1. Home
  2. Energy Consumption

Energy Consumption

Environmental groups want Bitcoin to follow Ethereum’s example in moving to proof-of-stake

Critics have suggested Bitcoin could not operate as the same decentralized currency without a consensus mechanism like proof-of-work.

Transitioning the Ethereum blockchain from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake has reduced its energy usage by more than 99% — and many climate activists have called for Bitcoin to follow suit. 

In a Thursday notice following the Merge, the United States-based Environmental Working Group, or EWG, announced it would be starting a $1-million campaign aimed at urging Bitcoin (BTC) to go green as opposed to using an “outdated protocol” like PoW. The announcement came amid environmental activity group Greenpeace launching a petition directly at Fidelity Investments to facilitate the transition to PoS.

“Other cryptocurrency protocols have operated on efficient consensus mechanisms for years,” said Michael Brune, director of the EWG campaign. “Bitcoin has become the outlier, defiantly refusing to accept its climate responsibility.”

Speaking to Cointelegraph, EWG senior vice president of government affairs Scott Faber suggested the Merge event was generally “good for the climate” in reducing the energy requirements for the Ethereum blockchain. He cited a September report from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy that concluded that cryptocurrencies — specifically noting PoW staking — significantly contributed to energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions, using more power in the United States than that for home computers.

“The Merge proves that changing the code is possible,” said Faber. “The Merge proves that digital assets that rely on proof-of-work can change to proof-of-stake and use far less electricity [...] We’re hopeful that the Bitcoin community will follow Ethereum’s lead.”

Faber added that he would support any efforts by the White House to set energy standards affecting crypto miners, saying regulators “should not stand by and hope for the best” but needed to take action “quickly” given the climate crisis:

“We’re agnostic. We support cryptocurrency. We’re not opposed to digital assets, but we are concerned about the rising electricity use associated with assets that rely on proof-of-work, and the climate pollution that is inevitably the result of more and more electricity use.”

Some industry leaders have pushed back against moving the Bitcoin blockchain to PoS, citing reasons like security, the impact on the network’s decentralization and how coins would be treated by U.S. regulators. In a Wednesday blog post, MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor claimed PoW was the “only proven technique for creating a digital commodity” like Bitcoin and suggested the total global energy usage of the cryptocurrency was a “rounding error” that was “neither the problem nor the solution” to solving the climate crisis.

“Regulators and legal experts have noted on many occasions that Proof-of-Stake networks are likely securities, not commodities, and we can expect them to be treated as such over time,” said Saylor. “PoS Crypto Securities may be appropriate for certain applications, but they are not suitable to serve as global, open, fair money or a global open settlement network. Therefore, it makes no sense to compare Proof of Stake networks to Bitcoin.”

Bitcoin mining platform Sazmining CEO William Szamosszegi told Cointelegraph in May:

“The fundamental mistake that [...] critics of Bitcoin’s energy consumption make is that they judge Bitcoin by its ‘ingredients,’ rather than its value proposition [...] We ought to judge a novel invention by the degree to which it solves a problem in society. PoW enables sound money and a decentralized currency backed by real-world energy. PoS can not possibly achieve this.”

Related: Environmental groups urge US government to take action on crypto miners

Many U.S. lawmakers have targeted major Bitcoin miners, with members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee requesting in August that mining firms provide information including the energy consumption of their facilities, energy sources and what percentage came from renewables. At the state level, New York has proposed imposing a two-year moratorium on PoW mining, legislation that would also prohibit the renewal of licenses to existing companies unless they were operating on 100% renewable energy.

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

Merge is ‘a step in the right direction’ to address crypto’s energy usage — Rostin Behnam

The CFTC chair said that the Ethereum blockchain’s transition to proof-of-stake, despite reducing energy usage by more than 99%, may not go far enough in resolving the problem.

Rostin Behnam, chair of the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, said the Ethereum blockchain’s transition to proof-of-stake may help reduce crypto’s energy usage, but hinted legislation would likely still be needed to address the problem.

Speaking at a Thursday hearing before the Senate Agriculture Committee, Behnam addressed a question from Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, who brought up the environmental impact of the “significant energy” required of mining cryptocurrencies. Without mentioning the Merge by name, the CFTC chair said the crypto bill currently being considered by lawmakers would require a report on energy usage that could lead to future policy discussion and “incentives to move away from carbon-intensive energy sources.”

