1. Home
  2. registration

registration

UK Stands Firm on Tough Crypto Regulations, Warns Against Lowering Crypto Standards

UK Stands Firm on Tough Crypto Regulations, Warns Against Lowering Crypto StandardsA Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) official has emphasized the importance of high regulatory standards for crypto asset registrations. She defended the UK’s stringent rules, aiming to protect consumers and financial markets while fostering a competitive crypto sector. The regulator warned against relaxing standards, advocating instead for collaboration to build a secure foundation for sustainable innovation […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

SEC Charges Cumberland DRW for Unregistered $2 Billion Crypto Securities Dealings

SEC Charges Cumberland DRW for Unregistered  Billion Crypto Securities DealingsThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Cumberland DRW LLC, a Chicago-based firm, for operating as an unregistered dealer in over $2 billion of crypto assets classified as securities. The SEC claims that Cumberland violated federal securities laws by failing to register, raising concerns over investor protection. The charges seek injunctive relief and […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

SEC Hits Flyfish Club With Charges for Unregistered NFT Offering

SEC Hits Flyfish Club With Charges for Unregistered NFT OfferingThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Flyfish Club for conducting an unregistered offering of crypto asset securities through non-fungible tokens (NFTs), raising $14.8 million for an exclusive restaurant project. “Flyfish agreed to a cease-and-desist order, to pay a $750,000 civil penalty, and to comply with certain undertakings,” the regulator noted. SEC Charges […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

UK Regulator: 87% of Crypto Firms Fail to Meet Registration Requirements

UK Regulator: 87% of Crypto Firms Fail to Meet Registration RequirementsThe UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has revealed that over 87% of crypto registrations were either rejected, withdrawn, or refused as part of its ongoing efforts to combat fraud and enhance consumer protection. In its annual report, the FCA outlined new marketing rules for crypto assets. The regulator issued 450 consumer alerts against illegal crypto […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

Makerdao Co-Founder Rune Christensen: Defi Frontends Might Need Licenses to Operate in Europe

Makerdao Co-Founder Rune Christensen: Defi Frontends Might Need Licenses to Operate in EuropeRune Christensen, a co-founder of the Makerdao project, has warned about the possible disruptions linked to hypothetical EU-wide requirements for defi fronteds to receive a license for operating. Christensen said this would decelerate the EU to the Stone Age, disrupting European defi access for less tech-savvy users. Makerdao Co-Founder Details Possible MiCA Disruptions in EU-Based […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

Mark Cuban, John Reed Stark clash over the cause of FTX’s collapse

Mark Cuban thinks the SEC could have saved U.S. customers from FTX had it adopted Japan’s approach to crypto regulation, but John Reed Stark disagrees.

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban has again locked horns with former securities chief John Reed Stark, this time over who was ultimately to blame for FTX’s collapse and the impact on creditors.

During a heated back-and-forth exchange, Cuban argued had the United States Securities and Exchange Commission set “clear regulations,” no one would have lost money from its collapse.

Stark earlier suggested cryptocurrency and stablecoins — including central bank digital currencies — solve no problems and that the crypto industry operates without regulatory oversight, consumer protections and audits, among other things.

Cuban argued that Japanese regulators — an increasingly Web3 friendly jurisdiction — are an example of a regulator that has done it right.

“When FTX crashed, NO ONE IN FTX JAPAN LOST MONEY,” he said.

Stark — a cryptocurrency skeptic — shot back, saying it “seems a bit of a stretch”  to blame the SEC for the collapses of FTX, BlockFi, Celsius, Terra and Voyager, or what he called “dumpster fires.”

While Stark conceded that the SEC isn’t always right, he claimed the regulator saved investors “millions, perhaps even billions” in crypto losses.

The ex-SEC official claimed while the cryptocurrency industry seeks regulatory clarity, whenever rules are promulgated or proposed, “the crypto industry cries foul” and often responds by filing a “flashy legal challenge to its enactment.”

Cuban hit back, explaining the “best way” to prevent cryptocurrency fraud is to implement “brightline investor protection regulations.” He added:

“Anyone who doesn't register is de-facto in violation, can't operate and will be shut down. That's how you protect crypto investors.”

Stark, however, claims that the SEC only charged the likes of Binance, Coinbase, Beaxy and Bittrex months after the regulator made it clear that those firms were not in compliance.

Related: Lawmakers are wrong to target Gary Gensler

“[These firms] opted to ignore the SEC — and reap profits for as long as possible without registering,” Stark added.

It is the second time in three weeks that the pair have clashed over how cryptocurrency should be regulated.

