1. Home
  2. regulatory clarity

regulatory clarity

Animoca’s Yat Siu bullish on TON partnership as Bitcoin sets strong foundation for 2024

Animoca Brands became the biggest validator of the TON blockchain in 2023, banking on the network effect of Telegram’s 800 million users to drive GameFi adoption.

Animoca Brands co-founder Yat Siu is confident that a number of investments and partnerships could prove fruitful in 2024 as mainstream institutional interest in Bitcoin (BTC) gathers steam.

Speaking exclusively to Cointelegraph at the Next Block Expo event in Berlin, the chairman of the gaming venture capital firm highlights some 70 investments made in 2023 that are expected to deliver results next year.

Related: Animoca eyes SportFi ecosystem, becomes Chiliz Chain validator

Chief among these is a high-profile partnership with The Open Network (TON) blockchain, which was announced on Nov.

“We actually think that’s a tool for mass onboarding with TON wallet. What’s not to be excited about?”

Siu also said that Animoca’s acquisition of the social casual gaming platform Gamee in July 2020 is set to capitalize on its growing presence as a gaming platform on Telegram.

“There were no advertising and in-app purchases, and nothing was allowed in Telegram until recently with the integration of TON.

Animoca Brands co-founder Yat Siu gives an overview of the GameFi ecosystem during a keynote speech at the Next Block Expo in Berlin.

Read more

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

China to gain most from restrictive US crypto regulations: Coinbase CEO

The Coinbase CEO has been hugely critical of the U.S. failure to provide the crypto industry with regulatory clarity and has long argued it will push firms offshore.

“Adversary nations” like China could ultimately benefit from restrictive crypto policies in the United States, warns Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. 

In a May 30 op-ed for MarketWatch, Armstrong again warned that while recent turbulence in crypto markets might tempt U.S. policymakers “to write it off as an unstable asset class,” doing so could see the U.S. cede its status as a financial leader and innovation hub.

Armstrong urged policymakers to see that crypto is “about much more than individual transactions,” but represents a “transformative technology” that can revolutionize a variety of sectors — highlighting its ability to provide creators with royalties for secondary market transactions as an example and adding:

“Crypto, like the internet before it, has the potential to modernize finance and numerous other sectors, from supply chains to social media, by offering a faster, cheaper, more private, and accessible platform.”

Through his status as a public figure and head of Coinbase, Armstrong has long been pushing for U.S. policymakers to provide the crypto industry with regulatory clarity that can help realize crypto’s potential whilst protecting consumers.

Coinbase has continued to ask for clarity from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission around which digital assets qualify as securities and has argued against the agency’s “regulation by enforcement” approach. SEC chair Gary Gensler has previously argued that digital assets already fall under existing securities regulations.

Related: SEC settles case against Wahi brothers for Coinbase insider trading

In the op-ed, Armstrong added it was unsurprising that Hong Kong is positioning itself to be a global crypto hub, as China looks to challenge the U.S.’s role as the global financial leader in a variety of ways — such as the recent launch of the digital yuan and Belt and Road Initiatives.

He warned that failing to pass comprehensive crypto legislation would result in the U.S. needing to play catch-up and spend billions to bring innovation back to the U.S., but noted that even with a “colossal and sustained effort” it might be too late by then.

Crypto City: Guide to Osaka, Japan’s second-biggest city

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Where crypto can grow: Digital asset regulations around the world

While many countries have sped up their efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies following a crisis-filled 2022, most still lack a clear framework for the industry to build around.

As cryptocurrencies continue to become a bigger part of the global economy, more and more governments are exploring ways to regulate the industry and construct rules for firms operating in the space.

There have been some significant regulatory developments in recent weeks, with the European Parliament approving the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations on April 20, Ukraine announcing it would adopt the same set of rules, and South Korea making progress with its proposed regulations.

The collapse of crypto exchange FTX has led to calls for fast-tracked regulations in numerous countries, with its bankruptcy resulting in a contagion that contributed to the downfall of many firms it associated with.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, chairman and co-founder of Animoca Brands Yat Siu noted that his firm is “very pro-regulation, as that provides a framework that legitimizes the industry.” Sui said that a lack of regulatory clarity could have the opposite effect and create uncertainty, adding:

“Broadly speaking, regulation has seen a much more positive direction in places like Hong Kong, Japan, UAE, and even parts of Europe compared to the U.S., which has attracted capital, talent and jobs in those places.”

