1. Home
  2. ICO

ICO

Thai SEC issues license to Ethereum-based real estate project

The firm uses the Ethereum blockchain to allow traders to invest as little as $150 in expensive real estate properties.

The Securities Exchange and Commission of Thailand (SEC) has a license to an asset-backed token offering service based on the Ethereum blockchain.

Fraction, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Hong Kong-based fintech firm Fraction Group, has received a license allowing it to list and trade tokens for fractional ownership of physical or digital assets, the firm announced Sept. 16.

The license was granted through the Thai SEC’s official portal for  initial coin offering (ICO) established back in 2018. The license lays out the foundation for Fraction’s upcoming service for asset digitization and fractionalization, referred to as an initial fraction offering (ICO).

The firm expects to list the first IFOs for subscriptions in Q1 2022, focusing on tokens for properties in collaboration with local real estate firms. According to the announcement, Fraction is exploring an IFO with an aggregate value of more than $460 million.

“Now you can legally own a part of this villa — maybe 1% of it — rather than having to fork out $5 million to buy the whole thing,” Fraction co-founder and CEO Eka Nirapathpongporn said. The minimum amount to participate in an IFO would be around $150, he added.

Fraction co-founder and chief technology officer Shaun Sales said, “While many have been talking about it or trying to do it, our platform is completed, already up and running, and ready to list public assets.”

Related: Blockchain-based platform for fractional property ownership launches in India

The industry of tokenized property has remained relatively niche due to the technology’s nascent status and regulatory uncertainty about such offerings. According to estimations by British accountancy network Moore Global, the tokenized real estate market could hit $1.4 trillion in the next five years if just 0.5% of the total global property market were to be tokenized.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

SEC takes action against Chinese billionaire’s companies over $500M offerings

The SEC has taken action against three companies owned by Chinese Billionaire Guo Wengui for commingling the proceeds from two unregistered securities offerings.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged three of Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui’s companies over an initial coin offering (ICO) and initial public offering (IPO) that fetched around $487 million combined.

The infamous Wengui, also known as Miles Kwok or Miles Guo, is an exiled Chinese businessman who currently resides in New York. Wengui is known for his controversial political takes and his ties to Donald Trump confidant, Steve Bannon.

The SEC submitted a cease and desist order on Sept. 13, with the documents showing that Guo’s companies have agreed to pay a settlement with the SEC within 14 days.

The SEC outlined two unregistered securities offerings from Guo’s firms, with GTV Media Group, Saraca Media Group and Voice of Guo Media conducting an IPO between April 1 and June 2020. Saraca and Voice of Guo, dubbed the “G Entities,” also conducted an ICO over the same period.

The ICO raised $34 million from investors seeking exposure to the firms’ G-Dollars — a virtual currency the issuer claimed could be exchanged for gold or fiat currency or used to purchase goods on the G Entities’ online platform.

The SEC found that the G Entities did not provide investors with information regarding how its purported digital asset and platform would be developed, adding:

“The G Entities have yet to develop or distribute the digital assets sold in the Coin Offering or a platform that would allow users to transact with or sell digital assets.”

Related: SEC chair doubles down, tells crypto firms 'come in and talk to us'

Proceeds from the ICO were commingling with the funds raised in its $453 million stock offering that purported to distribute 10% of GTV’s common shares. The unregistered IPO attracted participation from 5,500 people.

The firms have agreed to pay $486.6 million in fines, prejudgment interest of $17.6 million and a civil penalty of $35 million combined.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

New research claims 21 accounts pumped the $4.4B EOS ICO with wash trades

New research asserts that EOS and ETH were wash-traded on exchanges to manipulate prices during EOS’s multi-billion dollar ICO.

New research has shed more light on the crypto industry’s largest-ever token sale, alleging that foul play may have been afoot during EOS’s initial coin offering (ICO) four years ago.

