data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ac14/5ac145c3c1c5d060c5b99fd1afb80e3c70b53fb4" alt="The Top Privacy Coins Saw Fewer Percentage Losses Than Most Tokens This Week The Top Privacy Coins Saw Fewer Percentage Losses Than Most Tokens This Week"
The chief of NCA claimed that coin mixing services offer a layer of anonymity and protection to criminals looking to launder and wash their “dirty” funds.
The United Kingdom's National Crime Agency (NCA) seeks to regulate the crypto coin mixers under the country's laws against money laundering.
Coin mixing tools are popular in the decentralized world as they maintain the privacy of transactions. These tools often mix several transactions to obscure the origin of a particular transaction. Then the recipient receives the transactions from a mixing "black box" comprised of hundreds of transactions from various wallets. While privacy-focused, these tools often face regulators' ire as they are also a known way for hackers and criminals to wash their funds.
Gary Cathcart, the NCA's head of financial investigation, claimed that these transaction mixing tools offer a layer of anonymity to criminals that can be used for "churning criminal cash, obscuring its origins and audit trail."
Cathcart called upon regulators to bring these open-source mixing tools under money laundering regulations. This would ensure such service providers carry out mandatory Anti-Money Laundering checks and audit transactions passing through their platforms, reported the Financial Times.
NCA didn't respond to Cointelegraph's request for comments at the time of publishing.
Another hurdle for regulators is the open-source and decentralized nature of such services, where thtracking and auditing of funds could become a complex task. This issue was highlighted during the Candian Freedom trucker movement, where non-custodial wallet service provider Nunchuck explained that they hold no info on their users, which is by the design of the decentralized tech.
Related: New PlusToken Report Shows KYC May Be Smoke and Mirrors
The crypto services providers have been relatively compliant with regulations around the globe and have made amendments to their services to keep up with regulators. In this case, some are even a step ahead. Wasabi, a popular privacy-focused wallet that offered crypto mixer services via CoinJoin, announced on Monday that they would be blocking transactions with illicit ties.
It is also important to note that despite obscuring the source of the transactions, these transactions can be eventually traced back to the source account with several powerful analytic tools as was the case in Binance’s $40 million hack.
Even though the perpetrators behind the hack used a chip mixer to launder the stolen funds, the increased activity in the mixing tool gave away their identity and later the majority of the funds were traced.
The founder of the Wasabi Wallet called the decision a major setback for Bitcoin’s fungibility, while one of the developers advocated for the use of other privacy coordinators over zkSNACKs.
CoinJoin, a popular Bitcoin (BTC) mixing tool, will block transactions associated or flagged as illegal. The announcement came from the official Wasabi Wallet Twitter account, which Coinjoin is a part of.
The zkSNACKs coordinator will start refusing certain UTXOs from registering to coinjoins. pic.twitter.com/X3kBuQwieO
— Wasabi Wallet (@wasabiwallet) March 13, 2022
The official announcement noted that CoinJoin services would start blocking certain unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs) from registering with the CoinJoin with the help of the zkSNACKs coordinator. A zkSNACKs coordinator is a virtual machine used to mix the origin of the transitions.
Privacy-focused mixing tools are primarily used to obscure the origin of the transactions and are often seen as a medium to wash illicit funds. However, blockchain being a public ledger as well as, with several forensic tools developed by the likes of Chainalysis, money laundering via mixing tools has become quite difficult over the past few years.
The latest announcement from the firm had riled up many privacy advocates who accused the privacy-focused wallet of bowing down to law enforcement. However, a Wasabi developer who goes by the Twitter name of Rafe explained that they haven’t compromised on their core values, but have to adhere to certain benchmarks.
No one has infiltrated Wasabi, since we wouldn't be having this conversation if that were the case.
— Rafe ⚡ (@BTCparadigm) March 14, 2022
There's no need to spy when banning inputs.
Many would be happy to sink with the ship when needed. Is it better to have no zkSNACKs coordinator or to keep it running for majority?
Related: What are Bitcoin mixers, and why do exchanges ban them?
