1. Home
  2. CeFi

CeFi

Crypto winter has 250 days left if the market cycle repeats: Grayscale

The crypto industry has endured some infamous bear markets, and the 2022 downturn will be remembered for its acid test of decentralized finance platforms and over-leveraged trading.

Grayscale Investment's latest Insight report provides interesting food for thought, pinning the start of the current bear market in June 2022,  which could last another 250 days if previous market cycles are to repeat themselves.

Grayscale notes that cryptocurrency markets mimic their conventional counterparts with cyclical movements. Bitcoin (BTC) market cycles conventionally last 4 years or approximately 1,275 days. The firm defines a cycle when the realized price of BTC moves below the current market price.

Realized price is determined by the sum of all assets at their purchase price divided by the asset's market capitalization. This gives a measure of how many positions are profitable, if at all. June 13 saw the realized price of BTC cross below market price, which Grayscale identifies as the start of the current bear market.

The firm believes this presents a prime investment opportunity - which is set to last another 250 days from July if the duration of previous cycles repeats itself.

Retracing history, Grayscale highlights the 2012-2015 market cycle with events like the rise and fall of the dark web marketplace Silk Road and the infamous Mt. Gox debacle, which led to the first major bear market. The development of Ethereum, major exchanges and wallet providers led to a gradual climb to the next highs in the market.

2016 to 2019 will be remembered for the boom in initial coin offerings, made possible by smart contract functionality introduced by Ethereum. Much of the capital that flowed into the cryptocurrency ecosystem in late 2017 exited the following year, as the second major bear market began.

The 2020 market cycle will be remembered as a story of leverage. Grayscale notes that investors were enticed to leverage trade with increased government spending during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Related: Terra contagion leads to 80%+ decline in DeFi protocols associated with UST

A positive funding rate lasted for six months, with many traders leveraging positions with cryptocurrency as collateral. When crypto prices dipped, traders were forced to sell, which triggered a cascade of liquidations, seeing BTC drop from a November 2021 peak of $64,800 to $29,000 in June 2021.

Again leverage hurt the markets a year later, but DeFi’s major centralized finance (CeFi) players faltered after attracting massive investment with attractive yields. The rest is history, as the collapse of the US Terra stablecoin (UST) engulfed the ecosystem. Over-leveraged traders and positions were liquidated across various CeFi platforms - which exacerbated market sell-offs and sunk major capital lending firms in the space like Celsius and Three Arrows Capital.

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

Celsius bankruptcy filings show a company in deep trouble

The bankrupt CeFi crypto lender is about $1.2 billion in deficit, with the majority of its liabilities being customer deposits some believe they may not be required to give back.

Celsius’ bankruptcy filing has revealed some unpleasant surprises about the state of the crypto lending platform, including a $1.2 billion deficit formed largely as a result of user deposits. 

A chapter 11 bankruptcy document signed off by Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky on July 14 has revealed that the company holds around $4.3 billion in assets against $5.5 billion in liabilities, representing a $1.2 billion deficit.

User deposits made up the majority of liabilities at $4.72 billion, while Celsius' assets include CEL tokens as assets valued at $600 million, mining assets worth $720 million, and $1.75 billion in crypto assets.  

The value of the CEL tokens has drawn suspicion from some in the crypto community however, as the entire market cap for CEL tokes is only $321 million, according to CoinGecko data.

The financial roundup for Celsius reveals a $1.2 billion deficit.

Among the crypto assets are 410,421 Lido Staked ETH (stETH) tokens worth about $479 million which are generating 5% APY, though the tokens themselves cannot be redeemed for Ether (ETH) until the Ethereum network transitions into Proof-of-Stake consensus in the Merge.

Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky signed a document stating that the company could also sell Bitcoin (BTC) mined by its Celsius Mining Bitcoin mining operation to “generate sufficient assets” to repay at least one of its loans and provide revenue for the company in the future. The company projects that it could generate about 15,000 BTC through 2023.

