1. Home
  2. YouTube

YouTube

YouTube says creators must disclose gen AI use or face suspension

YouTube’s updated community guidelines include new disclosure requirements for AI-generated content, its new standards for “sensitive topics,” and the removal of deep fakes.

YouTube, the video streaming social platform, released new community guidelines relating to the disclosure of artificial intelligence (AI) used in content. 

The platform published a blog on Nov. 14 saying that the updates will have creators on its platform inform their viewers if the content that is being shown is “synthetic.”

“We’ll require creators to disclose when they've created altered or synthetic content that is realistic, including using AI tools.”

An example given in the update was an ai-generated video that “realistically depicts” something that never happened or content of a person saying or doing something that they did not.

This information will be displayed for viewers in two ways, according to YouTube, with the first being a new label added to the description panel and if the content is about “sensitive topics” a more prominent label to the video player.

Sensitive topics according to YouTube include political elections, “ongoing conflicts,” public health crisis and public officials. 

YouTube says it will work with creators to help its community better understand the new guidelines, however it said for anyone who does not abide by the rules their content is subject to removal, “suspension from the YouTube Partner Program, or other penalties.”

Related: Google sues scammers over creation of fake Bard AI chatbot

The platform also touched on the topic of AI-generated deep fakes, which have become both increasingly common and realistic. It said they’re integrating a new feature that will allow users to request the removal of a synthetic video that “simulates an identifiable individual, including their face or voice, using our privacy request process.”

Recently, multiple celebrities and public figures such as Tom Hanks, Mr. Beast, Gayle King, Jennifer Aniston and more have battled with deep fake videos of themselves endorsing products.

AI-generated content has also been a thorn in the side of the music industry over the last year, as many deep fakes of artists using illegal vocal or track samples have also plagued the internet.

In its updated community guidelines YouTube says it will also remove AI-generated music or content that mimics an artist’s unique singing or rapping voice as requested by its “music partners.”

Over the summer YouTube began working on its principles for working with the music industry on AI technology. Alongside the community guidelines, YouTube recently released new experimental AI chatbots that chat with viewers while watching a video.

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

YouTube is testing experimental AI that chats with you about what you’re watching

Google’s also testing a tool that will help creators manage their comment sections.

Google’s testing a pair of experimental artificial intelligence (AI) systems for creators and viewers on its YouTube video sharing platform. 

The first experiment, according to a post on YouTube Help, involves an “AI that organizes large comment sections of long-form videos into easily digestible themes.” This tool will allow content creators to organize their comment sections by topic, highlight specific comments, and even delete comments related to a given topic.

This experiment is currently active and “running on a small number of videos in English that have large comment sections.” YouTube Premium subscribers can opt in as part of YouTube’s experimental features program.

Meanwhile, the second appears slightly more ambitious. It comes in the form of a generative AI chatbot, ostensibly similar to Google’s Bard or OpenAI’s ChatGPT, whose aim is to interact with viewers while they watch videos.

According to YouTube:

“To help you dive deeper into the content you’re watching, we’re experimenting with a conversational AI tool. This tool lets you get answers to questions about the video you’re watching, recommendations for related content, and more, all without interrupting playback.”

The chatbot can also provide increased interactivity such as creating quizzes for users watching certain academic videos.

This experiment is currently active for a “small number of people on a subset of videos” and, according to YouTube, will be rolling out more widely in the coming weeks to Premium subscribers in the U.S. on the Android platform.

There’s no mention as to whether these features are planned for wide scale implementation and YouTube appears quick to offer the standard, boilerplate warning that the new features are experimental and “we may not always get it right.”

Related: Xbox to enhance game dialogues with generative AI through new partnership

While many YouTube denizens may welcome the tools, it’s worth noting that there’s little in the way of public testing when it comes to AI systems that interact with both the general public and video/audio content at scale. It’ll be interesting to see how YouTube navigates the sometimes unpredictable outputs produced by generative AI systems.

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

Keep it simple: Cryptonauts shares tips on growing a crypto YouTube channel

Cryptonauts co-founder Nathan Leung tells The Agenda how and why his team creates crypto content for the culture.

While the term “fake news” has been floating around for a while, the phrase was given new life and popularity when former United States President Donald Trump turned it into a viral campaign slogan. “Fake news” eventually became a generation-defining meme, and this is likely because there is a certain truth to the phrase that resonates with the public to this day.

Media does occasionally make mistakes in its reporting, and even Cointelegraph is not immune to this. At the same time, news anchors, journalists and media companies are also known to cast aside objectivity and inject their personal opinions — or those of their paid sponsors — into what is promoted as strictly fact-based news.

