1. Home
  2. esg

esg

Banking Giant Societe Generale Says It Has Issued First ‘Digital Green Bond’ on Ethereum (ETH) Network

Banking Giant Societe Generale Says It Has Issued First ‘Digital Green Bond’ on Ethereum (ETH) Network

One of the largest banks in France says it has issued the first-ever digital green bond as a security token on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain. In a new press release, banking giant Societe Generale says it has issued the eco-friendly bond to increase transparency and traceability surrounding ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data. “This transaction […]

The post Banking Giant Societe Generale Says It Has Issued First ‘Digital Green Bond’ on Ethereum (ETH) Network appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

Societe Generale issues its first green bond on Ethereum

The unsecured bond has a value of 10 million euros and a maturity of three years, with all the proceeds going for eligible green activities investments.

The third-largest bank in France, Societe Generale, reported issuing its first digital green bond as a security token on the Ethereum public blockchain. The bond, registered by Forge, a subsidiary of Societe Generale, went public on Nov.

The bond has a value of 10 million euros (around $11 million) and a maturity of three years.

Related: Tether’s ‘new era for capital raises’ Bitfinex bond stutters

The digital infrastructure of the bond grants 24/7 open access to the data on its carbon footprint through the bond’s smart contract.

“This enables issuers and investors to measure the carbon emissions of their securities on the financial infrastructure.” 

Another innovation of the bond is a technical option for investors to settle securities on-chain through the EUR CoinVertible, a euro-pegged stablecoin issued by Forge in April 2023.

“While Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) solutions are being experimented, this panel of settlement methods demonstrates the large capabilities of SG-FORGE in providing full spectrum of on-chain services.”

Societe Generale has been active in the crypto sector, issuing euro bonds on the Ethereum blockchain and security tokens on the Tezos blockchain, as well as proposing Dai (DAI) stablecoin loans in exchange for bond tokens. In July 2023, Forge became the first company to obtain the highest access license for crypto services in France. 

Read more

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

Jacobi spot Bitcoin ETF classed as ‘environmental investing’ by issuer

Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF has been defined as an Article 8 fund by its issuer firm.

The first-ever spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) launched on the European market has been classed as an Article 8 fund by its issuer firm, London-based Jacobi Asset Management. Funds included under Article 8 of the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SDFR) are those that “promote environmental and/or social characteristics.” 

On Aug. 29, Bloomberg reported that Jacobi Asset Management had classified its Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF as an Article 8 fund. The fund, launched on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange on Aug. 15, becomes the first Bitcoin ETF traded in Europe, and the first to have the European Union’s environmental, social and governance investing rules applied.

Related: Hashdex joins race for spot Bitcoin ETF with unique strategy

The report cites Martin Bednall, Jacobi’s CEO, who calls the ETF “fully decarbonized” for its partial investments in renewable energy certificates (RECs). However, academic experts questioned by journalists posed a contradiction: With Bitcoin’s mining energy intensity, the ETF should purchase such a high amount of RECs that it would not only match but exceed the volume of energy consumed by its Bitcoin assets.

Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF went live more than a year later than its planned launch in 2022. The introduction was promoted as the primary spot, or physically-backed, Bitcoin (BTC) fund, providing investors with an opportunity to access a financial product supported by actual BTC.

From the outset, Jacobi Asset Management emphasized the eco-friendly nature of the ETF. The fund uses outside information to calculate how much energy the Bitcoin network uses. It then purchases and “retires” RECs. These certificates are tracked on a blockchain service, which is designed to let investors confirm the fund’s environmentally friendly statements.

Magazine: Bitcoin ‘supercomputer’ and BTC DeFi coming soon

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

KPMG touts ESG benefits from Bitcoin, counters misperceptions in new report

The report compares Bitcoin energy usage to that of clothes dryers (equal) and its emissions to those of manure (much less) in a slight but readable document.

