1. Home
  2. public blockchain

public blockchain

Bitcoin’s price won’t ‘dramatically’ increase from here, says billionaire

Peter Thiel also believes that Bitcoin’s original vision as a cypherpunk, crypto-anarchist, freedom tool hasn’t been fulfilled.

Former PayPal CEO Peter Thiel has raised doubts that Bitcoin’s (BTC) future price can increase “dramatically” from current price levels.

The billionaire — who still owns “some” Bitcoin but not as much as he “should have” — isn’t sure where the next batch of buyers will come from now that Bitcoin has had its “ETF edition.”

“I'm not sure it's going to go up that dramatically from here. We got the ETF edition and I don't know who else buys it,” Thiel, a founder at the Founders Fund told CNBC on June 28.

Read more

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

Ernst & Young taps ZK-proofs on Ethereum to automate contracts

EY said it chose Ethereum instead of a private network as it is cheaper, more confidential and prevents a party from gaining a “strategic advantage” over another.

Big Four accounting firm Ernst & Young has launched an Ethereum-based solution using zero-knowledge proofs aimed at helping its private business clients facilitate complex contracts.

Called the EY OpsChain Contract Manager (OCM), the solution will help private businesses execute complex business agreements in a timely, confidential and cost-effective manner, the firm explained in an April 17 statement.

Among the types of contracts that can leverage EY’s Ethereum-based solution are purchase agreements, standardized rate cards, volume discounts, rebates and strike prices.

Read more

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

‘Worst code I’ve ever seen’: Euro stablecoin faces centralization criticism

Some pundits shared harsh sentiment towards a new euro-pegged stablecoin, but it's not publically accessible for the time being.

Criticism has been leveled at a new euro-pegged stablecoin released in France due to a decision to restrict peer-to-peer transactions.

French bank Societe Generale-Forge (SGF) released the Ethereum-based stablecoin called EUR CoinVertible (EURCV) on April 20 which is available to only qualified institutional clients.

According to observers who reviewed its smart contract code, ERC-20 transfers need to first be approved by a centralized registrar — presumably one controlled by the bank — before the transaction is processed.

In an April 20 tweet, pseudonymous smart contract engineer “alephv.eth” explained:

“They coded it so they have to whitelist all users, process all user transfers, and even process your ERC20 approvals before they process your 'transferFrom' lmao.”

She further mocked the code in a separate post, stating it was a "radical commitment to inefficiency in the name of regulation."

Nonfungible token (NFT) project founder “foobar” tweeted to his over 127,000 followers on April 20 that it’s “the worst code I’ve ever seen” and described the stablecoin as a “laughing stock.”

Crypto researcher Mason Versluis also tweeted the code was “absolutely horrible” and suggested the French bank “stop trying to weasel” into crypto.

Plenty of others chipped in on the criticism, but Ether (ETH) investor Ryan Berckman provided a more neutral analysis.

He explained that many traditional financial firms like SGF will take “baby steps” as they move into blockchain and digital assets:

“Obviously, non-compliant, non-composable, allowlist-style stables are going to be uncompetitive in the market. Baby steps, they are coming from tradfi, they'll see it soon enough and switch to a USDC-style denylist.”

Berckman explained SGF may also be incorrect in its claim to be the first bank to launch an institutional stablecoin on a public blockchain. He pointed to the AUDN stablecoin minted by the National Australia Bank (NAB) on Ethereum in March, which claimed to be the second bank to launch a stablecoin.

Regardless, Berckman expects more banks to follow suit in the months to come, stating that he is “certain” SGF won’t be the last bank to launch a stablecoin on a public network.

Related: Israel’s central bank says CBDC could be issued if stablecoin use increases

SGF’s stablecoin isn’t intended for public use — at least to begin with.

EURCV is only strictly available to institutional clients onboarded by the bank through its Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) procedures, according to the bank’s April 20 announcement.

The stablecoin is designed to bridge the gap between assets in traditional capital markets and the digital assets ecosystem.

A total of 10 million EURCV tokens were minted on Ethereum three days ago according to Ethereum explorer Etherscan. All 10 million tokens are held by one wallet address.