In 2023, this has become a crisis facing crypto content creators. The proverbial “jig” is up, and many investors are now well aware that much crypto-focused content has an ulterior motive of shilling a particular coin or, in some cases, an unannounced paid sponsor backing the content of the day. As a result of the broader fallout, several professional and hobbyist crypto content creators have told The Agenda that maintaining and growing their subscribers has been a challenge this year.

On Episode 22 of The Agenda, hosts Ray Salmond and Jonathan DeYoung spoke with Nathan Leung, co-founder and host of the Cryptonauts YouTube channel, about the nuts and bolts of educating and onboarding new users to crypto on YouTube — and how to remain ethical while doing so.

Humanizing is appetizing

Leung told The Agenda that when attempting to separate oneself from all the chaff, “humanizing” the content is a useful and effective tactic, given that “in times like this, everyone’s like, ‘NFTs are a scam, blah, blah, blah. Everything’s a scam.’” But as he points out, “There’s also good people trying to make digital ownership a real thing. There’s actually builders actually running hackathons, trying to find the best project, right? There’s actually real builders who want this technology to kind of help the world in a way.”

So, Cryptonauts talks to these builders and highlights that they are just regular people with a mission. “It’s kind of just humanizing. It’s like, yeah, you’re worth $250 million or $18 billion, right? But what do you do? Do you wake up in the morning? Do you have a family? Do you walk your dog?”

Related: The Agenda podcast predicts the future of crypto and talks adoption

Leung also emphasized the importance of respecting “the viewer’s time,” highlighting that the ultimate goal is to have viewers watch a whole video and not feel like their time was wasted.

“If they’re going to watch our video, we want them to at least watch it all, right? So, if we feel like it’s not absolutely necessary, we don’t want to waste their time either, because time is obviously the most valuable currency. So, we just try to make it short and sweet.”

He added, “I think a lot of people think that longer videos are better, but I think if you can just save people time and condense it and just make it engaging, it could be two minutes.”

Why Cryptonauts values organic growth over paid shilling

While many crypto content creators have been exposed for shilling their bags or accepting money under the table to promote other projects’ tokens, Leung says Cryptonauts doesn’t have this issue because they don’t depend on sponsored content for money.

“So, I think we had one rule: We said we would never do ICOs [initial coin offerings] very early on. We would only cover projects that were already listed and already launched, which turned out to be a good one. And we also kind of made it our fundamental rule not to push any exchanges — you saw what happened with FTX.”

Placing authenticity and enjoyment over monetization, Leung said, “We just do what we want, and we tell the stories we want. We just want to tell some good stories, make some good content and have fun while doing it. I think that’s the most important thing because money can’t buy passion.”

Despite admitting that “people don’t really care about crypto” right now when asked about Cryptonauts’ goals for the future, Leung said that the channel is “really trying to unite the crypto community.”

“I think we want to start doing something a little bit different. Just to kind of practice what we preach. If we are about community, we should start doing some real-life events.”

To hear more from Leung’s conversation with The Agenda — including Cryptonauts’ future vision for combining real-life experiences with crypto content and giving back to its community — listen to the full episode on Cointelegraph’s Podcasts page, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows!

Magazine: Singer Vérité’s fan-first approach to Web3, music NFTs and community building

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

Ben Armstrong spends night in jail with prowling, simple assault charges

Crypto influencer Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong was released on bail around 8 hours after being booked by Gwinnett County police for loitering and simple assault.

Crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, formerly known as ‘BitBoy,’ reportedly spent the night in the slammer and has been hit with two charges following his conspicuous arrest. 

Armstrong, who was taken into custody on Sept. 25 while livestreaming outside a former associate’s house, spent a little over 8 hours in a cell according to the Gwinnett County, Georgia, Sheriff's Office.

The crypto influencer has been released on bail but has been hit with charges of “loitering/prowling” and “simple assault by placing another in fear,” with a bond amount of $2,600 along with $40 of fees.

Screenshot from Gwinnett County Sheriff's Office

In Georgia, loitering or prowling generally refers to when a person is “in a place at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals under circumstances that warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity,” according to Georgia-based law firm Lawson & Berry. 

The consequences for a prowling and loitering misdemeanor include a fine of up to $1,000, or jail time of up to one year, or both, it added.

Meanwhile, simple assault can involve: “(1) attempt to commit a violent injury to the person of another, or (2) commit an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.”

Similar to loitering, a conviction for simple assault in Georgia is treated as a misdemeanor, though there can be certain situations where this is escalated, said the law firm.

