Source: Crypto Briefing Go to Source Author: Stefan Stankovic
RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub has proposed a pilot program for “Docklands DAO” that will help Melbourne precincts recover from the pandemic.
The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology’s (RMIT) Blockchain Innovation Hub has released a report proposing the implementation of pilot Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), to assist specific precincts in Melbourne’s CBD in recovering from the impacts of the pandemic.
The report, which is part of a five-piece series of reports funded by the Victorian Government in Australia, details how blockchain technology — specifically DAOs — can be used to help cities like Melbourne recover from a lack of economic activity during the pandemic and to survive into the future with the likely persistence of hybrid working arrangements.
Created in consultation with the City of Melbourne, the state government and local businesses, the report outlines a detailed and actionable plan for a DAO pilot program called the “Docklands DAO” which would be implemented in the Docklands precinct of the Melbourne CBD.
The report’s author is Blockchain Innovation Hub researcher Dr Max Parasol — also a contributor to Cointelegraph Magazine.
He told Cointelegraph that DAOs offer cities an innovative way to utilize anonymously pooled data to optimize resource allocation, increase overall efficiency, and create opportunities for strategic placemaking (collectively reimagining and reinventing public spaces.)
A DAO is an crowd sourced entity governed by token holders and organized around a specific set of rules enforced on a blockchain.
“DAOs incentivize participation, so those who work for the DAO will get more governance capability and so on… ultimately the community gets to decide the governance mechanisms,” Parasol said.
DAOs have witnessed a rapid global uptake as the technology becomes increasingly utilized by an increasingly wide array of organizations seeking to explore the possibilities offered by the blockchain-based digital voting mechanisms.
At the end of 2021 more than 1.6 million people were involved in a DAO at some level, a colossal increase from just 13,000 total DAO participants at the beginning of the year.
Parasol added that the Docklands DAO was designed to solve what he calls the “double shock” problem, where local areas need assistance recovering from economic fallout of COVID lockdowns, while also adapting to the new reality of a hybrid work-from-home model.
Parasol believes that DAOs are an essential step in the perfection of the “smart city”, which is a concept for a city that uses different types of technology such as voice detection and movement sensors to collect specific data.
“Smart cities were initially designed as public private partnerships with governments and companies who collect data and then reverse engineer that data to make a smart city.”
Parasol added that DAOs take the ambiguity and centralized control of data out of the equation, “Instead of smart cities being controlled by centralized partnerships between governments and data services like Cisco, DAO’s give the action of data to a given community”
“With the Docklands DAO, you get a specific type of DAO called a ‘data trust’, where information — like people flow data — gets handed over to the DAO in an anonymous and secure manner, then the DAO makes decisions about what to do with that data… It’s all based on community governance.”
Related: How do you DAO? Can DAOs scale and other burning questions
Communities adopting DAOs as a potential way to make their local areas more efficient is becoming increasingly common. In Sept. last year, a DAO based in Austin, Texas, called ATX DAO was launched in a move to educate citizens and surrounding governments about cryptocurrency while also providing funding for new programs in the local community.
A study conducted by crypto exchange platform Gemini finds that cryptocurrency adoption reached a crucial tipping point in 2021. In a new report, Gemini surveyed over 29,000 adults in 20 countries in an effort to gauge the world’s awareness and attitude toward digital assets. While polling citizens of North America, Latin America, Western Europe, the […]
The post Crypto Adoption Witnessed Massive Breakout Year in 2021, According to New Gemini Survey – Here’s Why appeared first on The Daily Hodl.
A new report from Cointelegraph Research analyzes GameFi’s bumper 2021 and what will be in store for the future.
This March, Cointelegraph Research will release a 30-page report about GameFi — the term used to describe the marriage of blockchain-based games with decentralized finance (DeFi). The report analyzes five popular play-to-earn (P2E) games, the economics of GameFi and the future development of an industry responsible for more than 55% of all crypto transactions in the last quarter of 2021.
In collaboration with multiple partners including Konvoy Ventures, Game7, Forte, Animoca Brands and others, the Cointelegraph Consulting Research report will evaluate the strength of in-game economies, the GameFi industry’s future challenges and potential ways to overcome them.
The report dives into five popular P2E games and compares the titles on balance deposited, number of active users and volume of transactions. The games will also receive one to five scores for gameplay and tokenomics. Economic activity on GameFi exploded in 2021 and entire economies developed. This report explores the economics of digital economies. It makes a case for a free-market economic model based on strong property rights.
Visit the New Cointelegraph Research Terminal here to sign up for early access to the report.
You don’t need to be a seasoned pro to find nuggets of useful information in this report. The report gives a broad overview of the GameFi industry with easy-to-digest data on five of the most popular P2E games. You’ll find informative charts and analyses of important concepts relevant to the GameFi industry and how the early trailblazers developed in 2021. An example of the data you can expect is in the chart below:
The chart shows the balance players have invested (in USD) in each game, representing how much value players place on their in-game material. The number of daily active users (measured by unique wallet addresses) is shown over a 30-day moving average. Volume represents the daily amount of incoming value (USD) to the game. Finally, each game is scored for its gameplay and tokenomics factors.