Researchers from the University of Texas have raised fresh concerns regarding Block.one’s record $4.362 billion ICO for the EOS blockchain in 2017 and 2018. The highly-anticipated project was backed by industry heavyweights including PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel alongside billionaire hedge fund managers Alan Howard and Louis Bacon. The research does not accuse Block.one itself of any wrongdoing and the company has cited a report stating there was no evidence it was involved.

On Aug. 31, Professor John Griffin of the Austin McCombs School of Business and financial analysis firm Integra FEC published their findings in a paper titled “Were ETH and EOS Repeatedly Recycled during the EOS Initial Coin Offering?” — alleging that wash-trading played a key role in EOS’s price discovery. Bloomerbe

According to the paper and outlined in an investigation by Bloomberg, EOS was allegedly wash-traded on the Binance and Bitfinex cryptocurrency exchanges in an effort to artificially inflate the prices. Wash-trading describes the process where an entity simultaneously acts as the buyer and seller at the same asset to artificially bolster volume or manipulate prices.

Griffin wrote that artificial demand from suspect accounts created the illusion of demand for the token and pushed prices up:

“First, it directly manipulated EOS’s offering price upward through the extra buying and inflated the market value of the token. Second, it created the false impression of value of the token which enticed others to want to purchase the ICO token.”

The research allegedly identified 21 accounts that recycled EOS tokens during the ICO. Funds identified as suspect amounted to 1.2 million ETH worth around $815 million at the time. Ether was the sole cryptocurrency used to buy EOS during the year-long ICO.

The analysis claims that Ethereum accounts were created in order to repeatedly purchase EOS over time. It claims that a "significant portion" of the Ether raised during the token sale appears to have been "recycled by transferring the ICO contributions through a series of obfuscating intermediary accounts and finally arriving at Bitfinex."

“2.895 million Ether ($1.721 billion USD), or 39% of the Ether raised in the crowdsale, are also traced from the ICO crowdsale wallet back to Bitfinex.”

Griffin did not identify the owners of the accounts or point the finger toward Block.one regarding the alleged wash-trading, but noted: “These suspicious accounts accounted for almost a quarter of EOS purchases by the end of the crowdsale.”

Professor of law at Cornell Law School, Robert C. Hockett, said that he worked for more than one month on the story alongside media outlet Bloomberg — which published its findings on Sept. 2.

According to Bloomberg, Block.one responded to the paper by referencing a July document authored by law firm Clifford Chance LLP that asserted there was “no evidence that Block.one purchased tokens on the primary market.”

Related: Startup Darling EOS Cashes In Millions Of ETH As ICO Scorn Continues

The same John Griffin published a paper in October 2019 titled “Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered?” that claimed the leading stablecoin Tether (USDT) was wash traded to influence Bitcoin prices during the 2017 bull market. Speaking to Cointelegraph in Feb. 2020, the firm behind Tether, iFinex, labeled the claims “reckless and false.”

Manipulation or otherwise, EOS has largely fallen out of favor with crypto traders and investors. Since ranking among the top five crypto assets by market cap in mid-2018, EOS has since tumbled to rank 35th by capitalization.

The token currently trades for $5, down 77% from its April 2018 all-time high of $22.70.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

Blockchain Australia says gov’t still dismissing industry as a ‘wild west’

The industry body has accused the government of leaning into narratives about malicious actors and scams, rather than engaging with the blockchain space to establish fit-for-purpose regulation.

Blockchain Australia, an association representing the local crypto industry, has warned that the country has fallen behind on the regulatory front due to the undue persistence of a dismissive “wild west” narrative.

The association has been proactive in its engagement with the state in recent months, as the government continues to review the future of blockchain and fintech and regulation in the country.