KPMG has released a report on Bitcoin and ESG (environment, social and governance) issues. The professional services firm, one of the world’s Big Four, found that Bitcoin “appears to provide a number of benefits across an ESG framework.”

Looking at each component of ESG separately, the report noted that emissions is a more significant indicator of environmental damage than energy usage. It contextualized Bitcoin (BTC) emissions in relation to those of other sources that ranged from tobacco to tourism and found it was the second smallest contributor behind “Video (US).” It concluded:

“Bitcoin’s emissions may be lower than often discussed.”

The report repeated common strategies for improving Bitcoin’s carbon footprint, such as using more renewable energy and energy produced from methane for mining.

Bitcoin’s contribution to money laundering is tiny compared to the total; money laundering accounts for 2-5% of world GDP, the report said, citing United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime statistics, while it accounts for just 0.24% of Bitcoin transactions, per Elliptic. It also noted that laundered money was received in Bitcoin far less than in Ether (ETH), stablecoins or alt coins, and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) measures could be applied at the point of off-ramping the coin, even though there are no AML/KYC requirements for transacting with it.

Related: Metaverse ‘explosion’ will be driven by B2B, not retail consumers: KPMG partner

Positive use cases were provided again, such as fundraising for Ukraine and electrification in rural Africa.

Bitcoin’s governance is “robust” as its rules cannot be changed without forking:

“This results in a system that cannot be abused or misused by those in power or even individuals with ulterior motives due to its decentralization.”

The 12-page report uses all secondary sources and familiar use cases. It points out, however, that Bitcoin remains misunderstood. The firm offers a number of crypto-related advisory services.

Magazine: Bitcoin in Senegal: Why is this African country using BTC?

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

C6 Bank’s Climate Tool to Track CO2 Emissions From Customer Transactions Prompts Debate on Future of Banking

C6 Bank’s Climate Tool to Track CO2 Emissions From Customer Transactions Prompts Debate on Future of BankingOn April 13, a C6 Bank customer in Brazil shared screenshots of his online bank account, revealing that the financial institution was tracking CO2 emissions from his purchases and urging him to compensate monetarily. C6 Bank states that the new tool aims to inspire Brazilians to adopt more sustainable behaviors. ‘CBDC Preview’ — Bank Customer […]

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

ESG Analyst Daniel Batten Reveals Dynamic Charts Showing Bitcoin’s 52.6% Sustainable Energy Use

ESG Analyst Daniel Batten Reveals Dynamic Charts Showing Bitcoin’s 52.6% Sustainable Energy UseEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) analyst Daniel Batten said Tuesday that the computational backbone of the Bitcoin network now uses 52.6% sustainable energy. Batten and onchain analyst Willy Woo created Dynamic Bitcoin ESG Charts to showcase the protocol’s progress. Contrary to Cambridge University Data, Analyst Says Bitcoin Mining Uses 52.6% Sustainable Energy These days, there […]

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

Rumor has it that Dogecoin could shift to proof-of-stake — What does that mean for miners?

Dogecoin shifting to proof-of-stake would be good for the environment, but what impact would it have on miners and ASIC manufacturers?

There are rumors that Dogecoin could switch from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake (PoS). 

Do I know if Dogecoin is switching to PoS?

No.

Do I think it’s going to PoS? Probably not.

But I love the “what if” game.

As a person who works in the crypto mining industry, I do my best to gauge where the market and mining industry are going, along with how that could play out. If Dogecoin makes a change to PoS or some other change to how new blocks are created, it would have massive ramifications for the mining industry.

Here’s a look at a few options and their effects.

Scrypt mining could be devastated

I’m not going to debate whether or not Dogecoin will or should switch to PoS. While it’s hard to determine if the recent rumors about the potential for a switch are true or not, they were enough to have Bitmain supposedly pause Litecoin (LTC) and Dogecoin (DOGE) miner manufacturing.

The larger question in my mind is, What happens to miners if Dogecoin switches to PoS?

