1. Home
  2. openai

openai

The absurd AI mania is coming to an end

AI large language models raised over $25 billion in the first half of 2023. The industry is starting to look like a bubble that’s about to burst.

Venture capital interest in cryptocurrency has decreased significantly since the bull run of 2021. At $2.3 trillion in market capitalization, every VC wanted a piece of the industry.

The picture is now very different. Another dominant force in the market has attracted the vast majority of venture funding over the past year: artificial intelligence large language models (LLMs).

However, AI has already started showing signs of weaknesses that indicate a giant bubble ready to pop. By the time most people realize it, it will be too late.

The beginning of AI domination

AI dominance in the VC market started on Nov. 30, 2022, with the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. From OpenAI’s perspective, it couldn’t have chosen a better time.

With the collective failures of Celsius, Voyager, Three Arrows Capital, Terra and FTX, 2022 was a crypto nightmare. The VCs desperately wanted a way out of the seemingly toxic industry to park their cash elsewhere.

Precisely 19 days after the collapse of FTX, LLMs opened up an entirely new space for VCs to venture into. ChatGPT onboarded a million users in just five days, showing unprecedented demand in the market.

That was the opening companies like Google, Microsoft, Facebook and other tech behemoths needed to jump headfirst into the chaos searching for opportunities.

Microsoft acquired a significant chunk of OpenAI and launched the Bing AI chatbot. Google launched Bard, leveraging Google AI and DeepMind, its own version of GPT. Facebook ramped up its speed on developing Llama.

While these major companies compete on core products, thousands of smaller companies have launched to get a piece of the pie. As I mentioned above, VCs went all in on AI startups.

Jasper AI, a GPT-based copywriting platform, raised $125 million at a $1.5 billion valuation. Anthropic raised $450 million, backed by Google. Inflection AI, building Chatbot Pi, raised $1.3 billion at a $4 billion valuation. Mistral AI raised $113 million in seed funds with no products or proof-of-concept. In the entire first half of 2023, AI startups raised over $25 billion. 

A survey conducted by PitchBook found that 74% of surveyed investors had invested in at least one artificial intelligence/machine learning startup. And 14% of them claimed to have invested in more than six such startups. 

This and other such surveys show that AI has climbed the ladder from being a dormant research field to a lucrative marketplace in just a few months.

GPU shortage

The question one should ask is: Where exactly are these millions of dollars going? In any other space, a significant chunk of raised funds goes into research and development and customer acquisition. However, with AI, the focus is entirely elsewhere: graphics processing units.

These AI startups are spending the vast majority of raised funds on acquiring high-performing GPUs from companies like Nvidia and AMD. Taking the huge demand and a broken supply chain, we are looking at a critical GPU shortage right now.

An industry insider analyzed the current demand for GPUs, and all around, the market wants about 432,000 H100 GPUs. “At approx $35k a piece, that’s about $15b worth of GPUs [excluding Chinese companies like ByteDance, Baidu and Tencent].”

To put the numbers into perspective, GPT-4 required around 10,000–25,0000 A100s. Meta, Tesla and Stability AI combined use around 34,000 A100s.

AI startups are trying to out-pay their competitors to acquire these GPUs. In the long run, the GPU supply and demand will come back on par, probably by the end of 2024, as some experts predict.

The question, therefore, is whether it’s worth it to invest in companies that are essentially not building a product moat but fighting to acquire tools.

Lack of IP

While some startups are building a core product, the vast majority of AI platforms are lurking in the periphery, using API to siphon off services from OpenAI.

AI startups like Jasper AI use the OpenAI API to provide services. Much like what we saw with the recent Reddit API fiasco, products that overly rely on APIs have zero control or ownership of intellectual property.

And that is becoming clearer every day.

Jasper recently laid off a chunk of its workforce as demand for AI platforms decreases. Another AI startup, Mutiny, laid off around 30% of its employees.

Recent data shows a decline in interest in ChatGPT for the first time since it hit the market. Other AI chatbots like Bard or Bing aren’t doing well either, a clear signal of market saturation as the novelty factor wears off.