The stablecoin was launched on the back of growing demand for a new settlement asset to process on-chain transactions.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

Brazilian Digital Real Passes Public Blockchain Pilot Test With Flying Colors

Brazilian Digital Real Passes Public Blockchain Pilot Test With Flying ColorsA tokenized version of the digital real, the Brazilian central bank digital currency (CBDC), has passed a public blockchain pilot test successfully. The test, which was carried out by Mercado Bitcoin, a local exchange, using the Stellar network, shows that the digital real token can be used in public blockchains following all compliance rules set […]

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

Vitalik Buterin divulges the ‘largest remaining challenge’ in Ethereum

While the concept of stealth addresses appears complex in theory, Buterin previously described it as a “low-tech approach” compared to other Ethereum privacy solutions.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has shared a possible solution to what he describes as the “largest remaining challenge” on Ethereum — privacy.

In a blog post on Jan. 20, Buterin acknowledged the need to come up with a privacy solution because by default, all information that goes onto a “public blockchain” is public too.

He then arrived at the concept of “stealth addresses” — which he said can potentially anonymize peer-to-peer transactions, nonfungible token (NFT) transfers, and Ethereum Name Service (ENS) registrations, protecting users. 

In the blog post, Buterin explained how on-chain transactions can be carried out between two parties with anonymity. 

Firstly, a user looking to receive assets will generate and keep a “spending key” which is then used to generate a stealth meta-address.

This address — which can be registered on ENS — is then passed onto the sender who can perform a cryptographic computation on the meta-address to generate a stealth address, which belongs to the receiver. 

The sender can then transfer assets to the receiver's stealth address in addition to publishing a temporary key to confirm that the stealth address belongs to the receiver. 

The effect of this is that a new stealth address is generated for each new transaction.

Vitalik Buterin’s stick figure diagram of how a stealth address system may work. Source: Vitalik.ca.

Buterin noted that a "Diffie-Hellman key exchange" in addition to a “key blinding mechanism” would need to be implemented to ensure that the link between the stealth address and the user's meta-address can't be seen publicly.

The Ethereum co-founder added that ZK-SNARKs — a cryptographic-proof technology with built-in privacy features — could transfer funds to pay transaction fees.

However Buterin emphasized that this may lead to problems of its own — at least for the short term — stating “this costs a lot of gas, an extra hundreds of thousands of gas just for a single transfer.”

Related: Crypto privacy is in greater jeopardy than ever before — here's why

Stealth addresses have long been touted as a solution to address on-chain privacy issues, which have been worked on since as early as 2014. However very few solutions have been brought to market thus far.

It also isn’t the first time Buterin has discussed the concept of stealth addresses in Ethereum.

In August 2022, he dubbed stealth addresses as a “low-tech approach” to anonymously transfer ownership of ERC-721 tokens — otherwise known as NFTs.

The Ethereum co-founder explained that the stealth address concept proposed offers privacy differently to that of the now U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC)-sanctioned Tornado Cash:

”Tornado Cash can hide transfers of mainstream fungible assets such as ETH or major ERC20s [...] but it's very weak at adding privacy to transfers of obscure ERC20s, and it cannot add privacy to NFT transfers at all.”

Buterin offered some advice to Web3 projects that are developing a solution:

“Basic stealth addresses can be implemented fairly quickly today, and could be a significant boost to practical user privacy on Ethereum."

"They do require some work on the wallet side to support them. That said, it is my view that wallets should start moving toward a more natively multi-address model [...] for other privacy-related reasons as well," he adde

Buterin suggested that stealth addresses may introduce “longer-term usability concerns,” such as social recovery issues. However, he is confident the problems can be properly addressed over the long-term:

“In the longer term, these problems can be solved, but the stealth address ecosystem of the long term is looking like one that would really heavily depend on zero-knowledge proofs,” he explained.