“We’ve all heard the statistics about the amazing amount of energy used to mine coins,” said Behnam. “I would say that an event occurred last night with Ethereum which is going to reduce energy consumption — a step in the right direction, but certainly not resolving the problem.”

CFTC chair Rostin Behnam addressing the Senate Agriculture Committee on Thursday

In his written testimony, Behnam said he was in favor of passing the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act, legislation aimed at expanding the CFTC’s authority over the crypto market, adding the regulatory body had the “expertise and experience” to be the “regulator for the digital asset commodity market.” According to the CFTC chair, many of the criticisms around the crypto space — focusing on fraud and scams — could be addressed by giving the agency “a lens into the trading platform” rather than relying on users to bring enforcement cases.

“[The bill] would provide the authority to the CFTC to regulate markets. This volatility, the fraud, the manipulation — much of it would probably go away because we now have a regulator, a cop on the beat, and this would deter activity by bad actors.”

Related: Crypto bill needs clarification on 'digital commodity' — Sheila Warren

The Ethereum Merge took place on Thursday, marking the blockchain’s transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake and effectively cutting the network’s energy consumption by an estimated 99.95%. The price of Ether (ETH) fell under $1,500 in the hours following the event, with Cointelegraph reporting many crypto minted nonfungible tokens with a Merge theme.

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

Canaan exec says opportunity outweighs crisis as Bitcoin miners struggle with shrinking profits

This bear market is proving to be especially tough for Bitcoin miners, but Canaan senior vice president Edward Lu says the industry is “evolving toward a positive long term.”

2022 has been an exceptionally rough year for the crypto market, and the last few months of Bitcoin’s (BTC) price action could be a sign that bears aren’t even close to being ready to let up. Crumbling crypto prices also equate to diminishing profits for Bitcoin miners and this week’s regulatory action by the United States lawmakers requesting energy consumption data from four major BTC mining companies is bound to exert a bit more pressure on an already fragile situation.

Despite the increasingly bearish climate, most of the Bitcoin miners Cointelegraph has spoken to are incredibly optimistic about Bitcoin’s short and long-term price prospects.

Chiming in with similar sentiments, Canaan senior vice president Edward Lu spoke with Cointelegraph head of markets Ray Salmond about how industrial Bitcoin miners have matured and the new synergies they have created with the oil and gas and big energy sector in the United States and the Middle East.

Ray Salmond: Edward, what’s happening in the mining industry right now, from your point of view?

Edward Lu: Wow. This is a really big question. A lot of things are happening in this industry, especially in recent months. If you’re looking at Bitcoin dropping a little bit and coming back to stabilize in terms of days, it looks like the cycle is shorter than what we expect. I think by the end of the year, the price will be a bit better, going up a little bit. In the mining industry, you can see a lot of activities happening.

I remember that before last year, China and the U.S. market were the two major markets for mining, a mining’s generating hash rates, and then the Chinese miners moved out of the country to Kazakhstan in the first phase. And then starting from the beginning of this year, we see a lot of movements toward the U.S. market, and obviously, we see a lot of activities happening where you are in the state of Texas.

The availability of cheaper electricity, comparatively speaking, and also friendly policies and as well as engineers. There are decent, well-trained engineers in those industries. So really, a lot of things are happening in the mining industries.

RS: Electricity prices are soaring in the European Union and the United States, and at the same time, Bitcoin continues to trade near its 2018 all-time high. ASIC prices are also down roughly 70%, and it appears that for some miners, the cost of mining outweighs profitability. What are some of the capital expenditures (CAPEX) and operational expenses (OPEX) considerations that industrial miners have in this current climate?

EL: Well, yes. But if you look in the long term, the mining industry is a healthy and profitable business. Even if you look at these days in the short interim, sure, there is a small drop. The Bitcoin price and the energy price are increasing. But again, if you’re looking at CAPEX, OPEX or the profitability of the mining industry, there are many things combined together.

Of course, number one is your machine cost. Number two is your energy cost. Number three is your infrastructure cost. Number four is your OPEX for daily maintenance. But to the best of my knowledge, if you’re looking at today’s machine efficiency and today’s market, the average price of energy, and the average price of your OPEX, then Bitcoin price needs to not drop below $15,000 for miners to continue making a profit.

RS: The next Bitcoin halving is in about 590 days. What impact does this have on the efficiency of ASICs in the range of 110 TH/s to 140 TH/s? Can you speak about the reward for mining becoming smaller, yet the energy required to produce 1 BTC being higher? How could this dynamic change as production costs rise?