First, Scrypt mining would be devastated. DOGE accounts for over 60% of the revenue with Scrypt mining. Take it away, and every L3+, every LT6 and every Mini Doge Pro, literally almost every non-L7 miner not connected to $0.04-per-kilowatt-hour electricity would need to be unplugged immediately.

Network difficulty would likely bounce all over the place for some time, while miners with older equipment struggle with the decision to keep their ASICSs on or turn them off. The apex Scrypt miner, Bitmain’s Antminer L7, would see its profitability reduced by nearly 75%, reducing profits to a whopping $4.83/day at $0.05/kWh.

What about the miners that don’t have an industrial electric rate? At $0.10/kWh, the L7 9050M, which sold for around $9,000 a few weeks ago, would earn you $0.72/day.

Yikes!

A drastic change like this would result in those who had recently purchased an L7 being very unlikely to ever recover their investment, let alone generate any profits.

ASIC manufacturers would be forced to drop prices, further impacting their bottom line

The vastly reduced profitability would inevitably lead to the price of the L7 dropping quicker than it did during the COVID-19-induced crypto crash. Pricing miners solely by their expected ROI time, at $5 a day profit, miners would be looking at the L7 having a price tag between $1,825 (12-month ROI) and $2,737.50 (18-month ROI). This reflects a minimum price reduction of nearly 70%.

How quickly would Bitmain react? Would they gradually reduce prices week after week similar to what Goldshell has done with many of its miners over the past few months? A strategy that repeatedly left a sour taste in the mouths of customers as they watched the price of the miner they just spent thousands of dollars on being slashed repeatedly.

Or would they come out and continue their recent trend of pricing miners fairly?

ASIC resellers would also bear the brunt of the negative consequences connected to a PoS shift by Dogecoin. Many L7 miners are suppliers, and retailers sitting on that would instantly need to be marked down by a substantial amount. However, based on their recent history of price-gouging customers, like charging $60,000 for a KD6 that is barely worth over $1,000 today, it’s doubtful many tears would be shed for them.

Many home miners would flood eBay and similar platforms with Scrypt miners. It would be a race to the bottom as desperate miners attempt to recoup whatever value is left in the hunk of metal that can now only be used as a doorstop or display piece if one is desperate.

Litecoin mining would survive. Those L7s would stay on because they’d still be somewhat profitable, and there really wouldn’t be another choice. It’s doubtful that the market would see a new Scrypt miner that could challenge the L7 to be developed anytime soon unless there already is a more efficient Scrypt miner in development. There are some rumors that Bitmain is working on a miner that would surpass the L7.

That’s a lot of disruption from the move to PoS, and we’ve only looked at one aspect of the crypto ecosystem. Numerous other questions and scenarios would need to be considered.

What would happen to network security?

Would the yield from staking cause DOGE to eventually be labeled a security?

Would Dogecoin be lauded for the change, or would the masses flee from what is now the second-largest PoW coin by market cap?

Now for my favorite what if. This option is unlikely, maybe even impossible, but there are different ways it could play out.

What if Dogecoin breaks away from merge-mining with LTC and creates its own mining algorithm?

Related: Dogecoin Foundation announces new fund for core developers

Innovation and competition are healthy for every industry

What if there’s a GPU mining renaissance? After the Ethereum Merge event, there’s a ton of really cheap GPUs available on the market. Those would get expensive really quickly. Mining purists would rejoice as they build their own mining rigs while trying to figure out how much DOGE they can stack. It really would be cool to see, but it wouldn’t last. The big three manufacturers — Bitmain, Goldshell and iBelink — would scramble to be the first to market with an ASIC miner.

Eventually, they’d each have at least one ASIC miner on the market, and naturally, they’ll get more powerful and more efficient over time. The jumps and increases in difficulty would be ridiculous, and just like with Bitcoin (BTC), it will eventually no longer be profitable to mine DOGE with GPUs. But it could also open the door to something the ASIC manufacturing market desperately needs: competition.