On June 11, Cuban called out the SEC for purportedly failing to provide cryptocurrency firms with a clear registration process.

He claimed it’s “near impossible to know” what constitutes security because the SEC’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” document fails to explain how cryptocurrency firms can come into compliance.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

Binance Netherlands exit — Dutch central bank says registration failings are confidential

De Nederlandsche Bank cannot share details of Binance’s registration failings in the country due to the confidentiality requirements of its supervisory laws.

The details behind Binance’s failed efforts to register for a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license in the Netherlands remain unclear due to the confidentiality requirements of the Dutch central bank’s supervisory laws.

On June 16, Binance announced it would terminate its services in the Netherlands with immediate effect, having failed to get the all-clear from De Nederlandse Bank (DNB). From July 17, Dutch customers will only be able to withdraw assets from the platform, while trading and deposits were stopped on the date of the announcement.

Binance claimed it had undergone a “comprehensive registration application process” to obtain a VASP license in the Netherlands and explored “alternative avenues” to serve Dutch residents in the country. The exchange indicated that it would continue its effort to obtain authorization to provide its services and products in the country.

Cointelegraph reached out to Tobias Oudejans, DNB press officer for supervision, fintech, cryptocurrencies, resolution and payment systems, to ascertain the final details of Binance’s failed registration efforts.

Oudejans said the central bank could not share more details about Binance’s registration due to legal requirements of supervisory laws:

“Because of confidentiality as demanded by our supervisory laws, we cannot elaborate on anything concerning our supervision on individual institutions or the possible licensing trajectories they may be in.”

Oudejans added that the DNB wanted to stress that its perceived silence over this specific supervisory outcome and similar issues ‘might wrongly be attributed to an unwillingness to comment,’ but was necessitated by Dutch laws.

Binance would have joined a list of 35 VASP that have completed registration with the DNB. This includes the likes of Coinbase Custody International Limited, Coinbase Europe Limited, eToro (Europe) Limited, BitPay and Bitstamp.

Related: EU’s new crypto law: How MiCA can make Europe a digital asset hub

Oudejans said VASP registration requirements in the Netherlands are in line with the similar requirements for other types of financial institutions under the DNB’s supervision. These are based on the Netherlands Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act, locally known as the Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme (WWFT).

The implementation of the European Union’s recently published Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) could provide Binance an alternative avenue to operate in the Netherlands come 2024. As Oudejans explained, the global exchange could gain access to the Dutch market if it has met the necessary requirements in other EU member states:

“It is not yet clear in what way MiCA will be implemented in the Netherlands, but indeed it looks like it will be a different law than the WWFT and possibly on a European level there may be access to the Dutch market for registered entities from other EU-countries.”

Binance has already indicated that it is ramping up efforts to be fully compliant with the new EU rules set out in MiCAR. 

Binance was handed a $3.6 million (3.3 mln euro) by the DNB in July 2022 for operating without clearance in the Netherlands. 

Meanwhile Coinbase obtained a green light from the DNB in September 2022 as it began to explore expansion away from the United States and into Europe. The U.S. exchange is embroiled in a high-profile legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations that it has been operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker and clearing agency.

Magazine: Opinion: GOP crypto maxis almost as bad as Dems’ ‘anti-crypto army’

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

‘Near impossible to know’ what is and isn’t a security: Mark Cuban on SEC

The billionaire is the latest to argue that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission hasn’t provided crypto firms with a registration process to follow.

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban has become one of the latest industry figures to call out the United States securities regulator for purportedly failing to provide cryptocurrency firms with a clear registration process.

The Shark Tank investor claimed in a June 11 tweet that no registration exists in the SEC’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” document, making it “near impossible to know” what constitutes a security in the “crypto universe.”

“Unfortunately none of the elements presented in this page are part of the registration process. Which makes it near impossible to know, with or without an army of securities lawyers, what is or is not a security in the crypto universe.”

While a step-by-step outline isn’t provided, the document does briefly explain what is required for firms pursuant to U.S. federal securities laws.

Among the requirements included the need to disclose all information necessary for investors to make “informed investment decisions” and other “essential managerial efforts” that impact the success of the enterprise.

Meanwhile, Cuban noted that other sectors in the finance industry are receiving much more transparency from the SEC. Rather than labeling “stock loans” as securities or suing brokers and banks, they’re engaging in a “comments process,” Cuban explained.

“They should do the same thing with crypto as an effort to determine which aspects of crypto are securities and which are not,” he added.