EL: The machines will keep improving. We’ll be more efficient when the technology develops. Of course, Bitcoin has been designed in a way that every four years, that reward is halved so that it becomes less and less — but it doesn’t mean that your profit will become less and less. If you look at the history, each halving happened every four years, and the business is still growing healthily. Mining industries keep growing. The profit depends, as I said earlier, on a lot of things. Of course, your machine costs, your infrastructure cost, your OPEX, CAPEX and also your energy costs. And of course, the last thing — which is pretty important — is the Bitcoin price. So, there are many things together. I don’t see this trend becoming smaller and smaller. I think this industry will still keep on going as well as we have gone through in the past. It’s a healthy, profitable business for mining industries.

RS: Is it incorrect to assume that with each having, ASICs must become more powerful and therefore use more power?

EL: No. It’s not right, to be honest. If you look at the machines and technology, even if it is going to have 100 TH/s, 120 TH/s or 140 TH/s, the consumption power versus the terahash — which is the efficiency we call per joule per TH/s — is becoming less and less.

If you’re looking at the history of previous machines, the efficiency is over 60 or 65 joules, and now it goes down today. If you look at the market, the average efficiency is about 30 joules. Then we see by the end of this year, every company, the three key players, are going to have machines or are already going to market that they have 25 joules and even below this figure. So, the machines are more efficient, and they consume less power versus TH/s.

RS: There’s growing synergy between traditional big energy and Bitcoin mining, such as capturing flared gas to power generators, solar mining and even hydroelectric-powered mining. Will industrial Bitcoin mining be the linchpin that actually catalyzes mass adoption of Bitcoin and brings it into everyone’s daily life?

EL: I started in this industry a few years ago, and when we started this industry, it was a lot of Chinese entrepreneurs who were mining. They were all individual entrepreneurs with passion who believed in this industry. I emphasize that an individual or passionate entrepreneur in China started that, and they looked for short-term interest. They looked for short-term money — you know, your typical Chinese individual entrepreneur.

But slowly, when I look at my partners, my Canaan partners, the profiles have been changing, or let’s say evolving, over the last three years. From the individual Chinese entrepreneur to now, more and more, I see that our long-term partners of Canaan and Avalon are traditional energy companies, institutional investors, financial-institutional clients and traditional financial investors. This kind of change or evolution really changed the picture of the mining industry and the nature of the mining industry.

As you mentioned, those energy companies step in because of the ability to use wasted energy and surplus daytime and nighttime energy. And this helps them to use these wasted energies and convert them into a storable value. For me, Bitcoin is a value that you can store. When you are wasting those energies, they cannot be stored in a storable way.

So, this is the perspective of the energy company. And of course, this kind of evolution and increased involvement — plus the change of the players in the mining industries — I think evolved the whole industry.

It becomes industrially scaled, and it becomes more professional throughout the mining business. It also will help with the long-term outlook of this business. People are more and more from institutional, traditional and energy companies — they work for the long term. So for me, this changes the picture. This gives us more professionalism, transparency and long-term goals in the mining industry.

Related: Will the Bitcoin mining industry collapse? Analysts explain why crisis is really opportunity

RS: I personally think that Bitcoin is a legitimate asset. There are always a number of investment theses that explain why a person should have exposure to Bitcoin. You’ve said Bitcoin has gone from a grassroots or a community-led entrepreneurial hobby for making short-term gains to an industrialized arm of the energy sector. Do you think that this legitimization by the energy sector will lead to the mass adoption of Bitcoin as an asset from an investment point of view?

EL: We are strong believers in Bitcoin, of course. We’ve been in this industry for a long time, and Canaan is one of the earliest companies. In fact, our CEO is the inventor of the ASIC miner machines. Of course we are strong believers. Like you said, you believe that it is an asset. It is, for me, an asset. Again, if you’re looking at what I say, the profile of the mining industry and its entrepreneurs is changing. But if you’re looking at Bitcoin itself — when we started this industry, it was more or less that the Bitcoin was in the hands of those individual entrepreneurs. And since the past three years, as I mentioned, the traditional financial institutions and companies have been in this industry. So, that really changes Bitcoin, the ownership and the profile of the ownership.

