![Brussels Set to Begin Talks on EU Crypto Tax, Report Reveals Brussels Set to Begin Talks on EU Crypto Tax, Report Reveals](https://static.news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/shutterstock_2172957099-768x432.jpg)
Russia's Central Bank has released a report on digital assets which looks at how the technology could be integrated into its traditional financial system.
The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) is looking at ways to integrate crypto assets and blockchain technology into its local financial system amid a pile-on of global financial sanctions.
In a Telegram post by the CBR on Nov. 7, the central bank shared a public consultation report titled "Digital Assets in Russian Federation."
It considers how the sanction-hit state may possibly open up its domestic market to foreign issuers of digital assets — particularly those from “friendly countries.”
Other areas of focus in the report are digital asset regulation, retail investor protections, digital property rights related to smart contracts and tokenization, as well as reformed accounting and taxation proposals.
The CBR stated that it strongly supports the “further development of digital technologies” provided they don’t create “uncontrollable” financial or cybersecurity risks for consumers.
Despite the nascency of blockchain technology, CBR said the same regulatory rules concerning the issuance and circulation of traditional financial instruments should also extend to digital assets.
The CBR said regulation over the short term should focus on protecting investor rights, strengthen rules for admitting a digital asset into circulation, ensuring the issuer is accredited and ensuring the issuer discloses all relevant information to investors.
The Central Bank's message on Telegram, originally written in Russian, said while the legal framework for digital assets has been created, improved regulation is required for its continued development.
“Russia has created the necessary legal framework for the issuance and circulation of digital assets [...] But so far the market is at the initial stage of its development [...] and is many times inferior to the market of traditional financial instruments. Its further development requires improved regulation.”
As for smart contract regulation, the central bank acknowledged that a legislative framework was already in effect — however, it proposes that Russian-created smart contracts be independently audited before being deployed.
CBR was also positive about the potential for tokenized off-chain assets. However, the bank noted that legislation would need to be put in place to ensure a “legal connection” exists between the token holder and the token itself.
Related: Russian officials approve use of crypto for cross-border payments: Report
The report comes as the Russian Ministry of Finance recently approved the use of cryptocurrencies as a cross-border payment method by Russian residents on Sept. 22.
However, the CBR’s 33-page report made no reference to the increase in sanctions that have been imposed on Russia and the crippling effect it has had on its economy — nor did it discuss the Russia-Ukraine War that is currently taking place in Ukraine.
It however mentions a separate report it is working on, which focuses on Russia’s new central bank digital currency (CBDC) — the digital ruble —which is expected to be piloted in early 2023.
In Aug. 2022, The CBR stated that they plan on rolling out the digital ruble to all Russian-based banks in 2024.
Ethereum's Merge resulted in a Proof-of-Work airdrop. That means you could be on the hook for tokens you didn't even want.
Ethereum’s Merge dominated the crypto world in September with promises of quicker transaction times, improved security and a 99% reduction in energy consumption. However, will you end up with a surprise tax bill too? Let’s examine.
During the Merge event, the Ethereum mainnet — the then current proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain — merged with the proof-of-stake (PoS) Beacon Chain, marking the end of PoW as the consensus mechanism for the Ethereum blockchain.
On the Beacon Chain, Ethereum joined ranks of other major PoS blockchains such as BNB Chain, Cardano and Solana. Ether (ETH) is the second largest cryptocurrency by market cap after Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum is the chain that has spearheaded decentralized finance (DeFi) and nonfungible token (NFT) activity. The Merge heralds ramifications aplenty, but what of the potential tax implications to investors, traders and businesses alike? It’s doubtful anyone will be too pleased with a surprise tax bill — but that is, potentially, exactly what they’ll get.
If we take a short trip down memory lane back to Bitcoin’s civil war in 2017, it eventually concluded in a split in the chain into Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). This event was coined — no pun intended — as a hard fork.
In this instance, new BCH coins were issued to BTC holders and, as a result, this gave rise to taxable income at the fair market value upon receipt of BCH for the recipients. Furthermore, if any BCH holders went on to dispose of their coins, any accumulated gains or losses were subject to capital gains tax.
Related: Post-Merge ETH has become obsolete
Is a civil war brewing among the Ethereum community due to the Merge? There are certainly rumblings, and it looks as though the PoW consensus could continue to be supported by some Ethereum miners. This potential forked version of Ethereum already has the ticker ETHW, which stands for EthereumPoW — with ETHW continuing with the PoW codebase and ETH forking to the new proof-of-stake chain.
The tax implications depend on where you live — your tax residency.
In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has not issued any specific guidance on the Merge per se. However, for ETH holders who receive an equivalent airdrop of ETHW, this is beyond doubt subject to income tax, just like the BCH in 2017. The IRS does have clear guidance on this.
In the United Kingdom, an airdrop of ETHW is treated differently. According to the guidance, it can be inferred that no income tax is applied upon receipt. HM Revenue and Customs has gone one step further and provided some guidance on what it describes as a one-way transfer — citing the Ethereum mainnet to Beacon Chain upgrade. Its view is that section 43 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 will apply to this scenario. Simply put, a taxable event subject to capital gains tax was not triggered by the Merge. Instead, the cost basis of your existing ETH is attributed to your ETHW token and any subsequent disposals will accrue a gain or loss as normal.
Investors and traders can stake (and lock in) their ETH and receive rewards. They should take a conservative approach to these rewards, even if tax guidance is unclear.
For U.S. holders, following the Merge, crypto mining and staking are both subject to income tax upon receipt and capital gains tax (CGT) upon disposal. However, staking is a contentious topic and is subject to an ongoing court cas, so this may be set to change in the future as the case proceeds.
