1. Home
  2. volatility

volatility

Bitcoin on-chain and options data hint at a decisive move in BTC price

BTC’s historically low volatility could abruptly change in June, with long-term holders making moves and options traders showing an uptick in bearish positions.

Bitcoin’s volatility has dropped to historically low levels thanks to macroeconomic uncertainty and low market liquidity. However, on-chain and options market data allude to incoming volatility in June.

The Bitcoin Volatility Index, which measures the daily fluctuations in Bitcoin’s (BTC) price, shows that the 30-day volatility in Bitcoin’s price was 1.52%, which is less than half of the yearly averages across Bitcoin’s history, with values usually above 4%.

According to Glassnode, the expectation of volatility is a “logical conclusion” based on the fact that low volatility levels were only seen for 19.3% of Bitcoin’s price history.

The latest weekly update from the on-chain analytics firm shows that Glassnode’s monthly realized volatility metric for Bitcoin slipped below the lower bounds of the historical Bollinger Band, suggesting an incoming uptick in volatility.

Bolinger Bands for Bitcoin monthly realized volatility metric. Source: Glassnode

Long-term Bitcoin holders metric points to a price breakout

The on-chain transfer volumes of Bitcoin across cryptocurrency exchanges dropped to historically low levels. The price is also trading near short-term holder bias, indicating a “balanced position of profit and loss for new investors” that bought coins during and after the 2021-2022 bull cycle, according to the report. Currently, 50% of new investors are in profit, with the rest in loss.

However, while the short-term holders reached equilibrium levels, long-term holders were seen making a move in the recent correction, which underpins volatility, according to the analysts.

Glassnode categorizes coins older than 155 days in a single wallet under long-term holder supply.

The gray bars in the image below show the long-term holder (LTH) binary spending indicator, which tracks whether LTH spending averaged over the last seven days is adequate to decrease their total holdings.

It shows previous instances when LTH spending increased, which was usually followed by a volatility uptick.

Long-term holder spending binary indicator. Source: Glassnode

Bitcoin’s recent correction saw a minor downtick in the indicator, “suggesting 4-of-7 days experienced a net divestment by LTHs, which is a level similar to exit liquidity events seen YTD.”

The analysts expect a bout of volatility to reach an equilibrium level, where the market moves primarily due to the accumulation or distribution of long-term holder supply.

Options markets reaffirm traders’ expectation of volatility

The options market data indicates a similar theory about impending volatility.

The latest options market expiry for May turned out to be a dull event, despite a major expiration of $2.3 billion in notional value. However, prolonged compression of volatility can indicate a big incoming move in terms of price.

Bitfinex’s latest Alpha report shows that the DVOL index, which represents the market’s expectation of 30-day future implied Bitcoin volatility, slipped to 45 from a reading of 50 right before the expiry, which represents a yearly low.

The DVOL index for Bitcoin options. Source: Bitfinex

Implied volatility in options refers to the market’s expectation of the future volatility of the underlying asset, as reflected in the prices of options.

Related: Debt ceiling, bank crisis set for 'powder keg' explosion — BitMEX co-founder

Bitfinex analysts said that low expectations of volatility can occur due to “upcoming events that are expected to move the market” or “increased uncertainty or risk aversion among market participants.”

Currently, the options traders are showing risk aversion and have increased their bearish positions, moving from May to June.

The put-to-call ratio for Bitcoin options increased from 0.38 to 0.50. A higher weight of put options shows that traders are increasingly turning bearish on Bitcoin.

Analysts at Bitfinex currently expect “potential market turbulence and short-term price fluctuations” in June, especially close to the expiry toward the month’s end.

The potential price levels that can act as a magnet according to options market positioning are the maximum pain levels for May and June’s expiration at $27,000 and $24,000, respectively.

Maximum pain, also known as max pain or option pain, is a concept used in options trading and refers to the price at which the buyers incur maximum losses.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

Bitcoin options: How to play it when BTC price moves up or down 10%

A perfect storm is forming for higher volatility. Learn how to profit from BTC price moves on either side.

Here’s how Bitcoin (BTC) traders can profit whether its price move up or down 10% within 55 days.

Bitcoin options: Bracing for volatility

Traditional market analysts have started calling for a volatility spike due to the United States government debt discussion.