That’s why in recent years, Bitcoin is more and more correlated with traditional financial market fluctuations. The volatility of Bitcoin is more or less coherent with the current traditional market versus the previous one. So, this is really a change for me for the positive, that Bitcoin is one of the traditional financial assets. It is an asset and is becoming more and more traditional now — that’s what I mean.

RS: Many long-term investors, retail investors and small miners who used to mine at home as a hobby or for profit fear that the industrialization of mining and Wall Street’s move into cryptocurrencies is going to damage what Bitcoin stands for and dilute the movement. Do you believe the Bitcoin revolution is being co-opted?

EL: Yes, well, you’re right. I mean, first of all, we believe in Bitcoin. We believe in decentralization as well. Since we haven’t discussed in detail the technologies, when I mentioned our Canaan Avalon, when we produce our machines, the normal air cooling system consumes power less than 3,500 watts.

We are not like the other companies that develop containers for order. The big companies produce machines that consume over 6,500 watts. These companies are developing machines that are not for retail miners. We are sticking to the start of the culture, and decentralization is at its core. If you’re looking at our machines, we are focusing on individual machines. Each machine must consume less than 3,500 watts, which means that every individual at home can mine in their house, garage or in their kitchen. You buy one or 10. That depends on your cost of electricity and such, but the machine is decentralized. You don’t necessarily have to be mining with big companies assembling in a huge mining site or under a huge infrastructure of containers.

RS: Is there anything that you want to say to the world? Do you have any personal thoughts you'd like to share?

EL: I think anybody in this industry knows that Bitcoin has a cycle, right? Sometimes the cycle lasts two to three years, sometimes three to six months, or sometimes longer. This time, I believe it will be shorter. Of course, nobody can predict it, but I have more confidence that by the end of the year, the price will be going up slowly. And in the long term, I strongly believe that Bitcoin will have much better growth in terms of price.

This is one thing that I want to tell the industry: Let’s be confident in this industry because this industry has really evolved in terms of mining machine technologies, in terms of infrastructure build-ups, by using green energies, and in terms of a good ratio mix of individual and institutional players. And again, in terms of Bitcoin being ownership, as I mentioned, even you believe it’s a sort of financial asset now.

So, everything for me is growing or evolving toward positive long-term things. I do have strong confidence, and I do want to convey this kind of confidence to people and to the readers of Cointelegraph.

I’m Chinese, and in my language, the Chinese character for crisis is two characters composed in one word, “crisis.” But in fact, you can separate the two characters. One is crisis, and the other is opportunity. In Chinese, we say 危机 (pronounced wei ji). This moment is the moment of 危机 (wei ji). The first character (危) means danger, or crisis, and the second character (机) means opportunity. The Chinese always see crisis in two parts. One is, of course, a crisis, and you have to be alert. You have to be serious. You have to prepare yourself to anticipate this crisis. But we believe in more opportunities during the crisis. There are a lot of opportunities. So, the Chinese word “危机” is always crisis and opportunity.

I do believe this moment is more opportunity than crisis — more opportunities for miners, miner manufacturers, infrastructure builders, energy builders and even traditional financial investors. For me, I look at this time as a time for more opportunities.

This interview has been condensed and edited for greater clarity.

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

‘There’s a lot less land to go around’ — why White Rock established off-the-grid mining in Texas

“The U.S. is where the action is in terms of markets, so we plan to be in at least another couple of states as well as Texas with some diversified offering," said CEO Andy Long.

Amid many cryptocurrency mining firms in Texas scaling down operations to reduce the load on the power grid, at least one company set up miners not quite as affected by the state’s energy requirements during extreme heat.

In June, White Rock Management expanded its crypto mining operations to Texas — its first in the United States — but reported its facility in the Brazos Valley region would mine Bitcoin (BTC) using “environmentally responsible” methods. While the firm’s mining operations in Sweden used hydroelectric power, White Rock CEO Andy Long told Cointelegraph that its Texas facility was “off grid”, powered only by natural gas that would otherwise be burned.

“The U.S. is where the action is in terms of markets, so we plan to be in at least another couple of states as well as Texas with some diversified offering — it won’t all be off grid,” said Long.

The White Rock CEO said major storm systems capable of knocking out power supplies — of which Texas has had no shortage in the crypto era — played a role in the company’s decision to rely on flared gas for mining, but said it would explore “a mixture of different power sources” as it expanded to different U.S. states, including hydroelectric and nuclear. According to Long, the Texas facility would have a 10-megawatt capacity “in the next month or two” and had already passed a total hashrate of 1 exahash per second.