ChatGPT and other major platforms are seeing decreased interest. Credit: Chandler Nguyen

There are also reports of increased inaccuracies in GPT-4. A Stanford study found that GPT-3.5 and GPT-4’s performance on numerous tasks has gotten “substantially worse over time.”

While core products like GPT and DeepMind are important in leading the AI race, it’s clear that the market has gained an unhealthy amount of weight, causing it to form a bubble. All it needs is a slight pinch in the form of some industry reports or a couple of bankruptcies to burst the bubble.

Chris Coll-Beswick is the founder and managing partner of Transcend Labs, a Web3 incubation platform. He’s also a mentor and judge for Stanford’s AI & Web3 Research Lab Association. Prior to Transcend Labs, he founded Yeswetrust and Calibre Capital. He holds an undergraduate degree from the University of Sheffield.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

Worldcoin stuck after 70% drop from peak — More downside for WLD price?

WLD price may get anchored to $2 until October, primarily due to its initial supply distribution.

The price of Worldcoin (WLD) has stabilized after a volatile debut across mainstream cryptocurrency exchanges.

On July 29, the WLD price rose nearly 6% to $2.35. Still, the token was down 70% from its market debut peak of $7.50.

It now appears stuck inside the $2–2.50 trading range, hinting at a growing bias conflict in the market.

WLD/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

WLD could stick around $2 until October

Notably, WLD is a part of the Worldcoin Foundation launched by OpenAI’s Sam Altman on July 24.

The token has a maximum circulation supply of 143 million, with 43 million going to Worldcoin’s app users via airdrop — 25 WLD per user — if they verify their identity using an eye-scanning physical orb.

Worldcoin circulating supply as of July 29, 2023. Source: Dune Analytics

The remaining 100 million tokens have been loaned to market makers outside the United States until October 2023. These market makers can return the WLD tokens or buy them for $2 + ($0.04 * X) — where X is the number of tokens being purchased divided by 1 million.

As a result, WLD price appears to be anchored around the $2 level, which, according to Kaiko Research, could be Worldcoin's strategy to keep the token attractive for potential users.

“Convincing people to scan their eyes for 25 units of a token that doesn’t yet exist can be challenging; if the token’s price is, say, $0.10, it’s even more challenging,” the data analysis firm said in its latest report, adding:

“The 25 WLD tokens are currently worth a little more than $50 and will likely stay in that range for the next three months. So far, this seems to be enticing people to sign up and scan.“

Worldcoin price technical analysis

The total number of Optimism wallets holding WLD tokens has jumped to nearly 305,000 since July 24, according to Dune Analytics.

Optimism wallets holding WLD. Source: Dune Analytics

Meanwhile, WLD transfer volume has dropped in the same timeframe. These metrics show that most traders have preferred to hold the token.

WLD transfer volume sine. Source: Dune Analytics

As a newly launched token, WLD lacks enough trading history to conduct a long-term price analysis. However, on a shorter-timeframe chart, the Worldcoin token appears to be fluctuating inside an ascending channel pattern.

WLD/USD hourly price chart. Source: TradingView

As of June 29, the price traded near the channel’s lower trendline while eyeing a rebound toward the $2.35–2.40 range (marked as “resistance 1” in the chart above), which coincides with the upper trendline.

Related: Worldcoin is making reality look like a lot like Black Mirror

A close above the upper trendline may increase WLD’s prospects of rallying further toward the $2.50–2.56 range (resistance 2) in Q3, up around 12% from current price levels.

On the other hand, breaking below the lower trendline could bring the WLD price inside the $2.15–2.20 range (support 1). A close below the lower trendline range could have the price test the $2–2.10 range as its next downside target, down approximately 10% from current price levels.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

Worldcoin is making reality look like a lot like Black Mirror

OpenAI’s sister company Worldcoin wants you to buy its coin — and possibly unleash a tempest of problems across the world in the process.

Scanning your iris to become a “verified human” in exchange for digital currency sounds like a Black Mirror episode. But this is not the story arc of a dystopian science fiction show — it’s happening now with one of the latest projects in Web3.