Moreover, signs of stress coming from the banking sector surprised investors after the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the U.S. dollar against a basket of foreign currencies, reached its lowest level in 12 months at 101 on May 4.

Stock market and macro analyst Markets & Mayhem posted a chart from Deutsche Bank that correlates historical government spending and debt concerns with spikes in the stock market volatility.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has warned that the government may run out of cash by June if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling. According to the BBC, President Joe Biden has called a meeting of congressional leaders on the issue for May 9.

Government officials said the overspending is partly due to lower-than-expected income tax receipts, which are typical of recession periods.

Volatility could impact Bitcoin price, but direction unknown

It is worth noting that the volatility indicator neither dictates whether the market has been gaining strength nor anticipates eventual crashes.

The index calculation does not account for price gains or losses, only directional changes. Thus, if the volatility reaches historically low levels, it merely reflects that the asset has displayed a low amplitude of daily price fluctuations.

Bitcoin 40-day realized volatility. Source: TradingView

Notice how Bitcoin’s 40-day historical volatility does not usually remain below 40% for long. That information, coupled with the traditional markets’ stress caused by the regional banking crisis and the debt ceiling discussion might be brewing the perfect storm for a sharp volatility spike.

While one can benefit from the expectation of higher volatility for the next couple of weeks, most investors are unwilling to take directional bets, meaning they have no confidence in whether the market will move up or down.

However, there is an options strategy that fits this scenario and allows investors to profit from a strong move on either side.

The reverse (short) iron butterfly is a limited-risk, limited-profit options trading strategy. It’s important to remember that options have a set expiration date, meaning the price change must happen during the defined period.

Profit/Loss estimate. Source: Deribit Position Builder

The option prices above were taken on May 5, with Bitcoin trading at $29,172. All options listed are for the June 30 expiry, but this strategy can also be used using a different time frame.

The suggested non-directional strategy consists of selling 9.2 BTC contracts of the $26,000 put options while simultaneously selling 12.2 call options with a $33,000 strike. To finalize the trade, one should buy 13.5 contracts of $30,000 call options and another 8 contracts of $30,000 put options.

While this call option gives the buyer the right to acquire an asset, the contract seller gets a (potential) negative exposure. To fully protect from market oscillations, one must deposit 0.90 BTC (roughly $26,250), representing the investors’ maximum loss.

Conviction is essential, as the risk-reward ratio is reversed

For this investor to profit, one needs Bitcoin’s price to be below $27,000 on June 30 (down 7.5%) or above $32,150 (up 10.2%). In essence, the trade has a hugely profitable area, but loses over twice the potential gain if Bitcoin fails to move either way considerably.

The maximum payout is 0.337 BTC (roughly $9,830), but if a trader is confident that volatility is right around the corner, a 10% move in 55 days seems quite feasible.

Notice that the investor can revert the operation before the options expiry, preferably right after a strong Bitcoin price move. All one needs to do is buy back the two options that have been sold and sell the other two that were previously bought.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

Meme Coin PEPE Surges by 152% This Week, Now the Fifth-Largest Meme Token by Market Cap

Meme Coin PEPE Surges by 152% This Week, Now the Fifth-Largest Meme Token by Market CapPepe (PEPE), the meme coin featuring the popular character Pepe the Frog, has experienced a significant surge in value in the past week, rising by 152.9% against the U.S. dollar. Recent statistics indicate that PEPE’s market capitalization has surged from $141 million on April 22 to a current valuation of $303 million. PEPE Jumps 99% […]

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

Value Locked in Defi Descends Below $50B Range 9 Days After 2023 High  

Value Locked in Defi Descends Below B Range 9 Days After 2023 High  The total value locked in decentralized finance (defi) has descended below the $50 billion range after reaching a 2023 high of $53.63 billion on April 14. This shift has been felt across the board with the top 18 defi protocols recording losses during the past seven days, and the largest defi protocol by TVL size, […]

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

Non-Fungible Token Sales Spiked This Week Despite Crypto Market Volatility 

Non-Fungible Token Sales Spiked This Week Despite Crypto Market Volatility In the midst of a turbulent week for the crypto market, non-fungible token (NFT) sales have shown resilience, experiencing a surge of 7.74% in weekly sales, totaling $181.82 million. Data also reveals that there has been an increase of 41% in NFT buyers over the course of the week, surpassing the number of buyers recorded […]

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

OKX launches AI integration to monitor market volatility

Cryptocurrency exchange OKX announced a new integration aimed to help users monitor market volatility in real-time via advanced AI algorithms.