Rafe also pointed out that the blocking of UTXOs is limited to the ZkSNACKs coordinator and people using any other coordinator can still feel private and secure. Adam Fiscor, the founder of Wasabi wallet however acknowledged that blacklisting has come to the privacy wallet and believes it could prove to be a threat to Bitcoin’s fungibility.
Blacklisting arrived to coinjoins. IMO it is a major setback to Bitcoin's fungibility.
— nopara73 (@nopara73) March 14, 2022
Most governments and centralized entities have perpetuated a narrative around the use of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities and the role of privacy wallets and mixing tools in aiding them. However, research and data analytics have shown from time to time that using crypto for illicit activities comprises a very small fraction of the total transaction activity and it has been on a constant decline with the emergence of more powerful analytical tools.
According to data from Chainalysis, the illicit share of all crypto transactions volume has declined to 0.15% in 2021.
The recent arrest of the husband-wife duo found to be trying to launder money from Bitfinex multi-billion dollar hack is another prominent example, where the hackers were not just caught while trying to launder the stolen funds, the authorities managed to recover the majority of the hacked BTC as well.
Bitcoin transactions are easy to trace, except when the sender uses a mixer to muddle the link between their crypto address and real-life identity.
One of the original allures of cryptocurrency is the narrative that using them provides the sender or recipient anonymously, but this is a common misconception within the sector.
In reality, Bitcoin (BTC) and many other cryptocurrencies are easily traceable.
Proof of this came earlier this week when on April 27, U.S. authorities arrested the mastermind of Bitcoin Fog, a darknet-based BTC mixing service. Authorities were able to capture the operator after analyzing ten years of blockchain data.
One doesn't need to be a forensic analyst to know that every single transaction is tied up to addresses on the blockchain and that they will stay there forever. While government agencies cannot determine the IP address or personal data from the address, these coins usually end up being used for products or service payments. This is the trail that leads back to the sender and recipient.
In the case of Bitcoin Fog, law enforcement was able to identify server hosting expenses paid using digital currency. Bitcoin mixing services such as Bitcoin Fog allow users to mix their coins with other users, making it almost impossible to detect the destination addresses. This obfuscates the ties between the inputs and output addresses, providing a better level of privacy.
Mixing services are offered in a wide range of methods, including fully centralized solutions where trust is required, to Coinjoin mixers, which depend on a large group of users to self cooperate and act simultaneously. There's even the possibility of trading on decentralized exchanges (DEX) to virtually eliminate any possible tracing.
Centralized mixers offer the obvious single point of failure problem. Even if one trusts that the entity is using multisig addresses, if the service is willing to share its data or has been breached, their users will lose their privacy.
CoinJoin solved this problem by combining the inputs of multiple users into a single transaction. The service will then take those coins, craft them into a transaction, and have each participant sign before broadcasting it to the network. These transactions are then merged into one, and each user gets the original quantity in return. However, no one can see the origin of those coins, not even the entity that merges the transaction.
Even though CoinJoin isn't exactly untraceable, it provides plausible deniability, as no one can point out which entity owns each output. The larger the number of participants, the higher the degree of deniability.
Some cryptocurrency users also require anonymity for sending tokens to their wallets, and Wasabi Wallet has long been used for its embedded CoinJoin functionalities.
While its infrastructure is technically centralized, its design assures that the operators cannot deanonymize users or steal any funds. At the moment, the Wasabi wallet is only available for desktop solutions, so as is the case with anything in cryptocurrency, beware of clones!
A similar service is provided by Samourai wallet, which also offers a Chaumian CoinJoin mixing service, called Whirlpool. To achieve a full-privacy solution, users have to connect the Samourai wallet to their own full Bitcoin node. However, it does offer desktop and mobile versions.
Even though these mixing services aren't illegal in most jurisdictions, some exchanges and services might refuse users linked to addresses associated with coin mixing activities.
As more people realize the importance of achieving a certain degree of privacy for self-protection, the fewer incentives companies will have to deny their clients to use mixers.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.