1. Home
  2. sbf fraud

sbf fraud

Secret Alameda recording reveals exact moment staff learned about FTX deposits

A 75-minute recording, obtained by Cointelegraph, shows the exact moment former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison told employees about their use of FTX customer deposits.

A 75-minute secretly recorded audio clip of Caroline Ellison has revealed the exact moment 15 former Alameda Research staff found out the hedge fund was “borrowing” user funds from FTX. 

The full-length recording, obtained by Cointelegraph, provides fresh insights into the palpable tension felt by Ellison and Alameda staff in the lead-up to FTX’s collapse.

“Alameda was kind of borrowing a bunch of money via open-term loans and using that to make various illiquid investments. So like a bunch of FTX and FTX US equity [...] Most of Alameda's loans got called in in order to meet those recalls,” Ellison explained during an all-hands meeting in Hong Kong on Nov. 9, 2022.

“We ended up like borrowing a bunch of funds from FTX, which led to FTX having a shortfall in user funds.”

“[FTX] basically always allowed Alameda to borrow users’ funds,” she added, speaking to the 15 or so staff in the meeting.

Select segments of the audio recording of the meeting were also played before the court on the eighth day of Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial on Oct. 12, which was part of a witness testimony from Christian Drappi, a former software engineer at Alameda.

Drappi’s appearance on the witness stand came immediately following nearly three days of Ellison’s testimony. It is understood that before the meeting, Drappi and many other Alameda employees had no idea that the hedge fund had allegedly been using FTX customer deposits to prop up its trading activity.

In the recording, Drappi is also overheard asking Ellison when she became aware that FTX user deposits were being misused by Alameda, and who else at the company had known about it.

Initially Ellison flinched away from answering, but Drappi pressed again:

“I’m sure this wasn’t, like, a YOLO thing, right?”

Related: Changpeng Zhao’s tweet ‘contributed’ to collapse of FTX, claims Caroline Ellison

According to court reporting from the trial, the playback of this audio led to one of the more humorous moments in court, where Drappi had to explain the term “YOLO” to everyone in attendance, saying that he wanted Ellison to confirm that the use of FTX deposits hadn’t just been a “spontaneous” decision.

In his testimony, Drappi also described Ellison’s conduct at the meeting as “sunken” and didn’t display much in the way of confidence to Alameda employees. He said that he was “stunned” to learn about the extent of the relationship between FTX and Alameda, and he quit the next day.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Alameda Research engineer Aditya Baradwaj, who was also present at the meeting said the room was “extremely tense,” with Ellison surfacing a wealth of new information that had “never been discussed internally” — including the later-abandoned acquisition of FTX by its then-largest competitor Binance.

“It became pretty clear that there was no future for the company and that we all had to leave. And we did that right after,” said Baradwaj.

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market — Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

FTX used Python code to fake its insurance fund figure: Gary Wang

FTX’s so-called “Backstop Fund” figure was a big lie, according to the former chief technology officer of the crypto exchange

Crypto exchange FTX used hidden Python code to misrepresent the value of its insurance fund — a pool of funds meant to prevent user losses during huge liquidation events — according to testimony from FTX co-founder Gary Wang. 

In a damning new testimony on Oct. 6, FTX's former chief technology officer, Gary Wang, said that FTX’s so-called $100 million insurance fund in 2021 was actually fabricated, and also never actually contained any of the exchanges’ FTX tokens (FTT) as claimed.

Instead, the figure shown to the public was calculated by multiplying the daily trading volume of the FTX Token by a random number close to 7,500.

When the prosecution surfaced the above tweet — among other public statements of its value — and asked Wang whether this amount was accurate he replied with a single word: “No.”

“For one, there is no FTT in the insurance fund. It's just the USD number. And, two, the number listed here does not match what was in the database.”

An exhibit in the Oct. 6 trial shows the alleged code used to generate the size of the so-called "Backstop Fund” or public insurance fund. 

FTX's insurance fund was designed to protect user losses in case of huge, sudden market movements and its value was often touted on its website and social media.

According to Wang’s testimony, however, the amount contained within the fund was often insufficient to cover these losses.