Following his release, Armstrong appeared to mock his punishment stating, “My name is Ben and I’m a loiterer. I did 8 whole hours in the slammer,”

A few hours later he posted: “I’m taking a week's break from social media,” before adding “No, not because of the memes,” on Sept. 27. Armstrong’s mug shot has been doing the rounds on crypto social media.

Related: Ben ‘BitBoy’ Armstrong arrested on livestream over Lambo dispute

On the evening of Sept. 25, Armstrong went to the house of his former associate Carlos Diaz who he alleged had possession of his Lamborghini.

The livestream and general ranting went on for around 19 minutes before the local police turned up and arrested Armstrong.

Crypto trader “EmperorBTC” told his 360,000 X followers that the arrest “should be a lesson for everyone.”

The latest debacle is related to the ongoing dispute between Ben Armstrong and Hit Network which controls the “BitBoy Crypto" brand. The firm and its executives cut ties with Armstrong in August citing issues surrounding substance abuse and financial damage to employees.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

Ben ‘BitBoy’ Armstrong arrested on livestream over Lambo dispute

Crypto influencer Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong has reportedly been arrested following a livestream outside the house of Carlos Diaz, a former business partner.

Crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, previously known as “BitBoy,” has reportedly been arrested while livestreaming outside the house of a former business associate, who he alleges is in possession of his Lamborghini.

Before the YouTube stream, he posted that he was “going live soon from a very special location.”

Less than an hour later, Armstrong was livestreaming himself at the residence of consultant and nonfungible token investor Carlos Diaz, who is understood to have links to the Hit Network.

Armstrong went on a tirade, claiming that Diaz “wanted to kill him” and alleging he has links with the Houston mafia.

“I’m not scared of you, Carlos,” he hollered.

At almost 19 minutes into the stream, Armstrong was met with local police, who turned up and asked if Armstrong had a weapon on him, which he denied.

He was then ordered to put down the phone, and the stream goes blank for the remaining 17 minutes, though audio can still be heard of a conversation between Armstrong and the police officers.

According to a listing on the Gwinnett County, Georgia, Sheriff’s Office, a Benjamin Charles Armstrong was booked on Sept. 25 at 9:11 pm local time and remains incarcerated.

Screenshot from Gwinnett County Sheriff’s Office.

On Sept. 26, Diaz posted a confirmation that Armstrong had turned up at his house.

Blockchain sleuth "ZachXBT", who is not a fan, said "Will always celebrate one of the most notorious bad actors in crypto finally getting karma."

Related: BitBoy Crypto brand will no longer include YouTuber Ben Armstrong

In late August, Hit Network, which controls the “BitBoy Crypto” brand, cut ties with its public face, Ben Armstrong, citing issues surrounding substance abuse and financial damage to employees.

Since then, a couple of lawsuits have been filed and retracted by various parties involved. Armstrong even appealed for donations on Sept. 20 to cover his legal battles, which riled the crypto community.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

BitBoy Crypto brand will no longer include YouTuber Ben Armstrong

The crypto influencer brand had a reach of more than 3.3 million followers at the time the company announced Ben Armstrong would no longer be affiliated with “BitBoy Crypto."

The parent of Hit Network, which controls the “BitBoy Crypto" brand, has cut ties with its public face, Ben Armstrong, citing issues surrounding substance abuse and financial damage to employees.

In an Aug. 28 announcement on YouTube and social media channels, a spokesperson said the company had reached its decision following efforts to assist Armstrong “during his relapse into substance abuse,” expressing regret for the end of the business relationship. The firm claimed Armstrong had inflicted “emotional, physical and financial damage” on Hit employees and others in the space.

The announcement did not elaborate on any incidents that may have led to the end of the business relationship with Armstrong. The crypto YouTuber had been involved in a class-action lawsuit in which investors claimed Armstrong and other influencers allegedly promoted FTX without revealing compensation from the exchange.

Amid the lawsuit, court filings suggested Armstrong issued threats against lawyers representing the plaintiffs and openly mocked a federal judge’s authority by not appearing in court as ordered. The case was stayed on June 16.

Using his platform with more than 1 million followers on X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube subscribers, Armstrong insulted high-profile figures, including European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde and United States Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler. In August 2022, he filed a defamation suit against YouTuber Erling Mengshoel Jr., also known as "Atozy," but dropped the case after Mengshoel Jr. raised more than $200,000 for his defense.

Related: Former SEC chief warns influencers about prosecution for crypto price manipulation

Many X and YouTube users reacted with support for Armstrong following the Aug. 28 announcement, expressing concern with the future of the "BitBoy Crypto” brand without its most recognizable face. Armstrong launched his YouTube channel in February 2018, and as of August 2023, the BitBoy Crypto brand had a total social reach of more than 3.3 million followers. 

