1. Home
  2. SEC Fine

SEC Fine

SEC serves $4M in fines to Coinme over ‘misleading’ UpToken ICO

The regulator nabbed the crypto ATM operator turned exchange for securities law violations over its sales and statements of a crypto token.

The United States securities regulator has handed down nearly $4 million in fines to crypto exchange Coinme for allegedly offering unregistered securities and giving “misleading statements” on its crypto token UpToken (UP).

On April 28 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said it settled charges against Coinme, its subsidiary Up Global SEZC and the CEO of both firms, Neil Bergquist.

Up Global agreed to pay a $3.52 million penalty, for which Coinme was also liable. Separate penalties against Coinme and Bergquist of $250,000 and $150,000 respectively were also leveled, which both have agreed to pay.

In its order, the SEC alleged Coinme, Up Global and Bergquist’s Initial Coin Offering (ICO) of UP between October to December 2017 was an investment contract under the Howey test and were subsequently unregistered securities offerings.

The September 2017 press release announcing UpToken. Source: GlobeNewswire

The ICO raised around $3.6 million to expand the amount of Bitcoin (BTC) ATMs in Coinme’s fleet, with which it added 30 ATMs using ICO funding. UP holders received benefits such as discounted fees and a 1% cashback paid in UP when using the ATMs.

In January 2019, Coinme changed its offering and partnered with Coinstar to use its cash-counting kiosks to facilitate cash-to-crypto transactions rather than its own ATMs. By July 2019 Coinme shut down all of its own ATMs.

“There is currently no use for UpToken, and UpToken holders can no longer use UpToken to obtain the benefits that were described in the UpToken offering materials.”

The price of UP has seen a significant drawdown since, with its market cap also falling to around $50,000 and 24-hour trading volumes topping just over $180.

The price of UpToken from early 2018 to today. Source: CoinMarketCap

Bergquist and Up Global also made “false and misleading statements” about the demand for UpToken and the amount raised in the offering according to the SEC.

Up Global said Coinme’s purchasing of UP to fund its ATM rewards program would create constant demand for the token, but the SEC said:

“Bergquist and Up Global took steps before and throughout the ICO to obtain an UpToken supply that would substantially reduce Coinme's need to purchase UpToken after the ICO for the ATM rewards program.”

The SEC claimed Coinme sent 160 BTC worth over $1 million at the time to an Up Global wallet used to receive investor funds in the ICO. Up Global sent back around 14.5 million UP at a discount to Coinme and the transaction “knowingly or recklessly” created the impression that a third party made a large purchase.

Related: Rep. McHenry announces hearings to address market structure around crypto

In another example, it was claimed Bergquist negotiated a 500 Bitcoin round-trip transaction of UP tokens with an unnamed Hong Kong company, with Coinme borrowing the funds to purchase further UP at a discount. The transaction was also used to create an impression of demand for the tokens.

The SEC said Bergquist didn’t admit or deny the regulator's findings, agreed to settle the charges and was barred from acting as an executive of a public company for three years.

Cointelegraph contacted Coinme for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Yougov Poll Reveals Nearly 15% Would Switch Their Bank Accounts for Crypto in Brazil

How Crypto Twitter reacted to Kim Kardashian’s $1.26M SEC fine

Some pointed out the regulator's supposed hypocrisy, others told crypto-influencers to lawyer up, whilst a few poked fun at the reality TV star.

The crypto community reacted with a mix of disbelief and amusement after reality star Kim Kardashian was fined for promoting the cryptocurrency EthereumMax (EMAX). 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined Kardashian $1.26 million on Oct. 3, for “touting on social media” about the EMAX without disclosing she was paid $250,000 to post about it.

Kardashian has neither admitted to nor denied the SEC’s allegations, but settled the charges and agreed to not promote any cryptocurrency assets until 2025.

SEC chairman Gary Gensler tweeted the fine was a reminder that celebrity endorsement of investment opportunities doesn't “mean those investment products are right for all investors.”

Following Gensler’s tweet, the online crypto community expressed their thoughts on the fine, with some calling out the SEC for its inconsistent enforcement decisions. 

Economist Peter Schiff, known for his anti-Bitcoin (BTC) stance, pointed out what he perceived was an unfair targeting of Kardashian as the SEC hasn’t fined MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor who he believes has “more to gain pumping crypto.”

Saylor responded saying Bitcoin isn’t a security but a commodity and its promotion would be “similar to promoting steel…or granite” and the coin's open protocol offers “utilitarian beliefs similar to roads.”

Crypto-personality and author Layah Heilpern shared she believed “the SEC has bigger issues closer to home it should probably focus on…” likely inferring the widely held belief in the community that certain U.S. politicians have inside traded.

Pseudonymous developer 0xBender noted a contrast between the SEC’s heavy-handed treatment of crypto promotions from celebrities, while crypto-centric influencers “have been out here shilling you garbage for 0.2 ETH (Ethereum) a tweet.”

Others such as former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti said influencers thinking to endorse cryptocurrencies should “take note” as the regulator is showing it will “aggressively pursue enforcement actions” and those who promote crypto without considering the laws will “need to find a good lawyer.”