For example, in 2021, a trader was able to exploit a bug in FTX's margin system to take an outsized position in MobileCoin, which resulted in a loss to the tune of hundreds of millions dollars for FTX, according to Wang.

When Bankman-Fried realized that the insurance fund had all but been exhausted, Wang said he was told to make Alameda “take on” the loss. This was supposedly in an attempt to hide the loss, as Alameda’s balance sheets were more private than those of FTX.

Related: Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton slams Sam Bankman-Fried sympathizers

In addition to revealing the allegedly fraudulent nature of FTX’s insurance fund, Wang claimed that he and Nishad Singh were prompted by Bankman-Fried to implement an “allow_negative” balance feature in the code at FTX, which allowed Alameda Research to trade with near-unlimited liquidity on the crypto exchange.

On Oct. 5 Wang — who has already pleaded guilty to all charges pressed against him — admitted to committing wire fraud, commodities fraud and securities fraud with Bankman-Fried, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison and former-FTX director of engineering Nishad Singh.

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market — Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Sam Bankman-Fried’s political donations can be surfaced in trial, rules judge

Despite campaign finance charges being dropped in July, the prosecution has been granted permission to present evidence of Bankman-Fried’s political donations in his upcoming fraud trial.

Prosecutors from the United States Department of Justice will be allowed to surface the details of Sam Bankman-Fried’s political donations as the evidence is directly relevant to his fraud charges, ruled U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan.

The decision was part of a series of rulings made by Kaplan in a 16-page pretrial order on Sept. 26, where he cleared up which evidence would be admissible in court during the FTX founders’ fraud trial, currently scheduled to begin on Oct. 3.

Federal prosecutors initially charged Bankman-Fried with conspiring to break United States campaign finance laws, as well as seven other fraud and conspiracy charges — however, later dropped the charges as part of an extradition agreement with the Bahamas.

"Evidence that the defendant spent FTX customer funds on political contributions is direct evidence of the wire fraud scheme because it is relevant to establishing the defendant's motive and allegedly fraudulent intent.”

In addition to allowing discussion of Bankman-Fried’s campaign donations, Kaplan also approved the prosecution’s motion to bring forward evidence that details Bankman-Fried’s alleged role in the creation of the FTX Token (FTT), and the ways in which he allegedly directed Alameda Research and its then-CEO Caroline Ellison to manipulate the price of the token.

Judge Kaplan’s ruling on Bankman-Fried’s political donation evidence. Source: CourtListener

"The alleged manipulation of the cryptocurrency tokens, which resulted in an alleged manipulation of Alameda’s balance sheet, was an act 'done in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy' and therefore is considered 'part of the very act charged,’” wrote Kaplan.

“Moreover, defendant’s alleged directive to Ms. Ellison to manipulate the price of FTT is direct evidence of their “relationship of mutual trust.” The probative value of this evidence outweighs any risk of unfair prejudice. It is admissible,” Kaplan concluded.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyer renews request for temporary release from jail

While Kaplan approved many submissions of evidence for the DOJ, he also approved Bankman-Fried’s lawyers to question government witnesses about their recreational drug use, as long as they provided prior notice to the court.

Government witnesses include Caroline Ellison, former FTX engineer Nishad Singh and FTX co-founder Gary Wang.

Kaplan also denied the DoJ's motions to block the defense from cross-examining witnesses on certain “privileged” issues. Additionally, he ruled that Bankman-Fried would not be able to discuss any details of his pre-trial detention, family background, wealth, or age before a jury.

Big Questions: What’s with all the crypto deaths?

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report

Kevin O’Leary Slammed for Saying He’d Back Former FTX CEO Again — Insists SBF Is a ‘Brilliant’ Crypto Trader

Kevin O’Leary Slammed for Saying He’d Back Former FTX CEO Again — Insists SBF Is a ‘Brilliant’ Crypto TraderShark Tank star Kevin O’Leary, aka Mr. Wonderful, says that he would again back Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the former CEO of the collapsed crypto exchange FTX. “You can’t be serious,” many people told O’Leary, alleging that SBF is a fraud who stole billions from FTX customers. Kevin O’Leary Ignores Evidence of Fraud, Says He’d Back […]

Possible Trump Pick for SEC Chair Outlines Plan To Position US as One of Global Leaders in Crypto: Report