New York was a less appealing option for White Rock to first expand to the U.S. given the regulatory environment was “sending the wrong message," according to Long. State lawmakers have pushed for legislation that would ban proof-of-work mining.

“As soon as you start to say to energy companies ‘oh, you can do this with your power, but not this’, then they’ll start to tell you which networks you can mine, or you can mine this coin but not that coin. We would rather create a welcome environment for investment and regulatory certainty — that’s one of the things we like about Texas.”

Texas is home to many crypto mining firms including Core Scientific, Riot Blockchain, and Argo Blockchain, all of which announced in July they would voluntarily scale back operations at the request of the state’s energy grid operator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. Low winds reducing the energy production from the state’s turbines as well as the need for electricity to run air conditioners caused concerns demand could surpass the available power supply.

“I think it’s good practice for miners to provide that demand response,” said Long. “It’s not really going to hurt their earnings [...] it’s a good example of the grid and miners working together.”

Related: Crypto bear market will provide ‘excellent’ M&A opportunities: White Rock CEO

The White Rock CEO added that due in part to the energy crisis in Europe as many countries attempt to stop relying on natural gas and oil from Russia, sites suitable for crypto mining were “getting harder to find” with cheap power:

“A year ago, even two years ago, you could find pretty cheap power in a lot of places and it wasn’t that hard to find good sites and to deploy large amounts of miners. What’s changed is everybody’s doing orders of magnitude more of hardware and there’s a lot less land to go around [...] I think also the owners and the operators, the utilities companies they’re looking for larger companies that they know can rely on to pay their power bill.”

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

Core Scientific increased Bitcoin production by 10% in July amid Texas power cuts

The mining firm reported it “completely powered-down its Texas data center operations on several occasions” in July to support the state's power grid operator.

Crypto mining firm Core Scientific reported its operations produced 1,221 Bitcoin (BTC) in July even as the company powered down several times in response to demand on the Texas power grid.

In a Friday announcement, Core Scientific said its month-over-month Bitcoin production had increased from 1,106 in June to 1,221 in July — roughly 10.4%. The firm reported curtailing operations “due to extreme temperatures at multiple data centers,” but also increased the number of its self-mining servers and hashrate by 6%, to 109,000 and 10.9 exahashes per second (EH/s), respectively.

According to Core Scientific, the company “completely powered-down its Texas data center operations on several occasions” in July to support the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, which controls the state’s power grid. The firm reported curtailing its power demands by 8,157 megawatt-hours (MWh).

Residents in many parts of Texas experienced several consecutive days of temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit in July, with ERCOT having forecast demand for electricity could have surpassed the available supply. Riot Blockchain, which also hosts mining operations in Texas, reported a 24% drop in its BTC production from June to July, from 421 to 318. According to CEO Jason Les, the firm curtailed operations by 11,717 MWh.

Related: Will the Bitcoin mining industry collapse? Analysts explain why crisis is really opportunity

Core Scientific CEO Mike Levitt said in July the firm planned to expand its data center hosting capacity by 75 MW, aiming to have a hash rate of 30 EH/s by the end of 2022. As of July 31, the company reported it held 1,205 BTC worth roughly $28 million at the time of publication, having sold more than 7,000 BTC for $167 million in June and 1,975 BTC for $44 million in July.

The mining firm plans to release its earnings report from the second quarter of 2022 on Aug. 11.

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

Crypto firms failed to deliver ‘promised benefits’ from lawmaker-backed incentives, says nonprofit

“At a minimum, the public should have a say in these crypto handouts," said the Tech Transparency Project.

The Tech Transparency Project, or TTP, a research initiative of the United States-based nonprofit watchdog group Campaign for Accountability, has released a report claiming crypto firms “provided little in return” for state governments offering financial incentives. 

In a report released Thursday, the TTP said that many crypto firms based in certain U.S. states have “reaped special benefits” for setting up operations while not always delivering jobs, economic growth or tax benefits for residents. According to the group, crypto lobbyists worked on behalf of firms to gain tax breaks and discounted energy prices while state governments have “faced budget shortfalls, surging energy consumption and serious environmental damage.”