Before GameFi, the game worlds didn’t let players genuinely own their in-game assets. GameFi stores in-game material as unique tokens as nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and lets owners sell them on free markets for a price of their choice. Crypto gaming has grown in popularity as players collect and trade virtual assets. This generated dependable income for the game developers at the same time that it created value for players.
In 2020, Axie Infinity gamers in the Philippines earned their regular monthly salary by just playing the game at a time when measures against the COVID-19 pandemic brought economic hardship to the country. The chart below shows Axie Infinity’s dominance in GameFi based on in-game NFT trading volume:
Axie Infinity was the first smash hit of 2021 on GameFi. All assets and data on Axie are open source and using it does not require permission from Axie’s developers, SkyMavis. Developers in the community can build what they want and let the player community decide whether they like it or not. In other words: A free and open market is baked into the game design.
The five games’ rapid development is impressive, and 2022 promises to be a big year for P2E games. GameFi is changing the rules of gaming but is not without its share of challenges. Several regulatory concerns lie ahead for the industry. This report is an excellent source of information for anyone interested in GameFi. It showcases the superiority of open free trade over centrally planned economies.
This article is for information purposes only and represents neither investment advice nor an investment analysis or an invitation to buy or sell financial instruments. Specifically, the document does not serve as a substitute for individual investment or other advice.
Much like other activity in the digital asset space, crypto lobbying has been picking up during the past year.
Interaction between the cryptocurrency industry and Capitol Hill is becoming ever more intensive as efforts to regulate crypto grow in tandem with its popularity. The surge in crypto industry lobbying last year was given some concrete parameters in February by crypto analytics startup Crypto Head. It released a report showing that the crypto companies that spent the most money on lobbying in 2021 were Robinhood, Ripple Labs, Coinbase and the Blockchain Association. These organizations were the lobbying leaders during the past five years as well, although with different rankings.
Here is what the United States crypto-lobbying landscape looks like today.
Robinhood spent $1.35 million on lobbying in 2021 and was the only crypto-related organization to spend more than $1 million. Ripple Labs, in second place, spent $900,000. The Economist estimated a total of $5 million was spent by crypto firms on lobbying in the first three quarters of 2021.
To put this in perspective, the highest-spending lobbying group in the U.S. in 2020, the National Association of Realtors, spent $84.11 million according to the nonprofit Open Secrets, which provided the data for the Crypto Head report.
Blockchain Association executive director Kristin Smith said in an email to Cointelegraph that “Spending is only one metric of influence, and these roundups do not often provide context on the effectiveness of dollars spent.” Smith noted the Crypto Head report “mixes companies with different focuses, multi-member trade associations and other entities, making a one-to-one comparison difficult.”
Smith said education is the top priority of her organization. She told Fox News last year, “Our number-one priority is helping [Treasury Secretary Janet] Yellen understand crypto goes beyond the financing of criminal enterprises.”
The crypto industry was not alone in lobbying for cryptocurrency. The National Football League spent $600,000 lobbying Congress, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other government agencies in 2021 with the goal of determining “whether crypto can be an integral part of the League’s business,” according to CNBC sources. In February, former presidential candidate Andrew Yang launched Lobby3, a decentralized autonomous organization that will lobby for Web3 and the eradication of poverty.
Crypto Head noted the presence of “revolvers” in the ranks of cryptocurrency industry lobbyists, defining revolvers as “government regulators, congressional staff or members of Congress who take jobs in lobbying firms, making the most of their insider knowledge.” The narrative became richer in February with the release of the Tech Transparency Project (TTP) report “Crypto Industry Amasses Washington Insiders as Lobbying Blitz Intensifies.”
The TTP report documents the presence of “two former chairs of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), two former chairs of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and one former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee,” other former legislators and staffers of various sorts for a total of “nearly 240 examples of officials with key positions in the White House, Congress, federal regulatory agencies, and national political campaigns moving to and from the industry.”
While the employment of revolvers is common practice in many industries, and not only for lobbying, TTP saw a potential conflict of interest in movement from the industry into government. Specifically, five “former top executives at Circle Internet Financial,” operator of the stablecoin USD Coin (USDC), have joined the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston “even as the firm is seeking a bank charter from the Fed.” The Boston Fed is also taking part in the Project Hamilton research on a digital dollar.
Political action committees (PACs) give the crypto industry another opportunity to influence the political process, and there has been a flurry of organizations on that front as well. The American Blockchain PAC was founded in November with the goal of raising $300 million for pro-crypto candidates. However, it was reported in mid-February to have raised less than $8,000 so far.
In January, the $10-million Democratic Protect Our Future PAC was created, and donors include FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. The Gonna Make It (GMI) PAC launched the same month with backing from former Donald Trump communications director Anthony Scaramucci, with a tweet declaring, “When we organize, when we mobilize, we are unstoppable. We are GMI PAC, a super PAC that will elect pro-crypto candidates in federal races across the country.” It intends to raise $20 million.
Coinbase launched its second attempt at a PAC in February. It was a founding member of the Crypto Council for Innovation last April.
Crypto politics in the U.S. promises to be interesting this year.