Appearing before the Senate Select Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Centre last week, Blockchain Australia CEO Steve Vallas said that the association strongly resists the notion that the crypto space remains “a bit of a wild west” and has been “very deliberately asking for the regulators to engage with us.” Tracing the narrative’s emergence to the 2017–18 ICO boom, Vallas accused the government of responding to the phenomenon with an overly passive “wait and see” approach:

“The landscape [...] today is entirely different. We don't see an appetite within Australia for ICOs, we don't see the regulators comfortable allowing that to happen again, so we have a new chapter, but the narrative has persisted. [...] when people don't understand the space, the tendency is to lean in on the wild west, to lean in on nefarious and bad actors.”

Vallas’ argument was broadly echoed by Michael Acima, a partner at the Australian law firm Piper Alderman, who specializes in digital law with a focus on fintech, regtech and the blockchain and digital assets industry. Unlike Vallas, however, Acima drew a close parallel between Australia’s regulatory lag and the situation in some other jurisdictions, particularly the United States. In the latter, he claimed, in cases such as crypto exchange-related crimes, he claimed that people are “effectively reading the tea leaves of what prosecutions have occurred to try and understand.”

Related: ASX sounds crypto exchange custody warning, calls for better regulations

Following Vallas and Acima, Chloe White — managing director at Genesis Block — told the committee that the Australian government has focused its energies on the industry only intermittently and largely at times of hype. Instead of continuing to engage with the space during quiet periods, local policymakers have failed to develop “a real understanding of the space and its trajectory” and have remained “in a very reactive position where policy advice and analysis has been concerned,” she said. 

Earlier this year, Conservative Australian senator Andrew Bragg argued that Australia must introduce better regulations for crypto assets if the country aspires to “stay ahead of the game” and foster tech and financial innovation.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

SEC Charges Token Listing Website With Unlawfully Touting Crypto Securities

SEC Charges Token Listing Website With Unlawfully Touting Crypto SecuritiesThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged a token listing website with unlawfully touting crypto securities. The site did not disclose that it was paid by the token issuers to profile their coin offerings. SEC Charges Website Touting Security Tokens Without Clarifying Which Tokens Are Securities The U.S. SEC announced Wednesday that a […]

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

ICO issuer charged with fraud by SEC for selling unregistered security

U.S. securities regulators are still going after ICO cheats from the 2017-18 bull market. Initial coin offerings raised tens of billions of dollars during the last major cryptocurrency bull market.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, has charged a cryptocurrency issuer for “making materially false and misleading statements” in connection with an unregistered security offering conducted between August 2017 and January 2018, offering further evidence that regulators were still targeting initial coin offerings from the last major market mania. 

Loci Inc., the platform behind LOCIcoin, and CEO John Wise were formally charged on Tuesday. The SEC claims that Loci and Wise misled investors about the company’s revenues, employee numbers and user base during the $7.6 million crowdsale. The regulator also alleges that Wise misused $38,163 in investor proceeds for personal expenses.

“Loci and its CEO misled investors regarding critical aspects of Loci’s business,” said Kristina Littman, the head of the SEC Enforcement Division’s cyber unit, adding:

“Investors in digital asset securities are entitled to truthful information and fulsome disclosures so they can make informed investment decisions.”

The order also requires that Loci and Wise pay a $7.6 million civil penalty for their transgressions.

Handing out penalties to cryptocurrency businesses is nothing new for U.S. authorities. Regulators from the SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network have imposed fines of more than $2.5 billion on cryptocurrency-related businesses since 2014, underscoring the murky regulatory climate surrounding digital assets.

Elliptic Enterprises, a blockchain analytics firm headquartered in the United Kingdom, reported Tuesday that the $2.5 billion in penalties covered a broad range of infractions, including fraud, the selling of unregistered securities and a failure to uphold Anti-Money Laundering regulations.

The SEC accounted for the lion’s share of the penalties at $1.69 billion. The CFTC imposed penalties of $624 million and FinCEN slapped crypto businesses with $183 million in fines. The Office of Foreign Asset Control handed out the smallest fines among the regulators at $606,000.