The launch of Worldcoin on Optimism has left many wondering whether this project is subverting Web3’s promise of decentralization to build just the opposite. And yet, more than 2 million people in underserved areas have already signed up to share their biometric data with Worldcoin in exchange for 25 WLD, worth less than $100 at the time of writing.

This is not just strange — it also presents serious privacy risks and creates a honeypot for bad actors. More so, there’s an argument to be made that it could even interfere with the sovereignty of foreign countries.

Why would we need Worldcoin in the first place?

Worldcoin was founded to solve for the expected externalities of its sister company, OpenAI — the creator of ChatGPT and other popular AI products. One hand is solving the problems the other hand is creating.

In the words of its founders: “If successful, we believe Worldcoin could drastically increase economic opportunity, scale a reliable solution for distinguishing humans from AI online while preserving privacy, enable global democratic processes, and eventually show a potential path to AI-funded UBI [universal basic income].”

The problem with Worldcoin

Despite the ambition and promise to safeguard privacy, a whole new set of problems arises from the fact that this is being done by a single, currently centralized company. The irony is not lost on ChatGPT. Some of its answers when prompted “What are the risks in having one company own biometric data for individuals in underdeveloped countries?” include:

  • Privacy violations
  • Security breaches
  • Surveillance and sovereignty

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has echoed some of these concerns as well.

Having one company own biometric data for individuals in underdeveloped countries poses significant risks for individuals. On a broader societal scale, these are even more significant when coupled with UBI payments to foreign citizens.

Privacy violations

Biometric data like irises is highly sensitive and unique to each individual. It can reveal information such as sex, ethnicity and, perhaps, medical conditions. If a single company controls this data, there’s a high risk of privacy violations, as it can be used to track and monitor individuals without their consent.

Related: The world could be facing a dark future thanks to CBDCs

Who’s to say that the company would not exploit the biometric data for commercial gains, such as targeted advertising or selling the data to other entities? Isn’t that diametrically opposed to what we have been trying to achieve for the last few years?

Security breaches

Centralizing biometric data also puts it at a higher risk of being targeted by hackers and cybercriminals. This is what’s known in security sectors as a “honeypot” when used for controlled purposes. A large amount of attractive data is stored by a single entity in order to study a potential breach under the understanding that it will eventually be hacked.

Related: CBDCs will lead to absolute government control

A data breach at this scale could lead to severe consequences, including identity theft, fraud, and unauthorized access to the personal information of millions of people.

Surveillance and sovereignty

This data could also fall into the hands of governments to subpoena the data and obtain citizens’ personal information without a warrant. There are fewer protections when you sell your data to a third party. A corrupt government may use this data to manipulate behaviors, limit dissent and suppress opposition, essentially turning underdeveloped regions into surveillance states.

More so, if the company operates across borders, it could wield undue power and influence over governments and societies. Financially supporting a large number of foreign citizens under a universal basic income model could ultimately reduce the autonomy and sovereignty of a country’s democratic processes.

When visiting Worldcoin’s Orbs to scan their irises, registrants are given a promotional sticker that reads “Verified Human.” There’s a slight feeling of discomfort in being referred to simply as human here — not person.

In the context of selling your identity for a few bucks to a cryptocurrency project with ties to AI development, it almost sounds like a Freudian slip. It’s as if personhood is a forgotten idea, and now we’re just humans in a massive database of biometric data.

Sometimes reality really is stranger than fiction.

Matthew Niemerg is a co-founder and board member of the Aleph Zero Foundation. He holds a Ph.D. in Mathematics from Colorado State University and currently serves as an expert on the EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum. He is also a co-founder of Cardinal Cryptography.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

Worldcoin (WLD) Surges As Binance, Bybit, OKX and Others Add Support for New Digital Identity Project

Worldcoin (WLD) Surges As Binance, Bybit, OKX and Others Add Support for New Digital Identity Project

A new digital identity blockchain project co-founded by Sam Altman of OpenAI is surging as major exchanges add support. Worldcoin (WLD), a new crypto project using iris scans with physical hardware called “Orbs” to create unique digital identities, is up 34% in the last 24 hours. Worldcoin’s surge follows the coin’s listing on several of […]

The post Worldcoin (WLD) Surges As Binance, Bybit, OKX and Others Add Support for New Digital Identity Project appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

Meta and Microsoft launch open-source AI model Llama 2

Llama 2 is trained on 40% more public data and can process twice as much context than Llama 1, according to Meta.