Below is a breakdown of crypto regulations in different countries worldwide and whether they provide clear rules for a cryptocurrency industry to be built around, if they are hostile toward crypto firms, or if they lack clear regulations.

This is not a definitive list but aims to cover many of the largest countries by gross domestic product and those with unique rules. Most European Union member states are not included, with many likely to adopt the incoming MiCA regulations.

Regulations can be highly nuanced, so attempts to categorize different countries’ regulations may be an oversimplification.

Countries or regions with clear regulations

Bahamas: The Bahamas has become desirable for crypto firms’ headquarters due to its friendly tax policies and transparent regulatory framework. FTX was headquartered there, and Coinbase is reportedly set to create a derivatives exchange there.

Brazil: Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro signed a crypto bill into law on Dec. 22, 2022, which legalized using crypto as a payment method and established a licensing regime for virtual asset service providers.

Canada: The first country to approve a Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund; Canada requires all crypto trading platforms to register with regulators and, for the most part, has clear regulations that individuals and businesses must follow.

Cayman Islands: Similar to the Bahamas, the Cayman Islands has a clear regulatory framework and friendly tax policies, making it a preferred location for many crypto firms.

El Salvador: The first country to recognize Bitcoin (BTC) as legal tender; it has fully embraced crypto and plans to create a “Bitcoin City,” which will provide residents with tax benefits. The country has even paved the way for Bitcoin-backed bonds.

Japan: Japan’s clear regulatory framework places strict standards on crypto exchanges, including a requirement to segregate exchange and customer assets, which meant that customers of FTX Japan could fully withdraw all their funds following the collapse of its parent company.

Mexico: Mexico’s central bank has broad powers enabling it to regulate virtual assets following laws passed in 2018 outlining the requirements for firms operating in the crypto industry.

Switzerland: While Switzerland has strict laws regarding Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer requirements, its regulatory framework is clear and provides its crypto industry with clear guidelines on how it must operate.

Countries that are hostile toward crypto

Afghanistan: After the Taliban came to power, it banned cryptocurrency trading in August 2022.

Algeria: The purchase, use, sale and holding of crypto has been prohibited in Algeria since 2017.

Bangladesh: Although Bangladesh has indicated a desire to become a “Blockchain-enabled Nation,” transacting with crypto is illegal.

Bolivia: The Central Bank of Bolivia issued a resolution to ban the use of crypto in 2014.

China: China banned local crypto exchanges in 2017, progressing to a blanket ban on mining and cryptocurrency use in 2021.

Egypt: Crypto transactions in Egypt have been prohibited since 2018, but the nation appears to be warming to crypto following reports earlier this year that it was looking at creating its own regulatory framework for crypto.

Morocco: Transacting with crypto has been illegal in Morocco since 2017.

Nepal: Nepal has outright banned any use of crypto in the country and, earlier this year, told internet service providers and email service providers to prevent access to “websites, apps, or online networks” related to crypto.

Countries that lack a clear regulatory framework

Australia: Australia’s lack of clear regulations has left consumers heavily exposed to industry-wide events such as the collapse of FTX, but it is currently making progress on establishing broad regulations as it engages in a public consultation on how to classify crypto and firms operating in the space.

Hong Kong: Hong Kong has been quickly progressing in its efforts to regulate crypto and become a crypto hub but still lacks clear regulations. It is set to release crypto exchange licensing guidelines next month, with its courts also recently recognizing crypto assets as property.

India: While India has imposed AML rules on crypto, it lacks clear regulations for the crypto industry and recorded huge drops in crypto exchange activity after putting in place hefty taxation laws in 2022. The Reserve Bank of India banned cryptocurrency in 2018, but the supreme court lifted the ban in 2020.

Magazine: Whatever happened to EOS? Community shoots for unlikely comeback

Russia: While there are reports that Russia may adopt crypto regulations as early as June, it currently does not have a clear regulatory framework and has previously banned using cryptocurrencies for commerce.

South Korea: South Korea has some crypto regulations and is close to passing its own sweeping crypto bill, which would require crypto exchanges and service providers to segregate customer and business funds, among other measures.

United Kingdom: While the U.K.’s financial regulator — the Financial Conduct Authority — has recently called upon the crypto industry to work with it as it develops its own regulatory framework, it currently has limited powers to regulate the sector and has said that firms will have four months to implement changes required by the rules when they come into force.

United States: Although the U.S. still has the most crypto-related development and a high proportion of crypto users, it lacks a clear regulatory framework that some argue drives firms offshore.