The research group cited policies going back to 2017 in which state governments including those of Nevada, Wyoming, Montana and Kentucky passed pro-crypto legislation to incentivize firms to set up shop. In Montana, for example, the TTP reported policymakers passed a law in 2017 that cut property taxes on the data centers used to mine cryptocurrency. Mining firms moved in, only to later see residents complain “about excessive noise, waste and power use” and call for a moratorium.

In Wyoming, where lawmakers passed bills exempting crypto firms from property taxes and there is no state income tax for residents, the TTP reported that blockchain-based payments firm Ripple offered no jobs in the state while crypto exchange Kraken listed only one. In 2020, Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon reported having to consider “devastating but necessary” budget cuts for government departments, with legislators reportedly considering similar action on K-12 education in 2021 — though the economic impact of the pandemic may have also played a role.

The group added:

“At a minimum, the public should have a say in these crypto handouts. Especially in states suffering economic woes, the perception of innovation shouldn’t come before material taxpayer benefit.”

Related: Georgia lawmakers consider giving crypto miners tax exemptions in new bill

Kentucky lawmakers voted to remove sales tax from electricity purchased by local crypto mining operators in 2021 and made mining firms eligible for state tax incentives aimed at clean energy businesses. A report released by the Office of the State Budget Director in November 2021 estimated these incentives cost the state roughly $11.6 million each year.

“It’s too soon to tell how much these measures, which went into effect on July 1, will actually cost Kentuckians,” said the TTP. “But several state programs are already facing significant budget pressure, which could be exacerbated by the cryptocurrency incentives [...] The tax incentives are also unlikely to create new jobs in Kentucky.”

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

Will the Bitcoin mining industry collapse? Analysts explain why crisis is really opportunity

Many BTC miners are in a tough spot and a few could collapse, but experts say the industry is here to stay.

Bitcoin mining involves a delicate balance between multiple moving parts. Miners already have to face capital and operational costs, unexpected repairs, product shipping delays and unexpected regulation that can vary from country to country — and in the case of the United States, from state to state. On top of that, they also had to contend with Bitcoin’s precipitous drop from $69,000 to $17,600. 

Despite BTC price being 65% down from its all-time high, the general consensus among miners is to keep calm and carry on by just stacking sats, but that doesn't mean the market has reached a bottom just yet.

In an exclusive Bitcoin miners panel hosted by Cointelegraph, Luxor CEO Nick Hansen said, “There’s going to definitely be a capital crunch in publicly listed companies or at least not even just publicly listed companies. There’s probably close to $4 billion worth of new ASICs that need to be paid for as they come out, and that capital is no longer available.”

Hansen elaborated with:

“Hedge funds blow up very quickly. I think miners are going to take 3 to 6 months to blow up. So we’ll see who’s got good operations and who’s able to survive this low margin environment.”

When asked about future challenges and expectations for the Bitcoin mining industry, PRTI Inc. advisor Magdalena Gronowska said, “One of the biggest challenges that we’ve had in this transition to a low-carbon economy and reducing GHG emissions has been an underinvestment in technology and infrastructure by the public and private sectors. What I think is really amazing about Bitcoin mining is that it’s really presenting a completely novel way to fund or subsidize that development of energy or waste management infrastructure. And that's a way that’s beyond those traditional taxpayer or electricity ratepayer pathways because this way is based on a purely elegant system of economic incentives.”

Will Bitcoin destroy the environment?

As the panel discussion shifted to the environmental impact of BTC mining and the widely held assumption that Bitcoin’s energy consumption is a threat to the planet, Blockware Solutions analyst Joe Burnett said:

“I think Bitcoin mining is just not bad for the environment, period, I think if anything, it incentivizes more energy production, it improves grid reliability, and resilience and I think it will likely lower retail electricity rates in the long term.”

According to Burnett, “Bitcoin mining is a bounty to produce cheap energy, and this is good for all of humanity.”

Related: Texas a Bitcoin ‘hot spot’ even as heat waves affect crypto miners

Will industrial Bitcoin mining catalyze the long-awaited “mass adoption” of crypto?

Regarding Bitcoin mining dominance, the future of the industry and whether or not the growth of industrial mining could eventually lead to crypto mass adoption, Hashworks CEO Todd Esse said, “I believe that most of the mining down the road will be held in the Middle East and North America, and to some extent Asia. Depending upon how much they are eventually able to cut off. And that really speaks to the availability of natural resources and the cost of power.”

While it is easy to assume that growing synergy between big energy companies and Bitcoin mining would add validity to BTC as an investment asset and possibly facilitate its mass adoption, Hansen disagreed.