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis has also lashed out at the regulator for failing to provide a “robust legal framework” or at least offer “legal guidance” in some form for firms to comply with:

Last week, SEC Chair Gary Gensler claimed at the Global Exchange & Fintech Conference on June 8 that a registration process exists and that firms “know how to register.”

His comments were made in relation to Coinbase and Robinhood’s recent claims that they tried to register but the SEC rejected the attempt.

Related: SEC steps back from defining digital assets in new hedge fund rules

The SEC sued Binance on June 5 and Coinbase on June 6, alleging the exchanges broke various securities rules, most notably for purportedly offering cryptocurrencies that the regulator considers to be unregistered securities.

A total of 68 cryptocurrencies are now considered to be securities by the SEC.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

Crypto Exchanges Must Share User Data With Russia, Prosecutor General Demands

Crypto Exchanges Must Share User Data With Russia, Prosecutor General DemandsDigital asset exchanges must be obliged to provide user information to Russia’s law enforcement agencies, the country’s Prosecutor General has insisted. The circulation of cryptocurrencies in the Russian Federation needs to be regulated to counter money laundering, the official added. Cryptocurrency Exchanges Have to Report to Russian Authorities, Chief Prosecutor Says Crypto service providers should […]

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

What are the Howey test and its implications for cryptocurrency?

The Howey test’s impact on cryptocurrency, explained — legal implications, compliance requirements and more.

What is the Howey test?

The Howey test is a legal test used in the United States to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. The test was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. (1946), and it has since been applied in numerous cases to determine whether various financial arrangements and offerings constitute securities. 

According to the Howey test, a transaction must contain an investment of funds in a group venture with the expectation that all gains will come from group efforts. A transaction is deemed a security if it satisfies these requirements, in which case it is subject to federal securities laws and regulations.

Understanding the criteria for a security

The test involves three key criteria that must be met in order for a transaction to qualify as a security, as discussed below:

The first criterion is a financial investment, which means that participants in the transaction must be risking their own money. This comprises both financial and in-kind investments.

The second requirement is a shared enterprise, which denotes that the financial success of the investors is somehow connected. This can be proven by providing evidence of the investors’ resource pooling or reliance on a third party to manage their investments.

The third criterion is an expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others, which means that the investors are relying on someone else to generate a return on their investment. This could include, for example, profits generated by a third-party manager or profits generated by the efforts of a particular group or organization.

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency: Is it a security or not?

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency are significant, as the test provides a framework for determining whether a particular cryptocurrency offering should be classified as a security under U.S. law. If a cryptocurrency offering meets the criteria outlined in the Howey test, it may be considered a security and subject to federal securities laws.

This has important ramifications for crypto businesses and investors since breaking federal securities laws can result in penalties, legal action and reputational harm to the business. To make sure they are in compliance with federal securities laws, cryptocurrency companies should carefully consider the Howey test before creating their offerings.

Related: Crypto and securities: New interpretation of US Howey test gaining ground

Tokens that do not pass the Howey test are considered utility tokens that provide investors with access to a future product or service or can be redeemed for discounted fees. While utility tokens are typically not considered securities, the SEC has suggested that the presence of a utility token framework does not necessarily mean that a project is exempt from being classified as a security.

Ultimately, the implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency will depend on how regulators choose to apply the test in practice and how cryptocurrency companies choose to structure their offerings to comply with federal securities law.

Compliance with federal securities laws: What cryptocurrency companies need to know

Cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of the federal securities laws in the United States to ensure compliance with them. Here are some key things to keep in mind:

  • Securities laws apply to cryptocurrencies: Several cryptocurrencies are seen as securities by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This implies that cryptocurrency businesses must abide by federal securities laws, including the requirements for registration and disclosure.
  • Token offerings may be subject to securities laws: It can count as a securities offering if a cryptocurrency company sells tokens to the general public in return for cash or other assets. As a result, the business would have to adhere to securities rules, which would include registering the offering with the SEC.
  • The use of funds must be disclosed: A cryptocurrency company must state its financial goals when raising money through a securities offering. The business must also keep investors informed about how the money is being used.
  • Trading platforms may be subject to securities laws: Exchanges for securities may include cryptocurrency trading platforms that let users purchase and sell tokens. If so, the platform would have to file an SEC registration form and adhere to other securities regulations.
  • Penalties for non-compliance can be severe: Significant penalties may be imposed for non-compliance: A cryptocurrency corporation might incur severe consequences, such as fines and legal action if it violates federal securities regulations.

Therefore, cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of and comply with federal securities laws in the United States. This includes understanding whether their tokens are considered securities, disclosing the use of funds, and complying with registration and disclosure requirements.

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance