1. Home
  2. SBF

SBF

Breaking: Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all charges

Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial has concluded with a jury finding him guilty of all seven charges.

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has been found guilty of all of the seven charges in his criminal trial by a jury in New York.

Bankman-Fried was found guilty of two counts of wire fraud and two counts of wire fraud conspiracy along with one count of securities fraud, one count of commodities fraud conspiracy and one count of money laundering conspiracy.

He will return to court for sentencing by New York District Judge Lewis Kaplan at a later date.

Bankman-Fried’s crimes total a maximum of 110 years in prison with the wire fraud, wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy carrying a maximum 20-year sentence.

Other key FTX executives including former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, FTX co-founder Gary Wang and former FTX engineering head Nishad Singh have all pleaded guilty to various charges and worked with the government to testify against Bankman-Fried.

Related:  ‘Fuck regulators,’ said SBF behind closed doors: Report

Bankman-Fried had previously pleaded not guilty to all charges and during his trial, he took the stand to maintain his innocence and mark up FTX’s November 2022 collapse as "a number of big mistakes." He denied any wrongdoing in FTX’s relationship with Alameda and attempted to distance himself from key decisions.

Bankman-Fried pinned the blame on Wang for creating a function that allowed Alameda to trade funds on FTX that it didn’t have and claimed he “wasn’t entirely sure what happened” with Alameda’s line of credit, which ballooned to billions in the collapsing crypto market of 2022.

Magazine: Blockchain detectives — Mt. Gox collapse saw birth of Chainalysis

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.

Additional reporting by Ana Paula Pereira.

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Claim Prosecution Painted Him as a ‘Monster’ in FTX Fraud Trial’s Closing Arguments

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Claim Prosecution Painted Him as a ‘Monster’ in FTX Fraud Trial’s Closing Arguments

The attorneys of disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried argued that the prosecution is unfairly painting the defendant as a “monster” as the trial closes. According to a Reuters report, Mark Cohen, Bankman-Fried’s lawyer, addressed the jury and said that the prosecution elicited testimony about the defendant’s sex life and appearance in an attempt to paint […]

The post Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Claim Prosecution Painted Him as a ‘Monster’ in FTX Fraud Trial’s Closing Arguments appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

SBF criminal trial moves to closing arguments

Bankman-Fried pleaded not guilty to all seven counts of fraud charges related to the collapse of crypto exchange FTX.

The ongoing criminal trial involving FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) will move into closing arguments on November 1. 

On Day 15 of the SBF trial, lead defense attorney Mark Cohen's request for acquittal was denied by presiding judge Lewis Kaplan. Instead, the case will move to closing arguments from both sides at 9:30 a.m. ET (1:30 p.m. UTC) on Nov. 1, with all evidence discovery concluded. Attornies from both sides declined to call any further witnesses. 

SBF has pleaded not guilty to all seven fraud-related charges in his criminal case, but is expected to face five more counts in a second trial scheduled to start in March 2024, including the alleged $150 million bribe of a Chinese government official.

During discovery, prosecutor Danielle Sassoon presented documents, tweets, and corporate messages attesting that the crypto executive siphoned $8 billion worth of FTX customers' deposits to fund a series of risky trades at his hedge fund, Alameda Research. SBF, on the other hand, denied that such actions constituted fraud. In his defense, SBF claimed that taking customers' deposits was merely a "risk management" procedure necessary for Alameda's portfolio, and the said process was in line with company policies

Key FTX personnel, such as Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, FTX CTO Gary Wang, and former FTX head of engineering Nishad Singh, have all pled guilty to charges relating to the exchange's collapse last November and are currently cooperating with the U.S. government in their testimonies against SBF. If convicted, Bankman-Fried faces a maximum penalty of 115 years in prison. 