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

JPMorgan Foresees Increased Blockchain Use in Finance — Prepares to Offer Related Services

JPMorgan Foresees Increased Blockchain Use in Finance — Prepares to Offer Related ServicesJPMorgan expects blockchain use in finance to increase as the crypto sector grows. The global investment bank says, “We want to make sure that we are able to not only support that but also be ready to provide related services.” JPMorgan’s Blockchain Plans JPMorgan Chase & Co foresees increased blockchain usage in traditional finance and […]

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

Private, public and consortium blockchains: The differences explained

There are three main types of blockchain technology: public, private and consortium blockchains, each of which has specific pros, cons and ideal uses.

How does a consortium blockchain work?

The consortium blockchain network is a blockchain in which numerous organizations manage the platform.

Instead of starting from scratch, newcomers might join a consortium and helpt to manage the developed structure and shared data. At the same time, by working together to solve shared challenges, businesses can save money and time on development. 

Finally, the coordination of actions and the sharing of expertise helps to avoid duplication by allowing diverse subjects to share duties rather than duplicate labor.

In a consortium blockchain, there are fewer known participants. It ensures low latency and excellent performance because it is frequently a voting-based system. Every node can write and read transactions, but no one node may add a block. Every node (or supermajority) must confirm that block to do so. The block cannot be added if this rule is not met.

How does a public blockchain work?

The public blockchain network is a blockchain network that anybody can join at any time.

Anyone with internet connectivity can join a blockchain platform and become an authorized node, making public blockchains non-restrictive and permissionless. 

This user has access to current and historical records and the ability to perform mining operations, which are sophisticated calculations required to verify transactions and add them to the ledger. 

No valid record or transaction may be modified on the network, and because the source code is usually open-source, anybody can verify the transactions, uncover errors and offer fixes.

To engage with the public blockchain, each participant creates an account and connects it to a node. Consider it a bank account for sending and receiving money. Wallets are software applications that store accounts.

The decision to add a transaction to the chain on a public blockchain is decided by consensus. This means that the transaction must be accepted by the majority of "nodes" (or computers in the network). The people who own the machines in the network are rewarded for confirming transactions. “Proof-of-work (PoW)” is the term for this procedure.

How does a private blockchain work?

A private blockchain is a sort of blockchain technology in which a single entity controls the network.

The entire network is shared by the coalition of organizations in a private permissioned blockchain. The network operator can set up user and node permissions and roles, such as who can participate in the consensus process, who can read and write to the ledger and how blockchain nodes are distributed around the network.

Steps involved in the working of a private blockchain network:

  • Users of the network and their rights are not equal and are determined by their role in the consortium.
  • Different categories of data can only be accessed by users who have been granted authorization. 
  • The technique of access is determined by the network participants' regulations.

Is Bitcoin a public or a private blockchain?

Bitcoin is a public blockchain that anybody can observe and use because it is built with open source computing codes.

While private blockchains do not allow for anonymity, the Bitcoin blockchain does. Anyone, for example, can purchase and trade Bitcoin without revealing their name. It ensures that everyone is treated equally.

Because of Bitcoin's decentralized nature, all transactions can be monitored transparently via a personal node or blockchain explorers, which allow anybody to witness transactions as they happen in real-time.

Each node maintains its copy of the chain, which is updated as new blocks are confirmed. This means that if you wanted to, you could follow Bitcoin wherever it went.

What is a consortium blockchain?

A consortium blockchain is a hybrid form of public and private blockchains.

The consortium blockchain straddles the line between public and private chains, incorporating aspects of both. The most noticeable difference between the two systems may be found at the level of unanimity. 

Instead of an open system in which anybody can validate blocks or a closed system in which only a single party selects block producers, a consortium chain employs a small number of equally powerful parties as validators.

A consortium blockchain would be most useful in a situation when several companies operate in the same industry and need a single platform to conduct transactions or transmit information. Consortium blockchains Quorum and Corda are two examples.

Compared to a public blockchain network, a consortium blockchain is more secure, scalable and efficient. It also has access controls, just like private blockchain. However, a consortium blockchain is less transparent. It can still be hacked if a member node is compromised, and the blockchain's own rules can make the network unusable.

What is the difference between private vs public blockchain?

In every asset trade scenario, a blockchain was created to take out the intermediary securely. To some extent, a private blockchain allows the middleman to re-enter the picture. 