Swan Bitcoin founder Cory Klippstein has deplored both Celsius and Voyager’s recent decision to file for Chapter 11 protection rather than the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA).

In a July 14 tweet, Klippstein said filing under SIPA would have shifted ownership of the firm’s assets over to customers, which would have at least given them a portion of their deposits back.

Under Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, the company filing for protection claims ownership of all assets. Under SIPA, a failed firm must either transfer its accounts to another firm or be liquidated and send funds to investors.

Crypto skeptic economist and blogger Frances Coppola shared more potential bad news in a July 14 blog post by explaining why she believes Celsius depositors “won’t get their money back.”

She argues that Celsius is running what she calls a “shadow bank,” which is defined by Investopedia as a non-bank “unregulated financial intermediary.”

“Deposits in banks aren't even 'customer assets,' let alone 'assets under management.' They are unsecured loans to the bank. They are thus liabilities of the bank and fully at risk in bankruptcy.”

“Depositors in a bank do not have any legal right to return of their funds. Even if the terms of the account say funds can be withdrawn whenever the customer chooses, the bank can refuse to allow customers to withdraw their funds if it doesn't have the cash to pay them,” she explained.

Related: Voyager token skyrockets as VGX pump scheme touted

Coppola also added that Celsius’s terms of use make it clear that Celsius are allowed “to do with as it pleases” with funds deposited by customers.

“And it specifically says that in the event of bankruptcy, customers might not get all — or indeed any — of their money back.”

CEL has been falling since January, dropping 84% from $4.38 to $0.73, with a spike in June coinciding with a short squeeze attempt by the community.

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

DeFi Protocol Built on Ethereum Explodes 125% in Hours As Centralized Finance Firms Struggle

DeFi Protocol Built on Ethereum Explodes 125% in Hours As Centralized Finance Firms Struggle

One altcoin that powers an Ethereum-based decentralized finance (DeFi) platform is defying broader market woes by rallying in a big way. Rari Governance (RGT) is the governance token of Rari Capital, a DeFi suite that allows participants to borrow, lend and earn yields on cryptocurrencies. Holders of RGT can take part in the protocol’s governance […]

The post DeFi Protocol Built on Ethereum Explodes 125% in Hours As Centralized Finance Firms Struggle appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

Keys lost in the Vauld: Singapore crypto exchange freezes withdrawals

Not your keys, not your coins. Crypto CeFi lender Vauld has suspended "all withdrawals, trading and deposits."

Crypto contagion claims another casualty. In a statement, Singapore-based crypto exchange Vauld has made the “difficult decision to suspend all withdrawals, trading and deposits on the Vauld platform with immediate effect.”

In what appears to be a run on the crypto bank, the group intends to “apply to the Singapore courts for a moratorium,” as Vauld customers have tried to withdraw an “excess of a $197.7 million since 12 June 2022.”

The decision to suspend withdrawals is a screeching U-turn. Reportedly, Vauld boasted $1 billion assets under management in May this year, while on June 16, a company email stated that business would “continue to operate as usual.” Just 18 days later, the company is exploring “potential restructuring options.”

On June 21st, CEO, Darshan Bathija tweeted that Vauld had cut their team by 30%–the first sign that the company was under duress. Separately, Bathija also stressed that Three Arrows Capital (3AC) was an early investor in the company, but had exited in late 2021:

The statement from Vauld suggests that "volatile market conditions, the financial difficulties of our key business partners inevitably affecting us, and the current market climate," were reasons behind their decision to freeze customers' money.

Nonetheless, 3AC’ demise is cited and considered a significant contributor to capitulation among CeFi (Centralised Finance) companies. 3AC had substantial exposure to Terra (originally Luna, now LUNC) which blew up in spectacular fashion reducing 3AC’s holdings from $560 million to $670. 

Indeed, Vauld follows in the footsteps of large CeFi platforms such as Celsius, Voyager, and BlockFi. Voyager explicitly blamed 3AC for their recent decision to freeze customers’ funds; BlockFi is close to a $240 million deal with FTX following financial difficulties, while plans to salvage Celsius from bankruptcy were recently shared by lead investor BnkToTheFuture.