Cryptocurrencies have been described by many as the wild west of finance. Tens of thousands of crypto-centric projects have launched in the wake of Bitcoin’s genesis block in early 2009. Many of these companies got their start in 2017 during the height of the initial coin offering boom.

Related: With US regulators handing out $2.5B in fines since 2014, crypto is not the 'wild west' of finance

ICOs allowed crypto startups to raise millions of dollars without having to meet the stringent regulations of more traditional security offerings. ICO funding reached the tens of billions in 2017 and 2018 combined, attracting unwanted attention from securities regulators. The SEC successfully charged the founders of several crypto companies, which effectively put an end to the mania — in the United States, at least.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

Block.one free to focus on $10B crypto business after lawsuit settlements

With legal troubles seemingly behind the company, Block.one could set its sights on finally making a significant dent in the crypto and blockchain space.

EOSIO developer Block.one says it is focusing on its crypto business mandate after recently settling a class action lawsuit.

In a blog post published on Friday, the blockchain software firm announced a settlement agreement with a group of investors led by the Crypto Assets Opportunity Fund related to the 2018 EOS initial coin offering.

If approved by the court, Block.one will settle for $27.5 million, a figure similar to the fine remitted by the company to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission back in October 2019.

The EOS ICO that raked in over $4 billion has been the subject of some controversy with allegations that tokens were sold to U.S. investors. Some participants have also alleged that Block.one deceived investors with false and misleading statements.

Commenting on the settlement, Block.one stated:

“Block.one believes this lawsuit was without merit and filled with numerous inaccuracies. However, accepting this settlement allows us to focus more time and energy on running our business and delivering new products.”

Indeed, the company recently announced plans to launch Bullish Global — a tech subsidiary that aims to bridge the traditional and digital asset spaces. As previously reported by Cointelegraph, Block.one has raised $10 billion to establish the tech subsidiary with plans to launch a hybrid cryptocurrency exchange platform.

Related: Block.one secures funding for $10B EOS-based crypto exchange platform

Block.one’s latest venture has attracted support from major players like Galaxy Digital’s Mike Novogratz and serial investor Peter Thiel. Hedge fund managers like Louis Bacon and Alan Howard also participated in raising $300 million for Bullish Global.

Such is the extent of Block.one’s pivot to this new venture that the company reportedly sunk its Bitcoin (BTC) holdings — about 164,000 BTC valued at $9 billion at the time — into the new company. The EOSIO developer also coughed up another $100 million cash injection as well as 20 million EOS tokens.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

NYAG Court Order to Shut Down Coinseed Succeeds, CEO Creates Profanity Token for Attorney General

NYAG Court Order to Shut Down Coinseed Succeeds, CEO Creates Profanity Token for Attorney GeneralThe crypto trading platform Coinseed is shutting down operations according to a written statement from the company’s CEO Delgerdalai Davaasambuu. A court order secured by New York Attorney General Letitia James told Coinseed to halt all of its operations. Following the announcement of the shutdown, Coinseed’s CEO said he created an ERC20 token called “FLJ” […]

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

Crypto investment platform Coinseed shuts down amid NYAG lawsuit

Coinseed also created an ERC-20 token whose message is targeted at New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Coinseed, a crypto platform that enabled micro-investing in cryptocurrency assets for its users, has shut down its operations.

Delgerdalai Davaasambuu, founder and CEO of Coinseed, announced the decision via a statement published on the platform’s website.

Detailing his decision to shutter the business, Davaasambuu wrote:

“It is with an incredibly heavy heart, today I’m announcing that I am winding down the business due to a lawsuit from the NYAG (New York Attorney General).”

As previously reported by Cointelegraph, the Office of the New York State Attorney General brought fraud charges against Coinseed back in February. At the time, the NYAG accused Coinseed of misleading investors with the sale of unlicensed securities to the tune of over $1 million.

The NYAG’s legal assault on Coinseed was based on alleged violations of the Martin Act, a New York anti-fraud law. Under New York State Attorney General Letitia James, the office also used the Martin Act in its pursuit of crypto exchange Bitfinex and stablecoin issuer Tether.