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried trial [Day 15] — latest update: Live coverage

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Sam Bankman-Fried Describes Fearing ‘Run on the Bank’ Before FTX Collapse in November of Last Year: Report

Sam Bankman-Fried Describes Fearing ‘Run on the Bank’ Before FTX Collapse in November of Last Year: Report

The disgraced former CEO of the bankrupt crypto exchange FTX is testifying in his own fraud trial against the US government. In court transcripts recorded by Inner City Press, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) recounts the day that Binance’s Changpeng Zhao (CZ) tweeted that the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume was liquidating all of its FTX […]

The post Sam Bankman-Fried Describes Fearing ‘Run on the Bank’ Before FTX Collapse in November of Last Year: Report appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

‘Fuck regulators,’ said SBF behind closed doors: Report

The disgraced crypto executive frequently praised the need for crypto regulation in public.

Despite publicly supporting drafting crypto regulation to protect customers, disgraced crypto exchange FTX founder Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried appears to have shared a deep disdain for regulators.

During SBF’s ongoing criminal trial, Assistant U.S. Prosecutor Danielle Sassoon inquired if the crypto executive could recall his previous Twitter statements regarding his support of blockchain regulation to protect customers. “I don’t remember,” SBF said. Sasson asked, “But in private, you said, fuck regulators, right?”

“I said that once,” SBF replied. Among other profanities, the former crypto executive also stated that he viewed a “subset of people” on Crypto Twitter as “dumb motherfuckers.” Before his arrest, SBF testified in a 2021 hearing before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee on crypto regulation. 

“You said it [regulations] was P.R. [public relations]?” asked Sassoon. SBF responded, “I said something like that.”

During additional questioning, SBF also claimed that the benefits of helping draft crypto regulation included assisting in FTX taking market share from competitor exchange Binance. Before FTX’s collapse last November, SBF revealed that the exchange, along with sister hedge fund Alameda Research, held close to $15 billion in customers’ deposits, with $10 billion reported missing.

On Nov. 8, 2022, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao signed a letter of intent to acquire FTX. The deal fell apart just a day later after Binance reportedly viewed FTX’s books and discovered the asset discrepancy. SBF recalled that on Nov. 7, 2022, customer net withdrawals amounted to $4 billion, or 100 times the volume of an average trading day, sending the company into a deep liquidity crisis.

 The criminal trial of Bankman-Fried is ongoing and is expected to wrap up by early next week. 

Magazine: Bitmain’s revenge, Hong Kong’s crypto rollercoaster

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Binance founder CZ’s fortune gets slashed $12B, while SBF is still at $0

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao’s crypto empire has fallen over 80% from its January 2022 peak of almost $97 billion.

Binance co-founder and CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has seen his net worth slashed by $11.9 billion amid falling trading volumes at his exchange.

On Oct. 26, the Bloomberg Billionaires Index cut Binance’s revenue estimates by 38% amid a slump in exchange volumes which knocked Zhao down to 95th place on the rich list.

Zhao’s net worth is now a paltry $17.3 billion, registering an 82% drop from its $96.9 billion peak in January 2022, where he was ranked 11th among the world's richest people.

Zhao’s net worth peaked at $96.9 billion in early 2022 before dropping alongside the crypto market. Source: Bloomberg

Bloomberg’s index calculated Binance’s revenues from spot and derivatives trading data from crypto data aggregators CoinGecko and Coinpaprika.

As of September, the exchange’s spot trading market share had fallen for seven consecutive months to 34.3%. In January, Binance’s spot market share was over 55%.

Binance.US, its United States-based arm, also saw volumes touch new lows last month.

Zhao’s plummeting net worth and Binance’s fading trading volumes follow twin suits from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The SEC sued Zhao, Binance and Binance.US in June claiming the exchanges operated illegally, sold unregistered securities and mishandled customer assets with Zhao named as their “controlling person.”

The CFTC’s suit months earlier in March claimed Binance did not properly register with the regulator. Zhao and Binance reject both regulators’ allegations and seek to dismiss both lawsuits.