What if, following the short-lived GPU mining renaissance, a door opens for another manufacturer or manufacturers to enter the market? Currently, Bitmain, Goldshell and iBelink are the “big three,” and it’s really Bitmain that has a total stranglehold on the market. So, while it’s likely Bitmain would come out on top, what if there’s someone out there who can be first to market and maintain that lead and establish itself as a credible and reliable ASIC manufacturer?

What if that company decided to branch out into other miners and offer them fair prices? To be fair, we do have to commend Bitmain again for the pricing on its recent rollout of industry-altering miners. Reseller markups are still an issue, but that’s another topic. Perhaps this “new” competitor would adhere to the mantra that customer service actually matters. If customers could get over the reliability concerns and the company built a good product, that could happen. Admittedly, that’s a lot of what-ifs.

Alternatively, there’s a money-grab scenario for Dogecoin. The project could go directly to Bitmain, Goldshell and iBelink and say, “We’re creating our own mining algorithm, and we’ll give it to you and you alone. How much money will you give us?”

What would Goldshell pay to bring life back to a company that has taken a series of body blows from the recent altcoin miners released by Bitmain? Or would iBelink go all out to win the rights to make the miner? IBelink just released a new BM-K3 Kadena miner that boasts 70 terahashes — a nearly 75% increase over the next closest model — and it can’t celebrate because Bitmain is about to trump that with the new KA3 that brings 166 THs. In the case of a Dogecoin offer to ASIC manufacturers, how much would Bitmain pay to maintain its market dominance?

No change could be a good thing

What if DOGE chooses to simply continue with Scrypt mining?

The status quo is not that exciting, but it seems to be the most likely outcome. Sure, there may be some changes that will pass a vote, but Dogecoin will most likely continue to be merge-mined with LTC on the Scrypt algorithm.

Bitmain is likely to continue pushing out L7 inventory before launching a more efficient Scrypt miner later this year AND Goldshell will launch a Mini Doge Pro 2 for home miners that will essentially be two Mini Doge Pros in one box. The upcoming LTC halving, along with the more efficient miners, will probably push several older models to shut down for good.

Crypto markets will go up, and crypto markets will go down. There will likely be some other crypto scandal that no one sees coming that will look incredibly obvious in hindsight. The sun will come up, and the sun will come down. Of course, most suppliers and especially resellers will continue to markup miners and squeeze everything they can out of regular customers.

It’s impossible to know what’s going to happen with Dogecoin in the future, but crypto is one of the few industries where anything can happen on any given day.

Regardless of whether Dogecoin switches to PoS, the crypto mining landscape has always changed rapidly, and Scrypt mining is no different.

Change is coming.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

Climate tech VC argues Bitcoin’s ESG positives outweigh its negatives 31:1

The Bitcoin network has a 31:1 positive to negative ratio according to climate tech VC Daniel Batten.

A climate tech investor has painted a bright view of the Bitcoin (BTC) network, suggesting BTC’s environmental positives outweigh its negatives by a whopping 31:1 ratio.

On Jan. 12, self-proclaimed philanthropist and environmentalist Daniel Batten claimed in a Twitter thread that “Bitcoin is probably the most important ESG technology of our time.”

According to Batten, the 31:1 positive impact ratio was calculated by researching and interviewing grid engineers, climate scientists, BTC mining engineers, methane abatement experts, and solar and wind installers.

The findings discovered 21 ways Bitcoin could be an environmental positive and just five ways it could be an environmental negative.

Batten said that the findings were “uncannily similar” to those for the solar industry.

Many of the positives involved renewable energy grids and benefits from mining such as being the leading technology for responding to grid power demand from over and undersupply. Bitcoin mining farms can be switched on or off depending on power demand constraints.

Additionally, BTC mining can be a solution for geographic curtailment. Power curtailment is a deliberate reduction in the output below what could be produced to balance energy supply and demand, or due to transmission constraints.

There are also benefits in innovation and methane reduction, according to Batten’s findings.

