1. Home
  2. securities laws

securities laws

SEC wins $2.8M in suit over alleged crypto token price manipulation

Hydrogen Technology Corp. and its former CEO will pay $2.8 million in fines and remedies for allegedly operating a price manipulation scheme.

A seven-month-long lawsuit between the United States securities regulator and a firm alleged to have manipulated the price of cryptocurrencies has come to a close with a $2.8 million payment.

On April 20, a New York District Court Judge ruled against Hydrogen Technology Corporation and its former CEO Michael Ross Kane in a suit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), ordering them to pay $2.8 million in remedies and civil penalties.

The sum comprises approximately $1.5 million in “disgorged” profits — which refers to gains made from unlawful conduct — as well as a penalty of more than $1 million.

Additionally, Hydrogen CEO Michael Kane agreed to pay an individual fine of approximately $260,000. The remaining amount is made up of prejudgement interest.

In September 2022, the SEC filed its complaint alleging Kane used Hydrogen’s market maker Moonwalkers Trading Limited to perpetrate a scheme that manipulated the volume and price of its ERC-20 token Hydro (HYDRO).

The SEC claimed Kane and Moonwalkers CEO Tyler Ostern worked “to create the false appearance of robust market activity” following the distribution of Hydrogen’s Hydro tokens by way of airdrops, bounty programs and direct-to-market sales in 2018.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Ostern sold the tokens in an “artificially inflated market” which saw Hydrogen net more than $2 million in profit.

A day after the complaint was brought forward, Ostern agreed to settle the case for $41,000.

Related: SEC’s ‘brute force’ crypto regulation attempt is ‘bad policy’ — Paradigm

Both Hydrogen and Kane are now bound by the conditions of the settlement, which bars them from further disputing the charges that have been levied against them by the SEC.

Kane and the firm will be prohibited from selling any additional cryptocurrency until the Hydro tokens have passed the Howey test and received further approval from the SEC.

Kane is still permitted to participate in the wider cryptocurrency market, meaning he can still buy and sell crypto assets for personal gain.

Hall of Flame: Crypto Wendy on trashing the SEC, sexism, and how underdogs can win

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

SEC Charges Crypto Exchange Bittrex With Operating Unregistered Exchange, Broker, and Clearing Agency

SEC Charges Crypto Exchange Bittrex With Operating Unregistered Exchange, Broker, and Clearing AgencyAfter the report revealing that the cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex had received a Wells Notice from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the securities regulator charged Bittrex and the company’s CEO on April 17 for “operating an unregistered exchange, broker, and clearing agency.” Following the Wells Notice, SEC Charges Bittrex for Violating Federal Laws On […]

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

SEC in a Pickle: Crypto’s Tricky Trio Stirs Up Trouble in 2023

SEC in a Pickle: Crypto’s Tricky Trio Stirs Up Trouble in 20232023 is shaping up to be a painful year for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as it finds itself entangled in battles with the ever-evolving and innovative cryptocurrency industry. From Ripple to Coinbase and Tron, the SEC faces fierce opposition with potentially huge consequences. The following opinion editorial was written by Joseph Collement, […]

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

What are the Howey test and its implications for cryptocurrency?

The Howey test’s impact on cryptocurrency, explained — legal implications, compliance requirements and more.

What is the Howey test?

The Howey test is a legal test used in the United States to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. The test was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. (1946), and it has since been applied in numerous cases to determine whether various financial arrangements and offerings constitute securities. 

According to the Howey test, a transaction must contain an investment of funds in a group venture with the expectation that all gains will come from group efforts. A transaction is deemed a security if it satisfies these requirements, in which case it is subject to federal securities laws and regulations.

Understanding the criteria for a security

The test involves three key criteria that must be met in order for a transaction to qualify as a security, as discussed below:

The first criterion is a financial investment, which means that participants in the transaction must be risking their own money. This comprises both financial and in-kind investments.

The second requirement is a shared enterprise, which denotes that the financial success of the investors is somehow connected. This can be proven by providing evidence of the investors’ resource pooling or reliance on a third party to manage their investments.

The third criterion is an expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others, which means that the investors are relying on someone else to generate a return on their investment. This could include, for example, profits generated by a third-party manager or profits generated by the efforts of a particular group or organization.

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency: Is it a security or not?

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency are significant, as the test provides a framework for determining whether a particular cryptocurrency offering should be classified as a security under U.S. law. If a cryptocurrency offering meets the criteria outlined in the Howey test, it may be considered a security and subject to federal securities laws.

