1. Home
  2. Binance SEC

Binance SEC

Binance and CEO Chanpgeng Zhao asks court to dismiss SEC suit

Binance Holdings and its CEO Changpeng Zhao have filed a petition seeking to have the lawsuit made against them by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dismissed.

Binance CEO Changpeng "CZ" Zhao have filed a petition requesting that the lawsuit made against him and his cryptocurrency exchange by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) be dismissed. 

According to a Sept. 21 filing to the United States District Court, both Binance Holdings and Zhao claimed that the financial regulatory had overstepped its authority in the lawsuit against them. 

“In attempting to claim regulatory power over the crypto industry, the SEC distorts the text of the securities laws,” lawyers for Binance wrote in the 60-page petition.

In addition to Binance and Zhao's petition, the American outfit of the crypto exchange, Binance.US also moved to have the charges made against it dismissed in a seperate 56-page filing made on the same day.  

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

SEC sees temporary setback in request to access Binance.US software

A federal magistrate judge has denied the SEC's request to gain immediate access to Binance.US's software, asking the regulator to provide more specific requests for discovery.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has failed to win immediate access to Binance.US's software in a Sept. 18 hearing, with the judge saying he isn't “inclined to allow the inspection at this time.”

The hearing was held to discuss SEC’s motion to compel Binance to hand over detailed information and make its executives more available for depositions, which has been a point of contention between the two over the past week. 

In a hearing, Judge Faruqui said that he wasn’t “inclined to allow the inspection at this time.” Alternatively, he proposed that the SEC should come up with more specific requests for discovery and speak with a broader range of witnesses, according to a Sept. 18 Bloomberg report.

The SEC has repeatedly claimed that it has been struggling to get information from Binance.US since it sued the American arm of the crypto exchange, along with its international affiliate Binance Holdings Ltd and CEO Changpeng "CZ" Zhao on June 5 for its alleged involvement in the sale of unregistered securities.

On Sept. 15, the SEC accused Binance.US of noncooperation in the investigation, with the regulator highlighting that Binance.US's holding company BAM Trading had produced only 220 documents during the discovery process.

A large portion of these documents “consist of unintelligible screenshots and documents without dates or signatures,” the SEC said. The regulator added that BAM has refused to produce essential witnesses for deposition, instead agreeing only to four depositions of witnesses it had deemed appropriate. 

However, Binance has previously characterized the SEC's repeated requests for discovery as “unduly burdensome," while the SEC claimed that Binance is being uncooperative despite agreeing to a consent order on discovery in the SEC’s case against it for unregistered securities operations and other allegations.

Related: SEC claims Ceffu wallet provider is ‘Binance-related’ in motion against BAM

Judge Faruqui's decision to deny the SEC immediate access to Binance.US's software and other documentation is a partial setback for the regulator in its ongoing case against the exchange. 

The custody of Binance.US customer assets is one of the central concerns that the SEC has with the crypto exchange — with the regulator claiming that Binance.US must be investigated more thoroughly to tease out potential links to the global arm of the exchange. 

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market — Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

SEC and Binance.US to negotiate deal avoiding total asset freeze

United States District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the two entities to work toward a compromise.

Binance.US and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission have agreed to work on an arrangement that will allow the exchange to avoid freezing all of its assets.

On June 14, Bloomberg reported that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson referred the two organizations to a magistrate judge to work toward a compromise arrangement to protect customer funds without having to shut down the exchange.

“Shutting it down completely would create significant consequences not only for the company but for the digital asset markets in general,” Jackson said at a June 13 hearing.

Judge Jackson noted she wouldn’t come to a final decision on the SEC’s motion for a temporary restraining order until the two parties had worked through the situation with the magistrate.

An update on the negotiations made with the magistrate has been scheduled for the end of business hours on June 15.

Additionally, she noted the SEC and Binance.US seemed “not that far apart” when it came to reaching an agreement on the matter.

Before Judge Jackson reached her decision at the hearing, former SEC enforcement attorney John Read Stark informed his 20,000 Twitter followers that there is “a lot of conflict between what each party” wanted to get out of the hearing.

“That does not mean the judge cannot order a compromise and find common ground,” Stark explained.