It’s unclear if Armstrong’s previous legal entanglements may have contributed to the company cutting ties with him. Many authorities worldwide have been targeting crypto influencers for promoting allegedly fraudulent projects following the collapse of FTX.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

YouTube releases ‘principles’ for working with music industry on AI tech

The streaming platform revealed three key principles it will abide by as it works with major figures in the music industry to better grasp AI technologies.

YouTube released its “principles” for working with players in the music industry on artificial intelligence (AI) technology, on Aug. 21. 

The CEO of YouTube, Neal Mohan, outlined in a blog post that now is a critical time to “ boldly embrace this technology with a continued commitment to responsibility.”

Mohan said he has been in close contact with partners in the music industry, including Universal Music, to create a framework with three major principles surrounding AI to work toward “common goals.”

“These three fundamental AI principles serve to enhance music’s unique creative expression while also protecting music artists and the integrity of their work.”

The principles are to embrace AI responsibly alongside partners in the music industry, including appropriate protections for artists that “unlock opportunities” for music partners and scaling content policies to meet the “challenges of AI.”

Included in its first principle, YouTube announced it will be introducing a new “Music AI Incubator” to inform its approach to working with AI. The incubator will work with “some of music’s most innovative artists, songwriters, and producers across the industry.”

This includes the composer Max Richter and singer-songwriter Rosanne Cash among others.

Mohan closed by saying he is “incredibly excited” about how AI presents opportunities to “supercharge creativity” around the world. 

Related: Meta launches suite of generative AI music tools rivaling Google’s MusicLM

Although the YouTube CEO expressed excitement and praise for the emerging technology, he also expressed that he believes AI won’t be a replacement for human creativity.

“AI will never replace human creativity because it will always lack the essential spark that drives the most talented artists to do their best work, which is intention."

In an interview with Cointelegraph, the CEO of the Grammy’s echoed this sentiment and said that there is “something about the human experience and the emotion and the heart that comes from what we do and what we contribute to the music that I don’t think can be replicated yet.”

In July, the Grammy’s clarified its rules by saying that music with AI components is eligible for an award, depending on the use of the technology and the award category for which it is nominated.

Earlier this month on Aug. 9, Universal Music Group announced that it is in talks with Google over a deal to collaborate in combating AI deep fakes.

Magazine: BitCulture: Fine art on Solana, AI music, podcast + book reviews

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

Google responds to accusations of ads tracking data of children

After an in-depth report surfaced over YouTube advertisers potentially harvesting data from children, Google responded by saying it has “strict policies” over children’s content.

Google, the parent company of YouTube, responded to a report that suggested YouTube advertisers are sourcing data from children viewing videos on the platform. 

On Aug. 18, a day after the report surfaced, Google posted a blog reinstating its “strict privacy standards around made for kids content,” which is content marked on YouTube that is created to be viewed by children.

The BigTech giant said it has focused on creating kid-specific products like YouTube Kids and supervised accounts.

“We’ve invested a great deal of time and resources to protect kids on our platforms, especially when it comes to the ads they see…”

It also said it launched a restriction worldwide for personalized ads and age-sensitive ad categories for its users under 18.

It also said it launched a restriction worldwide for personalized ads and age-sensitive ad categories for its users under 18. Additionally, the post clarified that it does not allow third-party trackers on ads that appear on kids' content. 

Nonetheless, Adalytics, a data analysis and transparency platform, on Aug. 17 published the 206-page report alleging that advertisers on YouTube could be “inadvertently harvesting data from millions of children.”

Some of the claims made by the report include the presence of cookies indicating a “breakdown” of privacy and YouTube creating an “undisclosed persistent, immutable unique identifier” that gets transmitted to servers even on made-for-kids videos with no clarity on why it's collecting it.

Related: Universal Music and Google in talks over deal to combat AI deep fakes: Report

An article from the New York Times also reported on the research from Adalytics, specifically highlighting an instance where an adult-targeted ad from a Canadian bank was shown to a viewer on a video label for kids.

Adalytics reported that since that viewer clicked on the ad, tracking software from Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with companies, was tagged on the user’s browser.

Concerns around Google’s privacy and data collection standards have been raised in recent months, as the company has been releasing more products with artificial intelligence (AI) incorporated.

On July 11, Google was hit with a lawsuit over its new AI data-scraping privacy policy updates, with the prosecutors saying its representing millions of users who have had their privacy and property rights violated due to the changes. 

Less than a month later, a report was published that analyzed AI-powered extensions for Google’s internet browser Chrome, which said two-thirds could endanger user security.