This has important ramifications for crypto businesses and investors since breaking federal securities laws can result in penalties, legal action and reputational harm to the business. To make sure they are in compliance with federal securities laws, cryptocurrency companies should carefully consider the Howey test before creating their offerings.

Related: Crypto and securities: New interpretation of US Howey test gaining ground

Tokens that do not pass the Howey test are considered utility tokens that provide investors with access to a future product or service or can be redeemed for discounted fees. While utility tokens are typically not considered securities, the SEC has suggested that the presence of a utility token framework does not necessarily mean that a project is exempt from being classified as a security.

Ultimately, the implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency will depend on how regulators choose to apply the test in practice and how cryptocurrency companies choose to structure their offerings to comply with federal securities law.

Compliance with federal securities laws: What cryptocurrency companies need to know

Cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of the federal securities laws in the United States to ensure compliance with them. Here are some key things to keep in mind:

  • Securities laws apply to cryptocurrencies: Several cryptocurrencies are seen as securities by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This implies that cryptocurrency businesses must abide by federal securities laws, including the requirements for registration and disclosure.
  • Token offerings may be subject to securities laws: It can count as a securities offering if a cryptocurrency company sells tokens to the general public in return for cash or other assets. As a result, the business would have to adhere to securities rules, which would include registering the offering with the SEC.
  • The use of funds must be disclosed: A cryptocurrency company must state its financial goals when raising money through a securities offering. The business must also keep investors informed about how the money is being used.
  • Trading platforms may be subject to securities laws: Exchanges for securities may include cryptocurrency trading platforms that let users purchase and sell tokens. If so, the platform would have to file an SEC registration form and adhere to other securities regulations.
  • Penalties for non-compliance can be severe: Significant penalties may be imposed for non-compliance: A cryptocurrency corporation might incur severe consequences, such as fines and legal action if it violates federal securities regulations.

Therefore, cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of and comply with federal securities laws in the United States. This includes understanding whether their tokens are considered securities, disclosing the use of funds, and complying with registration and disclosure requirements.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

Biden vows to hold accountable those responsible for SVB, Signature collapse

United States President Joe Biden said on Twitter that he is “firmly committed” to holding those responsible for the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank collapse “fully accountable.”

The president of the United States, Joe Biden, has vowed to hold those responsible for the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank while assuring Americans that their deposits are safe. 

On March 12, the New York District of Financial Services took possession of Signature Bank. The Federal Reserve said that the crypto-friendly bank was closed to protect the U.S. economy and strengthen public confidence in the banking system. 

The Fed also announced a $25 million fund aimed at backstopping certain banks that could face liquidity issues in the future. 

Biden tweeted to his 29.9 million followers on March 13 that he’s pleased that the agencies have “reached a solution that protects workers, small businesses, taxpayers and our financial system.”

The president added he was also “firmly committed” to holding those responsible for the mess “fully accountable.” He added that he would “have more to say” in an address on Monday, March 13. 

Meanwhile, a host of other United States politicians have also shared praise over the recent federal regulator actions aimed at stemming contagion from the recent banking collapses. 

U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown and Representative Maxine Waters said they were also pleased to see that both insured and uninsured SVB depositors would be covered, according to March 12 statement by the U.S. Senate Banking and Housing Committee:

“Today’s actions will enable workers to receive their paychecks and for small businesses to survive, while providing depository institutions with more liquidity options to weather the storm.”

“As we work to better understand all of the factors that contributed to the events of the last several days and how to strengthen guardrails for the largest banks, we urge financial regulators to ensure the banking system remains stable, strong, and resilient, and depositors’ money is safe,” the statement added.

Meanwhile, U.S. Securities Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has used the moment to double down on his agency’s pursuit of wrongdoers, without naming any industries in particular.

The chairman reinforced that the SEC would be on the lookout for violators of U.S. securities laws in a March 12 statement:

“In times of increased volatility and uncertainty, we at the SEC are particularly focused on monitoring for market stability and identifying and prosecuting any form of misconduct that might threaten investors, capital formation, or the markets more broadly.”

“Without speaking to any individual entity or person, we will investigate and bring enforcement actions if we find violations of the federal securities laws,” the SEC chairman added.

The shuttering of SVB temporarily triggered the depegging of Circle's USD Coin (USDC) to as low as $0.88 on March 11, as $3.3 billion of Circle’s $40 billion USDC reserves are held by SVB.