After the latest update of the infamous artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT-4, the technology has been a buzzword inside and outside the crypto industry. While opinions on the technology may be mixed, companies continue to integrate AI to enhance their user experience.

On March 31, the cryptocurrency exchange and Web3 technology company OKX announced that it will be launching a new integration from EndoTech.io which utilizes AI algorithms to capture crypto market volatility.

The algorithms incorporate both machine learning and “other advanced techniques” in an effort to conduct real-time analyses of data and trading opportunities.

According to Dmitry Gooshchin, chief operating officer of EndoTech.io, understanding market volatility is “essential for successful trading in the crypto space."

OKX also jumped on the AI bandwagon on March 30 when it posted an AI-generated poem from ChatGPT-4 about the company’s wallet.

This new platform update comes only a few days after the company announced its intention to expand its services to Australia while beginning to shut down its former operations in Canada.

AI is finding various use cases in the crypto industry, not just for identifying real-time market volatility. It’s also used to track blockchain transactions, deploy autonomous economic agents for trading and more.

Related: OKX latest proof of reserves reveals $8.9B in assets

In everyday life, it’s now used for personal assistant-like tasks, social media and customer service needs, among other use cases.

While some have a more positive outlook on the impact of AI technology in scenarios like the metaverse, a letter recently emerged signed by 2,600 researchers and leaders in fintech calling for a pause in AI development.

The primary concern the collective of industry professionals voiced was that “human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity,” among others.

Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

Betting on turmoil: Deribit launches Bitcoin volatility futures

Volatility products are popular with traditional investors, as they enable portfolio hedging, risk management and speculation.

Crypto derivatives exchange Deribit will soon launch Bitcoin (BTC) volatility futures, giving investors a direct way to measure and trade BTC market volatility. 

On March 17, Deribit introduced BTC DVOL futures — a derivatives contract built on the Deribit Bitcoin Volatility Index, which measures the implied volatility of the largest cryptocurrency. Deribit’s volatility gauge provides a 30-day outlook on investors’ expectations for annualized volatility.

Like other volatility products, BTC DVOL can potentially help traders with risk management, portfolio hedging or market speculation.

Volatility-as-an-asset is widely traded in traditional finance, with the most popular product being the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, also known as VIX. The VIX fluctuates on a scale of 1-100, with 20 representing the historical average. Readings below 20 signal lower implied volatility than the historical mean. Readings above 20 are usually associated with more turbulent financial conditions; anything above 30 signals significant market volatility, usually due to uncertainty, risk, or investor fear.

VIX measures the volatility of S&P 500 Index options, a leading indicator of the U.S. stock market.

Traditional markets have battled extreme volatility over the past 12 months, marked by major fluctuations in the S&P 500 Index and broader stock market. Source: Yahoo Finance.

Bitcoin and the broader crypto markets have exhibited extreme volatility over the past 12 months. The period known as crypto winter is usually associated with deep corrections in digital asset prices following an over-extended bullish phase.

Related: Crypto acted as safe haven amid SVB and Signature bank run: Cathie Wood

Although crypto investment products experienced record outflows last week following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, regulatory clarity on investor deposits has helped Bitcoin stage a large relief rally. Bitcoin’s price crossed $27,000 on March 17 for the first time in over nine months.

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

US lawmaker suggests Signature’s collapse was tied to instability of crypto

Senator Michael Bennet said crypto was not “even as stable as the marijuana industry,” questioning Signature Bank’s ability to service digital asset firms but not dispensaries.

Michael Bennet, a United States senator representing the state of Colorado, has suggested that banks associated with crypto firms did not make “prudentially sound” decisions.

Speaking at a March 16 hearing of the Senate Finance Committee, Bennet brought up the recent closure of the crypto-friendly Signature Bank with lawmakers and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a discussion of U.S. President Joe Biden’s FY 2024 budget. The Colorado senator drew a comparison between the relationship of banks and crypto companies to that of institutions and marijuana dispensaries — a legal service in many U.S. states that is “frozen out of the financial system”.