For crypto investigative journalist Otterooo, Vauld’s strife is more motivation for investors to hold their own keys. Holding onto one’s private keys is a “guiding principle” of crypto investing: if you do not hold your own keys, you do not own your coins.

As Cointelegraph reported in a March 2021 press release, Vauld boasted double-digit interest rates on popular stablecoins such as Tether (USDT) and DAI, while Bitcoin (BTC) interest could reach 7.23%. In effect, in “lending” your cryptocurrency tokens to Vauld, you would generate a yield; however, the company effectively owns your assets.

Vauld's interest rates from March 2021. Source: Vauld

The rates were competitive with lenders and interest bearers such as Celsius, BlockFi, and Nexo–one of which continues to function. Nexo tweeted that there may be delays to customer transactions due to Independence Day in the United States. 

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao Makes 10-Year Prediction for Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao Makes 10-Year Prediction for Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

The chief executive of the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume predicts that decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized exchange platforms (DEXes) will outshine their centralized counterparts in the long term. In a new interview on the Bankless YouTube channel, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao predicts that in 10 years, decentralized blockchain projects will tower above […]

The post Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao Makes 10-Year Prediction for Decentralized Finance (DeFi) appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

USDD Continues to Trade for Under $1 — Tron DAO Reserve Insists Stablecoin Has Not Depegged

USDD Continues to Trade for Under  —  Tron DAO Reserve Insists Stablecoin Has Not DepeggedSince June 12, 2022, the Tron-based stablecoin USDD has remained below a U.S. dollar in value. On Monday, USDD had a 24-hour trading range of around $0.943 to $0.966 per unit and the day prior on June 19, USDD saw an all-time low at $0.928 per unit. Despite being below the U.S. dollar parity, the […]

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

Nexo offers to buy out Celsius’ loans amid withdrawal suspension

Nexo platform could rescue Celsius' customers after “what appears to be the insolvency of the Celsius Network.”

There’s a glimmer of hope for the bear market’s most recent victim. Following reports that Celsius is insolvent, Nexo is offering a buy-out.

A Nexo representative told Cointelegraph that Nexo is trying to do the “right thing” as they are “mindful of the repercussions for retail investors & the crypto community.”

Celsius suspended all network withdrawals on Monday; users are not able to access their funds. In an open letter, Nexo has extended a formal offer to acquire qualifying assets of Celsius Network after their withdrawal freeze. The letter states:

“Nexo, its partners, and affiliates could readily acquire from Celsius part or all qualifying, outstanding collateralized loan receivables secured by their corresponding pledged cryptocurrency collateral, subject to Nexo’s risk management and collateral requirements.”

In a nutshell, the Nexo team would absorb all of Celsius’ loans and gain its customer database. The Nexo team has allowed seven days for the Celsius team to respond, as the proposal will terminate on June 20.

In a tumultuous weekend of market action, Nexo’s first call to help was rejected by the Celsius team on June 12:

“Yesterday [June 12] we reached out to the Celsius team to offer our support, but our help was refused.”

Separately, Nexo has reassured investors that funds are safe. The Nexo representative told Cointelegraph it was “the first crypto lender to publicly open its books to the public in real time back in September and invited all our competitors and responsible crypto platforms to follow our lead.”

Competitors including Ledn, a Bitcoin-only (BTC) credit and savings product platform have released similar statements to spread calm among investors.  In a tweet, Ledn shared that customers’ investments are secure. BlockFi CEO Zac Prince tweeted that his business is operating normally.  Ledn, Nexo and Blockfi have been open to talking about their business models with Cointelegraph previously.

Related: Mashinsky says ‘Sharks of Wall Street’ circling around Celsius and other projects

Nexo is not the only company to come to the aid of Celsius. Bitcoin maximalist Cory Klippsten, founder of Bitcoin-only exchange Swan Bitcoin (who had previously called out Celsius as risky) has offered a “life raft” to Celsius investors. 