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

SEC Charges Crypto Exchange Bittrex With Operating Unregistered Exchange, Broker, and Clearing Agency

SEC Charges Crypto Exchange Bittrex With Operating Unregistered Exchange, Broker, and Clearing AgencyAfter the report revealing that the cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex had received a Wells Notice from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the securities regulator charged Bittrex and the company’s CEO on April 17 for “operating an unregistered exchange, broker, and clearing agency.” Following the Wells Notice, SEC Charges Bittrex for Violating Federal Laws On […]

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Bittrex Receives Wells Notice From SEC for Alleged Investor-Protection Law Violations

Bittrex Receives Wells Notice From SEC for Alleged Investor-Protection Law ViolationsAccording to a recent report, the cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex received a Wells notice from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in March, signaling a potential lawsuit. The SEC’s enforcement division sent the Wells notice prior to Bittrex deciding to wind down its operations in the United States. ‘Lack of Regulatory Clarity’ in the U.S. […]

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Crypto VC funding hits 2-year low, US firms still favorite: Galaxy Research

Despite macroeconomic headwinds, a Galaxy Research report says activity could rebound in the second quarter of 2023 following recent crypto price increases.

Venture capitalist (VC) investment into crypto firms continued to fall in the first quarter of 2023, yet despite the current regulatory turbulence for crypto in the United States, it is still first for the number of firms raising capital according to a new report.

An April 11 report from Galaxy Research, the research arm of crypto investment firm Galaxy Digital, said the $2.4 billion invested by VCs throughout Q1 2023 was the lowest sum invested since the last quarter of 2020.

VC investments have been falling since peaking at nearly $13 billion in Q1 2022, with the latest quarter's results representing a decline of over 80% compared to the same ti last year.

The report noted that data on venture deals is often reported at a later time, meaning the $2.4 billion figure quoted may be revised in the future.

While capital investment has fallen since Q4 2022, the report noted the number of deals made had actually increased by nearly 20% and theorized an apparent correlation between crypto prices and capital invested could see VC activity rebound following strong price gains late in the first quarter.

Related: Metalpha raising $100M to offer Grayscale Bitcoin products in Hong Kong

While various statistics and anecdotal evidence suggest crypto firms are leaving the U.S. to find greener pastures — citing factors such as regulatory clarity and friendlier tax policies — Galaxy found that U.S.-based companies raised 42.8% of the VC money flowing into crypto in Q1 2023 with the next closest being France at 19.4%.

Capital investments for crypto firms throughout the first quarter of 2023 by country. Source: Galaxy Digital

While Galaxy’s report has included the jurisdictions of investments since the third quarter of 2022, the U.S. share of crypto VC investment has fallen by only 2.8 percentage points since then.

France appears to be the biggest winner, with capital investments for France-based crypto firms jumping to 19.4% in the latest quarter from less than 5% in the third quarter of 2022.

Hodler's Digest, April 2-8: BTC white paper hidden on macOS, Binance loses AUS license and DOGE news

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Dear Ripple, Don’t Settle: Embrace the Opportunity to Shape Crypto’s Future

Dear Ripple, Don’t Settle: Embrace the Opportunity to Shape Crypto’s FutureAs Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) persist in their legal dispute over XRP’s classification as a security, the consequences for both parties and the wider cryptocurrency market cannot be understated. This case offers a unique opportunity to attain much-needed regulatory clarity, which could ultimately promote growth and stability throughout the sector. […]

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Coinbase staking ‘fundamentally different’ to Kraken’s — chief lawyer

After the SEC’s crack-down on Kraken, Coinbase’s legal head outlined the differences between Kraken’s staking product and its own.

The staking services offered by cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase are “fundamentally different” to what was offered by its peer exchange Kraken — which recently came under fire from the United States securities regulator — according to Coinbase's head lawyer.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, made the comments in his response to a shareholder question regarding its staking services during a Q&A session on the exchange’s fourth-quarter results, noting:

“The staking products that we offer on Coinbase are fundamentally different from the yield products that were described in the reinforcement action against Kraken. The differences matter.”

The first point of difference Grewal highlighted was that Coinbase users retain ownership of their cryptocurrencies at all times.

In its user agreement last updated Dec. 15, 2022, Coinbase states that it merely “facilitate[s] the staking of those assets on your behalf,” but may not replace any Ether (ETH) lost to slashing — which refers to the blockchain's mechanism for punishing bad behavior by reducing a validator’s tokens.

Grewal also suggested that another difference was its customers have a “right to the return,” with the firm unable to “simply just decide not to pay any returns at all.”