In the U.K., ETH staking and mining rewards are generally miscellaneous income (less certain allowable expenses) and subject to income tax upon receipt and CGT on disposal. However, this also depends on the degree of activity, organization, risk and commerciality.
In a hard fork, the mainnet blockchain becomes part of the newly merged blockchain. All smart contracts along with previous data move over. An Ethereum hard fork is unlike forks we've seen before.
The Merge was a planned upgrade. An ETHW fork most likely lacks the necessary support from exchanges, DeFi protocols and oracles. Just like Bitcoin Cash, ETHW, in my view, will become an insignificant sideshow in the shadow of the prevailing post-Merge PoS chain.
Related: Federal regulators are preparing to pass judgment on Ethereum
Essentially, this type of fork updates the protocol and is intended to be adopted by all. Moving from ETH (PoW) to ETH 2.0 (PoS), token holders convert ETH on a 1:1 basis for ETH 2.0, and the original ETH gets burned in the process.
Investors and businesses should exercise an ounce of prudence and prepare for this scenario by creating a tax liability provision. You will not want to be in a position where a hard fork occurs, and in the worst-case scenario, the value of your Ether declines significantly post-Merge, inhibiting your ability to raise funds to pay your crypto tax bill. Remember, this can only be paid across to your tax agency in fiat currency.
If ETHW proceeds do not become taxable then it’s a simple case of releasing the tax provision and redeploying those funds elsewhere — perhaps to buy more Ether.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Colorado is now accepting crypto for tax payments — but if you choose to use that option, it could change the amount you owe.
Colorado is accepting crypto as payment for any taxes owed to the state as of Sept. 1. It was the result of a promise made earlier in the year by Colorado Governor Jared Polis, who has proven his commitment to establishing the state as pro-cryptocurrency.
Colorado isn’t the only U.S. state trying to incentivize cryptocurrency investment within its borders, as legislatures in Arizona, Wyoming and Utah have all previously introduced bills to accept tax payments in the form of digital currencies in varying degrees.
There is much to gain economically for states who embrace blockchain technology and the crypto sector. Savvy governments are beginning to pitch their locale as the next center of the crypto economy, hoping to attract new businesses and intelligent, young, wealthy constituents involved with crypto.
Taxpayers should be warned, however, of the tax consequences of making payments with crypto, as making such a payment is a taxable event that has the potential to further increase the amount of taxes one has to pay.
Let’s hope more states follow Colorado’s lead, but they should also learn from where Colorado’s initiative falls short. If states, in the future, want to find success in accepting crypto as payment, they need to understand the tax dilemma inherent to making payments with crypto and lean into the solution of accepting stablecoins as a means of payment.
The big knock on states accepting taxes paid in crypto is that using crypto to pay state taxes is considered taxable disposal for individuals — making a payment triggers its own income event.
The IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, which means if the price of the crypto you're using to pay state taxes has appreciated in value over time, you have taxable income equal to how much the price appreciated since you bought it.
It's important for people to know that paying off their tax bill with crypto will trigger another taxable event for the following tax year.
For example, let's say that, after calculating your 2022 taxes, you have a tax bill due to your resident state in the amount of $10,000. You pay this with $10,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) by the due date, April 15, 2023. If you bought that Bitcoin for $2,000, you now have triggered an $8,000 gain by disposing of that Bitcoin. You'll now have to pay tax on your $8,000 gain for the 2023 tax year — solely from paying your taxes with appreciated crypto.
Related: Tax on income you never earned? It’s possible after Ethereum’s Merge
Most people who are invested enough to want to use crypto as their primary payment method very likely have grown their wealth in crypto. These individuals may be hesitant to use their appreciated crypto to pay state taxes in order to avoid the additional tax.
If those who have the ability to pay their taxes in crypto are unlikely to do so, states may find that their initiatives never garner the expected traction. Thus, these programs could end up being more costly than they’re worth.
Currently, the only way to pay your Colorado state taxes in crypto is via PayPal’s “Cryptocurrencies Hub,” which does not include stablecoins as a means of payment. If states decide to accept stablecoins as a means of payment, there is potential that paying with crypto will find success across the nation.
Cryptocurrency tokens pegged to the price of the United States dollar remove tax from the conversation when using crypto to make payments. Although disposing of these stablecoins still needs to be reported on your tax return, stablecoins do not fluctuate materially in value.
Any gain or loss would likely be zero or only a few dollars at most and would not significantly impact how much taxes you pay.
Of course, converting any Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency to a stablecoin is a taxable transaction in itself. Still, it's very likely that, as the crypto ecosystem matures, it will be common for crypto natives to hold a more significant percentage of stablecoins in their overall portfolio.
These crypto natives are looking to cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance as an alternative to the banking system. It's realistic that, in this alternative system, people will hold a certain amount of liquid assets with which to make payments, including their state tax payments.
Related: Biden is hiring 87,000 new IRS agents — And they’re coming for you
When stablecoins are used and no tax bill is involved, paying state taxes with cryptocurrency would no longer be disincentivized by our tax system, and these programs may begin getting the traction they deserve. Many people may decide that the best way to make their tax payments is through crypto.
These states have a lot to gain — if accepting crypto, especially stablecoins, for tax payments is implemented correctly and is successful, states have an opportunity to grow into centers for crypto commerce, all while bringing in additional revenue from a growing economic sector.
Will Colorado and other states find success in accepting crypto tax payments? Or will the tax consequences and crypto being in the midst of a bear market stomp out all potential enthusiasm for such government initiatives?
Let’s root for these states and hope they plan to accept stablecoins. Blockchain technology has the potential to play a significant role in how our governments function in the future. Before our local governments can secure our elections through blockchain, they first have to dip their toes in the water and succeed in accepting tax payments in crypto.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.