For some commentators, such as analyst Will Clemente, comparisons between Luna’s implosion and Celsius’ apparent insolvency are too hard to ignore:

As Klippsten and Nexo have made clear, the crypto community is attempting to limit the immediate fallout of Celsius' reported insolvency. The Nexo spokesperson said "[Nexo] hopes Celsius will accept this help and as few investors will be affected adversely as possible."

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

CeFi interest on the wane: Will BlockFi, Ledn and Nexo rates trend lower?

Cointelegraph spoke to CeFi leaders to understand where interest rates are going and what the future holds for CeFi.

Generating a yield on crypto is increasingly tricky. The Terra ecosystem implosion — where up to $50 billion was wiped out — led to a decline in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols offering interest.

At the other end of the table, centralized finance, or CeFi, where all processes are rooted through a central body, has endured a comparatively peaceful bear market, yet interest rates are trending down.

On the first of the month, investors who have an account with a CeFi provider such as Ledn, Celsius, BlockFi or Nexo generally receive emails detailing the interest rate for the following month.

A blow for those looking for passive income, the interest paid from CeFi providers has ground down since the 2021 bull market. Giving up custody of a crypto asset for a miserly interest payment has encouraged some crypto enthusiasts to take control of their private keys, even drawing comparisons to legacy banking.

In the table below, three of the largest custodians of Bitcoin (BTC) and crypto assets have fallen, taking into account both the interest rate and the amount of interest paid on each asset.

CeFi interest rates have all but trended down over the past year. Source: Data was taken from each individual provider’s site.

Cointelegraph spoke to three of the largest lenders of Bitcoin and other crypto assets to understand whether interest rates from CeFi providers may eventually hit rock bottom, aka 0.01% interest — like at banks — and why these lenders and interest providers exist. 

Interest rates will continue to be attractive

Representatives from Ledn, Nexo and BlockFi agreed that while interest in crypto is lower, it outcompetes legacy lending. Mauricio Di Bartolomeo, co-founder of Canada-based Ledn, told Cointelegraph, ”We are still five to 10 years away from Bitcoin rates coming anywhere close to those of fiat bank accounts.”

“Most legacy bank savings accounts are paying out mere basis points (between 0.01% and 0.05%). Interest rates for our Bitcoin Savings Account product are still 5.25% APY for the first 0.1 BTC and 2% APY for balances above 0.1 BTC as of today.”

In a tweet thread, Di Bartolomeo shared that “changing market conditions” have obliged lenders to drop their rates, as the difficulty level of turning a profit on arbitrage opportunities and the futures basis trade has risen.

Jonathan Haspel, senior institutional trading associate at BlockFi, agreed, stating that “yield related to crypto interest-bearing accounts is impacted by a number of factors, including market sentiment, funding rates, supply and demand, and balance sheet optimization.”

It’s true that crypto market sentiment has plummeted since the March 2020 crash, while funding rates, particularly for altcoins, have dropped to “worrying levels.” Haspel explained:

“Ultimately, compressed rates and volatility are a sign of the asset class’s maturation. Where yield was once rampant and liquidity once sparse, there are more players in the crypto game feeding its competitive financing and widespread access.”

Bullish on CeFi: The future remains bright

Zac Prince, CEO of BlockFi, told Cointelegraph that he’s still “bulllish on [...] clients’ desire to earn crypto interest back for the long term.”

In a similar note of optimism, Nexo co-founder and executive chairman Kosta Kantchev told Cointelegraph, “‘The times, they are a-changing,’ but crypto yields are still multiple times higher than those of traditional banks.” In a nod to the price of Bitcoin flatlining at around the $30,000 mark, Kantchev said:

“While interest on some assets has become more stable, this mirrors the assets themselves. I think people largely overlook the sky-high rates on some of the newer assets on the block.”