Related: SEC can’t find Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, asks court for ‘alternative service’

The SEC filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on Binance.US on June 6, after accusing Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao of being able to access Binance.US customer funds.

The regulator alleged Zhao moved $12 billion of Binance’s funds through an entity he controlled called Merit Peak.

In a June 12 joint memorandum submitted ahead of the hearing on the restraining order, both Binance.US and Zhao denied the claims that funds were ever mishandled. They accused the SEC of being “unable to identify a single instance” in which Binance.US customer funds were ever misused.

“Indeed, there is no ‘emergency’ here at all, other than the one manufactured by the SEC for its own purposes.”

Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

‘All of the SEC’s claims fail’ — Binance.US rebuts motion to freeze funds

Binance.US has lodged its defense ahead of the June 13 hearing on whether its funds will be frozen.

Binance.US has asked the court to deny the securities regulator’s proposed temporary restraining order against its assets, claiming that the move would “effectively end” its business.

In a June 12 filing, Binance.US slammed the Securities and Exchange Commission's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on its business, calling it “draconian and unduly burdensome.”

The hearing on the temporary restraining order is scheduled for June 13 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Binance.US argued that the restraining order would force the closure of BAM Trading Services Inc., the entity that provides crypto trading and exchange services for Binance.US, stating:

“The requested relief would primarily harm BAM’s customers, effectively put BAM out of business, and prevent BAM from defending itself in this litigation.”

Notably, Binance.US took aim at the regulator’s entire approach to pursuing legal action against it, asserting that “all of the SEC’s claims fail” because the regulator has not yet “identified a single security trading on BAM’s platform.” At the time of publication, the SEC has alleged that at least 68 cryptocurrencies are securities.

"The SEC suggests that it is a foregone conclusion that cryptocurrency is a security, but that is not the case. That numerous cryptocurrency exchanges, including BAM, have operated in the United States for years without interference by the SEC belies the claim that they are clearly covered by the securities laws," wrote the filing.

Furthermore, Binance.US said that it had made “significant efforts” to cooperate with an ongoing SEC investigation that began on Dec. 20, 2020. According to the filing, the results of this investigation have yielded more than 700,000 individual communications and “bespoke data” on its day-to-day operations.

The SEC first launched major legal action against Binance and its affiliates on June 5, accusing the crypto exchange and failing to register as a securities exchange and for allowing U.S. customers to trade cryptocurrencies it claims are securities.

Additionally, the regulator accused Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) of being able to access Binance.US customer funds and alleged that he moved $12 billion in Binance’s funds through a privately-controlled entity called Merit Peak.

The next day on June 6, the SEC filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order against Binance, requesting that assets held on Binance.US be frozen until the crypto exchange could prove that the funds were not able to be moved by CZ or any other executive at Binance.

Related: Binance CEO CZ responds as data points to billions in exchange outflows

While both Binance and Binance.US have repeatedly denied the SEC’s claims on social media over the course of the last week, a joint memorandum submitted alongside the filing marked the first official comment made regarding the accusations.

It argued that the SEC is unable to “identify a single instance in which BAM customer assets were mishandled or misused.”

“Indeed, there is no ‘emergency’ here at all, other than the one manufactured by the SEC for its own purposes,” the memorandum added.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

Crypto sentiment index dips back to March ‘fear’ levels amid Binance lawsuit

Total liquidations have topped $280 million in 12 hours on June 5 as crypto market sentiment has turned more fearful.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index — a tool that measures broader market sentiment towards Bitcoin and the broader crypto market — has dipped to a level of “fear” not witnessed since March 11 this year, when Circle’s USD coin (USDC) briefly lost its dollar-peg

The stumble in market sentiment on June 5 comes in the wake of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filing a lawsuit against Binance, its U.S. arm of operations and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao.

The SEC pressed a total of 13 charges against the exchange and its affiliates for failing to register as a securities exchange and operating illegally in the United States.

The Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index. Source: Alternative.me.

The index works by aggregating a mixture of indicators to gauge market sentiment. It combines metrics, including price volatility, momentum, trading volume, with data from social media and Google trends to form an overall picture of investor’s emotions toward Bitcoin and the wider crypto market.