However, USDC is nearly back at $1 after the Federal Reserve confirmed that all customer deposits at Signature Bank and SVB would be made in “whole.”

Related: US Fed announces $25B in funding to backstop banks

Another prominent crypto-bank, Silvergate Bank, announced last week that it would shut down and voluntarily liquidate “in light of recent industry and regulatory developments.”

Shortly after, Gensler wrote a March 9 opinion piece for The Hill that threatened U.S. crypto companies to “do their work within the bounds of the law” or be met with enforcement action.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

CoinEx crypto exchange sued by New York for failing to register with state

The NY Attorney General is looking for a court order to remove the exchange from the state and wants it to block all internet addresses originating from New York.

Cryptocurrency exchange CoinEx has been sued by the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, alleging the firm falsely represented itself as an exchange due to failing to register as a securities and commodities broker-dealer in the state.

A 38-page petition filed by James in the New York Supreme Court on Feb. 22 alleged CoinEx “engaged in repeated and persistent fraudulent practices” and violated the state’s Martin Act — considered one of the most strict anti-fraud and securities regulation laws in the United States.

She also asserted CoinEx listed various tokens that qualified as “both commodities and securities” naming Amp (AMP), LBRY Credits (LBC), Rally (RLY) and Terra (LUNA).

In a Feb. 22 statement, James said CoinEx is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) “as is required under New York law” to sell the tokens.

The Attorney General’s Office created a CoinEx account with a New York-based computer and internet address and alleged it was able to trade on the platform.

“The days of crypto companies like CoinEx acting like the rules do not apply to them are over,” she added.

Related: Rep. Maxine Waters says all US regulators 'better get together on crypto'

The petition also states that CoinEx failed to comply with a Dec. 22, 2022 subpoena sent by the Attorney General’s Office in order to “provide testimony concerning the virtual asset trading activities of its platform.”

“CoinEx was compelled by subpoena to appear for an examination under oath on January 9, 2023, and failed to appear [...] CoinEx’s non-appearance is prima facie proof that CoinEx has engaged in the [mentioned] fraudulent practices.”

In the petition, James is seeking a court order to stop CoinEx from marketing itself as an exchange, prevent it from operating in the state and will order the exchange to geo-block internet addresses and GPS location data originating from New York.

Cointelegraph contacted CoinEx for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

SEC-retly Failing: How the SEC Is Letting Crypto Down

SEC-retly Failing: How the SEC Is Letting Crypto DownWhen Gary Gensler (ex-Goldman Sachs investment banker) was announced as the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February 2021, the crypto industry saw a glimpse of hope. After all, the man in charge of regulating the industry was a “crypto native,” having taught a course on the subject at MIT. However, […]

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

Proposed Israeli law to classify crypto as securities will ‘kill the industry’

A proposed definition change by an Israeli regulator would cause immense harm to the local crypto industry, according to the CEO of Altshuler Shaham Horizon.

Proposed laws in Israel that would see cryptocurrencies classified as securities would cause huge damage to the local crypto industry, according to the chief of an Israeli crypto service provider.

Cointelegraph Magazine editor Andrew Fenton spoke with Ilan Sterk, the CEO of Altshuler Shaham Horizon. The Tel Aviv-based firm provides cryptocurrency custody and trading services and is one of the few firms in the country approved to deal with banks.

Sterk said the current legal situation for crypto in Israel is “quite complicated.”

Altshuler Shaham Horizon CEO Ilan Sterk. Source: Facebook

He explained the current proposal is to have digital assets under the supervision of the Israel Securities Authority (ISA), the nation’s securities regulator.

“To classify a digital asset as a security, it’s changing everything here,” he said. Sterk didn’t think the current proposal would be enacted as is, saying he was “not sure it will be the same as they want to be,” and added:

“You cannot classify all the digital assets as securities because it will kill the industry.”

The ISA released a proposal in early January that would give the regulator sweeping new powers to police the Israeli crypto industry.

It seeks to amend the definition of securities to include “digital assets” used for financial investment. It clarified the definition of “digital assets” as a digital “representation” of value or rights used for financial investment.

The ISA also seeks powers to oversee the crypto industry, to set requirements for issuers and intermediaries and to impose sanctions for non-compliance.

Under the ISA’s proposal, issuers of digital assets would be required to publish a prospectus-like document before issuing or registering digital assets for trading.

The public has until Feb. 12 to provide comments and feedback on the matter.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Finance laid out its recommendations for crypto industry regulations in November last year.