In his message posted on the Coinseed website, Davaasambuu berated principal actors of the NYAG, including former New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. The Coinseed chief accused the NYAG of double standards in its pursuit of the company.

Back in February, the Coinseed CEO dismissed the NYAG’s case against the company, stating that United States citizens were not involved in its 2017 initial coin offering.

Davaasambuu also accused the NYAG of profiting from the lack of clear-cut regulations in the state as a means of extorting settlement payments from cryptocurrency firms.

The Coinseed closure comes as the company no longer has access to payment providers following the NYAG lawsuit. Davaasambuu promised to return user funds at a later date.

As part of the closure announcement, the Coinseed boss also revealed an ERC-20 token seemingly created to spite James. Dubbed FuckLetitaJames (FLJ), the token will reportedly be airdropped to interested persons.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines

To IPO or Not to IPO? SPAC is the question

An initial public offering is the classic way to take a company public, but many crypto companies bypass the regulatory scrutiny with a backdoor SPAC merger.

An initial public offering is the classic way to take a company public, but many crypto companies bypass the regulatory scrutiny with a backdoor SPAC merger

By Connor Sephton

If you want to sell stock in an American company to the public, traditionally you hold an initial public offering, better known as an IPO. 

An IPO starts with the long, arduous, and expensive process of filing an S-1 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

Of course, the purpose of an S-1 is to make sure companies are disclosing everything the public needs to know to make an informed decision about buying shares in your company, otherwise known as securities.

Which is something cryptocurrency companies tried to avoid by holding initial coin offerings, and why the SEC stomped so hard on the ICOs, suing the likes of DAO, Block.one, Telegram, and currently Ripple, levying multi-million-dollar fines and even forcing some companies to return the money raised to investors. Telegram was forced to return $1.2 billion of the $1.7 billion it raised from investors — giving them a very large haircut — as well as paying an $18.5 million fine.

And while several crypto companies have recently launched successful IPOs, there are several other routes to going public. Among them are direct public offerings, the “mini-IPOs” carried out under the SEC’s Regulation A, or the “private placement” sales under Reg. D — which severely limit the amount that can be raised or the number of investors eligible to participate. 

Another more aggressive way to decrease SEC scrutiny is the increasingly popular SPAC, which is a backdoor that involves being acquired by a public company created especially for that purpose. 

The old-fashioned way

Until recently, crypto had, by and large, opted out of IPOs. Top U.S. exchange Coinbase was the largest “pure” crypto company to go public, and it took the direct listing route, avoiding underwriters.

But that changed when trading platform INX completed the first token IPO in early May, followed shortly by Swedish crypto broker Safello. And crypto-friendly Robinhood — which got into very hot water over the recent GameStop debacle, followed by a Dogecoin SNAFU — is now going the IPO route.

There’s a reason so many firms have avoided IPOs, however. Along with the time an IPO takes — generally 12 to 18 months — the listing company works closely with a major middleman, the underwriter.

Underwriters are large Wall Street financial institutions that work closely with the listing company on regulatory issues, oversee the extensive marketing roadshow, help them set the right stock price, and then buy the shares and resell them through their networks of big institutional customers — for a hefty commission. 

That means IPOs not only cost a lot, they make it very hard for the little investor to get a piece of high-profile listings. That’s an issue of fairness that Coinbase pointed to when it chose to go direct, which meant just listing and selling shares (COIN) on the Nasdaq. 

SPAC door

A SPAC is what’s called a “blank check company” — one created solely for the purpose of allowing private companies to go public without going through a full IPO.

The SPAC raises money in an SEC-registered IPO that can only be used for one purpose — to acquire a private company — and is usually only listed on a major exchange like the NYSE or Nasdaq after the acquisition.