“Signature Bank failed and almost a fifth of its deposits came from crypto,” said Bennet. “They’re not allowed to do anything with marijuana, but apparently they can lay 20% of this on crypto — a notoriously unstable [...] thing that nobody here even understands and where the value of the assets can soar and collapse.”

Senator Michael Bennet addressing the Senate Finance Committee on March 16

According to Bennet, crypto was not “even as stable as the marijuana industry,” implying it may have been a factor in the collapse of Signature Bank. However, Signature board member and former U.S. Representative Barney Frank said there was no issue regarding Signature’s solvency at the time the New York Department of Financial Services took control of the bank on March 12.

Related: California cannabis producer adopts blockchain to track its weed

The failure of Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate Bank and their ties to crypto firms have been part of discussions among industry experts, regulators, and lawmakers addressing the potential impact on the U.S. financial system. Many in the crypto and blockchain space have argued that government officials were looking to “de-bank” crypto companies, which could have far-reaching implications.

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure

How and why do stablecoins depeg?

Discover the causes and mechanisms behind stablecoin depegging.

Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to have a stable value relative to a specific asset or a basket of assets, typically a fiat currency such as the U.S. dollar, euro or Japanese yen.

Stablecoins are designed to offer a “stable” store of value and medium of exchange compared with more traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), which can be highly volatile.

Fiat money, cryptocurrencies, and commodities like gold and silver are examples of assets used to collateralize or “back” stablecoins. Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC) and Dai (DAI) are a few examples of stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar.

Stablecoins can also be algorithmically stabilized through smart contracts and other mechanisms that automatically adjust the supply of the stablecoin to maintain its peg to the underlying asset.

Despite the potential benefits, stablecoins are not without risks. The most significant risk with any stablecoin is the potential for its peg to break, causing it to lose its value relative to the underlying asset.

Depegging is where the value of a stablecoin deviates significantly from its pegged value. This can happen for various reasons, including market conditions, liquidity issues and regulatory changes.

USDC is a fully reserved-backed stablecoin, meaning every USD Coin is backed by actual cash and short-dated United States treasuries. Despite this, USDC issuers, Circle, announced on March 10 that USDC had depegged from the U.S. dollar, with around $3.3 billion of its $40 billion in USDC reserves stuck in the now defunct Silicon Valley Bank. The bank — the 16th-largest in the U.S. — collapsed on March 10, and is one of the biggest bank failures in U.S. history. Given USDC’s collateral influence, other stablecoins followed suit in depegging from the U.S. dollar.

Related: USDC depegs as Circle confirms $3.3B stuck with Silicon Valley Bank

MakerDAO — a protocol based on the Ethereum blockchain — issues DAI, an algorithmic stablecoin designed to preserve a precise 1:1 ratio with the U.S. dollar. However, DAI also fell off its peg amid the Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse, mainly due to a contagion effect from USDC’s depegging. Over 50% of the reserves backing DAI are held in USDC.

Tether issues USDT, with every USDT token equivalent to a corresponding fiat currency at a 1:1 ratio and fully backed by Tether’s reserves. However, USDT also experienced a depegging in 2018, which raises concerns about the overall stability mechanism of stablecoins.

Importance of stablecoin pegs

The importance of stablecoin pegs is in providing a stable and predictable value relative to an underlying asset or basket of assets — typically a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. Stablecoins are a desirable alternative for various use cases, including cryptocurrency trading, payments and remittances, due to their stability and predictability.

With stablecoin pegs, traders may enter and exit positions without being subjected to the price fluctuations of cryptocurrencies like BTC or ETH. This is important for institutional investors and companies that depend on a reliable store of value and a medium of exchange to run their operations.

Cross-border transactions can also be made more accessible using stablecoin pegs, especially in nations with volatile currencies or restricted access to conventional financial services. Compared with more traditional methods like wire transfers or remittance services, stablecoins can offer a more effective and affordable way to make payments and transfer value across borders.

Stablecoin pegs can also increase financial inclusion, especially for people and enterprises without access to traditional financial services. Stablecoins can be used to make payments and transact in digital assets without requiring a bank account or credit card, which can be crucial in developing and emerging markets.