Anyone can participate in a public blockchain by verifying and uploading data to it. Only approved entities can participate in and control the network in private blockchains. Public blockchain examples include Bitcoin and Ethereum. A public blockchain is more decentralized than a private or centralized blockchain. Private blockchain examples include Hyperledger and Ripple.

When contrasted with private blockchains, public blockchains have fewer transactions per second. A private blockchain may handle hundreds or even thousands of transactions per second because the number of authorized users is more diminutive.

Because of its decentralization and active engagement, a public network is more secure. It is practically impossible for “bad actors” to assault the system and obtain control of the consensus network due to the increased number of nodes in the network. A private blockchain is more vulnerable to hacks, hazards and data breaches/manipulation than a public blockchain. It is simple for bad actors to put the entire network at risk.

Because it requires a large number of electrical resources to run and reach network consensus, a public blockchain consumes more energy than a private blockchain. Private blockchains use a lot less energy and electricity than public blockchains.

Minor collisions are impossible in a private blockchain. Each validator is identified and has the necessary credentials to join the network. However, no one knows who each validator is in a public blockchain, which increases the possibility of collusion or a 51% attack.

What is a public blockchain?

Anyone can participate and be rewarded for their contribution to attaining consensus in a public blockchain.

Anyone can join and participate in a public blockchain network because it is entirely open. To attract more people to join the network, the network usually has an incentive system. Bitcoin is one of the most widely used public blockchain networks today.

One of the disadvantages of a public blockchain is the vast amount of processing power required to keep a distributed ledger running at a wide scale. To obtain consensus, each node in a network must solve a sophisticated, resource-intensive cryptographic challenge known as proof-of-work (PoW) to ensure everyone is on the same page.

Another problem of a public blockchain is its openness, which implies minor to no transaction privacy and only supports a rudimentary idea of security.

What is a private blockchain?

Private blockchains provide users with the absolute privacy they desire.

Private blockchains (which are permissioned settings) establish rules governing who can see and write to the chain, in contrast to public, permissionless blockchains. There is a clear hierarchy of control in these systems; hence, they are not decentralized. However, they are dispersed because many nodes still keep a copy of the chain on their machines.

A private blockchain network requires an invitation, which must be approved by the network founder or a set of rules established by the network starter. Businesses that create a private blockchain typically do it on a permissioned network. This limits who is authorized to engage in the network and for which specific transactions. Participants must first get an invitation or authorization.

Existing participants could decide on prospective entrants; a regulatory authority could issue participation licenses, or a consortium could decide. Once a company joins the network, it will help to keep the blockchain running in a decentralized fashion.

This type of permissioned blockchain paradigm allows users to take advantage of more than 30 years of technical literature to get considerable benefits. 

Private chains are better suited to enterprise settings when a company wants to benefit from blockchain qualities without exposing its network to the public. Digital identification, dealing with supply chain issues, disrupting the banking sector, or facilitating secure patient/provider data exchanges in healthcare are some of the use-cases of private blockchains. The Linux Foundation's Hyperledger Fabric is an excellent example of a private blockchain.

The contentious assertion that private blockchains aren't actual blockchains, given that the underlying principle of blockchain is decentralization, is one of the disadvantages of private blockchains.

Because centralized nodes determine what is valid, it is also more challenging to build information truthfully in a private blockchain. A minimal number of nodes can also imply a lower level of security. The consensus mechanism can be jeopardized if a few nodes go rogue.

Furthermore, private blockchain source code is frequently proprietary and locked. Users are unable to independently verify or check it, which may result in a reduction in security. On a private blockchain, there is no anonymity.

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem

Société Générale Launches Blockchain-Based Structured Product

Société Générale Launches Blockchain-Based Structured ProductFrench financial services giant Société Générale has issued security tokens on Tezos’ public blockchain as part of its ongoing experimentation with cutting-edge fintech applications. Latest Move Reflects Bank’s Efforts to Fold Cryptocurrency Operations Into Its Ecosystem In its latest milestone in the blockchain arena, French multinational bank Société Générale has issued its very first structured […]

HTX DAO’s “Confidence Journey” Second Stop a Success: Partnering with DOGE Community to Build an Open and Inclusive Crypto Ecosystem