It's an increasingly popular option, and one that the crypto — and especially fintech — industry has embraced. In January, ICE-owned cryptocurrency exchange Bakkt announced plans to merge with VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings in a SPAC that will see it listed on the NYSE.

In March, the social trading platform eToro, a Robinhood competitor which handles both crypto and stocks, announced plans to go public through a $10.4 billion SPAC merger with the creatively named FinTech Acquisition Corp. V. 

That same month Bitfury-owned bitcoin mining firm Cipher announced a SPAC merger that valued it at $2 billion and is expected leave the merged firms with nearly $600 million in cash.

Pros and cons  

SPACs have a number of advantages, starting with speed. An IPO can take 12 to 18 months, versus a SPAC’s three to six.

Then there’s money. How much an IPO raises depends on market conditions when it happens whereas a SPAC’s price is negotiated ahead of time. 

The cost of marketing is much lower than with an IPO’s extended road show, and as SPACs are generally sponsored by people with experience in finance and industry, companies can get expert advice.

On the other hand, SPAC sponsors usually keep a 20% share in the SPAC after the merger, diluting existing shareholders’ holdings. And, SPAC investors can redeem their shares immediately, which comes off the top of the funds raised.

Beyond that, there is still plenty of SEC paperwork to file and less time to do it, as well as less of the due diligence that comes with an IPOs rigors. And, an IPO’s underwriter checks that all the regulatory requirements are met, a review SPACs don’t benefit from.

Then there’s credibility. Going the IPO route brings that in a way SPACs don’t.

Private placements and mini-IPOs

Regulations A and D a popular one for cryptocurrency companies that want to go public but don’t have the size and resources for a full IPO. 

The SEC’s Reg. D is fairly simple: Known as private placement, it comes under the IPO regulations, but the buyers must all be “accredited” investors — read “rich” or “expert”— and the disclosure hurdles are substantially lower. But, investors generally cannot sell their shares for one year.

Telegram tried to use a variation of this route with its TON blockchain, pre-selling tokens to a group of sophisticated investors under Reg. D, who would resell them to the public after the blockchain went live went live — a process called a simple agreement for future tokens (SAFT). The SEC, however, simply called it a somewhat delayed securities offering, sued, and got a court to delay the TON token sale during litigation. That forced Telegram to back down.

Reg. A, also known as a mini-IPO, is substantially more egalitarian. One company that just made it work very well is Exodus, a cryptocurrency wallet maker that recently raised $75 million — the maximum allowed under Reg. A+, which is open to any buyer. And the shares may be sold the next day.

And while the mini-IPO may be considered less onerous, it isn’t easy Exodus CEO JP Richardson said in a recent CoinTelegraph YouTube AMA. 

“It's very similar to actually doing an IPO and going through the whole process,” Richardson said. “We found one of the greatest law firms out there to help us with this — Wilson Sonsini, the same firm that did something similar with Blockstack. We started this process in the summer of 2020. We submitted a 200-page offering document” confidentially to the SEC in September. 

Which was good timing, as it was just after MicroStrategy began pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into Bitcoin and PayPal got into cryptocurrency, sparking a long bull market, Richardson added. Rallying the whole company, Exodus began selling stock on April 8. But there were no underwriters or stock exchanges involved. 

Instead, Exodus sold its stock via its own wallet, in what was “a proof of concept to show the world that this is possible,” Richardson said, adding that Exodus planned to use its experience to create a mini-IPO package for crypto firms. 

“We build in all the components from the actual offering itself, to the issuance of the stock, to the actual secondary trading,” he said “Then we will go to other companies and say, come on in. You can do a stock public offering right inside the Exodus platform. And the cool thing is you can buy legal stock at nighttime, you can buy it on a Saturday or Sunday — just like the internet. The internet ever sleeps, our stock never sleeps. And that's how it should be.”

Learn more about Exodus

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor this article can be considered as an investment advice.

Bitcoin Hits $99,997 Low as Crypto Market Faces Sharp Declines