Why do stablecoins depeg?

Stablecoins can depeg due to a combination of micro and macroeconomic factors. Micro factors include shifts in market conditions, such as an abrupt increase or decrease in stablecoin demand, problems with liquidity and modifications to the underlying collateral. Macro variables involve changes in the overall economic landscape, such as inflation or interest rate increases.

For instance, a stablecoin’s price can momentarily exceed its pegged value if demand spikes due to increased cryptocurrency trading activity. Yet, the stablecoin’s price could drop below its fixed value if insufficient liquidity matches heightened demand.

On the macroeconomic front, if there is high inflation, the purchasing power of the underlying assets that support the stablecoin may drop, leading to a depeg event. Similarly, adjustments to interest rates or other macroeconomic measures may impact stablecoin demand.

Regulatory changes or legal issues can also cause a stablecoin to depeg. For example, if a government were to ban the use of stablecoins, demand for the stablecoin would drop, causing its value to fall. A depegging event can also be caused by technical problems like smart contract bugs, hacking attacks and network congestion. For instance, a smart contract flaw could result in the stablecoin’s value being computed improperly, causing a sizable departure from its peg.

How do stablecoins depeg?

Stablecoin depegging typically occurs in a few steps, which may vary depending on the specific stablecoin and the circumstances that lead to the depegging event. The following are some general features of a depegging event:

The stablecoin’s value deviates from its peg

As noted, many factors, such as market turbulence, technological problems, a lack of liquidity and regulatory problems, may result in a stablecoin depeg. The value of the stablecoin may change dramatically relative to the pegged asset or basket of assets.

Traders and investors react to the depegging event

Whether they think the stablecoin’s value will eventually return to its peg or continue to diverge from it, traders and investors may respond by purchasing or selling the stablecoin when it dramatically departs from its peg.

Arbitrage opportunities arise

Arbitrage opportunities could materialize if the stablecoin’s value drifts away from its peg. For instance, traders may sell the stablecoin and purchase the underlying asset to benefit if the stablecoin’s value is higher than its peg.

The stablecoin issuer takes action

The stablecoin issuer may take action to rectify the problem if the stablecoin’s value continues to stray from its peg. This may entail changing the stablecoin’s supply, the collateralization ratio and other actions to boost trust in the stablecoin.

The stablecoin’s value stabilizes

If traders and investors adjust their positions and the stablecoin issuer responds to the depegging event, the value of the stablecoin may stabilize. The stablecoin’s value might return to its peg if the stablecoin issuer successfully wins back public trust.

Risks and challenges associated with stablecoins depegging

Depegging stablecoins can present several risks and difficulties for investors, traders and the larger cryptocurrency ecosystem:

  • Market volatility: When stablecoins depeg, the market may experience severe turbulence as traders and investors alter holdings in response to the depegging event. This could lead to market uncertainty and raise the possibility of losses.
  • Reputation risk: Depegging stablecoins risks the issuers’ and the larger cryptocurrency ecosystem’s reputation. This may make it harder for stablecoin issuers to draw in new users and investors and decrease the market’s total value.
  • Liquidity risk: Liquidity issues may arise if a stablecoin depegs because traders and investors sell the stablecoin in significant quantities. As a result, the value of the stablecoin may decrease, making it challenging for traders and investors to liquidate their holdings.
  • Counterparty risk: Traders and investors may be exposed to the risk of default by the stablecoin issuer or other parties participating in the stablecoin’s operation due to the depeg event.
  • Regulatory risk: Stablecoins depegging can also bring about regulatory problems. Governments and authorities may impose restrictions on stablecoins if they believe that the assets threaten the stability of the broader financial system.

Related: Circle’s USDC instability causes domino effect on DAI, USDD stablecoins

Considering the above risks, investors and traders alike should keep a close eye on the performance of stablecoins in their portfolios. Research the stablecoin issuer and its collateralization, and be on the lookout for any indications of depegging or other problems that might impact the stablecoin’s value. They can also think about diversifying their holdings by using a variety of stablecoins or other assets. This can lessen the chance of suffering losses in a stablecoin depegging event.

The Graph introduces GRC-20 standard for Web3 data structure