BTC mining can be used to reduce vented landfill gas and flare gas emissions by using this otherwise wasted energy to power rigs.

Cast your vote now!

The handful of negatives included network emission levels, e-waste production, and the opening up of previous fossil fuel sites. However, the environmental positives far outweighed these negatives, according to Batten who opined:

“Bitcoin mining’s rapid renewable adoption can inspire other industry sectors to follow.”

“We see Bitcoin mining can play a real part in global methane mitigation,” he concluded.

Related: Bitcoin could become a zero-emission network: Report

On Jan. 13, the SCMP opposed the notion that Bitcoin was good for the environment by reporting that BTC accounted for 86.3 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2022.

However, it did acknowledge that Ethereum saw its CO2 emissions drop from 21.95 million tons in 2021 to 8,824 tons last year, according to the data from Forex Suggest. The Ethereum Merge and switch to proof-of-stake last year reduced network power consumption by 99.98%.

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

Applied Direct Response — ERCOT Study Shows Bitcoin Mining Is Beneficial to the Texas Grid

Applied Direct Response — ERCOT Study Shows Bitcoin Mining Is Beneficial to the Texas GridOn Nov. 29, 2022, The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) published a report on seasonal assessment and resource adequacy for the ERCOT region. ERCOT’s study indicates that bitcoin mining operations are flexible operations that can be beneficial to the Texas grid during the upcoming winter and extreme peak load times. ERCOT Report Says Texas […]

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?

CrossTower to acquire institutional prime brokerage BEQUANT

It comes after months of window shopping by CrossTower as crypto companies are still looking to expand despite the crypto market downturn.

Cryptocurrency exchange CrossTower Inc has agreed to buy digital asset trading platform BEQUANT, which comes after months of window shopping by CrossTower for crypto companies, including a recently revised offer for Voyager Digital's assets.

The Nov. 28 acquisition will provide CrossTower with over 600 new professional exchange clients in addition to its existing clientele. The incoming clients are based across the United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America and are collectively making over $400 billion annually.

The purchase comes as CrossTower CEO Kapil Rathi stated on Nov. 24 that CrossTower has long been on the lookout to buy digital asset companies with a “good set of customers” and a “good balance sheet,” which included a second look at the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency lending platform Voyager, who is back on the market after its initial agreement with FTX recently fell through.

Rathi said the access to over 600 exchange clients through the BEQUANT acquisition would also better position the firm to assist in re-establishing industry trust, which has been significantly dampened by recent events with FTX.

CrossTower’s deal was backed by London-based financial services firm Lydian Group, with CEO Gerard Lopez stating that he hoped CrossTower’s acquisition would lead the way in bringing more professionalism and transparency to the industry.

CrossTower set to introduce ‘industry-first’ ESG Crypto Fund

The trading platform also announced that they will soon offer an Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG)-focused Crypto Fund which will invest in “promising” companies that demonstrate a sufficient level of social and governance accountability in addition to efficiently managing energy costs.

While CrossTower didn’t disclose any potential companies that may become part of its new fund but the trading platform said it would look for companies that aren’t fueled by “greed” and instead prioritize “the democratization of finance.”

CrossTower added it would look for digital asset companies with a “proper board structure [...] checks and balances, and traditional business expertise” adding the crypto companies “in trouble” today are due to “human failure.”

Related: Saving the planet could be blockchain’s killer app

The announcement of CrossTower’s industry-first ESG Crypto Fund comes as a number of industry leaders told recently Cointelegraph that The Ethereum Merge, which took place on Sept. 15, would become a “big factor” behind institutional investment decision-making, particularly for firms like Fidelity Investments, BlackRock and Goldman Sachs who have ESG mandates.

Interestingly, a June study by investment management firm Morningstar found that 80% of investors who hold ESG-themed investments also own cryptocurrencies as reported by CNBC.

By contrast, the study also found that only 22% of non-ESG investors own cryptocurrencies.

Korean Hackers Lose Big Trading on Hyperliquid: Are They Poking for Holes?