren’t as widespread as one may think. For one, ease of use isn’t at the point of mass adoption, while the cryptocurrency market’s volatility keeps many on the sidelines.

Overcoming fundamental inefficiencies

Ripple’s Berry said that accessibility and user-friendliness are “critical components for the mainstream adoption of crypto remittances.”

User experience, he said, has been a problem for the industry but is arguably the easiest one to solve. He added that legacy payment solutions may appear to be more user-friendly with the use of modern interfaces “that marginally improve the customer experience, which creates the illusion of advancement,” while in reality, there has “been little improvement to the foundational infrastructure that underpins our global financial system which would ultimately unlock true progress and by extension the user experience.”

Nevertheless, Brendan conceded that while cryptocurrencies can be faster and cheaper for sending funds, a “successful remittance solution must also help the customer off-ramp funds in the currency of their choice.” He added:

 “The ability for users to transfer value from fiat to crypto or vice versa has historically been a challenge at both the individual and enterprise levels. While individual users have more options than ever before through more than 600 crypto exchanges globally, enterprise-grade off-ramp solutions are sparse.”

Indeed, one has to consider the costs associated with existing cryptocurrency infrastructure and how it interacts with the traditional financial system. While receiving a cryptocurrency transaction may be fast and cheap, paying with crypto isn’t as easy.

Commenting on the situation for Cointelegraph, Gero Piskov, card and payments manager at digital wealth platform Yield App, said that in “regions where crypto remittances thrive, accessibility and UX [user experience] have indeed been hurdles, which have hindered broader adoption.”

Often, the solution involves converting cryptocurrencies into fiat currency, which may incur additional transactions, trading fees and potential withdrawal fees. Converting to fiat currency, however, may be a bigger challenge than it should be, especially in regions where crypto-to-fiat liquidity isn’t significant enough to not add more complexity to the process.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, a Binance spokesperson said that the World Bank’s Global Findex 2021 shows 42% of adults in Latin America and the Caribbean still lack access to a bank account, with the segment representing 24% of the total adult population.

Cryptocurrency solutions, the spokesperson said, have the “potential to fill this gap while also reducing the financial transaction’s time and costs for people who already participate in the traditional system.”

In countries where paying with crypto with one solution or another is possible, users may be exposed to heightened spread they may not be aware of, as well as crypto market volatility. This volatility can completely nullify the advantages of paying less for the transaction itself.

Binance’s spokesperson added that the main goal of blockchain and cryptocurrencies is to simplify the entire process for users; hence, industry players are “dedicating significant efforts and resources into innovating and enhancing its platform with the users’ experience in mind.”

However, they noted that given the nascency of blockchain technology, there are still people without the technical know-how to process crypto transactions efficiently. The spokesperson said:

“One solution that has emerged would be liquidity services on particular blockchains. These international crypto liquidity service providers facilitate the transfer of money from one country to another, with cryptocurrencies acting as a bridge.”

In these blockchain-based liquidity services, Binance’s spokesperson clarified, a sender would transfer money in their own local currency, while the recipient would receive it in their local currency. Such a service would make the process friction and almost instantaneous for users across all backgrounds, they said.

Simplifying remittances and greatly reducing their cost is extremely important, especially for people losing between 5% and 10% of the money they need to survive on fees. This means that remittances have actually become a use case for digital assets, as noted by a Circle representative who spoke to Cointelegraph and added that crypto is expanding access to financial services across the globe.

Crypto as a tool to reduce poverty

Binance’s spokesperson seemingly corroborated the words from Circle, saying that remittances are “the primary economic lifeline for millions of families worldwide, and a major driver of economic growth for developing countries, totaling $589 billion in 2021,” according to World Bank data.

Top remittance recipient countries in millions of dollars in 2022. Source: World Bank and Knomad

Cryptocurrencies are improving the lives of people relying on remittances, according to experts Cointelegraph spoke to, thanks to the numerous advantages being offered. One example the Stellar Development Foundation’s Chavkin pointed to us is Félix.

Félix is a Whatsapp-based payments platform in Latin America that allows users to send money through an AI chatbot on Meta’s popular messaging platform. According to the platform’s co-founder and CEO Manuel Godoy, Félix uses USDC on the Stellar network to boil the process of remittances down to “seconds.”

Chavkin noted that the figure showing remittance payments grew by about 5% in 2022 “represents only recorded transactions; the true number is most likely significantly higher.” She concluded:

“Providing solutions that are faster, cheaper and more accessible is one tool to help reduce poverty and improve outcomes. Focusing on crypto remittances as a solution is critical to serving these populations.”

Wirex CEO Matveev told Cointelegraph that more may be coming in the near future as technology evolves and collaborations with traditional financial institutions are expected to, along with regulatory developments, make cryptocurrency remittances “even more widely accepted and efficient.”

The costs associated with reentering the fiat currency system may nevertheless hinder the advantages of cryptocurrency remittances. Conversion costs, according to Ripple’s Berry, may not necessarily impact remitters as various companies who support crypto-enabled payments have protections to avoid exposing users to volatility. Blockchain-based transactions, on the other hand, don’t.

Berry noted that forex transactions are also susceptible to volatility, with smaller fiat currencies being more volatile. The cryptocurrency space is nevertheless well-known for its volatility, which could keep some remitters on the traditional financial system, deciding that the fees are less problematic than the volatility and the challenges associated with using cryptocurrency for payments.

On top of that, the uncertain regulatory environment surrounding cryptocurrencies in various jurisdictions only further complicates their adoption as remittance solutions.

Magazine: Slumdog billionaire: Incredible rags-to-riches tale of Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal

Cryptocurrency remittances are effectively revolutionizing the way individuals across the globe who can rely on them exchange value, offering unprecedented advantages over traditional systems, with the crypto realm standing as a beacon of development for those currently losing part of their money to the high fees of a decades-old system.

While challenges persist, especially in terms of user experience and widespread adoption, a future in which cryptocurrency remittances do even more to alleviate poverty likely awaits, adding a new use case to an asset class already helping millions preserve value.

Cryptocurrency education and awareness, however, still has a long way to go to help crypto remittances become a viable long-term solution, as specialized knowledge is necessary to safely use these assets regularly.

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

CFPB examines Big Tech’s role in mobile payment systems ahead of rulemaking

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has focused on the role of Apple and Google in mobile payments with a critical eye.

Big businesses are able to act as “mini-governments” and impose their own rules on payment infrastructure, Rohit Chopra, director of the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), said at a fintech conference hosted by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank on Sept. 7. As Big Tech continues to innovate, small firms may be squeezed out of the space, he added.

The rapid development of consumer payment systems, particularly point-of-sale (POS) systems, has received little regulatory attention, in contrast to crypto assets, Chopra said:

“Big Tech companies have crept into the payments ecosystem to deepen consumer engagement on their platforms, harvest and potentially monetize transactions-related data, and exploit traditional financial sector fee streams.”

Apple and Google have come to be dominant in mobile payments, giving them an outsized impact on consumers’ access to mobile payment solutions. “Tap-to-pay” near-field communication (NFC) technology, for example, is gaining users rapidly but not spreading as widely as might be expected based on the way other apps have grown.

Related: Nigerian central bank adds NFC upgrade to eNaira for contactless payments

Apple’s requirement that NFC payments made on Apple mobile devices be routed through Apple Pay is one of the hindrances the technology faces. Chopra said:

“While I agree that strong challenges to the dominant Wall Street banks and card networks are important, there is real concern that the large technology firms will be able to erect even more gates and toll booths that will prevent small firms from emerging and succeeding.”

In October, the CFPB will propose rules to give consumers more rights over their personal financial data. Those rules will encourage open banking and payments by allowing consumers to switch services more easily, the bureau assured.

Point-of-sale payment methods compared. Source: CFPB

Chopra’s speech coincided with the release of a report by the bureau on mobile devices and POS systems that elaborated on Chopra’s point in more depth.

Magazine: Powers On… Biden accepts blockchain technology, recognizes its benefits and pushes for adoption

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

South Korean central bank charts out future course of payment systems, CBDC

The BOK 2022 Payment and Settlement Systems Report is a forward-looking document with ambitious plans for financial technology in the country.

The South Korean central bank (BOK) has published its 2022 Payment and Settlement Systems Report. Oversight of the systems was carried out successfully, the report said, and it is getting ready for a future with central bank digital currency (CBDC) and is discussing stablecoin regulation broadly.

The BOK-Wire+ fast payment system will be upgraded to real-time gross settlement (RTGS) and has adopted the ISO 20022 standard, which is expected to be implemented in 2028, the report said. The bank will also increase oversight of “Big Tech” payment services and build up its capabilities to respond to “IT operational risk.”

The BOK continued its preparations for the potential introduction of a CBDC, which included investigating the use of smart contracts, offline payments with near-field communications and cross-border payments. The bank connected 14 banks and the Korea Financial Telecommunications and Clearings Institute (KFTCI) with its simulated CBDC system for the second half of the year to verify its functioning.

The system handled 2,000 transactions per second. That figure is higher than most domestic payment systems, the report noted, but it slowed down as it reached capacity, so further improvements are needed.

The bank tried using a zero-knowledge proof protocol to clear CBDC transactions to improve their privacy. That allowed it to hide the wallet addresses and payment amount of the transaction, but it slowed the processing speed markedly and the security implications of a zkCBDC have not been investigated. It said it may consider homomorphic encryption as well.