Hansen said:

“No, certainly not, but it is going to be the thing that transforms everyone's life whether they know it or not. By being that buyer of last resort and buyer of first resort for energy. It's going to transform energy, energy markets and the way it is produced and consumed here in the US. And overall, it should significantly improve the human condition over time.

Don’t miss the full interview on our YouTube channel and don’t forget to subscribe!

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content of product on this page. While we aim at providing you all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor this article can be considered as an investment advice.

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

How blockchain can address Austria’s energy crisis

In the future, energy communities should make a greater contribution to the energy transition.

Climate change has become one of the biggest global challenges for humanity. At the same time, the dependence on hydrocarbon energy sources such as coal, oil and natural gas is still strong.

Supply lines around these energy sources are further vulnerable to geopolitical tensions. Due to the current sanctions against Russia, experts now expect rising electricity prices and negative effects on the energy market in Europe.

The Austrian government understands the urgent need for the energy transition and has set the ambitious goal of being climate neutral by 2040. Alternative solutions to fossil energy have been slow to emerge and, for the most part, are not yet efficient enough on a large scale. But there are promising approaches — especially in the form of decentralized renewable energies or blockchain technology in peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading.

There are already pilot projects in Austria dealing with P2P trading on the energy market. At the forefront are blockchain scale-up Riddle&Code and Austria’s largest energy provider Wien Energie, which founded a joint venture in 2020 called Riddle&Code Energy Solutions.

As of April 1 of this year, Kai Siefert is the new head of the joint venture. He was formerly an IT strategist at Wien Energie and worked on the energy tokenization platform MyPower in Vienna. Cointelegraph auf Deutsch caught up with Siefert to ask how we can combat the energy crisis with the help of blockchain.

From pilot project to solar tokenization 

Wien Energie and Riddle&Code have been working together for a long time. Back in 2017, the companies launched the first project called Peer2Peer in Quartier where they tokenized photovoltaic solar systems so that consumers can participate in energy production. 

Later, at the end of 2018, when Siefert was still Wien Energie’s IT strategist, his team developed a blockchain strategy together with Astrid Schober, head of IT at Wien Energie, and focused on the topic of energy tokenization with security tokens and utility tokens.

This resulted in the MyPower platform. First, Wien Energy and Riddle&Code tested the decentralized trading of self-generated solar power via blockchain in a smart city project with 100 participants. Everything went smoothly, and in 2021, a tokenization platform for photovoltaic plants was launched. Riddle&Code tokenized the largest solar plant in Austria and gained 1,000 customers who, as part of its advertising campaign, bought energy vouchers issued by Wien Energie in the form of tokens, which could be used to pay electricity bills.

Now MyPower tokenizes solar photovoltaic assets across the whole of Austria, allowing consumers to benefit from partial ownership and invest in renewable energy sources.

Demand for renewable energy is huge

According to Siefert, the concept of energy sharing is very much in demand at the moment. Due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the coronavirus crisis, electricity prices are skyrocketing. Rising energy prices can be mitigated with cheaper renewable energies, smart information technology and energy sharing. 

Recent: Not just Bitcoin price: Factors affecting BTC miner profitability

With blockchain-based energy sharing, jointly generated electricity is fed into the grid, distributed and sold directly to flats — all without an intermediary. Kilowatt-hours not consumed can also be sold to other energy communities, and thus, consumers earn or save money.

Energy sharing can enable direct energy trading between energy consumers (energy producers and end-consumers), who can use this approach to take control of their generation and demand. People who rent instead of owning their homes can actively participate in the energy transition and benefit from the proceeds. This gets consumers more involved in their own generation and puts local value creation at the center.

“You don’t need to buy natural gas from Russia or oil from Saudi Arabia to create energy here in Europe,” Siefert said. “The sun comes virtually for free and reliably produces electricity. But many people can’t participate because they don’t have their own house, but live in a rented flat or simply don’t have the means to buy a large solar system. However, we can divide these plants into small digital asset tokens so that private investors with little capital can also participate.”

Renewable energies “are coming into focus”

In Austria, there are already small renewable energy communities such as Erneuerbare-Energie-Gemeinschaften (EEG). Such energy communities (in Austria and according to the Renewable Energy Expansion Act) are nonprofit-orientated legal entities intended to decentralize the generation, distribution and consumption of renewable energy mainly for the public benefit. Such EEGs still play a small role in production, local and regional distribution, and consumption of renewable energy and are often not very profitable.