Related: Cynthia Lummis leads the charge calling for DOJ action against Binance and Tether

The recent fall pales compared to CZ’s once-crypto-rival Sam Bankman-Fried, who saw his $16 billion fortune effectively wiped out in November 2022 after FTX disclosed its liquidity crisis just days before it filed for bankruptcy.

Some believe the crisis was kicked off by a tweet from CZ when he announced that Binance was selling its FTX Token (FTT) holdings, triggering a mass of withdrawals from FTX. Zhao initially moved to buy the embattled exchange but pulled out less than 48 hours later.

Bankman-Fried took to the witness stand in his own criminal trial on Oct. 26, where he has previously pleaded not guilty to two counts of fraud and five counts of conspiracy.

Magazine: Deposit risk: What do crypto exchanges really do with your money?

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

SBF grilled in court on deleted messages during testimony

The disgraced crypto executive claimed that he merely acted on various lapses in the company's data retention policy.

Disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) tried to explain his rationale for deleting corporate messages during a closed-door testimony without the presence of the trial's jury on Oct. 26.

When prompted as to why he started using corporate communications on the encrypted messaging app Signal by prosecutor Danielle Sassoon of the Southern District of New York, SBF claimed that he only did so with the approval of FTX counsel Daniel Friedberg. However, SBF later said that while counsel approved the use of Signal, he never sought prior approval before utilizing the app's auto-delete feature.

"At some point I remember changing my toggle to one week auto delete," the former crypto executive said, adding that the practice has been in place since 2021. "Did you seek approval?" Asked Sassoon. "No," replied SBF.

When asked to explain his rationale, SBF claimed that a document retention policy, in place since 2021 and allegedly approved by Friedberg, only applied to emails and not other forms of communication. "Did any lawyer tell you you could delete your messages with Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang and Nishad Singh?" Sassoon asked. "Not specifically," replied SBF.

"I apologize, I wish I had that [document retention] policy now. My memory..."

Regarding communications on the seven "fake" balance sheets prepared by colleague Caroline Ellison, SBF said deleting the message was permissible because "Yes. For example, verbal discussions were not required to be reported." In a later question about an alleged $13 billion hole in the exchange's balance sheet, SBF claimed that the messages were never shared with lawyers in accordance with the company's data retention policy. "I was concerned that statements could be taken out of context, that it could be embarrassing," he said.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried thought ‘taking FTX deposits through Alameda was legal’

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Sam Bankman-Fried has no way to ‘out-fox’ prosecutors: Scaramucci

SBF taking the stand in his criminal trial is “a very bad move” as the FTX co-founder will be “skinned alive” by prosecutors, says Anthony Scaramucci.

Sam Bankman-Fried will be no match for government prosecutors who will poke holes in his defense when he takes the stand in his criminal trial, says SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci.

In an Oct. 25 interview on CNBC’s “Last Call,” Scaramucci said the Department of Justice prosecutors will “point out all the contradictions” he believes Bankman-Fried has made which will “add years to his sentence."

"He’s gonna get skinned alive, there’s no way to escape. He thinks he’s going to out-fox the prosecutors but they’re very, very well experienced with this stuff."

Scaramucci believed there’s been a “whole revision of history” on Bankman-Fried as around a year ago he was thought of as a “congenial nerd who was going to give all his money away” but the testimony of former FTX executives showed "there was malevolence."

“He thought he was going to take that money and he was so smart that he would out-trade the market and put the money back and end up as a half-a-trillionaire but it never works like that,” he added.

Related: Will Sam Bankman-Fried fix his case when he takes the stand?

In September 2022 FTX Ventures acquired a 30% stake in SkyBridge which Scaramucci is trying to buyback from the now-bankrupt firm.

Scaramucci (middle left), Bankman-Fried (middle right) and Kevin O'Leary dining at a New York conference. Source: SALT

In January he told Cointelegraph he thought Bankman-Fried was "the Mark Zuckerberg of crypto" before the allegations that the former FTX CEO misappropriated customer funds.

On CNBC, Scaramucci said he took Bankman-Fried to heads of state which he was now “embarrassed” about but at the time he saw “a smart guy who was well intended."

"He's gonna get nailed here going on the stand" Scaramucci added. "It's a very bad move for him."

Magazine: NFT collapse and monster egos feature in new Murakami exhibition

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Sam Bankman-Fried seeks expert to counter testimony from DOJ witnesses

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried intends to call on a financial expert to rebuff testimonies from Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, Nishad Singh and Adam Yedidia.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyers are planning to put forward an expert witness to counter testimony from former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison and other witnesses about the extent of financial ties between FTX and the trading firm.

In an Oct. 23 letter to New York District Judge Lewis Kaplan, Bankman-Fried’s attorneys said Joseph Pimbley from litigation consulting firm PF2 Securities would testify on behalf of the former FTX CEO.

The letter lays out that Pimbley will testify — based on FTX database information — that Alameda’s line of credit with FTX “fluctuated between approximately $1 billion and $3 billion” between October 2021 and September 2022 and decreased in June 2022 which has the goal of establishing a definitive timeline for the line of credit.

Pimbley will also testify that the majority of balances for non-FTX and non-Alameda users are in U.S. dollars, Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and Tether (USDT) and over 75% of non-FTX and Alameda user balances “arise from accounts that have spot margin enabled, spot margin lending enabled, or show futures activity” — which could provide context to testimony made by former FTX executives.

Highlighted excerpt of the letter on testimony Pimbley will counter regarding FTX customer trading. Source: CourtListener

The testimony is also set to rebuff a testimony by Ellison, FTX co-founder Gary Wang, former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh and former FTX employee Adam Yedidia regarding Alameda’s line of credit and FTX customer use of margin trading.

Dr. Pimbley is set to counter Ellison’s testimony that Alameda had “an essentially unlimited line of credit on FTX” and Wang’s testimony that the firm had borrowed “around $3 billion” from the credit line.

Related: FTX creditor claims breach the 50c mark as buyers see light at the end of the tunnel

Pimbley’s 54-page disclosure details various charts, spreadsheet excerpts, diagrams, and database queries pulled from FTX’s Amazon Web Services database that relate to FTX’s line of credit with Alameda between October 2021 and November 2022.

Pimbley is being remunerated at a rate of $720 an hour plus expenses for his work but said he has “no financial interest in the outcome of this case.”

He was one of seven expert witnesses earlier put forward by Bankman-Fried’s legal team, which Judge Kaplan barred from testifying but allowed future testimony if they were to respond to government witness testimony and clarify their claims.

Magazine: Web3 Gamer: ‘Ethical’ SBF game axed, Web3 games sign-up process sucks, Tomb Chaser

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick

Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial is telling a story of classic financial deceit

Disgraced FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried wasn't the first financial kingpin to get creative with balance sheets, and he won't be the last.

The courtroom drama unfolding around FTX founder and former CSam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has all the ingredients of a binge-worthy Netflix series, replete with a cast of shady characters and a plot that thickens with each passing day. Among the highlights were SBF's lofty presidential ambitions and a staggering $100-150 million bribe to Chinese officials, which add a surreal twist to the narrative.

If SBF aimed to script a thrilling courtroom drama for his Netflix debut, he's nailed it. However, when it comes to establishing his innocence, the plot leaves much to be desired.

The courtroom was electrified by testimony from Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda Research, FTX’s trading arm. It resonated with brutal honesty that's rare in such high-stake trials. It was emotional and raw, in a sincere way. One shocking revelation she shared was that the company created seven fraudulent balance sheets created seven fraudulent balance sheets, laid out for SBF to cherry-pick one that would best serve his agenda.

Related: It’s time for the SEC to settle with Coinbase and Ripple

“When I started working at Alameda, I don’t think I would have believed you if you told me I would be sending false balance sheets to our lenders, or taking customer money, but over time, it was something I became more comfortable with,” Ellison told jurors.

The jury doesn't seem to need a spoiler alert to predict the ending of this story. The overwhelming evidence points towards a guilty verdict, a risk calculus that seems to elude SBF. Which isn’t surprising given that he was ultimately responsible for calculating the odds for FTX’s risk management before it imploded.

When the gavel finally falls, it's likely to echo the verdict handed down to Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes — though it could easily surpass her 11-year sentence. (He’s facing a combined total of more than 100 years.) And the legal rollercoaster doesn’t end here for SBF, because a second trial is due to begin in March. That trial will include six charges beyond the seven in court today, including campaign finance violations.

Grifters are going to grift. But what are the takeaways from this riveting saga?

There's a profound lesson to be learned from the SBF trial. While cryptocurrency is hailed for its potential to redefine the financial ecosystem, the trial is showing how traditional financial deceit can infiltrate the space, casting long shadows over the revolutionary promise of blockchain technology.

As SBF awaits his fate in the courtroom, the crypto community should seize this moment to reflect, learn, and realign with the fundamental ethos of cryptocurrency. The journey of self-custody may be laden with challenges, but it's a path that leads to financial autonomy and empowerment, embodying the true spirit of what cryptocurrencies are envisioned to be.

As the trial unfolds and the crypto world watches with bated breath, let it serve as a catalyst for introspection and a return to basics of self-custody and decentralization.

FTX’s fall from grace wasn't a product of crypto's inherent flaws but a classic tale of financial deceit, where the crypto landscape was merely the backdrop. The fraud wasn’t unique to the crypto domain; it was the age-old narrative of unaudited balance sheets meeting fraud, a scene right out of the traditional finance playbook.

This trial isn’t just a sensational headline; it’s a stark reminder of the perils of veering away from the core principles of cryptocurrency. The ethos of crypto is rooted in the elimination of middlemen, which stands in stark contrast to the narrative SBF spun around his empire.

While the founders of bona fide crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken advocate for the mantra of “not your keys, not your coins,” promoting self-custody, SBF championed the opposite, urging investors to entrust him with their digital assets — perhaps because he planned to steal them.

Related: Michael Lewis' new book puts a positive spin on Sam Bankman-Fried

A slew of crypto investors, enticed by the mirage of convenience, relinquished the responsibility of self-custodying their assets, allowing SBF and his crew of pirates to steer the ship, much to their detriment.

The traditional banking system, with its ease and convenience, comes at a hefty price— censorship risks, fiat inflation, hidden fees, and sluggish transactions. Self custody, like freedom, isn’t easy, it’s hard. But crypto isn’t supposed to be easy. It is a revolution in finance aimed to make you more free and empowered. It's not meant to be a walk in the park; it’s a revolution aimed at empowering individuals in the financial realm.

This trial beckons a return to the basics for the crypto community. It’s high time to delve back into the writings of cypherpunk visionaries like Timothy May, Eric Hughes, and modern-day prophets like Vitalik Buterin and Nick Szabo.

Ignore the flashy ads, sidestep the crypto clickbait, and invest time in understanding the principles of hardware wallets and operational security. Dive into the ethos of the cypherpunks, grasp the essence of operational security, and ensure you're in the crypto space for the right reasons. The allure of “number go up” and the charm of charismatic founders should never eclipse the fundamental principles that form the bedrock of cryptocurrency.

J.W. Verret is an associate professor at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School. He is a practicing crypto forensic accountant and also practices securities law at Lawrence Law LLC. He is a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Advisory Council and a former member of the SEC Investor Advisory Committee. He also leads the Crypto Freedom Lab, a think tank fighting for policy change to preserve freedom and privacy for crypto developers and users.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Crypto Strategist Says Bottom Is In for Solana (SOL)-Based Memecoin, Unveils Top AI Altcoin Pick