Ultimately, and in agreement with Di Bartolomeo, “regardless of how historically volatile crypto has been, the opportunity is always there.” CeFi providers will continue to offer more attractive interest rates than legacy financial institutions.

It’s important to note that Nexo operates a different model, which would explain why rates are not technically dropping (as shown in the above table). Users experience higher rates of interest if they lock up the asset or hold a proportion of the Nexo token. Contrary to the other CeFi lenders, Kantchev explained:

“Rates are not dropping. It’s more that yields on older cryptos on Nexo are ensured to be sustainable in the long run, but the eyebrow-raising rates are often available either with Nexo Tokens through our loyalty program or for some of the newer coins for which we can generate such impressive yield.”

Growing adoption and innovation, anticipating regulation

That dropping rates should not be cause for concern: Per Di Bartolomeo, not only are centralized entities “instrumental to the adoption and evolution of Bitcoin as pristine collateral,” but legacy banks may even look to “partner” with CeFi players in the future. He said:

“This means that centralized lenders, like Ledn, will act as a conduit to bring legacy capital to Bitcoin — benefiting both Bitcoiners (by letting them borrow at increasingly better rates) and capital providers (by offering them a great risk-adjusted return).”

Related: Can DeFi and CeFi coexist? Three takeaways from experts panel

BlockFi’s Haspel agreed, “CeFi offers a compelling use case supporting crypto’s narrative for global monetary access.” Despite the turbulent waters the crypto industry treads in spring 2022, BlockFi sees “an increase in global demand for risk-managed crypto products — such as interest accounts — in other emerging digital assets.”

“While credit checks and a lack of financial history harm individuals seeking access to capital on a global scale, CeFi lending offers a solution. By utilizing crypto assets confirmed on a transparent and immutable ledger, CeFi protocols are able to quickly verify their possession.”

For Kantchev, innovation, customers and new products are right around the corner: “Compliant, sustainable interest products that address regulatory guidance while profitably paying customers will be one of the next such products.”

“The industry has matured tremendously, [...] so I’m convinced we will continue to find risk-free strategies that yield attractive returns and be able to share these with the community.”

In Nexo’s case, that means diversifying its product offering; for BlockFi, it continues to onboard institutions, while Ledn has branched out into Bitcoin-backed mortgages.

Cointelegraph reached out to CeFi provider Celsius for comment but did not receive a response as of publishing time. 

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why

The integration of CeFi and DeFi through Binance Bridge 2.0

Read this guide to learn how to bridge assets from any blockchain to BNB Chain using Binance Bridge 2.0.

Integration of CeFi and DeFi through Binance Bridge 2.0

DeFi is driving the development of cutting-edge Web3 use cases such as nonfungible tokens (NFTs), gaming and the metaverse. With the Binance Bridge 2.0, DeFi can be brought to a broader audience worldwide while maintaining the same smooth user experience as CeFi.

Most of the “DeFi” ecosystem relies on centralized services because of convenience, which enables us to understand where the traditional world of centralized banking and the new world of decentralized money might intersect to everyone's benefit.

Binance, with its first bridge, made it possible to bridge assets listed on Binance.com to other blockchains. To integrate CeFi and DeFi, the Binance Bridge 2.0 comes to the rescue by allowing you to wrap ERC20 tokens to BEP20 BTokens and start staking your Ethereum or other supported assets with DeFi protocols running on the BNB Smart Chain right away. 

Binance also implemented a whole new automatic token circulation control system. Except for a buffer size in hot wallets, the exchange will not keep a surplus of pegged tokens known as wrapped assets. Instead, when users withdraw pegged tokens onto the BNB Smart Chain, it will print more tokens.

The Binance Bridge 2.0 is a trusted bridge that operates on the BNB Smart Chain with transaction fees as low as a few cents and transaction speeds as fast as three seconds. It is safeguarded by Binance's highest security standards and operates on the BNB Smart Chain. 

Nearly all Ethereum-based coins will be supported via the Binance Bridge 2.0, allowing direct access to BNB Smart Chain DApps. This cross-chain bridge improves interoperability between several blockchains and gives you direct access to the DeFi world of the BNB Smart Chain.