However, things are starting to develop. According to Siefert, the demand for EEGs has already increased enormously due to rising energy prices, and Riddle&Code Energy Solutions offers technical solutions for setting up and onboarding such EEGs. “We can also connect them to decentralized marketplaces with our system,” Siefert said. This is already possible with the Renewable Energy Expansion Act, which has been in force since 2021 and is a European Union directive that has been transposed into national law.

Siefert noted an “increasing interest in interesting in renewable energies” — in Austria, Europe and worldwide. Companies working in the field of renewable energies “are now coming into focus,” as they are benefiting “from the large investments favored by climate policy worldwide,” Siefert said.

Real-time data signed and encrypted on the blockchain

At the moment, P2P energy trading is not yet allowed in Austria. Everything works on the basis of the current electricity market infrastructure, and billing data is made available by the grids 24 hours after it has been measured. 

But Riddle&Code Energy Solutions can already take this data in real-time. A dongle that can be connected directly to the smart meter reads data live from the customer interface and sends it via a trusted gateway — signed and fully encrypted on the blockchain. From there, this data can be read out immediately. Customers can see every quarter of an hour how their credit grows in kilowatt-hour tokens.

Recent: Proof-of-time vs proof-of-stake: How the two algorithms compare

This data cannot be used for billing yet, but it helps to incentivize the right consumption behavior. Thanks to such data, the customer can see how much green energy they have on the grid from the community installation and, for example, use this time to turn on the washing machine or charge an electric car. This, in turn, has an indirect effect on the bill because customers then pay less if they use more electricity from their own shared forms.

“Our goal is that everyone can participate in energy sharing,” Siefert said. “But private P2P trading is currently not possible in Austria until legal regulation is created. That is why I would like to see more freedom here from the government side and more speed in the expansion of renewables. Austria can become one of the leading nations in the EU and worldwide in terms of P2P energy trading and the development of energy communities.”

This is a short version of the interview with Kai Siefert. You can find the full version here (in German).

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

The Merge is Ethereum’s chance to take over Bitcoin, researcher says

Ethereum's imminent transition to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism will transform its monetary policy, potentially making ETH more scarce than Bitcoin.

Ethereum researcher, Vivek Raman, is convinced that Ethereum’s (ETH) upcoming transition to a proof-of-stake system will enable it to take over Bitcoin’s (BTC) position as the most prominent cryptocurrency.

"Ethereum does have, just from an economic perspective and because of the effect of the supply shock, a chance to flip Bitcoin," said Raman in an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph. 

The Merge, a long-awaited upgrade that will complete Ethereum's transition from a proof-of-work to a proof-of-stake system, is set to take place in September. In addition, The Merge will transform Ethereum's monetary policy, making the network more environmentally sustainable and reducing ETH's total supply by 90%. 

"After The Merge, Ethereum will have lower inflation than Bitcoin. Especially with fee burns, Ethereum will be deflationary while Bitcoin will always be inflationary. Although, with every halving, the inflation rate goes down," pointed out Raman. 

While Bitcoin will retain its function as digital gold, according to Raman, Ethereum will still have “a larger adoption space” as the base layer of the decentralized finance (DeFi) economy. 

The Merge won’t reduce Ethereum’s high transaction fees, which is still the main issue preventing Ethereum from scaling. That is not an issue, according to Raman, as Ethereum will rely on layer2 scaling solutions to support most users' activity. 

“Users need to learn that all of their activities should be on layer 2 and then layer 2s ultimately will use Ethereum as a base layer 1 for settlement and security and decentralization.”

Check out the full interview on our YouTube channel and don’t forget to subscribe!

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry

ECB Calls for Urgent Regulation of Stablecoins and Defi, Won’t Rule Out Bitcoin Mining Ban

ECB Calls for Urgent Regulation of Stablecoins and Defi, Won’t Rule Out Bitcoin Mining BanA new report by the European Central Bank (ECB), presented as a “deep dive into crypto financial risks,” calls for “appropriate” regulation and oversight of stablecoins and decentralized finance (defi). It also addresses the hot topic of Bitcoin’s carbon footprint in Europe, suggesting a ban on proof-of-work mining is probable. Growth of Stablecoins, Defi Warrants […]

Crypto Advocacy Group Coin Center Names Top Three Threats Against Digital Asset Industry