Meanwhile, Ethereum educator and investor Anthony Sassano told his followers he believes the SEC targeted Kardashian because it creates the illusion the regulator is “doing something” about crypto scams, and suggested it should've targeted the creators of EMAX instead.

Related: The SEC is bullying Kim Kardashian, and it could chill the influencer economy

Still, some saw the lighter side of investing in a tumultuous and highly speculative crypto token, with journalist Tyler Conway saying the star “got the full crypto experience” by losing more money than she’d been paid.

Self-described hacker and tech content creator Marcus Hutchins said Kardashian “would have gotten better returns” in EthereumMax as it’s down 97% since her post, compared to the -80% the promotion returned for her.

Yougov Poll Reveals Nearly 15% Would Switch Their Bank Accounts for Crypto in Brazil

SEC Fines John McAfee’s Associate $375K in Penalties for ICO Promotions

SEC Fines John McAfee’s Associate 5K in Penalties for ICO PromotionsAccording to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) judgment, Jimmy Gale Watson, a former associate of the now deceased John McAfee, has been fined for being paid to promote pump and dump-fashioned initial coin offerings (ICOs). The SEC has ruled that Watson must pay roughly $375K in penalties and he’s not allowed to participate in […]

Yougov Poll Reveals Nearly 15% Would Switch Their Bank Accounts for Crypto in Brazil

Surprise twist as BlockFi receives Money Services License in Iowa

Despite a significant fine from Iowa’s regulator just two weeks earlier, BlockFi has scored itself a license in the state.

Just two weeks after being fined by Iowa’s regulators for offering and selling unregistered securities, crypto lending platform BlockFi announced on June 28 thait has received a Money Services License in the state.

The Iowan license will allow the crypto lender to receive money and sell payment instruments in the state. BlockFi on Twitter stated it will begin by allowing Iowan residents to trade stablecoins.

Previously on June 14 the Iowa Insurance Division (IID) responsible for securities sales in the state fined BlockFi over $943,000 for violations of the state’s Securities Act. IID alleged BlockFi had “offered and sold securities in Iowa that were not registered or permitted for sale in Iowa” along with failing to register as a broker-dealer or agent.

The fine was part of a larger penalty brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February for not registering an offering of high-yield interest accounts that the commission deemed to be securities.

The fine was one of the largest penalties ever imposed by a federal regulator on a crypto business. BlockFi was hit with $100 million in settlements, with half paid to the SEC and the other half to 32 states which brought forward similar charges.

Shortly after, BlockFi said it intended to register with the SEC for a crypto interest-bearing security for its U.S. customers to replace its current interest accounts offering.

The new license is a glimmer of good news for BlockFi which has struggled along with other blockchain and crypto companies in the worsening market conditions and falling crypto prices.

On June 16, BlockFi was among the lending firms forced to liquidate some of the positions from venture firm Three Arrow Capital (3AC) with the latter unable to meet a margin call on its Bitcoin (BTC) borrowings.

Celsius, a rival crypto lending platform, paused customer withdrawals on June 13 attributing the decision to the market conditions. Other reports followed that the company was facing liquidity issues and would soon be facing insolvency.

Related: Community reacts after SEC’s Gensler affirms BTC’s commodity status

These conditions have also seen a round of layoffs from blockchain and crypto companies, with BlockFi CEO Zac Prince saying on June 14 that it would be letting 20% of its staff go in order to remain profitable. It’s unknown how much of an effect the SEC’s financial penalties had on the decision.

A week later on June 21, BlockFi received a lifeline from crypto exchange FTX which saw BlockFi sign a revolving credit facility agreement for $250 million to bolster the firm's balance sheets and strengthen the platform. 

Days later, it was reported that FTX may be in talks to purchase a stake in BlockFi, although a BlockFi spokesperson told Cointelegraph on June 24 that it “does not comment on market rumors" and is “still negotiating the terms of the deal”, and shareholders are reportedly unhappy with the move as it would wipe out shareholder equity. 

It has recently been reported that Anthony Pompliano's investment firm Morgan Creek is attempting to put together an alternative $250 million deal to buy a majority stake in BlockFi.

Yougov Poll Reveals Nearly 15% Would Switch Their Bank Accounts for Crypto in Brazil

Crypto Lender Blockfi Secures $250 Million Line of Credit From FTX, CEO Says Capital Will Bolster Its Balance Sheet

Crypto Lender Blockfi Secures 0 Million Line of Credit From FTX,  CEO Says Capital Will Bolster Its Balance SheetThe crypto lender Blockfi detailed on Tuesday that the company secured a $250 million line of credit from FTX. Blockfi’s CEO Zac Prince announced on Twitter that the company will use the capital to bolster Blockfi’s “balance sheet and platform strength.” Blockfi Obtains $250 Million Revolving Credit Line From FTX After Crypto Lending Firms Struggle […]

Yougov Poll Reveals Nearly 15% Would Switch Their Bank Accounts for Crypto in Brazil