Related: Israeli court rules authorities can seize crypto in 150 blacklisted wallets

Among the proposals was one that would allow crypto service providers to operate in Israel, at least temporarily, if they had a parallel license from abroad.

Sterk said the proposal would “make some lives a little bit easy” regarding the operations of foreign crypto exchanges in Israel as a license in the country “can take up to two, three or four years to get.”

According to the latest January figures from the ISA, it estimated there were around 150 companies operating in the local crypto industry, and more than 200,000 Israelis invested in crypto.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

Ripple’s allies expand: Coinbase files amicus brief in fight against SEC

Crypto exchange Coinbase has filed documentation asking permission to help Ripple Labs in its ongoing legal battle with the SEC.

United States-based crypto exchange Coinbase has become the latest organization to stand behind Ripple Labs in its legal battle against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which could wrap up as soon as the first half of 2023.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer in a series of tweets on Oct. 31 said the exchange had asked the presiding judge for permission to file an amicus brief, saying the case was a “textbook” definition of “just how critical fair notice is.”

An amicus brief, known as a “friend of the court,” is a legal document containing advice or information relating to a court case from an organization or individual that is not directly involved in the case.

Grewal added that a fundamental protection under the U.S. Constitution is that authorities can’t “condemn conduct as a violation of law without providing fair notice that the conduct is illegal.”

“By suing sellers of XRP tokens after making public statements signaling that those transactions were lawful, the SEC has lost sight of this bedrock principle,” he added.

If approved, Coinbase will join the ranks of the non-profit organization Investor Choice Advocates Network and crypto mobile app SpendTheBits which were granted permission to file amicus briefs in October.

Related: ‘Well worth the fight’ — Ripple counsel confirms Hinman docs are in their hands

The filing also comes on the same day cryptocurrency lawyer John Deaton filed a motion seeking permission to submit an amicus brief on behalf of the XRP “decentralized community.”

It also follows days after crypto advocacy group the Blockchain Association also announced its support for Ripple on Oct. 28 by announcing it had filed its ow amicus brief, noting that SEC chairman Gary Gensler’s views on securities laws could have “devastating effects” on the space.

Ripple Labs has been caught up in a nearly two-year-long legal saga with the SEC that regards the sale of its Ripple (XRP) tokens as unregistered securities sales.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse on an Oct. 11 panel at DC Fintech Week said he thinks the case could be wrapped up by the half of 2023 but admitted it would be hard to predict an exact end date.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit

WSJ: Terraform Labs claims case against Do Kwon is ‘highly politicized’

A spokesperson for the company behind Terra said it believes prosecutors heeled to public pressure and expanded the definition of a security after its associated cryptocurrencies collapsed.

Terraform Labs, the company behind the development of the Terra (LUNA) blockchain said South Korea’s case against its co-founder Do Kwon has become political, alleging prosecutors expanded the definition of a security in response to public pressure.

“We believe that this case has become highly politicized, and that the actions of the Korean prosecutors demonstrate unfairness and a failure to uphold basic rights guaranteed under Korean law,” a Terraform Labs spokesman said to The Wall Street Journal on Sept. 28.

South Korean prosecutors issued an arrest warrant for Kwon on Sept. 14 for violations of the countries capital markets laws, but Terraform Labs laid out a defense arguing Terra (now known as Terra Luna Classic (LUNC)) isn’t legally a security, meaning it isn’t covered by capital markets laws.

The spokesman alleged prosecutors of expanding the definition of a security due to intense public pressure from the collapse of Terra and its connected algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST), now known as TerraClassicUSD (USTC).

“We believe, as do most in industry, that Luna Classic is not, and has never been, a security, despite any changes in interpretation that Korean financial officials may have recently adopted.”

The argument by Terraform Labs’ stems from the unclear regulatory status of cryptocurrencies and the companies who create and issue them.

Currently, capital market and electronic securities' systems in the country don’t include a legal definition of non-standardized securities issued through a blockchain.

Related: South Korea's financial watchdog wants to 'quickly' review crypto legislation

The country is moving to regulate the space with its financial regulator, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) preparing guidelines for security tokens by the end of 2022.

A leaked government report in May further revealed South Korea’s plans to roll out a crypto framework by 2024.

Kwon’s whereabouts remain unknown and Terraform Labs did not comment on his location citing physical security risks, but Kwon says he’s not making an effort to hide even after a notice was sent to global authorities by Interpol.

Trump Delivers Speech at Washington Crypto Policy Summit