Much of the negative sentiment owes to the immediate plunge in the value of cryptocurrencies following the SEC’s latest move against Binance. Blue-chip crypto assets such as Bitcoin and Ether (ETH) are down 4.1% and 3.1%, respectively, in the last 24 hours, according to data from Cointelegraph Price Index.

The larger altcoins also took a beating. At the time of publication, Cardano (ADA) was down 6.4% in the past24 hours, while Solana (SOL) had fallen 7.4%.

Related: SEC complaint hints at why Brian Brooks resigned as Binance.US CEO

Traders with open positions on crypto derivatives markets also suffered consequences, with more than $280 million worth of liquidations occurring since the announcement of the lawsuit.

Total liquidations in the past 12 hours. Source: Coinglass.

Unsurprisingly, traders with open “long” positions — a leveraged bet on the price of crypto assets increasing — were the hardest hit, accounting for $261.75 million (92%) of the overall liquidations. Meanwhile, short traders experienced $20.7 million in liquidations. The top two digital assets were responsible for around 43% of these losses.

Asia Express: Yuan stablecoin team arrested, WeChat’s new Bitcoin prices, HK crypto rules

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

SEC complaint hints at why Brian Brooks resigned as Binance.US CEO

New details revealed in the SEC complaint could explain why Brian Brooks abruptly stepped down as CEO of Binance.US in 2021, a crypto lawyer suggests.

The SEC’s latest complaint against Binance could point to why former Binance.US CEO Brian Brooks chose to step down in August 2021, only three months after his appointment.

According to a June 5 tweet from cryptocurrency lawyer James Murphy — known on Twitter as MetaLawMan — the SEC complaint cites an “unnamed source” who ran Binance.US for a brief period of time in 2021. The dates correlate with the time that Brooks was CEO of Binance.US.

Brooks, a former top banking regulator, led operations at the crypto exchange after replacing former CEO Catherine Coley on May 1, 2021. According to comments cited in the complaint, Brooks quickly realized that he was “not actually the one running this company.” Upon recognizing this, he decided to leave and announced his resignation just three months later on Aug. 7.

Binance’s Chief Communications Officer Patrick Hillman, has however pushed back on Murphy’s speculation, adding that this “might be one person's narrative” and that it “might not hold up to the test of time.”

Cointelegraph reached out to Binance.US and Brian Brooks for comment but has yet to receive a response.

The information comes in the wake of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pressing a total of 13 charges against Binance for allegedly failing to register as a securities exchange and operating illegally in the U.S.

The news wreaked havoc on the price of cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), which are down 5.6% and 4.3% respectively in the last 24 hours, according to data from Cointelegraph Price Index.

Shares of publicly-traded crypto companies in the U.S. also witnessed a sharp decline in price, with Coinbase (COIN) plunging 9% during market trading hours on June 5.

Coinbase next?

Mark Palmer, the senior equity research analyst at Berenberg Capital told Cointelegraph that several of the details revealed in the lawsuit “echo” those it previously filed against similarly U.S.-based crypto exchanges Bittrex and Kraken.

Related: SEC’s Binance suit contains heavy mix of predictable charges, novel revelations

As such, Palmer believes that “these cases in aggregate represent a preview of the action that is likely to be filed against Coinbase.”

Palmer said that Coinbase investors should be focusing on whether the exchange has the ability to “successfully pivot” its business model and geographic focus if it were forced to “curtail or cease” a large portion of its operations in the U.S. as a result of SEC enforcement.

“We estimate that at least 37% of COIN's net revenue would be at risk if the SEC were to target the company's crypto token trading and staking operations.

Magazine: Bitcoin is on a collision course with ‘Net Zero’ promises

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi

Binance CEO Warns of ‘Profound Impacts’ on Crypto Industry if BUSD Is Ruled as a Security

Binance CEO Warns of ‘Profound Impacts’ on Crypto Industry if BUSD Is Ruled as a SecurityBinance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has warned of “profound impacts” on the crypto industry if stablecoin Binance USD (BUSD) is ruled as a security. His warning followed an alleged lawsuit by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Paxos, the issuer of Binance USD. Binance’s CEO on SEC Action Against Paxos and BUSD Following […]

Uniswap responds to SEC Wells notice: ‘We are ready to fight’ for DeFi