He pointed to the exchange's registration as a publicly-traded company as another critical point of difference, which enables customers to have “deep transparent insight into our financials.”

In comparison, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) complaint against Kraken alleged its users lost control of their tokens by offering them to Kraken's staking program and investors were offered "outsized returns untethered to any economic realities" with Kraken also able to pay "no returns at all.”

Grewal however reiterated calls for regulatory clarity on staking services in the U.S. suggesting the SEC was outlining their expectations in court complaints rather than through clear regulations, noting:

“Rules making clear these distinctions would provide very real clarity and we think the public shouldn't have to parse complaints in federal court in order to understand what a regulator expects.”

Related: Coinbase beats Q4 earnings estimates amid falling transaction volume

In a Feb. 13 tweet, Grewal had opined that staking in itself was not a security transaction, using an analogy of harvesting oranges to elaborate on his position.

On the back of SEC Chair Gary Gensler calling on firms to register products with the regulator, Grewal indicated that Coinbase has no issues registering products with the SEC where “appropriate,” but added:

“I think it's fair to say that at this point in time, the path to registration for products and services that may qualify as securities has not been open, or at least readily or easily open.”

Coinbase is currently facing an SEC investigation into its products similar to the one that resulted in Kraken settling with the regulator for $30 million and being prohibited from offering staking services to its U.S. clients.

Coinbase intends to put up a fight, however, with CEO and co-founder, Brian Armstrong, suggesting the company would be willing to challenge the regulator and take the matter to court.

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Custodia CEO Slams US Government Over Broad Crackdown, Lack of Regulatory Clarity in Crypto Industry

Custodia CEO Slams US Government Over Broad Crackdown, Lack of Regulatory Clarity in Crypto IndustryCaitlin Long, CEO of crypto bank Custodia, criticized the U.S. government for its handling of a massive crypto fraud that occurred months before the company’s collapse. She made her remarks in a blog post after disclosing evidence to law enforcement. Long’s post followed Custodia’s unsuccessful application to become a member of the Federal Reserve System, […]

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains

Getting rid of crypto staking would be a ‘terrible path’ for the US — Coinbase CEO

Banning retail crypto staking in the US would result in even more businesses moving offshore, argues the Coinbase co-founder.

The CEO and co-founder of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, believes that banning retail crypto staking in the United States would be a ‘terrible’ move by the country's regulators. 

Armstrong made the comments in a Feb. 9 Twitter thread which has already been viewed over 2.2 million times, after noting they've heard “rumors” that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission “would like to get rid of crypto staking” for retail customers.

“I hope that's not the case as I believe it would be a terrible path for the U.S. if that was allowed to happen.”

Armstrong did not share where the rumors originated from but continued to note that staking was “a really important innovation in crypto.”

“Staking brings many positive improvements to the space, including scalability, increased security, and reduced carbon footprints,” he added.

Armstrong also referenced an Oct. 5 blog post from crypto investment firm Paradigm, which argued that Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake and its subsequent “staking” model does not make it a security.

The Paradigm post came just a few weeks after SEC Chairman Gary Gensler suggested that proof-of-stake (PoS) cryptocurrencies could trigger securities laws on Sep. 15, 2022, while speaking to reporters after a Senate Banking Committee meeting.

Armstrong also lambasted the current lack of regulatory clarity in the U.S. and subsequent “regulation by enforcement” that he says is driving companies offshore, such as crypto exchange FTX.

He has reiterated calls for regulation that provides clear rules for the industry while preserving innovation.

Related: Crypto exchange Kraken faces probe over possible securities violations: Report

According to Staking Rewards, the top four staked cryptocurrencies by market cap account for over $55 billion in staked assets, suggesting a country-wide ban would be a huge hit to the country’s crypto industry which has already seen an exodus of crypto-related businesses.

Top crypto assets by staking market cap. Source: Staking Rewards.

Some industry commentators have suggested that the SEC might go after centralized parties which offer staking services rather than the technology itself, believing the latter would be a losing battle which would “crush them in precedent.”

The general counsel for Delphi Digital’s research and development arm, Gabriel Shapiro, suggested there is a strong argument that staking services provided by centralized exchanges like Coinbase constitute a security, drawing parallels between them and other “Earn” products.

Coinbase is currently subject to an ongoing SEC probe, which Coinbase revealed in an Aug. 9, 2022 SEC filing was in relation to its staking rewards amongst other offerings.

Solana Co-Founder Says Cosmos and One SOL Rival Are Clear Winners in Building Sovereign Blockchains