Big Tech firms Meta and Microsoft have teamed up to launch Llama 2, an open-source large language model from Meta that will feature on Microsoft’s Windows and cloud computing platform Azure.

The pair announced the collaboration on July 18 saying Llama 2 was made free for research and commercial use while also being optimized to run on Windows.

The announcement confirmed rumors from last week that said Llama 2 would be built for businesses and researchers to create applications on Meta’s AI tech stack.

Meta claimed Llama 2 was trained on 40% more publicly available online data sources and can process twice as much context compared to Llama 1.

The firm said Llama 2 outperforms many competitor open-source LLMs when it comes to coding, proficiency, reasoning and performance on knowledge tests. However, Meta conceded it isn’t quite as efficient compared to its closed-source competitors such as OpenAI’s GPT-4, according to one of its research papers

In a July 18 Instagram post, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Llama 2 “gives researchers and businesses access to build with our next generation large language model as the foundation of their work.”

Mark Zuckerberg with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. Source: Instagram

Meta said it was “blown away” by the demand for Llama 1 following the release of its limited version in February, which received over 100,000 requests for access. The model was soon leaked online by a user of the imageboard website 4chan.

Related: AI has potential to send Bitcoin price over $750K — Arthur Hayes

Llama 1's figures, however, were far off from ChatGPT’s, which saw an estimated 100 million or more users sign up to use the model in the first three months, according to a February Reuters report.

With the partnership, Microsoft now backs two big players in the AI space, having invested a cumulative $13 million in OpenAI over the course of 2023, according to a January report by Fortune.

Meta’s decision to open source Llama was criticized by two United States senators in June, who claim that the “seemingly minimal” protections in the first version of Llama potentially opened the doors for malicious users to engage in “criminal tasks.”

Magazine: AI Eye: AI travel booking hilariously bad, 3 weird uses for ChatGPT, crypto plugins

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

Dogecoin Co-Founder Has High Hopes for Billionaire Elon Musk’s New AI Venture, Calling It ‘Really Interesting’

Dogecoin Co-Founder Has High Hopes for Billionaire Elon Musk’s New AI Venture, Calling It ‘Really Interesting’

The co-founder of the popular memecoin Dogecoin (DOGE) has enthusiasm for billionaire Elon Musk’s new artificial intelligence (AI) project. Earlier this week, Musk launched his artificial intelligence startup project, xAI, as a means of competing with chatbot ChatGPT, a prominent AI tool. According to Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015, the firm that created ChatGPT, […]

The post Dogecoin Co-Founder Has High Hopes for Billionaire Elon Musk’s New AI Venture, Calling It ‘Really Interesting’ appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

OpenAI pauses ChatGPT’s Bing feature as users were jumping paywalls

OpenAI found a bug in its Browse plugin that inadvertently allowed users to read paywalled articles in some cases.

ChatGPT’s Browse, a Bing-based search engine feature, has been temporarily disabled by OpenAI after a loophole enabled users to bypass paywalled content.

In a July 4 tweet, OpenAI notified users of the temporary halt so it could patch the issue and “do right by content owners.”

“We've learned that ChatGPT's ‘Browse’ beta can occasionally display content in ways we don't want, e.g. if a user specifically asks for a URL's full text, it may inadvertently fulfill this request. We are disabling Browse while we fix this.”

Browse is currently in beta and is available to subscribers of the ChatGPT Plus service. As early issues get ironed out in the testing phase it appears OpenAI may have acted on the issue in response to a Reddit post.

In late June, a member of the r/ChatGPT subReddit posted a screenshot of a Browse session where they asked the chatbot to “print the text” of a link to a paywalled article from The Atlantic.

In response, ChatGPT provided the article in full without the paywall.

Post on r/ChatGPT showing it could scrape text hidden behind paywalls. Source: Reddit

The post received 6,200 upvotes and 284 comments with some speculating that ChatGPT “uses the same mechanism” as online paywall removers which “reads the google-cached version” that doesn’t have a paywall for Search Engine Optimization purposes.

Another Reddit user “Red_Laughing_Man” suggested ChatGPT might simply be able to ignore any paywall code that is used to put a banner over the top of the content until someone has either signed up or logged in.

One Redditor aptly urged people to “Enjoy it while it lasts.”

Related: Google updates its privacy policy to allow data scraping for AI training

The use of data scraping to train AI models has become a prevalent issue over recent months.

On July 1, Twitter owner Elon Musk cited data scraping as the reason for new limits on how many tweets users can read per day on the platform.

OpenAI has previously been sued over the issue. Cointelegraph reported on June 29 that the ChatGPT creator was hit with a class action lawsuit for allegedly scraping private user information from the internet.

Magazine: AI Eye: AI travel booking hilariously bad, 3 weird uses for ChatGPT, crypto plugins

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

100K ChatGPT logins have been leaked on dark web, cybersecurity firm warns

The compromised accounts could give bad actors confidential information about companies and individuals.

Over the past year, more than 100,000 login credentials to the popular artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT have been leaked and traded on the dark web, according to a Singaporean cybersecurity firm.

A June 20 blog post by Group-IB revealed just over 101,000 compromised logins for OpenAI’s flagship bot have traded on dark web marketplaces between June 2022 and May 2023.

The login information was found in the logs of “info-stealing malware.” May 2023 saw a peak of nearly 27,000 ChatGPT-related credentials made available on online black markets.

The Asia-Pacific region had the highest amount of compromised logins for sale over the past year, making up around 40% of the nearly 100,000 figure.

Indian-based credentials took the top spot overall with over 12,500 and the United States had the sixth most logins leaked online at nearly 3,000. France was seventh overall behind the U.S. and took the pole position for Europe.

The number of exploited ChatGPT accounts over the past year by region. Source: Group-IB

ChatGPT accounts can be created directly through OpenAI. Additionally, users can choose to use their Google, Microsoft or Apple accounts to login and use the service.

Cointelegraph contacted OpenAI for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Related: How AI is changing the way humans interact with machines

Group-IB said it noticed an uptick in the number of employees using ChatGPT for work. It warned confidential information about companies could be exposed by unauthorized users as user queries and chat history is stored by default.

Such information could then be exploited by others to undertake attacks against companies or individual employees.

The firm advised users to regularly update passwords and use two-factor authentication to better secure ChatGPT accounts.

Interestingly, the firm noted that the press release was written with the assistance of ChatGPT. 

AI Eye: Is AI a nuke-level threat? Why AI fields all advance at once, dumb pic puns

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report

7 alternatives to ChatGPT

ChatGPT alternatives offer unique features and functionalities, expanding the possibilities of interactive AI-driven interaction.

While ChatGPT is a popular language model, there are several alternatives available for various natural language processing tasks. Here are seven alternatives to ChatGPT:

Google Bard

Google’s experimental conversational artificial intelligence (AI) chat service, Bard, provides a web-based interactive platform. It functions similarly to ChatGPT but sources its knowledge differently. Like many other AI chatbots, Bard can code, figure out math issues, and help with writing.

Google Bard is built on the foundation of Transformer, an open-source neural network architecture that also supports LaMDA, Google’s prior Language Model for Dialogue Applications. The Pathways Language Model 2 (PaLM 2), which debuted in late 2022, is what powers it. Users can visit bard.google.com, sign in with their Google Account, and then enter their questions or prompts in the given text box to start a dialogue with Bard.

Related: Google’s Bard vs. OpenAI’s ChatGPT

Bing AI

With the added ease of voice search and conversation, the Bing app enables users to use Bing Conversation whenever and wherever they want. The app ensures a seamless experience by syncing search history and preferences across devices.

Using OpenAI’s ChatGPT (version 4) Large Language Model(LLM), Microsoft’s Bing Chat is an AI chatbot. In contrast to conventional search engines, Bing Chat provides comprehensive responses to queries rather than just a list of links. In addition to helping with query-related tasks, it can also support activities like composing stories, poems and computer code, as well as data analysis.

Bing Chat offers tailored and interesting conversations with its three discussion styles — creative, balanced and precise. By providing a chatbot that blends knowledge, imagination and support in an engaging and user-friendly way, Microsoft intends to transform search experiences.

ChatSonic

Writesonic developed ChatSonic, a sophisticated Chrome extension, to improve productivity when using Gmail, Twitter, LinkedIn and the internet. ChatSonic is a powerful chatbot with more features than ChatGPT. Chatsonic, as opposed to ChatGPT, uses the internet, references, AI image generation and more to improve one’s conversational experience.

One’s email workflow can be easily streamlined using ChatSonic:

  • Create top-notch emails right from Gmail.
  • Quickly grasp complicated emails and threads and summarize them.
  • Get complete email conversation timeline summaries.
  • Respond to emails right away to save time.

You.com

Bryan McCann, a seasoned pioneer in AI, and Richard Socher, a former chief scientist at Salesforce, co-founded You.com, which is revolutionizing the search experience. You.com enables people to seek less and create more thanks to a collection of generative AI tools and a dedication to privacy.

YouChat, a conversational AI interface that delivers quick answers and content development with sophisticated AI capabilities, is one of the features available in the Chrome extension. YouCode, a different part of You.com, functions as a specialized coding search engine that makes it simple for coders to locate and copy/paste code fragments from more than 20 coding sources.

One of You.com’s main advantages is the emphasis it places on privacy. Users are shielded from data sharing, targeted advertising and online tracking when YouChat is chosen as their primary search engine. Because the extension is open-source, users can confirm the rights requested, ensuring accountability and user control. 

The lack of intrusive advertisements makes each result more valuable, further enhancing the You.com search experience. Users have the flexibility and convenience to change the default search engine they use among You.com, YouChat, YouCode and Google. 

Jasper AI

Jasper Chat is a new conversational AI platform that, like ChatGPT, provides a more interactive and natural way of engaging with generative AI. It utilizes OpenAI’s GPT 3.5 language model and is specifically designed for business applications, such as marketing and sales. 

While both Jasper Chat and ChatGPT seek to increase AI’s usability, Jasper Chat is more concerned with meeting the demands of enterprises. Jasper Chat provides a risk-free opportunity to investigate the writing talents of AI with a seven-day free trial and cost-effective pricing plans starting at just $39 per month (including Creator, which can be used to fetch watermark-free, limitless high-resolution image production).

Related: 5 ChatGPT chrome extensions to enhance productivity

Perplexity AI

An alternative to ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, has been trained using OpenAI’s API and provides impressive responses. The website has a straightforward and minimalist layout. Similar to ChatGPT, it enables users to converse and receive responses that range from straightforward to complex.

Perplexity stands out because of its unique ability to cite and derive information from the sources it uses to respond to queries, such as Wikipedia. Also, it does not copy-paste content from the sources it uses to fetch information, demonstrating that Perplexity diligently presents authentic information.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered pair programmer that enhances your coding experience by providing autocomplete-style suggestions. It offers two ways to receive suggestions: You can either start writing the code you need, and Copilot will generate relevant suggestions, or you can write a natural language comment describing the desired functionality, and Copilot will provide corresponding code suggestions. This intelligent tool assists you in writing code more efficiently and effectively, making the development process smoother and faster.

GitHub Copilot seamlessly integrates with popular development environments, such as Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Vim, Neovim and the JetBrains suite of integrated development environments. The two solutions for managing accounts offered by GitHub Copilot are GitHub Copilot for individuals and GitHub Copilot for businesses. Individuals can use GitHub Copilot through personal accounts, and organizations can manage it through organization accounts.

GitHub Copilot is free to use for some groups. Users who have been verified as students, instructors or maintainers of well-known open-source projects are free to use GitHub Copilot. If you do not fit into one of these categories, you can take advantage of GitHub Copilot’s free 30-day trial offer. For continued access and use, however, a paid subscription is necessary after the trial period has ended.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Refund Requirements Following Crypto Hacks: Report