SBF’s neurodivergence saw him ‘misinterpreted’ at trial, doctors argue
The court and jury could have misunderstood Sam Bankman-Fried’s behavior during his criminal trial due to his autism and attention deficit disorders, doctors wrote in a recent amicus brief.
Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial could have been hurt because of his neurodivergence disorders, leading to “longwinded answers” that frustrated the court, says a group of doctors in an amicus brief supporting his appeal.
The FTX co-founder is diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that “posed serious challenges during proceedings in this case,” eight doctors focused on the field of neurodivergence told the Second Circuit Appeals Court in a Sept. 20 amicus brief supporting Bankman-Fried.
They claimed several rulings were detrimental to Bankman-Fried “because of his neurodivergence,” in particular the Manhattan district court’s ruling that government prosecutors could cross-examine him without a jury before he sat before jurors.
Go to Source
Author: Jesse Coghlan