Related: CBDCs should protect privacy, not be a surveillance tool: Former CFTC chair

The BOK will step up CBDC research, with plans to look at CBDC-based tokenized deposits and expanding the scope of the research with the banks and KFTCI. It said:

“A key focus of the BOK’s research will be identifying a CBDC operating model with minimally adverse impacts on the stability of the financial system and on the effectiveness of monetary policy.”

The report noted “concrete” progress toward crypto asset regulation in the country with the introduction of the Framework Act on Digital Assets Act, but the regulatory framework is still too incomplete for it to allow payments in cryptocurrencies. The bank is also engaged in discussions about stablecoin, it stated repeatedly.

Magazine: South Korea’s unique and amazing crypto universe

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

Money stored on mobile payment apps may not be FDIC insured, US watchdog warns

Deposits on mobile payment apps may not be insured by the FDIC, and customers may not know whether their money is insured or not.

Keep your money in an insured account, not on an uninsured payment app, the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) warned Americans in a report released June 1. The increasing popularity and utility of nonbank peer-to-peer (P2P) payment apps, including for crypto asset transactions, makes the risk of loss in the event of a crisis ever more concerning, the watchdog said.

Public awareness of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) coverage has grown since the bankruptcy of crypto platforms like FTX, Voyager and others last year, and this year’s banking crisis led to the loss of hundreds of millions of customer dollars, CFPB said. Nonetheless, billions of dollars are being stored on payment service apps without the benefit of FDIC coverage.

Many P2P apps — the CFPB lists PayPal, Venmo, Cash App, Apple Pay and Google Pay as examples — offer stored value services “that closely resemble deposit accounts.” Meta Pay does not offer services of that type.

Payment service providers are motivated to encourage customers to store funds with them because those funds can be used by the provider for investment purposes, subject to legal constraints, while the services rarely pay interest on stored funds. Providers are subject to the risk of those investments losing value.

Related: Cash App Bitcoin revenue tops $2B in the first quarter

Even in the event that customer funds were held in an FDIC-insured account, the customer’s eligibility for pass-through deposit coverage is only determined after a failure has occurred, CFPB said. Furthermore, the insurance protects against the failure of the bank, not the payment service, which is typically regulated at the state level and not subject to federal supervision. Most state regulation was designed for money transfer, not storage.

Thus, funds held by PayPal or Venmo in their program banks may be eligible for pass-through insurance, but funds that have been invested by the providers are not eligible. Customers may not know where their deposits are stored.

Mobile payment services are increasingly enabling crypto asset transactions. Crypto assets are not insured, although services like PayPal and Venmo allow customers to hold crypto in their accounts.

Magazine: ‘Account abstraction’ supercharges Ethereum wallets: Dummies guide

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back

Strike moves global headquarters to El Salvador, expands to 65 countries

According to Strike CEO Jack Mallers, the expansion drive aims to counter the “clouded world of crypto exchanges and hidden, unregistered licensing regimes and 1,000 different coins.”

Strike, a Chicago-based Bitcoin (BTC) payment provider, expanded its services to 65 countries in parallel to relocating its global headquarters to El Salvador. Before its expansion, the mobile app was operational only in the United States, El Salvador and Argentina.

According to Jack Mallers, the CEO and founder of Zap, Strike's parent company, the expansion drive aims to counter the “clouded world of crypto exchanges and hidden, unregistered licensing regimes and 1,000 different coins.” Speaking to Fortune, Mallers revealed that the move to relocate its headquarters to El Salvador was a response to the growing anti-crypto regulatory sentiments in the U.S.

On one hand, regulations prevent Strike from offering its service in New York. On the other hand, El Salvador introduced crypto-inclusive regulations to attract technological innovations in the region.

During the discussion, Mallers spoke about El Salvador’s success in establishing Bitcoin as a legal tender. He believed that merchant adoption “wasn’t what was defining success.” Instead, he weighed El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption success in terms of other factors including increased tourism.

Strike will initially allow users in the new global markets to only receive Bitcoin, however, Mallers revealed plans to launch new features by the end of the year, including a debit card. For markets outside the US, Strike will enable U.S. dollar payments via Tether (USDT).

“Two years ago, people would have made fun of me [for our] headquarters in El Salvador to launch product for three billion people, but now Coinbase is fighting with Gary Gensler,” he said. “Who’s laughing now?,” Mallers concluded.

Related: US lawmakers target perceived risks of crypto adoption in El Salvador with reintroduced bill

Strike and crypto exchange Bitfinix were among the first crypto companies to bag operational licenses in El Salvador.

El Salvador’s Digital Asset Service provider license allows Bitfinex Securities “to facilitate the issuance and secondary trading of assets” with clearly defined rights and obligations in the jurisdiction.

Hashing It Out: How Web3 makes shopping better with crypto cash-back