Most recently, on Aug. 15, Google introduced a series of enhancements for its search engine that incorporate advanced generative AI features.

Magazine: Should we ban ransomware payments? It’s an attractive but dangerous idea

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

YouTube helps recover hacked channel that attempted XRP crypto scams

YouTube’s swift intervention ensured damage control by preventing XRP hackers from interacting with the channel’s subscribers.

Prominent YouTuber DidYouKnowGaming was able to regain access to his YouTube channel, which an anonymous bad actor hacked to promote XRP (XRP) cryptocurrency scams.

While hacking into YouTube channels to promote scams has been a long-standing method of targeting unwary investors, the number of creators on the platform reporting hacks has increased. Most recently, DidYouKnowGaming — a YouTuber with 2.4 million subscribers — warned his Twitter followers about a hack.

After gaining access to the account, the hacker changed the YouTuber’s profile and cover images to Ripple’s logo, as shown below.

Hacked YouTube account of DidYouKnowGaming. Source: Twitter

YouTube’s swift intervention ensured damage control by preventing XRP hackers from interacting with the channel’s subscribers. Recently, one of the largest YouTube creators, Linus Tech Tips, also reported losing access to his channels.

While the exploit used by the hackers to gain access to YouTube accounts remains a mystery, the victim YouTubers have always been able to recover their accounts and deleted videos, if any.

The threat to crypto investors from such hacks is prominent, considering the rise of deepfakes, which are fake impersonation videos generated by artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

Hackers often create deepfakes of Tesla CEO Elon Musk and other entrepreneurs to misguide crypto investors.

Concerns escalated as Chinese tech giant Tencent launched a new deepfakes creation tool, allowing users to impersonate anyone for 1,000 yuan ($145).

Deepfake version (left) created by Tencent Cloud’s AI service. Source: Tencent (via Jiemian) 

As reported by Cointelegraph, the service will be used by Tencent to host live-streamed infomercials for the Chinese demographic.

Related: Here’s how to quickly spot a deepfake crypto scam — cybersecurity execs

Crypto investors across the world use YouTube to learn about and research the world of cryptocurrencies, blockchain and Web3.

To learn more about Web3 development, check out these five YouTube channels that can help investors and enthusiasts with their research.

Magazine: Shirtless shitposting and hunting SBF on the meme streets: Gabriel Haines, Hall of Flame

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether

‘BitBoy Crypto’ intentionally misses court appearance to address alleged harassment

YouTuber and Crypto Twitter personality Ben Armstrong openly mocked a federal judge's authority, tweeting pictures of himself on a beach during an ordered court appearance.

Ben Armstrong, also known as ‘BitBoy Crypto’, missed a court appearance ordered by a federal magistrate judge in response to the YouTuber’s alleged harassment of counsel in a lawsuit involving several crypto influencers.

Judge Melissa Damian had ordered Armstrong and his counsel to appear on April 20 to address the YouTuber’s “harassment towards plaintiffs’ counsel.” However, Armstrong openly mocked the order on social media, instead tweeting pictures of himself on a beach in the Bahamas.

According to various reports, Judge Damian warned Armstrong’s attorney — who was in attendance, as ordered — that she would issue a warrant for the YouTuber’s arrest if he failed to appear by April 24. The harassment case against Armstrong moved forward without him as the judge reportedly referred the matter to the FBI.

Individuals affected by the collapse of FTX filed a class-action lawsuit against Armstrong and several other YouTubers in March for allegedly promoting fraud through the exchange “without disclosing compensation.” Moskowitz, the lead attorney representing the plaintiffs in that case, claimed that Armstrong harassed the legal team with “endless phone calls, tweets and emails,” voicemails “full of vulgarities,” and social media posts suggesting threats.

Amid court proceedings on April 20, the YouTuber continued to mock the harassment case and Moskowitz. However, he said that he was “not flying by the seat of [his] pants,” hinting that his absence from court may have been with the advice of counsel. He reportedly offered through counsel to appear before the judge in May.

As part of the judge’s order on April 20, Armstrong will reportedly be barred from tweeting about Moskowitz and the plaintiffs in the case. He previously compared the lawyer to an ambulance chaser and a pig in addition to largely dismissing the basis of the lawsuit. Cointelegraph reached out to Moskowitz for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

Related: Multiple Silvergate lawsuits over alleged FTX ties combined by judge

A crypto influencer with more than 1 million followers on Twitter and 1.4 million YouTube subscribers, Armstrong is no stranger to online controversy. He has insulted high-profile figures including European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chair Gary Gensler in addition to others affecting policy in the space.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

Rumble secures $775 million investment from Tether