Related: What are DApps? A beginner's guide to decentralized applications

How does Binance Bridge 2.0 work?

BTokens are tied to the underlying asset at a 1:1 ratio, and you can redeem your BTokens to the original asset whenever you desire.

As BTokens will be pegged at a 1:1 ratio to the underlying assets, they can be exchanged for the original cryptos. Bridged tokens that aren't displayed on the platform will only be transferred to the funding wallet. Likewise, the platform's bridged tokens would be moved to the funding or spot wallet. According to Binance, the most significant change is that you will be able to accomplish all of this straight from your Binance account rather than having to create a third-party wallet. 

The listed tokens will go straight into your funding or spot wallet while the unlisted bridged tokens will be stored in a separate self-custody wallet (SCW) within the Binance App. A self-custody wallet lets users store digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. To transact with blockchain-based financial applications like the Compound Liquidity Pool, SCWs, also known as non-custodial wallets, are necessary.

The cross-chain bridge will promote interoperability between multiple blockchains and allow users to immediately access the Defi on the BNB Chain, as stated by the platform. This advancement is projected to raise demand for the Binance platform, eventually reflected in its higher valuation.

Why is cross-chain technology important?

A cross-chain technology aims to allow value and information to be transferred between multiple blockchain networks. It's becoming a major issue of debate, as it's considered the final option for improving blockchain interoperability.

People have mostly been unable to reap the full benefits of distributed ledger technology because the chains operate in isolation. As a result, people have been unable to fully benefit from blockchain technology because of the incapacity of multiple blockchains to communicate. 

Cross-chain technology aims to address these concerns by providing interoperability between blockchains, allowing them to communicate and share information more easily. Ripple (XRP) is a good example of a blockchain project exploring cross-chain transactions. Ripple has already been assisting banks worldwide in settling cross-border payments in various fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies.

Other significant blockchain interoperability projects include the Polkadot (DOT) blockchain. It ensures a seamless connection between public networks, private chains, permission-less interfaces and oracles

In addition, the developers behind the blockchain interoperability solutions want to enable an internet where independent blockchain solutions will be able to exchange information via a Polkadot relay chain.

What is Binance Bridge 2.0?

Binance Bridge 2.0 is a new bridge service that gives all popular blockchain networks access to inter-blockchain liquidity.

Binance launches Binance Bridge 2.0 to connect Ethereum-based tokens (both listed and unlisted) as BTokens to the BNB Chain. You can use your wrapped BTokens to explore the metaverse, blockchain-based games, decentralized finance (Defi) and more in the BNB Chain ecosystem, reducing the need for swaps and overcoming other interoperability barriers that have plagued blockchain.

Therefore, Binance users will be able to use the bridge as a one-stop shop for all centralized finance (Cefi) and DeFi. The intent behind the first version of the Binance Bridge was to make multiple blockchains more interoperable. In addition, it allowed anyone to exchange their crypto assets into Binance Chain (now BNB Chain) and Binance Smart Chain (now BNB Smart Chain) wrapped tokens (and vice versa).

The technique for swapping tokens (supported only on Binance.com) contains two categories in the first version: Peg-In and Peg-Out. Using Peg-In, users can swap native tokens for pegged tokens on the BNB Chain or BNB Smart Chain. Meanwhile, the Peg-Out technique allows users to convert pegged tokens to native tokens on the BNB Chain or the BNB Smart Chain.

Regular deposit and withdrawal functionalities in the Binance Bridge version 2.0 allow users to bridge tokens between their original blockchains and the BNB Chain. In the future, Binance also wants to improve its mobile app to enable users to perform similar conversions with a single click.

This article aims to discuss the integration of CeFi and DeFi through Binance Bridge 2.0 and how the Binance Bridge works.

Coinbase Research Says ‘Surprise to the Upside’ Possible for Ethereum ETF Decision – Here’s Why